For journalists, the Joel Tenenbaum P2P case has been the gift that keeps on giving. Case in point: the team’s court filing asking for either a new trial or a vastly reduced damage award. It turns out that the labels were at least partially responsible for Tenenbaum’s years of P2P sharing.
“Plaintiffs, in August 2004, could reasonably be considered to have been at least partially responsible for the widespread dispersion of their recordings over peer-to-peer networks like Napster and Kazaa,” writes Harvard Law professor Charles Nesson, Tenenbaum’s lawyer.
Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]