By Phil Mattera, Dirt Diggers Digest
After the New Orleans region was struck by Hurricane Katrina in 2005, Wal-Mart scored a public relations coup
by delivering emergency supplies quickly while government agencies
stumbled. Ignoring the fact that the company’s vast distribution
network made the feat relatively easy, awestruck journalists hailed the giant retailer as a “savior” for many of the storm’s victims.
The Behemoth of Bentonville has apparently not been performing any
major logistics miracles for the people of Haiti in the wake of the
recent devastating earthquake. The company is working mainly through
the Red Cross, initially providing $500,000 in cash and food kits worth $100,000.
Although the company’s outlays have apparently increased a bit since its January 13 press release,
the amount is still in the neighborhood of $1 million. To put that
number in perspective, in 2008 Wal-Mart had profits of $22 billion,
which works out to some $2.5 million an hour — every day of the year.
It is hard to be impressed at a commitment of 30 minutes worth of
profits to help deal with a disaster of the magnitude facing Haiti. But
this is not just an abstract issue of generosity.
Over the years, Wal-Mart has earned huge sums from the impoverished nation. Haiti is one of the low-wage countries where garment contractors have
produced the goods that, despite Wal-Mart’s vaunted low prices, can be
profitability sold in its network of Supercenters. It’s been going on
for many years. A 1996 report
on Haiti by the National Labor Committee noted that Wal-Mart was a
major customer of sweatshops paying garment workers as little as 12
cents an hour.
In this time of dire need, Wal-Mart should feel pressure to make a
commitment to the Haitian people of a magnitude comparable to the
wealth it has extracted from the country over the years.
The question of the obligation of a company such as Wal-Mart to a
situation such as Haiti is particularly relevant in light of the
outrageous ruling by the Supreme Court in the Citizens United case.
Thanks to the High Court’s corporate shills, Wal-Mart executives are
probably already fantasizing about the unlimited slush funds they will
have to sway elections and pressure incumbents to do their bidding.
Now is a good time to launch a movement to push corporations to do
something with their money other than buying the political system. The
outpouring of support for Haiti could be the springboard for a campaign
that demands that Wal-Mart — and other major corporations that have
benefited from the country’s cheap labor — provide not a bit of charity
but rather a substantial amount in the form of reparations.
Perhaps the way to start is to call for disclosure of an estimate of
how much value Wal-Mart has extracted from the Haitian people. Rather
than letting the company brag about its pittance of a voluntary
contribution, it would be much more satisfying to see it have to
negotiate an amount that would make a real difference for the country.