[JURIST] The US Supreme Court on Monday declined to hear an appeal brought by former Panamanian military leader Manuel Noriega challenging a lower court ruling denying his habeas corpus petition and authorizing his extradition to France on money laundering charges. Noriega, who has been declared a prisoner of war, sought to enforce a provision of the Geneva Convention that requires repatriation at the end of confinement. In an April decision, the US Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit found that his claim was precluded by § 5 of the Military Commission Act of 2006, which the Government argued “codifie the principle that the Geneva Conventionsre not judicially enforceable by private parties.” Justices Clarence Thomas and Antonin Scalia dissented from the denial of certiorari, arguing that the Court should use the opportunity to resolve confusion over its decision in Boumediene v. Bush granting federal courts the power to review habeas petitions brought by “enemy combatants.”
It is incumbent upon us to provide what guidance we can on these issues now. Whatever conclusion we reach, our opinion will help the political branches and the courts discharge their responsibilities over detainee cases, and will spare detainees and the Government years of unnecessary litigation.They said that Noriega’s case presented a unique opportunity to address the constitutional question regarding the Suspension Clause without the complications of dealing with classified evidence or “issues relating to extraterritorial detention.”The Court also granted certiorari in the consolidated cases of Abbott v. United States and Gould v. United States to consider whether the minimum sentencing guidelines for armed offenses in 18 USC § 924(c) includes the drug offense giving rise to the sentence, or another weapons offense for the same transaction.