Article Tags: ClimateGate
Malcolm Shykles posted the following comment on our “Submit your tips” page, and thought it was worthy of sharing on the front page.
The Independent Climate Change Email Inquiry gives links to:
The Royal Society
The Met Office
Directgov
BBC Weather
Wikipedia
All of the above sites strongly endorse Anthropogenic Global Warming
The BBC gives out a totally misleading explanation of the greenhouse effect by failing to explain that water vapour also needs to be present. The other sites are also strongly biased in favour and hardly point out that it is an unproven theory.
Also in “Classic Chemistry Demonstrations” published by the Royal Society in 1995, an experiment which is supposed to demonstrate the Greenhouse Effect only appears to work, but is reliant on CO2 being 1½ times heavier than air. Carbon dioxide heated in a beaker via an infra red lamp will get hot because its density is too high to get convection going in an atmosphere of air. The equivalent beaker of air stays cool.
The only reliable data can come from space and the only non NASA paper utilising data from space is from the Russian segment of the International Space Station. And here it says: “The increase in greenhouse gases concentration is not the reason of global warming, but on the contrary, the result of the rise of temperature caused by prolonged increase in the TSI.” (total solar irradiance)
Therefore the Independent Climate Change Email Inquiry is certainly not independent. It is a total waste of effort.
Source: climategate.com