Investors need to understand what they’re reading on IP rates
By Keith Schaefer
Should there be a legal or industry accepted standard for reporting IP (Initial Production) rates on oil & gas wells?
For both the industry and investors, it creates a quandary – do you want quick reporting of oil well flow rates, or do you want accurate and fair reporting?
Energy producers are often quick to produce press releases with eye-popping Initial Production rates – but with little or no context. Was it a 12 hour test, 3 day test or 30 day test? Was it the average flow rate during that time or the ending flow rate?
Horizontal wells – which now account for almost 50% of all new wells drilled – have IP rates 3x-7x what vertical wells have – but decline rates are higher, which means there is potentially a much larger gap between the initially reported rate in the press release and what production level the well stabilizes at.
Sometimes companies report IP details, and sometimes they don’t. It can be confusing for investors trying to determine what a company’s stock is worth.
And with decline rates (the drop in oil or gas production over one year) now often 60-85% in Year One, are investors really getting a fair idea of a well’s production in a press release announcing the first month’s production of a successful new well?
“It’s hard to set standards on IP rates as situations can vary, says Rock Energy CEO Allan Bey. “Obviously the longer the test the better with full disclosure of pressures etc., but sometimes you can’t do a long test because of other circumstances.”
One CFO who asked not be named says “You can have quick or you can have fair – you choose. We choose 'fair' which means the info is not quick. Others choose differently.”
His comment brings up the flip side of this issue – there are companies who don’t report any production rates until several wells have been drilled in a new play, and flowing for a month or two – which can often take six months – before they report flow rate data to the market.
This can be an issue because timeliness and transparency are important to all investors. There are pro and con arguments on all sides of this issue.
So what should retail investors do?
Companies usually give production guidance for the year – both an average and year end rate – which will have factored in the declines and sustainable production rates from wells. That’s usually found in both quarterly releases and in a presentation on the website.
And more and more management teams are including well production profiles on their different plays in their investor presentation, that show what the average IP rates are, and how production declines month by month going out two years. But as a general rule, investors should understand that a well will produce at an average stabilized production rate of only 25%-50% of the reported IP rate in a press release, even if it’s a 30 day test.
Caveat emptor.
Keith Schaefer is the
Editor/Publisher of the Oil and Gas Investments Bulletin. He writes on
the issues, trends and companies in the North American energy sector.
He also has a paid subscription service where he covers junior and
intermediate stocks. His website is www.oilandgas-investments.com
Previous posts:
Will the U.S. need Canadian natural gas
Determining oil and gas valuations