Dear Leader Reid, a Bipartisan Jobs Bill Needs More than Words

02.22.10 08:06 AM

Since Senator Scott Brown (R-Mass.) rocked the political landscape, President Obama, Leader Reid and the media elite have sounded a trumpet for bipartisanship. It’s funny how losing a filibuster-proof majority can reorient your perspective.

At the same time, the clarion call from the American people was that jobs—not health care takeovers, cap-and-trade energy taxes or financial regulations—should be Washington’s main focus. Leader Reid had a chance to embrace the bipartisanship he claimed to desire and advance his “jobs bill.” However, he realized that bipartisanship means compromise. It means accepting things you may not want. And he decided he’d rather advance a stripped down, ineffective bill than swallow a bipartisan proposal.

Senators Baucus (D-Mont.) and Grassley (R-Iowa) thought they had Reid’s blessing as they put forth a bipartisan effort to stimulate employment and cut taxes. But Reid killed the bill in less than a day. Reports of objections from Reid’s left flank were too much for the Leader.

Today, Reid will get a cloture vote on his own stripped down “jobs bill.” It’s still unclear if the measure will pass. But if the weak and ineffective measures in Reid’s bill die on a party-line vote, he will have no one to blame but himself.

So much for the majority’s commitment to bipartisanship.

http://www.americansforprosperity.or…eds-more-words