by Debra Eschmeyer
Of
the 50 or so food and farm conferences I’ve attended in the last several years,
the Drake Forum for America’s New Farmers: Policy
Innovations & Opportunities held March 4-5 in Washington, D.C.,
rises to the top. Actual farmers—not just commodity crop growers but
innovative “agripreneurs” like Xe Susane Moua from Minnesota and Rosanna Bauman from
Kansas—got to tell the USDA what they needed to survive.
But
were policymakers listening? Many of the invited speakers with a political row to hoe seemed to be concerned about one segment of farmers in particular.
Farm building in southwest Story County, Iowa.Photo: cwwycoff1 via FlickrSecretary
of Agriculture Tom Vilsack kicked off the conference with the message that to
preserve and grow rural America, which is the heart and soul of this country,
we need to stop thinking about big versus small and start thinking more
inclusively. He shared the usual dismal statistics—the increased
unemployment in these areas, the lower per-capita income, and how more than 57%
of rural counties have shrunk. All to say, what we’ve been doing to conserve
and grow rural America isn’t working.
Among
the alternative strategies the administration has launched recently is the Know Your Farmer, Know Your Food initiative, intended to shore up the shrinking numbers of farmers. There are
tremendous opportunities to build on local and regional supply chains through
connecting local products to local consumption, Vilsack noted, but then quickly
followed with “it’s not the only answer, though.”
Bill
Even, South Dakota’s Secretary of Agriculture, picked up that thread. He
began by asking the Republicans in the room to raise their hand: a paltry 5 out
of 200 shot up. After praising the USDA’s Know Your Farmer initiative for
helping to reconnect society to the soil, he got to the message that he
repeated throughout his 10-minute speech: “Don’t disparage one type of
agriculture”—by which he meant conventional, large-scale industrial “production”
agriculture. Quoting his mother, he said that “blowing out someone else’s
candle doesn’t make yours burn brighter,” and echoing Vilsack, he ended
with how “this is a big tent for all types of agriculture.”
I
presented at the Drake Forum on behalf of beginning farmers (along with Zoe
Bradbury, a young farmer and Grist contributor)
and to share how Farm to
School programs offer
a new, stable market for farmers and an opportunity to teach agriculture
literacy to youth. After Dan Durheim from the American Farm Bureau Federation made comments
along the same lines as Even and Vilsack, I felt it necessary to make a pointed
comment to the closing plenary:
There
seems to be a common thread throughout this panel, that started off with the
Secretary’s welcoming remarks that there’s plenty of room at the USDA and in
food and farm country for all types of agriculture, and to not be down on
certain practices. But if we had done that in the 1860s,
we never would have abolished slavery because slavery “worked” for
plantation owners. When atrazine is creating infertile rural populations, it’s
not about “blowing out a candle”—it’s about putting out a fire.
I found the chutzpah to make that comment because I had Even’s
children in mind; he had mentioned his 16-year-old son in his remarks. Being a
Midwesterner, however, I felt the need to tell him later that I wasn’t
attacking him personally, just the logic he used to come to what I thought was
a short-sighted conclusion, to which he responded, “yeah, you kind of
threw me under the bus.”
Even
had started his presentation with, “To understand where someone stands, you
need to know where they stood,” so I outlined my own
rural conservative roots and told him I come from a farming family. I wanted
him to see that I am not just some liberal academic
pointing fingers at farmers, but that we share in
many ways a common background from which I have diverged. While yes,
there “is room for” all types of agriculture, I believe we must acknowledge
that some types of agriculture are broken—making us and our land sick, and
draining our rural communities of youth.
Even
said he agreed with me. That if agriculture doesn’t make sense “economically,
scientifically, or socially, then it has to change.”
He said he was meeting Tuesday in South Dakota with a group called “Ag
Unity,” which he implied is to bring opposing groups working in their
proverbial rural silos together. But the
only description I can find of Ag Unity is for “an umbrella group of
some 20 agriculture-related groups” that sounds a lot like they’re all
hailing from the same side of the commodity-focused production fence.
Phrases like “big tent” and “ag unity” make for
good speeches but bad policy when it comes to the next generation of farmers. Real unity is about finding common
ground for “mother nature and the workers, the reapers and the threshers, the
seedlings and the raindrops, the bakers and the truckers, the ranchers and the
farmers, the butchers and inspectors, the cows and special cheffers,” as the
fifth graders from Elysian Charter School sang in “Who Put That Burger on Your Plate?” (the winning video in last year’s “Real Food Is” winning Farm to School contest). And that’s going to take leadership that’s not afraid to level the
growing field through targeted procurement and research funding.
Note: The National Sustainable Agriculture Coalition is collecting policy recommendations and ideas for a Beginning Farmer Bill for the 2012 Farm Bill via email.
Related Links:
Are you a farmer at heart? Start a ‘Crop Mob’
Policy fixes to unleash clean energy, part 7
Policy fixes to unleash clean energy, part 6
