by Jonathan Hiskes
The Fisk coal-fired power plant, ChicagoCourtesy swanksalot via FlickrChicago Alderman Joe
Moore is taking aim at urban air pollution, introducing a Clean Power Ordinance today that would
force overhauls of the city’s two
coal-fired power plants, both located in Hispanic neighborhoods.
The plan would
introduce new limits for particulates (soot) and carbon dioxide, restricting how
much pollution the plants can release per unit of energy produced. The limits
on particulate matter are similar to those set for new coal plants being built
today. The limits on CO2 are similar to the pollution from a natural gas plant.
“That means essentially
shut down the coal plants and start over,” energy-company spokesman Doug
McFarlan warned WBEZ Chicago.
Right. And the downside
would be?
Here’s the upside: Those
two plants are linked to more than 40 deaths, 550 emergency room visits, and
2,800 asthma attacks annually, according to a 2002 Harvard School of
Public Health study. The asthma hospitalization rate in Chicago is nearly
double the national average [PDF].
It’s not clear that Moore’s
proposal will go anywhere, and Mayor Richard Daley’s skepticism can’t be good
for its chances. Daley says the city lacks authority over power plant emissions, although the EPA in 2008 directed the city to improve its lackluster air quality.
Putting real pressure
on city coal plants would take Daley a long way toward his public goal of making Chicago a
leader in fighting climate change. A Chicago Tribune investigation last year found that Daley’s climate plan leaned heavily on
buying carbon offsets; 87 percent of them sent money to an existing wood-burning
power plant in North Carolina and didn’t help finance any new renewable energy
projects.
Related Links:
How green are Obama’s potential Supreme Court picks?
Sens. Kerry and Graham to unveil climate bill next week
Chinese ship gouged two-mile scar in Great Barrier Reef