Same hits, different day
Reading “Graffiti Vandals Cost Public Millions” left me thinking: Here is the manifestation of the definition of insanity, doing the same thing over and over while expecting a different result. Why would any taxpayer want his or her money spent on such a “program”?
It has been proved time and again that a reactive stance does not begin to approach solving the problem. A proactive program has been proved over time to be the most cost-effective, long-term solution that would reduce graffiti and improve the quality of life for our citizens.
I am a taxpayer, property owner raising a family in Seattle. I hate seeing waste and mismanagement. I know the intention is there, but the delivery is misguided.
— Laurie Rasmussen, Goodbye Graffiti, Seattle