First there were kingdoms around the continent made up of different Ethnicities. Some were arch rivals, some were advanced( comparing to their neighboring kingdoms) than others.
Then came Imperial Euros. they slit up all these kingdoms and put pieces from many different Ethnics together ( well, divide , conquer, rule.)No wonder we saw Biafra issue, in Zimbabwe ( Shona vs the rest) South africa Zulu vs the rest. Rwanda, Burundi ( Hutu and Tutsis) , Uganda( Nilotes vs the Rest) Ethiopia vs Somalis( Ogaden issue) Sudan we know whats up. Cote d’Ivoire we know whats up. and some places today are still ethnic time bombs, waiting to explode.
Then they left these make up nations confused, they lost their monarchy rule systems, they adopted Repablican styles that they never understood in the first place. lol.( No wonder we have had presidents that never want to leave power, Monarchy mentalities are still in their blood, brain, minds and spirits).lol.
It been proven over and over,. Some nations still have Ethnic based parties, some don’t and some are still blood baths. some have gotten over .
Many were just united against their Common enemy( Colonists) after that , each supposed to go their own way. but didn’t and many places ended up as bloody worlds.
My Question is. Do you think if these ethnic,kingdoms were left as they were found it would have been positive and not as much failures today?
I think so yes, many nations would have been way better of if they were never separated. I think this led to blood baths and some are still doing bloody because of this failed Ethnic, kingdoms Chemistry.
What do you think?
Butembo21,