We were just discussing whether or not a school can punish students for their social networking activity, and now we’ve got two legal rulings on the subject. Unfortunately, they seem to conflict with each other, despite coming from the same appeals circuit!
Both cases involved students creating fake MySpace profiles of the schools’ principals. Both students were punished, but in one case the court said the school went too far (“Public schools are vital institutions, but their reach is not unlimited…”) while the other said it was fine (“We decline to say that simply because the disruption to the learning environment originates from a computer located off campus, the school should be left powerless to discipline the student.”). The difference appears to be that in the latter case, the school claimed that the fake profile resulted in disruption in the classroom because “students were talking about the profile rather than paying attention to class.”
That seems like a pretty fine line, because now a school will have to do is suggest that students in the school were discussing an activity that took place outside of school to allow the school to punish the student for off-campus speech. From a First Amendment standpoint, that seems pretty difficult to accept — and certainly seems to go against the principles set forth by the famous Tinker decision concerning free speech rights of students on campus.
Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
