Do Americans really make the connection between transportation, oil use, and environmental impacts?

by Stephen Davis

The
national poll that Transportation for
America
released this week makes it clear that Americans are overwhelmingly
in favor of increasing our access to transportation options, no matter where
they live in America—big cities, suburbs, small towns, or rural areas. The
majority believes that their community—and the country as a whole—would
benefit from an expanded and improved
public transportation system including rail and buses
.

Americans
not only underestimate how much of their tax dollars actually go to
roads and bridges, 58 percent think we should be spending more of those
dollars on public transportation and expanding other options
. This is
certainly encouraging news, and it shows just how disconnected a lot of D.C.
policymakers are from what Americans really want.

But why do Americans think we need to increase spending on public transportation and
ensure that more Americans have access to different ways to get around? 

Well,
one thing we learned is that it’s not to
prevent global warming
. Among a lot of very good reasons to provide more
options, global warming ranked last, with a bare majority of 52 percent seeing
it as a likely outcome. That’s not too surprising: even many environmentally
minded folks don’t automatically make the connection between having options to
drive less and reduced emissions. The evidence to make that case is
accumulating rapidly, but it gets much less discussion than fancy hybrid
vehicles or dreams of cleaner fuels. And global warming skeptics don’t buy any
of it, of course.

Our
past polling has shown that nearly everyone cares about oil dependency,
however.

Somewhat
surprisingly, then, reducing oil dependency only did slightly better than
global warming as a rationale for more, and cleaner, transportation options.
One obvious reason is that most people don’t realize that the lion’s share of
our oil consumption is for transportation. Once they’re told that 70 percent of oil consumption goes to
motoring around
, support for reduced oil use as a rationale leaps to nearly
two-thirds—and this crosses party and
geographic lines
. And when they’re
subsequently asked which of many potential outcomes would be the best reason to support expanded options,
reducing our dependence on foreign oil
tops the list
.

So
what’s the lesson? We all need to start talking about the 70 percent solution
to oil dependency: reducing the amount
we burn for transportation
. There are three ways to do it: More efficient vehicles,
renewable and/or diversified fuel sources, and spending less time driving
around. The technology for the first two is in development, while the
technology for the last has existed in one form or another for many, many
years. Walkable neighborhoods, streetcars,
light rail, buses, and safe streets for walking can work in tandem with newer
technologies such as broadband internet and wireless networks, to make it
possible for people to avoid some trips, take others by transit, foot or bike—and still drive their hybrids when it makes sense to do so.

Do
American voters need to understand all this to strongly support a federal
transportation program that invests substantially in providing these less
oil-consumptive options? Well, it wouldn’t hurt, but as the poll shows, people
have plenty of other good reasons as it is.

“If
Americans themselves were crafting the transportation bill,” T4 America
co-chair Geoff Anderson said yesterday, “we would see a doubling of the share for public transportation; an
ironclad system of accountability for restoring existing roads and bridges
before simply building more of them; and a strong commitment to making all
our streets safe enough for kids to bicycle to school or so seniors can walk
to nearby restaurants or the drug store
.”

Talking about
transportation on terms that Americans relate to strongly will help us move the
debate forward, and more importantly, start building the kind of transportation
system that Americans overwhelmingly want and need.

Stephen Davis is the Online Coordinator for Transportation
for America Campaign (T4).

David Goldberg is the communications director for
Transportation for America Campaign (T4) and Smart Growth America.

Related Links:

How to improve a Hummer’s mileage and add retro style

Everything you need to know about Obama’s new fuel-economy rules

Energy Independence Through Greater Addiction