Author: Serkadis

  • Saab CEO and Board Replaced

    Saab has just made another step towards its full closure after General Motors named Stephen Taylor and Peter Torngren as wind-down supervisors of Saab, thus replacing both CEO Jan Ake Jonsson and the company’s entire board. Additionally, General Motors also emphasized in a statement that it is willing to listen to any offers for Saab, although it has already started the winding down process.

    "As stated previously, the wind-down process is expected to take several months, and will ensure … (read more)

  • France Warns Renault on Turkey Move

    Following last week’s rumors surrounding a possible shift in the production of some Renault models from France to Turkey, the French government reacted and warned the carmaker not to proceed with its plans if they are to lead to local job losses.

    "Renault is not just any ordinary company – the state holds 15% and we are not going to be spectators because this is a company that has received a lot of assistance during the crisis," employment minister Laurent Wauquiez told RTL radio, … (read more)

  • Chrysler Group Receives Diversity Leadership Award

    The 14th Annual Urban Wheels Awards held in Detroit in conjunction with NAIAS 2010 honored diversity in the automotive industry yesterday, and Chrysler Group was one of those awarded. The company received the Diversity Leadership Award, while the 2010 Ram Heavy Duty truck was honored as a "Finalist" for Urban Truck of the Year.

    "Despite many challenges, Chrysler Group has maintained a leadership commitment to promote diversity throughout our business enterprise," Fred M. D… (read more)

  • Google’s Nexus One phone sells a mere 20,000 in its first week

    flurry nexus oneThe Google Nexus One sold an estimated 20,000 units in its first week, according to market analytics firm Flurry.

    Although the Nexus One received a lot of buzz as Google’s own entry into the Android phone business, the sales number isn’t that impressive. We’ll see if Google actually confirms or disputes this number.

    Flurry monitors the usage of more than 10,000 developer applications on iPhone and Android platforms. It tracks over 25 million end user sessions per month. From that, it was able to figure out the first week sales for the Nexus One as well as prior phone launches such as the myTouch 3G, Droid, and iPhone 3GS. The iPhone 3GS sold more than a million units over the first three days of sales in June, 2009. The Droid, an Android phone built by Motorola and launched in November, sold 250,000 units in its first week, more than 12 times as much as the Nexus One.

    The Nexus One may seem like a dud. It has gotten good reviews for features such as Google Voice and Google Maps. But Flurry notes that it hasn’t lived up to the early expectations, and distribution, pricing, and marketing have not been aggressive.  While Verizon spent $100 million marketing the Droid, Google sold its device directly to consumers via its own web site. Google also launched after the holidays.

    T-Mobile, the carrier partner for Nexus One, did not provide the same carrier co-marketing support as it did for the myTouch 3G launch. And Google has set its direct-to-consumer price for the Nexus One at over $500.


    Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]

    Read Original Article

  • Nintendo finally gets Netflix movies on the Wii

    nintendoIn case you needed one more place to get Netflix videos: now you can use your Nintendo Wii game console to watch them.

    It’s a little hard to get excited about this. Netflix is available on a wide variety of set-top boxes such as Roku, and it is being built into many connected TVs that are selling this year. It has been on the Xbox 360 game console’s Xbox Live service for more than a year, and it recently became available on the Sony PlayStation 3.

    This is an odd place for Nintendo to be, since the company has generally looked down on Sony and Microsoft and their thinly disguised ambitions of taking over the entirety of living room entertainment. Nintendo executives have often insisted that their consoles are all about games.

    By letting users watch movies, Nintendo is buying into the argument that people want more out of their game consoles as a bridge between TV and online multimedia. The Nintendo Wii can’t even play DVD movies, nor does it have storage capacity to store movies. But now Wii owners with a broadband connection and at least a $9-per-month Netflix subscription will be able to use the online service for watching Netflix movies.

    Nintendo users will have to put a Netflix disc into their consoles while they watch, as is the case with Sony’s PS 3. The Wii can’t do high-definition video. In that sense, this service seems to call out the Wii’s weaknesses. But there are a lot of Wii’s out there. More than 60 million have sold worldwide. [art credit: gadget review]


    Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]

    Read Original Article

  • Five companies create United Nations Citizens virtual world

    un 3Cisco Systems, Equifax and three smaller companies have partnered to create United Nations Citizens, a virtual world that has a real economy and is geared toward enabling a virtual shopping mall.

    The virtual world lets consumers create their own 3-D avatars to shop with or hold down jobs inside the virtual environment. Numerous partners have invested millions of dollars into the technologies that provide electronic commerce companies with the ability to conduct transactions in the world. Besides Cisco and Equifax, partners include Heads & Tails TV, Faithful Friends TV & Montage Systems.

    un 4United Nations Citizens enables online commissioned sales assistants and paid greeters to become faithful friends helping consumers with questions and purchases. Those assistants can sell the products and services of more than 330 name brand retailers. The world is a place where people can hold down good paying jobs, says Anthony Loiacono, CEO at Heads & Tails TV. The companies say the graphics will be stellar, using the core animation engine behind the film Avatar. But I can’t tell. This could be sterile or cool.

    un 1The world has features such as high-definition television screens inside the world where consumers can watch movies or branded advertising. There are opportunities inside the world to promote local events such as high school sports, festivals, fashion shows, and more. On paper, it sounds a lot like Sony’s Home virtual world on the PlayStation 3 or Linden Labs’ Second Life. About 330 retail brands are participating, including Apple iTunes, Microsoft Store, Walmart, and Sky Mall.

    If the in-world avatars do a good job selling merchandise from those brands, then the people operating the avatars can be paid.The 3-D world will offer lots of ways for the products and services to be merchandised in a way that mirrors the real world. But this world is all digital, so it will be easy to collect analytics data.


    Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]

    Read Original Article

  • Spyker to Buy Saab in Days or Give Up

    The talks between Spyker and Saab have apparently reached the boiling point and the Dutch carmaker isn’t willing to wait for a GM decision anymore. Spyker CEO Victor Muller said in a statement that he expects to reach a deal in a few days or the Dutch company might walk away from the talks.

    There is a point in time where we would say, ‘This is not for us,’ Muller said at the Automotive News World Congress. The last time I looked, which was a half hour ago, we were in the mi… (read more)

  • Molecular Manufacturing

    In fairness to all, nanotechnology is in early days.  We are seeing a lot of exciting proof of principal type work.

     

    We can make some predictions.

     

    We need an engineering template idea similar to the integrated circuit to organize and use this knowledge.  Otherwise we will be studying thousands of noncompatible dead ends.  Right now we do not know if this is possible.  This template system is likely to be three dimensional.

     

    Our capabilities will swiftly surpass anything imagined by Mother Nature.  This is important because Mother Nature has actually built out with a lot of constraints that is could not work around easily.  We actually have the option of introducing exotic combinations that super perform.

     

    In short, expect to be surprised and surprised and surprised.

     

    This NRC report is attempting to establish a focus and support system within the community to ease the process.  I think that we still need much more data and conferences to settle directions.  Again this is early days and this process has likely decades to develop.  Right now we want to avoid closing off any avenues.

     

    Molecular Manufacturing:

     

    http://metamodern.com/2010/01/07/molecular-manufacturing-the-nrc-study-and-its-recommendations/

     

    The NRC study and its recommendations

     

    by ERIC DREXLER on JANUARY 7, 2010
    Part 6 of a series prompted by the recent 50th anniversary of Feynman’s historic talk, “There’s Plenty of Room at the Bottom”. This is arguably the most important post of the series, or of this blog to date.
    Topics:
    The most credible study of molecular manufacturing to date
    The study’s recommendations for Federal research support
    The current state of progress toward implementation
    The critical problem: not science, but institutions and focus
    Committee to Review the National Nanotechnology Initiative, National Research Council
    A formal, Federal-level study has examined the physical principles of high-throughput atomically precise manufacturing (aka molecular manufacturing), assessing its feasibility and closing with a call for experimental research.
    Surprisingly, this recommendation smacks of heresy in some circles, and the very idea of examining the subject met strong opposition.
    The process in outline: Congress voted to direct the U.S. National Research Council,the working arm of the U.S. National Academies, to conduct, as part of the lengthy Triennial Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative, what in the House version had been described as a “Study on molecular manufacturing…to determine the technical feasibility of the manufacture of materials and devices at the molecular scale”, and in response, the NRC convened a study committee that organized a workshop, examined the literature, deliberated, and reported their conclusions, recommending appropriate research directions for moving the field forward, including experimental research directed toward development of molecular manufacturing.
    NRC studies are not haphazard processes, and the National Academies website describes its procedures in substantial detail. Because the NRC often advises the Federal government on politically charged questions, “Checks and balances are applied at every step in the study process to protect the integrity of the reports and to maintain public confidence in them.” These include independent scientific review of reports that are themselves the product of independent experts assembled with attention to potential conflicts of interest.
    It’s worth taking a moment to compare the NRC to the three previous leading sources of information on molecular manufacturing: committed advocates, committed critics, and self-propagating mythologies. None of these is remotely comparable. Unless one has studied the topic closely and in technical detail, it seems reasonable to adopt the committee’s conclusions as a rough-draft version of reality, and to proceed from there.
    Here are some excerpts that I think deserve special emphasis, followed by the concluding paragraph of the report:
    Technical Feasibility of Site-Specific Chemistry for Large-Scale Manufacturing
    The proposed manufacturing systems can be viewed as highly miniaturized, highly articulated versions of today’s scanning probe systems, or perhaps as engineered ribosome-like systems…

    …The technical arguments make use of accepted scientific knowledge but constitute a “theoretical analysis demonstrating the possibility of a class of as-yet unrealizable devices.”22

    Construction of extended structures with three-dimensional covalent bonding may be easy to conceive and might be readily accomplished, but only by using tools that do not yet exist.25 In other words, the tool structures and other components cannot yet be built, but they can be computationally modeled.


    [ … concluding paragraph:]

    Although theoretical calculations can be made today, the eventually attainable range of chemical reaction cycles, error rates, speed of operation, and thermodynamic efficiencies of such bottom-up manufacturing systems cannot be reliably predicted at this time. Thus, the eventually attainable perfection and complexity of manufactured products, while they can be calculated in theory, cannot be predicted with confidence. Finally, the optimum research paths [to advanced systems] cannot be reliably predicted at this time. Research funding that is based on the ability of investigators to produce experimental demonstrations that link to abstract models and guide long-term vision is most appropriate to achieve this goal.
    22. K.E. Drexler. 1992. Nanosystems, Molecular Machinery, Manufacturing and Computation. New York: Wiley & Sons.

    25. M. Rieth and W. Schommers, eds. 2005. Handbook of Computational and Theoretical Nanotechnology. American Scientific Publishers.

    My summary in a nutshell:

    The committee examined the concept of advanced molecular manufacturing, and found that the analysis of its physical principles is based on accepted scientific knowledge, and that it addresses the major technical questions. However, in the committee’s view, theoretical calculations are insufficient: Only experimental research can reliably answer the critical questions and move the technology toward implementation. Research in this direction deserves support.
    \
    I should note that the tone of the report is skeptical, emphasizing what the committee [correctly] sees as the unusual approach and the [resulting,methodologically inherent] incompleteness of the results. A quick skim could easily suggest a negative assessment. A closer reading, however, shows that points raised are in the end presented, not as errors, nor even as specific, concrete weaknesses in the analysis, but instead as work not yet done, motivating the development of a research program directed toward validating and achieving the proposed technological objectives.

    The call for research

    The report closes with a call for research on pathways toward molecular manufacturing, quoted above, and an earlier section outlines some appropriate objectives:
    To bring this field forward, meaningful connections are needed between the relevant scientific communities. Examples include:
    Delineating desirable research directions not already being pursued by the biochemistry community;
    Defining and focusing on some basic experimental steps that are critical to advancing long-term goals; and
    Outlining some “proof-of-principle” studies that, if successful, would provide knowledge or engineering demonstrations of key principles or components with immediate value.

    The response and progress

    The technology roadmap

     

    Research directions toward molecular manufacturing have been charted in the subsequent Technology Roadmap for Productive Nanosystems, the result of a project led by the Battelle Memorial Institute, the manager of research at U.S. National Laboratories that include Pacific Northwest, Oak Ridge, and Brookhaven. These labs hosted several Roadmap workshops and provided many of the participating scientists and engineers; I served as the lead technical consultant for the project.
    The Roadmap is responsive to the NRC request above, and recommends research that includes work along the lines I describe below.

    Molecular engineering methodologies

     

    The crucial research objective is the development of systematic experimental and design methodologies that enable the fabrication of large, multicomponent, atomically precise nanostructures by means of self-assembly. This research direction fits the NRC committee’s criteria: it is, by nature, strongly experimental, and in mimicking macromolecular structures and processes in biology, it holds promise for near-term biomedical applications.

    Structural DNA nanotechnology

     

    In the year the NRC report reached print, a Nature paper reported a breakthrough-level development, “DNA origami”. This technology opened the door to systematic, atomically precise engineering on a scale of hundreds of nanometers and millions of atoms.
    Since then, we’ve seen rapid progress in structural DNA nanotechnology. I discussed recent landmark achievements here and here.

    Polypeptide foldamer nanotechnology

     

    There’s also been rapid progress in design methodologies for complex, atomically precise nanoscale structures made from polypeptide foldamers (aka proteins). In recent years, protein engineering has achieved a functional milestone: systematically engineering devices that perform controlled molecular transformations (see“Computational tools for designing and engineering biocatalysts”).

    Framework-directed assembly of composite systems

     

    Looking forward, promising next steps involve integrating structural DNA frameworks with polypeptide foldamers, other foldamers, and other organic and inorganic materials. These classes of components have complementary properties (as discussed in my comments on “Modular Molecular Composite Nanosystems”).

    Why these developments are important

     

    As is now well recognized, “existing biological systems for protein fabrication could be harnessed to produce nanoscale molecular machines with designed functions” (“Computational protein design promises to revolutionize protein engineering”). Further, as biological systems demonstrate, programmable molecular machine systems can be harnessed to build programmable molecular machine systems.
    As I’ve discussed, this capability could be exploited to pursue a spiral of improvement in materials, components, and molecular machine systems.

    The path ahead

     

    This spiral of development, in which molecular tools are used to construct more capable next-generation molecular tools, could be exploited to develop products with expanding applications, falling cost, and increasing value.
    As I discussed in “Making vs. Modeling: A paradox of progress in nanotechnology”,each generation of tools can be expected to enable fabrication processes and products that are more robust, more susceptible to computational simulation, and better suited to established systems engineering design methodologies. This indicates the potential for an accelerating pace of development toward a technology platform that can support the implementation of high-throughput atomically precise fabrication.
    This path is being followed today, yet the level of support and organization, of mission and urgency, does not come close to matching its potential for solving long-term yet urgent problems.

     

    Appropriate and inappropriate responses to the NRC report on molecular manufacturing

    The evaluation of the feasibility of molecular manufacturing and recommendations for research form the concluding section of the body of the NRC’s Triennial Review of the National Nanotechnology Initiative. In the three years since the publication of the NRC report, I have seen no document from a Federal-level source that acknowledges these conclusions, and, of course, none that offers a substantive response.
    This is of concern, because the NRC report calls for a sharp break with past thinking. To put it bluntly, much of the opinion in general circulation about molecular manufacturing (both pro and con) is rubbish because it is based on mythology, and not on the scientific literature. The NRC report can be criticized on several points, but it isn’t rubbish.

    Fulfilling the initial promise of nanotechnology

     

    Atomically precise fabrication technologies exist today, and as I have noted,advanced atomically precise fabrication is the promise that initially defined the field of nanotechnology. I believe the record shows that advanced atomically precise fabrication is also the promise that got it funded.
    Building on recent advances, strategically targeted research in atomically precise fabrication could draw on and contribute to fields across the spectrum of modern nanotechnologies, from materials to deviced, and could bring them together to elevate the technology platform for further advances. Ultimately, as the NRC report suggests, those advances could potentially deliver what was promised at the inception of the field.
    Make no mistake: the path to high-throughput atomically precise manufacturing will not be short, and it will not be direct. It will be a multi-stage development process, and as I have discussed, the early steps differ greatly from the ultimate results in both their form and their potential applications.

    Growing urgency

     

    Today, the potential promise of high-throughput atomically precise manufacturing must be regarded as credible. As a consequence of its inherent productive capacity, it offers a credible potential solution to problems of energy production and climate change. The National Research Council of the U.S. National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine has called for the support of research explicitly directed toward the development of this technology. This has become urgent.

    The strength and limitations of current research support

     

    It is both laudable and problematic that the research I’ve reported above is chiefly funded by programs in biology and medicine. This support has enabled great progress, and I know from long discussion that researchers in these areas have ambitious visions for the future. There are, however, limits to what can be achieved while developing molecular engineering within the framework of biotechnology, much as there would have been if aeronautical engineering research had been developed as a field of ornithology.
    The critical need today is not for new scientific results, but for an integrative approach to molecular systems engineering, directed toward strategic technology objectives. The science is ready. The institutions are not.

     

    A word to readers:

     

    The implications of the NRC report call for reconsidering views that have shaped policy in the research disciplines critical to progress toward molecular manufacturing, yet like many other NRC reports, it is virtually unknown. Directing other readers to what I have written here could help to remedy this problem.
    (And a further note to readers who are bursting with frustration: Please don’t. It is counterproductive, and generates far more heat than light.)
    Note: I say in the first paragraph that Congress voted for “…what in the House version had been described as a ‘Study on molecular manufacturing…to determine the technical feasibility of the manufacture of materials and devices at the molecular scale’” to reflect an oddity of the legislative history behind the study: After the House transmitted the bill to the Senate, a nanotechnology business association successfully lobbied to replace “molecular manufacturing”, thereby calling for a (puzzling) “Study on molecular self-assembly”. An uproar followed. In the end, the NRC did a study of molecular self-assembly, as directed in the final bill, but also responded to the request by the House for a study of molecular manufacturing. In the end, molecular manufacturing dominated the agenda of the workshop. [I corrected the main text and this description after reviewing the GPO documents, several hours after the initial posting.]
    In a later section, I note that “I have seen no document from a Federal-level source that acknowledges these conclusions”. There is, in fact, a document that quotes from the conclusions, but the quoted material is edited in a way that wrongly indicates that the recommendations regarding molecular manufacturing are, instead, recommendations regarding molecular self-assembly (see “The National Nanotechnology Initiative: Second Assessment and Recommendations of the National Nanotechnology Advisory Panel”, p.43).
    [Dec 8: Updated to add the paragraph beginning “I should note that the tone of the report is skeptical…” I would expect this tone to strongly influence the impression left on casual readers, blunting the impact of what, in substance, amounts to a sharp rebuke to the conventional wisdom.]
    An open comment thread for this post can be found here.
  • Netgear’s Push2TV wireless TV adapter caught nonchalantly hanging out in the wild

    Interested in getting prepared for all your Wireless Display (WiDi) needs? Looks like Netgear’s Push2TV wireless TV adapter is already on the shelves of at least one Best Buy, right in front of a $99 price tag that matches the press release from before. The back of the box photo, seen after the break, doesn’t shed any new light on the device. Unless you’re really into (near term) future proofing of your wireless display needs, it might be best to wait for a few more options when it comes to fancy-schmancy new compatible machines.

    [Thanks, Colin]

    Continue reading Netgear’s Push2TV wireless TV adapter caught nonchalantly hanging out in the wild

    Netgear’s Push2TV wireless TV adapter caught nonchalantly hanging out in the wild originally appeared on Engadget on Wed, 13 Jan 2010 03:21:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink   |   | Email this | Comments

    Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]

    Article

  • John Booth Replaced Alex Tai as Virgin Racing Team Principal

    Virgin Racing started doing some reorganizing of themselves lately, despite the fact that they’ve just officially launched the Formula One team less than a month ago. Consequently, the former Manor Grand Prix boss John Booth will take over from Alex Tai as team principal as of this morning.

    According to a press release issued by the Virgin Racing organization, the move was intended to fully addressing the complexity and challenges of the new business and to creating a team with th… (read more)

  • New Race Series for 2010: the Sir Stirling Moss Trophy

    Motor Racing Legends launched a new racing series for 2010, which will be based on the existing BRDC Historic Sportscars series but extend the entry criteria to include GTs, as well as sportscars and sports-racers. Dubbed the Sir Stirling Moss Trophy, the series was inspired by the success of the one-off race held at the Algarve in October, featuring pre-1961 sportscars and sports-racers.

    The reaction from competitors to the Sir Stirling Moss Trophy race at the Algarve was overwhe… (read more)

  • How Did Anne Frank Die?

    Anne Frank was born on the 12th of June in the year 1929, she was a European Jewish Girl who was born in Germany and had become stateless since the year 1941. However it is said that Anne Frank claimed to be Dutch as she grew up in the Netherlands. The little girl known as Anne Frank became very famous after her death with the release of her diary which was titled as “Anne Frank: The Diary of a Little Girl”.

    Anne Frank contracted the disease of Scabies while in the concentration camp. However later she was moved to the Bergen Bel sen, around more than 8000 women were included in this transport. Anne was later re united with her sister ‘Margot’ in this camp and was concerned about her health as she couldn’t even walk.

    Later in the march of 1945 a typhus epidemic broke out in the camp which killed around 17,000 prisoners, Margot was one of the prisoners who passed away in this typhus wave…a few days later even Anne Frank Succumbed to the disease and passed away.

  • Carbon Dioxide Optimization

    This is a pretty good review of carbon dioxide and its role in the climate of Earth.  Now that the political version of climate science has been exposed as largely bogus, a lot of the contradictory voices are swiftly getting published and gaining an audience.
    A lot of this we already know but the clear take-home message is that the geological record supports CO2 levels at 1000 ppm as likely the best overall level for supporting our ecosystem.  It may turn out that the ongoing recovery from the ice age is actually promoting a return to that effective level.  We have many centuries to go yet.
    What is been buried is the curious hypothesis that rising CO2 is driving global warming.  It simply is not.  There might be a contribution, but we cannot even show that.  Right now the folks here have satisfied themselves that such contribution is clearly negligible.
    The climate certainly varies and often surprises.  We presently have been riding through a peak cosmic ray flux which argued this early fall for a miserable winter.  Thus we could predict a miserable winter.   So far we have been having a miserable winter that certainly is not disappointing our predictions.  
    Steven D.Levittand Stephen J. Dubner: The green gadflys
    Posted:January 07, 2010, 10:30 AM by NP Editor
    Not so many years ago, schoolchildren were taught that carbon dioxide is the naturally occurring lifeblood of plants, just as oxygen is ours. Today, children are more likely to think of carbon dioxide as a poison. That’s because the amount of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere has increased substantially over the past 100 years, from about 280 parts per million to 380.
    But what people don’t know, say the scientists at Intellectual Ventures labs in Bellevue, Wash., is that the carbon dioxide level some 80 million years ago — back when our mammalian ancestors were evolving — was at least 1,000 parts per million. In fact, that is the concentration of carbon dioxide you regularly breathe if you work in a new energy-efficient office building, for that is the level established by the engineering group that sets standards for heating and ventilation systems.
    So not only is carbon dioxide plainly not poisonous, but changes in carbon dioxide levels don’t necessarily mirror human activity. Nor does atmospheric carbon dioxide necessarily warm the earth: Ice-cap evidence shows that over the past several hundred thousand years, carbon dioxide levels have risen after a rise in temperature, not the other way around.
    Meet Ken Caldeira, a soft-spoken man with a boyish face and a halo of curly hair. He runs an ecology lab at Stanford University for the Carnegie Institution. Caldeira is among the most respected climate scientists in the world, his research cited approvingly by the most fervent environmentalists. He and a co-author coined the phrase “ocean acidification,” the process by which the seas absorb so much carbon dioxide that corals and other shallow-water organisms are threatened. He also contributes research to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, which shared the 2007 Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore for sounding the alarm on global warming.
    If you met Caldeira at a party, you would likely place him in the fervent-environmentalist camp himself. He was a philosophy major in college, for goodness’ sake, and his very name — a variant of caldera, the crater-like rim of a volcano— aligns him with the natural world. In his youth (he is 53 now), he was a hard-charging environmental activist and all-around peacenik.
    Caldeira is thoroughly convinced that human activity is responsible for some global warming and is pessimistic about how future climate will affect humankind. He believes that “we are being incredibly foolish emitting carbon dioxide” as we currently do.
    Yet his research tells him that carbon dioxide is not the right villain in this fight. For starters, as greenhouse gases go, it’s not particularly efficient. “A doubling of carbon dioxide traps less than 2% of the outgoing radiation emitted by the earth,” he says. Furthermore, atmospheric carbon dioxide is governed by the law of diminishing returns: Each gigaton added to the air has less radiative impact than the previous one.
    Caldeira mentions a study he undertook that considered the impact of higher carbon dioxide levels on plant life. While plants get their water from the soil, they get their food — carbon dioxide, that is — from the air. An increase in carbon dioxide means that plants require less water to grow.
    Caldeira’s study showed that doubling the amount of carbon dioxide while holding steady all other inputs— water, nutrients and so forth— yields a 70% increase in plant growth, an obvious boon to agricultural productivity.
    “That’s why most commercial hydroponic green houses have supplemental carbon dioxide,” a colleague says. “And they typically run at 1,400 parts per million.”
    “Twenty thousand years ago,” Caldeira says, “carbon dioxide levels were lower, sea level was lower — and trees were in a near state of asphyxiation for lack of carbon dioxide. There’s nothing special about today’s carbon dioxide level, or today’s sea level, or today’s temperature. What damages us are rapid rates of change. Overall, more carbon dioxide is probably a good thing for the biosphere — it’s just that it’s increasing too fast.”
    The gentlemen of Intellectual Ventures abound with further examples of global warming memes that are all wrong.
    Rising sea levels, for instance, “aren’t being driven primarily by glaciers melting,” Lowell Wood says, no matter how useful that image may be for environmental activists. The truth is far less sexy. “It is driven mostly by water-warming — literally, the thermal expansion of ocean water as it warms up.”
    Sea levels are rising, Wood says — and have been for roughly 12,000 years, since the end of the last ice age. The oceans are about 425 feet higher today, but the bulk of that rise occurred in the first thousand years. In the past century, the seas have risen less than eight inches.
    As to the future: Rather than the catastrophic 30-foot rise some people have predicted over the next century — goodbye, Florida! — Wood notes that the most authoritative literature on the subject suggests a rise of about one and a half feet by 2100. That’s much less than the twice-daily tidal variation in most coastal locations. “So it’s a little bit difficult,” he says, “to understand what the purported crisis is about.”
    Caldeira, with something of a pained look on his face, mentions a most surprising environmental scourge: trees. Yes, trees. As much as Caldeira personally lives the green life — his Stanford office is cooled by a misting water chamber rather than air conditioning — his research has found that planting trees in certain locations actually exacerbates warming because comparatively dark leaves absorb more incoming sunlight than, say, grassy plains, sandy deserts or snow-covered expanses.
    Then there’s this little-discussed fact about global warming: While the drumbeat of doom has grown louder over the past several years, the average global temperature during that time has in fact decreased.
    In the darkened conference room, Intellectual Ventures co-founder Nathan Myhrvold cues up an overhead slide that summarizes IV’s views of the current slate of proposed global warming solutions. The slide says:
    • Too little
    • Too late
    • Too optimistic
    Too little means that typical conservation efforts simply won’t make much of a difference. “If you believe there’s a problem worth solving,” Myhrvold says, “then these solutions won’t be enough to solve it. Wind power and most other alternative energy things are cute, but they don’t scale to a sufficient degree. At this point, wind farms are a government subsidy scheme, fundamentally.”
    What about the beloved Prius and other low-emission vehicles? “They’re great,” he says, “except that transportation is just not that big of a sector.”
    Also, coal is so cheap that trying to generate electricity without it would be economic suicide, especially for developing countries. Myhrvold argues that cap-and-trade agreements, whereby coal emissions are limited by quota and cost, can’t help much, in part because it is already …
    Too late. The half-life of atmospheric carbon dioxide is roughly one hundred years, and some of it remains in the atmosphere for thousands of years. So even if humankind immediately stopped burning all fossil fuel, the existing carbon dioxide would remain in the atmosphere for several generations. Pretend the United States (and perhaps Europe) miraculously converted overnight and became zero-carbon societies. Then pretend they persuaded China (and perhaps India) to demolish every coal-burning power plant and diesel truck. As far as atmospheric carbon dioxide is concerned, it might not matter all that much. And by the way, that zero-carbon society you were dreamily thinking about is way …
    Too optimistic. “A lot of the things that people say would be a good thing probably aren’t,” Myhrvold says. As an example, he points to solar power. “The problem with solar cells is that they’re black, because they are designed to absorb light from the sun. But only about 12% gets turned into electricity, and the rest is reradiated as heat — which contributes to global warming.”
    Although a widespread conversion to solar power might seem appealing, the reality is tricky. The energy consumed by building the thousands of new solar plants necessary to replace coal-burning and other power plants would create a huge long-term “warming debt,” as Myhrvold calls it. “Eventually, we’d have a great carbon-free energy infrastructure but only after making emissions and global warming worse every year until we’re done building out the solar plants, which could take 30 to 50 years.”

    FromSuperFreakonomicsby Steven D.Levittand Stephen J. Dubner. Copyright © 2009 by Steven D.Levittand Stephen J. Dubner. Published with arrangement by HarperCollinsCanada

  • Official: Flavio Manzoni Becomes Ferrari’s Chief Designer

    Flavio Manzoni has been appointed Director of Design at Ferrari. The news in not new, as this decision was previously known, but the information is now officially confirmed.

    Manzoni will have the task of defining the visual identity of all future Ferrari cars. He will report directly to Amedeo Felisa, Ferrari’s CEO. (invested in March 2008)

    The designer, now 45, has a degree in architecture, with a specialization in industrial design. He began his career in the Fia… (read more)

  • McDowell Goes with MacDonald for 2010 Nationwide

    MacDonald Motorsports signed the no. 13 in the Nationwide Series standings in 2009, Michael McDowell, as the driver for the No. 81 Dodge for the 2010 Nationwide season. The choice comes to back the changes made by the team to realign itself with the demands of the day.

    "The current state of the economy gives us an opportunity to be more competitive against larger teams than ever before," Randy MacDonald, the team’s owner said. "This year, our focus is different.&quo… (read more)

  • Alzheimer Advance

    This is a promising experimental protocol that may lead to exact knowledge of the underlying issues and perhaps from there to actual treatment.  I have never thought the disease was anything like intractable like our old enemy cancer.  It really begged recognizing a specific failure similar to insulin failure in diabetes.  This protocol allows us to ask questions and easily test interventions.

     

    A pathway exists that is not yet understood.  I hope progress is now swift.  This disease is not just personally tragic; it imposes a huge healthcare burden that needs to be ameliorated.  We want the elderly to retain personal independence to the end. This also suggests that progress may be possible on comparable ailments for the same reasons.

     

     

    University of Central Florida Alzheimer’s Discovery Could Lead to Long-sought Preventive Treatment

     

    The research was published in the science and medicine journal PLoS ONE, also demonstrates how the unique application of an existing cell research technique could accelerate the discovery of treatments to exploit the new findings.

    Most Alzheimer’s studies have focused on brain cells already damaged by amyloid-beta or the effects of high concentration of amyloid-beta. The University of Central Florida team, led by James Hickman, head of the UCF NanoScience Technology Center’s Hybrid Systems Laboratory, instead explored impacts of very low amyloid-beta concentrations on healthy cells in an effort to mimic the earlier stages of Alzheimer’s. The results were shocking.

    The UCF team found that over time, though there are no outward signs of damage, exposure to moderate amyloid-beta concentrations somehow prevents electrical signals from traveling normally through the cells. Because the effect is seen in otherwise healthy cells, Hickman believes the team may have uncovered a critical process in the progression of Alzheimer’s that could occur before a person shows any known signs of brain impairment.

    “What we’re claiming is that before you have any behavioral clues, these electrical transmission problems may be occurring,” he says.


    If this proves true, then the team has opened a promising potential path to an Alzheimer’s treatment that could block the onset of the mild cognitive impairment associated with early Alzheimer’s. In contrast, all currently available treatments manage symptoms of Alzheimer’s after they first appear — when it is likely too late for prevention.

    Kucku Varghese, a former graduate student in the Hickman lab now at the University of Florida, first demonstrated amyloid-beta’s effects at low concentrations on healthy cells using a common cell research method that is laborious and unsuitable for long-term experiments. But the Hickman team quickly moved to more advanced experiments using microelectrode arrays (MEA) to study the new finding. MEA studies use cultures of neurons on plates embedded with tiny electrodes that can send and measure electrical signals through nearby cells without damaging them, allowing extended experimentation.

    Hickman hopes to use MEAs and other tools to pinpoint the physiological and chemical changes within the brain cells that cause the loss of signal generation in healthy cells. Mechanisms responsible for the changes could offer potential targets for drugs, which pharmaceutical companies could search for using the MEA techniques demonstrated, and the mechanisms might provide a measurable target for early diagnosis of Alzheimer’s. 

    “We’re trying to find a marker that will lead to detection and treatment while slowing down Alzheimer’s progression and can really make a difference by delaying or even preventing onset of the disease,” says Hickman.

  • Toyota to Offer Brake Override Systems as Standard

    The Japanese manufacturer Toyota might have found the solution to fix its largest recall ever: installing brake override systems on all Toyota, Lexus and Scion models. Basically, such a system could prevent unintended acceleration, which proved to be the cause of several accidents and even deaths in the last months of 2009.

    At that time, a recall affecting 3.8 million Toyota and Lexus vehicle in the United States informed that certain models are equipped with incompatible floor ma… (read more)

  • Schumacher to Change Helmet Design in 2010

    Every time Michael Schumacher changed teams inside the Formula One Championship, the German driver chose to change his helmet livery in the process. Maybe not right away, but at some point he did do it. However, during the latest GP2 testing session at Jerez, the 41-year old was seen wearing the same bright-red helmet he used to have in his Ferrari days, which made everyone wonder why he doesn’t plan a new facelift helmet-wise.

    The answer was given by German publication Bild, whos… (read more)

  • Coulomb Level III Fast Charging Solution Announced

    Electric vehicle charging stations provider Coulomb announced it has partnered with Aker Wade Power Technologies for the deployment of Level III networked fast charging stations on a global level.

    Introduction of Level III charging stations broadens our product line so that we now offer Level I, Level II, and Level III stations, Coulomb Technologies CEO Richard Lowenthal said.

    This announcement is significant because the ChargePoint Network is quickly gaining a foo… (read more)