Author: Serkadis

  • Video purportedly shows Iranian police running over person at protest

    CNN
    Wednesday, Dec 30th, 2009

    An Internet video from what its posters said was one of the
    anti-government demonstrations last weekend in Iran shows police
    vehicles driving into crowds of protesters and running over at least
    one.

    In the video — shot Sunday, according to the posting on the
    Web site YouTube — green-and-white police trucks rush into crowds
    of protesters in the capital, Tehran. Demonstrators scatter, but one
    truck drives into a crowd trapped in a narrow street with a wall on one
    side and parked cars on the other.

    The camera follows the truck as it backs away, and a person briefly
    can be seen crumpled in the street where the truck had been. When the
    camera returns to the spot, another police truck drives over the
    person. Other protesters rush to the downed person’s aid; it was
    not clear whether that person was killed.

    CNN cannot confirm the authenticity of the video, or another one
    obtained by CNN that shows a woman who was reportedly killed when hit
    by a car driven by members of the Basij, an Iranian paramilitary group.
    That video shows protesters transferring her body from a clinic near
    where she was reportedly killed to another hospital to keep her remains
    out of reach of security forces.

    Full article here

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • Climategate: Actual “Global” Warming Only Affects 10 to 20% of World, Sometimes

    C3 Headlines
    Wednesday, Dec 30th, 2009

    Read here.
    There have been numerous revelations from the Climategate emails and
    files about climate scientists and the science that have truly been
    incredible, yet confirm what skeptics have long felt and thought. An
    example is the skeptics’ conclusion that global warming is not
    really “global” but more local in reality. Sure enough, a
    prominent IPCC climate scientist confirmed that conclusion in one of
    the Climategate emails:

    Even with the instrumental record, the early and late 20th century warming periods are only significant locally at between 10-20% of grid boxes.

    Of course, when you combine that statement with this other Climategate email statement by another prominent IPCC climate scientist, it’s not a surprise the public no longer believes these frauds and now questions the veracity of scientists in general. It’s definitely a travesty.

    “In
    one e-mail, Kevin Trenberth of the National Center of Atmospheric
    Research admits climatologists “can’t account for the lack
    of warming” in recent years, “and it is a travesty that we
    can’t.””

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • Iran Nuke Document Was Forged – Just Like Iraqi “Yellow Cake” Document

    Washington’s Blog
    Wednesday, Dec 30th, 2009

    Former CIA official Philip Giraldi says that:

    U.S. intelligence has concluded that the document
    published recently by the Times of London, which purportedly describes
    an Iranian plan to do experiments on what the newspaper described as a
    “neutron initiator” for an atomic weapon, is a fabrication.

    Like the Nigerian “yellow cake” forgery, U.S.
    intelligence had to have known the Iranian document was a forgery, and
    yet failed to debunk either. Indeed, as Time points out, the yellow cake document:

    had been checked out — and debunked — by U.S. intelligence a year before the President repeated it.

    Indeed, a claim that Iran is trying to buy uranium is now being made
    against Iran, just as it was with Iraq. Specifically, Associated Press
    – citing unnamed “diplomats” from an unnamed country
    – is reporting today that Iran is trying to obtain uranium. However, Iran says that it has 1,400 uranium mines (a senior IAEA official was allowed to visit one of the mines in 1992) – so why would Iran need to purchase more uranium from another country?

    The parallels go even further, since war against both countries were planned many years ago. Specifically:

    • The decision to launch the Iraq war was made before 9/11
    • The decision to launch a war against Iran was made before 9/11

    And false linkages between terrorists and both countries are be (or may still be) made. Specifically:

    • A knowingly false linkage
      was made between Al Qaeda and Iraq, and – while most people
      forget this fact – that false linkage formed one of the main
      justifications for the war in Iraq
    • U.S. congressman Ron Paul stated
      that the government “is determined to have martial law”,
      and that the government is hoping to get the people “fearful
      enough that they will accept the man on the white horse”. He also
      said “a contrived Gulf of Tonkin-type incident may occur to gain popular support for an attack on Iran”.
    • And former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski told
      the Senate that a terrorist act might be carried out in the U.S. and
      falsely blamed on Iran to justify war against that nation. He also told
      the Senate that the war on terror is “a mythical historical
      narrative”.

    Disclaimer: I don’t like the
    Iranian Mullahs – I think they are fundamentalist fanatics, and
    the violence against protesters is barbaric. I also didn’t like
    Saddam Hussein, as he was a ruthless tyrant.

    But there is a little difference
    between not liking someone and sending American boys and girls overseas
    to be killed in an unnecessary war.

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • After bomb plot, Yemen in U.S. cross hairs

    UPI
    Wednesday, Dec 30th, 2009

    All the signs are that the Obama administration is cranking up its secret war against al-Qaida in Yemen.

    The acknowledgement of increasing intelligence
    cooperation with the beleaguered Sanaa regime, which resulted in a
    string of attacks on the jihadists’ bases in which some 50-60
    operatives were reported killed or captured over the last two weeks, is
    a strong indication that the Americans are showing a new determination
    to eliminate the militants who call themselves al-Qaida in the Arabian
    Peninsula.

    A report carried by The New York Times Monday that the United States
    has opened a “largely covert front” against al-Qaida in
    Yemen underlines how Washington perceives the organization to be a
    serious threat not only to the Sanaa government, battered by a plethora
    of crises, but to the West, and the United States in particular.

    The bizarre — and still largely unexplained — attempt by
    a Nigerian engineering student, son of his country’s leading
    banker, to blow up a Detroit-bound Northwest Airlines flight from
    Amsterdam on Christmas Day has added to U.S. unease about
    al-Qaeda’s swelling resurgence in Yemen, ancestral homeland of
    Osama bin Laden.

    Full article here

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • Report: Iran to launch counterattack if Israel strikes

    Roee Nahmias
    Y Net News
    Tuesday, December 29, 2009

    Lebanon’s al-Nahar reported Tuesday that Iranian Parliament
    Speaker Ali Larijani warned Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak against an
    Israeli attack on his country.

    Larijani told Mubarak that if Israel dared to attack its nuclear
    facilities, Iran would launch a counterattack on Israel and all US
    bases in the country, as well as countries of the Gulf region.

    The two leaders met nine days ago. al-Nahar’s report cites
    “diplomatic sources in Beirut” as saying that Larijani had
    asked Mubarak to convey his message to a number of Gulf States the
    latter was visiting.

    According to the report Mubarak did indeed convey the message to
    leaders of the United Arab Emirates, Saudi Arabia, and Kuwait, who fear
    Iranian aggression within their boundaries.

    Larijani stressed that Iran intended to retaliate only against
    American bases used against it, the report says, and therefore urged
    the states to ask the US not to use bases situated on their territory
    to attack the Islamic Republic.

    Full story here.

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • Ahmadinejad blames US, Israel for Iran protests

    HIEDEH FARMANI
    AFP
    Tuesday, December 29, 2009

    Hardline Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad accused the United
    States and Israel on Tuesday of staging an anti-government protest in
    which at least eight people died, saying it was a “nauseating
    play.”

    His talk of a theatrical piece “commissioned and sold
    out” by the country’s two arch-foes, came as Iran’s
    conservative parliament called for opposition demonstrators to be given
    maximum punishment.

    “Iranians have seen lots of these games,” the president was quoted by state news agency IRNA as saying.

    Americans and Zionists are the sole audience of a play they have commissioned and sold out. A nauseating play is performed.

    Meanwhile, speaker Ali Larijani said on television that
    “parliament wants the judiciary and intelligence bodies to arrest
    those who insult religion and impose the maximum punishment on them
    without reservation.”

    Parliament also condemned “disgusting comments” by
    Western governments about Sunday’s unrest, after they unanimously
    denounced the deadly crackdown in the Islamic republic. ”

    Full story here.

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • Pakistan: Detained Americans had Nuclear Power Site Map

    cryptogon.com
    Tuesday, Dec 29th, 2009

    Were they wearing Dockers?

    Via: Guardian:

    Police are trying to determine whether five Americans detained
    in Pakistan had planned to attack a complex that houses nuclear power
    facilities.

    The young Muslim men, who are from the Washington DC area, were
    arrested in Pakistan earlier this month. Pakistani police and
    government officials have made a series of escalating and, at times,
    seemingly contradictory claims about the men’s intentions. US
    officials have been far more cautious, but they, too, are looking at
    charging the men.

    A Pakistani government official alleged on Saturday that the men had
    established contact with Taliban commanders and had planned to attack
    sites in Pakistan. Earlier, however, local police accused the five of
    intending to fight in Afghanistan after meeting militant leaders.

    The men allegedly had a map of Chashma Barrage, a complex that along
    with nuclear power facilities houses a water reservoir and other
    structures, said Javed Islam, a senior police official in the Sargodha
    area of Punjab province where the men were arrested.

    He stressed that they were not carrying a specific map of a nuclear
    power plant, but a map of the whole Chashma Barrage. The detained men
    had also exchanged emails about the area, Islam claimed. “We are
    also working to retrieve the deleted material in their
    computers,” he said.

    Pakistan has an arsenal of nuclear weapons, but also has nuclear power plants for civilian purposes.

    Any nuclear activity in Pakistan tends to come under US scrutiny
    after the main architect of its atomic weapons programme, Abdul Qadeer
    Khan, was accused of leaking sensitive nuclear secrets. But, as
    militancy has spread in Pakistan, officials have repeatedly insisted
    that the nuclear weapons programme is secure.

    A Pakistani police official, Nazir Ahmad, told the Associated Press
    that the force would ask the courts to charge the five men with
    collecting and attempting to collect material to carry out terrorist
    activities in the country. If convicted, the charges carry a sentence
    of from seven years to life in prison, he said.

    Officials in Pakistan and America say they expect the suspects
    eventually to be deported back to the US, but charging the men in
    Pakistan could delay that process. The country’s legal system can
    be slow and opaque.

    In an interview with the Associated Press on Saturday, Punjab
    province’s law minister, Rana Sanaullah, claimed the men had
    established contact with Taliban commanders. He said they planned to
    meet the Pakistani Taliban chief, Hakimullah Mehsud, and his deputy,
    Qari Hussain, in the tribal region before going on to attack sites
    inside Pakistan. The nuclear power plant “might have been”
    one of the targets, Sanaullah alleged.

    FBI agents have been granted some access to the men, who are being
    held in Lahore, capital of Punjab province, and are looking into what
    potential charges they could face in the US. Possibilities include
    conspiracy to provide material support to a terrorist group.

    The five were arrested in Sargodha earlier this month, but are being held in Lahore, the capital of Punjab province.

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • Segetis Brings in $17.2M for Renewable Chemicals

    Segetis, a startup developing chemicals made from biomass (rather than petroleum), raised $17.2 million this week as part of a planned $22 million Series B financing round, according to a filing with the SEC (hat tip PEHub). Backers include Khosla Ventures, which invested $15 million in Segetis back in 2007, and the Malaysian Life Sciences […]


  • Russia to develop offensive arms to balance out American AMD – Putin

    Russia Today
    Tuesday, Dec 29th, 2009

    Russia will develop its non-nuclear offensive combat systems in
    order to keep balance with American plans for an anti-missile shield.

    The statement was made by Prime Minister Vladimir Putin on a working visit to the country’s Far East.

    “To maintain the power balance while not developing AMD, like the US, we’ll have to develop offensive arms,” – said Putin. “The
    issues of anti-missile defense and offensive combat systems are
    interconnected. Even during the cold war the peace was maintained
    thanks to this balance of power, which includes the correlation of
    forces between AMD, air defense and offensive arms.”

    “If we are not developing AMD, then there’s a threat
    that when our partners create an umbrella over themselves to protect
    them against our offensive system, they might feel completely safe. And
    that might mean that our partners will feel they can do anything they
    want – the level of aggression in politics and economics
    will rise right away. The balance will be lost,”
    he explained.

    At the same time, as part of work on the new START, Russia is ready
    to provide the United States with information on its offensive combat
    systems in exchange for information on their anti-missile plans.

    Putin also noted that the process of negotiations on the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty are going well.

    According to Russian PM the rules of arms reduction should be transparent and clear to both sides.

    Political analyst Vladimir Kozin said that, at the moment, the
    balance between strategic defensive and strategic offensive weapons is
    badly needed.

    ”Russia never deployed ballistic missile defense outside
    its territory unlike the United States, while at the same time the
    United States is fielding an extra ballistic missile defense asset, not
    only in Asia Pacific, but on European soil as well,”
    he said.

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • Russia in secret plan to save Earth from asteroid: official

    AFP
    Wednesday, Dec 30th, 2009

    Russian scientists will soon meet in secret to work on
    a plan for saving Earth from a possible catastrophic collision with a
    giant asteroid in 26 years, the head of Russia’s space agency
    said Wednesday.

    “We will soon hold a closed meeting of our
    collegium, the science-technical council to look at what can be
    done” to prevent the asteroid Apophis from slamming into the
    planet in 2036, Anatoly Perminov told Voice of Russia radio.

    “We are talking about people’s lives,” Perminov was quoted by news agencies as telling the radio station.

    “Better to spend a few hundred million dollars to create a
    system for preventing a collision than to wait until it happens and
    hundreds of thousands of people are killed,” he said.

    Full article here

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • USGS: Arctic sea too warm for sea ice 3 million years ago

    Watts Up With That?
    Wednesday, Dec 30th, 2009

    This is a paleoclimatology finding, with current spin added. I guess they haven’t seen the latest on the NAO and AO.

    USGS: Arctic sea too warm for sea ice 3 million years ago SST 3 million YA – click to enlarge 

    USGS Press Release: Arctic Could Face Warmer and Ice-Free Conditions

    Released: 12/29/2009 6:20:34 AM

    There is increased evidence that the Arctic could face seasonally
    ice-free conditions and much warmer temperatures in the future.

    Scientists documented evidence that the Arctic Ocean and Nordic Seas
    were too warm to support summer sea ice during the mid-Pliocene warm
    period (3.3 to 3 million years ago). This period is characterized by
    warm temperatures similar to those projected for the end of this
    century, and is used as an analog to understand future conditions.

    The U.S. Geological Survey found that summer sea-surface
    temperatures in the Arctic were between 10 to 18°C (50 to 64°F)
    during the mid-Pliocene, while current temperatures are around or below
    0°C (32°F). 

    Examining past climate conditions allows for a true understanding of
    how Earth’s climate system really functions. USGS research on the
    mid-Pliocene is the most comprehensive global reconstruction for any
    warm period. This will help refine climate models, which currently
    underestimate the rate of sea ice loss in the Arctic.

    Loss of sea ice could have varied and extensive consequences, such
    as contributions to continued Arctic warming, accelerated coastal
    erosion due to increased wave activity, impacts to large predators
    (polar bears and seals) that depend on sea ice cover, intensified
    mid-latitude storm tracks and increased winter precipitation in western
    and southern Europe, and less rainfall in the American west.

    “In looking back 3 million years, we see a very different
    pattern of heat distribution than today with much warmer waters in the
    high latitudes,” said USGS scientist Marci Robinson. “The
    lack of summer sea ice during the mid-Pliocene suggests that the
    record-setting melting of Arctic sea ice over the past few years could
    be an early warning of more significant changes to come.”

    Global average surface temperatures during the mid-Pliocene were
    about 3°C (5.5°F) greater than today and within the range
    projected for the 21st century by the Intergovernmental Panel on
    Climate Change.

    Read the full article at http://micropress.org/stratigraphy/.

    [ PDF is here http://micropress.org/stratigraphy/papers/Stratigraphy_6_4_265-275.pdf – Anthony ]

    Scientists studied conditions during the mid-Pliocene by analyzing
    fossils dated back to this time period. The USGS led this research
    through the Pliocene Research, Interpretation and Synoptic Mapping
    group. The primary collaborators in PRISM are Columbia University,
    Brown University, University of Leeds, University of Bristol, the
    British Geological Survey and the British Antarctic Survey. Learn more
    about PRISM research.


    USGS provides science for a changing world. For more information, visit www.usgs.gov.

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • Ritalin Linked With Sudden Death of Children

    E. Huff
    Natural News
    Wednesday, Dec 30th, 2009

    Research from The National Institute of Mental Health
    has revealed that popular Attention Deficit Disorder (ADD) drugs like
    Ritalin are responsible for causing sudden death in many children.
    Study numbers indicate a 500 percent increased risk in childhood death
    from taking such mental health drugs.

    For years, many experts, scientists, and health practitioners have
    speculated that ADD drugs are dangerous and can cause serious injury
    and death. Etta Brown, a licensed educational psychologist and author
    of Learning Disabilities: Understanding the Problem and Managing the
    Challenges explained in response to the study that drugs like Ritalin
    actually destroy the neural function in children’s brains. As a
    result, children who have undergone treatment with Ritalin will
    actually have a much more difficult time processing information and
    learning new things.

    Brown also notes that Ritalin is responsible for causing a permanent
    tic in the face, neck, and head of many of the children who have taken
    or are taking it. Ironically, Ritalin is responsible for causing far
    more serious neurological damage than the problems it is alleged to
    treat. Comprehensive studies over the years have revealed that while
    drugs like Ritalin visibly calm children, these drugs destroy their
    delicate, developing nervous systems and can permanently cripple their
    ability to function as normal human beings.

    Ritalin remains one of the primary drugs prescribed for children
    with supposed behavioral problems. Rather than be encouraged to modify
    diet and increase exercise, children are being given drugs by their
    doctors instead. Increases in behavioral and learning problems among
    children have been increasing right alongside escalating levels of
    environmental toxins. Children are also spending more time at home
    alone while their parents work, eating greater amounts of junk food,
    and not getting adequate sleep.

    Etta Brown, and others, suggest better nutrition, adequate sleep,
    and increased exercise and physical activity as a proper treatment for
    children with behavioral and learning disabilities. Nutrition alone is
    of vital importance since inadequate nutrient intake is arguably the
    most significant factor in children’s inability to behave and
    learn. Proper brain function cannot be achieved if the brain is not
    being fed what it needs to process information and grow.

    Parental guidance in regulating and maintaining a proper lifestyle
    for their children is also vital if true improvement is ever to be
    achieved. Medical professionals, child psychologists, and others will
    have to come to grips with the fact that drugs are not the answer to
    childhood developmental problems.

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • CRU’s forecast: UK winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”

    Watts Up With That?
    Tuesday, Dec 29th, 2009

    Richard North from the EU Referendum writes of a curious juxtaposition of forecasts, then and now. I thought it worth sharing here since it highlights the chutzpah
    with which CRU botched their forecast in March of 2000. At least they
    didn’t claim that UK snowfall was in a “death spiral”.

    From The Independent
    on 20 March 2000 we got the headline: “Snowfalls are now just a
    thing of the past”. According to Dr David Viner, a senior
    research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the
    University of East Anglia, within a few years winter snowfall will
    become “a very rare and exciting event”.

    CRU’s forecast: UK winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”

    Then, from the Telegraph online today we get: “Snow and ice to hit Britain at New Year.”

    CRU’s forecast: UK winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”

    The mercury is set to drop to 28°F (-3°C) in
    most of England and Wales on Thursday night, New Year’s Eve, and
    17°F (-8°C) in Scotland, with widespread snow showers also
    predicted. New Year’s Day will also be chilly, with the northern
    half of Britain’s struggling to get above freezing during the
    day, while London will do well to reach 39°F (4°C)

    The forecast follows a spell of snow, sleet and ice which has
    gripped Britain for more than a week but relented in most parts over
    recent days.

    It is so good to see in The Independent that the CRU is living up to its justly acquired reputation for accuracy.

    I’ll also point out that this “very rare and exciting event” happened in London last year also.

    Snow blankets London for Global Warming debate – first October Snow in over 70 years

    CRU’s forecast: UK winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event” GD9378751@LONDON   OCTOBER 28   1609

    Above: London 10/29/2008

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • Most Carry-Ons Banned On Flights From Canada To U.S.

    Breitbart.tv
    Wednesday, Dec 30th, 2009

    Transport Canada: On December 28, Transport Canada put
    in place enhanced security measures for passengers on flights bound for
    the United States.

    Effective immediately, US bound passengers are not
    allowed to bring carry on bags into the cabin of the aircraft, with
    some exceptions.

    Passengers may carry with them the following items:
    medication or medical devices, small purses, cameras, coats, items for
    care of infants, laptop computers, crutches, canes, walkers, containers
    carrying life sustaining items, a special needs item, musical
    instruments, or diplomatic or consular bags.

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • Triffids are recruited in the global warming debate

    Janet Daley
    London Telegraph
    Wednesday, Dec 30th, 2009

    We should have known that the BBC would make some
    didactic use of its revival of the great horror story,
    “Day of the Triffids”. But the public indoctrination
    message seems to have got a bit confused.

    About half way through the first part (shown on BBC1 at primetime on
    Monday night) we learned that the monstrous, flesh-eating giant
    plants had, in this incarnation, been deliberately farmed for
    their oil – a safe alternative fuel which, as the hero explained
    while trying to extricate one his limbs from the grasp
    of a rampaging triffid, had “saved us from global
    warming”.

    I don’t know how this struck you but in my household it
    produced an explosion of hilarity and a chorus of, “Should have
    taken your chances with the 2 degree temperature rise, mate.”

    As I say, I am not at all sure what the real warning of this
    salutary tale was intended to be: in the final part, the man
    responsible for the Triffid Solution to Climate Change admits that the
    hell he has unleashed on the world might not have been such a
    great idea. With quite breathtaking understatement, he says,
     “There are always unintended consequences to everything we
    do.” I’ll say: in this case, the near-extinction of the
    human population.

    So was this designed to be yet another lesson in climate change
    awareness: don’t let things go so far that you have to turn to an
    army of man-eating herbs to save you? Or was it a warning against
    taking drastic measures against global warming which may have
    unpredictable risks?

    Full article here

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • 24 Wacky Questions From Real Job Interviews

    How would you move Mount Fuji? Today, Glassdoor.com, which collects anonymous employee comments on companies, is citing that goofy question and more in its collection of 24 oddball queries that were actually asked in interviews.  Some of them are doozies.

    So which tech companies are considered lousy to interview at? In addition to its collection of wacky job interview questions, Glassdoor has gathered data from its site visitors on the tech companies that provide the most positive interview experiences, and the ones guaranteed to make you squirm.

    Nokia gets the highest ratings for positive experiences:

    And Reynolds and Reynolds’ job interviews are rated the most negative (among Silicon Valley giants, Oracle and Google don’t fare too well, either):

    Finally, get a load of these actual questions asked during job interviews. Would you be able to handle these?:

    1. What was your best MacGyver moment? – Schlumberger junior field engineer

    2. How many tennis balls are in this room and why? – Yahoo customer service rep

    3. If you were a brick in a wall which brick would you be and why? – Nestle USA procurement intern

    4. How would you move Mount Fuji? – Microsoft software development engineer

    5. If two cars are traveling in a two lap race on a track of any length, one going 60 mph and the other going 30 mph, how fast will the slower car have to go to finish at the same time as the faster car? – Morgan Stanley trader

    6. Are your parents disappointed with your career aspirations? – Fisher Investments client service associate

    7. Tell me how you would determine how many house painters there are in the United States? – Acquity Group business analyst

    8. What should it cost to rent Central Park for commercial purposes? – Bain & Co. business analyst

    9. If I put you in a sealed room with a phone that had no dial tone, how would you fix it? – Apple software engineer

    10. If you could be any animal, what would you be and why? – Pacific Sunwear sales associate

    11. How many hair salons are there in Japan? – Boston Consulting associate

    12. If both a taxi and a limo were priced the exact same, which one would you choose? – Best Buy customer service

    13. How to measure 9 minutes using only a 4 minute and 7 minute hourglass? – Bank of America quantitative developer

    14. What are five uncommon uses of a brick, not including building, layering, or a paper-weight? – Kaplan Higher Education data analyst

    15. What is the probability of throwing 11 and over with two dices – American Airlines financial analyst

    16. Say you are dead — what do you think your eulogy would say about you? – Nationwide product manager

    17. Given a dictionary of words, how do you calculate the anagrams for a new word? – Amazon software development engineer

    18. How many lightbulbs are in this building? – Monitor Group entry interview

    19. Given a square grid of numbers, considering all the numbers at the boundary as one layer and numbers just inside as another layer and so on how would you rotate each of the layers of the numbers by a given amount? – Microsoft engineer

    20. How would you sell me eggnog in Florida in the summer? – Expedia market manager

    21. Develop an algorithm for finding the shortest distance between two words in a document.  After the phone interview is over, take a few hours to develop a working example in C++ and send it to the manager. – Google software engineer

    22. Given a fleet of 50 trucks, each with a full fuel tank and a range of 100 miles, how far can you deliver a payload?  You can transfer the payload from truck to truck, and you can transfer fuel from truck to truck.  Extend your answer for n trucks. – Palantir Technologies business development engineer

    23. You are in a room with three switches which correspond to three bulbs in another room and you don’t know which switch corresponds to which bulb. You can only enter the room with the bulbs once. You can NOT use any external equipment (power supplies, resistors, etc.). How do you find out which bulb corresponds to which switch? – Goldman Sachs X-Div/back office

    24. If you saw someone steal a quarter, would you report it? – Amazon shipping manifest clerk

    Image courtesy of Zach Klein on Flickr.


  • Facebook hires team to lobby governments on privacy issues

    London Telegraph
    Tuesday, Dec 29th, 2009

    Facebook has hired a team of lobbyists to try to sway governments on its privacy regulations, it has emerged.

    In 2009 the social networking site saw incredible
    growth, going from 50 million users worldwide in January to more than
    350 million in less than 12 months.

    However, Facebook’s founder, Mark Zuckerberg, 25, has realised
    that the biggest difficulty is how to manage the privacy of users while
    growing so fast.

    With so much personal information kept on its servers, it is coming
    under increasing scrutiny from governments and campaign groups.

    Full article here

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • Pharmaceuticals are more dangerous to your health than terrorists’ exploding underwear

    Mike Adams
    Natural News
    Tuesday, Dec 29th, 2009

    As all of North America now seems to be focused on the issue of one
    terrorist wearing a pair of exploding underwear, I might as well
    comment on this latest bit of security theater that seems to have
    transfixed the nation. Pictures of the exploding underwear
    “bomb” have now surfaced on the ‘net. You can view
    them at ABC News: http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/north…

    Here is exactly what the text on this page says (I’m not
    making this up, this is seriously true): (warning: Some of the content
    here is graphic, read at your own risk…)

    “The first photo, to the left, shows the slightly charred
    and singed underpants with the bomb packet still in place.”

    I don’t know what you think, but if you did an underwear
    search of all the passengers flying these days, you’d probably
    find half of them are wearing underwear that’s slightly charred and singed with the “bomb packet” still in place.

    The gastrointestinal health of the general population is atrocious! And by the time you add in some airport food and in-flight processed food
    snacks, pretty much everyone on the airplane is setting off a little
    bomb packet by the time they get off the plane. (Why do you think
    everybody can’t wait to get off in such a hurry?)

    Processed food has turned us all into in-flight terrorists!

    Frankly, I’m not sure what’s more of a threat to public health: Lousy airport security or the digestive effects of in-flight meals. But they both have one thing in common: Underwear…

    How to explode your rectum without harming anyone nearby

    The ABC News story mentioned above goes on to state that this
    terrorist’s underwear was packing 80 grams of an explosive powder
    called PETN, which government tests have revealed can blow a (tiny)
    hole in the wall of an airplane.

    This is all brilliant stuff, of course. Truly brilliant. This whole
    idea that underwear explosives might destroy an airplane all makes
    sense except for the fact that the terrorist’s butt cheeks are in the way!

    Had this explosive packet actually been set off, I can tell you
    exactly what would have happened: There would have been a really loud
    pop, immediately followed by in-flight pieces of exploding butt cheeks.

    I’m not trying to be funny here. This is a true description of the way bombs work. They explode outward,
    destroying whatever is closest to them first. And this guy actually had
    this bomb wedged in between his butt cheeks. A sort of “wedgie
    bomb”, if you will. A wedgie with a bang.

    This is a serious discussion. There was an attempted assassination
    of a Middle Eastern prince that happened not long ago. It was even
    reported in the press. The assassin had somehow managed to shove
    explosives into his rectum — I swear I’m not making this up
    — and waltzed right through security with it. He then shuffled
    toward his target, fired off the bomb and subsequently blew his butt
    cheeks all over the room… without harming anyone else.

    Brilliant, huh?

    Think about it. In World War II films, you know how
    you always see brave soldiers throwing themselves on an enemy grenade
    to protect their squad buddies? That actually works because whoever is on top of the grenade absorbs the explosion. It’s basic physics.

    In the case of super wedgie terrorist, he’s sitting right on top of the explosive powder! Who do you think is going to absorb the full force of the explosion? It’s going to be the guy sitting on it.

    This is physics 101. A small bomb in somebody’s underwear is really only a threat to the idiot wearing the underwear.

    The first rule of making bombs is that you probably should not be sitting on top of them when they go off.

    Please remove your shoes and your underwear…

    Predictably, U.S. authorities have now talked this up into a huge
    security threat. And sooner or later, it’s all bound to lead up
    to mandatory underwear searches!

    I can see it now: A row of air passengers stands nervously at the gate, nearly ready to board the plane when TSA
    enforcers approach and suddenly demand that everybody bend over and
    pull down their underwear for a quick search for
    “explosives.”

    Sadly, most Americans are so brain-numbed by security propaganda, they would probably go along with it!

    So why not just go all the way with this and pass a new TSA rule requiring all Americans to fly with no underwear!

    The captain comes on the intercom, saying, “Visibility is 80
    miles, we’re climbing to 29,000 feet, and we’re expecting
    this flight to be a little breezy…”

    Yep, it’s undies off when boarding planes from now on. As you pass through security, you can toss your water
    bottles in one bin, your underwear and panties in another bin, and your
    self respect in a third. Essentially, if these security searches get
    any more personal, they’re going to undress us from head to toe
    and make us wear medical gowns, chained to our seats
    like convicts in a prisoner transport plane. Once we land, we can
    reclaim our underwear and, if we’re lucky, a bit of our lost
    pride.

    Your bra just might contain a bomb…

    Don’t you just love how air travel
    authorities keep coming up with new stuff that you have to throw away
    because it might be a bomb? Remember when we could bring actual water
    on airplanes? Those were the good old days.

    Then one day they declare “Your water might be a bomb!”
    So millions of passengers now ditch their water at the security gate,
    throwing it all to waste.

    Then they came up with the idea that terrorists could “mix
    binary liquids” to make liquid bombs in the airplane toilet, and
    they used that to ban all liquids. So much for your toothpaste, contact
    lens solution, herbal tinctures and superfood beverage. Toss it in the
    trash if you want to get on this plane, buddy!

    Now they’re going after your underwear. And
    it won’t be long before you have to strip down to your birthday
    suit and hand over your undies for an “inspection” —
    right before they send you through the low-frequency X-ray machine that
    scans your body parts and displays them on a screen as if you were butt
    naked.

    Just wait for a female terrorist who hides some explosives in her
    bra one day. Following that, a new TSA security rule will be initiated
    and all flights will become bra-less. No underwear, no bras, no water… what the heck is happening here? Are airlines
    going to shave our heads and tattoo barcodes on our arms, too, just in
    case they lose track of which person was handcuffed to which seat?

    Absurd security

    This is all getting beyond the point of absurdity. If a terrorist
    wants to pack a little explosive powder and stuff it down their pants,
    or up their rectum, or have it surgically sewn into their abdomen, there’s nothing we can do to stop that short of strip-searching every single passenger.

    And that’s not security: That’s just a demeaning police state that treats its own people like criminals. If we all have to fly without underwear and bras, the terrorists win!

    Besides, all this ridiculous security isn’t about saving lives.
    If U.S. authorities wanted to save lives, they would ban aspartame, or
    outlaw chemotherapy, or arrest the crooks at the drug companies who are
    killing over a hundred thousand people every single year — a far
    greater number than those killed by in-flight acts of terror (even
    including 2001 and 9/11).

    Even if there were no airport security at all, the risk of being killed by an in-flight act of terror would be a fraction of the risk of being killed by pharmaceuticals
    in any given year. So why are U.S. authorities going crazy about
    airport security when so many Americans are dying from pharmaceutical
    toxicity every single day? Statistically speaking, the number of people
    killed by dangerous prescription medications is equivalent to one jumbo
    air liner falling out of the sky and crashing to the ground every single day.

    Yet that threat to health and safety goes entirely unmentioned. Un-investigated. Un-noticed.

    So while over 100,000 Americans are dying each year from dangerous
    medications, the mainstream media has us all fixated on a pair of exploding underwear? Are you kidding me?

    The whole thing has become a complete circus. Real threats to your
    safety are ignored while miniscule threats are hyped up as if they were
    life-and-death to everyone.

    And yet, amazingly, most air travelers still go along with it!

    This just goes to show you how easily the population can be
    controlled by fear. I never thought that a photo of a pair of singed
    underwear would scare a hundred million adults into giving up their
    freedoms, but this is what has apparently taken place.

    How about zero-security flights?

    Here’s an idea: Airlines should offer optional zero-security flights.
    On those flights, there are no security checks. Anyone with a valid
    concealed-carry permit could bring any weapons they want, and the pilot
    and co-pilot can be armed, too. You can pass right through security
    with no X-rays, no checks, no delays. You simply sign a disclaimer and
    go right from the check-in counter to your boarding gate with zero
    hassles.

    I would gladly fly on these zero-security flights.
    You know why? Because 99.99% of the people flying on those planes would
    be cops packing heat, ex-military people packing heat and
    concealed-carry citizens packing heat. Any terrorist stupid enough to
    try something on such a flight would find himself facing a
    citizen’s army of vigilant passengers.

    Zero-security flights would be the safest airplanes in the sky,
    because no terrorist, hijacker or violent criminal would dare board one.

    Plus, we all get to keep our underwear on

    Book Mark it-> del.icio.us | Reddit | Slashdot | Digg | Facebook | Technorati | Google | StumbleUpon | Window Live | Tailrank | Furl | Netscape | Yahoo | BlinkList

  • Video: 2011 Volvo S60 is one shapely Swede

    Filed under: , , ,

    2011 Volvo S60 – Click above for image gallery

    The debut of the 2011 Volvo S60 is still a few months away, but the safety-oriented Swedes have released a teaser video on Facebook of the new S60 and it’s shapely duds, finally giving us a complete view of Volvo’s bread-and-butter sedan.

    Inspired by the S60 Concept shown at the Detroit Auto Show earlier this year, many of the elements that debuted on the design study have made a successful transition to the sedan, including the coupe-like roof, sculpted swage line and organic, angular front fascia. We’re particularly smitten by the taillamps, which evolve the familiar Volvo shape and incorporate a set of lighted tubes that compliment the heavily revised rump and its quaint spoiler.

    Unfortunately, Volvo omitted any interior shots, so we’ll just have to wait for the S60’s debut in Geneva for a glimpse inside. In the meantime, make the jump for the video and check out the gallery of screen caps below for a series of stills.

    [Source: Facebook via Kilometer Magazine]

    Continue reading Video: 2011 Volvo S60 is one shapely Swede

    Video: 2011 Volvo S60 is one shapely Swede originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:58:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments

  • Review: 2010 Audi R8 5.2 FSI V10 reminds us we’re in the wrong tax bracket

    Filed under: , , ,

    2010 Audi R8 5.2 FSI V10 – Click above for high-res image gallery

    Sigh. Another day, another 500+ horsepower supercar to babysit for a week. Such is my lot in life. Obviously I’m joking, to a degree. To be honest, I wasn’t that particularly jazzed about the Audi R8 with the defanged Lambo LP560-4 V10 shoehorned behind the seats, especially as I had prior knowledge that the more proper six-speed manual R8 5.2 FS I was supposed to get had been unceremoniously replaced by the slusher, R-Tronic version. Before continuing one sentence further, am I aware that I sound like the world’s most spoiled rotten brat? Oh yes.

    But see, the thing is, I’ve driven the regular-strength V8 R8 and you know what? There’s nothing wrong with it. Perfectly neutral handling, 420 eager horses and looks that kill, or at least attract eyeballs like nothing I’ve seen this side of pornography. While more horsepower is always welcome, the notion that the 5.2-liter V10 “only” makes 105 ponies more combined with the extra weight just didn’t set off any great alarm bells of excitement. I’ll put it to you like this: I was much more excited when the 2010 Nissan GT-R showed up at my door.

    It’s now seven days, four tanks of gasoline and 870 miles later. I drove the wheels off the world’s most expensive Audi, thrice. On every type of road, over every type of surface, never venturing more than a few miles from home. I mention that last bit because discounting long trips, I’ve never put so many miles on a press car. Has my tune changed? Is the ten-cylinder R8 worth the $25,000 price premium over it’s “lesser” sibling? Perhaps most importantly, is the Audi R8 5.2 FSI an actual, honest-to-goodness everyday supercar? Jump and find out. And if you don’t feel like jumping, please for the good of your eyes, take a few minutes to peruse the gallery, as it is one of our finest ever.

    Photos by Drew Phillips / Copyright (C)2009 Weblogs, Inc.

    Continue reading Review: 2010 Audi R8 5.2 FSI V10 reminds us we’re in the wrong tax bracket

    Review: 2010 Audi R8 5.2 FSI V10 reminds us we’re in the wrong tax bracket originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 30 Dec 2009 11:58:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments


    Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]

    Read Original Article