Author: Serkadis

  • Chrysler celebrates current Viper with Dodge Viper SRT10 Final Edition

    Chrysler will celebrate the final year of production of the current-generation Dodge Viper with a limited production run of 50 units of the 2010 SRT10 “Final Edition.” The 2010 Dodge SRT10 Final Edition Viper is available in coupe, roadster and ACR (American Club Racer) model configurations.

    The Final Edition Viper exterior features a Graphite Clear Coat body with a painted black center stripe traced in red. Viper Coupe and ACR Final Edition models include a black windshield surround. All Final Edition models carry unique side sill badges. On the inside, the Final Edition model gets custom red accent stitching, red painted halo surrounds on the gauge cluster and bright stainless steel screws in center stack bezel. A numbered dash plaque (1-50) is also located on the shifter bezel. All Dodge Viper Final Edition Coupe and Roadster models will ride on 6-spoke wheels painted in Anthracite, while ACR models will come with 5-spoke Sidewinder wheels in black.

    Power still comes from the 8.4L V10 making 600-hp and 560 lb-ft of torque. That’s good for a 0-60 mph run in less than 4 seconds with a top speed of 202 mph.

    Production of the 2010 Dodge Viper Final Edition models will begin in early summer.

    2010 Dodge Viper SRT10 Final Edition:

    – By: Kap Shah


  • One Small Policy Step, but One Huge Leap for Government Openness: Statement of Gary D. Bass

    <!–break–>

    PRESS STATEMENT
    -For Immediate Release-
    April 7, 2010

    Contact: Brian Gumm, (202) 683-4812, [email protected]

    One Small Policy Step, but One Huge Leap for Government Openness

    Statement of Gary D. Bass
    Executive Director, OMB Watch
    On Release of Open Government Plans and other Transparency Actions

    WASHINGTON, April 7, 2010—The Obama administration took several actions today that will likely have a lasting and positive impact on government transparency. Each federal agency announced its Open Government Plan, complemented by Office of Management and Budget (OMB) policy changes to reduce certain impediments to transparency and to improve both regulatory and federal spending transparency.

    These actions were required under the Obama administration’s Open Government Directive, which was issued on Dec. 8, 2009. At their best, the Directive and the actions taken today represent a process that could become as important to government transparency as enactment of the Freedom of Information Act. Even at their worst, today’s actions represent solid progress toward meaningful government transparency, with many details still needed.

    Agency Open Government Plans
    Some agency Plans appear impressive for their ambitious goals, the scope of issues tackled, and obvious commitment to transparency. For example, the Department of Health and Human Services offers five “flagship” initiatives and promises to make available by year’s end a dozen high-value datasets that have never been public before. Other agency Plans appear less impressive, with fewer concrete deliverables and less grand vision. Moreover, a number of the agencies say they will be providing certain types of information in the future, which skeptics can easily criticize as “planning to plan.”

    The inconsistency in agency Plans, despite being almost expected due to resource differences and agencies’ varied experience with openness, can be maddening to those of us in the open government community. Advocates want more than statements and rhetoric; they want actual data that is timely, high-quality, searchable, and meaningful to all Americans.

    To objectively assess the agency Open Government Plans, advocates such as OMB Watch will work collaboratively through the OpenTheGovernment.org coalition to report on the good and the bad in these Plans.

    Federal Spending Transparency
    The OMB announcements on spending transparency and policy changes to reduce barriers to transparency are not monumental. The steps to begin disclosing on USAspending.gov information about sub-recipients of federal grants and contracts by Oct. 1 is already mandated by law. Additionally, under the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act, the administration already proved it could successfully collect sub-recipient information. However, OMB also announced it will develop a long-range plan on federal spending transparency. We applaud this first step and look forward to assessing the completed plan when it becomes available.

    Reducing Impediments to Meaningful Transparency
    Likewise, the policy changes to reduce impediments to meaningful transparency are modest. OMB issued three documents dealing with implementation of the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA) and federal regulations. The first is a primer to help agencies with implementation of the PRA; the second clarifies that certain uses of social media and web-based tools by agencies are excluded from OMB PRA reviews. A third memo encourages agencies to use a Regulation Identifier Number (RIN) throughout the regulatory process to give the public a common identifier to track regulations. All of these documents are useful, with the clarification on social media tools being the highest priority. At the same time, there are many other policy impediments that OMB must address, many of which were noted in recommendations provided by a diverse group of 350 individuals and groups in November 2008.

    The Big Picture
    Collectively, today’s actions signal something quite profound: the sum is much greater than the parts. Never before has there been an administration as vocal about openness and transparency as the Obama administration. Never before have agencies been tasked with creating Open Government Plans. Never before has an administration committed to a comprehensive plan for federal spending transparency. Never before has there been a White House team of top-level staff with transparency issues as part of their work portfolio.

    The White House has brought such an infectious enthusiasm and energy to the Open Government Directive that it appears transparency is going viral inside government. As one federal employee noted, transparency is now being raised in meetings that have nothing to do with the Open Government Directive. To the extent this behavior continues, it has the potential to be a truly transformational culture change.

    President Obama is putting in place the policies and technologies that are needed to strengthen transparency. No doubt they will need to be tweaked and expanded. But from a broader perspective, the actions today represent the beginnings of a meaningful shift from a government perceived as secretive to one that makes openness an essential element of its operations.

    For all of the above reasons, OMB Watch concludes that the Open Government Directive and today’s actions are only one small policy step, but one huge leap for government openness.

    # # #

    OMB Watch is a nonprofit government watchdog organization dedicated to promoting government accountability, citizen participation in public policy decisions, and the use of fiscal and regulatory policy to serve the public interest.

    To access the transparency recommendations referenced in this statement, visit http://www.ombwatch.org/renewinggovernment. For updates and additional analysis, visit our blog, The Fine Print, at http://www.ombwatch.org/the_fine_print.

  • Ben Bernanke: We’re Screwed Unless We Can Find A Solution To The Fact That People Are Getting Older Every Year

    Alan Greenspan Ben Bernanke is delivering a speech in Dallas right now, creatively titled: Economic Challenges: Past, Present, and Future.

    Obviously it’s the future we’re most concerned with, so we jumped down to that part, which was in fact interesting:

    What about the longer term? The economist John Maynard Keynes said that in the long run, we are all dead.5 If he were around today he might say that, in the long run, we are all on Social Security and Medicare. That brings me to two interrelated economic challenges our nation faces: meeting the economic needs of an aging population and regaining fiscal sustainability. The U.S. population will change significantly in coming decades with the combined effect of the decline in fertility rates following the baby boom and increasing longevity. As our population ages, the ratio of working-age Americans to older Americans will fall, which could hold back the long-run prospects for living standards in our country. The aging of the population also will have a major impact on the federal budget, most dramatically on the Social Security and Medicare programs, particularly if the cost of health care continues to rise at its historical rate. Thus, we must begin now to prepare for this coming demographic transition.

    His concern is in the right place… but is there actually a solution to an aging population? Demographics, it would seem, is destiny.

    And thus we go back to this chart we published yesterday on the civilian employment ratio. Even if the economy recovers and headline unemployment goes up, Bernanke is telling us that the number of civilians actually working (as a percentage of the total population) will go down.

    chart

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • Uncharted 2 didn’t redefine action games because it wasn’t multiplatform, says Castlevania: LoS …

    Castlevania: Lords of Shadow producer Dave Cox doesn’t think Naughty Dog’s PS3 exclusive Uncharted 2 redefined action games. His reason? Because it wasn’t multiplatform.

  • Sarkozy Kicks Off Criminal Investigation Into Blog/Twitter Reports He Had An Affair

    And we were always told in the US that we spent too much time worrying about which politician was having affairs, while in France, it was pretty much expected that politicians had mistresses. Yet, apparently, Nicolas Sarkozy is so upset about online rumors, repeated on blogs and on Twitter, that both he and his wife have had affairs, that a criminal investigation has been kicked off. Under what law? Apparently the claim is that this would be a “fraudulent introduction of data into a computer system.” That seems like a stretch. These are just internet rumors. Most people let them go. At the very least, I could see a libel claim — but a criminal investigation for “fraudulent introduction of data into a computer system” just seems like massive abuse of power and overkill.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story





  • Sibling Rivalry: What’s the better value play, Ford Fiesta or Mazda2?

    Filed under: , , , ,

    2011 Ford Fiesta and Mazda2 – click either image for high-res gallery

    The 2011 Ford Fiesta and Mazda2 come to market this summer with attractive looks and plenty of available features. The two models also have a lot in common, as both vehicles are based off the same B-Segment platform and engage in a good bit of parts-sharing. But which vehicle is the better value?

    The folks over at TrueDelta attempted to solve that equation, and according to the research firm’s blog, the answer isn’t as simple as “which vehicle is cheaper.” Sticker price is, however, a good place to start. A base Fiesta hatch stickers at $15,795, while the Mazda2 totals $14,730 (both prices include destination charge). That’s a $1,065 win for Mazda, no doubt, but TrueDelta claims that figuring in the value of standard equipment in the Fiesta that doesn’t exist in the Mazda brings the price gap down to about $300. A loaded Mazda2 Touring is $1,880 cheaper than a loaded Fiesta, but again, with equipment differences figured in the chasm, the gap reportedly shrinks to a mere $200.

    After figuring in all the variables, TrueDelta feels the Fiesta wins out in spite of the fact that the Mazda2 is still cheaper – even when factoring in available equipment. Why? The answer is fuel economy. The most efficient Mazda2 promises 28 miles per gallon in the city and 34 mpg on the highway. The thriftiest Fiesta comes in at a far more impressive 30/40 city/highway mix; more than enough fuel savings to offset a few hundred bucks.

    But that doesn’t make the Fiesta a superior deal in our estimation; at least not yet. If the Mazda2’s engineers deliver plenty of added “Zoom-Zoom,” we may be able to forgive and forget about the Fiesta’s on-paper fuel economy advantage.

    Gallery: 2011 Mazda2

    Gallery: 2011 Ford Fiesta

    [Source: TrueDelta]

    Sibling Rivalry: What’s the better value play, Ford Fiesta or Mazda2? originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 07 Apr 2010 13:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Read | Permalink | Email this | Comments

  • Hideo Kojima sees the future of gaming without platform borders

    Originally, Hideo Kojima wanted Metal Gear Solid: Peace Walker to be rated E for Everyone. That way, everyone would be able to enjoy his games. Unfortunately for that dream, Peace Walker is a Teen game, so it

  • ASLA Communications and Advocacy Internship, Summer 2010


    The American Society of Landscape Architects (ASLA) is seeking applicants for its 2010 summer semester (May – August) internship program. This year, ASLA seeks two full-time interns.

    A summer internship with ASLA provides an excellent opportunity for graduate or undergraduate students studying landscape architecture, architecture, urban planning, sustainable development, or environmental studies. Students with an interest in policy, advocacy, and web communications are encouraged to apply.

    Responsibilities:

    • Research, track, and analyze federal and state legislation focused on transportation, natural resources, environmental, water resource management, and sustainability issues, particularly as they relate to landscape architecture.
    • Assist with the Society’s direct advocacy with the Congress, the administration, and the federal agencies.
    • Assist with drafting, editing, and compiling government affairs communications, correspondence, and publications.
    • Develop original content for The Dirt.
    • Contribute to biweekly electronic newsletter, LAND Online
    • Support chapter communications and resource development.

    Requirements:

    • Current enrollment in a Master’s degree or Bachelor’s degree program in landscape architecture, architecture, urban planning, public policy or administration, environmental studies, or related field.
    • Passionate interest in policy issues related to design, land use, sustainability, and the environment.
    • Experience or familiarity with federal and state government affairs and the federal appropriations process.
    • Ability to write congressional correspondence, news stories, reports, and presentations.
    • Working knowledge of Microsoft Office (Word, Outlook, Powerpoint, Excel) and proven Internet research skills.

    The 2009 summer internship is unpaid but can be used to fulfill internship requirements or complete course credits. The summer intern should be present at ASLA offices for at least three full days per week. ASLA offers a flexible schedule. Please send cover letter and résumé to [email protected].

  • GM lost $4.3 billion in the 6 months after bankruptcy protection

    During a conference call earlier today, General Motors’ CFO, Christopher P. Liddell, said that the company lost $4.3 billion in the 6 months after coming out of from bankruptcy protection. Liddell said that the company had a positive cash flow of $1 billion during the period.

    Liddell said he expects GM to hit profit in 2010 and that it made progress towards that goal in the first quarter.

    “We don’t need to make that much improvement to get to profitability,” Liddell said “It’s getting close to break-even if you get rid of those one-off items that happened in the fourth quarter.”

    The report, which covers the period from July 10 to Dec. 31, listed $36.2 billion in cash reserves and marketable securities.

    GM reiterated its commitment to pay off its debt to the United States and Canadian governments by June. So far, GM has made payments totaling $2.8 billion towards an initial balance of $8.3 billion. Most of GM’s original loan of $50 billion was converted to a 61 percent equity stake held by the U.S. Treasury.

    – By: Stephen Calogera

    Source: NYTimes


  • EU PSN Video Store update 04/07

    Midweek can be such a drag, especially if you’ve got plans for the weekend. Well, apart from games, one other thing that makes time fly is a good round of movies. For the European Video Store, here’s

  • Someone at Boeing wants Alan Mulally to come back

    A website called bringbackalan.com is calling for the return of FoMoCo’s CEO to Boeing Co., where Alan Mulally spend 37 years, or his entire career, before moving to Ford in 2006.

    Mulally was CEO of Boeing Commercial Airplanes before FoMoCo Chairman Bill Ford lured him to come to Dearborn.

    The Web site reads: “Now that he’s fixed Ford, let’s get Alan Mulally back to Boeing where he’s REALLY needed!!!”

    No one knows who is responsible for the site but it suggests that Mulally is the man to get the Boeing 787 Dreamliner aircraft, which has been delayed 5 times, off the ground.

    – By: Stephen Calogera

    Source: Automotive News (Subscription Required)


  • GM announces expansion of brake override software globally by 2012

    General Motors said it will expand use of “enhanced smart pedal,” otherwise known as brake override, globally to all passenger cars with automatic transmissions and electronic throttle control. The change involves modifying existing electronic controls to reduce power to the engine in cases where the brake and accelerator pedal are being depressed at the same time.

    GM says that the global rollout will be completed by the end of 2012.

    “News media analyses of government data consistently validates that GM’s safety record on this issue is among the strongest in the industry,” said Tom Stephens, vice chairman, GM Global Product Operations. “At the same time, we know safety is top of mind for consumers, so we are applying additional technology to reassure them that they can count on the brakes in their GM vehicle.”

    – By: Kap Shah


  • The Treasury Gets A Great Auction And Yields Pull Back, But All This Means Is That Investors Are Fearful Again

    chart

    The folks are jumping up and down on CNBC about how the Treasury just pulled off an “A” auction.

    Bob Pisani called it “impressive.”

    Yields slipped and are well off 4% now, which is where they hit earlier this week. (The full results can be found here [.pdf])

    But before you bust out the champagne, just consider that Greece is in trouble, the Euro is down, and the stock market trouble.

    The easiest way to interpret this news is that this is flight-to-safety, and not much else. Sure it’s great news for TIm Geithner and Uncle Sam, but hardly a cause for celebration.

    Remember, the “V” in treasury yields is the most promising “V” there is.

    Here’s our Vincent Fernando from two days ago:

    Government bond yields can go up for many reasons, both good and bad. Investors might think U.S. creditworthiness is deteriorating due to large amounts of debt, or they could believe that inflation is likely to pick up and thus need to be compensated.

    At the same time, investors may demand higher yields from government debt if they expect higher interest rates from the Fed in the future, created by the Fed in response to a strengthening economy. They can also simply find other forms of investment more attractive, due to higher expected returns in alternatives like stocks. Thus we know U.S. government bond yields are rising, but the question is why.

    Are rising bond yields are positive or negative sign? Should we be worried that bond markets are ready to take America to task for its debt? Or should we be happy to see bond markets signaling a rebounding economy?

    Well today says it’s the latter, positive take on the bond market. Last Friday we had good news on the jobs front, we’ve recently had good news on the U.S. manufacturing front, and today we got good news on the U.S. services front. Bond yields have continued to surge. The yield curve has also steepened whereby the gap between short and long-term U.S. government debt has expanded.

    Bond investors aren’t demanding higher yields because they fear inflation. You can easily check the bond market’s inflation expectations by examining the difference between inflation-linked and plain vanilla U.S. bonds. These inflation expectations remain muted, despite the recent government bond yield surge, at just 2.4% priced-in and expected U.S. inflation per year out to 2028 according to The Economist.

    Bond traders don’t fear America’s creditworthiness either. Yields are rising on signs U.S. economic strength, such as is happening today. A stronger economy makes a country more creditworthy, thus you would expect bonds to rally (and their yield to fall) when good news comes out, if they are trading based on national creditworthiness.

    Rather, bond yields are rising because decent U.S. economic growth has now become far more likely. As Scott Grannis, the retired Western Asset economist at the blog Calafia Beach Pundit, says, U.S. bond markets could now be pricing in about 2-2.5% U.S. GDP growth going forward. It isn’t mind-blowing growth, but it isn’t too bad considering where we have come from.

    So bond yields are, yes, rising, but today shows that it is for the right reasons. They’re making a full-V, signaling a full-V for the broader economy as well.

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • Santa Anita Park Race 5 Horse Racing Betting Pick Wednesday 4-7-10

    Our horse racing pick will come from Race 5 at Santa Anita on Wednesday. It’s a Cal bred maiden race going 1 mile on the Turf for three year olds and up. With our free pick we will play on #3 My Boy Walsh to win. The fifth at Santa Anita is scheduled for a 6:05PM Eastern Time post and you can watch it on TVG.

    My Boy Walsh is ridden by Tyler Baze and trained by Gary Sherlock. This three year old gelding is lightly race and will be making his fourth start on Wednesday. He tried the turf for the first time in career and posted his best Brisnet figure with an 83, which is best in this field on the grass. I liked the fact he is stretching out to a mile in this one. He has a nice bullet work on March 24th leading to this event.

    Play #3 My Boy Walsh to win race 5 at Santa Anita 4-1 on the Morning Line.

    Post Time at 6:05PM Eastern Time televised by TVG

    Courtesy of Tonys Picks

  • GM to build 200 replicas of Chevrolet Camaro Indianapolis 500 Pace Car

    General Motors has announced that it will build and sell a replica of its Camaro Indianapolis 500 Pace Car.

    “We set out to build a collectible vehicle that will appeal to the die-hard Camaro and Indianapolis 500 fan,” said Jim Campbell, U.S. Vice President, Chevrolet Marketing. “We believe we’ve done just that with the 2010 Chevy Camaro Indianapolis 500 Pace Car Limited Edition.”

    This limited edition replica includes all the features found on a top-of-the-line regular production Camaro SS, but adds some additional features unique to the actual pace car to be driven by Robin Roberts, anchor of “Good Morning America,” during the this year’s Indianapolis 500.

    GM said it will build up to 200 replicas with a manufacturer suggested retail price of the replica is $41,950 (includes $850 Destination Freight Charge).

    Based on a Camaro 2SS model with an RS appearance package, the replica includes the following content:

    • 400 hp 6.2L V8
    • 6-speed automatic transmission with remote start
    • 20-inch polished aluminum wheels
    • Full body White Pearl decal rally stripes
    • Inferno Orange heritage front grille
    • Inferno Orange engine cover
    • Premium floor mats with accent colors
    • 2010 Indianapolis 500 event logo decal on both doors and embroidered on driver and passenger headrests
    • 2010 Indianapolis 500 event logo badges on front fenders

    2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS 2010 Indianapolis 500 Pace Car:

    2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS 2010 Indianapolis 500 Pace Car 2010 Chevrolet Camaro Indianapolis 500 Pace Car 2010 Chevrolet Camaro Indianapolis 500 Pace Car 2010 Chevrolet Camaro Indianapolis 500 Pace Car

    – By: Omar Rana


  • Bone Marrow: Delicious, Nutritious and Underappreciated

    boneMarrowIf you’re truly interested in consuming the original Primal brain food, look no further than bone marrow: perhaps the first reliable source of large, fatty animal products our scrappy ancestors were able to procure. Yes, before we became spear-using cunning tacticians surrounding, stalking, and out-maneuvering large prehistoric ungulates, we feasted on the bones of fallen prey. Or, more accurately, we feasted on what lurked inside the bones (and the skulls, for that matter). Animal fat and protein improved the quality of our diet by making digestion less energy intensive. Bone marrow, especially, was highly caloric and nutrient dense, allowing early human ancestors to divert metabolic resources away from the costly digestion of roughage and toward bigger, costlier brains. This spurred the increase in hominid brain size that we still enjoy today.

    That was around two million years ago, when Homo habilis used rudimentary stone tools to strip and smash bones. He was small and relatively diminutive – too small to take down big game – but he could hoist a big smashing stone overhead once the apex predators had gone. And he could probably fend off the hyenas, the vultures, and any other scavengers dead set on sucking the marrow. In fact, we may have learned about the delicious, nourishing paste by watching vultures drop femurs from the sky and pick out the marrow.

    There’s clearly something special (nutritionally) about bone marrow. Animals go for the marrow, instinctively, for example. Wolves given access to full deer carcasses gravitated toward those bones with “high marrow yields,” taking care to “destroy the epiphyses” where the marrow was most plentiful. When I toss my dog a big smorgasbord of raw bones, organs, and muscle meat, he heads straight for the marrow before anything else, every single time. It goes marrow, liver, heart, muscle meat. It’s interesting to see what the high-powered, raw senses of a nearly obligate carnivore chooses when determining which animal product is best to eat.

    As for the nutritional content, consider this data (PDF) on standard “African ruminant marrow”, courtesy of Loren Cordain. Three and a half ounces of the stuff contain 488 calories, 51 grams of fat (mostly monounsaturated, as I understand), and 7 grams of protein – extremely dense. I can understand why we were driven to come up with new methods of obtaining it. The way wild animals and traditional cultures prized it as much or more so than other fatty, rich cuts suggests that there’s more to marrow than just the fat.

    As we all know, meat, especially fatty meat, contains more than just a lopsided macronutrient ratio. Meat, or any animal product, really, is the best, densest source of fat-soluble vitamins around. Liver, heart, brains, ribeye are all prize cuts for their taste, their nutrition, and the various bioavailable micronutrients that come loaded in every delicious bite. Plus, marrow isn’t just static stuff inside the bones. It fulfills a role. It fulfills many roles, actually. It’s made of osteoblasts (which form bone cells using minerals), adipocytes (fat cells), fibroblasts (which form connective tissue), and osteoclasts (which are responsible for bone resorption). I was unable to obtain detailed info regarding the mineral/vitamin content of bone marrow, but if it’s involved in bone and connective tissue formation/resorption, there are probably some choice components that make consumption particularly advantageous.

    There’s another reason – a big reason, actually – why animals of all stripes are drawn toward bone marrow and why you should head down to the butcher for some bones: the taste. A subtle, creamy nuttiness, sometimes a bit sweet, always extremely rich, is not to be casually disregarded. The taste is incredible, either eaten straight up with a touch of sea salt or as part of a rich, hearty stew. Its high quality fuel imbued with vitamins and minerals, but it’s delicious fuel that’d be worth eating even if it were devoid of nutrition. Luckily for us, though (and counter to what we’re taught about nutrition), what appeals to our taste buds on a basic level usually also nourishes. Marrow may be a “sinful treat” for most, but it deserves to be a kitchen staple for Primal eaters.

    Bones are cheap, and most people that buy them buy them for their dogs. You’ll even see marrow bones marked as “dog bones” in shops. Personally, I’m glad they’re an underappreciated food. If people think of them as dog food, they stay inexpensive. Dogs crave them, love them, but they can’t really spur demand and constrain supply. They alone can’t drive the prices up. So, for the time being, marrow bones, even the grass-fed stuff, remain highly affordable.

    Look for broad bones with big thick tubes of marrow. The bones themselves are great fun for making stock afterwards, but you’re paying for the marrow, so make sure you pick some meaty ones. I’d skip Whole Foods. They charge about four bucks a pound for marrow bones, and they’re from conventional, grain-fed cows. If you’re buying grain-fed, you might as well buy them from a local grocer for a couple bucks or, better yet, from an Asian grocer for less than a dollar per pound. Grass-fed is best, of course, and the best way to get quality grass-fed bone marrow bones is from local or online farmers. Try Eat Wild if your farmers’ market meat guy doesn’t carry any. A few of the bone-in cuts will also have a nice shot of marrow, so keep that in mind.

    The simplest, best way to prepare marrow is to roast the bones upright at 350 degrees Fahrenheit for 15 minutes. Fat will leak out the bottom, and you want to eat it all, so use a pan, or at least catch the drippings with molded foil. When the marrow begins to slightly bubble, it’s ready to be eaten. Thicker bones may need a bit more time in the oven, or you could do what I do and eat it slightly pink. Buy from a trustworthy, reputable source and you’ll be fine. Use a narrow spoon or fork to scrape out the marrow (you can even use a dedicated marrow spoon, if you can find one) and top with a bit of coarse sea salt. Serve with a small parsley, shallot, and lemon juice salad to cut through the creaminess of the marrow.

    4406988299 4a9057676d 1

    Getting every last bit of marrow out can be hard for beginners. The interior of the bone isn’t smooth, but rather rutted and uneven. If your spoon or fork isn’t fulfilling its duty to your satisfaction, use a combination of applied suction and probing tongue. The suction will loosen any stubborn bits, allowing the tongue to snap ‘em right up. Another option entirely is to forgo the cutlery and apply suction directly to the loaded bone. It’s a tricky move, because you’ve got to strike a balance between warm enough to slide out and hot enough to burn your mouth, but if you’re able to master the preemptive slurp, nothing compares to a mouthful of gelatinous marrow.

    If you haven’t tried it yet, get out there and buy some marrow bones. Beef is standard, but any other large mammals will work. And the next time you do a big bone-in roast, whether it’s beef, veal, random African ruminant, or lamb leg, treasure the bone. Don’t dump it into the stock pot right away. Instead, lay it out lovingly on a flat, sturdy surface. Slice it lengthwise if you’ve got the means; otherwise, take a sledgehammer or a big rock and reduce the bone to pieces. Pick the shards clean and suck them dry. Then, and only then, may you toss them in the stockpot (although seeing as how those shards went spelunking in your mouth, you may want to limit the resultant soup’s ultimate audience).

    Sucking on marrow bones seems to unlock latent primal (small “p”) urges in all of us, but that’s okay (as long as you avoid it as a first date meal). If you find yourself turning progressively more feral as the marrow disappears from the bone, don’t worry. Even vegetarians have been observed scrounging, slurping, and gnawing at the remains of a bone marrow meal. When it comes to getting the last delicious bits of bone marrow, total paleo reenactment is the only justifiable course of action.

    Are you a fan of bone marrow? Never tried it? Share your thoughts in the comment board. Thanks, everyone!

    Get Free Health Tips, Recipes and Workouts Delivered to Your Inbox

    Related posts:

    1. Calorie Restriction and Bone Loss
    2. 10 Delicious DIY Salad Dressings
    3. Your Belly Bone’s Connected to Your Brain Bone

  • Hyundai Sonata Hybrid

    Hyundai ha presentado en el Salón de Nueva York un nueva berlina híbrida. Se trata del Hyundai Sonata Hybrid y que hará uso de la tecnología de los nuevos motores Theta II de 2.4 litros y dos propulsores eléctricos que ofrecen de manera final una potencia máxima de 209 CV.

    Hyundai Sonata Hybrid

    Su consumo estará situado alrededor de los 6 litros/100 km. Además, el Hyundai Sonata Hybrid podrá funcionar utilizando solamente su motor eléctrico con el que podrá acelerar hasta los 100 km/h. Por el momento desconocemos la autonomía del motor eléctrico.

    Sus motores estarán asociados auna caja de cambios automática de seis velocidades. Inicialmente se venderá en Estados Unidos aunque se espera que también se comercialice en Europa.

    Related posts:

    1. Fotos espía del Hyundai Sonata 2010
    2. Hyundai desarrolla un deportivo eléctrico para 2012
    3. Infiniti M35 Hybrid
  • Review: 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour hatches a new niche

    Filed under: , , ,

    2010 Honda Crosstour – Click above for high-res image gallery

    Its introduction was a case study in how to bungle an automotive social media campaign. Badly. It had people running for thesauruses to find new and fascinating synonyms for “ugly.” Its TV campaign has something to do with jazz music and animals. And yet, for all the hubbub, hysterics and lamentations that Honda had completely lost its mind, the 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour quietly showed up and began finding customers.

    Last month – its best sales performance to date – 2,587 people drove the odd-looking hatchwagon home. Recently, we took delivery of our own Crosstour EX-L tester, loaded-up with all-wheel drive and navigation, to see how we felt about spending a week with Honda’s latest experiment.

    Photos by Drew Phillips / Copyright (C)2010 Weblogs, Inc.

    Continue reading Review: 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour hatches a new niche

    Review: 2010 Honda Accord Crosstour hatches a new niche originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 07 Apr 2010 11:57:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments

  • Net Neutrality Battle Quickly Turns Into Political Food Fight

    Well, well. For a legal ruling that really has no direct impact on the actual case it’s about, the decision that the FCC can’t punish Comcast for breaking net neutrality sure got people worked up. Suddenly there’s talk of the FCC reaching for the so-called “nuclear option.” What’s that? It would involve reclassifying broadband as a common carrier service. Of course, this would be a reversal for the FCC, which (under the previous administration) pushed hard to reclassify both DSL and cable broadband as information services (not regulated) instead of telco services (regulated).

    The whole thing is a bit of a mess — and, once again, distracts from the larger issues (i.e., the lack of real competition in the space). Now, there’s a reasonable argument to be made that both services do, in fact, have common carrier status. The argument is stronger with DSL, which is built on telco infrastructure that, at one point, was built and run through a gov’t-granted monopoly. But, with both, you are dealing with public rights of way, which at least give some legitimacy to the idea that they should fall under a category that involves oversight from the FCC. But, having already flipped the switch one way, going back the other way is not going to be as easy. Unlike five years ago, when this issue was mostly ignored by politicians, this time around, everyone’s gearing up. And, unfortunately, rather than a debate on the issues (and, oh boy, are there issues), it’s shaping up along partisan lines, which isn’t good for anyone.

    You’ve got Rep. Joe Barton warning the FCC not to reclassify, while Senator John Kerry is suggesting the FCC should reclassify. Kerry’s statement is pretty damn amusing:


    “I am not advocating that the FCC reclassify broadband services as a result of this decision, but I absolutely believe they maintain that legal authority and it would be entirely consistent with the history of communications law in our country if they did.”

    In other words, “I’m not saying reclassifying, but you should reclassify.” Meanwhile, across the aisle, Senator Orrin Hatch is already signaling that any attempt by Congress to give the FCC the necessary mandate will be fought hard by the Republicans. Though, his reasoning is specious. While I agree that the FCC’s attempt to regulate the internet is outside its mandate, the following statement is pure drivel:


    “This is also good news for the future prosperity of the Internet, because there is now an actual incentive to expand capacity, which benefits consumers and our economy alike.”

    There is nothing about the ruling that gives anyone incentive to expand capacity. In fact, it does the exact opposite. It gives broadband providers the incentive to limit uses instead of expanding capacity. If there were real competition, however, then there would be incentives to expand capacity. Too bad no one seems focused on that at all. Instead, it looks like we’ll get another political food fight that won’t actually do anything about making sure that we have the broadband we need.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story





  • Survey Explains Why We’re Doomed To Housing Bubble After Housing Bubble After Housing Bubble

    fannie mae housing surveyA new Fannie Mae survey (via Felix Salmon) gives a sad picture of the American homebuyer.

    On one hand, people are cautious and have more doubts than ever about the safety of houses as investments.

    But…

    Basically, Americans still dream of owning a home and there’s little to dissuade them.

    Even after so much pain, there’s little hope people will stop wanting to own homes, and thus the government will inevitably oblige, sticking with all manner of incentives to keep the dream alive.

    See the sad news here >

    It’s true. Nobody really knows where housing is going.

    It's true. Nobody really knows where housing is going.

    Source: Fannie Mae

    Americans still think owning a home is a better deal than renting

    Americans still think owning a home is a better deal than renting

    Source: Fannie Mae

    Americans think it is a great time to buy a home

    Americans think it is a great time to buy a home

    Source: Fannie Mae

    Most Americans think homeownership is VERY important to local community

    Most Americans think homeownership is VERY important to local community

    Source: Fannie Mae

    A majority of non-homeowners WOULD buy a home if their credit didn’t suck… that’s prime market for a sub-prime lenders!

    A majority of non-homeowners WOULD buy a home if their credit didn't suck... that's prime market for a sub-prime lenders!

    Source: Fannie Mae

    Most believe homeownership is VERY important to the economy

    Most believe homeownership is VERY important to the economy

    Source: Fannie Mae

    13% of Americans have lost faith in real estate investments… BUT MOST STILL BELIEVE

    13% of Americans have lost faith in real estate investments... BUT MOST STILL BELIEVE

    Source: Fannie Mae

    If they had to move, most Americans would look for a house to buy

    If they had to move, most Americans would look for a house to buy

    Source: Fannie Mae

    A majority of homeowners say they have SACRIFICED to own their home

    A majority of homeowners say they have SACRIFICED to own their home

    Source: Fannie Mae

    Half of all renters plan on buying a home in the near future

    Half of all renters plan on buying a home in the near future

    Source: Fannie Mae

    Most Americans don’t care if you have an underwater mortgage or financial difficulties, you SHOULD NOT default on your mortgage

    Most Americans don't care if you have an underwater mortgage or financial difficulties, you SHOULD NOT default on your mortgage

    Source: Fannie Mae

    Most do not blame the mortgage company for the subprime crisis

    Most do not blame the mortgage company for the subprime crisis

    Source: Fannie Mae

    Most delinquent mortgagers have not even considered default

    Most delinquent mortgagers have not even considered default

    Source: Fannie Mae

    Because defaulting on your mortgage is “immoral”

    Because defaulting on your mortgage is "immoral"

    Source: Fannie Mae

    But here’s the thing: people WILL consider default if they see other people default

    But here's the thing: people WILL consider default if they see other people default

    Source: Fannie Mae

    And in the end, RENTERS are more confident about their financial situation

    And in the end, RENTERS are more confident about their financial situation

    Source: Fannie Mae

    Now check out…

     Now check out...

    Image: Zillow

    The 10 Housing Markets In America That Are Still Wildly Overvalued

    Join the conversation about this story »