Author: Serkadis

  • Ron Paul: Winning the Hearts and Votes of Conservatives

    Ron Paul discusses his big win last weekend in the CPAC 2010 Presidential Straw Poll.

    To help convince Fox executives to put Judge Napolitano’s great online show Freedom Watch on TV, please watch the entire episode at the official Freedom Watch site.

    Show: Freedom Watch
    Host: Judge Andrew Napolitano
    Channel: FoxNews.com
    Date: 02/23/2010

    Transcript coming soon

    Share/Bookmark

    Related posts:

    1. Tea Party Infiltration & Secret Greece Bailout? Show: Freedom Watch Host: Judge Andrew Napolitano Channel: FoxNews.com…
    2. FoxNews.com: Ron Paul Rocks CPAC FoxNews.com: “Rep. Ron Paul, former Republican presidential candidate and leading…
    3. Ron Paul: Be Prepared for the Worst Show: Freedom Watch Channel: FoxNews.com Date: 11/03/2009 Judge Andrew…
  • Touch Pro2 Android forum now up with good content

    loliz The Touch Pro2 and Android world are becoming increasingly closer, so close XDA has an all new Android forum for it. The new Android forum for the Touch Pro2 is up and running and so far, it has some good stuff. The new forum was most likely created due to the over population of Android content in the ROM development section, but now you will not have to worry about that. If you have a minute of time in your day, you should heard over to the forum and maybe find something that fits you.

  • Man with early stages of Alzheimer’s is missing

    Police and relatives of a Bloomington man who has been missing since Monday are asking for the public’s help in finding him.

    Baltazar Aguilera, 64, is diabetic and in the early stages of Alzheimer’s disease, his family told police. He does not carry a cell phone.

    In a news release Tuesday, police said Aguilera drove from his home on Dennis Drive at about 12:30 p.m. Monday to pick up his son at the La Quinta Hotel on Brock Drive. He never arrived.

    Aguilera is 5 feet, 5 inches tall, weighs about 130 pounds and has brown eyes and brown hair. He was last seen wearing a black winter jacket, brown pants and a black baseball cap. He was driving a gray 1999 Chevrolet Malibu with license plate number G 884216.

    Anyone with information about him is asked to call the Bloomington communications center at 820-8888.

     

    Read the original article from Journal Star.

    Distributed via Chicago Press Release Services


  • Administration Asks For Public Input On Intellectual Property Enforcement

    As part of the mis-named ProIP act, the newly created IP Enforcement Coordinator (generally called the IP Czar) is supposed to help figure out what an effective “intellectual property enforcement strategy” would be. While we have questions about why this position or this plan is really needed in the first place, here’s a bit of good news: rather than just doing the typical consult with industry lobbyists, the administration is, again, asking for public comment (pdf):


    This request for comments and for
    recommendations for an improved
    enforcement strategy is divided into two
    parts. In the first, the IPEC seeks written
    submissions from the public regarding
    the costs to the U.S. economy resulting
    from intellectual property violations,
    and the threats to public health and
    safety created by infringement. In the
    second part, the IPEC requests detailed
    recommendations from the public
    regarding the objectives and content of
    the Joint Strategic Plan and other
    specific recommendations for improving
    the Government’s intellectual property
    enforcement efforts. Responses to this
    request for comments may be directed to
    either of these two parts, or both, and
    may include a response to one or more
    requests for information found in either
    part.

    The link above has more details, and the comments are due by Wednesday, March 24, 2010.

    Now, I know when I posted my comments submitted to the USTR about the Special 301 process, a number of commenters wondered if the USTR would care, or even bother to look at, let alone consider, comments from the public beyond industry lobbyists. It is a valid concern. And while I do still wonder how much public comments will play a role in the actual strategy (compared to industry responses), in this case, the IPEC specifically reached out to Techdirt to let us know about this request for comment, to see if we would be interested in alerting our readers of their opportunity to take part. Now, the cynical response is that this is just window dressing — and it’s a lot easier to ask for comments from the public than to listen to them, but the fact that they are specifically reaching out to this community (among others) at least suggests an interest in what folks here might have to say. With that in mind, I’m hopeful that some of you will take the time to submit thoughtful comments on the subject.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story





  • Ron Paul: Bringing People Together

    Ron Paul appeared on the Dylan Ratigan Show today to express his concern that perpetual war is ruining America.

    He said that if the GOP wants to be a major party they must return to constitutional conservative values and work on ending the wars, balancing the budget, guaranteeing civil liberties, and auditing the Fed.

    Ron Paul also invited progressives who are concerned about civil liberties and warmongering to join his growing movement.

    Show: Dylan Ratigan Show
    Host: Dylan Ratigan
    Channel: MSNBC
    Date: 02/23/2010

    Transcript coming soon

    Share/Bookmark

    Related posts:

    1. Ron Paul on MSNBC: Audit the Federal Reserve! Show: Morning Meeting Channel: MSNBC Date: 7/22/2009 Transcript Dylan…
    2. Ron Paul on MSNBC’s Morning Meeting with Dylan Ratigan Show: Morning Meeting Host: Dylan Ratigan Channel: MSNBC Date:…
    3. Ron Paul: We need to audit the Federal Reserve, now more than ever! Show: Morning Meeting Channel: MSNBC Date: 11/05/2009 Transcript: Dylan…
  • Ron Paul and Rand Paul Discuss Healthcare & National Security

    Government involvement in health care eliminates price competition and therefore increases costs, asserted Rand Paul, who appeared with his father Ron Paul on CNN’s Situation Room today. The Obama administration’s notion that increased health care spending won’t increase the debt is ridiculous, and new solutions are required.

    Ron Paul attacked the government for fighting undeclared wars; the sooner we end them, the better, because they are one of the causes of the US government’s de facto bankruptcy.

    Rand Paul stated that the government’s primary purpose is national defense; therefore, any potential war should be carefully debated before it is actually started.

    Rand Paul is running for the US Senate in Kentucky. Check out his website at RandPaul2010.com

    Show: Situation Room
    Host: Wolf Blitzer
    Channel: CNN
    Date: 02/23/2010

    Transcript coming soon

    Share/Bookmark

    Related posts:

    1. Ron Paul and Rand Paul discuss Politics and Healthcare on CNN Show: CNN American Morning Date: August 6, 2009 Host:…
    2. Rand Paul for Senate 2010 Ron Paul sent out the following email today: Dear Friend,…
    3. Rand Paul’s Tea Party and Money Bomb Endorsed by Ron Paul Ron Paul’s son Rand Paul…
  • Capcom’s COO Mark Beaumont passes away

    A sad day for the video game industry today as Mark Beaumont, Capcom’s Chief Operating Officer for North America and Europe, has tragically passed away due to heart attack.
     
     
     

  • Stocks pull back after surprising drop in consumer confidence

    The stock market pulled back Tuesday after a surprising drop in consumer confidence reminded investors of the fragility of the economic recovery.

    The Dow Jones industrials fell 100 points. Interest rates also fell as investors moved money out of stocks and into the safety of Treasurys.

    The Conference Board said its consumer confidence index fell to 46 in February from 56.5 last month. That was well below the forecast of economists polled by Thomson Reuters. They expected a reading of 55.

    Not only did the index fall sharply, it is far from indicating strength in the economy. A reading above 90 means the economy is on solid footing. Consumers are vital to a strong, sustained economic recovery because their spending accounts for more than two-thirds of all economic activity.

    The confidence numbers came as investors were already rethinking the more optimistic assessment they had of the economy last week. Stocks had rallied for four straight days on upbeat earnings news, including some from retailers, and on improving housing and manufacturing numbers.

    That rally has ended this week in response to a growing pile of disappointing consumer news, including retail earnings reports. While Home Depot Inc., Sears Holdings Corp., Macy’s Inc. and Target Corp. all reported better-than-expected earnings Tuesday, the companies indicated that sales growth is lagging. That’s a sign that consumers are still too hesitant about the economy and their own job security to spend freely.

    “Consumers are still just very confused,” said J. Garrett Stevens, CEO of FaithShares, which manages exchange-traded funds. Economic reports remain mixed, which is typical for this point in a recovery and add to uncertainty among investors, he said.

    “Until we get more consistently positive trends, it’s like to be choppy like this,” Stevens said.

    According to preliminary calculations, the Dow Jones industrial average fell 100.97, or 1 percent, to 10,292.41 after being up around 19 before the consumer confidence index was released. The Standard & Poor’s 500 index dropped 13.41, or 1.2 percent, to 1,094.60, while the Nasdaq composite index fell 28.59, or 1.3 percent, to 2,213.44.

    About two stocks fell for every one that rose on the New York Stock Exchange, where volume came to 1.08 billion shares.

    Stocks have been volatile during the first two months of the year, alternating between multi-week stretches of gains and losses. Stocks rallied the past two weeks on signs of domestic growth after a nearly monthlong drop because of worries that European debt problems would upend a global economic recovery.

    The Chicago Board Options Exchange’s Volatility Index, which is known as the market’s fear gauge, shot up 7.2 percent Tuesday. An increase in the VIX signals that investors are prepared for swings in the market.

    Meanwhile, interest rates fell in the bond market as Treasury prices rose. Investors were betting that a weak recovery will force the Federal Reserve to keep interest rates low. The yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury note, which moves opposite its price, fell to 3.69 percent from 3.80 percent late Monday.

    Investors will get further insight into potential interest rate changes when Fed chairman Ben Bernanke testifies before Congress on Wednesday and Thursday.

    A modest increase in sales and cost-cutting helped Home Depot’s profit top expectations. The home improvement retailer also raised its dividend and outlook, evidence it is confident about the strength of an eventual recovery. Competitor Lowe’s Corp. on Monday also raised its outlook, but had a cautious tone about growth.

    Like Home Depot, Sears Holdings said falling expenses and a slight boost in sales helped its profit surpass forecasts. Macy’s and Target also reported upbeat quarterly earnings.

    A report on home prices showed that the housing market continues its slow recovery. The Standard & Poor’s/Case-Shiller 20-city home price index rose 0.3 percent from November to December.

    Home prices’ rate of decline from a year earlier also improved. That measure fell 3.1 percent. Economists had forecast a year-over-year drop of 3.2 percent, compared with a decline of 5.3 percent in November.

    “Case-Shiller shows some of this continuing bottoming effect in housing prices,” said Michael Strauss, chief economist at Commonfund. “It shows the weakest link in the economy is no longer a drag on the economy.”

    Overseas markets mostly fell after disappointing economic reports from Germany showed that Europe’s largest economy has been hurt by the mounting debt problems in countries like Greece.

    Germany’s DAX index fell 1.5 percent and France’s CAC-40 dropped 1.3 percent. Britain’s FTSE 100 fell 0.7 percent. Japan’s Nikkei stock average fell 0.5 percent.

    The dollar was mixed against other major currencies. It rose against the euro and fell against the British pound. Gold and oil both fell, joining other commodities as investors shied away from investments seen as risky.

    The Russell 2000 index of smaller companies fell 7.18, or 1.1 percent, to 625.07.

     

    Read the original article from Journal Star.

    Distributed via Chicago Press Release Services


  • Quinn stands behind tax increase

    Gov. Pat Quinn says he thinks it’s “necessary” the Illinois House consider a plan to raise the state income tax that passed the Illinois Senate last year.

    Quinn said Tuesday getting more revenue is one of four things the state must do to weather a “financial crisis.” The deficit could reach $13 billion this year.

    He says the three other steps the state must take are more budget cuts, borrowing money and getting as much federal money as possible.

    The Democratic governor will offer more budget details Wednesday on a new Web site, and on March 10, when he delivers his annual budget address.

    Quinn wants lawmakers to consider borrowing $250 million for health care so the state can get more federal matching money. And, he wants lawmakers to consider letting universities borrow to pay their bills.

    Read the original article from Journal Star.

    Distributed via Chicago Press Release Services


  • Quinn: Duckworth rejects Lt. Governor offer

    Illinois Gov. Pat Quinn says Iraq war veteran Tammy Duckworth doesn’t want to be considered for lieutenant governor.

    Quinn said Duckworth told him Tuesday she will keep her job at the Veterans Administration in Washington. She is a former director of the Illinois Department of Veterans Affairs.

    Quinn won’t say who is his second choice for lieutenant governor.

    Quinn and Democratic Party leaders are in the hunt for a new lieutenant governor nominee because primary winner Scott Lee Cohen dropped out after questions were raised about his past.

    Cohen left the race after it became widely known he was accused of abusing his ex-wife and arrested for holding a knife to the throat of an ex-girlfriend. He denied the allegations concerning his ex-wife, and charges relating to his arrest were dropped.

    Read the original article from Journal Star.

    Distributed via Chicago Press Release Services


  • Peoria making its case for Google Internet service experiment

    The campaign is on to bring super-speed Internet service to Peoria.

    Joining forces with Peoria County, Peoria Mayor Jim Ardis on Tuesday urged area residents to log onto www.googlepeoria.com on Wednesday to send a message to Google.

    Google announced earlier this month it will build a handful of experimental networks around the country to connect consumers to the Internet, allowing for faster delivery of online video and other advanced applications the search company wants to deliver.

    Communities have until March 26 to present their case to get the speedy service.

    Peoria may have an advantage, Ardis said during a news conference at the Peoria NEXT Innovation Center. “We already have a built-in marketing slogan for the ages,” he said, referring to the “Will It Play In Peoria” line.

    At-large City Councilman Ryan Spain said an area-wide wireless study the city did two years ago will complete the technical portion of the application to Google. “That means we can spend more time in energizing our citizens,” he said.

    That is important, said Jeff Huberman, dean of Bradley University’s Slane College of Communications. “We have the need for speed. The Google program would connect all the resources across central Illinois for 300,000 people. This is a network far greater than each individual part,” he said, noting Bradley used high-speed Internet 2 service in recent years. “People expect technology to evolve but, with this initiative, we’d jump to the head of the line. It will be life-altering.”

    Dr. Andy Chiou, a faculty member at the University of Illinois College of Medicine at Peoria, said a more powerful Internet would better serve the area’s medical community. “A tremendous amount of bandwidth is needed for medical imaging,” he said.

    Chiou likened the opportunity to use advanced Internet service with building a highway. “This is a game-changer for the community,” he said.

    For Tim Couillard, an Internet marketer in Peoria Heights, the Google test would provide astounding speed for consumers. “You’ll be able to download a full-length movie in five minutes or over 250 songs in eight seconds,” he said.

    Couillard said the Facebook page he set up last week to urge bringing Google fiber to Peoria already has more than 1,000 fans. “If we got (Google) in Peoria, I know 50 people who would move here just for the Internet,” said Couillard.

    Peoria County Board member Mike Phelan said the county supports the Google campaign. “Faster connections would benefit public safety. A faster network means faster response times,” he said, adding that rural communities in the area also would benefit.

    The Google project will get plenty of attention here over the next month. Look for billboards to sprout up across the community, encouraging residents to promote Peoria’s case online.

    “I’ll be getting sore hands from banging the drum for this,” said Ardis. “Access to high-speed data is the most important infrastructure in the 21st century. Our research indicates there are over 1,200 employers that would benefit from this technology immediately and over 13,000 small businesses that would benefit from this in the next few years.”

     

    Steve Tarter can be reached at 686-3260 or [email protected].

    Read the original article from Journal Star.

    Distributed via Chicago Press Release Services


  • Live from City Hall

    The City Council meets at 6:15 p.m. today to review a potentially massive overhaul to Washington Street/U.S Route 24. Other items of interest include a vote on a new sign at Westlake Shopping Center and increased investment into the Northmoor Road construction project. Follow the council meeting tonight on twitter.com/pjstarlive.

     

    Read the original article from Journal Star.

    Distributed via Chicago Press Release Services


  • One arrested, no injuries in Mahomet incident

    Mahomet incident
    Photo by: John Dixon/The News-Gazette

    Champaign County sheriff’s deputyies prepare weapons at the Heritage Inn Motel, on Eastwood Drive in Mahomet, after receiving a report of a man holding a woman hostage with a knife on Tuesday. A man was arrested about 30 minutes after the incident began, just before 5 p.m.

    Distributed via Chicago Press Release Services


  • Charting the Beatles: Exploration of Beatles Music through Infographics

    beatles_infographics.jpg
    Charting the Beatles [mikemake.com] is a still ongoing project to analyze the music of the Beatles through the use of infographics. The Flickr group with the same name contains a plethora of diagrams and charts taken from secondary sources, including but not limited to, sales statistics, biographies, recording session notes, sheet music, and raw audio readings.

    Michael Deal, the initiator of this project, might have designed the most impressive graphs of them all. One includes the depiction of authorship and collaboration, which naturally traces the songwriting contributions within the band. Another diagram analyzes the self-references occurring in the song lyrics, noting the exact referencing lyrics and at what point in each song they can be found. The circular “Working Schedule” focuses on revealing similarities in their main activities from year to year.

    The ultimate goal is to start a larger and open collaborative project currently to be published on chartingthebeatles.com.


  • The Inherent Conflict of Interest with DOJ’s OPR and David Margolis

    photo: akshaydavis via Flickr

    Who watches the watchers? Always a valid question; today I want to look at the DOJ Office of Professional Responsibility and its conduct in the investigation of United States governmental attorneys, specifically within the Office of Legal Counsel, involved in the Bush/Cheney torture program. Aside from the facts and conclusions (discussion underway here, here and here), the report is notable for the process producing it, namely the DOJ investigating itself and, not so shockingly, exculpating itself. This will be the first in a series of more specific posts on this blog discussing the multiple, and severe, conflict of interest issues inherent in the OPR Report.

    The first, and most obvious, issue of conflict with OPR is that it places evaluation and resolution of ethical complaints against DOJ attorneys in the hands of the DOJ. The power to determine whether there is any impropriety is solely within the hands of those supervising and/or ultimately responsible for the impropriety. Pursuant to 28 C.F.R. § 0.39a, OPR reports directly to the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General. A vested interest if there ever was one.

    Most governmental agencies have independent Inspectors General which operate independently of the agency leadership, have jurisdiction of the entire agency including legal counsel, and thus have credibility as somewhat neutral and detached evaluators and voices. Not so the DOJ, who has arrogated upon themselves the sole right to sit in judgment of themselves. This action to grab the exclusive authority for themselves and exclude the independent IG was first accomplished by Attorney General Order 1931-94 dated November 8, 1994 subsequently codified into the Code of Federal Regulations and reinforced through section 308 of the 2002 Department of Justice Reauthorization Act. Just in time for the war on terror legal shenanigans!

    Glenn Fine, the DOJ IG has given Congressional testimony to the US Senate regarding the inherent conflict:

    Second, the current limitation on the DOJ OIG’s jurisdiction prevents the OIG – which by statute operates independent of the agency – from investigating an entire class of misconduct allegations involving DOJ attorneys’ actions, and instead assigns this responsibility to OPR, which is not statutorily independent and reports directly to the Attorney General and the Deputy Attorney General. In effect, the limitation on the OIG’s jurisdiction creates a conflict of interest and contravenes the rationale for establishing independent Inspectors General throughout the government. It also permits an Attorney General to assign an investigation that raises questions about his conduct or the conduct of his senior staff to OPR, an entity that reports to and is supervised by the Attorney General and Deputy Attorney General and that lacks the insulation and independence guaranteed by the IG Act.

    This concern is not merely hypothetical. Recently, the Attorney General directed OPR to investigate aspects of the removal of U.S. Attorneys. In essence, the Attorney General assigned OPR – an entity that does not have statutory independence and reports directly to the Deputy Attorney General and Attorney General – to investigate a matter involving the Attorney General’s and the Deputy Attorney General’s conduct. The IG Act created OIGs to avoid this type of conflict of interest. It created statutorily independent offices to investigate allegations of misconduct throughout the entire agency, including actions of agency leaders. All other federal agencies operate this way, and the DOJ should also.

    Third, while the OIG operates transparently, OPR does not. The OIG publicly releases its reports on matters of public interest, with the facts and analysis underlying our conclusions available for review. In contrast, OPR operates in secret. Its reports, even when they examine matters of significant public interest, are not publicly released.

    The entirety of Fine’s testimony is instructive, the cited portion is taken from pages 12-16.

    So what do the numbers and data exhibit for the OPR’s effort at professional responsibility and accountability? Not a very compelling story at all. From a Crime & Federalism look at the 2006 numbers which were, until recently, the most current information available:

    Of 869 complaints, less than 10% were even deemed worthy of an investigation. Not bad, right? Even if you’re reported, the odds are clearly in your favor.

    Perhaps one will say that crank litigants make a lot of frivolous complaints. That would be wrong. Sixty-nine percent of investigated complaints were initiated by judges. Private lawyers and private litigants amounted for less than 3% of complaints leading to investigation.

    Of the 84 cases worthy of investigation (58 of which were cases where a judge had already found prosecutorial misconduct), in only 18 cases were prosecutors disciplined. According to OPR, there is a crisis within the federal judiciary.

    Federal judges are making frivolous allegations of prosecutorial misconduct. After all, federal judges found prosecutorial misconduct in at least 58 cases. Yet OPR only found prosecutorial misconduct in 18 of those 58 cases. (58-18 = 40 federal judges filing frivolous complaints.)

    The numbers don’t add up. DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility investigated less than 10% of all reported cases of prosecutorial misconduct. While federal judges found prosecutorial misconduct in 58 cases, DOJ only found prosecutorial misconduct in 18 of those 58 cases. It’s pretty clear that the Department of Justice cannot be trusted to investigate itself.

    Self-policing is a failure. In 2009 alone, there have been nearly a dozen high-profile cases of prosecutorial misconduct. If OPR continues its mission, those prosecutors can sleep easy. The odds are clearly on their side.

    The just recently released 2007 OPR Annual Report is no better than that of 2006, and arguably even more bleak.

    So how can the public have trust in the determinations of the OPR when it comes to allegations of misconduct by high level DOJ officials? Simply put, it cannot. Judges have no trust nor respect for the OPR either. In January of 2008, Massachusetts District Court Judge Mark Wolf sent a scathing letter to the Attorney General stating inter alia:

    “The [Justice] Department’s performance in the Auerhahn matter raises serious questions about whether judges should continue to rely upon the department to investigate and sanction misconduct by federal prosecutors,” wrote Wolf, who last July, after expressing frustration with his punishment, took the unusual step of asking the Massachusetts Board of Bar Overseers to launch disciplinary proceedings against Auerhahn.

    Wolf also wrote that “the department’s failure to be candid and consistent with the court has become disturbingly common in the District of Massachusetts.”

    Wolf is far from alone, from a fantastic and stunning article in the American Bar Association Journal entitled “The Roach Motel” comes the description of how Judge Emmet Sullivan of the DC District Court feels about the competence of the OPR:

    Mistrusting the OPR, Sullivan took things a step further. He dismissed the case on April 7 and appointed a special prosecutor to investigate six of the lawyers from the department’s Public Integrity Section involved with the trial.

    The judge said he had been lodging OPR complaints for varying violations since autumn, but had heard nothing of them. “The silence has been deafening,” he said. And the latest round of ethical accusations was “too serious and too numerous,” Sullivan said, to entrust the investigation to an office controlled by the attorney general with “no outside accountability.”

    Defense attorney Sullivan told the court he’d complained three times to Mukasey about the conduct and nev­er received so much as an acknowledgment. “Shocking, but not surprising,” Judge Sullivan responded.

    Two more lines from the American Bar Association speak volumes:

    “I used to call it the Roach Motel of the Justice Department,” says Fordham University law professor Bruce A. Green, a former federal prosecutor and ethics committee co-chair for the ABA Criminal Justice Section. “Cases check in, but they don’t check out.”

    and

    Under the Bush administration, probes of misconduct often went undisclosed because of the potential for personal embarrassment. Upon taking office, President Barack Obama admonished all federal agencies that such personal or political considerations shouldn’t weigh against the public interest. Probes should not be withheld just because they might cause discomfort.

    “These people should be embarrassed,” Green says.

    As amply demonstrated by the whitewash at the hands of the OPR and David Margolis, things have not particularly improved in the least under the hope and change of Barack Obama and Eric Holder. The Roach Motel is an absolute must read, and the OPR is still an embarrassment.

    Time after time the reports of frustration with the OPR process wind up with one name involved: David Margolis. Margolis is not even part of the OPR, yet controls every significant report emanating from the OPR and, by his own admission, has been the sole gatekeeper for any findings of misconduct “since the 1990s”. If Margolis has ever found misconduct by higher level officials in the department, I cannot find it. Of course that is not surprising in light of the secrecy and lack of transparency testified to by Glen Fine. Secrecy and opaqueness proudly wielded and ordered at the command of – you guessed it – David Margolis, who is concerned that his department’s attorneys not be “humiliated”. Public disclosure and trust is such a quaint thing compared to protecting your own it seems for Mr. Margolis.

    This is the one and same David Margolis who, in the rare and previously unheard of instance where findings of professional misconduct by DOJ leaders and/or elite attorneys such as the OLC crew of Yoo and Bybee actually were made by the OPR, took it upon himself to personally and unilaterally gut the findings and protect his own.

    But just as there is an inherent conflict in the DOJ’s use of the fiction of the OPR to police itself, so too does David Margolis have issues giving the distinct appearance of impropriety. Who and what is David Margolis? A definitive look at the man was made by the National Law Journal (subscription required):

    “Taking him on is a losing battle,” says the source. “The guy is Yoda. Nobody fucks with the guy.”
    ….
    Margolis cut his teeth as an organized-crime prosecutor, and he often uses mob analogies in talking about his career at the Justice Department. When asked by an incoming attorney general what his job duties entailed, Margolis responded: “I’m the department’s cleaner. I clean up messes.”

    The analogy calls to mind the character of Winston Wolfe, played by Harvey Keitel in the 1994 film “Pulp Fiction.” In the movie, Wolfe is called in by mob honchos to dispose of the evidence after two foot soldiers accidentally kill a murder witness in the back of their car.

    Further views into the professional soul of David Margolis, or lack thereof, can be found from Jeff Kaye, Scott Horton and more Scott Horton.

    So, the in-house “Yoda”, who considers himself the “department’s cleaner” is the guy the DOJ put in charge of protecting the American public from the virulent malfeasance of actors such as John Yoo and Jay Bybee, not to mention all the other cases that courts and citizens have been able to get no action on over the years. It seems that David Margolis has his own institutional interests that present an appearance of conflict with his duties to protect the public from malevolent lawyering by DOJ attorneys, especially high ranking ones. Pretty much explains everything.

    As I said at the outset, this is merely the first in a series of posts discussing the many and severe conflict issues surrounding the OPR Torture Report. From this general introduction, over the next few days, I will have more as will both Marcy and Mary.

  • Analysis: ABC News report shouldn’t panic Toyota drivers

    Filed under: , ,

    You may have noticed that there have been a large number of reports recently about Toyota and the continuing series of recalls it has announced in recent weeks. Here at Autoblog we try to be fair and tell the story as best we can without being inflammatory. Unfortunately, the same can not be said of all media outlets. ABC News, and reporter Brian Ross in particular, have been particularly vigorous in pursuit of a story – not the story.

    Let’s make one thing clear. Autoblog is not a cheerleading section for Toyota, or for trial lawyers, TV presenters or politicians with nothing better to do. We’d like to present the information to our readers without unnecessarily frightening anyone.

    We also want to avoid the sort of debacle that happened with CBS and the Audi 5000 in the ’80s and NBC with the General Motors side-saddle gas tanks in the ’90s. In each of those cases, tests were setup to “simulate” the purported problem, but the tests did not exactly simulate real world conditions and showed unrealistic scenarios.

    A recent report from Ross on ABC News featured an “automotive expert” named David W. Gilbert from Southern Illinois University attempting to demonstrate an electronic glitch in a Toyota Avalon. Let’s discuss this report in more detail after the jump.


    Tired of Toyota recall news? Try out the recall-free version of Autoblog.

    Continue reading Analysis: ABC News report shouldn’t panic Toyota drivers

    Analysis: ABC News report shouldn’t panic Toyota drivers originally appeared on Autoblog on Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:28:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments

  • Daily U-Turn: What you missed on 2.23.10

    Living with the Tesla Roadster Sport: One week in an electric light orchestra

    We spend a week with the Tesla Roadster Sport to see if life with a pure EV sports car is not only tolerable, but pleasurable.

    2012 Chevrolet Aveo makes an early debut

    The new Chevy Aveo takes all the right cues from its conceptual predecessor, and with a thoroughly revised interior, it’s finally ready to compete with the Ford Fiesta.

    Daily U-Turn: What you missed on 2.23.10 originally appeared on Autoblog on Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:20:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments

  • Colbert Takes On Ridiculous Restrictions Over Talking About The Olympics

    On last night’s Colbert Report, Stephen brought on his brother, Ed Colbert, an international copyright lawyer to discuss the totally ridiculous restrictions on what he can and cannot say concerning his Olympics coverage, to avoid getting sued by either NBC or the Olympics, leading Colbert to dub his reports the “Vancouverage of the quadrennial cold weather competition” to avoid saying things like Vancouver, Olympics or even winter games, as those are all on the forbidden list. Watch here (probably US only, tragically):

    The Colbert Report Mon – Thurs 11:30pm / 10:30c
    Vancouverage 2010 – Ed Colbert
    www.colbertnation.com
    Colbert Report Full Episodes Political Humor Skate Expectations


    Separately, if you watch the following segment on TV or online, I noticed that Comedy Central had to change the online coverage as compared to what was shown on TV last night. Last night, there were video clips from NBC’s coverage of the opening ceremonies. I don’t know if this was licensed or if Viacom/Comedy Central realized that those clips were fair use. But if you watch the online version, everywhere that Colbert showed a clip on the live version, there was, instead, a still photo — such as when he discusses the dancers from the opening ceremony and the lighting of the torch. I’m guessing that there’s some sort of licensing issue that explains why the online version of Colbert left those clips out, even though that seems ridiculous. Separately, if you look carefully in that same clip, you might catch a glimpse of occasional Techdirt contributor Blaise Alleyne who is seen laughing in the audience at one of Colbert’s jokes…

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story





  • Crystal Lake father arrested, charged with harming infant daughter

    A Crystal Lake man faces up to 30 years in prison after his arrest Monday on charges he caused serious injuries to his 3-month-old daughter on Christmas Day at the family home.

    Rajesh Chilakapati, 40, of the 7700 block of Crystal Springs Road, is charged with two counts of aggravated battery to a child and two counts of aggravated domestic battery stemming from an incident that police said left the girl with injuries to her head, eye and clavicle.

    Chilakapati is free after posting $10,000 bond Tuesday morning.

    “My client is innocent and we are going to vigorously defend against these charges,” his attorney, Mark Gummerson, later said.

    The arrest follows a nearly two-month investigation launched Dec. 28 when the Illinois Department of Children and Family Services contacted McHenry County Sheriff’s police about the child’s injuries. Investigators, who worked with doctors at Children’s Memorial Hospital in Chicago and the University of Illinois College of Medicine in Rockford, determined that the girl was with her father when the injuries happened, Lt. Andrew Zinke said.

    “His version of how the injuries occurred doesn’t match up with the evidence,” he added. “The (medical) specialists found it implausible as well.”

    The girl does not appear to have suffered any permanent injuries as a result of the incident, Zinke said.

    Aggravated battery to a child is a Class X felony, punishable by a mandatory six to 30 years in prison. Aggravated domestic battery is a Class 2 felony, punishable by three to seven years in prison, or probation.

    Chilakapati is scheduled to appear court March 3.

    Read the original article on DailyHerald.com.

    Distributed via Chicago Press Release Services


  • Pulte wants to build residences at Arlington Market site

    Pulte Homes plans to build single-family homes and townhouses at the site of Arlington Market, which has been such a mess that neighbors’ complaints have been plentiful, and the village sued a previous developer.

    Plans for 66 townhouses instead of 110 condominiums in two buildings will go before the Design Commission for comment and before a committee of the Plan Commission Wednesday night.

    Eventually zoning changes would have to be approved by the Village Board after review by the Plan Commission. The total site is almost 15 acres.

    Pulte, which has a contract to purchase the residential portion of the property at Kensington Drive and Dryden Avenue, wants to build the townhouses on the north portion, said Bill Enright, deputy director of Planning and Community Development.

    The company also wants to build single-family homes, which were planned for the middle of the site, said Enright. Fifty-three homes were approved there.

    “The village is very excited,” said Enright. “Problems with the previous developer and the economy left the site in very poor shape. The village has been in court to get it cleaned up.”

    The village staff likes the townhouse designs and considers them consistent with the goals of the planned unit development originally approved for the site, he said.

    Mayor Arlene Mulder said this is a good sign that the economy is improving and that elected officials are looking forward to the review process and seeing more about Pulte’s plans.

    “We certainly are pleased in these economic times to have a large home builder approach this large site,” she said.

    This proposal does not involve the commercial part of the property along Kensington, where the east end is still unbuilt, said Enright.

    The project was proposed in 2003 and finally approved in August 2006. Most of the old shopping center was demolished in 2007, and the village filed suit last May against the previous owner with complaints including fencing and cleanup.

    The lawsuit in the Rolling Meadows branch of Cook County Circuit Court will have another hearing in April, said Robin Ward, assistant village attorney.

    “It depends on what the new owners do with the property,” said Ward. “The whole purpose of the prosecution was to get code compliance.”

    Read the original article on DailyHerald.com.

    Distributed via Chicago Press Release Services