Author: Carolina Rumuat

  • Indonesia: Bank bailout sparks political crisis

    The Bank Century bail out in Indonesia has become a national scandal which divided public opinion and the House of Representatives.

    The case involved two Indonesian economic reformers namely Minister of Finance Sri Mulyani Indrawati and the Vice President Boediono.

    In 2008 the Committee for Financial System Stability (KSSK) led by Sri Mulyani at that time took over Bank Century because of its negative financial status. Later on, the state-owned Deposit Insurance Agency (LPS) claimed 90 percent of Bank Century's share and injected 6.7 trillion rupiah or almost US$700 million in total by February 2009.

    Bank Century under PT Century Bank management was a small bank, but without the bailout, according to VP Boediono, the bank's collapse could jeapordize the country’s banking system. During that time, the financial crisis was spreading around the world.

    The special committee to investigate the Bank Century bailout (Pansus Century) is composed of people's representatives from 8 political parties. Their job is to probe those who were involved in approving the controversial bail out program.

    Blogger Patung wrote about the case:

    The scandal that has become known as “Centurygate” revolves around not only the massive drain on state funds involved, but questions of whether some depositors (such as tycoon Boedi Sampoerna) had preferential treatment or access to their funds after the bailout money had been injected, and whether some of the money was diverted and embezzled.

    Last Wednesday 325 Pansus Century members cast their votes at the House of Representatives to decide whether or not the bail out was necessary. Only 212 members of Congress belonging to three political parties, including the president's Democratic Party, voted in favor of the bailout. While the rest voted against and encouraged both VP and Minister of Finance to resign in order to be investigated.

    On Thursday, the President finally broke his silence. During his speech, he backed both VP and the Finance Minister saying that he regrets that the committee's long inquiry overlooked the precarious situation at the time when a quick decision-making is required to weather the global economic crisis.

    Twitterers sighed in relief following the much awaited speech, though some commented that the President's speech was much delayed.

    @tyasnotys: whtever u said,gw ttp ngrasa pidato SBY td tepat.he actually knows how to speak properly in this condition #pidatosby

    I think the speech is proper.

    @treespotter: Presiden SBY yg menunggu sekian lama utk menjelaskan kebijakannya – karena terpaksa merespon DPR – cuma buat rakyat bingung. #PidatoSBY

    President Yudhoyono waited so long to define his policy, forced to respond to the House of Representatives – in the end confusing the people.

    @treespotter: This would be a good speech by President SBY,if delivered 3 months ago. Meh. #PidatoSBY

    Unspun ponders if the speech was really timely:

    If SBY has any leadership qualities at all he would know that commanding the loyalty and trust of the most capable lieutenants like Sri Mulyani and Boediono is crucial to his Cabinet’s performance and how history would judge him.

    With people like Sri Mulyani and Boediono if you believe them then you need not micromanage, just run interference for them to do their jobs and, when they get into trouble, you run interference to get them out of the mess.

    SBY did nothing like that. Whe the Bank Century case began to mushroom he hid behind the excuse of non-interference and let them blow in the wind. It is only when the Pansus votes have been counted and SBY himself was personally out of danger that he finally comes out to provide some statement of support for the duo.

    For people like SBY his undoing will be the gradual abandonment of good people from his ship. Unspun’s sure that the only motivations keeping Sri Mulyani, Boediono and other smart ministers still in the cabinet is the prospect of being able to do something positive for the Nation; as opposed to working for a shmuck for a boss.

    Krisnov who blogged at Politikana stressed that the recommendation of the special committee should be honored and that the culprits should apologize and step down.

    SBY melupakan fakta, bahwa kebijakan bailout bank Century menimbulkan korban yaitu para nasabah yang kehilangan haknya. SBY juga melupakan fakta bahwa uang 6,7 T itu adalah kekayaan Negara.

    Kesalahan memang bukan kejahatan. Tetapi seorang pejabat negara selain dituntut untuk tidak melakukan kejahatan, tetapi juga dituntut untuk tidak melakukan kesalahan.

    Jika SBY, Boediono, dan Sri Mulyani masih punya rasa malu dan harga diri, semestinya malu juga ketika kebijakan yang dikeluarkannya terbukti tidak dapat diimplementasikan dengan benar dan malah disalahgunakan oleh orang lain untuk merugikan orang banyak. Memohon maaf dan mengundurkan diri adalah jalan seorang yang terhormat dan mulia.

    President Yudhoyono has forgotten the fact that Bank Century's bailout has victimized some, in which the bank customers who lost their rights. The president has also forgotten the fact that the IDR 6.7T belonged to the state.

    (It's true that) Mistake isn't a crime. But a state official is required not only to follow the laws and not to commit any crime but also to be correct and not to commit any mistake.

    If the President, Boediono and Sri Mulyani still have some shame and dignity, the should feel ashamed when the policy they created can't be applied correctly and ended up being misused by someone and ended up causing some damage. Apologize and resign are the respectable and noble ways.

    Indonesians are divided over the ‘Centurygate' issue. Anti government protests were launched in the country, some of which turned violent like the action in South Sulawesi capital of Makassar.

  • “SOS Internet Indonesia”

    Indonesian internet users are on the move to save the internet from “repressive” regulations crafted by the Ministry of Communication and Information (Depkominfo).

    Last February 11 the ministry website published a press release stating the agency's firm stance against the increasing cases of public misconduct on the Internet. It was also mentioned that the Minister of Communication and Information (Menkominfo), Tifatul Sembiring, wishes to regulate Internet Multimedia Content in the country.

    The draft [id] regulation suggests that Mr. Sembiring will appoint a group of 30 people who will join the Multimedia Content Screening team. The team's works will include the filing of reports on websites suspected of having “bad” content, verifying these reports, imposing fines, revoking permits, etc.

    The draft regulation is purportedly against pornography and gambling but it may also target social networking sites and other online media tools which are are seen as today's powerful tools in educating the public about free speech and freedom of expression, as well as advocating good governance and democracy.

    The “draconian” draft is being opposed by Mahfud MD, the head of the Constitutional Court, who claims that the regulation would be  considered as unconstitutional [id] because it violates press freedom.

    Speaking to Global Voices author, blogger and IT expert Enda Nasution said that the draft regulation doesn't reflect the people's interest.

    “Indonesia is currently the freest country in the region, when it comes to freedom of expression and we want to keep it that way…

    “Indonesia's Firewall is the last thing we want and need right now, we'll fight for an open and free internet. This draft is a half baked regulation and a remains from 2006 administration. Having it now is a
    reactive efforts and pointless. Indonesia need a more comprehensive and well thought law when it come to Internet”.

    SOS internet

    Picture on Facebook page

    Facebookers who opposed the draft pooled their opinion at SOS Internet Indonesia Facebook page. The page now has more than 9,000 members.

    Nurina Nurinaa:  peraturan ini dibuat hanya untuk melindungi beberapa pihak yang “ketakutan” terhadap masyarakat yang mulai ekspresif dan mulai melek internet.. kenapa nggak cabut aja semua layanan internet dan kita semua pake telepon benang biar makin semrawut sekalian… dikit-dikit haram, dikit-dikit dilarang.. benernya ini negara apa penjara sih? >.<

    This regulation was made to protect some individuals who are afraid of  the outspoken and Internet savvy public. Why don't they yank out the internet services and start to use again the string phone and mess everything all together. Everything's forbidden. Frankly.. is this a country or a jail?

    Budi Lesmana:  Pemerintah gak mau capek, RPM ini bukti dari malasnya pemerintah, dia gak mau capek2 ngurusin masyarakatnya satu2, makanya yg diincer content providernya.

    The government doesn't want to be bothered by things, this regulation is a proof of laziness of our government. They don't care about caring for the people, so they aim at content providers.

    Ancilla Irwan:  secara konsep, program internet sehat memang baik. namun sungguh, bila ditilik lebih dalam mengenai konten dari rancangan peraturan yang dimaksudkan, rasanya masih perlu deskripsi yang lebih jelas biar tidak sekedar menjadi ‘dirigen' untuk ‘mengatur suara'…

    In concept, the Internet Sehat (note: literally means Healthy Internet in bahasa Indonesia – Internet filtering movement initiated by the government) is a great program. But to be honest, a clearer description about content regulations is needed, so this regulation won't be seen as a “conductor” whose aim is to “adjust opinions”..

    Andreas Febry:  “…Rancangan Peraturan Menteri untuk membatasi konten multimedia bertentangan dengan ide besar untuk membangun masyarakat berbasis pengetahuan…” http://bit.ly/9DZrFR

    The ministerial regulation to filter multimedia content contradicts the grand idea to establish a knowledge-based society.

    Twitterers pool their opinions on #tolakrpmkonten (reject Ministerial Regulation draft on internet content).

    @kennedymuslim: Si Tiffie slm ini sok legowo thd kritik di Twitter, pdhl diem2 bkn RUU utk menjerat pengkritik. Main blkg

    All this time Tiffie (note: new nickname of Minister Tifatul Sembiring given by some netizens) pretends to be sincere in the face of Twitter criticisms, but discreetly he drafted a regulation to incriminate people who criticized him. Back stabber

    @vindoarga: pak @tifsembiring ,jangan ubah indonesia menjadi seperti iran atau china #tolakrpmkonten

    Mr. @tifsembiring, don't turn Indonesia into Iran or China

    @Irmanski: Digaji k duit pajak masi aja gatau diri! Bikin RUU bukannya mengakomodir malah mengkebiri! #tolakrpmkonten

    Your salary came from the taxes, yet you're over your head! Instead of drafting a regulation that accommodates (freedom), you castrated it!

    Concerned Indonesian netizens are encouraged to send an e-mail to the officials of the Ministry of Communication and IT before the regulation is endorsed on February 19.

  • Indonesia: Water buffalo banned in rallies

    President Yudhoyono of Indonesia was reelected with an overwhelming mandate last year, promising to focus on bureaucratic reforms and stricker fight against corruption, including the eradication of the Judicial Mafia on his first 100 days in office.

    His efforts were deemed insufficient and too slow by the people, and scholars [id] think that anti corruption efforts are lacking strategies and far from being well planed.

    End of January, a demonstration took place in Jakarta and several Indonesian big cities marking the first 100 days of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono's second term.

    During the rally in the capital, a group of youth calling themselves Pemuda Cinta Tanah Air (Youths Love Motherland [PECAT]) brought along a rented water buffalo attaching a big photo of the head of state on the beast's buttocks.

    A couple of days ago, the same group planned to stage a similar anti-government protest using the same rented water buffalo. Alas, they were halted by the police just outside the capital and the water buffalo, bearing the white painted name “SiBuYa” (perhaps coincidentally its has the same initial like the president) on its body, confiscated.

    “We don't know their real reason. They said (it) disturbs public order,” according Yosef Rizal, the protest coordinator, as quoted[id] by the local journal Kompas.

    Water buffalo is considered a gentle, hardworking, and noble animal to most agrarian Indonesians, except in Java.

    In Javanese culture, comparing someone with water buffalo is considered rude, an utter disrespect. “Sleeping like a buffalo” is to call a sleeping person who's lazy and doesn't care about his/her surroundings.

    To the Torajans [id], inhabitants of Sulawesi, water buffalo plays an important role in society. Besides being used to work the fields, water buffalo is also a currency (i.e: down payment, dowry, inheritance,etc.), and most importantly used as animal sacrifice in various traditional ceremonies.

    Asiatic Water Buffalo. Photo from the Flickr page of cskk

    Asiatic Water Buffalo. Photo from the Flickr page of cskk

    To most Indonesians, the buffalo is no different to other animals brought in as attribute to the demonstration last January.  However, since President Yudhoyono shared his personal feelings about the buffalo in front of a national governors conference, bloggers and twitterers started to discuss whether the action should be deemed inappropriate.

    According to Andy Syoekry Amal, who wrote a post on Kompasiana:

    Menurut hemat saya, pernyataan SBY tersebut juga patut dihargai. Betapapun SBY adalah presiden, sedangkan presiden adalah kepala negara sekaligus kepala pemerintahan. Sebagai kepala negara, Presiden adalah simbol resmi negara Indonesia di dunia. Kita tentu tidak ingin simbol resmi negara kita disamakan dengan kerbau. Karena jika demikian, maka kita sebagai rakyat Indonesia juga adalah kerbau, karena dipimpin oleh “presiden kerbau”.

    In my humble opinion, (president) SBY's statement need to be respected. He, however, is the president, the head of state and government. As the head of state, the president is the official symbol of the Indonesian state in the world. Of course we don't want our state leader to be liken to a a water buffalo. If he's indeed a water buffalo, than us the citizens are no different.

    Another blogger, who coincidentally named Andy said:

    kalau memang merasa tersinggung dengan yang dibawa para pendemo (ya si kerbau bertuliskan SiBuYa itu), ya perbaiki dong kinerjanya, jangan malah mellow, melankolis, dan sentimentil…

    If he really does feel offended by the protester (I mean, the water buffalo with the word “SiBuYa” written on it), he should fix his (leadership) performance instead of being mellow, melancholy and sentimental..

    Blogger Mas Abdi posted his opinion on Politikana:

    Secara pribadi saya ingin mengatakan bahwa masalah demo kerbau sebaiknya tidak usah ditanggapi secara serius oleh SBY, karena seperti telah saya katakan pada awal tulisan ini, bahwa demo kerbau itu tidak pernah diperhatikan serius oleh masyarakat, bahkan lebih dari itu masyarakat pun sudah melupakannya.

    Personally, I think the demonstrating water buffalo shouldn't be taken seriously by the president, because as I said on the paragraph above, it wasn't really taken seriously by the people, moreover, the people has already forgotten it.

    On his blog, Rinaldi Munir said that the protesters were lacking respect against a state symbol:

    Sebagai simbol negara, maka dia adalah representasi negara. Kalau Presiden pergi ke luar negeri maka, dia mewakili negara yang besar ini. Apa yang diucapkan oleh Presiden adakah pernyataan resmi yang mewakili negara. Jadi, pelecehan terhadap SBY dengan menyamakannya sebagai kerbau tentu adalah pelecehan terhadap negara itu sendiri.

    Saya melihat para demonstran itu tidak mengerti etika berdemonstrasi. Mereka lebih banyak mengandalkan emosi kebencian ketimbang berdemonstasi secara cerdas dan santun.

    As a state symbol, he represents the country. If he goes abroad then he's representing this great nation. What he said officially represents the state. So disgracing him by comparing him to a water buffalo automatically means disgracing the state itself.

    All I'm seeing are protesters who don't know the ethics when they're demonstrating. They rely on animosity instead of protesting in a smart and decent (ways).

    Rinaldi also adds that despite so, the president should keep it cool:

    Seharusnya SBY bersikap tenang, tidak reaktif, dan tidak merasa panik karena adanya wacana pemakzulan dirinya akhir-akhir ini

    […]

    Biasa sajalah, tenang man, senyum dong, toh rakyat bisa menilai sendiri siapa ingin memakan siapa. Apa yang terjadi di gedung parlemen dan di istana negara adalah panggung drama yang disaksikan oleh jutaan rakyat. Pada akhirnya rakyat sendiri yang menyimpulkan dan menilai setiap aksi pelaku peran di panggung itu.

    SBY (Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono) should remain calm, not too reactive, or panic because of the recent impeachment rumor.

    […]

    Take it easy, relax man, smile if you will, the people can judge by themselves who the backstabbers are. The parliament building and the state palace are the drama stages watched by millions of people. By the end of the day the people will conclude and assess each act of the actors on those stage.

    Most twitterers said that Yudhoyono was too quick to complain, instead of dealing with many overwhelming issues in the country. However, some of them also sympathize with Yudhoyono.

    adityainsani: Again, President Yudhoyono complaining and acting like an uneducated boy, how can you lead this country sir??

    aiiuntari: presiden dapat berkomentar soal kerbau, namun tutup mulut ketika diminta pendapat tentang wakil-nya yang tidak punya etika

    the president would comment about water buffalo, but keep his silence when asked about his unethical VP.

    fauzanhamdi: kebebasan berekspresi disalahgunakan menjadi kebebasan menghujat/menghina. (tentang si kerbau)

    A misuse of the freedom of expression by turning it into freedom of condemning/insulting. (I'm talking about the water buffalo)

    Over night, the water buffalo named by student protesters became a popular icon of democracy. In other Indonesian cities, however, the police are still confiscating the animal brought by protesters.

    ruliharahap: Police Detain Student Protesters and a Buffalo as Yudhoyono Arrives In Palembang http://ow.ly/15lX3 | See BeYe (note: Yudhoyono)? This is your own doing