Author: Chris Morran

  • JetBlue & American Trade Landing Rights To Expand Routes

    American Airlines announced a deal with JetBlue today that would significantly increase their presence at JFK Airport in New York. Meanwhile, JetBlue will now have the ability to offer service to and from Washington D.C.’s Reagan National Airport.

    The two airlines have agreed to swap landing rights at these airports, with American getting 12 slot pairs in New York from JetBlue. In turn, American hands over 8 slot pairs at Reagan (along with an additional pair at White Plains, NY) to the discount airline.

    The goal for American is to provide more connection options for their international flights at JFK and Boston. The airline says these additional slots will allow them to add seven new destinations to JFK.

    The airport is a hub for American’s biggest competitor, Delta, who have doubled service to the airport in the last five years.

    American Air Targets Delta in NYC With JetBlue Accord [BusinessWeek]

  • Job Cuts Continue, Despite Expected Gains

    Once again, the private sector continued to shed jobs this month. But in an attempt to look on the not-so-bleak side of things, it was the smallest monthly decline in over two years.

    According to a study by payroll powerhouse Automatic Data Processing (you probably know them as ADP — you might remember their logo on your paychecks from when you had a job), 23,000 jobs were lost in the private sector in March.

    Prognosticators had actually expected to see an of 40,000 jobs for March. That more positive number may be reflected when the federal government releases its jobs report, which will include the massive amount of temporary hires for the 2010, later this week.

    “American businesses are on the cusp of recovery,” says Gary Butler of ADP. “Yet this report shows that they remain hesitant to increase their payrolls.”

    Some areas of employment are actually hiring right now, says the report. For the second month in a row, ADP saw an increase in service jobs. The 28,000 new hires in March was the highest number for service jobs since March 2008.

    On the down side, a total of 60,000 jobs were lost in goods-producing and manufacturing.

    Private sector continues to shed jobs [CNN]

  • Report: AT&T Beefing Up Network To Prep For iPhone Battle

    Following up on yesterday’s news that Apple is preparing to start production on Verizon-compatible iPhones, the Wall Street Journal now says that AT&T has been working since December to improve their existing networks to remain competitive when the inevitable battle for iPhone market share begins.

    Even before the iPhone, AT&T’s mobile network has always been criticized for its poor coverage in major cities. (As both an AT&T subscriber and a New York City resident, I can attest to this firsthand.) The Journal story claims that the company launched a 100-day plan in late 2009 to begin to remedy this problem — adding new network spectrum, repositioning towers and improving the connection speed on cell towers.

    AT&T has already said that they plan on spending $2 billion more in 2010 on network improvements than they did in 2009.

    What remains to be seen is if Verizon (and potentially others), who have not had to handle the high-amount of data devouring done by iPhone users, will be able to keep up with customer demand or if they’ll experience the same growing pains as AT&T has in recent years.

    AT&T Prepares Network For Battle [WSJ]

  • The Grease Blotter: Today In Fast Food Related Crime

    For whatever reason, fast food joints seem to be a target for crimes of all sorts. Ranging from outlandish to horrific, we’ll occasionally bring you The Grease Blotter, a round-up of the latest in crimes involving fast food chains.

    Pizza Hut: Employee at Valdosta, GA, Pizza Hut shot during robbery, takes himself to the hospital. [Valdosta Daily Times]

    Starbucks: Drunk driver in Frisco, TX, decides to give his local Starbucks a drive-thru window, by driving his car through the window. [NBCDFW.com]

    KFC: Three teens arrested in Grand Cayman for robbing a KFC… with a machete. [News 27]

    Taco Bell: Miami Dolphin-turned-Arizona Cardinal Joey Porter nailed for a DUI in the parking lot of a Bakersfield, CA, Taco Bell. [NBC Miami]

    Burger King: A woman in Southampton, UK, says she was sexually assaulted in the handicap stall of a Burger King. [BBC]

    If you hear of any fast food-related crimes in your neck of the woods, send ’em to the Consumerist Tip Line.

  • Lawsuit Seeks To Stop Import Of iPads & Other Apple Products

    Less than a month after Apple filed a lawsuit against phone maker HTC over allegations of patent infringement related to Apple’s iPhone/iPod Touch/iPad devices, the computer company finds itself the target of a similar lawsuit by a a Taiwanese company that claims Apple is using their touch-screen patents without permission.

    In their complaint filed with the Internatioanl Trade Commission earlier today, Elan Microelectronics alleges that the touch screens on several Apple products violates an Elan patent covering “touch-sensitive input devices with the ability to detect the simultaneous presence of two or more fingers.”

    This essentially takes issue with the technology used in Apple products that allows users to use two fingers for zooming in and out, and navigating the screen. So the lawsuit includes not just the iPhone, iPod Touch and iPad, but also the MacBook and Magic Mouse.

    Elan has asked the commission to prevent the import of all of these items into the U.S.

    “We have taken the step of filing the ITC complaint as a continuation of our efforts to enforce our patent rights against Apple’s ongoing infringement. A proceeding in the ITC offers a quick and effective way for Elan to enforce its patent,” reads a statement from Elan regarding the suit.

    Even if Elan is successful in banning imports of iPads, that won’t have any effect on the first batch of the tablet-ish thingamabob. Those have long since landed stateside and some have already begun shipping out to those who pre-ordered early.

    Apple sued over multitouch patent [cnet]

  • Facebook Really Wants You To Identify Your Favorite Brands

    If you’ve used Facebook for more than 30 seconds in the last couple of years, you’ve no doubt been asked to be a “fan” of a movie, a food product or maybe your favorite consumer news site. But, apparently that didn’t work well enough for the companies that invest millions in marketing on Facebook, because the whole “fan” thing will soon be replaced with the more popular “like” option.

    “Liking” has been a feature on the site that allows users to show their approval for their friends’ posts, photos, comments, etc. And now Facebook is hoping to extend the success of that feature to brands.

    While it’s free to create a company Facebook page that people have been able to become “fans” of, the social networking behemoth makes their money from the ad units companies can place on their pages.

    Facebook says that, on average, users are currently becoming “fans” at a rate of 4 pages/month. And now they’re betting that choosing to “like” a brand will be a more appealing choice than declaring that you’re a fan and that more people will choose to associate themselves with brands on Facebook.

    In the past, Facebook has made major changes like this in the name of improving the user experience. But this latest move seems calculated merely to squeeze brand association out of users who had previously resisted. Thoughts?

    Facebook to Scrap `Become a Fan Of’ for `Like’ [ABC News]

  • Introducing My Downfall: The Bacon Donut

    Perhaps taking advantage of the whole bacon = cocaine thing, a restaurant in New York has unleashed what may simultaneously be the worst and best idea in the history of food: bacon donuts.

    Yes, two of the essential food groups have been combined into a dessert at NYC’s Wildwood BBQ, where last Friday Chef “Big Lou” Elrose added a new offering — glazed cinnamon donuts bedazzled (bacon-dazzled?) with bits of candied bacon.

    In the interest of science, I intend on testing these thoroughly before declaring yea or nay.

    AlwaysInformed: Bacon Donuts Now at Wildwood BBQ [Always Hungry via Gothamist]

  • VIDEO: Why You Should Never Pay Full Price For A Mattress

    Of all the high-ticket prices available for your home, one that our bookish cousin Consumer Reports won’t rate is your mattress, because everyone’s particular mattress needs are subjective. But that doesn’t mean CR won’t investigate whether or not customers are getting their money’s worth when they spring for their mattresses.

    Consumer Reports dissected 11 spring mattresses and found that “they’re pretty much constructed the same,” and that the extra money is going mostly to more padding and nicer materials. “But to most people, you probably can’t tell.”

    Because your sleep needs are so personal, CR advises you to never order your mattress online or over the phone.

    Also, says CR, you shouldn’t be paying anywhere near full price for your mattress. In fact, they advise on not paying anything over 50% of the original selling price. So wait for sales and continue to haggle even then, because the mark-up on mattresses is huge.

    Getting the Right Mattress [Consumer Reports]

  • Someone Actually Wanted To Book A Vacation At Schrute Farms

    The folks at travel site TripAdvisor.com recently had to put a warning on their listing for Schrute Farms, the “number one beet-related agrotourism destination in Northeastern Pennsylvania,” not because of bad reviews or because the innkeepers would regale them with detailed descriptions of the various bears found in the region. No, it’s because Schrute Farms only exists in the magical world of TV.

    If you’re unfamiliar with NBC’s The Office, it might explain why you’d never heard of Schrute Farms, operated by Dwight K. Schrute, Assistant to the Regional Manager of Dunder-Mifflin Scranton.

    The family farm/inn has been mentioned on several episodes of the show. In one particular episode, they wanted to show a TripAdvisor listing for the farm so they got some cooperation from the folks at the site, who were happy for the national exposure.

    “We don’t have a big marketing budget and don’t do TV ads,” a TripAdvisor exec tells the NY Times. “This was the big time.”

    Even after the show premiered, TripAdvisor decided to keep the listing live out of a combination of LOL and marketing savvy. As of this moment, Schrute Farms has 693 reviews and counting, with an overall rating of 81% positive.

    But if you go to the listing, you’ll notice immediately in the top-right corner a box reading:
    “Message from TripAdvisor: As seen on NBC’s The Office. Have fun reading these reviews – go on, add your own! Just don’t try to book a visit here, because this fictional place doesn’t really exist.”

    The site’s chief marketing officer said this needed to be added to the listing because “We had a complaint from someone who had wanted to go there.”

    We’re guessing that complaint might have come from a tall, shaggy-haired guy named Jim…

    For a B&B That Doesn’t Exist, the Online Reviews Keep Coming [NY Times]

    TripAdvisor listing for Schrute Farms

  • Why Won’t USPS Let Me File This Complaint?

    Usually when we reprint a customer complaint, it’s because the complaint itself deserves public attention. But the reason we’re posting Consumerist reader Sarah’s letter to the USPS isn’t because the world needs to know about her smashed up shipment, but because the USPS’ website won’t let her file the complaint.

    According to Sarah, she attempted to file the below note using USPS.com’s complaint form, but was told it could not be accepted because it contains a prohibited word. But neither she nor we can figure out what that word may be.

    She thinks it might be “bloody,” I think it might be her use of emoticons. Is there anyone out there familiar with this kind of filtering that might be able to advise?

    Hi there!

    I recently returned from a trip to Boston for St. Patrick’s Day. Having lost my job a month back, and being a 29-year-old who lives with her parents, it was a very necessary and enjoyable break from my life. Part of that was buying a few gifts for my family – one of those gifts being a bottle of bloody mary mix from Cheers for my pops. We enjoy a morning cocktail just as much as the next guy or gal 🙂

    Having only taken a carry-on on my flight, I opted to mail back the extra things that weren’t immediately necessary at home: my hair dryer, a new pair of shoes, my suede boots , the ridiculously expensive hair stuff I got from the Lush store, and the Mary mix. The hair stuff was individually wrapped in Ziplocs, and the Mary mix was triple wrapped with bubble wrap. Additionally, the box was stamped at least twice with the word ‘fragile.’

    I chose USPS because you guys have ALWAYS done a beautiful job of shipping anything I’ve needed shipped, quickly and with no problem. So I wasn’t concerned with this shipment either.

    Unfortunately, the box arrived yesterday in not such great shape. My awesome mailman came walking up with it (I was so excited!), and as soon as my mom grabbed it she said, ‘This is wet.’ My heart sank.

    Sure enough, the box was all mushed around and the bottle of bloody mary mix had broken. What in the world?? Of course it leaked onto my suede boots. I now have no idea what a delicious Cheers Bloody Mary tastes like – guess I could lick my boots. Oh, perhaps I could try and turn my hair dryer on and see if I can shoot some into my mouth? I mean, it did soak plenty of it up. But then I fear I’d mess up my hair! Thank goodness my Lush shampoo is safe.

    As you can see, I’ve lightened up, but yesterday I was incredibly upset. I’d filled out two new applications and sent off another resume, got a no on both apps and of course will never hear back from the job I sent my resume to, and THEN my awesome stuff from Boston showed up not awesome. Broken, actually. I was steamed.

    So, my suggestion is, please stop throwing boxes with such wrath and anger. Maybe if a person loading a truck has a problem with his or her boss, sit the two of ’em down for a beer summit. I’d say a bloody mary summit but I think we know now what kind of reaction that’ll elicit.

    Thanks for your attention, have a lovely day! 🙂

  • 4 Myths About Tipping From A Former Pizza Delivery Guy

    When we posted a simple poll about tipping delivery drivers, we had no idea it would garner the kind of mammoth response it did, with folks on both sides of the tipping divide ardently defending their position. In an effort to clear up what he sees as common misconceptions about tipping, Consumerist reader and former delivery guy Justin wrote in to take a sledgehammer to a handful of “myths” about his past profession.

    Here’s Justin’s list:

    #1) The delivery fee goes to the driver to make up for a lack of tips. So any additional tip is optional
    FALSE. The delivery fee is constant from chain to chain, but rarely does the entire fee go to the driver. Usually the business itself takes the fee in order to cover driver expenses, such as paying for a portion of their gas, or other related expenses specific to the delivery driver position itself (insurance, etc). Sometimes, the business may split the fee with the driver, and some smaller chains may give the driver the entirety of the fee to supplement pay. However, the delivery fee is just that at the end of the day: a fee for delivery to your home. It is NOT a tip, and should never be assumed to be one.

    #2) Delivery drivers make more than the kitchen staff, so tips aren’t necessary
    FALSE.
    In fact, because drivers have the ability to make tips, their pay is usually substantially lower than other staff members. The ability to make tips results in a much lower minimum wage by Federal Standards, to the tune of $2.13 an hour for tipped employees, versus $7.25 an hour for non-tip employees (this is also why retail employees cannot accept tips!). The employer must make up the difference if the monthly tips plus wage do not meet the minimum wage of $7.25 an hour, hence the various fees tacked onto delivery runs, though even then the kitchen staff tends to make much more than minimum wage. At my place of employment, drivers got paid $8.25/hr plus tips due to municipality laws, though kitchen staff still made $15 to $20 an hour!

    #3) If the driver is late, I’m not obligated to tip.
    FALSE-ISH. You are never obligated to tip; nobody is twisting your arm until you pay up, after all. However, many customers use this excuse religiously during busy times, like lunch rush and weekend nights in order to get cheaper food. If you want the truth, however, customers who don’t tip are always bumped to the bottom of the delivery list. So if your food arrives cold consistently, maybe you should check and see if you have been tipping the driver; if not, that’s probably why!

    #4) The driver just has to grab orders, deliver them, and collect the cash. It’s hardly a job worth a tip.
    FALSE.
    Drivers are the grunts of the store, and do every job inside it. We clean the store at opening, fold boxes, make orders, take orders, box orders, proof the dough, make the wings, mix the sauce, load the freezers, cut the dough, unload the truck, balance the register, clean the counters, mop the floors, wash the windows, empty the trash, and get everything ready for the next day. In fact, drivers are the last employees to leave behind the manager on duty, and the first to arrive to help with the daily chores. Combine that with low pay and the fact we still deliver your food, and we work harder than anyone else in that store sometimes.

    ——————

    What do you think of Justin’s list? Would you be in favor of paying more for a product if you didn’t have to tip?

  • Report: iPhones For Verizon, Sprint Coming As Early As September

    It’s been rumored for months that Apple iPhones would soon be able to be used on U.S. mobile networks other than AT&T, and a new report says the company is finally set to begin mass production on the phones as early as September.

    Current iPhones use GSM wireless technology exclusively, but the Wall Street Journal, citing sources that have been briefed by Apple on the situation, reports that the company plans to begin manufacturing a version that would run on the CDMA networks used by Verizon and Sprint.

    If this is true, that would most likely mean the end of AT&T’s nearly 3-year stateside monopoly on iPhone service. Not surprisingly, AT&T pish-poshes the WSJ report:

    Even if these CDMA phones are not made immediately available in the U.S., you can expect some Sprint and Verizon users will attempt to jailbreak foreign CDMA iPhones, allowing them to run on their networks.

    “There has been lots of incorrect speculation on CDMA iPhones for a long time,” said an AT&T mouthpiece. “We haven’t seen one yet and only Apple knows when that might occur.”

    In addition to news of CDMA iPhones, the Journal says Apple will be releasing yet another slimmed-down, faster version of the existing GSM iPhone.

    New iPhone Could End AT&T’s U.S. Monopoly [WSJ]

  • Burger King Challenges McMuffin With New Breakfast Sandwich

    For decades, the fast food muffin sandwich market has been dominated by McDonald’s. But yesterday, Burger King launched a full-on attack on the McMuffin with the launch of their new Breakfast Muffin.

    BK’s offering is essentially the same as the Sausage McMuffin, featuring sausage, egg and cheese on an English muffin. It will be featured on the fast food giant’s breakfast value menu, which means it’ll cost you $1 in most places.

    “The BK Breakfast Muffin sandwich provides more value for the money to our guests,” said a company bigwig. “We took a breakfast sandwich that has proven likeability among consumers and are delivering it at a great price.”

    Another new breakfast item at Burger King is the Breakfast Bowl. It combines roasted potatoes, grilled onions and peppers, scrambled eggs and sausage, and cheese, for the price of $2.79.

    Question is: Can BK compete with the McMuffin? And should McDonald’s strike back with a McCroissandwich?

    Burger King adds to breakfast menu [South Florida Business Journal]

  • Treasury Dept. Selling Its 7.7 Billion Shares Of Citigroup For Big Profit

    The Treasury Dept. announced today that it plans to sell off all of the 7.7 billion shares of Citigroup it acquired as part of the bailout of the bank. This could mean a profit of upwards of $8 billion for the federal government in just a few months.

    Citigroup had received a total of $45 billion in bailout money from the government. Last fall, $25 billion of that was converted to common stock at a price of $3.25/share. As of this morning, those shares were trading for $4.22/share.

    Of course, the Treasury isn’t going to dump its entire 27% stake in Citi in one fell swoop. In a release on their website, the Treasury Dept. writes:

    Treasury intends to sell its Citigroup common shares into the market through various means in an orderly and measured fashion. Treasury intends to initiate its disposition of the common shares pursuant to a pre-arranged written trading plan. The manner, amount and timing of the sales under the plan is dependent upon a number of factors.

    Unless the Citigroup stock crashes in the months before the Treasury completes the sale, this will be the government’s most profitable return of bailout money. So far, the government has earned around $13.7 in interest and dividend payments related to the bailout.

    U.S. Treasury Plans to Sell Citigroup Stake in 2010 [BusinessWeek]

  • Not Signing Your Name & 9 Other Common Tax-Filing Mistakes

    It would be generous to describe tax forms as daunting. Even the 1040-EZ looks significantly more complicated than it actually is. And, while you’re worrying about exemptions and deductions, you might forget to do something as simple as sign your name. That’s why the folks at USA Today put together this list of 10 common mistakes you should be aware of when filing.

    1. Incorrect Social Security numbers:
    -Get the SSN wrong or omit it for any of your dependents and the IRS might disallow the exemption, which could mean a significant amount of money. Also, if you got married and changed your name, make sure you notify the Social Security Administration before you file your taxes.

    2. Incorrect bank account information:
    This should be filed under “triple/quadruple check before filing.” If you’re requesting direct deposit on your return, one incorrect number in the account or routing number could wreak havoc on you getting your return.

    3. Overlooking charitable contributions:
    Go through credit card and bank statements to make sure you’ve listed all charitable donations for the year. And if you made a contribution to earthquake relief in Haiti between Jan. 12 and Feb. 28 of 2010, you can include that deduction on this year’s taxes.

    4. Missing deductions on tax breaks:
    Even if you claim the standard deduction, you could be eligible for these tax breaks–

    •Taxes on the purchase of a new car. You can deduct state and local taxes paid for a new vehicle purchased after Feb. 16, 2009, and before Jan. 1, 2010. You can deduct taxes on up to $49,500 of the purchase.

    •State and local property taxes. This tax break primarily helps homeowners who have paid off their homes or don’t have enough mortgage interest to itemize. You can increase your standard deduction by up to $500, or $1,000 if you’re married, to cover your property taxes. This deduction isn’t limited to your residence.

    5. Missing the Making Work Pay credit:
    If you received the $400 or $800 Making Work Pay credit last year, you will still need to claim the credit. Otherwise, your refund could be delayed.

    6. Not reporting the stimulus payment:
    As part of last year’s stimulus package, Social Security beneficiaries received a $250 one-time Economic Recovery Payment. This payment isn’t taxable. However, if you had earned income last year, you may have also received a Making Work Pay credit. In that case, you’re supposed to reduce your credit by the amount of your recovery payment. Failure to do this could delay your refund.

    7. Misunderstanding medical expenses:
    You can only deduct the the amount of unreimbursed medical expenses that exceeds 7.5% of your adjusted gross income. So, for example, if your adjusted gross income comes out to $50K, you can only begin deducting unreimbursed medical expenses after they total at least $3,750. But it might be worth looking at, considering the high cost of… well, everything. Eligible expenses include deductibles, co-payments, unreimbursed dental costs, eyeglasses and transportation costs (ex: mileage and parking when you go to the doctor).

    8. Paying unemployment benefits taxes:
    For 2009, up to $2,400 in unemployment benefits are tax-free, so you’ll need to subtract that amount from your total benefits when calculating your taxable income.

    9. Thinking you’re late for 2009 savings:
    “If you qualify, you can still make a deductible contribution to your 2009 individual retirement account. Eligible taxpayers can reduce their 2009 taxable income by up to $5,000, or $6,000 if they’re 50 or older. The deadline for 2009 IRA contributions is April 15.

    “For 2009, workers who are covered by an employer-provided 401(k) plan or pension must have modified adjusted gross income of $55,000 or less to deduct the full IRA contribution. Those with MAGI of between $55,000 and $65,000 can deduct a reduced amount. If your MAGI exceeds $65,000, and you’re covered by a retirement plan, you can’t deduct your IRA contribution. For married couples who are covered by a retirement plan at work, the deduction phases out between $89,000 and $109,000.

    “If you’re not covered by a retirement plan at work, you can deduct the full contribution, as long as you earned at least the amount of your contribution. The same goes for married couples when neither spouse is covered by a retirement plan. If your spouse is covered by a retirement plan but you’re not, you can deduct a full contribution to your IRA as long as your combined MAGI is $166,000 or less. If your MAGI is between $166,000 and $176,000, you can deduct a partial contribution.”

    10. Forgetting to sign your return:
    The IRS says an unsigned return is invalid. Remember: If your return was prepared by someone else, you’re still required to sign it, as should the preparer.

    What are some mistakes you’ve made? What do you always find confusing on the tax forms every year?

    Rushing to do taxes? Avoid these 10 last-minute mistakes [USA Today]

  • Ford Agrees To Sell Volvo For $1.8 Billion To Zhejiang Geely

    They always say that cars are the worst investment, since they almost always depreciate in value. But Ford Motor Co. learned the hard way that this holds true for car companies as well. They bought Volvo for $6.45 billion in 1999, only to sell it 11 years later for $1.8 billion.

    The Detroit automaker reached a deal over the weekend to sell their Swedish brand of vehicles to Chinese car manufacturer Zhejiang Geely Holding Group Co.

    “We needed to find a new owner that would take the Volvo Cars business forward while also cherishing its unique Swedish brand values,” said Ford CFO Lewis Booth. “I am very pleased to say that we believe we have found such an owner in Geely.”

    Geely’s chairman, Li Shufu, says he wants to protect the value of the Volvo brand. “Throughout our negotiations with Ford and Volvo Cars management, I have emphasized the special care with which we will manage and build this asset,” he said at the signing ceremony at the Volvo offices in Goteborg, Sweden. “I want to emphasize that Volvo is Volvo and Geely is Geely. Volvo will be run by Volvo management. It will have the strategic independence to develop its business plan, and we are determined to preserve the distinct identity of the Volvo brand.”

    While Volvo will continue producing cars at their plants in Sweden and Belgium, Geely plans to produce Volvos in China.

    Volvo is just the latest foreign luxury brand to be sold off by Ford, joining Aston Martin, Jaguar and Land Rover.

    Ford, Geely agree to $1.8B Volvo deal [Detroit News]

  • Apple Moves Ship Date For Some iPads To April 12

    We guess early birds truly do get the worm. Or at least they get to be the first ones to get their hands on their biggie-sized iPod Touches. Apple announced over the weekend that they’ve sold out of their first run of iPads and some folks won’t be getting their pre-ordered tablet thingies until after April 12, a full 9 days after the initial release date.

    Apple had initially promised an April 3 date for pre-orders, but they recently moved that to April 12 as — at least according to them, since they won’t release actual pre-order figures — demand outstripped inventory.

    Apple says that if you ordered earlier this month, you’ll still be have your ready-for-framing iPad on time.

    Latest iPad orders won’t ship until April 12 [Reuters]

  • Is It Ever Okay To Not Tip The Pizza Guy?

    Consumerist reader Chris (no, it wasn’t me) wrote to us hoping to get a resolution to a pizza delivery dilemma he recently faced. Because he’s outside their delivery area, he went to pick up his order from his favorite pizzeria. But when he got home, he found out they’d given him the wrong pizza.

    When he called the pizza place up and told them what had happened, they were very polite and said they were sending out a delivery driver with a replacement pizza, even though he was outside their delivery area.

    We’ll let Chris explain the quandary he faced next:

    But now I was stuck with a dilemma about the delivery. Should I tip the delivery guy for a pizza that I already had to go pick up once? My wallet tells me no, since it was their mistake. But my conscience tells me yes, because the driver isn’t the one who made the mistake and that’s how he makes his money.

    In the end, Chris decided to tip the driver but he wanted to find out what other people would have done. Voice your opinion in the poll and use the comments to let us know in what situations — if any — you feel it’s okay to not tip the driver.


  • Lawyers Begin Scrambling For Position In Toyota Lawsuits

    More than 100 lawyers from all around the country packed into a San Diego courtroom yesterday in an attempt to stake their claim to the lion’s share of any settlements that come from the multitude of federal lawsuits filed against Toyota in recent weeks.

    Since Toyota announced the recall of more than 8 million vehicles, around 140 lawsuits have been filed in federal courts. But as those suits become consolidated and streamlined, it becomes increasingly important — at least to the plaintiffs’ lawyers — just where those cases will be heard.

    Attorneys based in whichever of the 19 judicial jurisdictions gets the case stand a better chance of being selected to lead the litigation, and therefore stand to earn some major money.

    Thus, you get the zoo that appeared before the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation yesterday. To make things move along as quickly as possible, each district had to decide which attorney or attorneys would plead their case during the allotted two minutes before the panel.

    It was a scene the Wall Street Journal likened to speed-dating:

    One attorney argued for a Wyoming court setting, telling the [panel] how quickly cases move through the system there. Another sung the praises of a Louisiana judge who managed to keep cases moving along even as Hurricane Katrina barreled down. A third pitched for California, where Toyota’s U.S. headquarters is based, saying it was the “center of gravity” of the cases.

    A lawyer representing Toyota was on hand to tell that the car giant would like to A) see the cases consolidated into as few as possible and B) would prefer to have the cases heard in the Central District of California, both because it’s near the company’s U.S. HQ in Torrance and because the state’s relative proximity to Japan would make it easier for any witnesses traveling to and from the company’s global headquarters.

    The panel is expected to make its decision public in 2-6 weeks.

    Lawyers Play Speed-Date in Toyota Suit Tussle [WSJ]

  • POLL: Should Tanning Beds Require Parental Consent?

    Yesterday, a Food & Drug Administration advisory panel suggested that the FDA begin making it a requirement for children and teenagers who want to get a golden glow from a tanning bed that they must first obtain parental consent on a form documenting that the parents are aware of the potential hazards of tanning. Since I get my sun the natural way — from the backlit screen of my laptop — I’d like to know from y’all whether you think this is a sensible idea that will help prevent skin disease and cancer in the long run or if it’s just more mandated mollycoddling…