Author: Dana Sherne

  • China hacks student e-mails

    The Gmail account of Tenzin Seldon ‘12, a regional coordinator of New York-based Students for a Free Tibet, was spied on by a third party in China. The repeated infiltrations reported by other businesses have led Google to move toward ending its business operations there. (Courtesy of Tenzin Seldon)

    The Gmail account of Tenzin Seldon ‘12, a regional coordinator of New York-based Students for a Free Tibet, was spied on by a third party in China. The repeated infiltrations reported by other businesses have led Google to move toward ending its business operations there. (Courtesy of Tenzin Seldon)

    When Tenzin Seldon ‘12 logged into her Gmail account from New York over winter break, she had no idea that someone else was also logged into her account — from China. Nor did she know that she had become part of Google’s investigation into a suspected widespread cyber-attack program potentially centralized across the Pacific.

    Seldon, a regional coordinator of New York-based Students for a Free Tibet, is one of dozens of human rights activists whose Gmail account had been spied on by a third party in China, according to a Jan. 12 statement from Google. But only two Gmail accounts were accessed by hackers.

    “If they’re willing to put so much of their resources into monitoring a 20-year-old like me from Stanford, who’s an activist, that means I’m really doing my job,” Seldon said. “I’m being an activist for those people who need their voices to be amplified.”

    On Jan. 7, University officials contacted Seldon to inform her that her private Gmail account had been hacked, Seldon said. The official, whose confidentiality Seldon chose to protect, directed her to contact David Drummond, senior vice president and chief legal officer at Google.

    “He immediately told me that my e-mail had been compromised,” Seldon said. “They knew for a fact that it was someone in China because they could trace the I.P. address.”

    Martin Lev, Google’s director of security and safety, came to her dorm to pick up her laptop and test it for malware later that evening, she said. Two days later, Seldon was informed that her computer contained no malware or viruses, a surprising fact given that private information, like Seldon’s password, is usually accessed through spyware placed on the user computer.

    “This meant that someone from China actually had access to my password,” Seldon said.

    Online accounts are commonly compromised when users have an easily guessed password, use the same password on multiple computer accounts, or use a kiosk-style computer, according to Matthew Ricks, executive director of the division of IT services that includes Stanford’s e-mail services.

    Seldon, however, has the caution of someone with years of experience as a Tibetan activist. She was born and raised in Dharamsala, India, where the Tibetan government in exile is located. Her parents took asylum there after fleeing Tibet on foot, she said.

    Seldon has been active in Students for a Free Tibet since high school. Over the years, she has seen the organization’s Web sites and blogs defaced with “F*** Tibet” by hackers. Seldon said she has even received death threats in the past.

    During the March 2008 demonstrations in Tibet, pro-Tibet human rights organizations saw a “dramatic increase in cyber attacks,” according to Kate Woznow, deputy director of Students for a Free Tibet. False e-mails were sent in the name of group members, and cell and office phones were jammed.

    During the Olympics Games in Beijing later that year, cyber attacks continued. Tenzing Tethong, a visiting Tibetan scholar at Stanford, said that during that time his e-mail contacts were somehow accessed and his acquaintances received e-mails from an account in his name. Tethong also uses Gmail and to his knowledge, his e-mail has not been hacked.

    Woznow recalls that an online security contractor told her they had never seen that number or type of attack before, adding that it clearly was an organized, concerted attempt to gather information and decrease the group’s efficiency.

    The attack on Seldon’s Gmail account is different than previous cyber attacks, Woznow said.

    “What’s really unique about Seldon’s case is that . . . they couldn’t find any malware, so this is a new level, a new wave of these kinds of cyber attacks,” she said. “And the fact that Google users were targeted makes this pretty unique because Google prides itself on security.”

    A source from Google familiar with the investigation, who spoke on the condition of anonymity, confirmed Seldon’s account. The Google source believed Seldon was a victim of a sophisticated malware that erases itself from the computer’s hard drive after accessing passwords and information. Google was not able to comment further on other victims of hacking due to the ongoing investigation.

    Google announced on Jan. 12 that it was considering ending its business operations and filtering in China. According to Google, at least 20 other companies covering a wide range of businesses have also been targets of cyber attacks and surveillance. These other companies, including Yahoo! and Adobe, have not said they will end business relations with China.

    “The environment in which we’re operating in terms of China is not getting better,” the Google source said. “So, we’re no longer comfortable filtering search results.”

    President John Hennessy, who sits on Google’s board of directors, said in an e-mail to The Daily that “the Google decision was a difficult one for the company, but in the end, the company felt that staying in China could endanger its users and potentially its employees.”

    Hennessy believes that e-mail infiltration is an obvious concern that students need to both understand and take steps to better protect themselves against.

    Seldon, who in high school protested the launch of Google China, now applauds the corporation for taking a stand for what she called “freedom, equality and justice.”

    “I feel like the fact that I am all the way here in America and I’m a U.S. citizen, and China can impede on my rights to personal freedom and my rights to know that I won’t be spied on, tells me something about the government,” she said.

  • Law school: fewer securities class action lawsuits filed in 2009

    Popular anger against deceit and fraud in company stocks and finances may have temporarily exhausted the possibilities for legal targets, according to Stanford researchers.

    A report released by the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse this week announced that shareholders filed fewer securities class action lawsuits in 2009 than in previous years. Last year, 169 federal security class action lawsuits were filed, down 24 percent from the 223 suits filed in 2008.

    Federal class action security lawsuits tracked by the Clearinghouse usually involve a group of plaintiffs who claim that a company has fraudulently caused for the inflation of stock prices.

    The sharpest decline was in lawsuits against the financial services industry, according to the annual report published by the Law School and Cornerstone Research. The report also found a decrease of 47 percent in lawsuits relating to the credit crisis—from 100 in 2008 to 53 in 2009. Of these 53, only 17 litigations were filed in the second half of the year.

    “Every major financial services company has already been sued,” explained Joseph Grundfest, director of the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse. “That pool is fished out.”

    Grundfest added that only one class action can be filed for each alleged wrongdoing, and so most of the litigation arising from the financial crisis has already been filed.

    The total maximum dollar loss, a measurement of shareholder losses experienced during the class period, fell by 24 percent to $634 billion. The total maximum dollar loss for litigation related to the credit crisis, however, fell by 38 percent to $459 billion.

    The report also sheds light on the movement of the financial crisis. The report indicated that the initial phase of the crisis, when many publicly traded firms saw their stock prices decline dramatically, had ended, Grundfest said.

    According to John Gould, senior vice president of Cornerstone Research, the decline in litigations coincided with a decrease in market volatility.

    “[The decline] really solidified the understanding that the number of filings really move in step with the volatility in the market,” Gould said.

    To conduct the research, Stanford Law School collects raw data, such as filings of new litigations, while Cornerstone Research conducts statistical analysis.

    One unusual finding this year was a longer delay between the date that the stock dropped and when the case was filed, according to Gould. The report found a median delay of 100 days; historically, the difference is approximately a month.

    However, Gould added that most of the delayed filings are attributed to one plaintiff, Coughlin Stoia Geller Rudman & Robbins.

    The historical average since the Clearinghouse began in 1996 is 197 litigations filed per year, 14 percent higher than this year’s finding. Gould estimates that the number of filings will increase again toward that average, although not in 2010.