Author: David Meyer

  • OnApp launches CDN.net, tapping spare capacity of federated service providers

    The British federated cloud company OnApp has launched CDN.net, a new brand for selling pay-as-you-go content delivery network (CDN) services directly to companies around the world.

    OnApp started out selling cloud orchestration software to hosting providers that wanted to get into the public cloud business. Over time, the firm built a sizeable federation of service provider customers, giving them the ability to use each others’ spare capacity – federated CDN launched in 2011; then came distributed storage; and federated compute capacity is next on the horizon.

    However, until now OnApp’s game has been all about helping service providers make the most of their spare resources within the federation – one provider may lack a point of presence (PoP) in a certain location but be able to use that of a fellow federation member, for example. CDN.net is OnApp’s first attempt at selling that federated capacity directly to end users, in this case companies that want to boost the performance of their websites in various locations around the globe.

    CDN.net offers access to over 150 PoPs, which is not as extensive a network as those offered by Akamai and Limelight, but way bigger than those from smaller players such as Yottaa, MaxCDN and CacheFly — it’s even slightly more wide-ranging than CDNetworks’ network. However, according to CDN.net marketing manager James Fletcher, the real selling point is CDN.net’s flexibility and pay-by-usage pricing:

    “It allows the end user to be in control of what they are purchasing … We saw in the marketplace that you can buy CDN and get a one-size-fits all solution, but that doesn’t work for everyone. The end result is you pay for resources and locations you don’t use. The CDN.net vision allows you to spin up on the fly and provision and customize as you need to.”

    At launch, CDN.net will only include 30 PoPs with a focus on Europe, North America and Asia-Pacific. However, OnApp is working to add locations in emerging markets and users will be able to add locations based on demand. “If the customer comes along and wants somewhere in South Africa, we can work with the service provider network to get one up and running,” Fletcher explained. Livestreaming capabilities will also go live soon.

    Ultimately, OnApp is trying to “help line the pockets of the service providers”, as Fletcher put it, but it’s also quietly becoming one of Europe’s most significant cloud players, perhaps the most significant. Others have talked about or even attempted this kind of federated model, but no-one has achieved the sort of scale that OnApp can boast – scale that it achieved by stealth, but that it’s now starting to exploit in earnest.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Swiss ‘social recruitment’ startup Silp partners up with semantics specialist x28

    The Zurich-based online recruitment firm Silp has signed a strategic partnership with x28, another Swiss recruitment technology firm that counts the likes of Adecco among its clients. It’s a partial exit of sorts, as x28 has bought an undisclosed number of shares from Silp’s founders, and will fund the company for the next couple of years and put its executives on Silp’s board.

    Silp has an unusual approach to the so-called “social recruitment” business. Plenty of startups are trying to exploit Facebook and other social media to help people find jobs, but Silp’s take is passive. People sign up using their Facebook account, saying that they might be interested in changing jobs at some point, and Silp gets to work extracting useful data from their Facebook profiles and combining it with other information from linked services such as Twitter, GitHub and About.me. Recruiters will then come to Silp with a list of requirements for prospective job candidates.

    Meanwhile, x28 deals in spidering and extraction, with a strong focus on ontology and semantics. According to Silp co-founder Dominik Grolimund, the two companies have complementary technologies — to give a very basic example, Silp might be really good at finding “software engineers”, but x28′s technology would help it know to also look for “programmers” and “developers”:

    “There’s synergy with their technology because [x28 is] good at crawling and extracting information in a structured way — making meaning out of the text is what they’re good at. They’re also really good at… adding semantics to the matching process.”

    Silp claims to have had a million people sign up within its first three weeks (the service launched last August). As those signing up also put their Facebook contacts into the system, that means the company has 150 million profiles in its database.

    According to Grolimund, after that epic first run of sign-ups Silp removed invite features in order to halt growth while the company worked on developing its service for employers – a service that will now have x28′s technology built into it, and that will be co-marketed by the two firms. “We’ll resume growth again once we release the employer product,” he said.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Now Autonomy is under investigation for fraud in the U.K.

    The U.K.’s Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has opened an investigation into Autonomy, the British data management firm that HP bought in 2011, much to its eventual regret. Autonomy’s accounting methods leading up to the sale are already being scrutinized by U.K. accountancy authorities — HP claims the firm inflated its figures ahead of the sale — but the involvement of the SFO is, as its name suggests, a much more serious matter.

    The SFO investigation was revealed in a filing that HP lodged with the U.S. SEC on Monday:

    “As a result of the findings of an ongoing investigation, HP has provided information to the U.K. Serious Fraud Office, the U.S. Department of Justice and the SEC related to the accounting improprieties, disclosure failures and misrepresentations at Autonomy that occurred prior to and in connection with HP’s acquisition of Autonomy. On November 21, 2012, representatives of the U.S. Department of Justice advised HP that they had opened an investigation relating to Autonomy. On February 6, 2013, representatives of the U.K. Serious Fraud Office advised HP that they had also opened an investigation relating to Autonomy. HP is cooperating with the three investigating agencies.”

    This whole matter is strange. HP’s anger was sparked by having to take a $5 billion write-down on the Autonomy deal roughly a year after it took place, not long after poor initial results saw Autonomy chief Mike Lynch jump ship. Lynch has protested his and his team’s innocence ever since, even setting up a blog to put forward his case.

    Just this month – so, after the SFO investigation was launched — Lynch was on stage at the London Web Summit repeating his assertion that HP has never fully explained what accounting improprieties the Autonomy team was supposed to have perpetrated.

    In that interview, Lynch suggested that HP’s problem was in its lack of strategy. He said erstwhile HP CEO Leo Apotheker bought Autonomy because he had understood the value of data, but HP had switched back to its previous hardware focus after defenestrating Apotheker and bringing in Meg Whitman as CEO. He also hinted that he and the former management of Autonomy had had no choice about the sale, due to the premium HP was offering.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Czechs pull plug on 4G spectrum auction after carriers bid too much

    Radio spectrum auctions are generally supposed to be about assigning spectrum in the most efficient way, so that new mobile services run as well as possible. That said, they also make money for governments, and some see this as their primary purpose.

    Not so the Czech telecoms regulator, CTU, which has suspended the country’s auction of spectrum in the 800MHz, 1800MHz and 2.6GHz bands because the carriers bid too much. The private equity firm PPF and the local businesses of telecoms giants Deutsche Telekom, Telefonica and Vodafone had collectively bid 20 billion crowns ($1.03 billion) before the regulator pulled the plug, saying investments of that level would mean unreasonably high prices for consumers.

    “When announcing the conditions in the first half of last year, we stressed that the main motivation of the auction was the quick availability of a 4G network for Czech citizens and the possible entry of a fourth operator — never about profits for the state,” CTU chairman Pavel Dvorak said in a statement (I’ve used an English translation of the quote from Reuters).

    Even though the reserve for the Czech auction was only $377 million, the billion-dollar figure doesn’t appear that high on the face of it: the UK spectrum auction last month pulled in $3.6 billion, and the Dutch auction in December accrued $5 billion.

    What’s wrong with raising too much? At the extreme end of the scale, we have the 3G spectrum auctions of a decade ago — there, carriers paid tens of billions for their licenses, effectively causing an industry-wide crash from which they and their vendors took years to recover. Let’s remind ourselves of what EU digital agenda commissioner Neelie Kroes had to say back in January, in reaction to the Dutch result:

    “Was nothing learned from previous auctions for UMTS [3G] frequencies, when the share price of KPN dropped substantially and the ecosystem of small supply companies in the telecom sector was severely damaged? … Telecom companies paid high prices. KPN saw a further decline in its credit rating. Prices for attracting money for infrastructure investments are expected to rise. The rollout of high-speed internet will slow down and the suppliers will be put out of business. This ‘Christmas gift’ could be a huge burden for the sector, and for all other businesses, entrepreneurs and citizens who need super-fast mobile internet.”

    Dvorak cited Kroes in his statement, pointing out that allowing excessive auction revenues would clash with his agency’s mandate of creating conditions for efficient investment. And so, the Czech Republic can look forward to a rebooted spectrum auction, hopefully sometime later this year.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Oops! 6Wunderkinder accidentally reveals details of upcoming Wunderlist Pro

    Professional users of 6Wunderkinder’s popular Wunderlist task management app look set to get a range of new features, as a “top secret” email to selected customers has revealed.

    On Monday the Berlin-based company’s Twitter account briefly spewed out links to a newsletter inviting the intended recipients to sign up early for a Wunderlist Pro account. Judging from the sneaky feature preview allowed by this accident, Wunderlist Pro will give teams more collaborative features – perhaps some of the functionality that was included in the axed Wunderkit project-management product.

    According to the newsletter, these are the features to look out for:

    • Assign to-dos to specific people on your team to know who is responsible for what
    • An unlimited amount of sub-tasks allows you to split your project in smaller steps no matter how big it is
    • 8 new backgrounds let you style Wunderlist the way you want it
    • Work seamlessly together in teams by sharing lists and tasks with an unlimited amount of people on all devices and platforms
    • Get access to latest beta versions and be amongst the first to use new features


    A spokeswoman for the company told me that the newsletter was only supposed to reach “a small group of 5,000 users” and that it was sent out to help 6Wunderkinder figure out its pricing strategy for Wunderlist Pro – as it stands, the quoted price in the newsletter I saw was $4.99 per month (others apparently saw $3.99 and other prices, so the team was clearly testing out various options).

    If all goes well, she added, Pro accounts will become available in April.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • SoundCloud may finally be gearing up to make some serious money

    SoundCloud is one of those rare European online startups that is cornering its market: if you want to embed or share pure audio, whether it be music or podcasts, you’ll probably use this service. But that said, even if SoundCloud is the great hope of the Berlin scene, its ability to turn a decent profit has remained questionable.

    A couple of moves revealed at SXSW on Monday may change that. The first is a drastic simplification and improvement of SoundCloud’s paid-for premium tiers -– the company’s primary source of income – while the second is the introduction of a so-called Pro Partners tier for brands. The Pro Partners tier is not only a serious potential revenue source, but it also introduces a visual element to the site that is likely to trickle down to ordinary consumer accounts in time.

    Freemium boost

    Let’s look at the simplified freemium model first (bearing in mind that free membership allows two hours of uploaded audio). Previously, SoundCloud had four paid tiers, starting on the Lite package, which offered four hours of audio for €29 ($38) a year, and grading up to a Pro Plus package that included unlimited audio and various analytics for €500 a year.

    There are now just two paid tiers for the average user: a Pro package that is priced the same as the old Lite (€29 annually or €3 a month) and offers the same amount of audio storage, but with added analytics and controls; and a Pro Unlimited tier that adds unlimited storage at €9 a month or €99 a year.

    In short, becoming a very heavy SoundCloud user just got significantly cheaper and more attractive.

    Paving the way for ads?

    Eric Wahlforss, Soundcloud co-founderThe Pro Partner program is in beta for now, with early users including Snoop Lion, Red Bull, The Guardian, Kevin Smith’s SModcast and even the Grammys (for the CenterStage talent contest). These brands and musicians are able to promote their profiles in the “Who To Follow” section, and they can also create what SoundCloud calls “moving sounds” — essentially, image slideshows that run behind the service’s trademark soundwave representations. Moving sounds can be reposted just like any normal audio stream, although they don’t work in embedded streams yet.

    As SoundCloud co-founder and CTO Eric Wahlforss pointed out to me, the company has been working with artists and major labels for a while now, but this move opens up new possibilities:

    “We’re changing the canvas so it becomes more visual. It’s cleaner and simpler. As an audio partner or a brand you get that canvas to express your identity on. It works for brands who are creators of audio content as well –- we’re only bringing on brands that are creators as well right now.

    “Some features — or all even, we hope –- will eventually trickle down to all of the tiers.”

    For artists, I can certainly see the introduction of “moving sounds” providing an opportunity for simple, stylish visual expression. The images will need to fit into the bar format used for all SoundCloud sounds, which differentiates the potential results from, say, those slideshows people create when wrangling an audio track into a terrible makeshift YouTube video.

    SoundCloud RedBullBut the real opportunity here will be for advertisers. It is now much easier to imagine a scenario where brief ads are inserted into streaming playlists, in between tracks, with both audio and moving graphics being part of the deal. And, asked whether this is the direction in which SoundCloud is heading, Wahlforss certainly didn’t deny the possibility:

    “In general, there is a whole movement of native advertising. We’ve seen success with YouTube with promoted content, so we feel there isn’t anything happening in audio on the native advertising side. We think we’re the best positioned of any service out there to do that and to really work with creators.

    “[However] we’re in the early stages right now; it’s in the experimental phase. Right now these pieces of content won’t appear unless a friend of yours reposts the content.”

    Wahlforss’s caution is well-advised: SoundCloud may be the de facto user-generated audio platform on the web now -– an expensive game to be playing -– but it is not invincible. People are willing to tolerate ads to some degree, but not if they are too intrusive. Monetizing this platform will mean walking a delicate line.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • German court backs HTC over Nokia patent claims

    Bad news for Nokia if it had serious hopes of extracting licensing fees from Android manufacturer HTC: a German court has just booted out two of the patent claims it launched there in May last year.

    The patents in question cover the use of “intelligent network” services such as alternative billing – the premise of this case was that HTC was supposedly infringing by using the Google Play app store — and a method for brightening and dimming phone screens. According to CIO, the Mannheim district court found in two separate judgements that HTC was not infringing on the patents in question.

    A Nokia spokesman was quoted as pointing out that the company still has 34 patents in suit against HTC, both in Germany and the U.S. He also hinted at an appeal. It’s worth pointing out that BlackBerry — known as Research In Motion at the time — was also one of the companies sued by Nokia, and it ended up agreeing to pay royalties (though not necessarily over these precise patents — such deals are usually pretty murky).

    It’s hard to feel sorry for Nokia when it comes to these HTC suits. It looks like the court agreed with HTC that Nokia was exaggerating the applicability of the network services patent – I certainly struggled to see how it could give Nokia a monopoly on app store functionality – and a win for Nokia might have meant unnecessary hassle for other Android manufacturers, too. I guess Nokia will just need to forge ahead with its turnaround on other merits.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • JDSU picks up Arieso for $85M to help carriers serve heavy mobile data users

    Optical equipment and network testing firm JDSU has bought the British location-aware software outfit Arieso, which helps carriers precisely site their small cells so they can better offload heavy users’ mobile data.

    Mobile networks are based on cells, which can only support so many local users at once before performance starts to head south. A really heavy user will speed up this process, so operators are increasingly looking at ways to pinpoint problem locations. The idea here is to deploy cheap equipment (such as femtocells, small cells or even Wi-Fi hotspots) exactly where it is needed, so someone with high data requirements doesn’t spoil the mobile internet experience for other customers in their vicinity.

    Arieso’s software does this by analyzing vast amounts of mobile connection events in a geolocated fashion, right down to building-level resolution. The firm is also, along with the likes of Intucell, one of the companies leading the emerging self-optimizing network (SON) trend, which will see radio access networks (RANs) dynamically adapt on a geographical basis so each cell is optimized for the levels of usage found at its location.

    The Arieso purchase, worth $85 million in cash, brings Milpitas, CA.-based JDSU new engineering expertise and technology based on proprietary algorithms, such as the AriesoGEO network monitoring and optimization package and the AriesoACP network-planning product. JDSU said in a statement that it would integrate these with its own portfolio, notably with PacketPortal – a cloud-based data-capture tool that can be embedded in carriers’ networks.

    Here’s what JDSU communications test and measurement chief David Heard had to say:

    “Arieso’s mobility expertise, market leadership and culture of innovation are directly in line with our strategy to deliver unmatched network visibility and intelligence to our customers. They are a recognized mobility leader and, as part of JDSU, create new, unique opportunities for innovation in one of the fastest-growing segments of the market.”

    According to JDSU, the RAN optimization and SON markets are worth around $700 million today, and will be worth over $1 billion by 2015.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • How not to rank countries in terms of ‘cloud readiness’

    Which countries are top of the world when it comes to “cloud readiness?” According to the Business Software Alliance (BSA), the top 5 in descending order are Japan, Australia, the U.S., Germany and Singapore, while emerging markets such as South Africa, Indonesia, Brazil, Thailand and Vietnam are at the bottom of the pile.

    But wait, what are we actually talking about here? To understand that, we first need to remind ourselves of what the BSA actually is: a lobbying association for software vendors ranging from Microsoft and Oracle to IBM and Apple. Probably best known for threatening small businesses over their use of “pirated” software, the BSA just released its second Global Cloud Scorecard, which purports to rank countries according to the cloud-friendliness of their legislative and regulatory policies.

    In practice, the scoring criteria are … interesting. For example, intellectual property rights are in there. From the BSA document:

    “Providers of cloud computing and digital economy technologies and services, as with other highly innovative products, rely on a combination of patents, copyrights, trade secrets, and other forms of intellectual property protection. Thus, to encourage investments in cloud research and development, as well as infrastructure, IP laws must provide strong incentives for these investments and clear protection and vigorous enforcement against misappropriation and infringement.”

    Presumably Japan’s willingness to do things like arrest file-sharers counted in its favor when the BSA was compiling its rankings. What does that have to do with cloud computing, in reality? Not a lot.

    Overall, the criteria we’re looking at are these:

    • Intellectual property rights: This is a heavily-weighted criterion. The BSA likes what Canada, Russia and India are doing, so they moved up the scale.
    • Data privacy: The BSA is all about “light touch regimes” here, explaining why Singapore, which introduced “broad, principles-based” data privacy laws last year while avoiding too much prescriptive detail, jumped from number 10 to number 5. Korea, which has proposed stricter data privacy rules, comes in for severe criticism, although its number-8 position remained unchanged. The EU, which is revising its data privacy legislation, is urged to bring in “clear rules”, not a “rigid framework”.
    • Security: Here the BSA is talking about both nationally-coordinated security measures (good) and factors such as censorship (bad). Russia’s score apparently took a hit because of internet censorship rules introduced in 2012, for example.
    • “Cybercrime”: This is mainly about legal deterrents to attacks. As such attacks are frequently cross-border, I’m not sure what the value is here, but it is at least theoretically a valid factor when talking about cloud policy.
    • Promoting free trade: Here the BSA seems mainly concerned with countries’ attitudes towards buying equipment from international suppliers, who – surprise surprise – will probably be BSA members. Still, with so much of the innovation in cloud technology coming from the U.S., they may have a point.
    • Infrastructure: This is the most heavily-weighted criterion, and sensibly so. It’s the criterion that makes the most objective sense when talking about cloud-readiness.

    So, how seriously should we take this scorecard? It’s difficult to say. Much of it is sensible, some is debatable and some is laughable – I’m sorry, but no matter how much you’re in favor of intellectual property rights, they don’t have a major effect on “cloud readiness”. For a much more reasonable take on such things, look for rankings that stick to criteria such as computer penetration, infrastructure and GDP.

    Nonetheless, the BSA scorecard does give a good flavor of what the big tech firms want to see when it comes to cloud policy — we can see this stance reflected in concerted lobbying operations around the world, so it is worth understanding.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Google tipped off EU authorities over Microsoft’s $732M browser boo-boo, report claims

    When Microsoft got fined $732 million by the European Commission on Wednesday for reneging on an agreement to give Windows users a clearer choice of browser, an interesting question in the back of many people’s minds was how on earth no-one noticed the browser choice screen’s omission for more than a year.

    After all, Windows 7 Service Pack 1 came out in February 2011 and it was only in mid-2012 that the Commission woke up and realized the fact that it was missing the screen in question. Microsoft claimed it was itself unaware of the omission until the Commission brought it up.

    Well, we’re still fuzzy on how both Microsoft and the Commission stayed oblivious for so long, but we do now have a better idea of how the company got busted: according to anonymous sources quoted in a Financial Times piece (registration required) that went up a few hours ago, the tip-off came from Google and Opera.

    Opera is certainly no surprise – the Norwegian browser vendor was after all the original complainant that led the Commission to wring promises of good behavior from Microsoft back in 2009. But Google’s involvement, if the report is correct, shows this to be just one stage in an increasingly bitter war.

    Remember that Chrome vendor Google is also embroiled in an EU antitrust investigation, in this case regarding allegations of search result manipulation and various other anticompetitive practices. And who kicked off that investigation? Why, Microsoft of course, along with various others subsequently involved in its faux-grassroots “Fair Search” organization.

    Then we have Microsoft’s recent Scroogled anti-Google smear campaign, and Google’s decision to suddenly yank Exchange ActiveSync support for Windows Phone owners who use Gmail services, which threatened a serious hit on that smartphone platform’s usability.

    In isolation, each one of these moves can be explained and perhaps justified on its own merits. Together, though, they paint a picture of escalating nastiness. Sure, companies fight all the time — it’s part of healthy competition. But right now the goings-on between Google and Microsoft risk appearing as petty and destructive as those between Apple and Samsung.

    This article was updated at 5:45am PT to make it more explicit that Google makes the Chrome browser and therefore has an interest in browser choice.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Always taking the weather with you? Here’s a cool thermometer dongle for better readings

    Here’s a neat new Kickstarter project: a tiny ambient thermometer that you can plug into your smartphone or tablet. Because your mobile device doesn’t have enough sensors already.

    The device is called Thermodo and, appropriately, it comes from Danish software firm Robocat, which was responsible for the graphically intriguing Haze weather app. Smartphones do already have thermometers in them, but those are for keeping an eye on the handset’s internals: this would be for checking the temperature around you.

    The interface with the mobile device is quite interesting: unlike iCelsius, a range of iOS-compatible thermometers designed for cooking and educational purposes, Thermodo doesn’t plug into the dock connector. From the Kickstarter blurb:

    “Thermodo consists of a passive temperature sensor built into a standard 4 pole audio jack enclosed by a sturdy housing. This allows your mobile device to read Thermodo’s temperature straight from the audio input. Thermodo sends an audio signal through the temperature sensor. This sensor will then attenuate the signal amplitude depending on the actual temperature. This attenuation can now be detected on the microphone input and through software we calculate the corresponding temperature. Easy peasy!”

    Because all mobile devices have headphone jacks, Thermodo should theoretically work on all smartphones and tablets. Robocat founder Willi Wu told me a companion app will be made available for iOS first, although it will also work with the company’s existing Thermo app on Android.

    If it works as advertised, then Thermodo might be quite useful for budding meteorologists. “Thermometer” apps (including Robocat’s Thermo) tend to simply use location-based weather data, whereas this seems to be the real deal — think users being able to feed weather data to the cloud, rather than simply drawing data from it. What’s more, Robocat will also release a software development kit for Android, so the device may find itself being used in a new generation of temperature-aware apps.

    However, one of the most immediate problems that springs to mind with the Thermodo concept has to do with heat sources that might distort the device’s readings. The first of those heat sources is the smartphone or tablet itself: here, Wu told me the software compensates, plus “we improved the design of Thermodo in a way that we could thermally decouple the sensor from the mini jack”. And then there’s the pocket problem. Thermodo will generally be carried around in a pocket — as this is a much more unpredictable heat source than the mobile device, how does the team get round it?

    “When you plug Thermodo into your device you will read Thermodo’s temperature in its environment. Hence, if you have it in your pocket you will get the temperature of your pocket,” Wu said. “However, we are trying to detect rapid changes in temperature and make the user aware of it. We are even experimenting with some prediction algorithms in order to reduce the effect of this.”

    According to Robocat’s timetable, the company hopes to ship units in August. The cost is likely to be around the $30 mark, and it will come in black, white, and anodyzed aluminum. They’re looking for $35,000 in funding, and here’s the pitch:


    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Why telcos may finally be moving past app store envy

    Remember the early days of mobile content, before the iPhone, when you’d fire up your mobile browser and see your operator’s “portal”? Those portals are still around, incredibly, but not for much longer.

    Juniper Research has just put out a report about mobile content business models and, according to the UK analyst firm, just 6 percent of content downloads now come from these portals, with the rest being attributable to third-party stores, chiefly Apple’s App Store and Google’s Play store. Frankly the 6 percent figure is surprisingly high – report author Windsor Holden told me the portals in question belong to “China Mobile and two or three others”, and even those are “going to wither away over the next few years”.

    And the real money isn’t even in app sales, as Holden explained:

    “Only a small proportion of apps are monetized at the point of sale. On the App Store it’s at the 10 percent mark, and it’s around 3 percent on Google Play. Where the apps are really making money is in terms of in-app payments and in-app billing. If you look at the highest-grossing apps… none of them are predicated on the pay-for-download model.”

    In selling all those virtual swords and poker chips, the standard developer-OS vendor split is 70-30, meaning the carrier needs to try to wrangle some share out of that 30 percent cut. Is that just wishful thinking on the operators’ part? Not necessarily.

    What carriers have to offer

    According to Holden, there is still a problem that needs to be solved if even more money is going to be made out of mobile apps: in order to buy apps and make in-app purchases, the customer needs to register a bank card. And who doesn’t have one of those? Kids, and a heck of a lot of people in developing countries – in these segments, the ability to buy content with pre-paid phone credit makes a whole lot of sense.

    “While operators have never been the best at direct content sales, there is a growing opportunity for operators to monetize their assets,” he said. “On a number of storefronts, including those for Nokia and BlackBerry, the conversion rates when you add carrier billing go up by a factor of 5 or 6 – there’s significant uplift on second or third purchases.”

    In the U.S., customers of operators such as Sprint and Verizon can do this for Android apps, and Holden reckons around 15 percent of such transactions take place through carrier billing in that country. Globally, Juniper expects carrier billing-derived mobile content revenues to soar from $2 billion to $13 billion between now and 2017.

    Of course, iOS is not part of this party, as Apple doesn’t share like that. However, Holden said, the flow of second-hand iOS devices into developing nations may eventually mean Cupertino is missing out on an opportunity — would it rather share revenues, or not make any?

    Welcome evolution

    This shift towards giving operators a slice of the pie is, in my opinion, a good thing – not because the operators deserve it by virtue of existing (a stance they’ve taken many times before), but because it rewards them for the use of assets that only they can provide.

    We can see an analogy in the slow but steady emergence of carrier apps that exploit the good old mobile phone number. In that case, the operator’s asset is its ability to manage identity — my colleague Kevin Fitchard reported just the other day on an interesting new carrier initiative called OneAPI that shows how serious they are about expanding this role. In the case of app and content sales, the carrier can capitalize on the existing billing relationship it has with its customer — this makes the smartphone game more lucrative for the carrier while making life easier for the customer (see also: carriers getting a cut of Skype credit sales).

    Recent years have involved so much struggle on the part of the operators against newer, more nimble players in the mobile value chain, but carriers are starting to find a comfortable and rewarding new position in that chain. In time, this evolution of their role may reshape the mobile ecosystem yet again.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Europe hits Microsoft with $730M fine over browser choice ‘error’

    This story was updated at 4.55am PT with a quote from Microsoft.

    Well whaddya know. When you’ve been the subject of a lengthy antitrust investigation and you settle with the authorities by promising to clean up your act, then “accidentally” go back to doing what you were doing in the first place and you get caught, you might find yourself in expensive trouble.

    That’s what happened with Microsoft and its bundling of Internet Explorer (IE) with Windows in Europe, and now we see the result: a €561 million ($732 million) fine, handed down on Wednesday by Competition Commissioner Joaquin Almunia.

    That’s a lot of money. What happened?

    Last decade, Opera complained to the European Commission about the fact that Microsoft bundled IE with Windows, to the detriment of third-party rivals such as Opera, Mozilla Firefox, Apple Safari and Google Chrome. The resulting antitrust case was dropped in 2009 when Microsoft promised to introduce a browser choice or “browser ballot” screen, so when users fire up a copy of Windows for the first time and open IE, it will ask them which of the various browsers on the market they’d like to go with.

    CEO Steve BallmerAs part of the deal, Microsoft agreed to submit an annual compliance report to the European Commission. For a couple years, everything went according to plan, right up until Microsoft’s December 2011 compliance report, which assured Almunia’s office that everything was hunky-dory. Only it wasn’t: the browser choice screen (BCS) had somehow been left out of Windows 7 Service Pack 1, which came out in February 2011, and Microsoft’s report was false.

    When the Commission found out in mid-2012 and opened a fresh investigation into Microsoft and its bundled browser, the company immediately confessed, blaming the BCS’s omission on a “technical error” that somehow went unnoticed for more than a year. Microsoft said it had pushed out the BCS software to the 15 million affected users as soon as it realized its error, but Almunia nonetheless put the company on notice that it could face a fine of up to 10 percent of its global annual turnover: around $7 billion.

    So it could have been much worse. Why not the full amount?

    According to Almunia, “such a breach is of course very serious, irrespective of when it was intentional or not, and it calls for sanctions”.

    However, he said on Wednesday that he set the figure at the level he did — around one percent of turnover — because “once the breach was discovered Microsoft cooperated with us and provided information which helped the investigation”.

    And that’s why this isn’t even a record for Microsoft in terms of EU antitrust fines.

    Incidentally, Microsoft says it won’t appeal this time round:

    “We take full responsibility for the technical error that caused this problem and have apologized for it. We provided the Commission with a complete and candid assessment of the situation, and we have taken steps to strengthen our software development and other processes to help avoid this mistake — or anything similar — in the future.”

    Could Microsoft be in a similar situation again?

    Tough question. The reason the European Commission came down so hard on Microsoft in the first place was that Windows was so utterly dominant in personal computing -– it really mattered if IE was bundled and the ordinary user may have been left unaware than rivals existed.

    Browser ballotWe can see the results for ourselves. Chrome is now the world’s leading web browser, ahead of IE and Firefox (which also benefited greatly from the decision). And if you play around with IE10, the most recent version, you will see an iteration of the browser that reflects Microsoft’s need to keep up with those rivals: the company was forced to be competitive, which is surely one of the key points of antitrust law.

    However, times change. While Windows still dominates the personal computing market by installed base, the PC sector – by which I mean the hardware, distinct from the concept of personal computing – is unarguably in decline as the world shifts to mobile. So, while in the 2000s Microsoft was the titan stomping all over OS X and Linux (by market share), today we find Windows 8 battling it out against iOS and Android across several hardware form factors.

    This matters because the core concept of competition law is what is known as “significant market power” – the European Commission felt it had to crack down on Microsoft because it had such power in the established personal computing market. Now it’s losing its grip on that power, and quickly.

    We are unlikely to see antitrust regulators crack down on Microsoft, or indeed Apple or Google, in the same way again – at least the way the market is shaping up now.

    Windows 8 is still an unknown quantity. Someone out there may want to complain that the iPad comes with Safari preinstalled and doesn’t prompt the user to install Chrome or Opera, but, while the iPad is the dominant tablet, it isn’t so dominant that it requires that kind of regulatory intervention. Also, the tablet market is in itself immature, so early regulation could be seen as distorting the market rather than protecting the consumer.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Transferwise’s ‘peer-to-peer’ international money transfer system just got easier to use

    London-based Transferwise is potentially one of the most disruptive financial tech startups out there – the company offers cross-border money transfers with extremely low charges by exploiting a P2P-esque network of local payments – but its mechanism has always been a bit clunky to use. That’s changing, though, as the company has just enabled debit card payments.

    That may sound like a small change, but it’s pretty fundamental to Transferwise’s future. Here’s why.

    The previous system involved three steps (or, from the customer’s perspective, two). An example: a British customer would go to Transferwise’s website and say that they wanted to send £100 ($151), for example, from the UK to Germany. They would then need to visit their own UK bank’s online banking facility to transfer the £100 to Transferwise’s UK account. The startup would then take the euro equivalent out of its German funds – stocked up by users in that country – and make a local payment in Germany to the intended recipient.

    The introduction of debit card payments removes that second step, meaning the customer can now do everything they need to do in one go on Transferwise’s website. This removes a major source of friction, and I would be surprised if it didn’t accelerate the company’s growth quite quickly (Transferwise did £10 million in currency traffic in its first year, up until the end of February 2012, and by the end of 2012 it had done £50 million).

    “We made it simpler and faster for our customers,” CEO Taavet Hinrikus, who was once Skype’s first employee, told me.

    According to Hinrikus, Transferwise’s customer base largely consists of individuals and small businesses, and the average transfer amount is around £1,300. The company offers savings of up to 85 percent on standard international transfer rates, levying a £1 charge on transfers up to £200 and typically just 0.5 percent on larger transfers. Exchange rates are taken straight from the interbank market without any fiddling of the going rate (as happens with some banks and wire transfer companies).

    There are limits to what Transferwise can do, though, and regulation is unsurprisingly (and understandably) the limiting factor. Within Europe, if you’re a financial services company and you’re given the all-clear by one national financial regulator (the UK’s Financial Services Authority or FSA, in Transferwise’s case) then you’re fine to operate anywhere on the continent. However, the company does not have regulatory clearance in other parts of the world, such as the U.S.

    For that reason, although Transferwise can handle transfers from Europe to the U.S., paying out in U.S. dollars, it can’t handle the reverse transaction. The same will apply to Canadian dollars, which the platform will start supporting in a week or so. You may be wondering how that works if Transferwise can’t actually have customers in the U.S. or Canada — according to Hinrikus, the company uses “large corporate peers” on that side of the Atlantic, including large companies sending money to Europe, other trading platforms and “financial markets”.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Opera’s new Android beta is out, and it includes some pretty big changes

    Opera has released the first public version of its new mobile browser, initially on Android. The beta is notable for a variety of reasons, not least because it is the first fruit of the company’s under-the-hood shift to WebKit and other new technologies, but also because it represents a major revamp on the front-end.

    For a start, the URL and search bars are now one, much as is the case in Chrome. The startup screen has also been significantly overhauled, adding a curated content discovery feature that is slightly reminiscent of Google Currents, and a history page that is easier to access than before. Private browsing is now an option, as it is in rival mobile browsers these days.

    On top of that, the Opera team has decided to tweak the Speed Dial concept: Speed Dial links are a narrow selection of favorite pages that show up on new tabs, and now Opera treats them like the bookmarks they are by allowed the user to organize them in folders.

    Beyond these changes, the browser still includes the features that already make Opera popular with a subset of users, such as optional server-side compression to cut down on data usage and speed up page loads, and the ability to save pages for offline reading,

    This was a much-needed overhaul. Opera’s problem has always been that it looked very different – that was because the company tried to do things differently, and they did succeed in introducing new concepts that others picked up on (Speed Dial was one and, at the risk of enraging Firefox fans, tabbed browsing was arguably another). This iteration has a very native-Android look, though not so much as to appear like a me-too browser. Features such as the combined URL/search bar may be unoriginal, but they were worth copying.

    The start screen, meanwhile, is in my opinion now leaps ahead of the competition, being more intuitive, more feature-rich and perhaps even more attractive than that offered by Chrome. Bearing in mind that this is the first of the new Opera browsers to come out – expect revamps across the board – it’s a good omen of things to come.


    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Deutsche Telekom activates Joyn for richer communications

    Deutsche Telekom has adopted Joyn with immediate effect, allowing its mobile customers in Germany to use the platform to message, share files and videos and even play basic multiplayer games while talking to each other.

    Joyn (technically known as Rich Communications Services or RCS) is an industry-wide initiative designed to counter third-party applications such as WhatsApp by augmenting the traditional voice-and-text functionality offered by the carrier. It doesn’t make a huge amount of sense unless your contact’s carrier also supports it – and so far, only users in Spain and South Korea can be sure that theirs does.

    Vodafone and Deutsche Telekom are the two biggest carriers in Germany, though, and both now support Joyn. That means quite a lot of people in the country will be able to use the service, the features of which are free. As in other deployments, initial usage will have to be through a special app – the Android version is available now, and iOS will follow soon – while upcoming handsets from manufacturers such as Samsung and Nokia will have Joyn baked in.

    It’s too early to tell how successful Joyn will be at this early stage. It will certainly have a tough time in the U.S., where so far only MetroPCS has set it live. In South Korea, though, operator SK Telecom said in February that it had garnered a million Joyn users in just a couple of months since launch.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • These companies want to take the complexity out of online travel booking, but can they?

    Booking a long-distance journey online can be a fragmented affair. Travel operators like to keep it that way: they want to keep control over offers and pricing, so they steer customers to book directly on their websites. That’s why we have services such as Skyscanner that make it possible to compare offers on different airlines, for example, but that will always send you to the chosen airline’s own website to seal the deal.

    But, as two Berlin-based startups called GoEuro and Waymate show, change is underway – a new generation of heavily algorithm-driven travel site promises to make it much easier to compare different types and combinations of transport type, from air to rail to bus, and perhaps even to book multimodal journeys through a unified portal. GoEuro announced the closure of a hefty $4 million seed financing round today, so let’s talk about them first.

    Big solutions need big money

    GoEuro’s idea is this: one search will show you your travel options between all European cities, towns and villages, including air, rail, bus and car rental. Customers can then choose which combination of these transport modes suits them best, based on criteria including price, convenience and total travel time. A closed beta should launch in a few weeks’ time and, all going well, the full service will open up a few weeks after that.

    Naren ShaamThe seed round was led by Battery Ventures, which previously invested in travel and accommodation companies such as Hotel Tonight and GoGoBot, and Hasso Plattner Ventures, was set up by the SAP founder. Others involved include ITA Software’s Dave Baggett and Global Eagle Entertainment’s Jeff Sagansky – this is a serious crowd and, within Europe alone, GoEuro has a serious problem in its sights.

    As GoEuro CEO Naren Shaam explained to me, travel across Europe can be particularly complex partly due to the sheer number of operators in those dozens of countries:

    “The financing is mainly going to scale up the technology to integrate some of the partnerships we already have lined up into our platform. Within Europe the number of travel options is huge: train and bus infrastructure is as good as air. And with deregulation, there are a lot of travel providers across Europe.

    “Air has a standardized platform – TXL is Berlin Tegel airport [whether you’re booking from] Sydney or wherever, but train stations are different. The magnitude of integration is far different from building an air search platform. That requires resources that are able to tackle this challenge.”

    A platform such as this would be a big step for Europe’s fragmented travel market, but at the same time GoEuro is still hewing to the traditional model of providing comparison transparency, then sending the user off to the operator’s site to actually book the various legs of their journey (Shaam said this was based on deep links, though, so the user should then be part-way through the booking process when they land on the operator’s site).

    According to Shaam, GoEuro is holding back for now on taking that extra step because of the complexity it would entail, in terms of both infrastructure and customer service requirements. One country may allow electronic ticketing, for example, while another may not. Leaving the booking to the operator also removes the need to deal with what happens in the event of a partial cancellation – there, the customer will have to engage with the travel operator, much as they do now.

    The next step

    Waymate does not have $4 million in the bank – it’s currently angel-funded by Günther Lamperstorfer, co-founder of the IT services firm CompuNet – but that doesn’t stop it from having even more ambitious plans than its neighbor does.

    WaymateRight now, Waymate lets web users buy tickets for Deutsche Bahn (DB), the German national rail operator. That in itself is a minor achievement – like many such companies, DB is notoriously tight-fisted with its station and timetable data, and not many startups have been chosen as approved partners with the ability to handle DB bookings (UK rail-booking outfit Loco2 trumpeted a similar deal back in January). These bookings are made on the intermediary’s website – customers don’t need to go through to the operator’s site, even to pick up the operator’s frequent traveller points.

    But that’s only the start. Waymate wants to apply the same principle to two different use cases: intercity travel, of the sort GoEuro is involved in, and local travel. The company will soon produce apps for both purposes, and late this year or in early 2014 it wants to combine both into a single service – one app to book them all, if you like. As CEO Maxim Nohroudi told me when we spoke a month or so ago:

    “We are working on integrating flights, but then we thought, let’s not forget about the door-to-door case. One you arrive in Munich, for example, you want to know the local transport options – all public transport, plus car-sharing, plus taxi.”

    Waymate intends to allow the same kind of user criteria as GoEuro will allow. Now, there are some multimodal transport booking sites out there, but they tend to come from the transport firms themselves, particularly the rail operators, making their neutrality doubtful. The big issue is getting access to all the necessary players as a neutral party. In Waymate’s case, that was only made possible by winning an EU Smart Mobility Challenge last year.

    And even then, Waymate CFO Tom Kirschbaum noted, you hit the data problem. Sure, you can scrape station and timetable information, but that kind of data needs to be regularly updated:

    “Now we have managed to get over these entry barriers, to discuss with those public transport companies, and they said their data was all their own property. Many players… have established data regimes based on an API, but that’s not the end of the discussion. You have to convince them you’re a solid player.”

    As a result, Waymate will build up its own infrastructure so that, in time, it can store and handle large amounts of data without relying on APIs. As all this data will need to be subject to a single algorithm in order to return speedy and useful results, this will be an essential move, and an expensive one.

    What these companies are trying to do is really, really hard. The pitfalls are many – from massive complexity to closed-off data and competitors with vested interests. But the rewards will be huge, not only for those who can pull it off – if indeed they can pull it off – but also for the consumer. There is real value in increasing transparency and reducing complexity in the travel-booking business. Watch this space.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Fon scores a big one: crowdsourced Wi-Fi community signs DT for millions of hotspots

    It may not be the investment that was rumored earlier this year, but Deutsche Telekom has struck a deal with the crowdsourced Wi-Fi outfit Fon to provide coverage across Germany. This comes a month after Fon signed with a DT subsidiary in Croatia – a country, as we pointed out at the time, that DT sometimes uses as a testbed for new services that it intends to roll out more widely.

    Fon is a community of people who submit their Wi-Fi hotspots for inclusion in a global pool. By doing so they become “Foneros” who let others use their Wi-Fi connections for free, and in exchange they get to do the same around the world. Due to ISPs’ terms and conditions, which generally forbid letting strangers onto customers’ connections, this idea works best in concert with the ISPs themselves – BT in the UK was a trailblazer here, and DT is certainly one of the biggest ISPs that Fon has landed.

    The DT offering is called WLAN TO GO, and through it DT’s customers who offer up their own connection will gain access to around 8 million hotspots worldwide. As DT itself has 12 million broadband lines and around 12,000 Wi-Fi hotspots, there’s clearly scope for major expansion of Fon’s reach too – this deal doesn’t just cover Germany, but also DT’s local subsidiaries in Bulgaria, Greece, Romania, Slovakia and Hungary.

    For DT, there’s an extra motivation too: if its customers start using more hotspots, they will theoretically use less mobile data – a boon for networks feeling the strain of bandwidth hogs such as mobile video. Here’s how DT CEO Rene Obermann put it in a statement this morning:

    “The partnership with FON fits perfectly with Telekom’s network expansion strategy. The astonishing increase in data traffic calls for network optimization and expansion, as well as the implementation of new high-speed networks.

    “By the year 2016, we want to set up more than 2.5 million additional hotspots in Germany with the WLAN TO GO offering. With our technology mix of mobile communication, fixed lines and Wi-Fi, we can gradually introduce our customers to the benefits of internet access anywhere and anytime.”

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • UpCloud bursts out of Finland for European launch, with U.S. in sights for this year

    An ambitious Finnish infrastructure-as-a-service company called UpCloud has launched across Europe with local rivals such as CloudSigma and Elastichosts in its sights, and U.S. expansion already on the agenda.

    The first two data centers are in London and Helsinki, and more are planned for Chicago towards the middle of the year, then Las Vegas and Singapore. A spin-off of sorts from the established Finnish hosting firm Sigmatic, UpCloud claims to have 100 percent homegrown virtualization tech. According to general manager Antti Vilpponen, this keeps costs low and services flexible:

    “Our offering is truly scaleable and flexible – we’re not giving any predetermined set of instances. You can freely choose the amount of CPUs, memory and storage… We’re really fast -– all servers are deployed in less than 60 seconds -– and our network stack is 100 percent redundant.”

    Alongside enterprise-grade redundancy, the company offers fully dedicated server resources and one-click migration between availability zones. What’s more, Vilponnen said, unlike with Amazon Web Services, the cheapest service levels UpCloud offers have the same level of performance you’d get with more expensive packages. As the tech was built in-house, UpCloud offers a 100 percent Service Level Agreement (SLA) and 50x downtime compensation — that’s a decent uptime guarantee, which should bolster the enterprise-grade status UpCloud is going for.

    There’s a browser-based control panel and apps for Android and iOS, while those with more complex control needs also have an API (although it’s not fully Amazon compatible) that they can play with. CPU, memory, storage – both HDD and SSD — OS, firewall and IP addresses are all billed on an hourly basis. Network traffics and storage device I/O requests are billed by use.

    Right now UpCloud is being personally bankrolled by founder and CTO Joel Pihlajamaa, who is also Sigmatic’s CEO. That makes it pretty impressive to see the company apparently already undercutting local rivals, if not Amazon itself at this point. For example, Vilponnen showed me a chart showing a low-tier UpCloud package of 2GB memory and 100GB storage priced at €41.84 ($54.47) monthly, versus €57.40 on Elastichosts and €72.03 on CloudSigma (it should be noted that CPU amounts were included in the calculation but not explicit in the price, “as they change quite a lot between the providers”).

    “We really think offering constantly high-performing resources at affordable prices is key to how want to position ourselves,” Vilponnen said. “We won’t be able to overcome Amazon in Europe within a couple of years, but we’ve got big plans.”

    UpCloud is even offering the first 1,000 people that register from Monday morning (and buy €10 of credit) an extra €100 in free credit, so there’s clearly a fair amount of money to back this up — for now. Bootstrapping will only take you so far in the scale-driven cloud business, though, so UpCloud would do well to raise fresh funding this year, as it intends to.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

  • Telefonica’s Tu Go shows that, finally, a telco has figured out the value of the app

    Mobile carriers have been fighting against so-called over-the-top (OTT) apps for quite some time now. These are generally third-party apps we’re talking about here, that are called “OTT” because they run on top of the carriers’ data services.

    The carriers hate OTT apps because – they claim – they don’t make any money off them. This is nonsense, of course: the use of these apps drives the sales of new devices, and of the data services themselves. The real reason carriers hate them is because they’re often better rivals to the carriers’ own legacy services, including voice (Skype, for example) and SMS (WhatsApp).

    And so the carriers have been experimenting with services that act as direct rivals to the likes of Skype and WhatsApp: Orange has Libon, T-Mobile USA has Bobsled and Telefonica has Tu Me. The problem is, these apps all just do what their third-party rivals do. For the carriers that are putting them out, they act as little more than brand ambassadors. They don’t actually create much value for the carriers’ existing customers, nor are their new platforms innovative enough to lure users from third-party rivals.

    Until now. Someone has finally got the point. The carrier in question is Telefonica again, and the app – now available for O2 UK contract customers only – is called Tu Go. The proposition is very simple. Using the Tu Go app on Android, iOS or the PC, subscribers can make and receive calls and texts over Wi-Fi using their normal mobile number. The calls and texts come out of their standard allowances.

    But surely it’s better to use a new-generation platform, I hear you say. Not always. For example, I work from home and I call people using Skype an awful lot, largely because the mobile coverage in my apartment is dreadful. Skype’s cheaper than mobile in most cases, but it doesn’t show the recipient of my calls the phone number printed on my business cards. Also, it means having multiple billing accounts. With a service like Tu Go, problem solved.

    This isn’t trying to create yet another platform. All it’s doing is using the power of the app to bring legacy functionality into the modern age; to make it more useful. Telefonica has realized that you don’t fight the upstart by creating a separate platform to your core product: you adapt and extend your core product instead.

    Will it be enough to fend off the upstarts? For some users, it will; for those who gave up on their mobile operator a while back, it won’t. But it’s the first OTT app I’ve seen from a carrier that doesn’t feel like they’re flailing around in response to their IP-only rivals. Having covered this stuff for a while, I could weep with joy.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.