Author: David Weigel

  • Breitbart Bets Rep. John Lewis $10,000 That No One Hurled the ‘N-Word’ at Him

    My story today focuses on the pushback from conservatives who have issued apologies for some far-out behavior by a few activists last weekend. Andrew Breitbart goes further than anyone I quoted. Breitbart, like Gary Bauer, accuses Reps. John Lewis (D-Ga.), Andre Carson (D-Ind.) and Emanuel Cleaver (D-Mo.) of lying about the attacks against them after trying to provoke “a YouTube incident” by walking through the crowd.

    It’s time for the allegedly pristine character of Rep. John Lewis to put up or shut up. Therefore, I am offering $10,000 of my own money to provide hard evidence that the N- word was hurled at him not 15 times, as his colleague reported, but just once. Surely one of those two cameras wielded by members of his entourage will prove his point.

    And surely if those cameras did not capture such abhorrence, then someone from the mainstream media — those who printed and broadcast his assertions without any reasonable questioning or investigation — must themselves surely have it on camera. Of course we already know they don’t. If they did, you’d have seen it by now.

    THOUSANDS OF TIMES.

    Rep. Lewis, if you can’t do that, I’ll give him a backup plan: a lie detector test. If you provide verifiable video evidence showing that a single racist epithet was hurled as you walked among the tea partiers, or you pass a simple lie detector test, I will provide a $10K check to the United Negro College Fund.

    Thanks to the cell phone videos of the event, I think “the myth of the March 20 slurs” will become an accepted fact inside the Tea Parties.

  • Frum Explains: He Was Forced Out by Donor Pressure

    David Frum explains to Mike Allen his departure from the American Enterprise Institute. (Frum politely declined to explain much more about the situation to me last night.)

    There’s a lot about the story I don’t really understand. But the core of the story is the kind of economic pressure that intellectual conservatives are under. AEI represents the best of the conservative world. [AEI President] Arthur Brooks is a brilliant man, and his books are fantastic. But the elite isn’t leading anymore. It’s trapped. Partly because of the desperate economic situation in the country, what were once the leading institutions of conservatism are constrained. I think Arthur took no pleasure in this. I think he was embarrassed. I think he would have avoided it if he possibly could, but he couldn’t.

    I’ve got a copy of Brooks’ upcoming political book, “The Battle.” It’s the kind of thing that will please donors, but it really presents no challenge to GOP strategy and rhetoric. Meanwhile, as Frum tweeted last night, AEI has retained Jonah Goldberg and Marc Thiessen — two big names in conservatism, but not two who have criticized the party for failing to work with Democrats.

  • Conservatives Attack ‘Double Standard’ on Health Care Threats

    Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) and Tea Party demonstrators (EPA/ZUMApress.com, David Weigel)

    Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) and Tea Party demonstrators (EPA/ZUMApress.com, David Weigel)

    Brendan Steinhauser, the director of campaigns for FreedomWorks, helped put together two days of rallies against health care legislation on Capitol Hill. Much of the coverage of those rallies focused on alleged incidents of racial and sexual slurs against Democratic members of Congress who were walking into the building for negotiations over the vote. And that, to Steinhauser, was ridiculous.

    Image by: Matt Mahurin

    Image by: Matt Mahurin

    “Ninety-nine percent of the people out there were good, patriotic Americans,” Steinhauser told TWI. “Those are our people. But what we heard about were these very few incidents of alleged racial slurs which I haven’t seen evidence of. I’d like to see the video if it’s out there.”

    Steinhauser was not alone. On March 21, Missouri-based blogger Jim Hoft posted “video proof that these horrible leftists are liars” in the form of a noisy, 48-second clip of several black members of Congress being heckled, with no racial slurs audible amid the din. “These radical liars with stop at nothing to ram their socialist agenda down America’s throat,” wrote Hoft. And across Washington, many conservatives shared doubts about a story that had damaged and embarrassed Republicans, prompting catch-all apologies from Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio) and Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.). One hot rumor was that Rep. Andre Carson (D-Ind.) had excitedly hyped and sold the “slurs” story to reporters; another was that police wanted to debunk the story, but had to stay off the record. (Reports on the event were based on the personal accounts of the congressmen and of a criminal complaint filed by Rep. Emanuel Cleaver, D- Mo., that Cleaver then dropped, without explanation.)

    Over the long, angry week since the health care care vote, as more than a dozen members of Congress reported threats or attacks to their homes and offices, Tea Party leaders and Republicans have put out condemnations and apologies. That doesn’t quite reflect the sentiment inside the movement — a belief that the media and the Democratic Party are hyping, and possibly fabricating, racist or violent attacks to tar their opposition.

    “The American people,” said Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) in a Thursday floor speech, “have every right to oppose this government takeover of health care without being lumped in with bigots and vandals by liberals in Congress and in the mainstream press.”

    This isn’t the first time Tea Party activists have been accused by Democrats of slurs, violence, and anti-democratic threats — or the first time Republicans have been accused of indulging them. In August 2009, stories and video of angry activists at congressional town hall meetings polarized Washington. Democrats accused Tea Partiers of organizing “un-American” mob scenes. Republicans embraced the activists, and credited their rowdiness with keeping the health care bill on ice.

    “Since last July,” said Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) at Saturday’s rally, before the reported slur incidents, “you have put the brakes on this health care bill! The other day, the president, who was planning a trip to Southeast Asia, canceled his trip! You have grounded Air Force One!”

    But it took several days for Tea Partiers and Republicans to start fighting back against was they saw as a concerted effort to disqualify their arguments about the health care bill. By Thursday, all leading Tea Party groups and Republicans had issued condemnations of the reported attacks. (”ResistNet Does NOT ADVOCATE Violence!” read one banner on the website of a leading grassroots group.) Those condemnations gave conservatives the space to blame Democrats for pushing so many stories of threats to members of Congress.

    “I have deep concerns,” said Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.) in a Thursday press conference about a mysterious incident involving a gun fired near an office he sometimes uses, “that some – DCCC Chairman Chris Van Hollen and DNC Chairman Tim Kaine in particular – are dangerously fanning the flames by suggesting that these incidents be used as a political weapon.  Security threats against members of Congress is not a partisan issue and they should never be treated that way.”

    Cantor, like Pence, spoke to conservative irritation at an aggressive campaign by official Democratic committees and by organizations like Media Matters Action to publicize — and get Republicans on the record about — reports of violence. That subject occupied Rush Limbaugh for more than half of his Thursday broadcast, during which the conservative host told listeners that they “need to stop being defensive about this and turn it right back” onto Democrats.

    “When we have a terrorist attack,” said Limbaugh, “the Democrats always ask: What did we do to deserve this? Have you heard any of the Democrats ask this about something they imposed on us?” At multiple points, he called the health care bill “the real death threat” and intimated that Democrats had faked both the Saturday slurs and the week of attacks on Democrats. “They have to invent this narrative of violence against them for their own well-being.”

    Limbaugh echoed some of the “give me a break” criticism of other conservatives, who had refused to accept the framing of the event provided by the mainstream media. Cantor’s press conference provided an opening for some to go after the tactics of Democrats, blaming them for hype.

    “‘I’m getting death threats’ has become a tired meme in the American media,” wrote blogger Ed Morrissey at HotAir.com, “and a handy way for politicians to avoid the responsible accountability that mainstream Americans demand. And it’s not just Democrats who have indulged in that avoidance strategy in the past, although they’re certainly the culprits of the moment.”

    “When,” joked blogger Jim Treacher at the Daily Caller website, “will the Democrats stand up and condemn this act of violence they caused?”

    But other conservatives went beyond the Republican line, arguing that the Democrats got what was coming to them. In an e-mail to his America’s Values supporters, Gary Bauer soft-peddled the Saturday slur story by noting that “these liberals chose to walk through the upset protestors in the hopes, I suspect, of provoking an incident.”

    “After years of falsely characterizing former President Bush as a tyrant,” wrote blogger Dan Riehl, “they’ve let slip the mask and America can see with their own eyes who the real tyrants are… [D]on’t expect us to feel sorry for you, or respect you for the wrath you’re now faced with confronting. That may be the only thing you actually deserve for the unjust and un-democratic way in which you’ve comported yourselves throughout this entire charade.”

    Conservative anger at the coverage extended to the perceived double standard. Once again, they argued, attacks on Democrats were taken as gospel before rigorous fact-checking; once again, alleged attacks by conservatives were taken more seriously than attacks by the left.

    “I wonder,” asked Limbaugh, “if all of those AIG executives whose mansions were surrounded by ACORN and SEIU activists — bussed in activists — got any death threats?”

    Steinhauser, who appeared on Fox News Thursday to discuss the double standard, told TWI that it was fair to question why the media didn’t flood the zone on coverage of a September 11, 2009 bomb threat received by FreedomWorks, or by attacks from unions.

    “There wasn’t this sort of outcry about what the SEIU was doing at town halls,” said Steinhauser. “If you want to take it back to the 20th century, the left has more to condemn than the right does. My goodness, look at what happened with the 1968 Democratic National Convention! Look at the radical elements of the environmental movement. Look at Bill Ayers — this guy was a member of radical group who said and did awful things. He helped launch Barack Obama’s political career, he’s part of the mainstream Left again, and there’s barely a word about it.”

  • The Cantor Police Report

    His office sent it to reporters — it’s worth a read.

    Richmond Police Investigate Cantor Building Vandalism

    March 25, 2010

    The Richmond Police Department is investigating an act of vandalism at the Reagan Building, 25 E. Main St., Richmond, Virginia.  A first floor window was struck by a bullet at approximately 1 a.m. on Tuesday, March 23.  The building, which has several tenants including an office used by Congressman Eric Cantor, was unoccupied at the time.

    A Richmond Police detective was assigned to the case.  A preliminary investigation shows that a bullet was fired into the air and struck the window in a downward direction, landing on the floor about a foot from the window.  The round struck with enough force to break the windowpane but did not penetrate the window blinds.  There was no other damage to the room, which is used occasionally for meetings by the congressman.

    The Richmond Police Department is sharing information about the incident with appropriate law enforcement agencies.

  • David Frum Leaves AEI

    The iconoclastic conservative, who’d spent the past week attacking the way that GOP lost the health care fight, says his departure came after being asked to give up his salary. That’s not how a busy population of readers have interpreted it so far.

  • Tea Party Groups Purge Nevada ‘Tea Party’ Candidate, on TV

    This ad from Tea Party Express is the hardest punch yet from a conservative coalition trying to poison the well for Scott Ashjian, the businessman running as the “Tea Party candidate” against Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.).

  • Democrats Keep Up the ‘Fanning the Flames’ Attack on GOP

    Doug Thornell, spokesman for Rep. Chris Van Hollen, fires back at Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.) for the GOP whip’s remarks about Democrats “fanning the flames” over health care.

    Yesterday, Congressman Van Hollen called upon Republican leaders to condemn the harsh rhetoric that is fanning the flames of extremism around the country.  Today, Mr. Cantor had the opportunity to join Mr. Van Hollen in calling for restraint.  Instead, he chose to use his press conference to level false accusations.  This is straight out of the Republicans’ political playbook of deflecting responsibility and distracting attention away from a serious issue.

    I’m told Cantor is not, as reported/promised, appearing on a right-wing conference call on the theme of “stopping Obama tyranny” today.

  • ‘Break Their Windows. Break Them Now.’

    I think Mike Vanderboegh will end up making a lot of trouble for Tea Parties with this off-the-rails blog post calling, many times over, for violence against members of Congress. Vanderboegh basically courts controversy — his blog profile tells readers how to send him anthrax and death threats — but as Democrats make hay from attacks on congressional offices, this blog post might become a sort of Rosetta Stone of wingnuttery.

    “If you agree with this message,” writes Vanderboegh, “spread it far and wide. The night is coming, and there are many windows to break.”

    The post:

    To all modern Sons of Liberty: THIS is your time. Break their windows. Break them NOW.

    Sons of Liberty burn and sack the house of the Massachusetts lieutenant governor, Thomas Hutchinson.

    To all free Americans who still hold dear the Founders’ vision of a constitutional Republic and who wish to remain free –

    Nancy Pelosi’s Intolerable Act is within days of passage by devious means so corrupt and twisted that even members of her own party recoil in disgust.

    This act will order all of us to play or pay, and if we do not wish to, we will be fined.

    If we refuse to pay the fine out of principle, we will be jailed.

    If we resist arrest, we will be killed.

    They will send the Internal Revenue Service and other federal police to do this in thousands of small Wacos, if that is what it takes to force us to submit.

    This arrogant elite pretends that this oppression is for our own good, while everyone else understands that this is about their selfish, insatiable appetite for control over our liberty, our money, our property and our lives.

    The majority of the people have made it plain that they do not want this tyrannical transfer of power wrapped in soft lies.

    It does not matter.

    Pelosi and her ilk apparently do not understand that this Intolerable Act has some folks so angry that they are ready to resist their slow-rolling revolution against the Founders’ Republic by force of arms. Why should they? For in the past seventy-five years of being pushed back continually from the free exercise of our God-given rights to life, liberty and property, WE HAVE NEVER SHOVED BACK. Rather, it was we, the law-abiding, who backed up each time, grumbling.

    These are collectivists. They do not hear you grumble. They do not, it is apparent after the past year of town halls and Tea Parties and nose-diving opinion polls, hear you SHOUT. They certainly do not hear the soft “snik-snik” of cleaning rods being used on millions of rifle barrels in this country by people who have decided that their backs are to the wall, politics and the courts no longer are sufficient to the task of defending their liberties, and they must make their own arrangements.

    The Imperial Democrats do not care what you think. They will not hear you. They are every bit as arrogant and isolated as King George the Third was from the liberty-loving American colonists in 1775.

    And yet, if we are to avoid civil war, we must get their attention BEFORE the IRS thug parties descend upon us each in turn — when we will be forced into dozens of defensive slaughters and then, to end it, forced yet again to call Pelosi and the other architects of this war upon their own people to final account.

    We are the law-abiding of this country, yes. We always have been. But when the “law” is distorted and twisted into an unconstitutional means of oppression, backed by the entire weight of the federal Leviathan, it is not “law” at all, but mere illegitimate force.

    John Locke said it best:

    “Whenever the legislators endeavor to take away and destroy the property of the people, or to reduce them to slavery under arbitrary power, they put themselves into a state of war with the people, who are thereupon absolved from any further obedience.”

    When the law becomes a deadly tool of tyranny, it is no longer a good thing to be obedient and “law-abiding.” It is, in fact, suicidal.

    Yet, given the federal mandarins’ willful ignorance of our very existence and conviction that we have no opinions that they are bound to respect, is there anything that can be done to prevent civil war?

    Yes, there is.

    We can emulate the Sons of Liberty of old.

    We can break their windows.

    These windows are not far away from where you are reading this right now. In virtually every city and county in this land, there is a local headquarters of Pelosi’s party — the Democrat party. These headquarters invariably have windows. When the Sons of Liberty wanted to express their opposition to the actions of the King’s ministers, they would gather in front of the homes and offices of his tax-collectors and government officials in Boston or New York and break their windows. Glass was expensive. The King’s minions were often the most well-to-do. The Sons of Liberty hit them in their pocketbooks.

    Most importantly, however, was the message to the royal functionaries that there are personal consequences for oppressing your fellow citizens. The King is far away, and you are here, among us, the people.

    This is the message that modern Sons of Liberty should get across to the Royalists of today. Now. Before we have to resort to rifles to resist their “well intentioned” tyranny.

    This is not to say that the GOP (I refuse to call them “Republicans” for that is a misuse of the word) does not bear a large measure of responsibility for the situation we find ourselves in today. However, they have opposed this Intolerable Act. Yet, if we do a thorough job of breaking Democrat windows, I am sure that the GOP will profit from the example.

    So, if you wish to send a message that Pelosi and her party cannot fail to hear, break their windows.

    Break them NOW.

    Break them and run to break again. Break them under cover of night. Break them in broad daylight. Break them and await arrest in willful, principled civil disobedience. Break them with rocks. Break them with slingshots. Break them with baseball bats.

    But BREAK THEM.

    The time has come to take your life, your liberty and that of your children and grandchildren into your own two hands and ACT.

    It is, after all, more humane than shooting them in self defense.

    And if we do a proper job, if we break the windows of hundreds, thousands, of Democrat party headquarters across this country, we might just wake up enough of them to make defending ourselves at the muzzle of a rifle unnecessary.

    Sons of Liberty, this is your time.

    Break their windows.

    Break them NOW.

    And Nancy, if this be sedition, if this be treason in your eyes, then make the most of it.

    Mike Vanderboegh
    PO Box 926
    Pinson, AL 35126
    [email protected]
    http://sipseystreetirregulars.blogspot.com

    If you agree with this message, spread it far and wide. The night is coming, and there are many windows to break. We’ll need all the help we can muster.
    LATER: There are those who feel that I have crossed a Rubicon here, and perhaps I have. I can only say that while wading the river, I met Nancy and her fellow jackasses coming the other way. I rather suspect they will make the opposite bank first. — MBV

  • [UPDATED] After Accusing Democrats of ‘Fanning Flames,’ Cantor to Appear on ‘S.T.O.P. Obama Tyranny’ Conference Call

    [UPDATE: Cantor did not appear on the call, with Rev. Rick Scarborough telling participants he was busy with “a vote on the floor.”]

    Three hours after airing his “deep concerns that some, DCCC Chairman Chris Van Hollen and DNC Chairman Tim Kaine in particular, are dangerously fanning the flames” of violence against Congress, Rep. Eric Cantor (R-Va.) will be the special guest on a conference call held by the “S.T.O.P. Obama Tyranny National Coalition,” a project of one of the numerous conservative groups to get off the ground since last year. The logo, from the press release:

    ericcantor

    Over the course of the year, words like “tyranny” and “totalitarian” have lost some of their punch from overuse on the right. Cantor, according to the release, “will discuss what to do now that the healthcare bill has passed.”

  • Georgia Governor Will Appoint ‘Special Attorney General’ to Sue Over Health Care

    Georgia Attorney General Thurbert Baker, a Democrat, has refused to file an anti-health care mandate lawsuit, and called other AGs’ decisions to do so “political gamesmanship.” Undaunted — and, of course, very concerned about the rule of law — Gov. Sonny Perdue (R-Ga.) is appointing a “special attorney general” to sue the federal government anyway.

    The governor said the state constitution gives him the leeway to appoint a special attorney general if the elected attorney general fails to carry out the wishes of the governor… When asked if Baker broke the law by refusing to carry out his instructions to initiate a lawsuit, the governor said,  “I think the (state) Constitution is is clear. I think the people of Georgia can make their own determination about that.”

    Perdue’s referring to the voters, I think — Baker is running for governor — but that’s really something to accuse your attorney general of.

  • Pence: Coverage of Health Care Blowback is ‘Smearing’ Conservatives

    Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.) becomes, I think, the first member of Congress to join Tea Party activists in pushing back against one of the big narratives of the week — the ramped-up violence and threats against members of Congress who backed health care reform.

    “I also rise to condemn the efforts to smear millions of law-abiding Americans who oppose ObamaCare by associating them and their principled opposition with these criminal acts,” said Pence. “The American people have every right to oppose this government takeover of health care without being lumped in with bigots and vandals by liberals in Congress and in the mainstream press. I say to my countrymen: End the threats, end the vandalism. And let’s also end the smears of law-abiding citizens exercising their first amendment right to speech and peaceable assembly.”

    Pence is the third-ranking member of the GOP’s House leadership.

  • Glenn Beck’s Chalkboard Is Trapped in the Closet

    I noticed, on a visit to the offices of Americans for Tax Reform, that the chalkboard Glenn Beck gave to the American Conservative Union during CPAC was nowhere to be seen. (ACU’s David Keene had pledged to display it prominently at Grover Norquist’s weekly meeting of conservatives.) Nikki Schwab and Tara Palmeri ferret out the chalkboard’s location:

    There was a grand unveiling ceremony the Wednesday following Beck’s appearance at CPAC. But since its unveiling, the board has yet to be used. Apparently, it got in the way of speakers who use microphones and PowerPoint slides to make their point.

    “We haven’t gotten to the technology where we can use the chalkboard yet,” ATR Communications Director John Kartch told Yeas & Nays. “We’re not advanced enough for that yet.”

    While ATR moved to a larger office in late 2008, and the new meeting room is fairly spacious, the Wednesday meetings are inevitably too crowded to make room for something as big as this.
  • Petraeus: ‘I Will Not, Ever, Run for Political Office’

    Phil Klein has the ultra-Shermanesque statement (which cites Sherman!), made in New Hampshire last night by the Centcom commander:

    I thought I’d said no about as many ways as I could. I really do mean no. We have all these artful ways of doing it. I’ve tried Shermanesque responses, which everybody goes and finds out what Sherman said was pretty unequivocally no. I’ve done several different ways. I’ve tried quoting the country song, ‘What Part of No Don’t You Understand?’ I mean, I really do mean that. I feel very privileged to be able to serve our country. I’m honored to continue to do that as long as I can contribute, but I will not, ever, run for political office, I can assure you. And again, we have said that repeatedly and I’m hoping that people realize at a certain point you say it so many times that you could never flip, and start your career by flip-flopping into it.

  • Conservatives Push Back on ‘Coffin Left in Congressman’s Yard’ Story

    All week I’ve been noticing pushback from conservatives on stories about angry threats to members of Congress who voted for health care reform, but nothing quite as intense as the response to Politico for reporting that “a coffin was placed on a Missouri Democrat’s lawn, another in a string of incidents against lawmakers after their vote Sunday on a health care overhaul.”

    Jim Hoft, the St. Louis-based “Gateway Pundit” blogger who appeared at the rally, explains: Tea Partiers held a peaceful vigil with a coffin “to represent the millions of Americans who will suffer from inadequate treatment and perish under Obamacare.” It wasn’t a threat at all, and the coffin wasn’t left on Russ Carnahan’s lawn.

    “There is nothing the democratic-media complex will not do to lie about the tea party patriots,” writes Hoft, “or to prop up these horrid leftists who are transforming our country into some kind of quasi-socialist state.”

  • ‘Listen Up, Buckwheat’

    File this under news stories that would be a whole lot more damaging if the culprits were not themselves African-American.

    Corey Poitier, who is running for U.S. Rep. Kendrick Meek’s seat, delivered a passionate speech against the health care reform bill Monday night to Broward County Republicans. During the speech, Poitier addressed the President by saying ‘Listen up, Buckwheat…’

    “I wasn’t meaning him any harm. Maybe it was a little insensitive,” Poitier said. “It’s a term that my brother and I use. It was kind of a way of saying, ‘dummy,’ like when I say to my brother, ‘Hey, Buckwheat, cut that out.’ That’s what it was.”

  • One More Time on James O’Keefe

    Patterico brings to my attention this argument from blogger Brad Friedman:

    [I]n mid-February of this year, after we’d called out O’Keefe as a liar for misrepresenting himself, Giles admitted to Washington Independent reporter Dave Weigel that the “pimp” concept was added-on with footage that was shot later and edited in. The “gaudy” costume seen in the videos was meant to convey “the whoring out of the American people,” she told him Weigel [sic].

    “We never claimed that he went in with a pimp costume,” Giles admitted, “that was b-roll. It was purely b-roll. He was a pimp, I was a prostitute, and we were walking in front of government buildings to show how the government was whoring out the American people.”

    In other words, as Giles admitted, and as O’Keefe’s own unauthenticated text-transcripts show, the entire “pimp” concept was added on as an afterthought, and edited in later.

    In two words: Uh, no. The pimp costume was added as an afterthought, and O’Keefe screwed up in the media blitz after the tapes were released by not correcting the impression that he wore the crazy costume inside ACORN offices. But the videos and transcripts clearly show O’Keefe and Giles seeking extra-legal advice on how to hide prostitution profits from the IRS.

  • Arkansas U.S. Senate Candidate: ‘I Don’t Know Where the President Was Born’

    One reason that Republicans are happy to have recruited Rep. John Boozman (R-Ark.) to run against Sen. Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.) — the odds of a primary win by Republican Curtis Coleman have declined considerably. Coleman talks to the Tolbert Report blog:

    Absolutely, the President must produce his birth certificate. I will find out what steps are available to require him to do so, and will take those steps aggressively and unrelentingly. I don’t know where the President was born, which is a matter of immense concern and Constitutional issue for all Americans. If he has nothing of consequence to hide, then there’s no acceptable reason not to have full disclosure.

    The “I don’t know where the president was born” part prevents this one from being a case of a candidate just slipping up.

  • Cheney Intervenes in Kentucky Senate Race

    Aaron Blake has the news — shortly after Dick Cheney’s former aides began drumming up opposition to Kentucky U.S. Senate candidate Rand Paul, Cheney has now endorsed Paul’s opponent, Trey Grayson. Cheney:

    I’m a lifelong conservative, and I can tell the real thing when I see it. I have looked at the records of both candidates in the race, and it is clear to me that Trey Grayson is right on the issues that matter – both on fiscal responsibility and on national security.

    Worth remembering: in the Texas gubernatorial primary, Cheney endorsed Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison (R-Texas) while Sarah Palin endorsed the winner, Gov. Rick Perry (R-Texas). Palin, famously, has endorsed Rand Paul.

  • GOP Rep: Sure, Tea Partiers Were Rowdy, But So Was Michael Moore

    An amusing, rubber-and-glue comment from Rep. Greg Walden (R-Ore.) in a perceptive Glenn Thrush and Marin Cogan piece (one of several from the past 72 hours) about blowback from the tone of the GOP’s defeat on health care reform:

    When the CodePinkers and [Michael] Moore et al. were up here, you should’ve heard some of the things they were saying. At any time there is a heated public debate, people say things they shouldn’t say. We don’t condone it. … It wasn’t appropriate then, and it wasn’t appropriate now.

    For what it’s worth, while Code Pink activists were generally allowed to stay in committee rooms when they held up slogans and signs — making for amusing wire photos — they were regularly kicked out of the rooms when they made noise, as in this 2007 instance:

    That’s a pretty far cry from this weekend’s Republican display that saw members holding up signs encouraging protesters outside of the Capitol, and even applauding a heckler who made it into the House gallery.

  • DeMint, Graham Prodded State A.G. to Investigate Health Care Reform Lawsuit

    An interesting scoop from NRO’s Stephen Spruiell, who reports that the movement to repeal health care reform through federal lawsuits began with GOP Sens. Jim DeMint and Lindsey Graham, both of South Carolina. Quoting Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott:

    The conversation really began in December when the two U.S. senators from South Carolina contacted their attorney general, [Henry] McMaster, about the Nebraska compromise, raising legal concerns about that. General McMaster assembled a group of attorneys general, including myself, and we all signed a letter that was sent to Speaker Pelosi and Leader Reid outlining our concerns about the constitutionality of the Nebraska compromise.

    After that, I received a request from the two U.S. senators from Texas asking additional questions about other constitutional concerns about the health-care bill, including questions about the individual mandate.

    A sometime-forgotten fact — the original rumblings about lawsuits centered on the constitutionality of last-minute deals with specific senators. With those deals likely to be stripped out of the final bill, the focus moved, immediately, to the mandate — the constitutional case against which might not be so strong.