Author: David Weigel

  • RNC Blacks Out ‘Paid for by RNC’ Line on Tea Party Signs

    Last week, the “Take the Town Halls to D.C.” campaign got a small amount of negative attention for “LISTEN TO ME!” signs being distributed to activists by the Republican National Committee. I stopped by the Take the Town Halls HQ today and saw the RNC’s solution. Here are the old signs:

    IMG_2977

    Note the language at the bottom identifying the RNC as the maker of the sign. But today, the “LISTEN TO ME!” signs — a stack of them were underneath a 2005 Bush-Cheney inauguration bag — looked like this.

    From afar, those blackish stickers fully obscure the RNC label.

  • Court to Orly Taitz: Pay Your $20,000 Sanction

    The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals affirms, as expected, the decision of a lower court to fine birther lawyer Orly Taitz $20,000 for her conduct in a lawsuit on behalf of Capt. Connie Rhodes.

    “We have fully considered Taitz’s arguments,” the court finds. “We find them unpersuasive and therefore affirm the district court’s sanctions judgment.”

    Taitz is currently a candidate for the GOP nomination for secretary of state in California.

  • Being Made Fun Of = Winning!

    Carly Fiorina’s Senate campaign, which made sure reporters checked out the truly strange “Boxer Blimp” web video over the weekend, fires off a press release declaring mission accomplished.

    Here, from the press release, is the list of accolades.

    Movie “Takes Boxer To Task For Her Record In The Senate.” “This latest offering, which is already being dubbed the “Boxer Blimp,” takes Boxer to task for her record in the Senate. California Republicans say that is something that has been little examined in the course of previous campaigns, but which is essential to highlight in a year where the three-term Senator’s approval ratings are lagging while California’s economy remains on proverbial life support.” (“Carly Fiorina Slams Boxer in New, Outrageous Video,” BigGovernment, 3/13/10)

    Ad Features Compare-And-Contrast With “trademark humor.” “The ad for GOP Senate hopeful Carly Fiorina features plenty of creator Fred Davis’ trademark humor.” (Mark Barabak, “Demon Sheep creator strikes again,” Los Angeles Times, 11/13/10)

    Hot Air “Another Memorable Spot.” “The quirky political ad man who produced those two cult classics has introduced another memorable spot…The whole spot is bizarre to the point of hilarity – which, it should be noted, is by design.” (Sam Stein, “Demon Sheep Ad Man Strikes Again, Morphs Boxer Into A Blimp,” The Huffington Post, 11/13/10)

    Fiorina Portrayed As “The Only Republican To Emerge In 18 Years Who Can Deflate The Blimp.”“Titled ‘Hot Air,’ the movie depicts Democrat Boxer as a blimp that floats from Washington, D.C. to California advocating a larger role for the federal government and a variety of tax increases. The movie portrays Fiorina as the only Republican to emerge in 18 years who can deflate the blimp.” (Michael McGuire, “Carly Fiorina debuts ‘Hot Air’ movie at GOP convention,” Examiner, 3/13/10)

    Fiorina Unveils “New, Mad Genius Video.” “Taking full advantage of her scheduled time on the convention program, Team Carly essentially relaunched her campaign, with a production that included music by Van Halen, a free-swinging speech delivered by the candidate channeling Miss Scarlet, and a new, mad genius video by gonzo media consultant Fred Davis.” (“GOP Extra II: New Boffo Hit By Demon Sheep Auteur,” Calbuzz, 3/13/10)

    Hot Air The “Highlight” Of Fiorina’s Speech. “All the fiery rhetoric aside, and notwithstanding the full ear blast of Van Halen’s ‘Jump’ which closed the Hurricane’s star turn, the highlight of her coming out act was ‘Hot Air: The Movie.’” (“GOP Extra II: New Boffo Hit By Demon Sheep Auteur,” Calbuzz, 3/13/10)

    Boxer Depicted “As Enamored With Her Own Image And Out Of Touch With Californians.” “[Fiorina] introduced herself to the state’s GOP convention Saturday with a campaign movie called Hot Air, which depicts the three-term Boxer as enamored with her own image and out of touch with Californians.” (Kevin Freking, “Fiorina assails Washington, Boxer as out of touch,” Associated Press, 3/13/10)

    Movie “Boost[s] Fiorina’s Image As A Business Leader.” “The short movie also attempts to boost Fiorina’s image as a business leader who led Hewlett-Packard through difficult economic times.” (Kevin Freking, “Fiorina assails Washington, Boxer as out of touch,” Associated Press, 3/13/10)

    “Fiorina’s Fantastical Short Reflected A Willingness To Display Some Eccentricity In A Tough Primary Battle Against Campbell And Assemblyman Chuck DeVore.” (Michael Rothfeld, “State Republican delegates see a new ‘bizarre’ video, and hear another ex-CEO,” Los Angeles Times, 3/13/10)

    Video Shows Fiorina Thinks Outside The Box. “The point of a web video is to make people talk about the ad. While you can criticize the weirdness of the ad, Fiorina’s team gets points for thinking outside the box and sticking the their guns after to much criticism of their previous video.” (Aaron Blake, “From Demon Sheep to Hindenboxer,” The Hill, 3/13/10)

    Video “Created The Steamiest Buzz” Of CRP. “The anti-Boxer ad created the steamiest buzz at the three-day convention.” (Ken McLaughlin, “After Success Of ‘Demon Sheep’ Ad, Fiorina’s New Ad Slams Barbara Boxer,” San Jose Mercury News, 3/13/10)

    San Jose Mercury News: The Movie “Immediately Went Viral…” “The nearly eight-minute demon blimp ad, which immediately went viral on YouTube, was unveiled Saturday at the California Republican Party’s convention in Santa Clara. It’s the latest Internet commercial from the campaign of U.S. Senate candidate Carly Fiorina, whose first ad portrayed Tom Campbell as a evil-eyed sheep, ‘fiscal conservative in name only.’” (Ken McLaughlin, “After Success Of ‘Demon Sheep’ Ad, Fiorina’s New Ad Slams Barbara Boxer,” San Jose Mercury News, 3/13/10)

    Movie A “Clear Show-Stopper.” “It wasn’t exactly “Demon Sheep II’ but the release of a new Carly Fiorina spot depicting Democratic U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer as a dirigible full of hot air was the clear show-stopper of the state GOP convention this weekend in Santa Clara.” (Carla Marinucci, “Anti-Barbara ‘Hindenboxer’ ad joins ‘Demon Sheep’ in Fiorina’s U.S. Senate arsenal,” San Francisco Chronicle, 3/13/10)

    Ad Creates “Buzz” At CRP. “Carly Fiorina released the eight minute glitzy ad during a lunchtime speech in Santa Clara that got her that intangible and yet always sought after thing called ‘buzz.’” (Lori Prueitt, “Carly Gets Convention’s ‘Buzz’ Moment,” NBC Bay Area, 3/15/10)

  • DeMint: If Obama Is ‘Successful’ on Health Care, ‘It Will Give Him Some Boldness to Go Back to Other Programs’

    In a fairly muted online Q&A with Florida U.S. Senate candidate Marco Rubio — questions were along the lines of “what can we do to stop this health care takeover?” — Sen. Jim DeMint (R-S.C.) let the cat out of the bag on the possible effect of a Democratic victory on health care reform.

    “If the president is successful,” said DeMint, answering a question about the prospects for cap-and-trade, “I think it will give him some boldness to go back to other programs.”

    DeMint, of course, spent some time as the public face of opposition to health care reform after predicting the debate over it would become Obama’s “Waterloo.” If he sounds more pessimistic now, he also reassured his online audience that the Democrats lacked 50 votes for reconciliation and that “the Senate is not going to fix the bill the way they like it.”

    Rubio, whom DeMint confidently called the “next senator,” stuck largely to donation appeals and punted on policy questions — he suggested that we’d have been better off had the stimulus failed but Congress passed “some of the alternatives that were floated at the time,” without really getting into what those alternatives were.

    DeMint’s eventual answer on energy legislation, by the way, was: “I think the cold weather has been our best friend when it comes to this cap-and-trade scheme.”

  • InTrade, Betting on ‘Obamacare’

    The online betting site — with a record on these matters slightly better than that of the average political pundit — is seeing a big surge in “Obamacare to become law before June 30″ stocks.

    Picture 5

    Bets bottomed out after the Scott Brown victory, and have been moving up since the start of this month.

  • Virginia Attorney General: Obama Birth in Kenya ‘Doesn’t Seem Beyond the Realm of Possibility’

    One reason that attacks on his master thesis didn’t really damage Gov. Bob McDonnell’s (R-Va.) 2009 campaign was that his record as state attorney general was marked more by nuts-and-bolts accomplishments than by any noticeable right-wing crusade. New Attorney General Ken Cuccinelli has not really followed that playbook. Fresh off a controversy surrounding his attempted rollback of anti-discrimination policy for gays, Cuccinelli — who pulled out of a CPAC event when a “birther” figure was included — is caught on tape discussing the possible strategies for a challenge to President Barack Obama’s eligibility.

    Q What can we do about Obama and the birth certificate thing?

    CUCCINELLI: It will get tested in my view when someone… when he signs a law, and someone is convicted of violating it and one of their defenses will be it is not a law because someone qualified to be President didn’t sign it.

    Q: Is that something you can do as Attorney General? Can you do that or something?

    CUCCINELLI: Well only if there is a conflict where we are suing the federal government for a law they’ve passed. So it’s possible.

    Q: Because we are talking about the possibility that he was not born in America.

    CUCCINELLI: Right. But at the same time under Rule 11, Federal Rule 11, we gotta have proof of it.

    Q: How can we get proof?

    CUCCINELLI: Well… that’s a good question. Not one I’ve thought a lot about because it hasn’t been part of my campaign. Someone is going to have to come forward with nailed down testimony that he was born in place B, wherever that is. You know, the speculation is Kenya. And that doesn’t seem beyond the realm of possibility.

  • Bachmann: ‘Whether or Not You Believe in a Conspiracy to Drive Eric Massa Out of Congress’

    I don’t sneer and point at everything Rep. Michele Bachmann (R-Minn.) says — she clearly courts such a reaction every day — but Ed Morrissey’s video of Bachmann at an anti-health care reform rally in Minneapolis is pretty amazing for the quantity of smears she packs in. Democrats, she says, “considered holding up [Scott] Brown’s seating until public outrage forced them to back down.” In reality, Democrats pushed up the date of Brown’s seating up a week after he asked them to. President Obama, she says, offered Scott Matheson a judicial appointment right before his brother, Rep. Tim Matheson (D-Utah), arrived at the White House. But Scott Matheson was being evaluated for the post in January.

    Bachmann’s juiciest accusation — and the one about which we know the least — concerns Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi. “The real story about Massa is that it appears that Speaker Pelosi might have known about these sexual harassment allegations in October,” says Bachmann. “I’m not saying this is what is, but I’m saying this is what it looks like.”

    Well, here’s what Fox News has reported.

    Fox News has learned that Pelosi’s aides learned last October that Massa was living with male staffers and asked Massa’s office to change that. According to The Wall Street Journal, Massa’s former chief of staff also told Pelosi’s staff that Massa’s language and conduct made some aides uncomfortable.

    Based on that, Bachmann will inform a crowd that Nancy Pelosi covered up Massa’s behavior to twist his arm for a vote … that, well, she didn’t end up getting.

    This is a pretty high number of whoppers and innuendos from a member of Congress whom, according to Newt Gingrich, deserves a committee chairmanship.

    For more on Bachmann’s speech and her comparisons of President Obama to Hugo Chavez, see The Minnesota Independent’s coverage.

  • Playing the Slavery Card Against Harry Reid

    Floyd Brown, the man behind the 1988 Willie Horton ad (and now a conservative activist who’s on the board of the American Conservative Union) unleashes probably the strangest ad you’ll see hitting Sen. Harry Reid (D-Nev.). Keying off a brag that Reid made in one of his own ads — that he used his power to help casino tycoon James Murren build Las Vegas’s city center — Brown attacks Murren’s partner, Dubai’s prince Mohamed bin Rashid Al Maktoum, for using “slave labor” to build his city. The claim is sourced to CBS News and Human Rights Watch, but it could just be a vehicle to show voters the very Arabic visage of Al Maktoum.

    “Slave labor in Dubai. Union labor in Las Vegas. And both the slave bosses and the union bosses want Harry Reid re-elected!”

  • GOP Firm’s Tactics Sting Candidates

    The Base Connect office in Washington, D.C. (Photo by David Weigel)

    The Base Connect office in Washington, D.C. (Photo by David Weigel)

    Bill Russell couldn’t catch a break. He’d made his first run for Congress in 2008, as a Republican trying to take down Rep. John Murtha (D-Pa.), and winning broad support with grassroots conservatives. He’d lost that race by 16 points and kept on campaigning, eyes on the prize — until, on Feb. 8, 2010, Murtha died from complications related to gall bladder surgery. That forced a special election for May 19, and gave the power to choose a GOP nominee to a conference of local Republicans. On March 11 they met and handed the nomination to Tim Burns, a businessman making his first bid for office.

    Image by: Matt Mahurin

    Image by: Matt Mahurin

    Russell, speaking to TWI on March 12, explained his thinking on just how he’d lost. One factor was the “coercion” of Republican officials by the state party chairman, Rob Gleason. But another factor was a “whisper campaign” against Base Connect, the Washington, D.C. political firm that Russell has employed since 2008 for direct mail fundraising. While Base Connect paid for ads and polls in the district to show Republican voters backing Russell over Burns, the word went out from Burns supporters that the D.C. firm could not be trusted. (See Base Connect’s mailings for Russell here.)

    A few weeks before the candidate selection vote, in an interview with TWI, Gleason pointed to Russell’s high “burn rate” as a reason to be skeptical of his chances. A week later, influential political strategist and blogger Bill Pascoe accused Base Connect of “subprime fundraising” and “highway robbery.” The next day, Erick Erickson of RedState tweeted that hiring Base Connect could cost candidates support from his website; hours later, the influential blog endorsed Burns. If it wasn’t the key factor in denying Russell the nomination, it still struck the candidate as playing dirty pool.

    “There were certain people who were posing as journalists, like these guys from RedState, who were making a bid deal out of how I use Base Connect,” Russell told TWI. “Well, in the last ten days I netted $112,000. That’s after expenses. What they were attacking me on, and attacking Base Connect, on was baseless.”

    The episode has brought the spotlight back to Base Connect, a direct mail firm with millions of dollars in business and a persistent chorus of critics on the right and left.

    Inside of Base Connect, Russell’s setback was no surprise. The special election nomination might have been a poison pill anyway, as one internal poll showed any of the likely Democratic candidates trouncing Burns or Russell. But the fact that it had become an issue was upsetting. The same week that Russell lost, TPM Muckraker ran a story accusing Base Connect of “fleecing longshot candidates,” basing the charge on ugly 2008 stories about defeated Base Connect candidates and the current coverage of Russell. The panicked campaign of Rep. Joseph Cao (R-La.) scrambled, telling local reporters that it was cutting off business with Base Connect. According to Base Connect Chief Operating Officer Michael Centanni, the Cao campaign spoke too soon — Base Connect had just dropped another Cao mailer to more than 10,000 people, and at the beginning of April it would assess whether Cao was still able to benefit from its services.

    “What happened with Cao,” said Centanni, “is that our first piece of mail was a huge success. Then he voted for the health care bill, and the drop-off in donations was just massive.”

    In a conversation with TWI, Centanni had responses for all of the charges that have bedeviled the firm for three years, before and after the name change. (The change to “Base Connect” happened in 2009 — one staffer acknowledged that the bad press was one reason for the change, but Centanni said it was wholly the result of a “cease and desist” letter from the car company BMW.) Critics, said Centanni, simply don’t understand how direct mail works.

    “Some of these folks say, oh, they raised a million dollars and only got $250,000,” says Centanni. “Well, these candidates probably don’t have a way to replace that $250,000. Let’s look at Bill Russell. Twenty-year army veteran. Not a rich guy. He decides he’s going to run this race out of principle. We look at that race, and we’re of the opinion that it’s a bad thing to let incumbents go unchallenged.”

    The huge initial hauls help the candidates generate headlines about — to use Russell’s 2008 run as an example — how they raised $700,000 in a single quarter. That, says Centanni, lets them build more buzz.

    “Russell raises $700,000 and what happens? Michelle Malkin sees it and publishes an article: ‘This might be the guy to beat John Murtha.’ In the next 24-48 hours, $150,000 comes in online — which has a much lower cost. How is that possible without direct mail?”

    But the stories of the last month have emphasized the second act of those fundraising stories. When news outlets decide to dig into FEC records, and when they find out how much Base Connect and its components are being paid, the negative coverage starts to churn. That’s not fair, argues Centanni. First, if the cost-to-fundraising ratio of early mailings are high, the system is working. One Base Connect staffer argued that if you looked at the numbers in April, you would think the candidates were being fleeced; look again in October, and the money has rolled in for a serious ad campaign. Second, Base Connect doesn’t conceal the fact that its clients are billed for the services of several different components of the firm, based in the same suite of the same office building. The placard at Base Connect’s 15th Street headquarters informs visitors that they’ve arrived at Base Connect Inc, Century Data Systems Corp, and Legacy List Marketing Inc.

    “Every direct mail operation is the same,” says Centanni. “There is a creative agency — do you remember the show ‘Bewitched?’ Darren worked at a creative agency. That’s what Base Connect is. We’re the creative agency. The next piece of it is Legacy List — we get a book here, about the size of the Manhattan telephone book, with nothing but lists in it. We have lists that we market and lists that we mail.”

    The defeats of candidates like Russell, Centanni argues, doesn’t prove that the strategy isn’t working. They choose long-shots because they want everyone to be challenged. “Every other time he ran,” says Centanni, “Murtha was able to dip into his war chest and give that money to other candidates. He couldn’t do that in 2008.” Their high-profile candidates lost in years when, as he puts it, “everybody lost.”

    There’s a certain type of long-shot that Base Connect seeks out. To succeed in direct mail, the candidate needs either a hated opponent or a compelling narrative. That’s where the African-American candidates come in — and where some of Base Connect’s image problem also comes in. Two of Base Connect’s eight current clients — Florida’s Allen West and Alabama’s Les Phillip — are African-American. Appeals for previous African-American Base Connect clients like Ada Fisher and Deborah Honeycutt stressed the threat they posed to the African-American political establishment. But up to now, these candidates have been among Base Connect’s least successful. One strategist credited some of Honeycutt’s problems to a “blinged out” campaign that spent money unwisely. That doesn’t explain the low hit ratio of the Black Republican PAC, a Base Connect project that has crystallized this narrative to, so far, little impact. In 2008, the Black Republican PAC raised $1.3 million. By the end of the cycle, only $5000 had been given to black candidates. If that looks fishy, says Centanni, it’s another misunderstanding.

    “Black Republican PAC was a new organization for the 2008 cycle,” says Centanni. “And you know what? It might take two or three cycles for it to become a political PAC that becomes really effective. So what you need to look at is whether it’s becoming more effective each time.”

    Allen West — also a recipient of $1,000 from Black Republican PAC in 2008 — stands by his partnership with Base Connect. “It’s kind of like investing,” he told TWI, analyzing the high cost, eventual high return strategy. “If you’re a nervous nellie and you screw around with your investments early on, just because they’re not immediately gaining a lot, you can screw with your portfolio.”

    West also nailed down a reason why, despite some off-the-record attacks of the kind that helped Tim Burns, Base Connect endures its bad press. It’s got connections. West got a prime speaking slot at CPAC, right before Glenn Beck, through Base Connect’s President Kimberly Bellissimo. “They open the doors to influencers,” said West.

    Base Connect’s strategies also drew some support from Richard Viguerie, a pioneering Republican direct mail strategist who, at every point in his career, has faced the same criticism over the high cost of his work. (He doesn’t exactly conceal the mostly meaningless “gross” numbers, claiming on his web site to have raised “more than $7 billion” in the mail.)

    “I was roundly attacked in the 1960s and 1970s for what I was doing,” Viguerie told TWI. “All of the criticism stopped in a few hours on election night 1980. That’s when they stopped and said, a-hah! That’s what Viguerie’s been up to! Building these lists!”

    Centanni looks to similar vindication from what looks to be the first strong election cycle for Republicans since 2004.

    “People are going to take another look when Allen West wins,” he says. “Hopefully Allen will give us a little bit of credit.”

    Rachel Rose Hartman contributed research to this story.

  • Tea Party Signs, Sponsored by the RNC

    Alex Pappas reports:

    The Republican National Committee is paying for signs and political buttons used by Tea Party groups — despite widespread disagreement among the conservative, grassroots activists on whether the movement should work to elect candidates within the Republican party or steer clear from it.

    The items, paid for by the RNC, were on full display at a Friday press conference of Tea Party activists in Washington. At the afternoon event at the Capitol Hill Suites, activists in town for the “Take the Town Halls to Washington” project passed out the red-white-and-blue buttons and signs emblazoned with the words “Listen to Me!”

    Text at the bottom of the sign reads: “Paid for by the Republican National Committee.”

    The news comes in a report about the first push of the “Take the Town Halls” event, which has introduced a new conservative star: Dr. Milton Wolf. Who is he? I’ll let his Washington Times bio explain.
    Dr. Milton R. Wolf is a radiologist in Kansas. He is Barack Obama’s second cousin once removed. President Obama’s great-great grandfather, Thomas Creekmore McCurry, is Dr. Wolf’s great-grandfather. Dr. Wolf’s mother, Anna Margaret McCurry, was five years older than Mr. Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham. The two were childhood friends until the Dunhams moved from Kansas to Seattle in 1955.
    Wolf on Fox and Friends:
  • Family Research Council: Help Us Kill ObamaCare

    Here’s the flip side of Ben Smith’s report today on evangelicals and Tea Parties — direct mail from the social conservative Family Research Council that tees off on health care reform and delivers, by and large, a message that could appeal to anyone in the Tea Party Movement.

  • GOP Candidate in Hawaii: Social Security Privatization ‘Deserves Examination’

    Phil Klein talks to Charles Djou, the GOP candidate in the House district that includes Honolulu and looks unusually winnable thanks to an open primary that could split the votes of Democrats. Perhaps because of that, and because of the general confidence boost given to Republicans by Scott Brown’s win, Djou doesn’t talk like a candidate trying to win in a place that gave President Obama a 40-point victory.

    Asked about the type of measures he would support to fight the fiscal crisis, he mentioned earmark reform and a balanced budget amendment. In the abstract, he said he supported the idea of reining in entitlement spending, but was hesitant to discuss specifics. For instance, he said that President Bush had the right idea by addressing Social Security, and said the concept of voluntary personal accounts “deserves examination,” but wasn’t willing to say he supported a specific plan because he said that Democrats would take him out of context and attack him for wanting to destroy Social Security.

    So in what context would supporting the 2005 Bush effort on Social Security and “examination” of private accounts not let Democrats do that?

  • Poll: Specter Leads Sestak and Toomey

    The new Daily Kos/Research 2000 poll has Sen. Arlen Specter (D-Pa.) holding onto a lead in the Democratic primary against Rep. Joe Sestak (D-Pa.) and also leading Republican challenger Pat Toomey. Specter leads Toomey by 6 points, 47 to 41. That’s on the heels of a Quinnipiac poll that gave Specter a 7-point lead — although the polling average, which includes some incredibly good Toomey numbers, still shows the GOP candidate with a lead.

  • Obama on Trial!

    A friend passes on this flier, apparently being distributed in Harlem, for a week-long “trial” of the president of the United States sponsored by ATLAH Worldwide Church. The full title: “C.I.A. Columbia Obama: Sedition and Treason Trial.” The subject of the trial: the conspiracy theory that Barack Obama was a “C.I.A. operative” in 1981, and that he “supplied arms, logistics, and money” to the Mujahideen “using his Muslim background.”

    Background here. Rev. James David Manning is, arguably, the most amusing character in the Obama conspiracy underground — his big moment came when Drudge linked to a video of Manning blasting Obama as a “long-legged mack daddy,” but he really hasn’t slowed down.

    The event isn’t sponsored by Columbia University, despite what the flier implies.

  • Oh, the Social Conservatives and Tea Partiers Can Be Friends

    Ben Smith has a great write-up on something I’ve been talking about for a while: tension between the social conservative activists who provided the muscle for the Reagan/Bush Republican coalition and the Tea Party activists who, suddenly, have become the driving force of the party.

    It’s hard to get a handle on, because some of the tension is happening in high-level discussions among elite Republicans, while some — possibly less — is happening in local parties where newly active Tea Partiers are challenging the authority of social conservatives who’ve long dominated their local GOP. And it’s hard to assess how much tension there is because victory tends to build bridges. There was some Tea Party bitterness at the involvement of social conservatives — the Susan B. Anthony List, Generation Joshua — in Doug Hoffman’s NY-23 race, because Hoffman lost and activists wondered if voters rejected the “outsider” involvement. But when everyone teamed up for Scott Brown, and he won, voila — no tension.

    The biggest insight I see in this piece is that some social conservatives recoil at the Tea Parties’ “vitriolic attacks on Obama” — and while Tea Partiers bristle at the suggestion that they’re making ad hominem attacks, even the “Obama is enacting a century-old plot to destroy America” Glenn Beck-style rhetoric is too much for some social cons. Smith quotes Richard Land of the Southern Baptist Convention’s Ethics & Religious Liberty Commission:

    Obama, he said “provides a tremendously positive role model for tens of millions of African-American men” and “seems demonstrably fond of his wife and children, which is a positive role model for people of all ethnicities.”

    “I would want to be free to attack the character of President Clinton — but this guy, he gives every indication of being a decent guy,” Land said.

  • Steve King Wants You to Take the Town Halls to Washington

    Rep. Steve King (R-Iowa) records a promotional video for the “Take the Town Halls to DC” campaign, promising activists some more results for this bout of lobbying.

    “These members of Congress cannot reject you if you come here and look them in eye,” says King.

    To some extent, this round of activism is kabuki for the cameras — all of the action is inside the Democratic caucus as wavering members are convinced to vote for the Senate bill. The “town hall” theme is meant to remind members what they’ll face when they come to their districts, but if those raucous responses came as surprises last year, they’re pretty rote now.

  • Republicans Pick First-Time Candidate for Murtha Seat

    By a nearly 2-1 margin, Republican conferees chose first-time candidate and small businessman Tim Burns to run in the May 18 special election for the seat formerly held by John Murtha. Democrats earlier this week selected their nominee — Mark Critz, Murtha’s former district director — and like Republicans they face an awkward situation as the candidate Critz defeated plans to run for the full term as a candidate in the regularly scheduled primary. But the Republicans, having stiffed 2008 candidate Bill Russell, have a little more angst ahead of them.

  • Attacking ‘Paterson-Appointee Kirsten Gillibrand’

    One of the NRSC’s hardest potential targets in 2010 has been Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand (D-N.Y.): appointed in a bit of a mess by Gov. David Paterson (D-N.Y.), struggling to define her political identity, but incredibly adept at scaring potential opponents out of the race. The NRSC fires a shot across the bow today with a new sobriquet — “Paterson-Appointee Kirsten Gillibrand” — and what seems to be an attempt to spook her out of attacking possible candidate Dan Senor’s role as chief spokesperson for the Coalition Provisional Authority after the U.S. invasion of Iraq.

    I’ll just quote the NRSC’s spin:

    Before she was appointed to the Senate by Governor Paterson, Gillibrand broke with fellow Democrats in the House and voted with Republicans in supporting the war in Iraq. On May 24, 2007, for example, Gillibrand joined with Republicans in voting against the Democrat leadership for a bill to provide funding for U.S. efforts in Iraq without setting withdrawal deadlines for troops. In fact, of the five freshman Democrat Members of Congress from New York in 2007, Gillibrand was the only one to vote YES.

    The following year, Gillibrand also continued her support for funding the war in Iraq and on June 19, 2008, she once again broke with the Democrat leadership and joined with Republicans in helping to pass another Iraq funding measure.

    What’s even more notable about both votes to fund the war in Iraq? In both cases, Kirsten Gillibrand was the ONLY Democrat in the New York congressional delegation to vote with the Republicans in support of the war. In fact, Gillibrand’s votes in support of the Iraq war took place a full three years after Dan Senor left his position as CPA spokesman.

    Let’s just revisit the history here. For nearly four years, the United States pursued a strategy in Iraq that, everyone now realizes, was a disaster. Senor was part of the Bush administration and helped spin that strategy. After the 2006 midterm elections that sent Gillibrand to Congress, the Bush administration reshuffled its cards and launched the surge. Gillibrand — as the NRSC admits — bucked most Democrats and supported that strategy. So the strategy is to … attack her for supporting the tactics that worked? A bold prediction: This will not scare Gillibrand off of attacks on Senor’s resume.

  • The Next James O’Keefe Sting

    Noah Shachtman gets a look at it in his sprawling profile of Andrew Breitbart. The scene, from a meet-up between O’Keefe and Breitbart that Shachtman witnessed:

    This time, there are no prostitutes involved, just a shady, and serious, tax-fraud scheme. The ploy involves the Obama administration’s 10 percent tax credit to first-time home buyers. The law says that the credit maxes out at $8,000 for an $80,000 home. But at the Detroit office of the Department of Housing and Urban Development, the rule seems open to interpretation. O’Keefe asks a staffer, What if I bought a place for $50,000, but the seller and I agreed to write down $80,000 as the purchase price?

    “Flip it any way you want,” the staffer replies.

    What if the place is worth much less — like only $6,000?

    “Yup, you can do that.”

    O’Keefe and fellow activist Joe Basel ran the same sting at HUD’s Chicago office and at several federally supported independent housing groups. Breitbart paces the parquet floor. The video is damning but not exactly Acorn-explosive.

    Then O’Keefe stops the playback. “Oh yeah, I forgot,” he says. “We went to the Detroit Free Press, to the managing editor. We told her the whole thing. She said she wasn’t interested. Wanna see the tape?”

    Breitbart starts to cackle. Of course he wants to see the tape. Sleazy HUD administrators are important, sure. But media covering up sleaze? That’s entertainment. “Dude, that’s the most important part!” he says. “I have seepage coming out of five parts of my body right now.”

    Sopranos fans will remember a minor plotline like this, when Tony sought to make some money by flipping condemned housing.