Author: HL

  • Hawaii Budget Crisis: State Can’t Afford Congressional Election

    Hawaii Budget Crisis: State Can’t Afford Congressional Election
    HONOLULU — Cash-strapped Hawaii can’t afford to pay for an election to replace a congressman who is planning to step down next month to run…

    David Quigg: Contingency Plans For Revised Edition of “A Happier History of America” by Rudy Giuliani
    MEMORANDUM FROM: Rudy Giuliani, NYC mayor on 9/11/01 TO: Revisionist & Sons Publishing Co. RE: contingency plans for revised second edition of my forthcoming textbook,…

    Trita Parsi: Open Letter to Congressman Gresham Barrett on his plans to deport all Iranian visa holders
    Congressman Barrett, The National Iranian American Council and the Iranian-American community is outraged by your plan to reintroduce legislation mandating the deportation of thousands of…

  • Giuliani still in denial about Bush-era terror attacks

    Giuliani still in denial about Bush-era terror attacks

    After falsely claiming on Good Morning America that “[w]e had no domestic attacks under Bush,” Rudy Giuliani stated during CNN’s The Situation Room, “I did omit the words ’since September 11th.’ I apologize for that. I should have put it in.” However, Giuliani continued to ignore several domestic attacks that took place under Bush after 9/11 — including the 2002 attack at the Los Angeles International Airport, the 2002 DC-area sniper shootings, and the 2006 SUV attack at the University of North Carolina – and dismissed the 2001 anthrax attacks, which were characterized by John Ashcroft as “a terrorist act,” because, Giuliani said, “as far as we know, that was not done in the name of Islamic terrorism.”

    Giuliani now claiming “no major domestic attack under President Bush since September 11th”

    Giuliani: “I usually say we had no domestic attacks, no major domestic attack under President Bush since September 11th.” After falsely claiming on the January 8 edition of Good Morning America that “[w]e had no domestic attacks under Bush. We’ve had one under Obama,” Giuliani stated during The Situation Room, “I did omit the words ’since September 11th.’ I apologize for that. I should have put it in.” Giuliani later agreed with Wolf Blitzer’s statement that “you’re saying in terms of terror attacks since 9/11, there have been no — no terror attacks since 9/11 under President Bush, but one terror attack, Fort Hood, under President Obama,” provided that only “Islamic terror attacks” are counted.

    From the January 8 edition of CNN’s The Situation Room:

    BLITZER: All right. As you know, the blogosphere is going crazy with that, the comment, we had no domestic attacks under Bush.

    All right, you remember at least one, don’t you?

    GIULIANI: No, here — here’s what I usually say when I said that — and I did not put that — those words in. I said — I usually say we had no domestic attacks, no major domestic attack under President Bush since September 11th. And the reason I say it is, on September 11th and the days after September 11th, I received many briefings, many warnings, as the mayor of New York, that we were going to be attacked again, that we were going to be attacked frequently.

    And I think many people are surprised, even those people who hate President Bush — I think many people were surprised that we didn’t have those major attacks and that at least some of the things that President Bush was warning was helping in making certain that we didn’t have any kind of major terrorist attack.

    I did omit the words “since September 11th.” I apologize for that. I should have put it in. I do remember September 11th. In fact, Wolf, I remember it every single day and usually frequently during the day.

    […]

    BLITZER: So at — at this point, given what you’re — what you’re saying in terms of terror attacks since 9/11, there have been no — no terror attacks since 9/11 under President Bush, but one terror attack, Fort Hood, under President Obama…

    GIULIANI: Islamic…

    BLITZER: …President Obama. Islamic terror attacks…

    GIULIANI: Islamic terror attacks.

    BLITZER: Is that what you’re saying, zero to one, in effect?

    GIULIANI: Correct. And the o — the only reason I point that out is that the — the president himself has finally now come to the conclusion that he can say war on terror. I wish he would also describe it as Islamic terrorism so that we clearly define our enemy. And I wish he would follow through on our being at war with — with Islamic terrorism.

    Giuliani doesn’t count anthrax attacks, but State Department listed attacks among “Significant Terrorist Incidents”

    Giuliani: “There’s no — no proof” that anthrax attacks were “terrorist attack.”  From the January 8 edition of The Situation Room:

    BLITZER: There — there was at least one terror attack on U.S. Soil that happened after 9/11. I’m referring to the anthrax attacks in New York and in elsewhere. What that a terror attack, do you believe?

    GIULIANI: Well, as far as I know, the FBI has never been able to figure out who did it and has never designated it as a terror attack. I mean, I lived through that. I — there was…

    BLITZER: But whoever was trying to do it was trying to terrorize a lot of people.

    GIULIANI: Yes, but that was not done in the name — as far as we know, that was not done in the name of Islamic terrorism any more than, you know, serial killers who…

    BLITZER: Right. It could have been a domestic terror attack, too, and we don’t know, as you correctly point out, who was responsible…

    GIULIANI: That’s right. So you’re — so…

    BLITZER: …for that anthrax attack.

    GIULIANI: …so you can’t — you can’t describe something as a terrorist attack if it hasn’t been investigated and there’s no — no proof. And the best thinking on the part of the FBI is that it wasn’t involved with Islamic terrorism.

    But, again, that’s pretty — we’re on pretty shaky grounds there because they’ve never been able to solve that.

    Ashcroft said of anthrax mailings: “[I]t’s a terrorist act.” A March 2004 State Department report on “Significant Terrorist Incidents, 1961-2003″ quotes then-Attorney General John Ashcroft saying of the letters containing anthrax mailed to various targets: “When people send anthrax through the mail to hurt people and invoke terror, it’s a terrorist act.” Five people were killed as a result of those letters in the autumn of 2001.

    FBI: Anthrax attacks were “worst act of bioterrorism in U.S. history.” On August 6, 2008, the FBI held a press conference about its investigation into the anthrax attacks, which U.S. Attorney Jeff Taylor characterized as “the worst act of bioterrorism in U.S. history.”

    Other domestic attacks took place under Bush

    2002 attack against El Al ticket counter at LAX. In July 2002, Hesham Mohamed Hadayet opened fire at an El Al Airlines ticket counter at Los Angeles International Airport killing two people and wounding four others before being shot dead. A 2004 Justice Department report stated that Hadayet’s case had been “officially designated as an act of international terrorism.”

    2002 DC-area sniper. The state of Virginia indicted Washington, D.C.-area sniper John Allen Muhammad — along with his accomplice, a minor at the time — on “an act of terrorism” for one of the murders he committed during a three-week shooting spree across Maryland, Virginia, and Washington, D.C. Muhammad was convicted, sentenced to death, and subsequently executed for the crime. Muhammad’s accomplice, Lee Malvo, reportedly testified that Muhammad had plans to “set up a camp to train children how to terrorize cities.”

    2006 UNC SUV attack. In March 2006, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill graduate Mohammed Reza Taheri-azar drove an SUV into an area of campus, striking nine pedestrians. According to reports, Taheri-azar said he acted because he wanted to “avenge the deaths or murders of Muslims around the world.” Taheri-azar also reportedly stated in a letter: “I was aiming to follow in the footsteps of one of my role models, Mohammad Atta, one of the 9/11/01 hijackers, who obtained a doctorate degree.”

    Other conservatives have downplayed terrorist attacks under Bush

    Frederick: All domestic terrorist attacks since 9-11 took place “on Obama’s watch.” As Media Matters for America documented, Las Vegas Review-Journal publisher Sherman Frederick wrote in a January 3 column that “the two cases of domestic terrorism since 9/11″ were “both on Obama’s watch.”

    Matalin downplays attacks under Bush, falsely claiming “Bush inherited” 9-11 attacks. On the December 27 edition of CNN’s State of the Union, Republican strategist Mary Matalin falsely claimed that Bush “inherited the most tragic attack on our own soil in our nation’s history.” In fact, the September 11, 2001, attacks occurred eight months into Bush’s presidency and more than a month after he had received a Presidential Daily Briefing titled, “Bin Laden Determined to Strike in U.S.”

    Perino: “We did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush’s term.” Bush White House Press Secretary Dana Perino falsely claimed on the November 24, 2009, edition of Fox News’ Hannity that “[w]e did not have a terrorist attack on our country during President Bush’s term.”

  • Emails: Fed Pressed AIG To Keep Bailout Details Under Wraps

    Emails: Fed Pressed AIG To Keep Bailout Details Under Wraps
    The New York Fed pressured AIG in late 2008 to withhold from the public details about its massive and controversial payments to counter-parties, according to emails obtained by Bloomberg News.

    Flight 253 Intel: What Did They Know And When Did They Know It?
    TPMmuckraker compiles what has been publicly reported about what U.S. government agencies knew about Abdulmutallab. One finding: the oft-repeated claim that Abdulmutallab bought a one-way ticket appears to be unsubstantiated, and in fact contradicted by at least two government sources.

    Presented By:

  • Dodd’s Gift to the Democrats

    Dodd’s Gift to the Democrats
    To read the esteemed New York Times reporters Zeleny and Nagourney this morning, you would think that the retirement of Chris Dodd was a major blow to the Democratic Senate majority, when in fact it was just the opposite. Not…


    New York TimesChris DoddDemocraticUnited States SenateChristopher Dodd

    The Difference Between Talking Tough and Acting Smart
    Rep. Rush Holt (D-NJ) is Chair of the Select Intelligence Oversight Panel. As we have seen since the attempted terrorist attack on Northwest Flight 253, there are those who never will understand the difference between talking tough and acting smart….


    TerrorismWarfare and ConflictWar on TerrorismSeptember 11 2001Yemen

    To My Conservative Friends (or ‘Dear Shadow Government’)
    Now is the political season of our disappointment. So many in the pundit class feeling let down after the high hopes of a year ago. Me too. You see, I actually believed in — and still hope for — the…


    ConservativePoliticsShadow GovernmentConservatismParties

  • Let The Cameras Roll

    Let The Cameras Roll
    Our guest blogger is John D. Podesta, President and CEO of the Center for American Progress Action Fund. My colleagues Igor Volsky and Matt Yglesias have eloquently argued on ThinkProgress that C-Span’s cameras should not be allowed to film the final negotiations between the House and Senate as they hammer out health care legislation that President […]

    Our guest blogger is John D. Podesta, President and CEO of the Center for American Progress Action Fund.

    PiccspanMy colleagues Igor Volsky and Matt Yglesias have eloquently argued on ThinkProgress that C-Span’s cameras should not be allowed to film the final negotiations between the House and Senate as they hammer out health care legislation that President Obama will soon sign into law. While I respect their arguments, I take a very different view. I have long believed that openness and transparency are essential bedrock measures for ensuring public accountability of our government. Letting C-Span cameras into health care conference meetings will keep negotiators honest, give the public an opportunity for input, and allow the process to be more collaborative.

    Open government and citizen access to information is a first principle of liberty in a democracy that has to be defended — even when it’s unpopular or deemed unhelpful in the short term. It is my experience that corruption in government begins at the moment when officials in power believe no one is paying attention. The scrutiny of traditional journalists, citizen journalists, and other interested Americans serves as a powerful disinfectant for our legislative process and restores confidence in our participatory democracy.

    Critics have argued that the presence of cameras is likely to produce political posturing and grandstanding by politicians. And indeed, with the cameras rolling, Republicans have said health care reform is a bigger threat than terrorism, claimed that seniors would be told to “drop dead,” and even called the President a liar. But I’m glad cameras were there to capture those demeaning comments. They have helped all Americans gain a better understanding of the unwillingness of some on the right to engage in a rational debate.

    The presence of cameras has also produced some beneficial outcomes. For instance, C-Span cameras exposed House GOP efforts to silence members of the Democratic Women’s Caucus when they tried to speak on the floor. The cameras also shamed Senate Republicans when they tried to filibuster the debate by forcing the reading of Sen. Bernie Sanders’ single-payer amendment.

    Democrats have nothing to fear from an open debate. They are working to expand affordable coverage to 31 million uninsured Americans, lowering premiums, ending the insurance industry’s denial of pre-existing conditions, and ensuring women will no longer be charged much more for the same coverage as men. When the House and Senate meet in the coming weeks to discuss this historic legislation, I would humbly urge them to let the cameras roll. We can handle the truth.

    Members of Congress should not forget that they are representing actual Americans who stand to be either benefited or harmed by the choices they make. It’s my view that if the American people are allowed to bear witness to the conference negotiations, the most important health care reform in decades will be stronger for it. And the American public will rightly feel that they helped bring it about.

    Right-Wing Radio Host Incensed That ?Butt Sniffer? Michael Steele Canceled Appearance On Her Show
    There was significant media speculation yesterday when embattled Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Michael Steele abruptly canceled a noon interview with ABC News. According to ABC’s Rick Klein, Steele backed out just 30 minutes before he was scheduled to talk to him. The RNC said that the scheduling conflict was because of a noon meeting […]

    There was significant media speculation yesterday when embattled Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Michael Steele abruptly canceled a noon interview with ABC News. According to ABC’s Rick Klein, Steele backed out just 30 minutes before he was scheduled to talk to him. The RNC said that the scheduling conflict was because of a noon meeting at the organization, but officials stressed that it wasn’t an “emergency” meeting.

    Less discussed was the fact that Steele also canceled an interview with conservative radio host and Tea Party activist Dana Loesch, whose show airs Monday-Friday at 7:00 p.m. CT. Loesch was incensed when Steele canceled his interview with her, writing on Twitter that it was indicative of his failure to connect with Tea Party protesters:

    Dana Loesch Twitter page

    She also gave props to Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill (MO) for keeping her interview, writing, “So out of @clairecmc and @chairmanmsteele , McCaskill is the one who keeps her interview. #steelefail”

    Loesch ended up doing a “fake” interview with Steele, where she asked the questions she was planning to ask and then also gave mock answers as the RNC chairman, whom she called a “butt sniffer” for standing her up. While the interview was fake, Loesch’s mock answers for Steele reflected real dissatisfaction with the RNC — which initially backed Republican Dede Scozzafava in the NY-23 special election instead of far-right favorite Conservative Doug Hoffman — from the Tea Party movement. Some highlights from fake Michael Steele in the interview:

    – “I’m probably very likely most definitely going to get fired from the GOP because instead of using opportunities like the crotch bomber and instead of using opportunities like the fact that Democrats have shut the doors and refused to allow the public to view the debate going on between reconciling the House and the Senate bill — instead of doing that, I’m out promoting my stupid book!

    – “I said in an interview previously that I had this book written before I even became chairman of the Republican Party. Ha ha! In fact, I became chairman Republican Party just so I would have a platform to go out and sell my book. Because I’m going to tell you something, Dana. You see my book here? It’s called “Right Now.” It doesn’t sound so awesome when you’re like, ‘Oh, here’s a book by the Lt. Gov. of Maryland!’ It sounds way much more awesomer to say, ‘Here’s a book by the Chairman of the Republican Party!’”

    – “Oh, it’s because I am cool, Dana. What up? I know that you saw the original title to my blog. It was called, ‘What up?’ That’s hip, that’s fresh young talk.

    Loesch responded to fake Steele by asking, “Why should we believe in you? Let’s look at what you’ve done. We don’t have a clear leader for 2012. We don’t even have a clear leader congressionally for 2010. The RNC screwed up NY-23. The RNC has failed to get behind Scott Brown adequately; they haven’t give him enough support. You endorsed Dede Scozzafava for crying out loud! You guys come in and you try to co-opt this movement and that movement. You have egg on your face. Donations to the RNC are down.” Watch it:

  • THE TALK SHOWS

    THE TALK SHOWS
    Guests to be interviewed Sunday on major television talk shows:

    Sunday Take: Not much concrete with this Steele
    Republican National Committee Chairman Michael S. Steele published a book this past week titled “Right Now.” It should have been called “Going Rogue.”

    The unintended ripples from the biomass subsidy program
    It sounded like a good idea: Provide a little government money to convert wood shavings and plant waste into renewable energy.

  • Washington Needs Dose of Common Sense

    Washington Needs Dose of Common Sense
    Larry Kudlow, RealClearPolitics
    After the arrival of a disappointing December jobs report, my thought on putting America back to work is simple: ) de-stimulate.That's right. Get rid of the Obama stimulus monster, including the government takeover of health care, cap-and-trade and all this nonsensical talk of creating green jobs. Get rid of the increase in marginal personal tax rates and capital-gains tax rates. Get rid of the payroll tax hike from the health care talks. Get rid of the spending that is a counterweight to growth. Get rid of it, every part of it. It's creating so much uncertainty that even profitable…

    Obama’s Transparent Insincerity on Health Care
    Rich Lowry, NRO
    Barack Obama couldn't possibly have meant his campaign promise to hold negotiations on major legislation in public, broadcast live on C-SPAN. How could he?He'd been in the Illinois legislature for eight years and in the Senate for two, not enough experience to make him a Robert Byrd-style expert on Senate procedure going back to the Romans, but surely enough to realize that much important work has to take place in secret. Receive news alertsIf sunshine is a great disinfectant, it's also a great encouragement to grandstanding and obfuscation. Sensitive negotiations have to be…

    States Face Disaster Without Federal Help
    Bob Herbert, New York Times
    We didn’t pay attention to the housing bubble. We closed our eyes to warnings that the levees in New Orleans were inadequate. We gave short shrift to reports that bin Laden was determined to attack the U.S. And now we’re all but ignoring the fiscal train wreck that is coming from states with budget crises big enough to boggle the mind. Bob Herbert The states are in the worst fiscal shape since the Depression. The Great Recession has caused state tax revenues to fall off a cliff. Some states — New York and California come quickly to mind — are facing…

    Goldman Shouldn’t Pay a Penny in Bonuses
    Simon Johnson, New Republic
    Sources say that Goldman Sachs’s bonuses will be announced on Monday, January 18, and actually paid sometime between February 4 and February 7. In previous years, the bonuses were paid in early January–but the financial year shifted when Goldman became a bank holding company.For critics of the company and its fellow travelers, the timing could not be better.Anxiety levels about the financial sector are on the increase, even on Capitol Hill. The tension between high profits in banking and stress in the rest of the economy becomes increasingly a topic of…

  • China Roars Past U.S. to Become No. 1 Auto Market

    China Roars Past U.S. to Become No. 1 Auto Market
    With the U.S. economic slump and the seemingly never-ending boom in Chinese manufacturing, it comes as no surprise that China has become the world’s biggest car market, with 13.5 million vehicles sold in 2009—or 2.1 million more than the U.S. —JCL The Guardian: China has overtaken the US to become the biggest car market in the world as government policy initiatives spur demand. China sold more than 13.5m vehicles last year, the official Xinhua news agency said today, compared with 10.4m cars and light trucks sold in the US, the lowest level in 27 years. The Chinese tally includes heavy vehicles but is still higher than that of the US after roughly 650,000 units of heavy trucks are deducted, according to Orient Securities, the Chinese brokerage. Read more

    With the U.S. economic slump and the seemingly never-ending boom in Chinese manufacturing, it comes as no surprise that China has become the world’s biggest car market, with 13.5 million vehicles sold in 2009—or 2.1 million more than the U.S. —JCL

    The Guardian:

    China has overtaken the US to become the biggest car market in the world as government policy initiatives spur demand.

    China sold more than 13.5m vehicles last year, the official Xinhua news agency said today, compared with 10.4m cars and light trucks sold in the US, the lowest level in 27 years.

    The Chinese tally includes heavy vehicles but is still higher than that of the US after roughly 650,000 units of heavy trucks are deducted, according to Orient Securities, the Chinese brokerage.

    Read more

    Related Entries


  • Huff Radio: Left, Right & Center: Obama’s approval ratings, countering terror, and are the Dems doomed?

    Huff Radio: Left, Right & Center: Obama’s approval ratings, countering terror, and are the Dems doomed?
    If banks aren’t lending, what’s a citizen to do? Arianna advocates moving money into community banks. Tony says the big banks aren’t lending because they’re being more cautious and trying to build capital.

    Supreme Court Ruling Expected To End Limits On Political Contribution From Corporations, Unions
    Even before a landmark Supreme Court ruling on campaign finance law expected within days, a series of other court decisions is reshaping the political battlefield…

    Eliot Spitzer Weighs In On Geithner And AIG-New York Fed Emails (VIDEO)
    Former New York Governor Eliot Spitzer made an appearance on The Ed Show Friday. Spitzer weighed in on the scandal surrounding emails from the New…

    Raj Patel: Proud to Be An American
    In San Francisco yesterday, I was one of 1,245 people who put our hands on our hearts and with one voice betrothed ourselves to a flag. There was something faintly cultish about it all.

  • Fox & Friends , NY Post complain about Obama press conference delay, which was due to document declassification

    Fox & Friends , NY Post complain about Obama press conference delay, which was due to document declassification

    Fox & Friends‘ hosts and the New York Post editorial board complained that the “near-five-hour delay” (or “three-and-a-half hour delay”) of President Obama’s press conference addressing the intelligence review of Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab’s alleged attempt to set off a bomb on a Northwest Airlines flight on Christmas day was “disconcerting,” “strange and eerie,” “dysfunctional,” and “not what the White House should be doing.” In fact — as Fox & Friends co-host Steve Doocy at one point acknowledged — administration officials stated that the delay was required to declassify the summary of a report on the attempted attack which was released following the conference.

    Fox & Friends hosts complaints continue even after Doocy acknowledges delay caused by need to “declassify” document

    After Kilmeade called delay “strange,” Doocy said that according to “The Washington Post this morning … they were trying to declassify more of the stuff.” Co-hosts Brian Kilmeade, Gretchen Carlson, and Steve Doocy discussed the press conference delay on the January 8 edition of Fox & Friends:

    CARLSON: But did anyone learn anything new yesterday? That was what was frustrating to me. Number one, they said we were going to have these shocking revelations. There was no big shock. But why was there that three-and-a-half hour delay?

    KILMEADE: That was strange.

    CARLSON: The president was supposed to come out at 1 p.m. and give us this shocking revelation. And then he did in fact not come out until 4:30 p.m. Eastern time. So what did they deem that was too shocking to tell the American public?

    DOOCY: Well, I think part of it was they were rushing to try to declassify some of the stuff that they would talk about. And so they — you know they — according to one of the reports, I believe it was in The Washington Post this morning, that they were trying to declassify more of the stuff. But absolutely, when you look at the facts we already had, they were shocking enough already.

    Carlson: Obama was “front and center yesterday giving his speech — three-and-a-half hours delayed — telling the American public guess what? We actually are at war.” Even after Doocy acknowledged the declassification of documents as the reason for the press conference delay, Gretchen Carlson still highlighted the delay, stating: “All right, let’s talk a little bit about the president of the United States because he was front and center yesterday giving his speech — three-and-a-half hours delayed — telling the American public, ‘Guess what? We actually are at war.’ ”

    Johnson on the delay: “it was strange and eerie, it’s dysfunctional, it shows disorganization, it’s not what the White House should be doing.” Also after Doocy stated that the delay was due to declassification, Kilmeade and Fox News senior legal analyst Peter Johnson Jr. called the delay “strange and eerie”:

    JOHNSON: But there’s something else that’s going on, and there seems to be some confusion. First of all, it took them hours to get the president out there. They kept on pushing back the time of the statement of the press conference –

    KILMEADE: That was strange and eerie.

    JOHNSON: It was strange and eerie, it’s dysfunctional, it shows disorganization, it’s not what the White House should be doing.

    NY Post: press conference delay is “disconcerting message of irresolution and confusion”

    From the January 8 New York Post editorial:

    If Obama had lopped off a couple of heads after the Detroit fiasco — and yesterday wouldn’t have been too late — it would have sent a powerful signal: This guy means business.

    He didn’t.

    Equally disconcerting was the near-five-hour delay between the time Obama was scheduled to address the nation and when he finally did. Given that National Security Adviser Jim Jones had set the stage for the speech by promising that new information was at hand that would “shock” the nation, the delay sent a disconcerting message of irresolution and confusion.

    Administration stated that “declassifying a highly complex document” caused delay

    Gibbs apologized for the delayed press conference, citing “declassifying a highly complex document” as the cause. White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs opened the press conference by apologizing for the delayed time, stating that “declassifying a highly complex document takes some time, and we wanted to get that right.” From the January 7 press conference:

    GIBBS: Good morning, guys. Good afternoon, or good early evening. I want to first apologize for the delay in the events that have occurred over the past couple hours. As you all know, declassifying a highly complex document takes some time, and we wanted to get that right.

    Politico: “Officials acknowledged that the three-and-a-half hour delay” “due to efforts to clear the declassified summary through various government agencies.” From a January 8 Politco article:

    Officials acknowledged that the three-and-a-half hour delay in Obama’s remarks, originally set for 1 p.m., was due to efforts to clear the declassified summary through various government agencies. In that time, some information was stripped out, though it’s unclear if it was whatever Jones and others deemed to be shocking.

    “Was it redacted further? Yes it was,” said one official who asked not to be named. “One has to be extremely careful what is made public. It can provide knowledge to your enemies.”

    Associated Press: Obama’s “remarks delayed twice as officials scrambled to declassify a six-page summary…of security failures.” A January 8 Associated Press article reported of Obama’s press conference: “He spoke from the State Dining Room at the White House, his remarks delayed twice as officials scrambled to declassify a six-page summary of a report he’d ordered from top officials on the security failures. That summary was released immediately after he spoke, as was Obama’s three-page directive to agency chiefs.”

  • NY Fed: Geithner Wasn’t Involved In AIG Disclosures Issues

    NY Fed: Geithner Wasn’t Involved In AIG Disclosures Issues
    The New York Fed says Tim Geithner wasn’t involved in the New York Fed’s late 2008 effort to press AIG to avoid disclosing information about its bailout funds.

    Grand Jury Convened In Arpaio Probe, Say Officials
    U.S. prosecutors have convened a grand jury as part of their investigation into abuses by Sheriff Joe Arpaio — a sign that the probe may be kicking into a higher gear.


  • Factory Farmed Meat Can Trigger a Global Pandemic That Wipes Out 60% of Those Infected

    Factory Farmed Meat Can Trigger a Global Pandemic That Wipes Out 60% of Those Infected
    The chicken and pork industries have wrought unprecedented changes in bird and swine flu. Billions could die in a deadly flu pandemic, the likes of which we have never seen.

    The chicken and pork industries have wrought unprecedented changes in bird and swine flu. Billions could die in a deadly flu pandemic, the likes of which we have never seen.

    The TSA Is Funding Airport Mind-Reading Scanners
    The risks to personal privacy inherent in mind-reading technologies should concern the public about abuse of their rights.

    The risks to personal privacy inherent in mind-reading technologies should concern the public about abuse of their rights.

    Fox News’ Shameless Christian Crusade
    At Fox News, religion is easy: Christianity is right and good and must be defended from its relentless persecutors, and other faiths are dangerous, inadequate, or a joke.

    At Fox News, religion is easy: Christianity is right and good and must be defended from its relentless persecutors, and other faiths are dangerous, inadequate, or a joke.

    Is Whole Foods Bad for the Planet?
    CEO John Mackey is a climate change denier. Meanwhile, companies scorned by Whole Foods’ main customer base have stepped up efforts to deal with climate change.

    CEO John Mackey is a climate change denier. Meanwhile, companies scorned by Whole Foods' main customer base have stepped up efforts to deal with climate change.

  • The LiberalOasis Radio Show: Lentil Soup Edition

    The LiberalOasis Radio Show: Lentil Soup Edition

    The LiberalOasis Radio Show was broadcast Saturday at 12 noon on WHMP in Western MA. (And will be re-broadcast at 8 PM on Tuesday.) This week featured Jennifer Nix on the need to accept what is politically possible on health care, Sarah Buttenwieser on how a community can come together when faced with tragedy and terror, “Momtroversies” essayist Traci Olsen on how parents should not act like their parents and learn to love “Twilight” and Tina McElmoyl on how our relationship with food shifted in 2009.

    For those interested in Tina’s lentil soup recipe, here it is:

    1/8 cup of extra virgin olive oil 1/2 onion finely chopped 2 cups of dried lentils 2 cloves of garlic chopped and crushed 1 cup whole, peeled tomatoes (preferrably those tomatoes you canned last summer at the peak of their tastiness) 1 cup of tomato juice 6 cups of your favorite vegetable stock

    Dump it all in a pot and, after it comes to a boil, simmer it , partially covered for 45 minutes. Before serving, I like to mash about 1/2 of the lentils with a potato masher, for texture.

    You can download the podcast at these links: (iTunes / XML feed / MP3).

  • Native-American GOP Congressman Calls Steele?s ?Honest Injun? Comments ?Unacceptable?

    Native-American GOP Congressman Calls Steele?s ?Honest Injun? Comments ?Unacceptable?
    On Monday, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele attracted considerable attention for a controversial term he used on Fox News: STEELE:Our platform is one of the best political documents that’s been written in the last 25 years. Honest Injun on that. It speaks to some core conservative principles on the value of family, faith, life, economics. […]

    On Monday, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele attracted considerable attention for a controversial term he used on Fox News:

    STEELE:Our platform is one of the best political documents that’s been written in the last 25 years. Honest Injun on that. It speaks to some core conservative principles on the value of family, faith, life, economics. Those principles don’t change.

    Watch it:

    Today, ThinkProgress received a statement from Rep. Tom Cole (R-OK) in response to Steele’s remarks:

    It’s unacceptable. And while I’m certain Chairman Steele didn’t intend it that way, it’s an offensive phrase in the Native American community.

    Cole’s condemnation of Steele is significant, not only because he is a fellow Republican, but also because he is an enrolled member of the Chickasaw Nation and the only Native American serving in the House. Rep. Dale Kildee (D-MI), co-chairman of the Congressional Native American Caucus, has also demanded that Steele apologize: “His insensitive comment undermines and threatens to reverse the progress we have made to correct those wrongs.”

    Leeanne Root of Indian Country Today writes that a public apology from Steele — who has been blanketing the media to promote his book — is “well overdue.” “Steele’s use of this racist phrase — on a widely viewed national program, no less — disrespects a community that works hard to educate about the true history of the United States and wants to participate in its productive future,” she writes.

    A Self-Described ?Wiser Lou Dobbs? Supports Legalizing Undocumented Immigrants
    Former CNN anchor and anti-immigration reform crusader Lou Dobbs appeared on the O’Reilly Factor last night with an interesting announcement. Dobbs told host O’Reilly that he supports immigration reform with a path to citizenship and also lamented his “combative nature” during the 2007 immigration debate. Dobbs continued insisting that his position on immigration […]

    Former CNN anchor and anti-immigration reform crusader Lou Dobbs appeared on the O’Reilly Factor last night with an interesting announcement. Dobbs told host O’Reilly that he supports immigration reform with a path to citizenship and also lamented his “combative nature” during the 2007 immigration debate. Dobbs continued insisting that his position on immigration hasn’t changed, explaining that he simply overemphasized border security in the past to the exclusion of legalization and that a “wiser Lou Dobbs” has emerged who is committed to promoting both:

    DOBBS: I think the essence of the legislation of 2007 is right: pay a fine, learn English, commit to assimilation in the United States, and begin a path to citizenship…there should also be another guest worker program. […]

    O’REILLY: You sound very moderate. As you said, “I’m the tougher guy here.” Why do you think Hispanics come after you so hard?

    DOBBS: I think in part — one thing is my own stupidity. I put forward a statement: rational, effective, humane policy…the emphasis became in the debate of my combative nature the issue of border security first and foremost, versus reforming immigration policy. I’m saying the same thing, but I’m keeping it absolutely combined.

    O’REILLY: So you’re a kinder, gentler Lou Dobbs.

    DOBBS: I’m a wiser Lou Dobbs.

    Watch it:

    Politifact found “no point-blank case” in which Dobbs has explicitly opposed legalizing undocumented immigrants, however he did repeatedly refer to the immigration legislation he praised last night as an “amnesty bill” during the 2007 debate. Dobbs also slammed Sen. John McCain (R-AZ) and President Obama during the 2008 presidential race for supporting “[guest worker] programs that bring in cheap foreign labor at the expense of American workers.” Last month, the anti-immigrant group Americans for Legal Immigration PAC announced it was dropping its support of Dobbs, citing a perceived change of views that “deeply offended his base.”

    Despite his new proclaimed emphasis on border security and legalization, during the beginning of the segment a supposedly “wiser” Dobbs told O’Reilly that a recent bill introduced by Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-IL) is nothing but a “a list of what the open-borders amnesty crowd wants.” Gutierrez’s bill would establish an earned legalization program with requirements similar to those proposed by Dobbs and also includes several provisions aimed at beefing up border security.

    Cross-posted at Wonk Room.

  • Justices may rule soon on campaign-finance case

    Justices may rule soon on campaign-finance case
    After a holiday break, the Supreme Court returned to work Friday with unfinished business at hand, some of its toughest cases ahead and a looming decision that could rock the national political landscape in this year of midterm congressional elections.

    Steele’s book release, fiery rhetoric fuel dissatisfaction within GOP
    Michael S. Steele’s already turbulent tenure as Republican Party chairman grew even more so this week as comments he made while releasing a new book sparked a messy feud over whether he is promoting himself at the expense of the party.

    Airliner plot being prosecuted ‘in wrong place,’ Giuliani says
    Prominent conservatives again hit the airwaves Friday to decry the Obama administration for forsaking valuable intelligence by prosecuting terrorism suspects. Yet a review of four recent criminal cases suggests that old-school law enforcement tools have succeeded in unlocking some terrorists’ sec…


    Educators await Obama’s mark on No Child Left Behind
    Eight years after President George W. Bush signed the bill that branded an era of school reform, the education world is wondering when President Obama will seek to rewrite the No Child Left Behind law .

  • Why Democrats Are Jumping Ship

    Why Democrats Are Jumping Ship
    Ruben Navarrette, CNN
    San Diego, California (CNN) — When exactly did the donkey become an endangered species?

    GOP Has a Problem. His Name is Michael Steele
    David Corn, Politics Daily

    Identifying Source of Terror Threat is Key
    Frank Beckmann, Detroit News
    All of us in Metro Detroit are thankful that accused terrorist Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was unable to detonate the explosives in his undershorts on the Christmas journey of Northwest Airlines Flight 253 from Amsterdam to Detroit. But with such a call so close to home, it raises concerns that another effort could succeed if there is a more capable attacker. President Barack Obama has brainstormed with his national security team and is instituting new safety measures for our air industry, but I'm afraid these reactionary plans don't address the root problem of the threat, which he…

    We Need Fewer Dots to Connect
    Eugene Robinson, Washington Post
    “Connecting the dots” is a lousy metaphor that creates unrealistic expectations. The phrase suggests that the only thing our intelligence analysts have to do is draw a line from the point labeled “1″ to the point labeled “2″ and so on, and soon they're looking at the unmistakable outline of a terrorist plot. In reality, though, the page is so crowded with dots that they almost touch. Most are irrelevant, and not a single one is numbered.The clues that would have alerted authorities to the Christmas Day underwear bomber were buried under mountains of…

  • Eunice Wong on ?Footnotes in Gaza?

    Eunice Wong on ?Footnotes in Gaza?
    Joe Sacco’s graphic treatment of the 1956 massacres of Palestinians by invading Israeli soldiers melds tough-minded journalism with philosophical reflection into a gut-wrenching banquet of a comic book.

    footnotes in gaza

    Joe Sacco’s graphic treatment of the 1956 massacres of Palestinians by invading Israeli soldiers melds tough-minded journalism with philosophical reflection into a gut-wrenching banquet of a comic book.

    Related Entries

  • Health Care Reform Could Boost Jobs And Save Money, Say Harvard, USC Economists

    Health Care Reform Could Boost Jobs And Save Money, Say Harvard, USC Economists
    In a report to be released today, Harvard and USC economists say legislation being considered would slow cost increases and free up money for companies…

    Richard (RJ) Eskow: Weird Science: Why Politicians and Pundits Cling to the “Cadillac Tax” Idea
    I believe that the President, Sen. Kerry, and other advocates of the “Cadillac tax” on health care plans are intelligent, ethical, dedicated people. So why do they support what amounts to wishful thinking based on dubious research?

    Orville Schell: The Melting of America: The Story of a Can’t-Do Nation
    We Americans seem to have passed a tipping point.  Like the glaciers of the high Himalaya, long-familiar aspects of our nation are beginning to feel as if they were, in a sense, melting away.

  • Quick Fact: Beck falsely claims “SEIU” is “number-one visitor to the White House”

    Quick Fact: Beck falsely claims “SEIU” is “number-one visitor to the White House”

    On January 7, Glenn Beck falsely suggested that Service Employees International Union (SEIU) president Andy Stern is the “number-one visitor to the White House.” Politifact has rated Beck’s prior claim that Stern was “the most frequent visitor at the White House” as “false.”

    From the January 7 broadcast of Premiere Radio Networks’ The Glenn Beck Program:

    BECK: Don’t you see how well-orchestrated this is to overwhelm the system. You can’t tell me that organized labor, with as much as they control this country now, that the number-one visitor to the White House and meeting with President Obama is SEIU. And they’re against this, and their case is “we will not be able to afford the Cadillac health tax. We’ll not be able to afford the health plans for these pensions if you pass this.” There shouldn’t be anything else on the agenda. If he’s meeting with President Obama — SEIU and organized labor — they shouldn’t talk about anything else, every time. “You must not pass that. You must not pass that. You must not pass that.”

    Fact: SEIU’s Stern is “not the number-one visitor to the White House”

    Politifact rated as “false” Beck’s previous claim that SEIU’s Andy Stern was “the most frequent visitor at the White House. In a December 7, 2009, post, Politifact reported:

    We found the source of Beck’s claim. When the White House released its first batch of visitor logs on Oct. 30, 2009, as part of a pledge to bring more transparency to the White House, Stern’s name did indeed appear 22 times, more than anyone else listed, including Clinton, who was listed three times.

    But that’s not the whole story.

    Stern led the pack for the first data release, which covered visits from Jan. 20, 2009 to July 31, 2009. But he was surpassed by several other individuals in the second release, which updates the data through Aug. 31, 2009 (and which was made public more than a week before Beck aired his comment).

    Among those who visited more frequently than Stern, according to the combination of the two logs, were Lewis (Lee) Sachs, counselor to Treasury Secetary Timothy Geithner, with 92 visits; associate attorney general Tom Perrelli, with 49; Federal Communications Commission chairman Julius Genachowski with 47; Spencer Overton, principal deputy assistant attorney general, with 38; and Health and Human Services office of health reform director Jeanne Lambrew, with 27. (Stern visited twice more during the period covered by the second batch of data, giving him a total of 24 visits.) [Politifact, [12/7/09]

    Stern does not appear in the visitor logs the White House subsequently released on December 30 for the period from September 16 through September 30.