Author: Ian Sullivan

  • Did the Queen’s speech deliver on aid commitments?

    Campaigner Ian Sullivan asks, has the first Queen’s speech of the new parliament delivered for poor people?

    We had the election and the people spoke – or said ‘hhhhmmmm, not sure’. Now we’ve entered the brave new world of hung parliaments and coalition. Yesterday was a more familiar moment for British people. We had the cosy reassurance and familiarity of the pomp and regalia of the Queen’s speech and the opening of parliament. I didn’t count the number of jewels in the crown but I couldn’t see any cuts there.

    This was also the big legislative launch of the Dave and Nick show, or Libcon or Conlibs alliance, depending on where you stand. One area that I was particularly looking forward to hearing about was the commitment to legislate on the historic 0.7% of Gross National Income (GNI) commitment that had been made in 1970. We’ve only been waiting on this for 40 years now.

    Since all three main party leaders promised to introduce this piece of legislation as part of their manifestos, I was excitedly waiting to hear the news of how and when it would happen. I was hoping that they’d get on with it, get it through parliament and onto the books. No more “promises”, “commitments”, “ambitions”, “hopes” or “dreams”. Basically, I was listening out for some cold, hard timetables and some boring official type language that pointed to imminent action. I didn’t hear it.

    The good news is that the government didn’t backtrack and scrap our aid commitments. In an age of austerity (cuts to you and me) we have to be thankful for that. They did reaffirm the promise to reach the 0.7% of GDP figure by 2013. This was also put out on the Department for International Development website, and it forms part of the coalition agreement between the two parties. Compared to most rich nations, the UK is in a good position.

    But the point is that legislating for 0.7% was what we were sold throughout the election. Today was a great chance to follow through on this promise and show the world that we are serious about tackling poverty. What a great message of global leadership this would have sent out ahead of the G8 and the UN Millennium Development Goals Summit later this year.

    In the last ten years, international aid has achieved some pretty incredible results. We’ve seen millions more people on life saving HIV and AIDS anti-retroviral drugs (ARVs) and 32 million extra children in school. But there’s still more to be done.

    We’ve been waiting for 40 years for the government to keep the promises they’ve made, and after today we’ll have to wait longer yet for it definitely to be in the bag.

    There’s a lot to be pleased about when it comes to government aid commitments, but we can’t ease up the pressure until we see it sat in the statute books and in the budgets.

    Take action and tell the government, “Don’t Drop the Ball on Aid”.

  • Animation: Does aid work?

    When you work for an international development agency you’re always looking for engaging ways to tell the development story.

    In a bid to try something different – not just writing policy papers and thousands of words blog type features – we came up with the idea of using animations. We wanted to give people who support Oxfam the tools to challenge aid sceptics. We also hope to reach new people who might not come across our policy positions any other way.

    I wrote the script for the animation below and then worked with an animation team from State of Play Games. There was a lot of back and forth as we refined the messages, adapted the animations and then went through the rigours of getting it signed off. Colours have to be right, you have to say things like this or like that – it’s complicated working at a large NGO.

    This animation outlines the case for where aid has made a difference to millions of lives and shows that the idea that aid simply doesn’t work, doesn’t fit the reality in many of the poorest parts of the world.

    I’d be really interested to hear what people think.

  • Global aid figures released. Are they 0.7 committed?

    I reckon that I’m pretty much 0.7% committed and I want government’s around the world to be equally committed. Not much to ask?

    Well, judging by last years aid figures, which were released yesterday by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), it‘s a lot to ask for many countries. With the UN Millennium Development Goals (MDG) review conference just a few months away these figures set the scene for how rich nations are doing in delivering their part of the MDGs. Read more about these eight goals and how they have the potential to lift millions of people out of poverty. 

    So, the good news. It’s been 40 years since rich countries made the promise to give 0.7% Gross Domestic Product (what they earn) as international aid. The UK is on track to meet this commitment by 2013. Currently, only Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Luxembourg and the Netherlands have honoured this.

    Further good news comes as the main UK political parties have all pledged to introduce legislation in the next parliament to require the UK government to permanently keep this life-saving promise. That’s fantastic and something that campaigners up and down the country should be proud of.

    It goes without saying that we won’t be satisfied until that becomes law! We know that when aid is delivered properly it transforms lives. Have a look at my previous blog from Zambia, there aid money means that the poorest people are getting access to the Anti-retroviral drugs that they need to stay alive.  
     
    What else do the OECD figures show? There has been a fraction of an increase in total aid, from $122 to $123 billion. At first glance that seems great BUT (there’s so often a BUT) the amount of aid has actually fallen by $3.5 billion when compared with last year’s prices.

    Clearly, not every country is doing as well as those above. Italy, Ireland, Canada, Germany and Japan all cut their aid budgets last year. This isn’t good enough and all rich countries must commit to timetables to meet 0.7 when they meet at the UN Summit in September.

    Hopefully the UK government can play a leading role in getting the other countries to show that same level of 0.7% commitment. After all, it’s not a lot to ask for but it can save millions of lives.

    Oxfam CEO, Barabara Stocking responds in the Daily Telegraph to the political parties pledges to legislate for 0.7%

  • Calling film makers, enter our competition!

    Filming a protest. Credit: Oxfam

    Filming a protest. Credit: Oxfam

    It’s lights, camera, action time. We’re calling on Oxfam supporters all around the world to make a short film and enter our film competition. There’s the chance to win some camera equipment, but more importantly you’ll get loads of kudos and your film will be shown around the world. If you care about challenging poverty and you’re a budding movie maker than now is your chance to use your talent and get noticed by taking part in this prestigious competition.

    What’s it all about?

    Well, this year is pretty important in the fight against poverty. There’s a massive UN Summit in Spetember where leaders will be discussing the Millennium Development Goals and it’s a great chance for us to remind them of the commitments that they’ve made to tackling poverty. As Spanish President, and current EU President, Zapatero said, “the objective of the international community must continue to be the eradication of hunger and poverty”.

    So, Oxfam Intermon (that’s Oxfam Spain) have teamed up with ACTUA to invite contestants from arond the world to make a short film on the theme of poverty. In a world where nearly one billion people live on less than 1 dollar a day, and women make account for over three quarters of these people; we think that this is a massively important area that filmmakers need to address.

    How does it work?

    This competition is open to anyone. For more information about the rules have a look on the website. But the closing date is 31st April and it’s up to you to decide what your film is about. There will be a jury of people to deicide the winner, past jury members include José Antonio Bayona (filmmaker) Eduardo Noriega (actor), Eduardo Chapero Jackson (awarded the Golden Lion for Best European Short film in Venice 2007 for “Alumbramiento”) and loads of other film maker types.

    There’s already been entries from Australia, Germany and Belgium, and with the winning films being screened across the world, from Madrid to Addis Abeba to Lima, it promises to be a truly global event. The films that reach the final will be screened simultaneously in nearly 30 cities throughout Spain, and audiences will have the chance to vote for the Audience Award, awarded at a ceremony in Madrid on June 12.

    So, if you fancy yourself as a film maker and if you’ve got something to say about poverty then get your camera, get filming and good luck!

    Find out more about the film festival.

  • Was it a Robin Hood budget?

    It was red briefcase day yesterday as the Chancellor Alistair Darling announced the UK budget. While the aid budget remained intact (yay!) the Chancellor ignored the calls that have been raining in loudly and in massive numbers to implement the Robin Hood Tax (boo).

    By coming across all Sheriff of Nottingham he’s let down the 150,000 people in Britain who support a Robin Hood Tax and the millions of people here and abroad who could benefit from its implementation.

    A real Robin Hood Tax on financial transactions would raise tens of billions of pounds for good causes but his proposed levy is both less ambitious and prone to delay

    He did propose a global bank tax but this will raise a fraction of the amount that a real Robin Hood tax would achieve. Plus, there’s no guarantee at all that the money would be used to protect jobs, help poor people at home and abroad or fight the effects of climate change.

    Poor people were banking on the Chancellor to play Robin Hood but instead he has chosen to let rich financial institutions off the hook.

    The Chancellor missed an opportunity to show real global leadership. It is not true that this tax cannot be unilateral – we already have one unilateral tax on stocks and shares- we could easily have another one now on sterling which would get the ball rolling and start preventing job cuts and helping the poor.

    I always think of Royal Bank of Scotland’s strap-line, more apt than they probably thought of at the time: You deserve a better bank. Unfortunately, we still don’t have one.

    More about Robin Hood

  • World Water Day – queue for a loo

    World's longest toilet queue logo

    World’s longest toilet queue logo

    In the UK, we take water for granted. It falls out of the sky at more than regular intervals and I don’t have a clue what I’d do if I turned on the tap or flushed the toilet and nothing happened. Across Europe and America people buy bottles of water without even thinking about where it came from. As today is World Water Day, I’ve been thinking about the fact that this makes us extremely lucky.

    Around the world, for most people, water isn’t something to be taken for granted. People in the drier equatorial parts of the world travel for miles to get clean drinking water and when disasters strike – like in Haiti recently – ensuring that people have access to water is always a priority.

    It’s estimated that people need 15 litres of water a day as an absolute minimum to drink, cook and generally keep things clean and sanitary. It sounds like quite a bit until you think that when you flush your bog standard toilet (sorry!) it uses nine litres.

    So this World Water Day I’ve joined the World’s Longest Toilet Queue to send a message to leaders of rich and poor countries, that it’s time to do something about the fact that 4,000 children die needlessly every day.

    We need to see rich governments give targeted aid to improve sanitary conditions for the world’s poorest people and we need government’s in developing countries to invest and make strong plans to get safe, clean water to their citizens.

    Read more about Oxfam’s work on water and sanitation.

    Join the world’s longest toilet queue.

  • Robin Hood: A formidable tax and a formidable campaign

    From politicians to students, economists to the Archbishop of Canterbury and even the Prime Minister, the support has been growing for the Robin Hood Tax. 

    Robin Hood campaign hitting the target

    Robin Hood campaign hitting the target

    After championing the cause in Parliament last Wednesday, Nottingham MP Graham Allen got merry again during a televised debate with Chief Executive of the British Bankers Association, Angela Knight. Then Gordon Brown backed a Robin Hood style tax during a news conference with Nicolas Sarkozy, saying that he and the French President had “stuck with the idea” of a financial transactions levy despite others’ scepticism.

    The British Prime Minister also recognised the excellent work which Robin and his merry band have been doing, calling it “a formidable online campaign” on the BBC’s East Midlands Politics Show.

    There’s been high profile support from other areas as well. Following his appearance at the RSA, leading economist Jeffrey Sachs has been explaining how the time has come for a financial transaction tax in  an article in The Guardian and a letter in European Voice. Archbishop Rowan Williams and Richard Curtis wrote in The Sunday Times that the tax was the best way of tackling poverty at home and abroad.

    As well making a splash at the highest level of government and across the media, Robin Hood supporters – the people who make this happen – have been busy this week. On Tuesday, the Student Stop AIDS Alliance held a panel discussion with representatives from the three main parties on how a Robin Hood Tax could fund international aid. Students in Edinburgh also got merry, and raised money for Alzheimer Scotland by using coins to make a picture of Robin with his bow and arrows.

    Finally, we have an important action for the growing band of Merry (Wo)Men in the lead up to next Wednesday’s UK Budget announcement. If you want Chancellor Alistair Darling to show his support for our good idea, then send an email asking him to introduce a Robin Hood Tax on sterling transactions. There’s been an amazing response so far but there’s not much time left, so get involved and spread the word!

    Tell the chancellor to support the Robin Hood Tax

    Find out more about the Robin Hood Tax

  • Robin Hood heads to parliament

    Our colleagues over in Sherwood Forest (the totally online Sherwood Forest), have been busy making a big buzz about implementing the Financial Transaction Tax, aka Robin Hood Tax.

    Thousands of you wrote to your MP telling them what a marvellous idea a tiny 0.05% tax on financial transactions would be. So the MPs responded to this public pressure by deciding to have a debate. The brief video below explains the ins and outs. Unfortunately it was too late to be considered for the Oscar for best set.

    Thanks to merry man Graham Allen MP (Nottingham North) a debate was secured this week. MPs from all parties joined in adding their support for a tax. The public support the campaign has enjoyed was a key point of the debate. The Treasury Minister, Stephen Timms MP, responded and said he commended the Robin Hood Tax campaign.

    The Minister agreed that we need to see reform of the financial sector and that the Treasury was working with the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and with other European countries to see what kind of international regulation would work best. Some of the MPs present urged the government to take this opportunity to show leadership on the global stage.

    So we got an OK response from the Government but they need to go further – we want to see them come out in full support of a financial transaction tax. And with your support we’ll keep making merry until we do.

    More information about the Robin Hood Tax.

    More ways that you can take action.

  • This general election ask a climate question

    “We want a real deal” carved into an ice sculpture outside the Copenhagen climate talks

    The best-kept secret in UK politics is that we’re going to the polls on May 6th to decide who will lead the UK for next 4 years. The election battle lines are already being drawn, policy positions are being formulated and we’re all getting ready for a good old political ding-dong.

    Over the next few weeks people wearing rosettes and repeating slogans will be knocking on your door and canvassing for your support. When they do, tell them how passionate you are about taking action to help people living in poverty combat the affects of climate change.

    Polls show widespread public support for strong action on climate change. However, candidates aren’t currently prioritising it in their constituency campaigning, let’s change this. Domestic problems will be top of most people’s list of concerns but as well as worrying about the economy etc, it’s vital that we don’t let climate change slip off the radar.

    The December 2009 UN climate change Summit in Copenhagen didn’t result in the FAB deal (fair, ambitious and legally binding) that the world desperately needs. The world still needs that deal and we must make sure that the new Government (whoever they are) works towards getting it. They must also do their best to reduce carbon emissions at home and help finance climate adaptation and mitigation in poor countries.

    Failure to act on climate change in the next decade presents a high risk of severe and irreversible damage, with profound consequences for our planet and communities world-wide.

    Climate change can be tackled. The UK can be put on the path to a green economy with thousands of new green jobs. But only if politicians know that there is public support for action. In the UK, a General Election is the opportunity to give that message loud and clear.

    As we get ready for the national political conversation that comes around at election time, make sure that you take part and help to make climate change a real election issue.

    More ways you can help to tackle climate change.

  • The world’s greatest bank job!

    Ian Sullivan explains how a tiny tax on financial transactions would raise billions to tackle poverty and climate change, at home in the UK and abroad.

    I’ve always been frustrated when I read about the credit crunch, global recession, economic meltdown, or whichever term you want to use. Thanks to the reckless gambling of the banks, our economy is a mess. But what if there was a way to turn this crisis into an opportunity?

    The world's greatest bank job

    The world’s greatest bank job

    What if we could repair the human damage, protect public services at home, fight poverty abroad and help foot the bill for climate change? Would you be in? And if we got to wear green masks, shoot pretend arrows and generally do cool stuff then surely we could build an unstoppable campaign.

    It may sound all too good to be true (not green tights – obviously). But if governments around the world introduced a tax on transactions between financial institutions then we could raise hundreds of billions of dollars a year. The between bit is important because that means it’s not a charge for us to get our money out the bank, or to get currency for our holidays, so they can’t just pass it on to their high street customers.

    We’re calling it A Robin Hood Tax. It would start at just five pence for every thousand pounds traded – an average of 0.05 per cent. Even such tiny taxes would raise as much as £250 billion every year.

    That’s more than double what the world currently gives in international aid. That money could be used to fight poverty, protect public services and tackle climate change. Sounds good doesn’t it. It’s world changing, it makes sense and it is possible.

    I won’t go into the ins and outs of how banking greed got us into this mess – there’s some excellent analysis by Professor Stiglitz. Basically, we have an opportunity to make the financial system work in the interests of normal people all around the world.

    As we slowly recover from the credit crunch we can’t just go back to “business as usual”. To steal a phrase from the bank that we all own, the Royal Bank of Scotland, “You deserve a better bank”.

    Support the Robin Hood Tax and we might just get it.

    More ways to take action

  • Why campaign for the Millennium Development Goals?

    Campaigning about the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) is a tough sell in the UK. Most people wouldn’t know their MDGs from their WMDs.

    In 2000, world leaders signed up to achieving 8 goals that could change the lives of millions of people throughout the developing world. If the goals are achieved we can end the scandal that 1 mother dies unnecessarily every minute in childbirth, that 75 million children don’t get the chance to learn to read and 5 million people don’t get life-saving HIV drugs as they are too expensive. (For more of an idea about them watch the excellent short animation below).

    Amazing, except that over the last ten years, rich countries governments haven’t stuck to their world-changing plan. In lots of European countries aid budgets – the best way to finance the delivery of the MDGs – are either stagnating (France), being slashed (Italy) or are perennially under threat from a hostile press (UK).

    There’s a big UN MDG Summit in New York in September and by then world leaders need to have designed a rescue package for the MDGs. They need to have reaffirmed their commitment to delivering 0.7% of their national income to aid by the MDG deadline of 2015. 

    Mwanambyu Regional Health Centre, near Mongu, in Zambia. Credit: Oxfam

    Mwanambyu Regional Health Centre, near Mongu, in Zambia. Credit: Oxfam

    Living without debt and dire poverty isn’t just a pipedream. In 2005, as a result of campaigning by millions of people around the world, Zambia had its international debt wiped clean.

    The result? Free healthcare for people in rural areas and vastly improved standards of health and life expectancy. In the last 6 years Zambia has managed to reduce malaria deaths by a staggering 66%. This is the result of free care and investment in health workers and provision to really make a difference to the lives of the poorest people in Zambia.

    Mwangala Moumbeloa in his office. Creit: Oxfam

    Mwangala Moumbeloa in his office. Creit: Oxfam

    Mwangala Moumbeloa is the only trained health worker in the Mwanambyu Regional Health Centre, near Mongu, in Zambia. When I spoke to him he looked tired. He has to be available for emergencies 24 hours a day, so it’s not surprising when he tells me that he feels under great stress.

    With up to 60 patients a day to see, it is clear that this health centre is a lifeline to the thousands of people it supports. He tells me how as recently as 2004, women had to walk for 5 hours when their labour started, and pay for treatment, to ensure a hospital birth.

    Before I leave, I ask him what the centre needs. He smiles and reels off a list including transport, communications and more water holes. So there’s more to do, but for me, this clinic is an example of what governments and people in developing countries can achieve with just a small injection of financial support, strategically placed to benefit the poorest people.

    If the MDGs are delivered, dozens of other countries can make the choices of places like Zambia, to transform countless lives for the better. But let’s not just imagine; let’s work to make these goals the reality they are supposed to be. This year, we need to make sure that our leaders start to deliver the MDGs.

    Take action: Join The Big Promise and tell world leaders to keep their commitments

  • Watch this: Idris Elba calls for Haiti debt cancellation

    You might know him better as Stringer Bell. That’s the uber-cool (that was a colleague who definitely isn’t) character, who has people in this office literally swooning, from hit TV show, The Wire.

    He’s also known, in the real world, as Idris Elba and he’s joined the Oxfam campaign to get Haiti’s debt cancelled.

    Watch the short video and then tell the IMF to cancel Haiti’s debt.

  • Climate campaigning: Where do you think we go next?

    How should we build the climate change movement?

    How should we build the climate change movement?

    Last year was full of highs and lows for climate change campaigning. We mobilised millions around the world in support of a global climate change deal, over one hundred thousand people took action in the UK with Oxfam and yet Copenhagen did not deliver. So we’re asking you, the people who make the campaign happen, how should we take the climate change campaign forward?

    Before we do lets have a quick whiz through some of last year’s big moments. From Dhaka to Doncaster, over 1.5 million people took part in our climate hearings. Then there was the summer fete at the Kingsnorth power station in Kent.

    And Oxfam supporters really made some noise. Anna Collins, volunteered for the ‘Adopt a Negotiatior’ project, she ‘adopted’ (tracked, met with and held accountable) Jan Thompson the lead climate change negotiator for the UK. They became quite friendly through the negotiation process. Jan assured her in the final couple of days [sic] “I promise we’re still really trying”. Before rushing off to keep trying.

    For many of us the year culminated in the largest climate change demonstration this country has ever seen. 50,000 people made up ‘The Wave‘ as it flowed through London.

    Charli Livingstone, an Oxfam supporter who cycled to The Wave from Birmingham, met the Prime Minister that afternoon. ‘The PM made it clear to me that he recognised the deal that we wanted and he said that he was going to Copenhagen with the aim of getting it for us. He didn’t get us our deal but I know one thing for sure; the movement for a fair, adequate and binding deal isn’t going away.’

    So we need to make sure that this year is even bigger, even better and even louder. Maybe there’s something we should be doing more of? Or something we haven’t thought of? Let us know, we’re all ears:

    What do you think Oxfam and our supporters should do to make even more noise this year?

    Should we focus on getting supporters to send specific one-off email actions? Should we put money into advertising and spread the word that way? What about producing educational materials for schools, colleges and the like? Or should we become a group of moles and infiltrate online message boards and spaces, taking the arguments to the darkest recesses of the internet? Something else?

    Give us your thoughts.

  • Video blog: Cancel Haiti’s debts

    Max Lawson, a senior policy advisor here at Oxfam, discusses why it is vital for a successful future for Haiti that the Internatrional Monetary Fund (IMF) cancels Haiti’s debts when international donors meet in Montreal on Monday.

    He also talks about why you should take this action and put pressure on the IMF.

  • Help Haiti today and tomorrow: Cancel the debt

    People wander the streets in front of the remains of a boarding school in the downtown area of Port-au-Prince. Credit: Frederic Dupoux/Getty Images

    People wander the streets in front of the remains of a boarding school in the downtown area of Port-au-Prince. Credit: Frederic Dupoux/Getty Images

    I’ve worked at Oxfam through all sorts of different emergencies. The Haiti earthquake somehow feels different from those previous disasters.

    I guess that’s because Haiti was already in a terrible state before the earthquake struck. Endemic poverty, weak government, weapons on the streets are just some of the ingredients that, compounded by the horror of the earthquake, mean that rebuilding Haiti, and helping the poorest people, will be such a massive task.

    Tell the IMF to cancel Haiti's debt

    Tell the IMF to cancel Haiti’s debt

    At the moment the world’s attention is focused, rightly, on the humanitarian effort. Leaders are pledging to stand shoulder to shoulder with the people of Haiti and help them to build a brighter future out of the rubble.

    World leaders and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) are meeting in Montreal, Canada, on Monday to discuss the world’s response to the devastation that the earthquake has inflicted.

    There is one thing they can do that can massively improve Haiti’s prospects. By canceling the country’s crippling debt the international community can help put Haiti on a stronger footing for the future.

    Even before this earthquake struck, Haiti was weighed down by the burden of debt. They already owed over $891 million to the IMF and other lenders. This is a legacy of loans from global financial institutions and donor nations to unelected governments of years past.

    The head of the IMF, Dominique Strauss-Kahn, has come out and said that the IMF supports the idea of cancelling these debts. That’s fantastic news. But like a lot of these grand statements, we need to see it turned into action before we can consider it a done deal.

    Following the earthquake, the IMF announced a $100 million loan to Haiti. They’ve subsequently said that this could be turned into a grant. But we need them to act now to make sure this happens

    If they don’t do this these combined debts would lock them in poverty for years to come. That’s why we’re calling on the IMF to act now to get rid of the debt – and we need you to email them and show your support.

    If these debts aren’t cancelled, Haiti will be sending tens of millions to the IMF and other international bodies even as it struggles to rescue and rebuild. If these debts are cancelled, the Haitian government will have a better chance to build their country, so that it is stronger than before.

    Email the head of the IMF Dominique Strauss-Kahn to demand that the IMF cancels Haiti’s debt immediately to make sure that earthquake relief doesn’t create a new debt burden.

    Take action: Tell the IMF to cancel the debt

    Donate to the Haiti emergency appeal

  • Tell the European Union to target some real emissions cuts

    Copenhagen: Not done yet

    Copenhagen: Not done yet

    The dust has now settled on the massive disappointment that was the UN Copenhagen Climate Change Summit. We’ve had a break, got our breath back, and we’re looking at how to move forward with this campaign in what is now a vital year. (More on that next week).

    Here’s a quick thing that you can do to kick off the campaigning year. The Copenhagen Summit “noted” the last minute agreement that was reached between the US, China et al but, like most of the important decisions, the detail was left out.

    A deadline was set for filling in the blanks, like how much emissions should be cut by. We want the European Union (EU) to offer a carbon emissions cut of 30% on 1990 levels, and to move to 40% as quickly as possible.

    Any casual observer can see that the whole climate change process needs reinvigorating after the hammering it took at Copenhagen. The EU needs to make this pledge to inject some momentum into the process and send a message that this year, they mean business.

    So, let the EU know that you want some real carbon emissions cuts this year, so we get the fair, ambitious and binding deal we’re still waiting for.

  • Time to keep our promises on health and education

    Through the MDGs all children should learn to read and write. Credit: Oxfam

    Through the MDGs all children should learn to read and write. Credit: Oxfam

    For the first blog of the new decade I want to take you back to the turn of the century. A time when we had Westlife at number 1, Tony Blair in his pomp, the prospect of the millennium bug and a plan by world leaders to tackle global poverty -the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs).

    They were trumpeted by the leaders of the G8 (the world’s most industrialised nations), as a great solution to the continuing scar of global poverty.

    However, we are way off track for meeting these commitments. If we don’t start to see some strong action this year then they will just become empty promises. And that’s where you come in. Take part in Oxfam’s Big Promise and send a message to world leaders that promises can and must be kept.

    Through the MDGs millions of people could be lifted out of poverty. They aim to provide, among other things, clean water, access to medicines and build schools. The short film below gives more of an idea of what these commitments are.

    The deadline for meeting these eight goals is 2015 but as things stand we’re nowhere near reaching them. Unless something changes dramatically, our leaders will break the promises that we made to the developing world.

    Millions of people in poor countries continue to get low-quality health care, or are forced to go without it altogether. Fees are too high, hospitals and clinics are too few.

    More than 72 million children in the developing world – the majority of them girls – are going without education. That’s more than the population of the United Kingdom.

    So now is the time to put pressure on our leaders and make sure that they can’t wriggle out, forget about or spin their way around meeting the MDGs.

    In some ways the new century has been a disappointment. I still don’t have a flying car or a robotic butler. There’s not much chance that I’ll get either of them in the next five years. But with the right will, us lot putting the pressure on and leaders, erm leading, we can reach the MDGs and lift millions of people out of poverty.

    Take part in Oxfam’s Big Promise