Author: Jihan Andoni

  • Dreaming of More Accessible Data

    In observance of Ada Lovelace Day, I’d like to share some thoughts with you on the research work we do here at the Center for Responsive Politics.

    I joined the Center about 10 years ago. What’s kept me here all these years is the dedication and the passion of the team’s members to the Center’s mission.

    Of course, this is not a convincing answer to my teen-age son who always wonders why his dad works fewer hours and makes more money than I do. Working long hours and during weekends certainly isn’t rare at the Center. The level of dedication to the accuracy and the quality of the data we produce is extremely high. With a small team and a great amount of work to do, sometimes I feel I’m working in a hospital emergency room, not for a non-profit organization.

    Each time during these long hours I introduce an idea for new data analyses, my colleagues joke that I must’ve had a dream about it. So, I want to share with you my latest dream: to compare bills listed on federal lobbying reports with the number of corporations or organizations that lobbied on these bills. The goal would be to make a connection between industries and legislation.

    Data, when it is cleaned and well organized, is a great storyteller.

    So, in the near future, when a visitor to OpenSecrets.org searches for information on a particular bill, he or she will likely be able to see the number of corporations and organizations that lobbied on the bill. The lobbying clients will be divided by sector, and the data will appear in a pie chart similar to the one here:

    jihanpiechart.jpgUnder another tab, visitors could view the top lobbying clients and their lobbying expenditures for this bill, which happens to be the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010. Furthermore, and under another lobbying tab, visitors may see the contributions from these lobbying clients’ political action committees and employees to federal candidates, leadership PACs and parties. For example:

     Donor  Cycle  Total $  PAC $  Individuals $
    Lockheed Martin
    2010
    1,634,177
    1,487,700
    146,477
    Boeing Co.
    2010
    1,520,430
    1,340,500
    179,930
    Raytheon Co.
    2010
    1,406,416
    1,361,500
    44,916
    Northrop Grumman
    2010
    1,160,865
    1,009,550
    151,315
    General Dynamics
    2010
    982,875
    879,900
    102,975
    BAE Systems
    2010
    641,365
    611,500
    29,865
    SAIC Inc.
    2010
    539,574
    452,250
    87,324
    United Technologies
    2010
    444,750
    429,000
    15,750
    L-3 Communications
    2010
    274,520
    256,800
    17,720
    Harris Corp.
    2010
    211,850
    188,700
    23,150
    Cubic Corp.
    2010
    113,250
    72,500
    40,750
    Alliant Techsystems
    2010
    99,087
    90,687
    8,400
    Mantech International
    2010
    98,024
    68,000
    30,024
    Finmeccanica SpA
    2010
    96,220
    72,000
    24,220
    European Aeronautic Defence and Space
    2010
    56,350
    51,500
    4,850
    Rockwell Collins Inc.
    2010
    49,600
    37,500
    12,100
    Dynetics Inc.
    2010
    47,750
    30,500
    17,250
    Davidson Technologies
    2010
    45,383
    0
    45,383
    Alion Science and Technology
    2010
    42,470
    33,100
    9,370
    Renco Group
    2010
    32,550
    0
    32,550

     

    Most projects at OpenSecrets.org start with similar dreams and usually end up as new features on our website to shed more light on the influence of money in politics.

    Jihan Andoni is the Center for Responsive Politics’ research director and a periodic contributor to Capital Eye