Author: Joel Bowman

  • Trade of the Decade II

    Guest essay: Daily Reckoning Group Research Project: Trade of the Decade, Part II By Joel Bowman

    We asked. You answered.

    We asked you, the Daily Reckoning readers, to submit your ideas for the “Trade of the Decade.” You responded with a flood of excellent responses. We regret that we cannot publish them all.

    Yesterday, we presented some of your submissions. Today, we present a few more. So without further ado, here’s goes:

    Reader B. Bundsen kicks off today’s selection with a call to “Buy stupidity; sell responsibility.”

    We like the thinking behind this one. It was probably considered “stupid” to buy gold circa 2000, right?

    “I think the short (US) stocks/long gold trade is still a winner,” chimes another reader, A. Urhina. “If I were pressed for an alternative I would probably go for short UK gilts (a variation on Bill’s short for the decade) and long well-balanced emerging market economies (are there any?)”

    A reader by the name of Anil opted for a wetter buy side recommendation.

    “Buy: Water Sector. PHO is one bet, but there are several others,” he writes.

    “Sell: Oil. Everyone expects oil to be more expensive, so my bet is that we come up with alternatives which reduces the demand for light sweet crude.”

    Next, an anonymous reader suggests, “[the] best bull trade of the decade will be medical records software companies. First they will sell the software, mandated into the market for a while, then they will collect for licenses and updates.

    “[The] best short position of the decade will be bonds – generally, municipal bonds; specifically, general obligations for California, Illinois, New Jersey, and large cities like New York, Philly, and LA.”

    C. Cummings, another reader, offered this pair trade:

    “Buy: Agriculture, and the more global the agriculture equity, the better. There are plenty of ways to play this, this most straightforward being DBA. Or 50% DBA and 50% MOO (my preference).

    “Sell: the US Dollar; this is probably going to be the trade of the century and not just the decade. Lots of ways to play this one too, the easiest being UDN, or long-dated puts on the dollar for more leverage. I prefer this approach versus shorting the government bills/notes/bonds because it is simpler and probably less subject to manipulation.”

    Government manipulation, Mr. Cummings? Well we never…!

    “Go long emerging markets,” was reader D. Dartt’s vote, “especially Brazil and India. Be careful not to load up too much on Russia and China. Short the Euro.”

    On a slightly different line of thinking, a reader named Danny suggests this simple long/short:

    “Buy small mammals, sell dinosaurs.

    “More concretely,” Danny explains, “Buy biotechnology (BTK) and sell utilities (DJU). Buy biotech because it will continue to grow very fast and eventually biotech will encompass nanotech and make a number of industrial sectors obsolete. Sell utilities because there will be a growing trend towards self-sufficiency, and more people will get off the grid for things like electricity and water. Affordable technology will make that possible. So big utilities will be the newspaper sector of the current decade.”

    Reader A. Slinkard suggests:

    “Short: Biofuels and US Treasuries. Both are dead ends. Buy: Natural gas and iron ore. Both have tremendous potential in the next decade.”

    A reader by the name of C. Gaylord offers an opinion sure to raise the ire of the goldbugs:

    “Let’s get EVERYONE riled up!” he writes. “SELL GOLD!! Gold has had a good run the last decade. It’s time for a change although gold will probably still go up over 4 times. Buy the three metals needed most that are just getting started in industry. Molybdenum, Lithium and Titanium. Moly – makes steel stronger. Lithium – for all the new Hybird batteries. Titanium – will be needed to make the strength of steel stronger so they can use less, thereby reducing the cost and weight of the new Hybird cars and airplanes.

    “Buy base metals that are underpriced: lead, copper, iron. There is one simpler trade,” concludes Mr. Gaylord. “SELL paper money. It will all be useless.”

    Another reader, John, suggests we “buy the makers of rose-tinted spectacles” and “short everything else.”

    And from Italy, Mr. Monticello reckons we ought to “Short 50% Euro and 50% Yen. Go long 25% each in bonds: Brazilian real, Turkish lira, Australian dollar, Norwegian kroner.”

    “Unless I have no brain,” writes another reader, D. Mol, “this is a no- brainer: Buy precious metals. Sell or short all bonds.”

    Then there’s this one, from Agora Financial Reserve member, M. Readling:

    “You are probably looking for something more specific, but a couple of years ago I told a less-than-perceptive friend that he should be long anything that can be packed up and shipped to China (like wheat), and short anything that couldn’t (like his house). I don’t know if he bought any wheat, or not, but he is still in that house. Judging from what he said the other day, maybe not much longer.”

    J. Scharp told us to “buy wheat and short Los Angeles real estate.”

    J. Pratt reckons we ought to go “Short 30-year US Bonds (real surprise, eh?) and long equally corn, soybeans and wheat.”

    F. Merciadri agrees: “Short Cities, Long Rural Areas.”

    “In simple terms,” adds another reader, Bruce, “sell cash, buy seeds! The cash in our hand – or more correctly the Federal Reserve notes – has been on a wave of popularity while completely devoid of any true value. On the other side of the trade is an asset class that has been trivialized by cheap imports and farm subsidies that have made it an asset we take for granted.

    “Food is a major expense for most of the world,” reasons Bruce, “and will most likely regain that position here as the correction continues. Farmland, seeds, livestock and gardening tools seem a sure place to put your cash. So long as the sun and rain continue, (things that the Government can’t tax or mess with), the planting of food crops is a fairly sure way of multiplying your value. With a few dollars spent now, the following years could be spent eating from your investment. Not only will you eat for a long time on the returns, but you will undoubtedly eat better, and the exercise and good food will make you healthier. This in a time of rationed health care will be even more beneficial.”

    With another trade straight from the ground beneath us, R. Sharp chimes in:

    “I like rare earth elements – mining and processing. This is currently a hot item because rare earths are essential in manufacturing high- performance magnets needed for electric cars and wind turbines, as well as for optical materials in advanced TV screens. China, which for many years has had a near monopoly on rare earth mining and production, is now limiting exports, a situation that is likely to get worse before it gets better.

    “Because of China’s monopoly in mining and production,” continues Mr. Sharp, “I’d look at mining ventures outside China, particularly by American, Australian and Canadian companies. One never knows about the future, but I like the risk/reward ratio here.”

    D. Wogstad agrees:

    “A market segment of interest that I believe holds great promise this decade is ‘rare earth metals.’ These are metals used to produce high- powered permanent magnets which in turn are used in motors and generators. With increased emphasis on alternative energy (specifically wind power) and non-polluting automobiles, there will be significant demand for wind turbine generators and electric motors to propel automobiles.

    “Unfortunately for the United States, this market is being cornered by the Chinese. But for the savvy investor, cornered markets mean skewed pricing and extraordinary profits.

    “On the sell side,” continues reader Wogstad, “anything in the ‘semi- luxury goods’ category won’t fare too well. The continuing demise of the middle class in the United States will curtail the sales many goods formerly aspired to by the middle class; jewelry, furs, boats, etc. I think this decade will be characterized by the middle class living within their now diminished means.”

    And finally today, a reader S. Carter sent in the following thoughtful comments:

    “Sell: Electric Utilities at peaks (well, don’t wait for peaks, just SELL!)

    “Premise: Essentially, fixed dividends based on a highly regulated model produce the equivalent downside of a long-term T-Bill with additional exposures. As rising commodity pricing, rapidly increasing health care/benefits expenses related to its workforce and generally expanding operating costs to keep an aging infrastructure functional. Add also the need to install extremely expensive mercury, NOx and SOx emissions controls on conventional generating stations, and the eventual cost of CO2 mitigation, and the average utility ratepayer is looking at forking out a lot of dough in the form of rate increases (+100%) with no visible improvement in service. Electricity is a commodity, and brand loyalty is a tough thing to achieve.

    “Now the tougher question: What to buy? Commodities, particularly oil and agriculture.

    “Premise: Peak global oil production coupled with massive increases in demand from India, China and other emerging economies point to severe shortages and higher prices to serve as the rationing mechanism. Supply and demand will be in balance when the cost of the last (i.e. most expensive deep salt or oil shale reservoir) barrel of oil produced plus a ‘reasonable’ return is recovered in the price, and the last buyer is willing to pay that price. Price elasticity is surprising with this commodity, and a double or triple from the current low ‘$80’s/bbl seems likely over the next 10 years. Add in the long-term fall of the value of the dollar, and you could see even greater upward pressure on oil pricing.

    “Global inventories of agricultural products are at the lowest levels in decades (listen to Jim Rogers), and tillable land is hard to come by outside of Brazil. Buy ETFs focused on corn, wheat, soybeans and rice (load up now – in fact, store some in your basement: Not the ETF shares, but the ag commodities themselves! That’s not just talking your book; it’s putting your money where your mouth is…)”

    Your Fellow Readers
    for The Daily Reckoning Australia

    Similar Posts:

  • Daily Reckoning Group Research Project: Trade of the Decade

    A few days ago, we introduced the first-ever “Daily Reckoning Group Research Project” in which we asked you, The Daily Reckoning faithful, to submit your selections for the Trade of the Decade.

    Specifically, we asked:

    1) Identify just one specific asset, commodity, stock market sector, currency, mutual fund, ETF etc. to buy and hold for the next 10 years. Please provide a symbol, if possible. But please do not provide the name or symbol of an individual company. (We are seeking to identify attractive asset classes, not specific companies.)

    2) Identify just one specific asset, commodity, stock market sector, currency, mutual fund, ETF etc. to sell short for the next 10 years.

    Over the following days, we received an intriguing collection of ideas, both on the long side and the short side. Not surprisingly, a number of clear favorites emerged. The most favored favorite of all was the identical trade that your Daily Reckoning editors also favor: Sell Treasuries.

    Coming up a close second behind selling Treasuries was the recommendation to sell the US dollar…or the euro. A large number of readers also suggested betting against the US financial sector.

    On the long side, the precious metals gained more “buy” recommendations from readers than any other idea.

    Typifying the hard money crowd, J. Proenca wrote:

    My suggestion for the Trade of the Decade is this: Buy Silver. Sell 10- year Treasury notes. I’m a Portuguese citizen trying to prepare myself for the end of the euro. I’ve chosen the Gold Miners ETF (GDX) for that goal, which is working well so far.

    Another voice from the hard-money crowd, F. Becker, wrote:

    Sell US Treasury debt and buy gold. I still think “buy gold” is the Trade of the Decade because the world is being flooded with fiat paper from every nation. All of this paper money is basically worthless. Gold (and silver to a lesser extent) is the only real money. The US is bankrupt ($12 trillion + debt and $106 trillion + unfunded liabilities) and all the while adding tons more obligations. The only choice for the US is default or hyperinflation, or a combination of both… Paper currencies will eventually be worthless, leaving only gold as real money.

    Sincerely, Dr. Ferdinand Becker, a faithful reader (sufferer, as you put it) of The Daily Reckoning.

    Dozens of other “sufferers” offered some version of the idea that we should be selling paper assets and buying hard assets like gold or silver. Curiously, silver picked up almost twice as many recommendations as gold. Even more curiously, almost no one selected platinum or palladium. Almost no one…

    Reader G. Presch wrote:

    Buy: Palladium in physical form (forget the paper). Why palladium? Obvious reasons on the supply side are: limited current supply, difficult to get out of the ground at a high rate, limited in-ground reserves. On the demand side: humanity simply needs it much more than gold (at least according to today’s knowledge of limited uses for gold). In my opinion there is little reason to have palladium priced vastly lower than platinum, but both should win out over the next 10 years, with palladium having the potential to gain twice as much as platinum.

    The precious metals were not the only hard assets to receive “buy” recommendations from Daily Reckoning readers. “Energy” in almost any form was also a popular long-side hedge against the demise of paper currencies.

    Reader G. Corey wrote:

    Sell any fiat currency. If I had to pick one, I’d say the euro. The EU has gotten itself into a pickle. It welcomed members it shouldn’t have, and it will pay the price. There is just too much variation among member states for all to live under one currency. And with the hard times ahead, people will at first flee the weaker currencies to the dollar. But even the old greenback is doomed. So I say short ’em all, but the euro especially. I think this will likely take the entire next decade to play out. And when it does, fiat currencies will be in shambles.

    Buy natural gas. It’s been beaten way down but will surge back over the long haul because the world will start to transition away from oil. Coal is too dirty, and alternatives are lacking (solar, geothermal, biomass, wind, etc. are useful only within a narrow range of activities).

    Reader F.M. Weld concurred:

    My short is the euro currency because the Eurozone simply has a quagmire of disparate national interests, as well as immigration problems that will become intermittent conflagrations (e.g., dominant Muslim population in southwest France; parts of Scandinavia, etc.). Please recall that warfare is not an unknown item on the continent. It will be far worse than anyone now imagines, and I’ll guess that the euro is going, going or gone at the end of the decade.

    My long is natural gas. There is a glut now (driving prices down) and huge reserves in the US and Canada; but within a few years we are going to crave a relatively clean energy source in politically secure areas.

    Do I get my prize now, or do I have to wait until the end of the decade?

    Francis, we’re afraid you’ll have to wait for your prize. An investment in natural gas may certainly excel during the coming decade. But will it perform better than an investment in Canadian farmland, as reader Brain Clark suggests? Or an investment in timber, as reader Ed Pok suggests? Or an investment in fertilizer stocks, as reader Jay Winburn suggests?

    Here are a few more…

    Reader W.G. Thompson wrote:

    Sell Obama (The Dollar); Buy Ron Paul (The Loonie)

    A reader named Bruno wrote:

    Buy: S.E.T.I. (Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence project). Why? When the private economy (households and companies) failed and went bankrupt, the public economy (governments) came to the rescue. But who is going to come to the rescue of the public economy when it’s gonna go bankrupt (within 10 years max)? Our only hope is to be bailed out by extra-terrestrial entities. Hence the need to invest massively in developing S.E.T.I!

    Sell: Everything you can (and buy gold with all the money collected). Why? In a world ravaged by economical, ecological and climate collapse, lone survivors will have to carry all their belongings, while in search of food and shelter. Hence the idea of having few, but valuable and easy to carry belongings.

    Reader T. Ritchie wrote: Buy Energy, Sell the Euro

    Energy consumption has never gone down for a prolonged period of time and with India and China about to transition their populations into major energy consumers we can expect about 1/3 of the world’s population to dramatically increase their energy demands over the next decade. Meanwhile, traditional energy sources are under production pressure, even at present levels of consumption (Oil and Uranium), or are caught under the anti-pollution/carbon movement (Oil and Coal). An interesting point that The Daily Reckoning has brought up is the connection between fresh water and energy. Soon energy is going to have to be used to produce fresh water. This will be just one more drain on already overtaxed energy sources.

    Selling the euro seems like the most obvious choice of many possibilities. Although I agree the US dollar is in a bunch of trouble, the euro nations seem to be in a similar predicament but without the perceived reserve status the US dollar has. Plus, they have to contend with a bunch of different governments all with somewhat different agendas. It sounds like a recipe for disaster. I think the US dollar is a sell, but I think the euro is a bigger sell that will pay off faster.

    And finally, reader R. Crawford wrote:

    Buy: Green energy. You know, wind, solar, geothermal, biomass, algae, etc., even including some inventions not yet discovered. For example, what about electricity generated from electromagnetic energy in the void of space – including in our atmosphere. It could happen! Also include suppliers to these industries, which often are the biggest winners.

    As for the best short, I have to look to the Chinese renminbi (yuan). The thinking is, as the world economy and currencies go through major swings in the near term, the Chinese will be “forced” to cut the renminbi loose from the dollar. It will soar briefly. But the net effect will be crippling to the Chinese economy, which by then will be in a bubble that even the US Treasury Department won’t be able to ignore. Net result will be a crash of the economy similar to the Japanese crash, and possibly the Western economies in the very near term. In 10 years, the renminbi should have bottomed out. The stronger Western economies will have survived and put themselves back on a road to overall economic strength and the Chinese, by comparison, will be picking up the pieces of their crash and trying to claw their way back into the world markets. Unless, of course, their central planners know a lot more than the US Fed and other Central Banks in the West, which actually isn’t all that difficult now that I think of it.

    Fellow Reckoners
    for The Daily Reckoning Australia

    Similar Posts: