Author: Josh Wolford

  • Twitter Now Supports Line Breaks in Tweets on the Web

    In how in the hell was that not already a thing news, Twitter has just added support for line breaks on the web.

    Before, users could only experience the great fun of fragmented tweets on mobile, but starting today you should be able to see line breaks on Twitter on the web.

    Now, you can properly view a haiku, or perhaps another type of poem. Of course, that’s the optimistic take on how people will use this ability.

    As you can see, this ability doesn’t translate to embedded tweets:

    But here’s a screenshot of what that tweet really looks like now:

    Let’s
    Just
    Hope
    This
    Doesn’t
    Get
    Super

    A
    N
    N
    O
    Y
    I
    N
    G

  • New Pope Chosen, @Pontifex Twitter Account Reactivated

    With a plume of white smoke, the papal conclave has just selected Jorge Mario Bergoglio, a cardinal from Argentina, as the 266th pontiff of the Roman Catholic Church. He will be called Pope Francis and is the first ever pope to hail from the Americas.

    And the Vatican wasted no time in reviving the dormant @Pontifex Twitter account, which served as the official account for Pope Benedict during his final months in the papacy.

    On March 1st, the @Pontifex Twitter account went “sede vacante,” or “vacant seat” upon the official resignation of Benedict. All of his 39 tweets were archived and the Twitter account was put into hibernation – not deleted like some speculated would be the case.

    The last tweet ever sent out by pope Benedict read “Thank you for your love and support. May you always experience the joy that comes from putting Christ at the centre of your lives.”

    And here’s the first tweet from the Vatican as they welcome a new leader:

    According to the Vatican’s social communication head, it’ll be up to Pope Francis to determine whether he wants to continue to tweet his message to the account’s nearly 1.7 million followers.

    “Obviously we leave all decisions to the new man. But we would hope that he might continue to use @pontifex, which would maintain continuity,” said Secretary of the Pontifical Council for Social Communications Paul Tighe.

  • Twitter to Launch Standalone Music Discovery App Born Out of Recent Acquisition [REPORT]

    Twitter is working on a standalone music app that could be released on iOS as early as the end of March, according to a report from CNET.

    The app will reportedly be called “Twitter Music” and will be built upon technology from music discovery service We Are Hunted, which was purchased by Twitter within the past six months.

    The barebones function of Twitter Music will be discovery. Apparently, the app will recommend music based on signals such as who the user follows on Twitter. The music will be powered by SoundCloud, and if that’s not available the app directs users to an iTunes preview. As of right now, no full streaming services like Spotify are a part of Twitter Music.

    Digging deeper, the app consists of a few other tabs. Alongside the suggested music that pulls personalized recommendations based on a user’s Twitter activity, there is also a #NowPlaying tab that will show you tweets from people you follow who tweet using the #NowPlaying hashtag (this is a fun little way to incorporate an old and popular hashtag). We can see this in action, thanks to a tweet from We Are Hunted co-founder Stephen Phillips:

    Other tabs include “Popular” and “Emerging” which will give users access to trending and up-and-coming artists and songs, respectively.

    According to the report, Twitter suggests that you sign in via Twitter when you open the standalone Twitter Music app, but it’s not required. Of course, personalized recommendations won’t work unless you’re signed in to the Twitter graph.

    Back in January, Twitter launched Vine, a six-second video app born out of another acquisition. Although Vine is Twitter’s app and works seamlessly with Twitter, Vine isn’t actually branded with the Twitter name and logo. According to the report, Twitter Music will be a Twitter app through and through.

  • Facebook Launches One-Column Timeline with More Focus on Interests

    It looks like the news feed isn’t the only Facebook product getting a major refresh.

    For the past few months, Facebook has been testing a one-column Timeline layout that puts all your posts in one, larger column and everything else like music, photos, recent activity, and other Open Graph actions on the other side.

    Today, Facebook is beginning to roll this new Timeline out to all users.

    The new layout puts all of your post on the right-hand side in a single, streamlined column. Everything else, like friends, photos, and more now rest in the smaller, left-hand column:

    Your About page is also getting a facelift, with more focus given to your interest (music, movies, books, TV, etc.) and the apps that deal with them. Each interest gets its own section, for instance “Movies” allows you to easily add films you’ve watched, films you “want to watch” and films you “like.”

    You can either manually add movies to this list or you can let apps like Netflix (which just opened up Facebook integration today) or Flixster do the legwork.

    You can also add custom apps to your Timeline to express what you’re most interested in, for example Instagram.

    “To simplify how apps are displayed on timeline, we’re replacing aggregations with app sections. Previously, only top-ranked Open Graph stories and aggregations would appear on timeline. Now, when someone adds an app section, it will appear in the same place until they edit the order or visibility,” says Facebook.

    If you want to add a specific app to your Timeline, all you have to do is click the “add to profile” button on you app section page.

    Facebook says that they will roll out these changes over the coming weeks, so be patient.

  • FTC Gets Specific on Guidelines for Third-Party Twitter Ads

    The Federal Trade Commission has just released some revisions of its decade-old online advertising guidelines, alliteratively titled “Dotcom Disclosures.” In it, the FTC lays out more specific rules for “space-constrained” ads, which you and me would probably just call Twitter ads.

    The new regulations add bits and pieces about all types of online ads – especially ads viewed from mobile devices. But it’s the new guidelines on “space-constrained” ads (most applicable form being ads inside tweets) that are really interesting.

    Of course, the FTC reminds us that all of the ad guidelines for all types of media apply to social media ads. Advertisers can’t hide the small print, and they can’t make it seem like the ad is not really an ad. But there are some specific guidelines for shorter ads, like the ones that appear on Twitter, that social media marketers need to know about.

    First off, the FTC says that you can link to all the fine print instead of having to say it all inside the 140-character limit. But if you do, the click-through page must contain all applicable information and it must get to the point pretty quickly:

    “When a space-constrained ad requires a disclosure, incorporate the disclosure into the ad whenever possible. However, when it is not possible to make a disclosure in a space-constrained ad, it may, under some circumstances, be acceptable to make the disclosure clearly and conspicuously on the page to which the ad links,” says the FTC.

    But about that link: the FTC warns that shortened links like “bit.ly/f56” or even shortened links with the world “disclose” in them like “bit.ly/f56/disclose[6]” could confuse consumers. Simply put, the link may direct the consumer to the product’s website, but they wouldn’t know exactly why. Plus, it may be hard to find the disclosure.

    Additionally, “space-constrained” advertisers run into another problem if their product is available to be purchased offline:

    “If a product promoted in a space-constrained ad can be bought in a brick and mortar store, consumers who do not click through to a linked website would miss any disclosure that was not in the space-constrained ad itself. If the disclosure needs to be in the ad itself but it does not fit, the ad should be modified so it does not require such a disclosure or, if that is not possible, that space-constrained ad should not be used.”

    Basically, the FTC is saying that if you can’t provide the fine print in your Twitter ad, and there’s a chance that a customer could buy your product offline without having seen the fine print, it’s best to simply forgo the Twitter ad altogether.

    Even if the ad tweet is able to achieve this, the advertiser still has to adequately disclose that the viewer is in fact looking at an ad. The FTC suggests that adding “Ad:” to the beginning of the message or “Sponsored” somewhere inside would be sufficient. But one popular Twitter trick, adding “#spon” to ad tweets, could not be enough according to the FTC.

    They say that it “might confuse consumers and make it less likely that they would understand that it is a disclosure.”

    Of course, we’re not talking about Twitter’s official ad product here. Sponsored tweets are clearly marked as ads by Twitter themselves. What we’re talking about are unofficial “third-party” ads that users are paid to post. Twitter already requires that these third-party ads properly disclose that they are ads. But the FTC has clearly decided that there needs to be some hyper-specific rules for these new space-constrained ads, which we’ll only see more and more of in the coming years.

  • ‘Craigslist Killer’ Convicted of Murdering Victims of His Phony Labor Ad Scheme

    In the conclusion to one of the stranger homicide cases to spring from a classifieds website that you’ll ever hear, 53-year-old Richard Beasley from Akron, Ohio, has been convicted of kidnapping and murdering three men that he found using a phony Craigslist ad.

    We first told you about this case back in November of 2011 when the Beasley and his then-16-year-old accomplice were arrested and charged with the murders.

    As the story goes, a South Carolina man answered a Craigslist ad for a general labor job on a 700-acre cattle farm in Noble county, Ohio. He said that he was told he’d be living on the farm, and thus was instructed to bring all of his belongings with him. When he arrived, two men led him into the woods and pointed a gun at his head. He managed to escape, but was clipped in the arm while fleeing.

    This led police to uncover the scheme, which they said involved Beasley and his accomplice placing phony Craigslist ads offering jobs to out-of-work laborers. The goal was to bring unsuspecting workers out to their farm, where they would rob and kill them.

    Police first uncovered one shallow grave filled with a body. Suspecting more victims, police eventually found the evidence to charge Beasley and his accomplice with multiple homicides.

    Beasley has been found guilty on all counts, including aggravated murder, aggravated attempted murder, aggravated robbery, grand and petty theft and ID theft.

    His younger accomplice, 18-year-old Brogan Rafferty, was tried and sentenced last November to life in prison without the possibility of parole.

    Beasley, a former preacher, will be sentenced on March 20th. The death penalty will be considered.

  • How Facebook’s New News Feed Was Reverse-Engineered with the Help of Users and a Bunch of Index Cards

    Sometimes, you just have to ask people what they want. And sometimes, since people are really bad at getting out of their own way and telling you exactly what they want, you have to make them figure it out for themselves.

    Thus is the story behind Facebook’s new news feed, which is currently rolling out to users very very slowly. Apparently, “user experience researcher” Jane Justice Leibrock used psychological and anthropological methods to figure out what Facebook users actually wanted in their news feeds.

    And she used a bunch of index cards and a big white wall the do it.

    First, she asked people about the biggest problem with their news feeds. A lot of people said “clutter.” It was quickly determined that “clutter” didn’t really mean that the visual space was busy, but that users were unhappy with the types of content that they were seeing from friends and pages.

    That’s when she busted out the index cards and sticky notes.

    From her blog post on the Facebook engineering page:

    We came up with the idea of multiple feeds, each with its own focus on a particular topic, type of content, or type of friend. It was a good start, but crucial questions remained: which feeds to offer, and which stories to put into them? Those answers required a second round of research.

    I didn’t simply ask people which feeds they’d like to see, because as any user experience researcher knows, it’s very difficult for people to predict what they’ll end up liking. Instead I needed to come up with a way for people to show me — not tell me — which feeds would be valuable. I chose a method known as a “card sort,” which researchers usually turn to in order to understand how people mentally relate different topics to each other. But as we often do in research at Facebook, I adapted the method for a different purpose: to get people to reverse-engineer the feeds they’d find interesting. I gave each participant a stack of recent stories from their feed, printed out on paper, and asked them to pick out the ones that interested them and discard the rest. Next, I asked them to sort the remaining, interesting stories by putting them into piles separated by what they liked about each.

    Apparently, there were overarching themes to how people organized the stories: photos, posts from close friends, and (surprisingly to Leibrock) posts related to their interests.

    And that’s where the multiple feeds were born, from this reverse engineering. Check out the full post here if you want to go a bit deeper into Facebook’s thinking behind the new news feed.

  • Here’s What St. Paddy’s Day Will Look Like Through Google Glass

    This time next year, millions of people will be drinking themselves stupid by 10:00 am on St. Patrick’s Day. The only difference between this year and next year is that next year, thousands could be living the experience through Google Glass.

    Here’s what that might look like (NSFW language):

    [stuntbear]

  • Facebook No Longer Lets You Unlike Pages Directly from the New News Feed

    It appears that Facebook has made a small tweak as a part of the new news feed, which is currently in the middle of a slow, delicate rollout.

    It appears that Facebook is putting an obstacle between users and their ability to unlike pages that they follow. Well, Facebook hasn’t really added anything – they’ve removed a shortcut which pretty much amounts to the same result.

    Anyway, users of the new news feed are no longer given the option to unlike a page directly after hiding one of the page’s post inside the news feed.

    After hiding a post in the old new feed, here’s what it looks like:

    Now, here’s what it looks like with the new news feed:

    Notice that the unlike link is gone?

    Now, if a user wants to unlike a page (and they very well might, since they’re hiding posts from that page), they’ll have to visit the page first and unlike it from there.

    This could simply be an accidental removal – the new news feed is still in beta. But if we assume that Facebook has done this purposefully and permanently, it suggests that Facebook is doing all they can to keep people liking things. Because without all of those likes, how would Facebook know anything about users for targeting purposes? Sure, a user can hide a page’s posts – but if that like remains then Facebook retains that specific crumb of data. And every little crumb matters.

    As Inside Facebook points out, this could also lead to page owners seeing less reach from their posts, even though likes seem to be staying stable or even increasing.

    I’ve reached out to Facebook and will update when I hear back.

  • Netflix/Facebook Sharing Rolls Out Today in the U.S.

    Starting today, Netflix Instant users in the U.S. will finally be able to share what they’re watching with their Facebook friends. The social sharing, made possible by the passage of the amended VPPA in January, is now in rollout mode.

    Netflix will start rolling out the new social features today, and they say that all 27 million U.S. users will have access to the Facebook sharing by the end of this week.

    The Netflix/Facebook partnership, which has already been available in other countries for some time, will allow U.S. users to opt in. Those that do will see “Friends Favorites” and “Watched by Your Friends” sections on their Netflix accounts. Netflix streamers will be able to posts about movies and TV that they’re watching and comment on it as well.

    “You are in control of what gets shared. You can choose not to share a specific title by clicking the “Don’t Share This” button in the player. You can also visit your “Social Settings” in “Your Account” on Netflix.com to turn on additional sharing to Facebook or stop sharing altogether,” says Netflix

    The new social layer was made possible by an update to the Video Privacy Protection Act, a 1988 law that barred the sharing of any video rental history without the viewer’s expressed consent. The law, which originally focused on VHS rentals, disallowed companies like Netflix from giving users the option to share their viewing history on social sites like Facebook.

    Netflix lobbied Congress to update the law, and it finally payed off when both the House and the Senate passed the amended VPPA a few days before Christmas last year. President Obama signed it into law in early January.

    And it looks like it’s only taken Netflix a couple of months to begin the rollout of these new social features.

    The amended VPPA makes sure that the “rental company” (Netflix) gives users a “clear and conspicuous” option to not share their streaming history, and that the viewers permission to share their video history expires after 2 years unless they renew it.

  • Breaking Bad Is Your Favorite TV Marathon as Users Vote in Netflix’s First Ever Flixies

    Late last month, Netflix announced the first ever Flixie awards, which asked users to vote on their favorite TV shows and movies available on the Netflix Instant catalog. The awards featured some untraditional categories like “Best Bromance” and “Best Hangover Cure.”

    Now, your votes are in and Netflix has released the results of the contest.

    Without further ado, here are your gold, silver, and bronze finishers in each category:

    Best TV Marathon: 1) Breaking Bad 2) Battlestar Galactica 3) House of Cards

    Best PMS Drama: 1) Grey’s Anatomy 2) Glee 3) Friday Night Lights

    Best Guilty Pleasure: 1) The Vampire Diaries 2) Buffy the Vampire Slayer 3) Transformers: Dark of the Moon

    Best Bromance: 1) Blue Mountain State 2) The League 3) Top Gear

    Best Hangover Cure: 1) How I Met Your Mother 2) Arrested Development 3) Family Guy

    Best Commute Shrtner: 1) Mythbusters 2) Louis C.K.: Chewed Up 3) Portlandia

    Best Tantrum Tamer: 1) The Muppet Movie 2) Phineas and Ferb 3) Dr. Seuss’ The Lorax

    Well, there are some pretty solid choices here – especially that Best TV Marathon category. If you started from the top and streamed Breaking Bad, followed by Battlestar Galactica and House of Cards, you’d have yourself a very entertaining two weeks or so, depending on your real-life obligations.

  • Matt Cutts: Panda Update Coming Friday, ‘Big’ Penguin Update Later This Year

    According to Google webspam head Matt Cutts, we can expect the next Panda refresh to occur within the next few days.

    Speaking at the SMX conference, Cutts said that the next Panda update will take place this Friday, March 15th or by Monday, March 18th at the latest.

    The last Panda update rolled out on January 22nd, and Google said that it affected 1.2% of queries. Even if a Panda update launches this Friday, it will have been the longest time between updates in recent memory. Google previously released a Panda update a few days before Christmas, and two back in November.

    Although the Panda refresh is coming sooner, a Penguin update is also on the horizon – and Cutts said that it’ll be a big one. Cutts said that it will be one of the most talked-about updates of the year.

    They are “working on the next generation of Penguin,” said Cutts.

    More algorithm changes were discussed at SXSW last week. There, Cutts announced a possible crackdown on bad online merchants.

    “We have a potential launch later this year, maybe a little bit sooner, looking at the quality of merchants and whether we can do a better job on that, because we don’t want low quality experience merchants to be ranking in the search results,” he said.

    Check here for more on the future of Panda and Penguin in 2013

  • Microsoft, Like Amazon, Embraces Gay Marriage in a Product Ad

    It looks like Amazon isn’t the only tech company that’s finding a way to work gay marriage into their product ads.

    Last month, an ad for Amazon’s Kindle Paperwhite ereader featured a gay couple and made people on the internet argue, as these things tend to do. I guess only straight couples should be able to enjoy ebooks on the beach.

    Anyway, it appears that Microsoft is following in Amazon’s footsteps. Their new ad for Outlook leaves no room for speculation concerning the company’s stance on marriage equality. Check it out:

    Last month, Microsoft was one of the many tech companies (including Apple, Facebook, and Google) to sign amicus briefs supporting marriage equality. Later this year, the Supreme Court will decide two important cases on the topic – one involving California’s Prop 8 and one involving the federal Defense of Marriage Act.

    Microsoft was criticized way in 2005 for contemplating turning a pro-gay rights agenda into a neutral one. Eventually, the company decided to support a Washington gay rights bill.

    “After looking at the question from all sides, I’ve concluded that diversity in the workplace is such an important issue for our business that it should be included in our legislative agenda,” said Microsoft CEO Steve Ballmer. “I respect that there will be different viewpoints. But as CEO, I am doing what I believe is right for our company as a whole.”

    Since 2005, Washington has been on a path to marriage equality, eventually legalizing gay marriage last year.

  • Student Hacker Directs FSU Wi-Fi Users to Infamous Meatspin Video (For a Good Cause)

    A 26-year-old Florida State University student has been charged with “offenses against computer users,” a third-degree felony, for hacking the campus’ Wi-Fi network and directing users to an infamous shock site.

    Benjamin Blouin fully admits to hacking the network, but he says that he only did so to illustrate its flaws.

    Anyone trying to access the FSU Wi-Fi on March 1st was redirected from the FSU homepage to a “video of two men having sex.” To denizens of the internet, that redirect led everyone to the infamous shock video known as “Meatspin.”

    Meatspin, a meme from the mid-2000s (SFW), features a close-up of two men having sex with the Dead of Alive song “You Spin Me Round” playing in the background. It actually comes from a porno film from 1985.

    Apparently, Blouin says that he has been trying to bring the issue of network insecurity to the school’s attention for over a year. I guess he just needed something a little more shocking to get it.

    “Anybody’s identity, while they’re logged onto that network, could be at risk,” said our hacktivist.

    According to the report, FSU has shut off public access to the Wi-Fi network to “implement system upgrades.” Apparently, they will not require everyone to login to use the Wi-Fi.

    All I can say is that this is the most successful use of meatspin that I’ve ever seen. And boy, are they some pretty great comedic opportunities associated with meatspin (risky click of the day award goes to…).

    [News Herald via BetaBeat]

  • Spotify Adds 1 Million Paid Subscriptions in Just 3 Months

    Spotify has tacked on a million paid users just a little over three months.

    That’s the word from SXSW, where the company has announced that they can now boast 6 million paid subscribers. Back in December, Spotify announced that their paid subscriber total had hit 5 million. In July 2012, it was 4 million. And back in January of 2012, it was 3 million. If you do your math, you’ll notice that it took roughly a year for Spotify to turn 3 million in 5 million, but only 3 months to turn 5 million into 6 million.

    Long story short: Spotify is growing faster than it ever has.

    It’s not just paid subscriptions that are growing – total users are also up 4 million in the past three months, from 20 to 24 million. Of course, total users counts are great and all, but the big questions is how many unpaid users Spotify can turn into paid users with subscription-only features like mobile play, offline radio, and no advertisements.

    Spotify has made a few non-subscriber based headlines in the past few months. Back in December, they made a splash when they acquired the catalog of Metallica, longtime foes of services like Napster. In the past three months, Spotify has landed on a bunch of new devices like TiVo, Roku, and Windows Phone 8.

    And they just expanded the beta for their new web player in the U.K. The browser app should be making its way to the U.S. soon.

  • Facebook Announces Mobile DevCon 2013 Cities and Dates

    Today, Facebook has unveiled the cities and dates for their 2013 Mobile DevCon.

    This year, you’ll have three chances to catch the mobile developer conference: april 18th in New York, May 2nd in London, and May 7th in Seoul, South Korea.

    “We’ll have sessions for iOS, Android and Mobile Web developers. There’ll also be sessions dedicated for Product Managers. We’ll be covering Open Graph, social games, Mobile App Install Ads, and our mobile SDKs – but the focus is helping you grow your apps. In addition, there will be sessions on how we at Facebook build our own mobile apps,” says Facebook.

    You can also look forward to session with companies who have worked with Facebook and built for mobile like GetGlue, Fab.com, and Zeebox. The DevCon concludes with one-on-ones with Facebook engineers and product managers.

    Facebook warns that “this is a highly technical event – we’ll be deep in product and code,” but the event is open to any mobile developers, engineers, or product managers that are “at the sharp end of mobile app development.”

    Facebook says that they have over 680 million active users on mobile, so you know when you’re developing with Facebook you’re developing for a giant audience.

  • Here’s What It Looks Like When You Fall Down a Mountain

    This terrifying first-person look at a climbing mishap is your nope, nope, and triple nope of the day. Amazingly, the climber is moving at the end of this 100-ft.+ fall.

  • Vimeo On Demand Lets Creators Make Pay-to-View Videos with a 90/10 Split

    Back in September, Vimeo launched their new Creator Services suite, which they billed as a set of “simple, powerful tools to help creators make more money for doing what they do best.” The first part of that was the “tip jar,” which allowed video creators to set up donations on their video pages. At the time, Vimeo teased that paid videos were on the horizon.

    A couple of months later in November, Vimeo took a baby step toward that with a pay-to-view service complete with six movies released to their Vimeo Movies site.

    Today, Vimeo is launching the full video on demand service that will let video makers sell their work on the site. It’s pay-to-view, put squarely in the hands of the creators.

    “We’re creators ourselves, and we know how hard it can be to get your work out there and connect with an audience. Since we founded Vimeo in 2004, we’ve been dreaming of a world where more and more creators can support themselves with their work alone. Today we’re proud to be taking a big step in that direction, and there are many more exciting steps to come,” says Vimeo.

    Vimeo On Demand features customizable viewing options that let creators decide exactly how much to charge for their video, the viewing period (how long it can be viewed after purchase), and even where it can be viewed (regional limiting). Creators can also customize their Vimeo On Demand pages and sell the films on their own sites, using Vimeo’s framework.

    And the split is a flat 90/10. Creators keep 90% of the revenue generated by the views of their videos. Which, to a lot of artists, is a more than fair split.

    To get started with Vimeo’s new pay-to-view service, you must be a Vimeo PRO member.

  • What Are Your Facebook Likes Revealing About You? (Hint: It’s a lot)

    Is it possible that you are unwittingly outing yourself – as gay, as a conservative, as Muslim, or as a pot smoker – by simply liking stuff on Facebook?

    Sure, you could easily do this by liking the “Gay Men’s Alliance for Rolling Joints #420″ page (I don’t think this really exists, just an example). But that’s not what we’re talking about here. We’re talking about people being able to accurately predict your lifestyle choices and personality traits by simply analyzing the combination of things you like on Facebook.

    And by doing that, bring to light things that you may have purposefully tried to keep hidden.

    Have you ever had a problem or been put in an awkward situation because of something you liked on Facebook? Let us know in the comments.

    You may not think that liking a page like “that’s going in my status when I get home” would allow people to infer that you’re a teetotaler, or that liking the Weight Watchers page tips off that you’re in a relationship, but new research suggests that your likes (even the ones you may find innocuous) are much more telling than you may think.

    Baby, you like that?

    The study comes to us from the Psychometrics Centre at the University of Cambridge and was just published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences journal (PNAS). Researchers looked at over 58,000 Facebook users and found that they were able to accurately predict “a range of highly sensitive personal attributes,” including things like ethnicity, religious affiliations, sexual orientation, intelligence, drug use, political views, and more, by simply analyzing the subject’s likes on the site.

    For instance, using Facebook likes, the researchers were able to correctly categorize white vs. black 95% of the time and male vs. female 93% of the time. They were correct in their predictions about a users’ sexual orientation over 80% of the time, and could distinguish between Christianity vs. Islam in 82% of the circumstances.

    And as you may expect, the researchers were more accurate with their predictions when they had more likes to work with.

    “[E]ven knowing a single random Like for a given user can result in nonnegligible prediction accuracy. Knowing further likes increases the accuracy but with diminishing returns from each additional piece of information.”

    So simply knowing one thing that you like on Facebook could help someone determine a fact about you, like your age, gender, or sexual orientation. And the more likes that are available, the more likely someone is going to be able to predict many of your attributes (up to a certain point).

    Succinctly put, “individual traits and attributes can be predicted to a high degree of accuracy based on records of users’ likes.”

    What’s interesting is how the researchers made their inferences. “Few users were associated with Likes explicitly revealing their attributes,” according to the study. That means that the likes that tipped off the analysts weren’t blatant declarations of personality and lifestyle traits. For example, less the 5% of users that the analysts predicted to be gay liked specifically gay groups like “Being Gay” or “I love being gay.” The analyst’s predictions were based on much more subtle indicators such as liking pages for “Britney Spears” or “Desperate Housewives.”

    In other words, your likes betray you, good ladies and sirs.

    The researchers outline their nghtmare scenario as such:

    On the other hand, the predictability of individual attributes from digital records of behavior may have considerable negative implications, because it can easily be applied to large numbers of people without obtaining their individual consent and without them noticing. Commercial companies, governmental institutions, or even one’s Facebook friends could use software to infer attributes such as intelligence, sexual orientation, or political views that an individual may not have intended to share.

    One can imagine situations in which such predictions, even if incorrect, could pose a threat to an individual’s well-being, freedom, or even life. Importantly, given the ever-increasing amount of digital traces people leave behind, it becomes difficult for individuals to control which of their attributes are being revealed. For example, merely avoiding explicitly homosexual content may be insufficient to prevent others from discovering one’s sexual orientation

    Of course, it’s important to note that this is in no way exclusive to Facebook likes.

    “Similarity between Facebook Likes and other widespread kinds of digital records, such as browsing histories, search queries, or purchase histories suggests that the potential to reveal users’ attributes is unlikely to be limited to likes,” they say.

    But likes are unique in that, most of the time, the information in much more available to the public than a browsing history, for example. Facebook has over a billion monthly active users, and a good number of them like hundreds and even thousands of individual items of content on the site. It’s interesting (and probably unnerving to many people) that analysts were able to determine many personality traits with such accuracy simply by combing through a users’ liking habits.

    An outing on Facebook

    Likes aren’t the only kind of Facebook action that can “out” someone, exposing information that they wanted to keep private to the wrong people.

    Last October, we talked about a privacy flaw inside Facebook’s Groups that led to two gay college students being outed to their families.

    As the story goes, the two University of Texas students were added to a Facebook group called “Queer Chorus” by the group’s creator. As you’re probably aware, Facebook allows friends to add other friends to groups that they create.

    When the two students were added, Facebook generated a story about the event, which was published on their parents’ news feeds. Although both students had customized privacy settings that disallowed their parents from seeing certain posts, this story that they had been added to the “Queer Chorus” group somehow made it to their parents eyes.

    How?

    Simple. There are three types of groups that users can create on Facebook: Open, Closed, and Secret. And Facebook allows for friends to see that you’ve been added to Open and Closed groups.

    “Similar to being tagged in a photo, you can only be added to a group by one of your friends. When a friend adds you to a group, a story in the group (and in news feed for Open or Closed groups) will indicate that your friend has added you to a group,” says Facebook.

    “When a friend adds you to a group, you’ll get a notification right away, [and] you can leave a group anytime. To do so, just go to the group page and click “Leave Group” in the right-hand column. Once you leave a group, you can’t be added by anyone else unless you explicitly request to be re-added.”

    So, you can leave the group if you want. But there’s nothing to stop people from seeing that you were added to it (assuming it’s an open or closed group).

    There’s also a bit of misinformation when it comes to the notifications users receive when they’re added to a group. The notifications can make it seem like the user was only invited, when in fact they can appear in friends’ news feeds as having been “added.”

    Sounds a bit anecdotal, I know. But it’s just another example of how non-direct, contextual info derived from Facebook actions can be used to infer certain things about a user – often at a heavy price to that user.

    Likes, and privacy by obscurity

    As you probably know (although there’s a chance you haven’t received it yet), Facebook unveiled their new Graph Search product in January. With Graph Search Facebook is looking to index all of the data on their massive graph and make it easily searchable and cross-reference-able.

    With the unveiling of any new product, especially one involving search, Facebook is going to come under fire from those concerned with privacy. Facebook has made a point to reassure users that Graph Search will in no way affect their privacy. And in a way, Facebook is being completely genuine here. Basically, if a random person could find the info before Graph Search, they’ll be able to find it with Graph Search. If they couldn’t find it before, Graph Search won’t just suddenly throw it out in the open.

    Facebook is not changing any of the privacy details on any of your posts, photos, or likes. You can trust them on that.

    But there is something to the privacy concerns revolving around Graph Search. First, Facebook removed the ability for users to opt out of being featured in search results. This happened back in December, well before Facebook announced Graph Search.

    “Everyone used to have a setting called ‘Who can look up my timeline by name,’ which controlled if someone could be found when other people typed their name into the Facebook search bar. The setting was very limited in scope, and didn’t prevent people from finding others in many other ways across the site,” said Facebook at the time.

    Because of this “limited scope,” Facebook retired the setting. Now, everyone can be found with Facebook search. And since Graph Search is powered by “likes,” that means that Graph Search has made it easier for people to find information about you and your likes.

    Here’s how I explained the concept of privacy by obscurity then:

    It’s not that any of your information is any more public than it already was. Once again, Facebook isn’t lying about that. You’ll probably be found more often simply because Graph Search is a better search tool that makes it easier to find stuff.

    Previously, Facebook users could rest on the principle of security through obscurity (or privacy by obscurity, for our purposes). That line of thinking goes something like this:

    “Sure, I have some public information out there. But unless someone is specifically looking for it or for me, it’s kind of hard to find.”

    And that line of thinking is true, for most circumstances. If I wanted to find you, I would have to be actively looking for you. There was no real, reliable way to simply stumble upon your Facebook profile (with consistency), and definitely no way to find you based on your likes, photos, and interests.

    Now there is, of course. If I search “people from Hoboken that like Bon Jovi,” your name may pop up. I don’t know you, and I never would have organically searched for you. But Graph Search has led me to you, and your adorable puppy photos, and information on your penchant for fine wines and spirits. I basically know you now.

    So, what can you do about it? Luckily for you, Facebook provides a way to prevent other users from determining things about you based on your likes. All you have to do edit the visibility of your likes. Just go to your settings, access you likes, and you’ll find that each like group has an option to make itself private. This process can be tedious, but if you want to stop people from knowing everything that you like and making inferences from it, this is pretty much the only way. Other than quitting Facebook.

    Final Thoughts

    Of course, the big issue of the study is that this information was inferred from likes, not just any information available on Facebook. Even if you choose to leave the “religion” or “interested in” sections of your About page blank, there’s a chance that those things could be discovered simply by looking at public info on your likes.

    If you’re concerned about your likes giving you away, one simple but somewhat tedious solution involves changing the visibility of your likes – something that more people may be thinking about anyway thanks to Facebook’s new Graph Search. Another solution could be to simply be more careful with what you like. If you don’t want people to know/think that you’re a strict Christian, maybe you should stay away from liking pages that you think would tip it off.

    But the bottom line is that likes are one of the vertebrae in the backbone of Facebook. Likes make the world go round. And it’s nearly impossible to have a real Facebook experience without liking things. You can fine tune your privacy all you want (and that’s strongly suggested), but in the end, this is Facebook’s bread and butter. Being surprised that Facebook likes could possibly be telling of your personality is like being surprised that someone could infer your team allegiance from your Green Bay Packers jersey and that giant block of cheese on your head.

    Do you think about how people judge you based on what you like on Facebook? If so, do you care? Are you concerned about people discovering things through likes that you may have thought was hidden? Let us know in the comments.

  • Pinterest Launches New Analytics Tool for Site Owners

    After hinting at it for some time, Pinterest has finally launched its first web analytics product for website owners.

    With the (currently) free product, site owners can track how pins that come from their site perform on Pinterest. Site owners can see how many people have pinned from their site, the reach of those pins across Pinterest, and the traffic referred to their sites from Pinterest.

    The web analytics also show site owners info on the most repinned, most clicked, and most recent pins so that they can accurately judge what kind of content is most popular in the present. “For example, if you have a travel blog, you’ll be able to see whether people are pinning your ski vacation posts or beach vacation posts more,” says Pinterest.

    The new Pinterest Web Analytics is only available for verified websites. If you’re looking to verify your site’s Pinterest presence, check your settings page. Once you verify your site, click on “Analytics” in the menu on the top right-hand side (with Pinterest’s new look). And that’s it. The service is currently free to any and all verified profiles.

    “Today’s announcement builds on the set of tools we offer for website owners including business accounts, Pin It buttons and board widgets. We think that these tools will help website owners understand what’s working for them and what’s not so that they can create even better pins in the future. We even updated our business site with new tips and case studies to make things easier. Over the coming months, we hope to add new tools and more detailed insights, so let us know what else you would like to see,” says Pinterest.

    It’s no secret that Pinterest is looking for ways to monetize, and slowly implementing more tools for businesses on the site is a first step. Laying down the groundwork for personalized analytics could help Pinterest show businesses the value of the service, if and when the site choose to get into the advertising game. Plus, the analytics service by itself could possibly generate revenue for Pinterest, considering the company keeps expanding its features so that it could offer additional services for a premium fee.