Author: Kevin C. Tofel

  • iPad Arrives April 3 — You Might Need to Hold It First

    If you believe in magic and live in the U.S., you can pre-order it on March 12 in the form an Apple iPad. It is, after all, “magical and revolutionary,” says Apple. Either the Wi-Fi or the Wi-Fi 3G models can be pre-ordered, but only the Wi-Fi model will be appearing on April 3. Late April is the target for the 3G devices and for delivery of either model in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Spain, Switzerland and the UK.

    So while there’s no specific updates to the iPad features, specs or functionality, the availability and pre-order dates beg the question of who’s buying. Over at GigaOm, we’re running a poll on that topic, but I’ve added it here for our readers. As much as I agree with the “it’s just a big iPod Touch” sentiment, I think there’s still an unknown and that’s the experience brought by the form factor. This might be a device that you have to hold and use before making a purchase decision. I expect to do just that on April 3 before I decide. The iPad is already under consideration for my retooled mobile toolkit, especially now that I’ve dumped my iPhone. If I can get my daily work done in the the browser, it just might work for me and would let me use the iPhone apps I’ve already invested in. Since I now have a MiFi in my gadget bag, I’d be opting for a Wi-Fi model and simply use my existing Verizon plan for web connectivity as needed.

    Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Web Tablet Survey: Apple’s iPad Hits All Right Notes

  • Facebook for Palm Pre, Pixi Now Has More to Like

    While there’s no need to thank me personally, I’d like to think that I had something to do with the latest webOS (s palm) enhancements. How’s that, you ask? Call it Murphy’s Mobile Law — as soon you sell a device due to features you don’t like, you can count on those features getting fixed. Right after I sold my Palm Pre last month, we saw a webOS firmware upgrade and now there’s a new Facebook client. Joking aside, the real folks that deserve the credit are Ben Galbraith and Dion Almaer in the Palm Developer Relations team as they did the Facebook coding for webOS.

    The webOS Facebook app was always a sore spot with me. For starters, Facebook was on stage as an official launch partner when Palm debuted the Pre in January of 2009. By the time the device rolled out, all webOS users saw was Facebook contact integration — or contact overload, depending on your point of view — through Synergy and a mobile-friendly web version of Facebook. That “client” was very limited in terms of functionality. Some third-party apps showed promise, but I always expected that the best experience would come from developers at Facebook. Regardless, it doesn’t matter where the latest client app was developed — it’s out there in the App Catalog and based on Dieter Bohn’s video demo at PreCentral, I’d grab it I could.

    Similar to the Apple iPhone version of Facebook — by far, my fave mobile client for the service — the update for webOS includes a thumbnail view menu for News, Photos, Search, Inbox, Events and your Profile. Missing for now are some enhanced features like notifications, favorite friends shortcuts and video playback. But all in all, the update represents a huge step forward for the client. Based on what I see, it’s probably on par with the Android version I’m using daily with my Nexus One. Like I said — Murphy’s Mobile Law!

    Since I’m no longer a webOS user and some of you are — tell me what I’m missing in the new Facebook client. Was it worth the wait?

  • Why Did Opera Mini 5 Just Go Native on Windows Mobile?

    Long a staple on feature phones and smartphones alike, Opera Mini is now going to a destination that others seem to be leaving. While software developers like Adobe and Skype are focusing on Windows Phone 7 devices, Opera is staying alive and well with Microsoft’s current mobile operating system. The snappy little browser already supported Windows Mobile devices, but only those that include a Java ME client. Opera today announced a native, full-featured Opera Mini client for Windows Mobile 5 and 6 handsets.

    “The Opera Mini 5 beta for Windows Mobile includes the same rich feature set as the Java-based version. Renowned features, including tabbed browsing, the password manager, bookmarks and Speed Dial, are built-in to deliver convenience while on-the-go.

    One of Opera Mini’s major benefits is that it compresses data traffic by up to 90 percent, resulting in significantly improved page-loading and speed. This results in a dramatically reduced data load, which can translate to lower browsing costs when on a pay-per-MB data plan or when on expensive roaming.”

    Like the Java version, the native Opera Mini 5 is freely available, but it does have a beta tag — beta 2 to be precise. I doubt that will hold back many from the download. I don’t know too many Windows Mobile 5 or 6 device owners who aren’t looking for a better browsing experience, when possible.

    Not familiar with Opera Mini 5 because your phone doesn’t have a Java ME client? Have a look-see at how well Opera Mini 5 works. Since Opera is serving up compressed versions of the web through their servers — a privacy concern to some — it generally runs fast. And it shares many features with its big brothers — tabbed browsing, speed dial, bookmark synchronization with the desktop, and a password manager.

    Why would Opera build a native version for older Windows Mobile devices when others appear focused on future handsets? The number of pages served up through Opera Mini continues to increase into the tens of billions each month, and some of that growth has come through carrier distribution deals. Those types of arrangements can add to the Opera Mini crowd, but by supporting more existing devices, it’s an easy win. There are no negotiations with carriers or handset makers — just the approach of building a solid product that appeals to a wider audience.

    The browser already has over 50 million users, but there’s also millions of Windows Mobile 5 and 6 devices still untapped prior to today. Yes, there’s a fair number of Apple iPhone users too, but I’m not holding my breath that this version of Opera Mini will get through the App Store. With direct downloads to Windows Mobile handsets, Opera doesn’t have the same worry — they can just make the browser available for Windows Mobile. Owners of those devices certainly need to find things on the web, so more points of presence mean more searches. Google has been the default search engine on Opera for just over two years as part of a deal between Opera and the search giant. You don’t think Opera chooses to use Google for free, do you?

    If you’d rather take a test-drive of Opera Mini 5 beta 2 instead of installing it, you can try it in a simulator. You’ll need Java installed on your computer though — go figure.

    Image courtesy of Opera

    Related research from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Mobile Sites Show Little Improvement

  • You Draw, Google Finds — Gesture Search for Android

    One frustration some Android touchscreen device owners have is with keyboard entry. I’m finding the HTC keyboard that I added to be the best for my needs, but I’m always looking for input alternatives. I make ample use of the integrated search capabilities on my Nexus One, for example. Google continues to add alternatives and released a free new Gesture Search application in the Android Market — I’ve kicked the tires and I’m keeping it in my Android arsenal of tricks.

    Gesture Search is a Labs product, so don’t expect the results to be perfect just yet. My testing shows that it’s pretty good for contacts, bookmarks and apps, but not great at finding my music. Maybe it just doesn’t like my taste in music? The results should get better over time though — the app itself doesn’t “learn” your handwriting, but you can opt to send info back to Google for improving the recognition. At any time you can tap a result to take action — call a contact, hop over to a website, etc…

    Using Gesture Search is simple. Just run the app — it offers to put a shortcut on your home screen during installation — and write your search keyword, one letter at a time. Results are constantly updated as you write each letter. You can write on nearly the entire full screen of your device. The only exception is a short bar at the bottom of the display. That’s where your written letters are placed, much like the Tablet Input Panel on a Microsoft Windows Tablet PC. A right to left swipe in this area deletes one letter, while a swipe in the opposite directly deletes the entire word. It’s a simple interface that works well.

    In my example picture, I searched for our website. Within two gestures, the URL appeared at the top of the search results. I could have tapped it then, but I kept writing to weed out the other results, since many of them were contacts and phone numbers. I’d definitely recommend the small, 594 KB download, but bear in mind that like most Google Labs projects, it’s an early work-in-progress. I still find the speech-to-text search function more accurate for now, but options are nice.

    Image courtesy of Google

    Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

  • How Much 3G Data Is Your Smartphone Using?

    I don’t often look at my cellular phone bills, but I happened to glance at the latest one from T-Mobile. My first full monthly billing cycle didn’t show anything out of the ordinary, but the monthly data usage happened to catch my eye. I thought I chewed up more than 437 MB of mobile broadband, but I’m sure that T-Mobile keeps accurate records. After thinking over my usage patterns, I recalled the recent post James wrote in which he asked about Wi-Fi usage on smartphones. That’s when I realized my Wi-Fi pattern at the home office greatly impacted my overall smartphone 3G usage. But to really see how much of an impact there is, I’ve turned off the Wi-Fi radio on my Nexus One and I’m leaving it off for the remainder of my current billing cycle, which is about three weeks.

    I’m mainly curious what life would be like without Wi-Fi, as well as what the impact to the phone’s battery and the overall experience would be. Obviously, there are wireless hotspots all over the place and I’m not recommending that anyone walk down this path with me. Besides, there’s plenty of evidence that shows how smartphones are fueling the demand for Wi-Fi. This isn’t an attempt to buck the tide, I’m just experimenting.

    I’ve already seen one impact — the battery on my Nexus One is draining faster, although I did order a spare battery today — they’re now available direct from Google for $25 each. Having a second battery for devices is a common practice for me and not related to my 3G lifestyle. But when home, my Wi-Fi radio is active and I can stretch my phone usage through a full day, even though it’s my most used device when I’m not in front of a computer. But over the past few days while using 3G-only, I’m making it to around dinnertime with the device. That shouldn’t come as a surprise, but again, it’s nice to see some measurable indication of the drain. I’m not concerned about hitting any 3G bandwidth cap — the base data plans for smartphones in the U.S. are generally unlimited at this point. It’s the data plans for larger devices like netbooks and notebooks that come with the 5 GB monthly cap. With a larger display and a less-limiting operating system, these computers are likely to eat through more mobile broadband over the course of a month.

    Again, I’m not advocating anyone else wean their smartphones off of Wi-Fi. Why wouldn’t you use a free or low-cost alternative to 3G that’s often faster? But I am curious if you’ve looked at your own 3G usage. How much 3G bandwidth did your smartphone consume last month or during your last billing cycle? Is it more, less or about what you expected? I’ve broken the smaller amounts down into chunks because I suspect very few folks are actually using more than 1 GB of 3G data on their smartphones. Unless they tether for modem use, of course. ;)

    Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Everybody Hertz: The Looming Spectrum Crisis

  • Your Next Smartphone Could Be a Universal Translator

    One the largest impacts of the Internet is the reduction of communication and geographical barriers. With the web, we’re all becoming part of a global community more than ever before, but we don’t speak the same language, so for now, we’re reliant upon translation services. One of my must-have Google Chrome extensions offers translation, and while it works well, it’s more of point-in-time service that I use as needed with static information. On today’s real-time web, that poses a challenge — one that Microsoft is working on and showing off at its TechFest event.

    This video taken by Todd Bishop of TechFlash demonstrates a prototype, real-time voice translation service. Microsoft calls it the “Translating Telephone” but for now, it’s a demo voice over IP service used in conjunction with other Microsoft unified communications solutions. Like Google’s Voice product, Microsoft’s Exchange Server 2010 supports voicemail transcription. But Redmond is taking things one step beyond a standard voice to text service. The prototype shows a voice to translated text, using a conversation between an English-speaking caller and one that speaks German. It’s not perfect just yet, but the accuracy is impressive, as is the speed of the translations which are computer-spoken.

    While the hardware powering smartphones of today aren’t the best tools for translation, this type of service could be implemented in a client-server setup  – the two phones used for conversation would simply provide the audio, speech and connectivity, while a communications server processes the translations and serves them up. There would of course be a delay while the speech is translated, but it could be manageable. More likely to interfere with adoption is the sound of the voice — we’ve grown accustomed to hearing the actual voice of the person we’re speaking to on the phone. Phones with translation capabilities would make the conversation less personal due to a synthesized voice, but at least we’d be able to understand one another. Besides, I see a whole new market evolving — translation service providers could sell custom voices. I think I’d spring for an Angelina Jolie voice and I probably wouldn’t care too much if the translation wasn’t quite right. Sprechen sie deutsche, Ms. Jolie?

    Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

  • Ka-Ching! Shopping Drives the Touch-Friendly Mobile Web

    Are you tapping your way around the web these days? More of us are, thanks to touch-friendly devices and web pages optimized for them. But what types of sites and services are the most available for caressing? I would have thought news or blogs to take top billing, but boy was I wrong. According to Taptu, creator of a touch-friendly search engine, my money should have been on shopping and e-commerce. Based on Taptu’s Touch Friendly Web Report for February, we’re able to do more shopping with our fingers than anything else on the mobile web.

    Taptu built the results from a scan over 113 million sites and consider 334,800 of them to be “touch-friendly.” Shopping and services comprise 24.8% of that overall pool — nearly one in every four touch-friendly sites is a place to buy goods or services. How did my picks of news and blogs do? Only 3.3% and 1.3% of those touch-friendly mobile sites were news or weblogs. Good thing I didn’t place money on my picks.

    I wouldn’t have thought too much about this topic, but now that I’ve read the report, I recall a recent frustration with what I’d consider a touch-friendly site in the e-commerce world. I was having issues with a third-party Starbucks app on my Android handset and couldn’t retrieve the balance on my Starbucks card. Thinking I was smart, I just tapped my way over to the Starbucks site in my browser. Then I noticed how limited the mobile site was — basically I could find a Starbucks location, but I couldn’t check my card balance. That’s a function available on the less-touch-friendly desktop site but not on the mobile site. And although it’s not Starbucks’ fault, I couldn’t get the full site to open on my phone — the browser kept returning to the less functional mobile site.

    Now that I look through the Taptu report and see examples of true touch-friendly sites, I’m inclined to define Starbucks as only having a mobile site, and not a touch-friendly one. Yes, I can tap on the site, but that’s simply an inherent function of my phone and its browser. The examples that Taptu offers show rich interfaces that look more like native apps — not tappable hyperlinks, circa-2001. Here’s a sample from the report to illustrate — aren’t these appealing touch-friendly apps when compared to my example? I’m not trying to pick on Starbucks here, it’s simply a recent example. And this might even give the company some constructive criticism to enhance their mobile site.

    A few years ago, having a mobile site was considered forward-thinking. But as Colin notes at GigaOm, web developers of today have to consider how and where potential customers will access the sites. At some point in the near future, non-friendly sites for touch devices could mean no sale, which defeats the very purpose of expanding sales opportunities across hundreds of millions of handsets.

    Taptu’s February report is freely available and is the second in a monthly series focused on the touchable web. After you give it a read, let me know if the results surprise you. More importantly though — what’s your stance on third-party apps vs well designed web sites for e-commerce and content consumption? Have you ever taken your business elsewhere because of a poorly designed mobile e-commerce or service site?

    Image courtesy of Taptu

    Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Mobile Sites Show Little Improvement

  • Helping to Ease AT&T’s Network Pains — Goodbye iPhone!

    Last week I detailed how I’m retooling my mobile toolkit and today I took another step towards simplicity. I just got in from a trip to the local AT&T and T-Mobile stores and I’m essentially down another phone. That’s good for AT&T since their CEO, Randall Stephenson, today said that the carrier handles half of data traffic generated in the U.S. No need to thank me, Randall — just doing my part to ease the network congestion. Technically, AT&T didn’t even lose the account, but I’ll explain that in a few. For now, suffice it to say that I’m only going to carry one phone again. Last month, the Palm Pre went away and today for the first time since July of 2007, I have no iPhone.

    What I did was actually a little convoluted though and here’s where AT&T still comes out ahead. I found a location that had both an AT&T store and a T-Mobile shop within walking distance because I had a unique situation. I wanted to port my AT&T number over to my Google Nexus One, but I didn’t want to close my AT&T account. That’s a problem because porting a number from one carrier to another generally shuts down an account. I couldn’t do that because my wife also has an iPhone with AT&T on the same family plan. So I really wanted to port my number from AT&T but then have them assign a new number to my iPhone. This would allow me to avoid the ETF on my line so that one of our kids — who is now ready for a phone — could use my iPhone 3GS for the remainder of the contract. Like I said — a little convoluted.

    In the end it actually took two trips to the same AT&T store, but it all worked out. T-Mobile snagged my AT&T phone number in five minutes, which was key for me. I’ve had that number for nearly 10 years. While in the T-Mobile store, I increased my month-to-month plan from $59 to $79 a month in order to boost my minutes from 500 to unlimited. AT&T then assigned my iPhone a new number which is what my step-daughter will use when her birthday rolls around next week. Yes, she’s getting a used iPhone 3GS, but I have no doubt she’ll be happy. And Randall Stephenson wins as well, since technically, AT&T didn’t lose a customer. Of course, I wouldn’t expect my step-daughter to use gobs of 3G bandwidth, so AT&T probably comes out ahead on this deal.

    It may sound like I’m leaving the Apple ecosystem and its mobile platform, but I’m not. The fact is, I only use the phone function of my iPhone about 1% of the time and I have a perfectly good phone with Google Voice in the Nexus One. As mentioned in my toolkit post last week, I’m going to give the iPad a serious look to see if it will meet my work needs, which are activities like blogging, browsing, email and reading RSS. If I find that it will work, I’ll likely grab a Wi-Fi unit. If not, I’ll wait for an iPod Touch refresh which I expect to hit in a few months. This way I can still enjoy the platform and the apps I’ve purchased over the past two years. And there’s simply no point in buying an iPad with 3G when I have a perfectly good, nearly new Verizon MiFi on a month-to-month 3G plan. That little gadget offers online capability to the iPad, iPod Touch, my netbooks, notebooks and more.

    So goodbye for now iPhone. Maybe I’ll see you again real soon in a larger package!

    Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    How AT&T Will Deal with iPad Data Traffic
    Company Profile: AT&T
    (free)
    Company Profile: T-Mobile (free)

  • Crowded E-Book Market Makes Room for ASUS DR-900

    Quick — how many e-book reading devices can you name? Had I asked that question two or three years ago, most folks could probably come up with only a handful. However, that was before the “e-book-splosion” that I witnessed at this year’s Consumer Electronics Show. When an entire section of floor space is devoted to a device type at the CES, you know it’s a hot market. Even with a gaggle of e-book readers already available, ASUS figures there’s room for at least one more. ASUS today officially introduced the DR-900 at CeBIT in Hanover, Germany although it didn’t specify pricing or availability.

    The DR-900 is akin to Amazon’s Kindle DX due to the large 9″ display, but the resolution is a lower 1024 x 768. Unlike many e-book readers available today, ASUS opted to use a SiPix panel from AUO Optronics — AUO purchased a majority share of the California-based SiPix in May of last year. ASUS paired touchscreen functionality with the display panel and went with a minimal amount of buttons. That’s good and bad — good because there are fewer distractions, but bad because the page turn buttons are only on the right side of the device. Lefties will have to adjust unless turning pages via touch is an option.

    Like many other e-book devices, the DR-900 will support Adobe PDF, text files, MP3 audio and the EPUB format. Wi-Fi is included while 3G connectivity is optional. ASUS claims 10,000 page views on a single charge, which is stellar. I see the Bookstore section on the DR-900, but ASUS hasn’t announced a bookstore or any content partners. And that could be the Achilles Heel for some. While not everyone wants to be locked together with a content partner like Amazon, bookstores offer a wider assortment of new content.

    Although the e-book game is fairly new, ASUS is a relatively late entrant. The entire market reminds me of the early digital audio player days. In the late 1990’s, every company that could made an MP3 player and there were dozens of products to choose from, even thought they all did the same basic thing. Over time, the market matured and only a few brands survived as companies couldn’t differentiate their products or didn’t have the “holy grail” — a solid music synchronization solution. Is it just me or are e-book readers the digital audio player market all over again? And if it is, which devices will still be around two or three years from now? Google Books is nice, but I think devices tied to bookstores with fresh, new content will hold and maintain their position.

    Image courtesy of ASUS

    Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

  • Gmail Pop-Out Windows Get Super Fast (Unless You Run IE)

    I often get funny looks when I tell people that I don’t rely on many applications outside of a browser. But living in a browser empowers me with the freedom to use nearly any machine or operating system. It’s seriously liberating, especially for mobile device users. A common response to my situation is generally centered around how web apps just can’t compete with third-party code. I guess it depends on what you need to do. Email is one of things we all need to “do” — unfortunately — and Google continues to bring Gmail closer in functionality to standalone clients. The latest enhancement is a time saver for those that prefer pop-out windows for message composition, chat and more.

    Holding the Shift key while clicking a Gmail action — Compose Mail, Reply, or Forward — now quickly completes the action in separate browser window. And by “quickly” I mean darn near instantly. I’ve tested the function both in my personal Gmail account and in my Google Apps account for work. The old “Loading” message and progress indicator are nowhere to be seen in the new pop-up windows. The feature also works for Chat windows and is supported with Gmail shortcuts. Here’s a short list of supported pop-out mail actions:

    • Shift + C = Compose Mail
    • Shift + R= Reply
    • Shift + F = Forward
    • Shift + A = Reply All

    Two caveats apply for the new speedy pop-outs. These standalone views aren’t quite standalone. Closing Gmail in the browser will kill off any Gmail pop-out windows, which is the same behavior as before. Google says they’re working to make this behavior better, but I don’t know if they’ll ever be persistent outside of Google’s own Chrome browser. Speaking of browsers, that’s the other gotcha. The faster pop-out windows are only supported on Firefox, Safari and Chrome. Google explains that they tried to get it working with Internet Explorer, but couldn’t. I won’t speculate as to the issue, but it does make me wonder if Google is taking a standards-based approach for this solution. My gut says yes, but I’m not a developer, so I welcome any thoughts from coders.

    Image courtesy of the Official Gmail Blog

    Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    What Does the Future Hold for Browsers?

  • UPDATED: Apple Sues HTC for 20 iPhone Patent Infringements

    Updated: I’ve been wondering if and when it might happen and today’s the day — this morning I received notification that Apple is suing HTC for “infringing on 20 Apple patents related to the iPhone’s user interface, underlying architecture and hardware.” Apple filed the lawsuit with both the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) and the U.S. District Court in Delaware, which makes sense as HTC is a non-U.S. company. I’ve requested specific information from Apple on which specific patents are allegedly in question, but haven’t received a response as of this writing. I’ll put feelers out with HTC as well, but it could take the company some time to sift through the paperwork. My own digging on the USITC electronic document site came up blank.

    Without knowing what patents are in question, all we know is that Apple filed a suit. Well, we know what Steve Jobs officially said, as well. You’ll sense a recurring theme as this isn’t the first I’ve heard this quote.

    “We can sit by and watch competitors steal our patented inventions, or we can do something about it. We’ve decided to do something about it,” said Steve Jobs, Apple’s CEO. “We think competition is healthy, but competitors should create their own original technology, not steal ours.”

    Now that Android growth is really humming, the suit seems as much about Google than it does about HTC from where I stand. Google doesn’t make Android phones, but HTC does — it offers the largest array of Android handsets over any other phone maker. Going after HTC in this case is a roundabout way to go after Google. And HTC has often added iPhone-like features and functions to Android devices on their own, especially the ones that aren’t branded as “with Google,” making this suit a 2-for-1 special. Of course, I’m speculating on both of these points, but there’s a compelling argument to be made. Google is catching up to Apple in the smartphone market, due largely to HTC. While the suit could point out some HTC activities with their Windows Mobile devices, I think HTC and Google are squarely in the bullseye for this one.

    Update:

    All Things Digital found what I couldn’t — the filed lawsuit on the USITC site. I’ve scanned the documents and two specific bit jump out at me:

    “19. Certain HTC products imported into the United States comprise, include, or contain software based on an operating system known as “Android.” The products are referred to herein as the “Accused HTC Android Products.” Exemplary Accused HTC Android Products include the HTC Nexus One, the HTC Dream, which is sold commercially as the T-Mobile G1, the HTC Magic, which is sold commercially as the HTC myTouch 3G, the HTC Hero and the HTC Droid Eris.

    20. Additional HTC products imported (or that HTC intends to import) into the United States include digital signal processing functionality. These products are referred to herein as the “Accused HTC DSP Products.” Exemplary HTC DSP Products include the HTC Touch Pro, the HTC Touch Diamond, the HTC Touch Pro2, the HTC Tilt II, the HTC Pure, the HTC HD2, and the HTC Imagio.”

    Nearly all of the alleged infringements deal with interface activities and software functionality — items like remote access, using background processes and unlocking a phone through a gesture. Only the one DSP issue stems from the non-Android devices, so for all intents and purposes, this suit is squarely targeting the Google Android operating system used with HTC devices.

    Related content from GigaOM Pro:

  • How To Get 7 Home Screens on Google’s Nexus One

    While nosing around the web for some Android research, I came across a piece of software called Open Home. Mashable included it in a top Android application roundup this past weekend, but the software has existed for a while. The application takes the place of your default Android home screen, which is what you see when hitting the dedicated Home button. Technically, the button runs “Launcher” but for all intents and purposes, most people call it Home. The Open Home software adds a bunch of usability features, but I also noticed that it provides me with seven home screens on the Nexus One.

    Although Open Home is an $3.99 app, I’d really call it a platform. With it, you can skin or customize your Android interface, add Live Folders, shortcuts and such. And there’s tons of custom skins, fonts, icon packs for sale in the Android Market to enhance it. There’s even an experimental 3D cube interface in the latest version — as you swipe to other home screens, the screen rotates like a cube. I haven’t dropped the $3.99 just yet, but I did install Open Home Lite, which is free. It wasn’t until after installation that I realized the software adds two extra home screens to the Nexus One. I don’t have enough apps and shortcuts to fill up seven screens just yet, but I’m heading in that direction, so the extra space will come in handy. Each of the screens can hold a custom descriptive title as well — check this old but relevant video to see how one user categorized the screens on his HTC Magic.

    Aside from the extra home screens, Open Home adds dedicated search on the left and an interesting little slideout drawer on the right side of the screen. Simply tap and swipe the star to pull out the drawer. I’m thinking of placing the most used apps in the little drawer so that they’re available from any of the seven screens. And I don’t even have to give up my Live Wallpapers since Open Home supports them on my handset. Perhaps one of the best features of all — Open Home allows for home screen rotation to landscape mode, something I wish Android would support natively.

    I’ll be playing some more with the free, lite version of Open Home, but I’m already inclined to drop the $3.99 — it’s a small price to pay for two extra home screens and customization features.

    Images courtesy of Better Android Apps

    Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Google’s Mobile Strategy: Understanding the Nexus One

  • Hands On With Dell’s Mini10 Netbook — Should You Buy It?

    Intel outed the Atom N450 platform for netbooks near the end of December last year. Athough you can still find plenty of netbooks with the older N270 and N280 CPUs, the new N450 — and now N470 — offer slightly better performance while reducing power consumption. The energy savings comes from Intel’s Atom moving from three chips to two and this Pine Trail platform is fast becoming the standard for netbooks. The Intel GMA 3150 graphics solution is integrated into the chipset. Like many, Dell has already added the N450 to its netbook lineup and they sent me a review unit to check out the new Intel platform inside the Dell Mini10. This is my first look at both products.

    Overview and specifications

    The Mini10 is named for its display size, which is a fairly standard LED backlit, glossy 10.1″ display and 1024 x 600 resolution. The Intel Atom N450 powers Microsoft Windows 7 Starter Edition, which does have some limitations, but meets the needs of basic computing tasks. 1 GB of DDR2 RAM is included, as is a 250 GB hard drive spinning at 5400 RPM in my evaluation unit. The usual port suspects are also present: three USB, one wired Ethernet, microphone, headset, VGA and memory card slot. Two stereo speakers under the device near the front, 802.11 b/g Wi-Fi and Bluetooth 2.1 +EDR are also equipped in this model, as is 1.3 megpaixl integrated webcam above the display. This configuration comes with a 56 WHr 6-cell battery. The display hinges aren’t flush with the back edge of the device, which gives you a “lip” to carry the Mini10. And unlike many other netbook designs, the 6-cell battery doesn’t bump out from the device.

    Keyboard and Trackpad

    I like the edge-to-edge keyboard that Dell offers on the Mini10. A full six rows are available and all of the keys are sized and spaced normally. The keys are generally square, but have rounded edges making it feel like there’s more room between the keys than there actually is. I wish there was room for dedicated Page Up and Page Down buttons, but you’ll have to use the Fn key plus the up or down arrows. And there’s a quirk to the Function keys in the top row. By default, they control the hardware specific functions of the Mini10 — turn wireless on or off, change the screen brightness, adjust the sound, etc… In most cases, these are secondary functions and require the use of the Fn key. Not so with the Mini10. And the more I used them, the more I like the idea. I rarely use the Function keys for F1, F2, F3, etc… I typically need them to control hardware features.

    The trackpad is a different story for me and I’ll admit there’s some personal preferences getting in the way here — clearly I’m spoiled by the ginormous offering on my Toshiba NB205. The Mini10 trackpad doesn’t have separate mouse buttons — they’re integrated in, almost like the buttonless mousepad on Apple notebooks. But the Dell approach falls a little short for me. The buttons are only clickable in a small corner of the trackpad and I found myself clicking around until I found just the right spot. The small nature of a netbook trackpad likely has impact here, but in the end, it doesn’t matter to a consumer if it’s not working well. Of course, you can simply tap the trackpad for a left-click, just like you can on most other Windows computers. You can’t do that for a right click, however. On the plus side, the trackpad is wide and allows for easy cross-screen mouse tracking on the default setting.

    Performance

    I’ll talk about the overall performance “feel” of the Mini10 in minute, but let’s get the standard benchmarks out of the way. There are number of tools and suites to test performance, but since I have a history of device results with CrystalMark, I ran it on the Mini10. The full set of numbers is available here, and overall, the device earned 26,396 marks. Compared to the Toshiba NB205 which uses the older N280 Atom at the same 1.66 GHz, the Mini10 actually scored worse than the 29,309 of the NB205. I wouldn’t read too much into the numbers though — the Intel Atom N450 isn’t intended to add a significant performance boost. Instead it’s designed to offer a similar experience while adding a longer run time on a single battery charge. One other point worth mentioning — I tested the Mini10 with Windows 7 while the Toshiba device was running Windows XP SP3. All in all, I’d call the benchmarking a relative draw for these reasons. So why did I do the testing? If I hadn’t, someone would have asked me to. ;)

    So what about typical daily use — how does the Mini10 perform with the N450? It works just like you’d expect for a netbook although I found the 78 second boot time a bit slow for my tastes. However, I can run a browser with multiple tabs, play music and run another application or two without a problem. Sleep and resume only takes a few seconds. But like all netbooks, you start pushing the limits if you run half a dozen software titles and expect no lagginess. 480p Flash video with Hulu starts to cause frame drops and stutters. Full-screen mode is watchable, but not enjoyable — typical for most netbooks that don’t have a third-party graphics solution. Watching a 720p Windows Media Video file on the Mini10 offered a far better experience, so varied file types and codecs definitely impact performance.

    I now have Windows 7 on the Toshiba NB205 and overall, I can’t tell much performance difference between the new Atom N450 and the old N280. I’m sure there are subtle variances, but by and large if you asked me to pick which netbook had which processor platform, I couldn’t really tell based on the perceived performance. About the only way I could tell is by using both machines all day to see which one lasts longer a charge. This is where Intel is offering the biggest benefit in the N450 — the Mini10 is definitely an all-day machine with nearly 10 hours of runtime for the way I configure and use a netbook. (Note: I set my brightness to the lowest usable levels and use the most aggressive power management scheme.) That’s at least 2 hours more than what I see in the Toshiba NB205 with Intel Atom N280 — and Toshiba supplies it with a 63 WHr power pack.

    Dell specifics

    Part of the slow boot time could be due to some of the extras that Dell includes. McAfee Security Center is a startup process as is a custom Dell dock that resides on the top of the display. Granted, you should have some anti-virus protection running, so any third-party app in this genre can slow things down a little. And while the dock is nice — you can customize it with your own shortcuts, move the placement, etc… — I’m not sold on the value it adds on a small screen when the improved taskbar in Windows 7 is very capable. Still, it’s a nice touch with a “Mac-like” look and feel. Dell wisely hasn’t filled the Mini10 with “crapware” — booting brings a clean desktop aside from the Dell Dock and a shortcut for a 60-day Microsoft Office trial.

    Dell also uses a “brickless” power adapter. Usually a notebook or netbook adapter has a rectangular “brick” between the two cord ends. Not so with the Mini10. The “brick” is built in to the plug itself and there’s an LED indicator at the netbook end of the cord so you instantly know if the cord is plugged in.

    Conclusion

    Aside from the trackpad quirk, Dell offers a solid netbook in the newest Mini10. The Intel Atom N450 might not offer a performance gain over older netbooks, but it does provide a longer run-time — important for a mobile device. Folks that don’t currently own a netbook or want to add a new one to their stable should consider the Mini10. If you recently bought an N280-powered device and you’re happy with it, however, I don’t see a compelling reason to upgrade.

    Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Better Battery Life Motivates Mobile Chipmakers

  • Not Even the Powerful HTC HD2 to See Windows Phone 7?

    It’s pretty clear that Microsoft is making a clean break from Windows Mobile. Sure, the platform will be supported for some time, but the future is Windows Phone 7 and the standardized requirements for devices to run it. Do most Windows Mobile device owners expect an upgrade to the latest and greatest? Probably not. But what about the HTC HD2 — arguably the most capable current WinMo phone and certainly among the most recent? Even with the 1 GHz Qualcomm Snapdragon CPU, it doesn’t appear that an official upgrade will make it to this portable powerhouse.

    Natasha Kwan, a Microsoft General Manager in the Asia-Pacific region, tells APC Magazine that “[b]ecause we have very specific requirements for Windows Phone 7 Series the current phones we have right now will not be upgradable.” That statement doesn’t name the HD2 specifically, but Tony Wilkinson, Business Operations Director for Microsoft Australia, put a potential nail in the coffin saying “there are some hardware components that the HD doesn’t have.” There’s also commentary about the number of buttons on the HD2. Since it doesn’t have exactly three, it apparently doesn’t qualify for the Chassis #1 design as specified by Microsoft.

    I expect that the XDA-Developers site will end up building a Windows Phone 7 build for the HD2, if not other relatively new devices, so it’s likely that unofficial upgrades will be possible. Officially, I’d think it difficult for Microsoft to make an exception for the HD2, assuming it truly doesn’t meet the still-internal hardware requirements that Microsoft has. If it allows an upgrade for the HD2 then will owners of a Toshiba TG01 ask for it too? What looks like a clean break quickly becomes a fragmented mess in this case — which is exactly what Microsoft is trying to rectify and something that Google might be considering as well with Android.

    We have some current HD2 owners overseas and I’m sure some U.S. readers are anxiously awaiting the device on T-Mobile — any thoughts on the upgrade potential for this phone? What about for Windows Mobile 6.5.3 and older devices?

    Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    As Windows Mobile Stumbles, Which Smartphone OS Will Seize the Lead?

  • How I’m Retooling My Mobile Toolkit

    My house is like a mini gadget store. One day, I could be using a Windows netbook and the next day finds me pecking on a MacBook. When I get a phone call, multiple handsets often ring at the same time — up until last week, there were three active phones, along with several lonely handsets without service sitting on shelves. And if you need a spare USB cable, I’ve got just the thing — dozens of times over. Part of the pile is due to my full-time role and there’s no lack of evaluation products coming and going. But I’m a consumer, too. And the devices I use all day, every day are the ones that I purchase out of pocket. Any monthly service bills come out of my budget, too. Since I didn’t hit another jackpot in Vegas at the Consumer Electronics Show in January, I’m paring down my personal use items — not just to save money, but to reduce clutter and complication.

    Hanging up on some phones

    From a phone perspective, I’ve used an Apple iPhone since July of 2007. I turned over the original iPhone 8GB unit to the kids and bought an iPhone 3GS when the device hit market. I’ve thoroughly enjoyed using it and the only network issues I’ve experienced were when traveling. All in all, it’s been a very positive ride. But I haven’t touched the device in nearly six weeks, which is when I bought an unsubsidized Google Nexus One for $529. I’ve never spent this much on a phone — aside from the original, $599 iPhone — but the contract-free aspect won me over. And while the device isn’t perfect, it comes pretty close to replicating my iPhone experience.

    That’s likely not a true statement for everyone. Some are perfectly content, overjoyed even, with their iPhone and the iTunes ecosystem. And I’ve been one of those people for a few years. The overall experience that Apple brings is unparalleled right now, in my opinion. But Google is making changes to Android far faster than Apple is to the iPhone OS these days. The obvious argument is that Apple doesn’t have as much to fix — I’d agree with that sentiment. Android is catching up, however, and I believe that is has more momentum. That’s not to say it’s better or more popular – outside of the physics world, momentum is a rate of movement or energy. I think Google arguably has it right now with Android.

    Regardless of  market share and sales numbers, I find that Android simply works better for the tasks I do the most. I embraced Google services early on and the native Android apps for mail, calendar — and even for the phone itself with Google Voice — exceed the software on other platforms. To say Android is “best” for me and the way I work would be an accurate statement at this time. We all work differently and use various tools, so what’s “best” for me may not be “best” for you. So I’m dropping my iPhone 3GS, just as I recently did with the Palm Pre. That reduces my handset bills from three to one and leaves me with an evolving platform currently meeting my handset needs.

    (Related GigaOM Pro Research: Google’s Mobile Strategy: Understanding the Nexus One – sub required)

    3G on the run

    For connectivity, I’m still relying on two solutions — a monthly $10 Wi-Fi plan with Boingo and a Mobile Broadband account with Verizon Wireless. I use Boingo whenever possible — at bookstores, airports and coffee shops. I find the throughput generally faster than 3G and the data transfer amount doesn’t count against the 5 GB monthly cap of my Mobile Broadband plan. In the nearly five years I’ve used 3G, I’ve never come close to bumping against the cap, but I find the $10 Boingo plan to be cheap insurance while offering fast speeds.

    While I’m keeping my Mobile Broadband plan, I have made a recent change to the hardware I’m using with it. Since December of 2007, I’ve used a USB adapter — this allows flexibility to use 3G with any of my computers, regardless of the operating system: Windows, Mac and even Linux. My 2-year contract expired a few months ago but I’ve kept the USB 727 device and the plan, which is now a month-to-month deal. Verizon was willing to sell me a MiFi device (see our review here) for $50, but that would have required a new 2-year commitment on my part. While I fully expect I’ll use the 3G plan for the next 24 months, I’d rather have the month-to-month flexibility in case something that better suits my needs appears. Instead of buying a subsidized MiFi, I purchased a barely used one for about half the price of a brand new unit. Once it arrived, I activated the unit and swapped it on my account through the Verizon Wireless website. The process was simple, took less than five minutes and I’m still on a month-to-month plan. And now I can share my 3G signal over Wi-Fi with up to five devices. That’s important because I’m likely going to purchase at least one new device that only has Wi-Fi.

    (Related GigaOM Pro Research: Metered Mobile Data Is Coming and Here’s How – sub required)

    iPad or no?

    As someone using slate devices since 2006, the iPad has caught my eye. I’ve owned three slate UMPCs and each of them was at one point my primary mobile computer. I’ve toted them around as my traveling office, so it’s possible that I could do the same with Apple’s iPad. It’s not likely that most readers could or would take this approach — many folks still want or need a full desktop operating system environment and the software that comes with it. By and large, I don’t. I spend nearly all of my day in a web browser for basic activities — email, social networking, reading RSS and creating content for the site. I bypassed third-party apps for nearly two months during an experiment in 2008 and it’s even easier with today’s more mature web. But there’s still a huge question in my mind about the iPad — two, actually.

    First, all of my current mobile solutions offer multitasking and apart from the native Apple apps, there’s no indication that the iPad will support multitasking. Second, and probably more important, is how usable Safari will be on the iPad for the way I work and for the tasks I need to do. I’m hoping that as the iPhone OS platform is revised, the browser becomes a little more desktop-like. The current browser isn’t great for writing posts or reading feeds, for example. Part of the issue is the screen size of the iPhone, which of course, will be addressed by the larger iPad display. But using the mobile browser on sites designed for desktops might be a bigger challenge due browser limitations. I could mitigate these challenges with third-party apps, but that raises the multitasking question again. At this point, I’ll have to play with the device to evaluate its usage against my requirements.

    There’s also the “what will an iPad replace?” thought, since I’m ultimately trying to simplify. Although I love my Amazon Kindle2, I may sell it. The eInk experience is good but suffers in low light. There’s the valid argument about eInk is far easier on the eyes than an LCD screen and I’m not going to argue that point — everyone’s eyes are different. All I’ll say is: I read content on backlit LCD displays for at least 60 hours a week now and it obviously doesn’t bother me. And of course, my purchased Amazon content will still be usable in the Kindle for iPhone software.

    At the moment, I also have two netbooks that I’ve purchased — the MSI Wind and the Toshiba NB205. At least one of them can go away and, depending on how well the iPad works for my activities, possibly both. I don’t use either netbook as a primary device at home, but I do use them around the house, and of course, while out and about. Examples would be to supplement watching a NASCAR race on television — I often follow the in-car telemetry and race radio of some drivers through a paid NASCAR subscription. The netbook is perfect for that. Or I might do some basic surfing or online shopping at the kitchen table. Again, the netbook is superb here. Most often these at-home scenarios are content consumption activities in a browser. That’s a key use case for the iPad in a lighter, thinner package with a longer run time. For content creation, I could do what I did with the UMPCs — add a Bluetooth keyboard. Pending the browsing environment and capabilities, the iPad could conceivably replace both of my netbooks, simply because my needs are meager.

    There’s an added benefit too — the form factor. What I haven’t described is all of those times where I wanted to hold a computing device and not rest it on my lap. Or the scenarios where it made more sense to touch and interact with content. I used to do that with my UMPCs, but when I moved to the netbooks, I lost that ability. It’s one that enjoy with my Amazon Kindle and miss with the small laptop form factor of a netbook. It’s just not the same. Could I still do that with my UMPCs? Sure I could, but I expect that the experience will be better for me on the iPad for a few reasons. The device is thinner, lighter and easier to hold. The user interface is designed for touch. There’s far less “overhead” to slow things down — there’s a ton of great functions in Windows, but I simply don’t need them for this use case and they tend to slow things up when I need “bite sized” computing.

    So the “What does an iPad replace?” question is answered by at least one netbook, and possibly two. Perhaps my Kindle and for sure, my iPhone. After three years of iPhone ownership, the phone function is the least used one for me. And that’s replaced by the Nexus One. The iPad will still run the iPhone apps I bought and allow me to try new ones, so there’s a replacement factor right there. Again, I’ll have to see the iPad in person to make the final purchase and replacement decisions.

    (Related GigaOM Pro Research: Web Tablet Survey: Apple’s iPad Hits Right Notes – sub required)

    What extras go in the bag?

    Regardless of the main devices I run around with, there’s always a group of extras I take with me. I don’t foresee any major changes in this area, but I’ll run through what I carry and why. For any devices that can take them, I carry an extra battery and make sure it’s fully charged. That goes for netbooks, notebooks, and phones. I don’t yet have a second battery for the MiFi, but I see that they run about $40, so I’ll pick one up soon. I don’t carry AC adapters, so second batteries are like insurance. Could I charge the MiFi — or any other USB-powered device — with a computer? Of course I could, but then I’m simply draining the computer battery faster which is a net power loss. The other option is a small external battery that can recharge over USB — the NuPower unit I reviewed in December is a perfect example. These work with multiple devices, which is key.

    I also bring a USB cable and USB flash drive because you never know when you’re going to need one of those. Headphones are also a must in my bag. I find occasions where a mobile work environment is simply too noisy and some quiet background music can help alleviate that issue. I used to bring the Kodak Zi6 high-def USB camcorder with me, but phones are gaining higher quality video capability all the time. Both the still and video camera mode in my Nexus One is more than adequate in a pinch and reduces the need to carry a dedicated camera.

    (Related GigaOM Pro Research: Does Connectivity Have Us Diverging From Convergence?)

    What can’t I do with my mobile toolkit?

    I’ve always said that all things being equal, mobile technology involves trade offs. Add more processing power and you give up some battery life. Increase a device’s screen size and you add weight or lose some portability. There are exceptions of course, and the trade off gaps are diminishing over time — I remember when a small or nearly pocketable computer meant spending $2,000 or more. It wasn’t that long ago.

    Trade offs still exist though and in my kit, some still remain. I won’t be able to watch Flash video on the iPad. If I give up my netbooks, I’m giving up the vast collection of software available for the Windows ecosystem. And that NASCAR experience will still require a desktop operating experience. So yes, there will be activities I can’t do with my mobile toolkit. But I think looking at what I can’t do is the wrong approach. It’s what I can do while on the run that matters to me. If my gear meets my requirements for work and a little fun, isn’t that a win?

    Related GigaOM Pro Research (sub required):

    Read more: http://pro.gigaom.com/?s=mobile+%22battery+life%22#ixzz0h2gz9pKW

  • Should Google De-Frag Android, Get All Phones on 2.1?

    There aren’t any named sources to verify it, but Android and Me says that all Android handsets in the U.S. will get an upgrade to version 2.1. If true, that would be a huge step towards addressing the fragmentation problem that Google has faced up to now. Having at least four main Android versions in the wild – 1.5, 1.6, 2.0 and 2.1 — is bad for customers, carriers, developers and for Google. With these variances, nobody involved can guarantee or offer any semblance of a common end user experience. This is part of Apple’s strategy with the iPhone platform and also a key reason why Microsoft is standarizing requirements for it’s upcoming Windows Phone 7 series platform. And that raises a potential pitfall if Google does get all U.S. handsets on the same version of Android — performance variances due to various hardware configurations.

    Like Microsoft, Google actually doesn’t make any of the handsets for its platform. Instead, it offers the operating system to handset makers that create designs, often with input from carriers. Even Google’s Nexus One is only designed by Google — it’s built by HTC, who currently creates more Android handsets than any other company. And I doubt that Google created the design from scratch. HTC is known for creating handsets targeted for various markets that are adopted for carriers or a company like Google. With smartphones ranging in price from free after subsidy to $600 or more unlocked, the guts will vary in many ways — processor capabilities and speed, amount of memory to run programs, graphical prowess and more. With such a wide variety of hardware already out there, putting Android 2.1 on every handset simply can’t guarantee performance commonalities or capabilities. So in one respect, this move could actually hurt Google’s mobile brand at this point — the fragmentation issues might have splintered this opportunities success rate.

    Android and Me expects that most phones will see this upgrade in the second quarter, but like most phone upgrades, the carriers will be involved. Some cases could even require a full phone erase or wipe and might even need a computer for the upgrade process. I’ll assume that the common upgrade plan is true for a second — does it mean that the recent torrid pace of Android maturity will slow down? If not, then Google runs the risk of fragmentation all over again, depending on what’s planned for the Android road map. Slowing things down might not a bad thing. It could be time for Google to stop and take a breath so that the hardware can catch up to the software. Otherwise, we’re going to continue to see new and more capable Android devices hitting on a frequent cycle, which does nothing more than aggravate consumers who’s “top of the line” handset plays second fiddle to a new phone a month or two later.

    What do you think: should Google attempt to herd the cats and get all devices on the same base firmware?

    Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Mobile OSes Are No Longer Just About Mobile

  • webOS with Flash, Video Recording for Sprint Customers Today?

    Sprint customers with a Palm Pre might find an over-the-air webOS update today, with Pixi owners following over the weekend. PreCentral and a host of others noticed the upgrade plans for version 1.4 on a Sprint forum, but the post was pulled down. That could mean a delay for the rollout, but without an official announcement, the update really can’t be considered late, can it? Time actually is running out on two fronts, though.

    For weeks, folks have had expectations that webOS 1.4 would hit the airwaves during February. With the date being the 26th, that leaves the remainder of today and this weekend to meet that hope. More important, but related, is the time it’s taking Palm to generate handset sales and revenue. As James noted, Palm yesterday reset measures of the company’s performance. The cause? “[S]lower than expected customer adoption of our products,” said CEO Jon Rubinstein in a memo to employees that the Wall Street Journal got a hold of.

    Whenever webOS 1.4 arrives on Sprint — it’s already showing up on some GSM networks outside of the U.S. — it will be welcome. Based on the change log, expect enhancements to the Calendar, Messaging and Email applications as well as native video recording capabilities. The Pre will also gain support for an Adobe Flash plugin that will appear in the App Catalog. Unfortunately, Pixi owners are left behind for now when it comes to Flash support, much like Windows Mobile 6.x handset owners.

    There’s still no word on some of the basic items I’ve long wanted in the browser like a visual indicator of where you are on the page and support for anchor tags. And since I’ve abandoned the platform for now, I won’t know if those items are fixed. I’ll be living vicariously through you other webOS users, so let me know, OK? With my luck, all of my issues are resolved now that I’ve sold my Pre.

    Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    How To Clean Up the Mobile OS Mess

  • Hands On With a Sleek Universal Cell Phone Signal Booster

    The Sleek Universal Cell Phone Signal Booster from Wilson Electronics debuted last month at the Consumer Electronics Show. I took a brief look at it then, but recently received a review unit. Unlike a similar model I tried last year, this new version is less expensive, smaller and works with a wide range of phones and carriers. That’s all great on paper, but how does it actually perform? I use an iPhone to test the signal boost in this video and show how to put your iPhone into Field Test mode for a more accurate signal measurement method than counting bars.

    Although the Sleek is geared for automobile use, you could use the optional power adapter to gain a signal boost at home as well. Overall, I’m impressed with this $129 amplifier solution. Folks that travel in and out of coverage areas should definitely consider the Sleek due to it’s universal nature, multi-band frequency support and smaller size.

    Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Everybody Hertz: The Looming Spectrum Crisis

    Sleek-Signal-Booster
  • Novatel’s New MiFi Offers More “Fi” — 4G WiMax

    Now that it looks like 2010 will bring a sizeable coverage jump in large markets for U.S. WiMAX, Novatel Wireless is ready to join the game. Today the company announced testing results from a prototype 4G WiMAX MiFi device — bits and bytes traveled at a whopping 18 Mbps during the test, so the hardware is clearly capable of handling those fast network speeds. Will you see those speeds with a 4G MiFi? Not likely unless the 4G providers can offer it from an infrastructure standpoint. But if they can, Novatel Wireless says their prototype MiFi is ready — theoretical peaks of 30 Mbps down and 10 Mbps up are supported.

    Regardless of the speeds, I know that many of our readers are happy just to know that another 4G MiFi device is in the works. After James reviewed a 3G MiFi last year, he quickly purchased one for his daily use. Many readers did the same and have called the MiFi their “gadget of the year.” And why not when it’s easy to use — just press a button to connect to a 3G network which is shareable by five devices over WiFi. I’ve actually just added one to my gadget bag this very week, having bought a barely used device from Matt Miller. Since my 2-year Verizon contract for 3G was up late last year, I simply did an online activation of the new MiFi and swapped it with my old USB727 adapter. I’m still paying the same $59.95 per month, but can now share the data plan across multiple devices and I still have the freedom of a month-to-month deal.

    That freedom may be useful when the 4G MiFi devices from Novatel arrives. I could drop my 3G plan without an early termination fee and make the move. Technically, I could do that now with Sprint’s Overdrive, which is similar to the Novatel prototype — it too functions as a 4G hotspot with supporting coverage and falls back to 3G as needed. For now, I’m playing a waiting game because the 4G coverage isn’t where I need it. And regardless of coverage, there’s only one game in town until Novatel brings their product to market. By the time that happens we’ll know if Sprint and Clearwire need to put monthly bandwidth caps in place — at the moment, the 4G component of the Overdrive plan is unlimited. Clearwire is shooting to blanket 120 million people this year with WiMAX and as more devices like Novatel’s 4G MiFi and the anticipated HTC Supersonic phone jump on, there could be constraints imposed in the near future.

    How about it curent and prospective MiFi owners — are you salivating over the prospect of another 4G MiFi option?

    Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Everbody Hertz: The Looming Spectrum Crisis

  • How To Add a Secure Passcode to Your iPhone

    Are you one of those iPhone owners that just uses the swipe and unlock feature on your handset? Your phone isn’t really “locked” by definition — unless you have a passcode enabled, anyone with a pulse and a finger could get at your phone data. A nose will actually work too, even though it’s difficult — as an iPhone carrying runner who wears gloves in winter, I sadly have experience in this matter. Now you could add a 4-digit passcode to help offset data theft if your phone walks away. Simply hit Settings, General, and Passcode Lock on your iPhone to set it up. That’s a start down the safety path, but wouldn’t it be nice if you could use a stronger, alphanumeric password? It turns out that you can.

    UNEASYsilence points out the method that enterprise iPhone users have long since known — use the downloadable iPhone Configuration Utility, freely available for Windows or Mac on Apple’s website. The software is geared towards iPhone deployments in the business world, so there’s far more functionality than simply adding a secure passcode. But until Apple adds this functionality to the native iPhone OS platform — and I think they should — this is one way to make your handset more secure.

    Once you’ve downloaded the utility,  just connect your iPhone with a USB cable and then run the iPhone Configuration Utility. You’ll need to create a configuration profile by name and identifier like I did here.

    Next, simply click on the Passcode setting in the utility to bring up the passcode configuration screen. You see that I went hog-wild in this example with multiple attributes, but all you need to click is the “Require alphanumeric value” box for a minimal boost in data security. Adding in other attributes like I have will beef things up even more.

    After you modify the Passcode settings, you just need to install the configuration profile to your already connected iPhone. Find your phone’s name on the left side of the utility, click it and tap the Install button.

    The profile is sent to your iPhone over USB and to complete the installation, you just follow the prompts on your device. Once installed, you can disconnect your iPhone and you’re good to go with better protection of your handset data. And if you ever want to revert back to the basic passcode — or none at all — simply connect your iPhone, run the utility and choose to Remove the configuration profile from your device. After the profile is removed, just hit Settings, General and Passcode Lock, then enter that old passcode one last time and you can disable the lock for good.

    Related research on GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Apple Thinks Enterprise is Ready For the iPhone