Author: Lynn Sweet

  • President Obama, Michelle go to Sasha’s parent teacher conference. Pool report

    Pool report # 1
    POTUS and FLOTUS go to parent-teacher conference

    The President and the First Lady went on an unannounced trip to Sidwell Friends School, upper campus, where their daughter, Sasha, is a student. They arrived about 4:04, smiling as they walked into the school for a parent-teacher conference. Both were in dark overcoats. They stayed about 25 minutes before returning to the White House.

    Your Pooler warns local pool recipients that while the traffic is not as bad as it was yesterday or last week, the snowstorm is still causing delays. Even in a presidential motorcade, traffic was troublesome. Be forewarned.
    Motorcades otherwise uneventful. Well-wishers, including as cluster of excited teenagers outside the Friendship Heights Metro station, waved their arms and cheered. Motorists stuck in traffic, not so much.

    TK: Schooling Part B, in which the POTUS, hosting teachers and students, talks to astronauts in space.

    Susan Milligan
    Boston Globe

  • Why Robert Gibbs Tweets

    From the Wednesday, Feb. 17 Robert Gibbs briefing. Gibbs just started tweeting and he is asked why……

    Q Did you start tweeting because you felt that you needed some further response to all of the social media out there, that your message wasn’t getting across?

    MR. GIBBS: I had all this free time on my hands. (Laughter.)

    Q Oh, no, come on, give me a real reason.

    MR. GIBBS: No, I said this earlier — the truth is it was fascinating to watch. It was fascinating to watch you all in real time —

    Q — your voice wasn’t being heard?

    MR. GIBBS: No, I didn’t. I felt like — did I feel like it was a good avenue for our voice to be heard in? Sure. I thought it was — all of you are on and I’m reading now all of what you’re writing; I’m reading what you’re reading; you’re reading what I’m reading.

    Q It’s going to take up most of your day.

    MR. GIBBS: I have noticed that it takes up — it can be addictive. Trying to keep up, like I said yesterday, with everyone’s Olympic emails is a task that simply prepares me for college and professional football season.

    I will say this, one of the — I obviously spent time with the lawyers yesterday based on questions we got about the Presidential Record Act of 1978. And I know Mark wrote specifically on this. What I write and what I tweet is archived as a part of this Presidential Records Act of 1978 because it is work product created as part of my job at the White House. People that follow me, people that read that, people that retweet that, none of that goes into or is archived as a result of the Presidential Records Act.

    The only thing that would be archived other than what I produce is if you respond directly to me, and only me. It’s analogous to sending an email to the White House, which is already archived. So if anybody believed that — mentioning me, mentioning the White House, mentioning the President in any of the normal tweets that they do is of course not subject to the Presidential Records Act.

    Q What if you send something and someone retweets it and comments, like, “I agree,” or “I disagree”? That doesn’t go there?

    MR. GIBBS: If it only goes to me —

    Q — direct back to you.

    MR. GIBBS: If it only goes to me then it would be archived because it would be the equivalent of an email. But let’s say both of Mike’s followers — (laughter) — if you retweeted something I said and sent them to both of his, that would — neither of those two people would fall into the archives.

    I say this because Mike poked me a little bit yesterday for not having enough followers and —

    Q That’s kind of a violation of the ethics — (laughter) — say things like that.

    MR. GIBBS: Bill, I have to say this, Wendell had by far the best line, as we all know, yesterday. So that’s — yes.

  • Illinois GOP tries to foil Alexi Giannoulias phone briefing with demand: “Put Alexi on the phone”

    Below, from Illinois GOP…..

    Put Alexi on the Phone!

    “Voters want to know about his role in his family’s struggling Broadway Bank, and Giannoulias promised he’d provide those details after the Feb. 2 primary election. “If I’m fortunate enough to make it out of the primary, we can have that conversation,” he said. His plan now seems to be to stonewall until November.” – Chicago Tribune Editorial, February 12, 2010

    CHICAGO – Today marks the 20th day of Alexi Giannoulias’ silence since promising reporters he would answer questions surrounding his role in the near-collapse of his family’s Broadway Bank.

    On Sunday, the Chicago Tribune called on Giannoulias to finally come clean. Today, at 1:30 PM, senior staff for Alexi Giannoulias (including a former senior advisor to Rod Blagojevich) will hold a telephone press conference to test the waters with reporters and see if they can change the subject. After 20 days, it’s time to put Alexi on the phone – not his staff.

    “Alexi Giannoulias should stop hiding and start answering questions about Broadway Bank,” Illinois Republican Party Chairman Pat Brady said. “The Chicago Tribune is right, Alexi. It’s time for that talk.”

    Last month, the New York Times reported extensively on Giannoulias’ “hot money” investments, which may have directly contributed to last month’s FDIC consent decree with the Giannoulias family bank. In its editorial, the Tribune suggested Giannoulias sit before their editorial board for a 90-minute session to answer the questions he has dodged since January 28th.

    Key questions for reporters today:

    1) Will Alexi hold a press conference to answer direct questions about his role at Broadway Bank?

    2) Will Alexi agree to meet with the Chicago Tribune editorial board to address its concerns?

    3) Will Alexi agree to meet with other editorial boards around the state?

    4) Has the Giannoulias family met the FDIC consent decree’s 10-day requirement to immediately recapitalize $19 million – and did Alexi personally contribute to that recapitalization?

    5) Why is Pete Giangreco, a former political consultant to disgraced ex-Governor Rod Blagojevich, hosting this conference call?

    From the Tribune’s weekend editorial:

    The picture that comes to mind now is more “Look Ma, no hands!” In the four years Giannoulias worked for the bank, it came to rely heavily on relatively risky construction and development loans funded by volatile brokered deposits. It was an aggressive, high-growth strategy, and it was enormously successful — until the real estate market tanked, sending the banking industry into a tailspin.

    Instead of building capital to cover its high-risk lending, Broadway paid out bigger and bigger dividends — including more than $70 million in 2007 and 2008, just when things were getting really ugly. That’s one thing that has piqued voters’ curiosity. The Giannoulias family holds all the stock. Federal regulators have suggested that one way for the bank to raise the needed capital would be for the shareholders to make a direct cash contribution. In other words, put it back. If they can’t raise the capital, the bank could fail, leaving the federal government on the hook.

    As the New York Times reported, Alexi may have played a direct role in creating the current crisis at Broadway Bank:

    Construction-related lending jumped to more than triple the bank’s required regulatory capital during this period, and the loans started to go bad. By the time Mr. Giannoulias departed, Broadway was left with nearly $14 million in real estate on its books, more than 10 times the level when he arrived. Foreclosures take time, though — often about 18 months. And within two years of Mr. Giannoulias’s departure, the bank was left holding $38 million in real estate.

    The move into real estate coincided with a headlong push into brokered deposits. This is quintessential hot money — large amounts that jump from bank to bank, each bank offering the lure of high interest , which the banks then must fund by making ever-riskier loans.

    During Mr. Giannoulias’s time at the bank, brokered deposits catapulted fourfold, to $640 million. The typical bank at this point was growing brokered deposits at about 9 percent a year. Mr. Giannoulias’s bank was increasing its load by as much as 48 percent in a single year. Broadway Bank’s brokered deposits reached 80 percent of total deposits in 2006.

    No one knows for certain how big a role Mr. Giannoulias played in these decisions. As Broadway’s top lending officer, he must have influenced the move into construction lending. As a connected family member, he was probably present during discussions of the hot-money play. Certainly, he took part in the family’s decision to take out some $70 million in dividends from the bank in 2007 and 2008, even as it careened toward a consent decree with the F.D.I.C.

    Mr. Giannoulias told reporters that a time would come when he could answer questions about what happened at his family’s bank. Here is hoping there is plenty of time, because questions keep mounting faster than the troubles at Broadway Bank.

    The following citations are provided as background on Pete Giangreco’s role as political consultant for disgraced ex-Governor Rod Blagojevich:

    “They were in different worlds personally and politically,” said Peter Giangreco, a political consultant on Blagojevich’s 1996 congressional campaign and his two gubernatorial races. “They only dealt with each other because they occupied the same political geography.” (Associated Press, December 21, 2008, “Senate-for-sale case threatens new chief of staff”)

    Blagojevich consultant Pete Giangreco said that agenda resonated with voters. “It was a very clear choice for voters about doing things for people that will move Illinois forward or taking a step back,” he said. (Daily Herald, November 8, 2006, “Blagojevich rolls to win Despite talk of scandal governor bests Topinka”)

    ###

  • Giannoulias poll gives him 49-45 percent lead over Mark Kirk

    Briefing from the Giannoulias campaign–with the top advisors, not Illinois Democratic Senate nominee Alexis Gianoulias–is to start at 1:30 p.m. Chicago time

    Below, polling memo from the Giannoulias campaign……

    February 16th, 2010
    Alexi Giannoulias Continues to Hold Advantage
    Over Mark Kirk in Race for U.S. Senate
    To: Interested Parties
    From: Greenberg Quinlan Rosner Research

    Illinois Treasurer Alexi Giannoulias heads into the general election campaign with a 49 – 45 percent lead over Republican Congressman Mark Kirk in a head-to-head match-up.
    Giannoulias’ advantage is virtually unchanged from last summer and fall, before the hard-fought Democratic primary battle.

    Despite the fact that Kirk didn’t face a competitive primary and the Republican Party’s decision
    to begin their attacks on Giannoulias the moment the polls closed on February 2nd–Giannoulias
    continues to lead Kirk in a head-to-head matchup. In addition, 53 percent of voters approve of
    the job Giannoulias is doing as State Treasurer, while less than 30 percent disapprove.

    This will likely remain a close contest through the campaign season, but there is no doubt that
    Giannoulias is in a stronger position than Kirk to win the race.

    Table 1: “Thinking about the general election for US Senate in November of
    2010, if the general election for US Senate were held today and the candidates
    were: Democrat Alexi Giannoulias and Republican Mark Kirk–for whom would
    you vote, Democrat Alexi Giannoulias or Republican Mark Kirk?”
    (Percent responding)
    Giannoulias –
    Kirk
    February 9-14, 2010 49 – 45
    October 25-28, 2009 46 – 43
    July 28-August 2,
    2009 45 – 40

     Giannoulias leads among voters who know both candidates. Among voters who can
    identify both Giannoulias and Kirk, Democrat Giannoulias holds a 51 – 45 percent lead.
    Clearly, Giannoulias’ lead is not built on a name identification advantage.

    Alexi Giannoulias Continues to Hold Advantage Over Mark Kirk in Race for U.S. Senate

     2010 Greenberg Quinlan Rosner, All Rights Reserved. February, 2010
     Giannoulias expands lead with moderates. Giannoulias now leads Kirk by 24 points
    among moderates, an improvement from October when he led by 14 points among this
    key electoral bloc.

     Democrats remain more popular than Republicans in Illinois. Despite what we are
    seeing elsewhere, Democrats are still significantly more popular than Republicans in
    Illinois. Just 34 percent of Illinois voters have a favorable impression of the GOP, while
    46 percent have unfavorable impressions. By comparison, views of Democrats are
    evenly split (41 – 42 percent favorable-unfavorable).

     President Obama remains very popular in Illinois. President Obama continues to
    have very solid standing in Illinois. The President’s 59 – 31 percent
    favorable/unfavorable rating is as high as in any state we’ve seen recently. Even among
    Independents, Obama has a positive, 51 – 35 percent favorable/unfavorable rating.
    Sixty-four percent of Illinoisans approve of the job Obama is doing as President.

    The general election findings are based on a sample of 600 likely general election voters conducted February 9-14, 2010 conducted for the Giannoulias campaign. A sample of this size is subject to a margin of error of +/- 4.0 percentage points at the 95 percent confidence level.

  • Kendall, DuPage Illinois healthiest counties. Cook not so good.

    The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation released Wednesday new County Health Rankings in a project with the University of Wisconsin Population Health Institute. See the Illinois county rankings here. Kendall, DuPage counties ranked healthiest; Cook County is ailing.

  • Recovery Act 1st Anniversary: White House touts achievements. Transcript.

    THE WHITE HOUSE

    Office of the Press Secretary

    _________________________________________________________________________________________________

    For Immediate Release February 17, 2010

    REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT

    AND THE VICE PRESIDENT

    ON THE ONE-YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF THE SIGNING OF THE RECOVERY ACT

    South Court Auditorium

    Eisenhower Executive Office Building

    10:26 A.M. EST

    THE VICE PRESIDENT: Good morning, folks. Thank you all for being here. It’s been one year today since the President signed the Recovery Act into law, and I’m probably preaching to the choir here as to how beneficial it’s been. I stand before you, as I said, actually one day — actually the exact day to a year that we signed this act. And what I want to talk about is what we’ve accomplished, where we were back then, where I think we are now, and where we’re going.

    And you and I know without any question the Recovery Act is working. It’s working well, and maybe even most importantly, it’s working towards something. It’s not only helping American workers get back on their feet today but it’s laying a foundation for long-term growth for tomorrow — a little bit what we were talking about in the anteroom. And you’re the living proof of just what the Recovery Act is capable of.

    But the President and I, we realize that there’s still a great deal more to do. We know that every success story that you could talk about there’s another story about a man or woman who just lost a job, just been laid off, a plant that’s been closed down, a mortgage that’s been foreclosed on. We know times are tough for too many people and — throughout the country. I don’t find — I’ve traveled now to I think it’s 60-some cities talking about the Recovery Act, and every day, every community I go to, you can see the pain that some of the communities are going through — communities that were battered by the economy.

    I was just in Saginaw, Michigan. Through no fault of their own — I’ve looked into the eyes of those out-of-work teachers, out-of-work businessmen and women, small business owners, construction workers who’ve been laid off. But I’ve seen something else as I’ve gone through those cities and towns. I’ve seen a sense of hope and optimism as well.

    Just yesterday, as I said, in Saginaw, Michigan, I was with a gentleman who has his B.A. — his name is Gonzalez — Mr. Gonzalez. He worked for an automobile company and he got laid off. His wife and two kids were there at this event. But because of the Recovery Act and the job training program at a community college in his town, he went back and took a 16-hour course in being able to begin to deal with — 16-week course — in being able to deal with chemicals related to how they produced solar panels. And DOW Corning has a plant nearby. They added a thousand people over the last year because of some help they got as well, and in their great reach, he’s now working. He’s working at a decent salary. And that community college is going to train this year — another hundred people are going to go right from that training program directly to a job.

    The other thing I’ve noticed is — and I notice particularly from you all — and I use “you” in an editorial sense — is this emphatic, unrelenting belief that there is no reason why America has to be number two. None whatsoever. I find even that laid-off worker refuses to believe America is going to be number two in the world — whether it’s in ultimately the construction of wind turbines, or whether it’s in any other renewable energy form, or new automobiles and battery technology. I mean, there is this sense, there is this sense among Americans, even in these tough times, there’s no reason we’re not going to come out of this stronger than when we went into it.

    And so that’s what we’ve been having — we’ve been able to deal with. And the Recovery Act has just provided some significant degree of optimism. Rebuilding our crumbling infrastructure, sparking a clean energy revolution, transforming American health care, creating the best education system in the world — that’s our future.

    I always say to my friends who think — in politics who voted against this act — I say, any of you tell me how we can possibly lead in the 21st century with the same education system, with the same health care system, and the same energy policy we’ve had the last 35 years? Everyone knows the truth. The truth is that without a transformation in health care, without a transformation in education, without a transformation in energy, we’re not going to succeed; we will not lead the 21st century — which is an unacceptable proposition to the American people.

    But sadly, some of my friends who were willing to acknowledge we need to lead in all those areas and make transformational changes, they’re unwilling to take what I admit are difficult steps to make this transformation. They’re unwilling to step up.

    Well, not us. The President and I know we can do better. You know we can do better. We know this is a new economy, and there’s no reason why we won’t lead it. That’s why we think we have to usher in a new era of innovation and global leadership for America, and we owe much of the Recovery Act — behind the Recovery Act, which we don’t talk much about, is those elements of innovation and change we’re looking for. And we also owe it to the clear-eyed leadership of not only the President but many of you.

    I’ll conclude by saying that many of you have taken advantage of the sort of spark that the Recovery Act provides in some of the tax incentives and others. But we don’t think the government is the one that’s going to ignite this revolution we need. You all take a little bit of help and you go out and you risk a lot. You go out and you get some help from the government, and then you go out to capital markets and you’ve been out there and you go on the line for a whole lot more — a whole lot more risk. And we admire you for it. That’s the way we’re going to get through this.

    That, along with the President’s leadership — he’s the reason, in my view, why we stand here today with so much hope for tomorrow. His leadership has taken us very far from where we were last year. It’s easy to forget, the first quarter of last year, this economy shrunk over 6 percent. The last quarter of this year it grew over 6 percent. Something’s happening. Something positive is happening.

    So, ladies and gentlemen, I think the main reason it’s happening, at least in terms of government guidance, is because of the man I’m about to introduce: the President of the United States of America, President Barack Obama. (Applause.)

    THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, everybody. Thank you. Please, have a seat. Thank you very much. Thank you to Blake and Chuck, and thank you to my outstanding Vice President and his extraordinary team that have done just a great job managing this program.

    I want to begin by recalling where we were one year ago. Millions of jobs had already been lost to the recession before I was sworn into office. Another 800,000 would be lost in the month of January. We’d later learn that our economy had shrunk by an astounding 6.4 percent in the first quarter of 2009. And economists from across the political spectrum warned that if dramatic action was not taken to break the back of the recession, the United States could spiral into another depression.

    That was the backdrop against which I signed the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act in Denver with Blake alongside. It certainly wasn’t a politically easy decision to make for me or for the members of Congress who supported it — because, let’s face it, no large expenditure is ever that popular, particularly at a time when we’re also facing a massive deficit. But we acted because failure to do so would have led to catastrophe. We acted because we had a larger responsibility than simply winning the next election. We had a responsibility to do what was right for the U.S. economy and for the American people.

    One year later, it is largely thanks to the Recovery Act that a second depression is no longer a possibility. It’s one of the main reasons the economy has gone from shrinking by 6 percent to growing at about 6 percent. And this morning we learned that manufacturing production posted a strong gain. So far, the Recovery Act is responsible for the jobs of about 2 million Americans who would otherwise be unemployed. These aren’t just our numbers; these are the estimates of independent, nonpartisan economists across the spectrum.

    Now, despite all this, the bill still generates some controversy. And part of that is because there are those, let’s face it, across the aisle who have tried to score political points by attacking what we did, even as many of them show up at ribbon-cutting ceremonies for projects in their districts. (Laughter and applause.) But if we’re honest, part of the controversy also is, is that despite the extraordinary work that has been done through the Recovery Act, millions of Americans are still without jobs. Millions more are struggling to make ends meet. So it doesn’t yet feel like much of a recovery. And I understand that. It’s why we’re going to continue to do everything in our power to turn this economy around.

    Now the truth is the Recovery Act was never intended to save every job or restore our economy to full strength. No bill or government program can do that. Businesses are the true engines of growth; businesses are the engines of job creation in this country. They always will be. But during a recession, when businesses pull back and people stop spending, what government can do is provide a temporary boost that puts money in people’s pockets, and keeps workers on the job, cuts taxes for small businesses, generates more demand; gives confidence to entrepreneurs that maybe they don’t have to cut back right now, maybe they can hold steady in their plans and in their dreams. That’s exactly what we’ve been able to do with the Recovery Act.

    And I just want to point this out — there has never been a program of this scale, moved at this speed, that has been enacted as effectively and as transparently as the Recovery Act. I’m grateful that Congress agreed to my request that the bill include no earmarks, that all projects receive funding based solely on their merits. And despite that, I was still concerned — Joe and I were just talking in the back — when this thing passed we said $787 billion — somewhere there’s going to be some story of some money that ended up being misspent; $787 billion spent out over 18 months, that’s a lot — that’s a lot of money. And it is a testimony to Vice President Biden and his team that, as Joe puts it, the dog, so far at least, hasn’t barked. (Laughter.)

    This team has done an outstanding job overseeing the Recovery Act. It doesn’t mean that everything has been perfect, but when you think about the scope, the magnitude of this thing, this program has run cleanly, smoothly, transparently. We brought in one of the toughest inspector generals in Washington as well as professionals from private industry to help run the implementation. And every American can see how and where this money has been spent just by going on www.recovery.gov.

    Now, just to review: One-third of the money in this bill — one-third — was made up of tax cuts. I talked about this at the State of the Union. Tax cuts for 95 percent of working Americans. I just want to say to the American people, because we see some polling where about twice as many people think we’ve raised taxes as lowered taxes — 95 percent of you got a tax cut. (Applause.) Tax cuts for 95 percent of working Americans. Tax cuts for small businesses. Tax cuts for first-time homebuyers. Tax cuts for parents trying to — trying to care for their kids. Tax cuts for 8 million Americans paying for college. So far, we’ve provided $120 billion in tax relief to families and small businesses.

    Now, up until this point I’ve never met a Republican who didn’t like a good tax cut — (laughter) — but you remember when I mentioned this at the State of the Union, Joe, they were all kind of squirming in their seats. They weren’t sure whether to clap or — (laughter) — or not because most of them had voted against all these tax cuts, which I thought was — it was interesting to watch. (Laughter.)

    The second third of this bill was made up of relief for those who have been most affected by this recession. We’ve extended or increased unemployment benefits for more than 19 million Americans. We made health insurance 65 percent cheaper for families who lost their jobs and had to get temporary coverage through COBRA. And we gave relief to states that were struggling to balance their budgets — relief that has allowed 300,000 teachers and education workers to keep their jobs, as well as tens of thousands of cops and firefighters and first responders and correctional officers. And Joe Biden will tell you that not one of the 50 governors we’ve spoken to — Democrat or Republican — has failed to show appreciation for this relief.

    And I also have to tell you that I am concerned because state budgets have not yet recovered, and you’re now seeing a whole bunch of state and local governments who were able to put off layoffs last year, as the recovery money is running out, having to make some very tough decisions. And we could potentially see layoffs taking place this year because we haven’t re-upped in terms of providing some help to those states and local governments. That’s something that we’re watching and we’re concerned about.

    Now, the last third of the Recovery Act is what I want to talk a little bit about more today. It’s the reason Blake and Doug are here. That third is about rebuilding our economy on a new and stronger foundation for growth over the long term. See, we knew when we came into office that it wasn’t enough simply to solve the immediate crisis before us. We knew that even before the crisis hit, we had come through what some people are calling the “lost decade” — a period where there was barely any job growth, and where the income of the average American household declined. This is before the recession, over the course of the decade, the average American household, they saw their incomes decline even as the cost of health care and college tuition were skyrocketing, had reached record highs. The prosperity was built on little more than a housing bubble and on financial speculation — people maxing out on their credit cards, taking out home equity loans.

    We can’t go back to that kind of economy. That’s not where the jobs are. The jobs of the 21st century are in areas like clean energy and technology, advanced manufacturing, new infrastructure. That kind of economy requires us to consume less and produce more; to import less and export more. Instead of sending jobs overseas, we need to send more products overseas that are made by American workers and American business. And we need to train our workers for those jobs with new skills and a world-class education.

    Other countries already realize this. They’re putting more emphasis on math and science. They’re building high-speed railroads and expanding broadband. They’re making serious investments in clean energy because they want those jobs.

    And America cannot stand still in the face of this challenge. We can’t afford to put our future on hold. So that’s why a big part of the Recovery Act has been about investing in that future. Yes, it created jobs now. Yes, it created business opportunities now. But more importantly, it’s laying the foundation for where we need to go.

    So instead of just pouring more money into America’s schools, regardless of their performance, we launched a national competition between states that only rewards success and reform — reform that raises student achievement, and inspires students to excel in math and science, and turns around failing schools — failing schools that steal the future of too many young Americans.

    We’re also making sure that our nation has an infrastructure that’s built to compete in the 21st century. So we now have projects in 31 states that are laying the ground for the first high-speed rail network in the United States of America. I mean, for years, Japan and Europe have had high-speed rail. China has got about 40 times as many projects that have been going on, on this front. We’re playing catch-up; we shouldn’t be.

    The Recovery Act has made possible over 12,500 transportation construction projects, from rebuilding highways to improving our airports. And today we announced funding for over 50 innovative transportation projects across America — everything from railroads in Appalachia to a new passenger terminal in New Orleans.

    These projects will put hundreds of thousands of Americans to work. And in many cases, they already have. That’s part of the reason that Chuck is here today — he’s the president of a construction company in Pennsylvania, and the Recovery Act will fund about a third of the work his paving company will do this year. That’s allowed him to hire two engineers and about a hundred employees. So in case people are wondering whether or not the Recovery Act has created jobs and opportunity for businesses, talk to Chuck. (Laughter.) The new equipment he’s ordered to help pave these roads will save an additional 40 jobs on an assembly line out in California. These are well-paying, long-lasting, private sector jobs that wouldn’t be possible without the Recovery Act. They’ll be doing the work that America needs done to stay competitive in a global economy.

    In no area is this more important than in energy. Because of the Recovery Act, we have finally jumpstarted the clean energy industry in America, and made possible 200,000 jobs in the clean energy and construction sectors.

    Just take one example: Consider the investment that we’ve made in the kind of batteries used in hybrid and electric cars. You’ve heard about these, right? Before the Recovery Act was signed, 98 percent of the world’s advanced battery production was done in Asian countries. The United States did less than 2 percent of this advanced battery manufacturing that’s going to be the key to these high-mileage, low-emission cars.

    Then we invested in new research and battery technologies, and supported the construction of 20 battery factories that will employ tens of thousands of Americans — batteries that can make enough — factories that can make enough batteries each year to power half a million plug-in hybrid vehicles. So as a result, next year — next year, two years after the Recovery Act — the United States will have the capacity to produce nearly 20 percent of the world’s advanced batteries — from less than 2 percent to 20 percent. And we’ll be able to make 40 percent of these advanced batteries by 2015 — an entire new industry because of the Recovery Act.

    This kind of progress is happening throughout our clean energy sector. Yesterday I announced loan guarantees to break ground on America’s first new nuclear power plant in nearly three decades — a plant that will create thousands of construction jobs and 800 permanent jobs in years to come. There’s the manufacturer in Philadelphia who makes energy-efficient windows. He used to be skeptical about the Recovery Act until he had to add two more shifts just to keep up with the new business it’s created.

    And Blake at Namaste Solar — it’s based in Boulder, Colorado. One year ago, Blake gave us a tour of one of his company’s solar installations, on top of a museum in Denver, right before I signed the Recovery Act into law. And at the time, Blake was pretty sure that the recession would force him to lay off about half of his staff. One year later, because of the clean energy investments in the Recovery Act, he has instead added about a dozen new workers, and expects to hire about a dozen more by year’s end. His company continues to install solar panels all over Colorado, from the Governor’s Mansion to the Denver Museum of Natural — Nature and Science.

    So that’s our future. That’s what’s possible in America. You can argue, rightly, that we haven’t made as much progress as we need to make when it comes to spurring job creation. That’s part of the reason why the Recovery Act is on track to save or create another 1.5 million jobs in 2010. That’s part of the reason why I expect Congress to pass additional measures as quickly as possible that will help our small business owners create new jobs; give them more of an incentive to hire.

    But for those skeptics who refuse to believe the Recovery Act has done any good, who continue to insist that the bill didn’t work, I’d ask you to take that argument up with Blake and his employees. Take that argument up with Chuck and his construction workers. Take it up with the Americans who are working in those battery plants, or building those new highways, or teaching our children new skills — all because the Recovery Act made it possible.

    So our work is far from over, but we have rescued this economy from the worst of this crisis. And slowly, in new factories and research facilities and small businesses, the American people are rebuilding a better future. And we will continue to support their efforts. We will leave our children an economy that is stronger and more prosperous than it was before.

    Thank you very much, everybody. (Applause.)

    END 10:50 A.M. EST

    =========================================================
    THE WHITE HOUSE
    Office of the Press Secretary
    _______________________________________________________________________________________
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    February 17, 2010

    RECOVERY BY THE NUMBERS
    The Recovery Act at One Year

    One year in, the Recovery Act is at work across the country creating jobs and driving economic growth. From major highway projects to green retrofits of military facilities and manufacturing of advanced batteries, more than 55,000 projects across the country have now been funded through the Recovery Act. To get an up close look at some of those projects, click HERE. This is in addition to the nearly $120 billion in tax relief already provided to American families and businesses – with more to come this year – and the billions of dollars in relief provided to shore up state and local government programs like Medicaid and education facing severe budget shortfalls. To see a video of how the Recovery Act is helping cities across the country click HERE.

    This is what it looks like, by the numbers:

    Jobs

    · CBO: According to the nonpartisan CBO, the Recovery Act is already responsible for as many as 2.4 million jobs through the end of 2009.

    · CEA, Other Private Forecasters: Analysis by the Council of Economic Advisers also found that the Recovery Act is responsible for about 2 million jobs – a figure in line with estimates from private forecasters like IHS Global, Moody’s Economy and even the conservative American Enterprise Institute.

    The Economy

    · GDP/Economic Growth: In the fourth quarter of 2009, the economy grew 5.7 percent – – the largest gain in six years and something many economists say is largely due to the Recovery Act. Before the Recovery Act, the economy was shrinking by about 6 percent.

    · Job Losses: Job losses for the fourth quarter of 2009 were one-seventh what they were in the first quarter of 2009 when the Recovery Act was passed.

    Recovery Dollars

    Spending: Nearly 70 percent of the $499 billion in Recovery Act spending has been obligated to specific programs and projects so far, putting those dollars to work in communities across the country.

    Tax Relief: Nearly $120 billion in tax relief has been provided for working families and businesses through the Recovery Act this year.

    Infrastructure

    · Transportation Construction: Over 12,500 transportation construction projects – ranging from highway construction to airport improvement projects – have been funded so far. Of those, more than 8,500 are already underway across the country – with even more breaking ground as the weather warms up.

    · Defense Construction: Over 2,850 DOD construction and rehabilitation projects have been started at over 350 military facilities nationwide.

    · Superfund Sites: 51 Superfund project sites from the National Priority List have been funded. Of those sites, 34 already have on-site construction.

    · National Parks: Over 300 improvement projects underway or completed at 175 National Parks nationwide.

    · Community Health Centers: Over 1,100 health center grant recipients operate more than 7,500 community-based clinics nationwide have received nearly $1.9 billion in Health Resources and Services Administration Recovery Act awards to build or improve facilities and expand services.

    · Public Housing: Over 3,100 public housing authorities have been awarded Recovery Act funding totaling nearly $4 billion, helping to create jobs, retrofit housing, and support construction projects to improve public housing across the country.

    Build America Bonds: Over $70 billion in Build America Bonds have been issued in 47 states since April 2009 to fund a wide array of critical infrastructure projects, many of which may have been stalled or unfunded construction projects. Build America Bonds attract a wider array of investors and provide a more attractive financing option for States and localities, and they now represent about 19 percent of municipal bond debt issued since the popular program began.

    Technology/Innovation

    · Advanced Batteries and Electric Vehicles: $2.4 billion in grants have been awarded to companies and educational institutions in over 20 states to fund 48 new advanced battery and electric drive projects that will help power the next generation of advanced vehicles.

    · Smart Energy Grid: $3.4 billion in grants have been awarded to private companies, utilities, manufacturers and cities to fund smart energy grid projects that will support tens of thousands of jobs and benefit consumers in 49 states.

    · Energy-Efficient Vehicles: $300 million in grants have been awarded to 25 cost-share projects under DOE’s Clean Cities program to expand the nation’s fleet of alternative fuel vehicles by putting more than 9,000 alternative fuel and energy efficient vehicles on the road.

    · Health Research: More than $5 billion in awards have been made through 12,000 grants to research and educational institutions to fund cutting edge medical research in every state.

    · Broadband: The first of over $7 billion in awards to bring broadband to communities where there is little or no access have been made – a significant step forward in driving local economic development.

    · High Speed Rail: Projects in 31 states to help lay a foundation for a high speed rail network here in the U.S. – including down-payments on 13 new, large-scale high-speed rail corridors across the country. This $8 billion investment will not only create jobs and drive economic growth, but jump-start a critical element of 21st century infrastructure.

    · Health IT: Over $750 million in awards have been made to state and local governments and community organizations to help prepare for widespread, meaningful use of health information technology. The awards will help make health IT available to over 100,000 hospitals and primary care physicians by 2014 and grow an emerging industry expected to support tens of thousands of jobs.

    Immediate Relief

    · Middle Class Tax Cut: Over 110 million working families have received a boost in their paycheck thanks to the Making Work Pay tax credit. Through this program, 95 percent of American families received an immediate infusion of cash that totaled $37 billion in tax relief in 2009.

    · Emergency Relief Checks: Nearly 55 million seniors, veterans and other high-need residents across the country have received one-time economic relief payments of $250, totaling $13.7 billion in relief.

    · Unemployment Benefits: More than 18 million Americans have received unemployment benefits through the Recovery Act.

    · Small Business Loans: SBA has supported nearly $20 billion in ARRA-funded loans to over 42,000 small businesses since the Recovery Act was signed into law.

    Aid to State and Local Governments

    · Medicaid: The Recovery Act has already made more than $56 billion available to states to help prevent cuts to Medicaid programs across the country.

    Education: More than $60 billion of Recovery Act funding has been awarded to help support education budgets – a move that governors say funded over 300,000 education jobs in the fourth quarter of 2009.

    · Law Enforcement: Over 4,600 law enforcement officers from more than 1,000 communities nationwide received three years of salary and benefits through the COPS program.

    ###

  • Whither the Tea Party? RNC’s Michael Steele on Fox & Friends

    RNC chairman Michael Steele on Fox after meeting with Tea Party activists:

    MICHAEL STEELE TELLS FOX & FRIENDS: THERE “WAS NOT ANY TALK” ABOUT THE TEA PARTY “BECOMING OR CREATING A THIRD PARTY”
    In an interview earlier this morning on FOX News Channel’s FOX & Friends, RNC Chairman Michael Steele spoke with co host Steve Doocy about the Tea Party activists, GOP “mistakes,” and the future of the Republican Party. Steele said “there was not any talk about becoming or creating a third party,” when he met with Tea Party activists. In addition, he said he finds it “amusing,” that when he meets “with groups concerned about the economy and the direction of the party they’re called activists;” but, “when the President meets with those groups…they’re called Senate Democrats.”

    Interview excerpts below:
    ***MANDATORY CREDIT FOX NEWS CHANNEL’S FOX & FRIENDS***
    ON HIS MEETING WITH TEA PARTY ACTIVISTS:
    “I can say, without really stepping out of any bounds here, there was not any talk about becoming or creating a third party. This is the frustration of citizen activists with a party that many had aligned themselves with over the years.”

    “I think when it ended we covered a lot of good ground, common ground that we can stand on. And people were feeling a little bit better about the direction we need to go.”

    “I found it amusing, when I meet with groups concerned about the economy and the direction of the party they’re called activists. When the President meets with those groups that are concerned about the economy and the direction of the party, they’re called Senate Democrats. So, I feel I’m in a better position right now.”

    ON REPUBLICAN “SPENDING LIKE DRUNKEN SAILORS” DURING THE BUSH ADMINISTRATION:
    “Absolutely, you learn from your mistakes.”

    “A big part of this process…between those who have become disaffected with the leadership of the party in the past, is to acknowledge where we have gone wrong, where we have made the mistakes: in spending in growing the size of government, in stepping away from those very constitutional principles and values that have certainly defined this party and its agenda for over one hundred years.”

    ON WHETHER THE REPUBLICAN PARTY WILL BECOME MORE “CONSERVATIVE”:
    “The biggest challenge for the GOP is not becoming more conservative, we are the conservative party of the United States…that is who we are. Our biggest challenge is staying true to who we are; and, recognizing those conservative principles that defined us in terms of how we define the role of government in the lives of everyday people. When we stay true to those principles I think we’re on much sturdier ground.”

  • Obama, First Lady Michelle Ash Wednesday message

    THE WHITE HOUSE
    Office of the Press Secretary
    _______________________________________________________________________________________
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    February 17, 2010
    Statement by the President on Ash Wednesday

    Michelle and I join Christians here in America and around the world in observing Ash Wednesday. We mark this solemn day of repentance and promise, knowing that Lent is a time for millions to renew faith and also deepen a commitment to loving and serving one another.

    ###

  • Valerie Jarrett and the Dalai Lama’s Thursday White House visit: Dispatched to India to set up meeting

    WASHINGTON–The Dalai Lama meets with President Obama Thursday at the White House. His invitation came from White House Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrett, dispatched last September to Dharamsala, India to see the exiled Tibet leader.

    I wrote about Jarrett’s diplomatic debut in September.

    That visit laid the groundwork for the Thursday meeting, coming after Obama visited China in November. Jarrett and I talked about her quiet diplomacy last week; read my column about Jarrett and the Dalai Lama here.

    /

    Valerie Jarrett quietly jets to India to meet with the Dalai Lama on Tibet
    By Lynn Sweet
    on September 14, 2009 7:07 AM

    WASHINGTON–White House Senior Advisor Valerie Jarrettt, who seemed to vanish at the end of last week, was actually dispatched to India on a delicate diplomatic mission: President Obama’ tapped her to meet with the exiled Tibetan religious leader, the Dalai Lama.
    Jarrettt called on the leading figure for Tibet’s autonomy from China on Sunday and Monday, along with State Department Under Secretary Maria Otero, the Obama White House new Special Coordinator for Tibetan Issues.
    The Jarrett visit to Dharamsala, India, to meet with the Dalai Lama at his residence, comes in advance of Obama traveling to China in November. The Nobel Prize winning Dalaii Lama was in the U.S. in May and has a return trip scheduled for next month; Jarrett’s visit could serve to pave the way for a White House meeting with Obama.
    Jarrettt’s brief was to brief on the Obama administration’s approach on Tibet–a sensitive issue, given the importance of the bi-lateral U.S.-China relationship.

    The Obama pledge to the Tibetans means, according to the Dalai Lama’s office, “protecting their distinct religious, linguistic, and cultural heritage and securing respect for their human rights and civil liberties.”
    Jarrettt–according to the Dalai Lama’s office– reported that Obama “commends the Dalai Lama for being consistent in looking for a solution based on Tibetan autonomy within the People’s Republic of China.

    “His Holiness gave an overview of the situation of the Tibetans in exile. He informed Ms. Jarrett of the measures taken by the Tibetans in India to preserve and promote the distinct Tibetan culture and identity through the kind and generous assistance of people and government of India.

    More from the office of the Dalai Lama:
    “He also updated Ms. Jarrett on the status of the dialogue process with the Chinese leadership, including the presentation of a comprehensive Memorandum on Tibetan autonomy to the Chinese leadership during the eighth round of discussions in October-November 2008. Ms. Jarrett discussed with His Holiness on the best way the United States could assist in the resolution for the Tibetan issue, particularly in the light of the first visit by President Obama to China in November. His Holiness conveyed to Ms. Jarrett the issues that he would like President Obama to take when he visits China. His Holiness also conveyed his strong belief that the United States and China need to have very good and principled relations.

    His Holiness greatly appreciated President Obama’s concern for the situation in Tibet and said he was hopeful that during his presidency the Tibetan people can see progress in the resolution of their problem. His Holiness is looking forward to meeting President Obama after his visit to China.

    His Holiness expressed his concerns on a number of issues, including global conflicts and matters relating to the environment. He applauded President Obama’s initiative to tackle these issues through cooperation, outreach and dialogue and urged him to continue doing so.

  • Van Hollen, in Chicago for Foster, Seals, Halverson fund-raisers. Wasserman Schultz on March 9

    UPDATED

    WASHINGTON–Rep. Bill Foster (D-Ill.) Rep. Debbie Halverson (D-Ill.) and Democratic House hopeful Dan Seals, running for the open seat in the 10th congressional district, are getting a fund-raising boost Friday with Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee chief Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) in Chicago headlining separate events for them.

    The DCCC is hoping for a payback on March 9 at a mega dollar fund-raiser in Chicago where the draw are the DCCC vice chairs, Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fl.) and Rep. Bruce Braley (D-Ia.)

    The host for the DCCC funder is attorney Phil “Flip” Corboy and the lunch is at the Corby & Demetrio Loop offices. The prices: to be in the “Speakers Cabinet” is $30,400 per couple; Host, $10,000 per couple; Sponsor, $2,500 per couple; single ticket, $500.

    The Foster breakfast is hosted by Jack Levin, Lew and Susan Manilow, Michael Bauer, Antonio Romanucci and Sheila Smith at the Kirkland & Ellis offices in the Loop. Sliding scale, from $1,000 to $250.

    The Friday afternoon Seals event is billed as a “meeting” to “hear about the 10th Congressional race” over at the Standard Club, also in the Loop. Sliding scale, from $2,400 to $500. Van Hollen has a second Seals event at 6 p.m. in Winnetka hosted by
    Mary Stowell & Jim Streicker.

    Van Hollen has a lunch funder for Halverson at Powers Rogers and Smith, PC in the Loop

  • President Obama official schedule and guidance, Feb. 17, 2010. Meets with war cabinet, Spanish King Juan Carlos I

    THE WHITE HOUSE
    Office of the Press Secretary
    _______________________________________________________________________________________
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    February 16, 2010

    DAILY GUIDANCE AND PRESS SCHEDULE FOR
    WEDNESDAY, FEBRUARY 17, 2010

    In the morning, the President and the Vice President will receive the Presidential Daily Briefing and the Economic Daily Briefing in the Oval Office. These briefings are closed press.

    Later, the President will deliver remarks on the economy on the one year anniversary of the signing of the Recovery Act in the South Court Auditorium. The Vice President will introduce the President. This event is pooled press.

    The President will then meet with his national security team on Afghanistan and Pakistan in the Situation Room. This meeting is closed press. Expected attendees include:
    The Vice President
    Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
    Secretary of Defense Robert Gates
    Ambassador Susan Rice, Permanent U.S. Representative to the United Nations
    Deputy Secretary of State James Steinberg
    Ambassador Richard Holbrooke, U.S. Special Representative for Afghanistan and Pakistan (via videoconference)
    Karl Eikenberry, U.S. Ambassador to Afghanistan (via videoconference)
    Anne Patterson, U.S. Ambassador to Pakistan (via videoconference)
    Under Secretary of Defense Michele Flournoy
    Admiral Michael Mullen, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff
    General James E. Cartwright, USMC, Vice Chairman, Joint Chiefs of Staff
    General David Petraeus, U.S. Central Command
    General Stanley McChrystal, U.S. Commander in Afghanistan (via videoconference)
    Lieutenant General Dave Rodriguez (via videoconference)
    Lietenant General William Caldwell (via videoconference)
    Vice Admiral Michael LaFever (via videoconference)
    Admiral Dennis Blair, Director of National Intelligence
    CIA Director Leon Panetta
    Deputy Secretary of Treasury Neal Wolin
    General James Jones, National Security Advisor
    Tom Donilon, Deputy National Security Advisor
    John Brennan, Assistant to the President for Counterterrorism and Homeland Security
    Lieutenant General Douglas Lute, Special Assistant to the President for Afghanistan and Pakistan
    Robert Nabors, OMB Deputy Director

    In the afternoon, the President and the Vice President will meet with Secretary of State Clinton in the Oval Office. This meeting is closed press. The President will then have lunch with King Juan Carlos I of Spain in the Private Dining Room. This lunch is closed press.

    Later, the President and the Vice President will meet with General Raymond Odierno, Commanding General, Multi-National Force – Iraq, and US Ambassador to Iraq Chris Hill in the Oval Office. The President will then meet with senior advisors in the Oval Office. These meetings are closed press.

    In the evening, the President will be joined by Congressional leaders and middle school students from Michigan, Florida, and Nebraska in the Roosevelt Room to congratulate the astronauts on the International Space Station and the Space Shuttle Endeavour on their successful ongoing mission. There will be a pool spray during the call.

    In-Town Travel Pool
    Wires: AP, Reuters, Bloomberg
    Wire Photos: AP, Reuters, AFP
    TV Corr & Crew: CNN
    Print: Boston Globe
    Radio: ABC
    Travel Photo: TIME

    EST

    9:00AM Pool Call Time

    9:15AM THE PRESIDENT and THE VICE PRESIDENT receive the Presidential Daily Briefing
    Oval Office
    Closed Press

    9:45AM THE PRESIDENT and THE VICE PRESIDENT receive the Economic Daily Briefing
    Oval Office
    Closed Press

    10:25AM THE PRESIDENT delivers remarks on the economy on the one year anniversary of the signing of the Recovery Act
    South Court Auditorium
    Pooled Press (Pre-set 9:25AM – Final Gather 10:00AM – Stakeout Location)

    11:00AM THE PRESIDENT meets with his national security team on Afghanistan
    Situation Room
    Closed Press

    12:05PM THE PRESIDENT and THE VICE PRESIDENT meet with Secretary of State Clinton
    Oval Office
    Closed Press

    12:50PM THE PRESIDENT and King Juan Carlos I of Spain have lunch
    Private Dining Room
    Closed Press

    2:30PM THE PRESIDENT and THE VIDE PRESIDENT meet with General Odierno and Ambassador Hill
    Oval Office
    Closed Press

    3:15PM THE PRESIDENT meets with senior advisors
    Oval Office
    Closed Press

    5:15PM THE PRESIDENT makes call to NASA astronauts
    Roosevelt Room
    Pool spray (Gather time 5:10PM – Briefing Room)

    Briefing Schedule

    1:30PM Briefing by Press Secretary Robert Gibbs

    ##

  • Obama names ambassador to Syria; first in five years

    THE WHITE HOUSE
    Office of the Press Secretary
    _______________________________________________________________________________________
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    February 16, 2010

    Statement by the Press Secretary on Naming Robert Ford as U.S. Ambassador to Damascus

    “Ambassador Ford is a highly accomplished diplomat with many years of experience in the Middle East. His appointment represents President Obama’s commitment to use engagement to advance U.S. interests by improving communication with the Syrian government and people. If confirmed by the Senate, Ambassador Ford will engage the Syrian government on how we can enhance relations, while addressing areas of ongoing concern.”

    =============================
    THE WHITE HOUSE

    Office of the Press Secretary

    _______________________________________________________________________________________

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

    February 16, 2010

    President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts

    WASHINGTON – Today, President Barack Obama announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to key administration posts:

    · Robert Stephen Ford, Ambassador to the Syrian Arab Republic, Department of State

    · Jonathan Andrew Hatfield, Inspector General, Corporation for National and Community Service

    President Obama said, “Our nation will be well-served by these fine public servants, who both bring a depth of experience and tremendous dedication to their fields. I look forward to working with them in the months and years ahead.”

    President Obama announced today his intent to nominate the following individuals:

    Robert Stephen Ford, Nominee for Ambassador to the Syrian Arab Republic, Department of State

    Robert Stephen Ford is presently Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy Baghdad, Iraq. Mr. Ford is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service. He was confirmed by the U.S. Senate as Ambassador to Algeria on May 27, 2006, and sworn in on August 11, 2006. Mr. Ford served from 2004 until 2006 and again from 2008 until 2009 as the Political Counselor to the U.S. Embassy Baghdad, Iraq and was Deputy Chief of Mission in Bahrain from 2001 until 2004. Mr. Ford has also served in a number of other posts since entering the Foreign Service in 1985, including Izmir, Cairo, Algiers, and Yaoundé. Mr. Ford earned a Master of Arts in 1983 from Johns Hopkins University. He is a recipient of a number of Department of State awards, including the 2005 James Clement Dunn Award for outstanding work at the mid-level in the Foreign Service as well as three Superior Honor Awards and two Meritorious Honor awards. Mr. Ford speaks German, Turkish, French, and Arabic.

    Jonathan Andrew Hatfield, Nominee for Inspector General, Corporation for National and Community Service

    Jonathan Andrew Hatfield has served as the Deputy Inspector General of the Federal Election Commission since 2005. He has been with the Federal Election Commission Office of Inspector General since 1994 and has held several executive, managerial, and staff positions. As the Deputy Inspector General, Mr. Hatfield is responsible for assisting the Inspector General coordinate and supervise audits, investigations, and inspections at the Commission. He is also responsible for policy setting and strategic planning that integrates key audit and investigative goals and priorities to provide effective oversight of the Commission. Mr. Hatfield has received several awards during his professional career for outstanding accomplishments; most notably, the Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency recognized Mr. Hatfield for his audit, investigative, and individual accomplishments. In 2009, he was granted a graduate certificate by American University for completion of the University’s Key Executive Leadership Certificate Program for Inspector General Leaders. Mr. Hatfield holds a B.B.A. in Accounting from Radford University and is a Certified Public Accountant in the state of Virginia.

    ##

  • Obama wants to invest in nuclear energy. Transcript.

    THE WHITE HOUSE

    Office of the Press Secretary

    _________________________________________________________________________________________________

    For Immediate Release February 16, 2010

    REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT

    ON ENERGY

    IBEW Local 26

    Lanham, Maryland

    11:05 A.M. EST

    THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, everybody. Thank you. Please have a seat. Have a seat. Good morning, everybody. Before I begin let me just acknowledge some of the people who are standing behind me here: First of all, two people who have been working really hard to make this day happen — Secretary Steven Chu, my Energy Secretary — Steven Chu. (Applause.) And my White House advisor on everything having to do with energy, Carol Browner. (Applause.)

    I want to acknowledge the outstanding governor of Maryland, Martin O’Malley, as well as his lieutenant governor, Anthony Brown. (Applause.) We’ve got Mark Ayers from the building trades, and Billy Hite from the UA Plumbers and Pipefitters — give them a big round of applause. (Applause.) Gregory Jaczko, who’s with the Nuclear Energy Commission, is here. Where is he? (Applause.) Ed Hill, president of IBEW International. (Applause.) And I want to thank Chuck Graham and everybody here at Local 26 for their great hospitality. (Applause.)

    Thank you for the warm welcome. Thanks for showing me around. I was just mentioning that I got a chance to pull the first fire alarm since I was in junior high. (Laughter.) And I didn’t get in trouble for it.

    This is an extraordinarily impressive facility, where workers are instructed on everything from the installation of sophisticated energy hardware and software to the basics of current and resistance. We need to look no further than the workers and apprentices who are standing behind me to see the future that’s possible when it comes to clean energy.

    It’s a future in which skilled laborers are helping us lead in burgeoning industries. It’s a future in which renewable electricity is fueling plug-in hybrid cars and energy-efficient homes and businesses. It’s a future in which we’re exporting homegrown energy technology instead of importing foreign oil. And it’s a future in which our economy is powered not by what we borrow and spend but what we invent and what we build.

    That’s the bright future that lies ahead for America. And it’s one of — it’s a future that my administration is striving to achieve each and every day. We’ve already made the largest investment in clean energy in history as part of the Recovery Act — an investment that is expected to create more than 700,000 jobs across America — manufacturing advanced batteries for more fuel-efficient vehicles, upgrading the power grid so that it’s smarter and it’s stronger, doubling our nation’s capacity to generate renewable energy. And after decades in which we have done little to increase the efficiency of cars and trucks, we’ve raised fuel economy standards to reduce our dependence on foreign oil while helping folks save money at the pump.

    But in order to truly harness our potential in clean energy we’re going to have to do more, and that’s why we’re here. In the near term, as we transition to cleaner energy sources, we’re going to have to make some tough decisions about opening up new offshore areas for oil and gas development. We’ll need to make continued investments in advanced biofuels and clean coal technologies, even as we build greater capacity in renewables like wind and solar. And we’re going to have to build a new generation of safe, clean nuclear power plants in America.

    That’s what brings us here. Through the Department of Energy — under the leadership of Nobel prize-winning physicist, Steven Chu — although, just a quick side note: When he was talking to some of the instructors here, and they were talking about currents and this and that and the other, I indicated to him that he could have saved a lot of money. Instead of getting a Ph.D., he could have come here and learned some of the same stuff. (Laughter and applause.) You know, the instructors here were just keeping up — they were right there with him.

    But through the Department of Energy and Secretary Chu’s leadership, we are announcing roughly $8 billion in loan guarantees to break ground on the first new nuclear plant in our country in three decades — the first new nuclear power plant in nearly three decades. (Applause.)

    It’s a plant that will create thousands of construction jobs in the next few years, and some 800 permanent jobs — well-paying permanent jobs — in the years to come. And this is only the beginning. My budget proposes tripling the loan guarantees we provide to help finance safe, clean nuclear facilities — and we’ll continue to provide financing for clean energy projects here in Maryland and across America.

    Now, there will be those that welcome this announcement, those who think it’s been long overdue. But there are also going to be those who strongly disagree with this announcement. The same has been true in other areas of our energy debate, from offshore drilling to putting a price on carbon pollution. But what I want to emphasize is this: Even when we have differences, we cannot allow those differences to prevent us from making progress. On an issue that affects our economy, our security, and the future of our planet, we can’t keep on being mired in the same old stale debates between the left and the right, between environmentalists and entrepreneurs.

    See, our competitors are racing to create jobs and command growing energy industries. And nuclear energy is no exception. Japan and France have long invested heavily in this industry. Meanwhile, there are 56 nuclear reactors under construction around the world: 21 in China alone; six in South Korea; five in India. And the commitment of these countries is not just generating the jobs in those plants; it’s generating demand for expertise and new technologies.

    So make no mistake: Whether it’s nuclear energy, or solar or wind energy, if we fail to invest in the technologies of tomorrow, then we’re going to be importing those technologies instead of exporting them. We will fall behind. Jobs will be produced overseas, instead of here in the United States of America. And that’s not a future that I accept.

    Now, I know it’s been long assumed that those who champion the environment are opposed to nuclear power. But the fact is, even though we’ve not broken ground on a new power plant — new nuclear plant in 30 years, nuclear energy remains our largest source of fuel that produces no carbon emissions. To meet our growing energy needs and prevent the worst consequences of climate change, we’ll need to increase our supply of nuclear power. It’s that simple. This one plant, for example, will cut carbon pollution by 16 million tons each year when compared to a similar coal plant. That’s like taking 3.5 million cars off the road.

    On the other side, there are those who have long advocated for nuclear power — including many Republicans — who have to recognize that we’re not going to achieve a big boost in nuclear capacity unless we also create a system of incentives to make clean energy profitable. That’s not just my personal conclusion; it’s the conclusion of many in the energy industry itself, including CEOs of the nation’s largest utility companies. Energy leaders and experts recognize that as long as producing carbon pollution carries no cost, traditional plants that use fossil fuels will be more cost-effective than plants that use nuclear fuel.

    That’s why we need comprehensive energy and climate legislation, and why this legislation has drawn support from across the ideological spectrum. I raised this just last week with congressional Republican leaders. I believe there’s real common ground here. And my administration will be working to build on areas of agreement so that we can pass a bipartisan energy and climate bill through the Senate.

    Now, none of this is to say that there aren’t some serious drawbacks with respect to nuclear energy that have to be addressed. As the CEOs standing behind me will tell you, nuclear power generates waste, and we need to accelerate our efforts to find ways of storing this waste safely and disposing of it. That’s why we’ve asked a bipartisan group of leaders and nuclear experts to examine this challenge. And these plants also have to be held to the highest and strictest safety standards to answer the legitimate concerns of Americans who live near and far from these facilities. That’s going to be an imperative.

    But investing in nuclear energy remains a necessary step. What I hope is that with this announcement, we’re underscoring both our seriousness in meeting the energy challenge and our willingness to look at this challenge not as a partisan issue but as a matter that’s far more important than politics — because the choices we make will affect not just the next generation but many generations to come.

    The fact is changing the ways we produce and use energy requires us to think anew; it requires us to act anew; and it demands of us a willingness to extend our hand across some of the old divides, to act in good faith, and to move beyond the broken politics of the past. That’s what we must do; that’s what we will do.

    Thank you very much, everybody. Appreciate it. (Applause.)

    END 11:15 A.M. EST

  • White House Easter Egg Roll April 5, 2010. Online lottery for tickets

    The 2010 White House Easter Egg Roll is April 5. Click here for the link to general information about the Easter Egg Roll. Click here for the link to the lottery page.

    There is a deadline for applying for tickets:
    Entries for the 2010 White House Easter Egg Roll Online Lottery will be accepted from Thursday, February 25 at 12:01AM (EST) through Sunday, February 28 at 11:59PM (EST)

    Below, release from the White House…..

    White House Announces 2010 White House Easter Egg Roll Date and Theme

    The President and First Lady announced today that this year’s White House Easter Egg Roll will be held on Monday, April 5, 2010 with the theme of “Ready, Set, Go!” promoting health and wellness. The event will feature live music, sports courts, cooking stations, storytelling and, of course, Easter egg rolling. All of the activities will encourage children to lead healthy and active lives and follow the First Lady’s ‘Let’s Move!’ initiative, a national campaign to combat childhood obesity. The White House will open its South Lawn for children aged 12 years and younger and their families.

    White House Easter Egg Roll tickets will be distributed through an online lottery system, allowing guests from across the United States to participate in a tradition that dates back to 1878. The lottery will open for entries on February 25th and close on February 28th. Full ticketing details can be found at www.whitehouse.gov/eastereggroll,

    For the most up-to-date information on the Easter Egg Roll and other public events at the White House, please visit www.whitehouse.gov/eastereggroll or call the Visitors Office 24-hour information line at (202) 456-7041. Media details will be released in the coming weeks.

    ###

  • Valentine’s weekend marks one year since Obama family visited Chicago home

    WASHINGTON–This past Valentine’s Day weekend marks one year since the entire Obama family visited their home on Greenwood in Chicago.

    The last time the First Family was home was Valentine’s Day weekend, 2009. President Obama stopped by briefly after a speech last year. This 2010 weekend, First Lady Michelle Obama took Malia and Sasha to Camp David on Friday; Saturday they made a daytrip from Camp David to Pennsylvania to ski; on Sunday they were at Camp David and returned to Washington later in the day.

    I asked First Lady Michelle Obama why trips home never materialized during a January interview.

    Then President-elect Obama said in December, 2008 that he expected to get back home “as often as possible, My expectation would be that, depending on what my schedule looks like, you know, we’re going to try to get back here at least once every six weeks or couple of months.”

    Mrs. Obama explained in January, “Kids, because on Saturday there is ballet and Sasha did basketball last fall and there were games on Saturday, and then when basketball season was over, soccer season started for Malia, games were on Saturday, and then birthday parties and sleep overs and people visiting you. So, to find a weekend; ‘where, you know, you go to the kids and go, ‘you want to go to Chicago,” she said, just never happened.

    “…And before you know it its winter and ‘we’re not going now,” she said. “January’s out..”

    She explained more about not making it to Chicago. “Its really life and the fact that the kids have built a life here and that’s good and right now I want to encourage that life and not keep pulling them out. So its less our schedules than them. Who’s got kids? They dictate the weekend.”’

  • Obama’s Valentine’s Day, the Sun-Times, Washington Post and Google

    The First Couple spent Valentine’s Day 2009 in Chicago, dining at the Table Fifty-Two restaurant at 52 W. Elm St. On Sunday–Valentine’s Day 2010–First Lady Michelle Obama and daughters Malia and Sasha were at Camp David and President Obama joined them in the afternoon. That evening, the First Family returned to Washington.

    Clear enough? Not to the Washington Post. Here is the cautionary tale:

    At 10:14 p.m. on Feb. 14, 2009, I filed a post for my Chicago Sun-Times blog headlined “Obama’s Valentine’s Day dinner at Table Fifty-Two restaurant in Chicago.” That headline apparently had the right words in the right order for the automated Google search engine optimization system. So on Sunday–even Tuesday morning–if you typed in Obama and Valentine’s Day, even though it was a year later–my blog post from 2009 was at the very top.

    But that detail–the 2009 date–escaped the notice of a young Washington Post news aide who was writing the paper’s “Names and Faces” feature for the Monday Style section. The writer rewrote the post–with attribution to the Sun-Times–and ran it under the headline, “Obamas’ Valentine’s getaway” in Monday’s Washington Post.

    White House Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton early Monday tweeted, “WP rpt that the Obamas went to Chicago for Valentine’s Day is true – but probably worth noting that that was last year.”

    The Washingtonian Magazine’s Harry Jaffe opined in his blog, “We can rely on the Washington Post to keep track of the President and First Lady, at least in matters of their dating and dining. Right?

    “Wrong.”

    On Monday afternoon, Washington Post Ombudsman Andy Alexander posted a column on what happened, headlined, “Embarrassing error on Obamas’ Valentine’s dinner.”

    Here is a portion of Alexander’s unflinching assessment:

    The mistake was made by Tim Smith, a young news aide in the Style section, but also slipped past two levels of editing. It began when Smith was trolling the Internet Sunday for items to include in the “News & Faces” feature. Curious about how the president would spend the day, Smith went to Google News and typed “Obama” and “Valentine’s” in the search field. Up popped the Chicago Sun-Times story, dated Feb. 14, that began: “President Obama and First Lady Michelle are celebrating Valentines Day Saturday night in Chicago at the Table Fifty-Two restaurant at 52 W. Elm St. The co-owner and executive chef of the restaurant is Art Smith, the one time personal chef for Oprah Winfrey.”

    “Smith began fact-checking the item, scrutinizing the correct spelling of names and the location of a restaurant Art Smith also owns in the District. He went on the Website for Table Fifty-Two and planned to call after they opened at 4 p.m. Chicago time to check on what the Obamas had eaten the previous evening.



    “But in his research, Smith failed to note that the Sun-Times story had been written in 2009. The story ranked so high among stories yielded by his Google search that he just assumed it was timely. “It escaped me to even look at the date of the article,” he said Monday. Likewise, he said, “it slipped my mind to double check” with Table Fifty-Two later Sunday afternoon to see what the Obamas had eaten. And he apparently was not suspicious that Valentine’s Day was Sunday, not Saturday, as the Sun-Times story said.



    “After Smith wrote the item, it went through Scott Vogel, a style section editor, who said Monday that he did not independently check to confirm that the Obamas had dined at Table Fifty-two.

After Vogel, the item went through The Post’s copy desk before appearing in print and online.

Even though his editors didn’t catch the error, Smith took full blame. He noted that he did not confirm the dinner with the White House. Checking the White House pool reports for details would have revealed that the president on Sunday took a helicopter to Camp David to join his wife and daughters, who had gone there on Friday.”

  • Durbin visiting Congo, Ethiopia, Sudan

    Below, release from Durbin….

    DURBIN, BROWN TO TRAVEL TO AFRICA THIS WEEK

    [WASHINGTON, D.C.] – Assistant Senate Majority Leader Dick Durbin (D-IL) and Senator Sherrod Brown (D-OH) will travel to Tanzania, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, and Sudan this week to examine US foreign assistant programs in the region. Durbin and Brown’s trip will focus global health, maternal/infant mortality, clean water, sanitation, refugee, and economic development activities. The Senators will also discuss regional peacekeeping and diplomatic issues.

    Due to security concerns, the full itinerary will not be released in advance.

    Durbin and Brown departed Friday, traveling first to Tanzania where they plan meet with embassy officials, tour rural health clinics and hold meetings with Tanzanian health officials.

    The Senators will then travel to the Democratic Republic of Congo where they will discuss regional security issues with the UN peacekeeping force stationed in the eastern part of that country. They will also tour refugee camps and health facilities which house and treat victims of the region’s bloody civil war.

    In Ethiopia, Durbin and Brown will again focus on health issues – specifically HIV/AIDS treatment and prevention – with stops at rural and regional health facilities. They will also discuss regional security issues and humanitarian issues with stops at local refugee camps. Finally, the Senators will meet with Ethiopian Prime Minister Meles Zenawi.

    The final stop of the trip will be to Sudan where Durbin and Brown will discuss regional security concerns with the President of South Sudan, H.E. Lt. General Salva Kiir Mayardit. They will also discuss water and sanitation issues while touring refugee camps for those displaced by the conflict in the Darfur region of the country.

    The Senators will return to the United States on Friday the 19th.

    -30-