Author: Lynn Sweet

  • Axelrod denies Cornyn claim–with no evidence–of White House pressure on Giannoulias

    WASHINGTON — Admitting he had no evidence, Sen. John Cornyn, who runs the Senate GOP political operation, suggested Thursday that the White House may try to force Democratic U.S. Senate nominee Alexi Giannoulias out of the race — speculation that was flatly denied by White House Senior Advisor David Axelrod.

    When I asked Cornyn, a Texas Republican, why he thought the White House would do that, he said: “I don’t know. Giannoulias is a flawed candidate and they are realizing it and I think they are worried. . . . I hope they respect the choices of Democratic primary voters and don’t engage in some sort of back-room shenanigans.”

    A Giannoulias campaign spokeswoman said Cornyn’s comments were “ridiculous.”

    Cornyn’s comment came a day after President Obama, in Downstate Quincy, gave a shout-out to Giannoulias, calling him the “soon-to-be senator” in a remark I think was calculated to quiet talk about distancing himself from Giannoulias.

    “No one here is trying to ‘muscle’ him from the race. That should have been clear from the president’s comment yesterday,” White House senior adviser David Axelrod said Thursday. “Kind of ironic that on the day that Gov. [Charlie] Crist was forced out of the Florida Republican primary that Sen. Cornyn would be suggesting we would muscle someone out of a Senate race.”

    Crist, who is running for the U.S. Senate, announced Thursday he would drop out of the GOP primary and run as an independent.

    At a reporters breakfast sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor, Cornyn tried to inject an element of uncertainly about Giannoulias, who faces a tough race against GOP Senate nominee Rep. Mark Kirk for the seat Obama once held. Cornyn called the contest “one of our trophy races.”

    Giannoulias, the state treasurer, is in a rough patch because his family-owned Broadway Bank was seized last week. Giannoulias is a former bank officer.

    I asked Cornyn, chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, to assess Kirk and about what kind of resources the NRSC was going to pour into Illinois. Cornyn was in Chicago on April 6 for a fund-raiser to benefit the NRSC and Kirk.

    “We will do whatever it takes to help Cong. Kirk win that Senate seat. I am not prepared to quantify that yet,” Cornyn said. “The choice could not be more stark; Mark Kirk the reformer and Alexi Giannoulias… with all of his manifold problems that he has.”

    What Cornyn said next was surprising:

    “I just hope that the Democrats in Illinois respect the rights of Democrat primary voters to select their nominee and we don’t see some backroom shenanigans that this White House has been very active in, in trying to force him out of the race and disrespect the vote of the Democratic primary voters there,” Cornyn said.

    Alexi campaign spokesman Kathleen Strand said Cornyn’s comments were “Ridiculous. With all evidence to the contrary including the President’s supportive words just yesterday, it sounds like Senator Cornyn is as out of touch with what’s happening in Illinois as Congressman Mark Kirk is. Next thing you know, he will be agreeing with Mark Kirk that unemployment isn’t a big issue.”

    Hari Sevugan, Democratic National Committee National Press Secretary said, “Rather than spending his time on something he has no evidence of, we think Senator Cornyn should be more focused on the hard reality of his hand-picked Republican Senate candidates being chased out his party – from Florida to Kentucky to Utah – just because they are willing to work in a bipartisan manner or won’t sign on to the far right’s purity test.”

    Maybe Cornyn was just stirring the pot. Said Cornyn, “I feel very confident that Mark Kirk will be the next United States senator from Illinois.”

  • Gutierrez White House immigration protest; expects arrest

    WASHINGTON — In the wake of a new Arizona law aimed at illegal immigrants, Rep. Luis Gutierrez (D-Ill.) on Saturday is going to join demonstrators at the White House who will likely be arrested for their protests.

    He expects to be booked and released. Gutierrez will be a guest on “Face The Nation” on CBS this Sunday morning

    Gutierrez — arrested twice in 2001 protesting the Navy’s use of the Puerton Rican island of Vieques for bombing practice — will take part in civil disobedience “to keep the pressure up on President Obama and the leaders of the Democratic party,” said Gutierrez spokesman Doug Rivlin.

    Gutierrez has been outspoken in his criticism of the White House for not moving faster on a comprehensive immigration bill. “When you don’t keep the pressure on and you sort of lose hope that we are going to have a bill this year, things like Arizona happen, and you are reminded why we need to keep moving forward,” Rivlin said.

    Last Sunday, Gutierrez was in Phoenix at a rally objecting to the new law that would allow police, in certain circumstances, to ask people for papers showing they are in the U.S. legally.

  • President Obama official schedule and guidance, April 30, 2010. Secret Service training center

    THE WHITE HOUSE
    Office of the Press Secretary
    _______________________________________________________________________________________
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    April 29, 2010

    DAILY GUIDANCE AND PRESS SCHEDULE FOR
    FRIDAY, APRIL 30, 2010

    In the morning, the President will make a statement on the first quarter 2010 GDP numbers in the Rose Garden. He will be joined by representatives and workers from two U.S. manufacturers, Itron, a Washington state based manufacturer of smart energy meters, and A123 Systems, a Massachusetts based advanced battery manufacturer, that are expanding production and hiring as a result of Recovery Act investments in innovation and technology. This event is open press.

    In the afternoon, the President will travel to the James J. Rowley Training Center in Beltsville, Maryland. The President will tour the facility, observing the Secret Service’s training procedures and watching personnel taking part in some demonstration activities. He’ll also have the opportunity to thank some of the men and women who have worked so hard and made so many sacrifices to protect him and his family. The visit is closed press.

    In-Town Travel Pool
    Wires: AP, Reuters, Bloomberg
    Wire Photos: AP, Reuters, AFP
    TV Corr & Crew: NBC
    Print: BNA
    Radio: ABC

    EDT

    9:30AM Pool Call Time

    10:35AM THE PRESIDENT makes a statement on the first quarter 2010 GDP numbers
    Rose Garden
    Open Press (Pre-set 9:35AM – Final Gather 10:05AM – North Doors of the Palm Room)

    12:30PM THE PRESIDENT departs the White House en route Beltsville, Maryland
    South Lawn
    Open Press (Pre-set 12:00PM – Final Gather 12:15PM – North Doors of the Palm Room)

    12:45PM THE PRESIDENT arrives in Beltsville, Maryland and visits the James J. Rowley Training Center
    James J. Rowley Training Center, Beltsville, Maryland
    Closed Press (Travel Pool Gather Time 11:30AM – Stakeout Location)

    4:00PM THE PRESIDENT arrives at the White House
    South Lawn
    Open Press (Pre-set 3:30PM – Final Gather 3:45PM – North Doors of the Palm Room)

    ##

  • Obama remembers Dorothy Height at her funeral. Transcript

    THE WHITE HOUSE
    Office of the Press Secretary
    ___________________________________________________________
    For Immediate Release April 29, 2010

    REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
    AT FUNERAL SERVICE FOR DR. DOROTHY HEIGHT

    Washington National Cathedral
    Washington, D.C.

    10:40 A.M. EDT

    THE PRESIDENT: Please be seated. Let me begin by saying a word to Dr. Dorothy Height’s sister, Ms. Aldridge. To some, she was a mentor. To all, she was a friend. But to you, she was family, and my family offers yours our sympathy for your loss.

    We are gathered here today to celebrate the life, and mourn the passing, of Dr. Dorothy Height. It is fitting that we do so here, in our National Cathedral of Saint Peter and Saint Paul. Here, in a place of great honor. Here, in the House of God. Surrounded by the love of family and of friends. The love in this sanctuary is a testament to a life lived righteously; a life that lifted other lives; a life that changed this country for the better over the course of nearly one century here on Earth.

    Michelle and I didn’t know Dr. Height as well, or as long, as many of you. We were reminded during a previous moment in the service, when you have a nephew who’s 88 — (laughter) — you’ve lived a full life. (Applause.)

    But we did come to know her in the early days of my campaign. And we came to love her, as so many loved her. We came to love her stories. And we loved her smile. And we loved those hats — (laughter) — that she wore like a crown — regal. In the White House, she was a regular. She came by not once, not twice — 21 times she stopped by the White House. (Laughter and applause.) Took part in our discussions around health care reform in her final months.

    Last February, I was scheduled to see her and other civil rights leaders to discuss the pressing problems of unemployment — Reverend Sharpton, Ben Jealous of the NAACP, Marc Morial of the National Urban League. Then we discovered that Washington was about to be blanketed by the worst blizzard in record — two feet of snow.

    So I suggested to one of my aides, we should call Dr. Height and say we’re happy to reschedule the meeting. Certainly if the others come, she should not feel obliged. True to form, Dr. Height insisted on coming, despite the blizzard, never mind that she was in a wheelchair. She was not about to let just a bunch of men — (laughter) — in this meeting. (Applause.) It was only when the car literally could not get to her driveway that she reluctantly decided to stay home. But she still sent a message — (laughter) — about what needed to be done.

    And I tell that story partly because it brings a smile to my face, but also because it captures the quiet, dogged, dignified persistence that all of us who loved Dr. Height came to know so well — an attribute that we understand she learned early on.

    Born in the capital of the old Confederacy, brought north by her parents as part of that great migration, Dr. Height was raised in another age, in a different America, beyond the experience of many. It’s hard to imagine, I think, life in the first decades of that last century when the elderly woman that we knew was only a girl. Jim Crow ruled the South. The Klan was on the rise — a powerful political force. Lynching was all too often the penalty for the offense of black skin. Slaves had been freed within living memory, but too often, their children, their grandchildren remained captive, because they were denied justice and denied equality, denied opportunity, denied a chance to pursue their dreams.

    The progress that followed — progress that so many of you helped to achieve, progress that ultimately made it possible for Michelle and me to be here as President and First Lady — that progress came slowly. (Applause.)

    Progress came from the collective effort of multiple generations of Americans. From preachers and lawyers, and thinkers and doers, men and women like Dr. Height, who took it upon themselves — often at great risk — to change this country for the better. From men like W.E.B Du Bois and A. Philip Randolph; women like Mary McLeod Bethune and Betty Friedan — they’re Americans whose names we know. They are leaders whose legacies we teach. They are giants who fill our history books. Well, Dr. Dorothy Height deserves a place in this pantheon. She, too, deserves a place in our history books. (Applause.) She, too, deserves a place of honor in America’s memory.

    Look at her body of work. Desegregating the YWCA. Laying the groundwork for integration on Wednesdays in Mississippi. Lending pigs to poor farmers as a sustainable source of income. Strategizing with civil rights leaders, holding her own, the only woman in the room, Queen Esther to this Moses Generation — even as she led the National Council of Negro Women with vision and energy — (applause) — with vision and energy, vision and class.

    But we remember her not solely for all she did during the civil rights movement. We remember her for all she did over a lifetime, behind the scenes, to broaden the movement’s reach. To shine a light on stable families and tight-knit communities. To make us see the drive for civil rights and women’s rights not as a separate struggle, but as part of a larger movement to secure the rights of all humanity, regardless of gender, regardless of race, regardless of ethnicity.

    It’s an unambiguous record of righteous work, worthy of remembrance, worthy of recognition. And yet, one of the ironies is, is that year after year, decade in, decade out, Dr. Height went about her work quietly, without fanfare, without self-promotion. She never cared about who got the credit. She didn’t need to see her picture in the papers. She understood that the movement gathered strength from the bottom up, those unheralded men and women who don’t always make it into the history books but who steadily insisted on their dignity, on their manhood and womanhood. (Applause.) She wasn’t interested in credit. What she cared about was the cause. The cause of justice. The cause of equality. The cause of opportunity. Freedom’s cause.

    And that willingness to subsume herself, that humility and that grace, is why we honor Dr. Dorothy Height. As it is written in the Gospel of Matthew: “For whoever exalts himself will be humbled, and whoever humbles himself will be exalted.” I don’t think the author of the Gospel would mind me rephrasing: “whoever humbles herself will be exalted.” (Applause.)

    One of my favorite moments with Dr. Height — this was just a few months ago — we had decided to put up the Emancipation Proclamation in the Oval Office, and we invited some elders to share reflections of the movement. And she came and it was a inter-generational event, so we had young children there, as well as elders, and the elders were asked to share stories. And she talked about attending a dinner in the 1940s at the home of Dr. Benjamin Mays, then president of Morehouse College. And seated at the table that evening was a 15-year-old student, “a gifted child,” as she described him, filled with a sense of purpose, who was trying to decide whether to enter medicine, or law, or the ministry.

    And many years later, after that gifted child had become a gifted preacher — I’m sure he had been told to be on his best behavior — after he led a bus boycott in Montgomery, and inspired a nation with his dreams, he delivered a sermon on what he called “the drum major instinct” — a sermon that said we all have the desire to be first, we all want to be at the front of the line.

    The great test of a life, Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. said, is to harness that instinct; to redirect it towards advancing the greater good; toward changing a community and a country for the better; toward doing the Lord’s work.

    I sometimes think Dr. King must have had Dorothy Height in mind when he gave that speech. For Dorothy Height met the test. Dorothy Height embodied that instinct. Dorothy Height was a drum major for justice. A drum major for equality. A drum major for freedom. A drum major for service. And the lesson she would want us to leave with today — a lesson she lived out each and every day — is that we can all be first in service. We can all be drum majors for a righteous cause. So let us live out that lesson. Let us honor her life by changing this country for the better as long as we are blessed to live. May God bless Dr. Dorothy Height and the union that she made more perfect. (Applause.)

    END 10:54 A.M. EDT

  • President Obama official schedule and guidance, April 29, 2010. Height funeral, DNC fund raiser

    THE WHITE HOUSE
    Office of the Press Secretary
    _______________________________________________________________________________________
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    April 28, 2010

    DAILY GUIDANCE AND PRESS SCHEDULE FOR
    THURSDAY, APRIL 29, 2010

    In the morning, the President will receive the Presidential Daily Briefing in the Oval Office. This meeting is closed press.

    Later, the President, the Vice President and the First Lady will attend Dorothy Height’s funeral at the National Cathedral. The President will deliver remarks. This event is open to pre-credentialed media. The Washington National Cathedral is handling media credentials, however the deadline to request credentials has passed. There will be travel pool coverage of the President’s remarks.

    In the afternoon, the President and the Vice President will have lunch in the Private Dining Room. This lunch is closed press. Later, the President will honor the 2010 National Teacher of the Year and the state teachers of the year from all across the country at an event in the Rose Garden. Dr. Jill Biden and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan will join the President for the event. Every President since Harry S. Truman has continued the Presidential tradition of honoring the country’s finest educators. This event is open press.

    Later in the afternoon, the President and the Vice President will meet with Secretary of State Clinton in the Oval Office. This meeting is closed press.

    In the evening, the President will attend a DNC fundraising dinner at a private residence in Washington, DC. Since no formal remarks are planned, the event will be closed press.

    In-Town Travel Pool
    Wires: AP, Reuters, Bloomberg
    Wire Photos: AP, Reuters, AFP
    TV Corr & Crew: FOX
    Print: Baltimore Sun
    Radio: VOA

    EDT

    9:00AM Pool Call Time

    9:00AM THE PRESIDENT receives the Presidential Daily Briefing
    Oval Office
    Closed Press

    10:00AM THE PRESIDENT, THE VICE PRESIDENT and THE FIRST LADY attend Dorothy Height’s funeral; THE PRESIDENT delivers remarks
    National Cathedral
    Open to pre-credentialed media (Travel Pool Gather Time 9:20AM – North Doors of the Palm Room)

    12:30PM THE PRESIDENT and THE VICE PRESIDENT have lunch
    Private Dining Room
    Closed Press

    1:40PM THE PRESIDENT delivers remarks at an event honoring the 2010 National Teacher of the Year
    Rose Garden
    Open Press (Pre-set 10:30AM – Final Gather 1:10PM – North Doors of the Palm Room)

    4:30PM THE PRESIDENT and THE VICE PRESIDENT meet with Secretary of State Clinton
    Oval Office
    Closed Press

    7:35PM THE PRESIDENT attends a DNC fundraising dinner
    Private Residence
    Closed Press (Travel Pool Gather Time 7:00PM – North Doors of the Palm Room)

    Briefing Schedule

    12:00PM Briefing by Press Secretary Robert Gibbs

    ##

  • Obama in Quincy, Ill. on Wall Street reform. Giannoulias shout out. Transcript

    THE WHITE HOUSE
    Office of the Press Secretary
    _________________________________________________________________________________________________
    For Immediate Release April 28, 2010

    REMARKS BY THE PRESIDENT
    Wall Street Reform

    Oakley Lindsay Civic Center
    Quincy, Illinois

    3:44 P.M. CDT

    THE PRESIDENT: Hello, everybody! (Applause.) It’s good to be home. (Applause.) It is good to be back in Quincy! Thank you, everybody. Thank you. It is good to be back in Quincy! (Applause.)

    We’ve got some special guests here I want to acknowledge: the outstanding governor of the great state of Illinois, Patrick Quinn, is here. (Applause.) Your fine mayor, John Spring — give him a big round of applause. (Applause.) Attorney General Lisa Madigan. (Applause.) Treasurer and soon to be senator, Alexi Giannoulias. (Applause.) Secretary of State and tumbler supreme, Jesse White. (Applause.)

    So I missed you guys. (Applause.) You know, now, being President is nice. (Laughter.) You live above the store, so it’s a really short commute. (Laughter.) There’s a nice plane. But one of the toughest things about being President is I don’t get a chance to come home as much I’d like and visit with all of you like I used to. (Applause.) I see a lot of familiar faces in the crowd here.

    Now, part of the problem is, is that when I travel now it kind of causes a ruckus. (Laughter.) I do remember, though, the last time I was here — I think it was in this building — that we were filling up sandbags, weren’t we? (Applause.) And I still remember that day because it was the picture of what America is about. You had people from all different walks of life, the whole community coming together; everybody was working hard; everybody knew that there was a challenge coming from the potential flooding; but everybody was in good spirits because they figured if we’re all working together then there’s no reason why we can’t handle this. We’ve handled things before. (Applause.) And that’s the American spirit on display and that’s the spirit of Quincy and the spirit of Illinois.

    So it’s just good to be reminded of that and to come back and spend some time with you all. We spent a couple of days in Iowa and Missouri and now back here — (applause.) Yea, Missouri! (Applause.) How about Iowa? Have we got some Iowans here? (Applause.) We got a few Iowans — but we are in Illinois. (Applause.)

    But over the last couple of days, we’ve talked to workers who are busy building wind blades for these big wind turbines, and a biofuel plant; families and small business owners trying to navigate through a tough economy; talking to farmers about what’s happening to family farms in the region. And because it’s folks like all of you and towns like Quincy that give America its heartbeat, that’s why it’s so important for me to be able to visit.

    It’s towns like this where working men and women built the American Dream with their bare hands. This is where our roots are. I just met a young man coming in — he says he’s my cousin. There he is, right there. (Laughter.) Seriously, it’s — what is it, fourth generation? Four generations back? I told him he was a little better looking than me. (Laughter.)

    But all of us trace back to this experience of parents, grandparents, great-grandparents building this American Dream — not having much to begin with. And that dream is shared by every Illinoisan and every American — the chance to make a good living, to raise a healthy and secure family, and most of all, to give our kids opportunities that we didn’t have ourselves.

    Now, the truth is, is that sometimes it feels like that dream is slipping away. Times are tough in Quincy. Times are tough all across America. We’ve gone through the worst economy since the Great Depression. Even though our economy is growing again, even though our markets are climbing again and our businesses are finally beginning to create jobs again, there are a lot of folks who still aren’t feeling that recovery in their own lives.

    And I’ve heard their stories across the country. I’ve read it in the letters that I get each night. And a lot of them are worried about whether or not they’re going to be able to sustain their dream for a better life. Many felt that way even before this most recent crisis, even before the economic storm of the past two years. Folks were living up to their responsibilities as best they could, working hard, looking after their families, giving back to their communities, but they kept on finding themselves getting hurt in this economy in ways they didn’t expect. And part of it was because Washington and Wall Street weren’t living up to their responsibilities. (Applause.)

    That’s why I asked to be your President. That’s why so many of you joined the campaign. (Applause.) You joined me because you believed we had it within our power to change things.

    AUDIENCE: Yeah!

    THE PRESIDENT: You figured we could solve the problems that had been holding us back year after year after year, and focus on working Americans again. You believed we could keep the American Dream alive in our time, and for all time. And so that’s what I want to talk about today.

    When I took office, we were in the midst of this historic financial crisis brought on by reckless and irresponsible speculation on Wall Street. (Applause.) That in turn had led to a recession that hammered Main Street across America. And you saw lost jobs and lost homes and lost businesses, and downscaled dreams.

    The first thing we had to do then was mount an aggressive response — to make sure that this terrible recession didn’t turn into another Great Depression. And let’s face it, that required some tough steps to stabilize the financial sector. And some of those steps weren’t popular. I knew they weren’t popular. I’ve got pollsters. (Laughter.) They told me, boy, that’s really going to be unpopular. (Laughter.) But we made those decisions anyway, because the well-being of millions of Americans depended on them. Even if they didn’t poll well, they were the right thing to do. It was the only thing we could do to take those steps. (Applause.)

    So we took these steps to get America back on its feet. We aimed tax relief right at the middle class, the cornerstone of the American Dream. We made sure that we cut taxes for 95 percent of working families, put money in their pockets because they were experiencing hard times — fewer hours or somebody in the family being laid off, making sure that they could still buy groceries and pay the bills to keep the economy afloat.

    We cut taxes for small businesses. We cut taxes for first-time homebuyers. We cut taxes for students and parents paying for college. (Applause.) And all of this — not only did this help those individual families, but it increased purchasing power and spending power for businesses all across the country. And then we extended unemployment benefits and we made COBRA cheaper for folks who had lost their jobs. (Applause.) And then we helped give help to the states. And Pat Quinn will tell you, because of the federal assistance that was provided, we averted some massive layoffs of teachers and police officers and firefighters all across the country. (Applause.)

    So we did what it took to rescue our economy and spark its recovery. And that work goes on. And so I’m pleased to see that we were losing 700,000 jobs a month when I came into office — now we’re gaining jobs. (Applause.) The economy was contracting — now the economy is growing. (Applause.) The markets are back. We’re making progress. We’re moving in the right direction.

    But, keep in mind, I didn’t run for President just to get back to where we were when we started. I want us to do better than we were doing. (Applause.) I want folks to have more opportunity. I want people to have more and better jobs. And I want our young people to be getting better educations and more access to college. (Applause.)

    It’s time to rebuild our economy on a new foundation so that we’ve got real and sustained growth. It’s time to extend opportunity to every corner of Main Street, in every city and every town and every county in America, so that young people don’t feel like they’ve got to move someplace else to make their way. They can stay right here in Quincy. (Applause.) They can stay in Monroe. They can stay in Macon. (Applause.) They can stay in Fort Madison.

    It’s time to create conditions so that Americans who work hard can gain ground again, and they don’t have to take out a bunch of credit card debt. They don’t have to endanger their long-term financial future. And that’s what — that’s at the heart of all our efforts.

    It’s why we made the biggest investment in clean energy in our history, creating middle-class jobs in Middle America that harness the wind and the sun, and biofuels — that won’t be shipped away; jobs that will stay right here in the United States of America, and create energy independence so we don’t have to import as much oil. (Applause.)

    It’s why we took on the special interests and reformed the student loan system so that it works for students, not bankers. (Applause.)

    I don’t know if people paid attention to this. Because we were having such a big debate around health care, people may have missed this. The way the student loan system was working, the federal government was guaranteeing these loans but the banks were still taking billions of dollars of profits out of the student loan program. And my attitude is, well, if we’re guaranteeing them, then where’s the risk? So what are you getting paid for?

    So we said we’ll just lend the money directly to the students. (Applause.) That saved tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending that we’re now reinvesting in making college more affordable and upgrading America’s community colleges, so that every young person in America can get ahead in the 21st century. (Applause.)

    And, yes, Quincy, that’s why we finally passed health reform in America — (applause) — reform that will begin to end some of the worst practices in the insurance industry this year. (Applause.) So this year, they’re going to — they will have to stop dropping you when you get sick. This year, children with preexisting conditions, they’ve got to be able to buy insurance. This year, some of these lifetime limits that mean that you got insurance but you still end up being bankrupt — those practices are going to end. (Applause.)

    And in a few years, millions of families and small business owners are going to have more choice, more competition. You’re going to be able to purchase the same kind of high-quality, affordable care that members of Congress get. And you know that’s going to be pretty good. (Applause.) You know they’re going to give themselves good insurance. You’re going to be able to buy it, too. (Applause.)

    And by the way, this reform will reduce our deficit by more than $1 trillion. (Applause.) And, listen, don’t — this notion — I know the debate was contentious. But the truth of the matter is since I’ve been here, I’ve already met — I was in Mount Pleasant, Iowa, met a woman — (laughter) — met a woman at Jerry’s — you know Jerry’s, right? This is a restaurant there, and met a woman and she said — she came up and she said, “My husband is self-employed. I’m a homemaker. We both have preexisting conditions. We need help now.” And I told her this is exactly why we fought so hard for health care reform.

    And then today, I met a woman who had breast cancer, and she was wondering how soon can we start moving on some of these programs inside the health care legislation.

    This isn’t some abstraction. Sometimes, the folks who were fighting us, they made it sound as if, oh, he just wants big government, this — no. I just want people to be able to not go bankrupt and lose their house when they get sick. (Applause.) I just want them not to have — see their premiums doubled. I don’t want them to be taken advantage of by insurance companies. (Applause.) I want you to get a fair deal and a fair shake. (Applause.) And that’s part of my job as President of the United States of America. (Applause.)

    AUDIENCE MEMBER: I love you!

    THE PRESIDENT: I love you back. (Applause.)

    Now, speaking of — speaking of you getting a fair shake, that’s why we need good old common-sense Wall Street reform. (Applause.) And we need it today. We don’t need it next year. We don’t need to do another study and examine it. We need it now. (Applause.)

    And in case you’re wondering, let me just take a minute to explain why it’s important to you. The crisis we went through, it wasn’t part of the normal economic cycle. What happened was you had some people — not all people — there’s some very decent people here who are in the financial sector — but you had some people on Wall Street who took these unbelievable risks with other people’s money.

    AUDIENCE MEMBER: Damn. (Laughter.)

    THE PRESIDENT: They made bets. They were making bets on what was going to happen in the housing market, and they would create these derivatives and all these instruments that nobody understood. But it was basically operating like a big casino. And it was producing big profits and big bonuses for them, but it was all built on shaky economics and some of these subprime loans that had been given out. And because we did not have common-sense rules in place, those irresponsible practices came awfully close to bringing down our entire economy and millions of dreams along with it.

    We had a system where some on Wall Street could take these risks without fear of failure, because they keep the profits when it was working, and as soon as it went south, they expected you to cover their losses. So it was one of those heads, they tail — tails, you lose.

    So they failed to consider that behind every dollar that they traded, all that leverage they were generating, acting like it was Monopoly money, there were real families out who were trying to finance a home, or pay for their child’s college, or open a business, or save for retirement. So what’s working fine for them wasn’t working for ordinary Americans. And we’ve learned that clearly. It doesn’t work out fine for the country. It’s got to change. (Applause.)

    Now, what we’re doing — I want to be clear, we’re not trying to push financial reform because we begrudge success that’s fairly earned. I mean, I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money. (Laughter.) But part of the American way is you can just keep on making it if you’re providing a good product or you’re providing a good service. We don’t want people to stop fulfilling the core responsibilities of the financial system to help grow the economy.

    I’ve said this before. I’ve said this on Wall Street just last week. I believe in the power of the free market. And I believe in a strong financial system. And when it’s working right, financial institutions, they help make possible families buying homes, and businesses growing, and new ideas taking flight. An entrepreneur may have a great idea, but he may need to borrow some money to make it happen. It would be hard for a lot of us to buy a house — our first house, at least, if we weren’t able to take out a mortgage.

    So there’s nothing wrong with a financial system that helps the economy expand. And there are a lot of good people in the financial industry who are doing things the right way. And it’s in our interest when those firms are strong and when they’re healthy.

    But some of these institutions that operated irresponsibly, they’re not just threatening themselves — they threaten the whole economy. And they threaten your dreams, your prospects, everything that you worked so hard to build.

    So we just want them to operate in a way that’s fair and honest and in the open, so that we don’t have to go through what we’ve already gone through. (Applause.) We want to make sure the financial system doesn’t just work for Wall Street, but it works for Main Street, too. It works for Quincy. It works for Mount Pleasant. It works for Macon and Fort Madison. (Applause.)

    Now, let me explain to you what this reform should look like, because one of the things you discover when you get to Washington is what’s black is white and what’s up is down and sometimes people will —

    AUDIENCE MEMBER: Lie.

    THE PRESIDENT: I didn’t say lie, but — (laughter) — they will tell stories about what’s going on. So let me just be very clear in terms of what we’re proposing on financial reform. First — and I know this is important to you because it’s important to me — we’re going to make sure the American taxpayer is never again on the hook when a Wall Street firm fails. Never again. (Applause.) We don’t want to see another bailout. That’s what this reform does.

    Now, you’ve got some — you had some who were saying, cynically, just claiming the opposite, that somehow this was a bill that institutionalized bailouts. What this bill did was it said, no, if you have a firm on Wall Street that fails, the financial industry is going to pay — not taxpayers. So a vote for reform is a vote to end taxpayer-funded bailouts once and for all. (Applause.) If a crisis like this again happens, financial firms are going to foot the bill. That’s point number one.

    Point number two — we’re going to close the loopholes that allowed derivatives and all these other large, risky deals that don’t make a lot of economic sense and that could threaten our entire economy — we want to bring those deals out into the — out of the dark alleys of our financial system into the light of day, so that everybody knows exactly what’s happening, what risks are being taken — investors, shareholders, everybody knows what’s going on. That’s the second thing.

    Number three — this reform is going to give you more power because we’re going to put in place the strongest consumer financial protections in history. (Applause.) Because — and the reason this is important — the reason this is important, this crisis wasn’t just the result of what happened on Wall Street. It also happened because there were a lot of decisions by folks out on Main Street who were taking out mortgages they didn’t understand, credit cards they didn’t understand, auto loans that weren’t a good deal. Some took on obligations they couldn’t afford. But millions of others were deceived or misled by shifting terms and confusing conditions and forests of fine print.

    And your attorney general, Lisa Madigan, has been fighting on behalf of consumers in this state and she knows how badly we need these protections. (Applause.) In fact, Lisa and a bunch of other attorney generals came to testify on behalf of the need for these consumer protection bills because they see this stuff in their offices every day. And it’s true all across the country.

    Now, some argue that giving consumers more information in clear, concise ways is somehow going to stifle competition. I believe the opposite. See, I think if you know what you’re buying, you can make a good decision. And that means that the companies, instead of competing to see who can offer the most confusing products, companies will have to compete the old-fashioned way: by offering the best product. (Applause.)

    But that’s not going to reduce innovation or competition. You just should be knowing what you’re buying. It’s like a lemon law, right? You don’t want to go into the used car lot and get something where they’ve changed the odometer and put a fresh coat of paint on some old beater and pretend like it’s a new car. Well, it’s the same thing with financial products. You should know what you’re getting.

    All right, so that’s the third thing. Finally, we’re going to give the people who own these companies, these financial companies — mainly investors and pension holders and shareholders like many of you — we want you to have more say in the way they’re run. Because some of these firms, they’ve got these huge salaries, huge bonuses that create a perverse incentive to encourage people to take reckless risks. But if you own stock in these companies, you need to get some say in how they operate. (Applause.) You’ll get to decide how managers are paid and how those firms operate. And that means that we’ll actually increase the connection between Main Street and Wall Street. They’ll be more accountable to you.

    So that’s the reform we’ve put forward. (Applause.) These are the reforms that we’re putting forward: Accountability — which means no more bailouts. Closing loopholes — no more trading of things like derivatives in the shadows. Consumer protections — no more deceptive products. A say on pay — so that we give shareholders a more powerful voice. That’s what we’re trying to do.

    Now, I don’t think this should be a partisan issue. Everybody — Republicans, and Democrats, and independents — were hurt by this crisis. So everybody should want to fix it. So I’m very pleased that after a few days of delay, it appears an agreement may be at hand to allow this debate to move forward on the Senate floor on this critical issue. (Applause.) I’m very pleased by that.

    And I want to work with anyone — Republican or Democrat — who wants to pursue these reforms in good faith. And there can be some legitimate differences on certain issues, but the bottom line is consumers have to be protected. We have to end bailouts. We’ve got to make sure that these trading practices are out in the open. We’ve got to make sure that people have a say in terms of how these firms operate so they’re more accountable.

    So as long as we’re adhering to those clear principles, then I feel okay. What I don’t want is a deal made that is written by the financial industry lobbyists. We’ve had enough of that. (Applause.) We’ve had enough of that. I want to listen to what they have to say, but I don’t them writing the bill. I don’t want Democrats and Republicans agreeing to a bill written by them, for them. I want a bill that’s written for you, for the American people. (Applause.)

    So we’re going to see how this debate unfolds. We’re going to get this done. And we’re going to get it done because you demand it. It’s been two years since this crisis, born on Wall Street, slammed into Main Street with its full fury. And while things aren’t nearly back to normal out here, they’re getting back to normal pretty quick up there. Some in Washington think this debate is moving too fast. They think, well, this is kind of a political game; let’s see how this whole thing can play to our advantage in November.

    See, that’s not how I play. I’ve been calling for better rules on Wall Street since 2007, before this crisis happened. (Applause.) So I don’t think we’re moving too fast. I think we’ve been moving too slow. It’s time to get this done. And I don’t think you want to see us wait for another year or two years. I don’t think you think Washington is moving too fast. (Applause.) I think you want to get this done. (Applause.)

    You shouldn’t have to wait another day for the protections from some of the practices that got us into this mess. We can’t let the recovery that’s finally beginning to take hold fall prey to a whole new round of recklessness. If we don’t learn the lessons of this crisis, we doom ourselves to repeat it. And I refuse to let that happen. (Applause.) So the time for reform is now. (Applause.)

    Quincy, let me just say this. Through all the noise and the lobbyists and the partisanship — and I know sometimes you’re watching TV and saying, sheesh, everybody is yelling and hollering, and why are they so mad? But this debate comes down to a simple choice: Are we going to go down the same road, where irresponsibility of a few can put millions of families at risk and stick taxpayers with a tab?

    AUDIENCE: No!

    THE PRESIDENT: Or are we going to protect consumers, and strengthen our financial system, and put rules in place that keep this from happening ever again? (Applause.) Are we going to give in to the special interests, or are we going to score another victory for the American people? (Applause.) Are we going to stick with the status quo? Or are we going to bring about fundamental change that makes things work for ordinary Americans? (Applause.)

    We’ve got the power to do something about this. That’s all it comes down to — the will to act. I still believe we can come together, just like you all came together during those floods, filling those sandbags — everybody joining together, everybody breaking a little sweat, everybody helping out. That’s how America got built. (Applause.)

    We are not powerless in the face of our challenges. We don’t quit when things get tough. We’re not afraid. (Applause.) When something happens, we come together. We move forward. We act. We are Americans — our destiny is written by us, not for us. (Applause.) And if we remember that and summon that spirit once again, we’re going to strengthen our economy today and tomorrow, and restore security to the middle class. (Applause.)
    That’s what we’re fighting for — the American Dream right here in Quincy, right here in Illinois, all across the country. (Applause.)

    God bless you, and God bless the United States of America. Thank you. (Applause.)

    END 4:16 P.M. CDT

  • Obama gives Giannoulias shout out in Quincy

    WASHINGTON–President Obama gave Democratic Illinois Senate nominee Alexi Giannoulias a shout out while in Quincy, Ill. to deliver a speech on Wall Street greed and the need for the GOP to help pass his package of financial system reforms.

    Giannoulias, attending in his official roll as the Illinois state treasurer was called a
    a “soon-to-be senator” by Obama while making introductions in his speech. This morning, White House deputy press secretary Bill Burton said not to expect a shout-out because the event was governmental, not political.

  • Democratic chief Kaine says “civil war” within GOP

    WASHINGTON–Democratic National Committee Chairman Tim Kaine said Wednesday there is a “civil war” within the GOP.

    Kaine made his remarks at a lunch sponsored by the Christian Science Monitor, where he discussed the new DNC program to energize for the November mid-term elections some 15 million first time voters the Obama campaign recruited in 2008.

    Republicans are wrestling with Tea Party activists, an “energy” Democrats take seriously, Kaine said. Unlike Republicans, Democrats, Kaine said are unified.

    “We don’t have a civil war going on within the Democratic Party. You know, we know who our leader is, it is the President. The other side has a civil war, that is ‘who is our leader, which faction are we going to follow’ and the other side tends to have a little more of a litmus test- ‘if you are not with us, we are going to throw you out.’

    “That’s not who we are. Not that we agree on everything, but we are usually at least singing in harmony, if not the same note. But there is a real battle going on on the other side.”

  • GOP uses Rep. Aaron Schock (R-Ill.) to push back on Obama Quincy, Ill. visit

    WASHINGTON–President Obama is in Quincy, Ill. today to deliver a speech on Wall Street reform–where he will probably beat up Senate Republicans for blocking the Democratic financial reform bill. To push back, Rep. Aaron Schock (R-Ill.) who represents a neighboring district, will be part of a conference call to comment on Obama’s Illinois visit.

    Meanwhile, the Republican National Committee on Wednesday released an Illinois-specific memo (click below) slamming the impact of Obama policies.

    Below, release from the Republican National Committee….

    JUST A GLIMPSE AT WHAT WHITE HOUSE TO MAIN STREET REALLY MEANS

    JOB LOSSES
    Since The Stimulus Was Passed, Over 187,000 Jobs Have Been Lost In Illinois. (U.S. Bureau Of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov, Accessed 4/26/10)

    Since The Stimulus Was Passed, Unemployment Has Increased By Over 32 Percent In Illinois, From 8.7 Percent To 11.5 Percent. (U.S. Bureau Of Labor Statistics, www.bls.gov, Accessed 4/26/10)

    WASTE, FRAUD AND ABUSE
    Cost-Of-Living Adjustments Are Being Counted As Jobs In Illinois. “Hilary Freeman, vice president of quality and performance at the society, said 34 employees got cost-of-living adjustments from stimulus funds. But that’s been counted as 34 jobs created or saved.” (James Janega, “Billions In Stimulus Cash For Illinois, But Jobs Harder To Quantify,” The Chicago Tribune, 11/24/09)

    Biden Held Chicago Factory Up As “Poster Child” For Green Stimulus Jobs, But Few Jobs Have Been Created. “Vice President Biden visited the factory in April, holding it up as a poster child for green jobs created by the $787 billion stimulus act. … But months after Serious Materials chief executive Kevin Surace planned to be churning out windows, the factory still has very few customers and has hired back fewer than 20 workers. In fact, Surace said the company is spending $100,000 a week just to keep the factory open.” (Kari Lydersen, “Stimulus Funds Yet To Open Many Windows,” The Washington Post, 10/18/09)

    A HEALTH CARE AGENDA THAT WILL CRUSH ILLINOIS JOBS
    Peoria Based Caterpillar Inc. Said Obama’s Bill Would Increase Their Costs By $100 Million In First Year, “Place [Them] At A Disadvantage Versus [Their] Global Competitors.” “Caterpillar Inc. said the health-care overhaul legislation being considered by the U.S. House would increase the company’s health-care costs by more than $100 million in the first year alone. … ‘We can ill-afford cost increases that place us at a disadvantage versus our global competitors,’ said the letter signed by Gregory Folley, vice president and chief human resources officer of Caterpillar. ‘We are disappointed that efforts at reform have not addressed the cost concerns we’ve raised throughout the year.’” (“Caterpillar: Health Care Bill Would Cost It $100M,” Dow Jones Newswires, 3/19/10)

    Chicago Based Exelon Corp. Expects $65 Million Hit In Q1 As A Result Of Obama’s Government-Run Health Care Experiment. “Exelon Corp., the largest operator of nuclear plants in the United States, expects a non-cash charge of about $65 million in the first quarter of 2010 due to the recently passed healthcare reform law. The reduced income tax deductions are also estimated to increase Exelon’s total annual income tax expense by about $10 million to $15 million, the company said in a filing with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission.” (“Exelon To Take $65M Hit From Healthcare Reform,” Reuters, 4/1/10)

    Moline’s John Deere, Is Losing $150 Million This Year Because Of Dems’ Government-Run Health Care Law. “Deere & Company, Iowa’s largest manufacturing employer, said in a statement this morning that the recently-passed health care legislation will cost the company $150 million after tax this year… Golden said Deere and other companies warned congress in a letter last December that the imposition of a tax on the prescription costs would force publicly-traded corporations like Deere to publicly account for the extra costs. Deere said the impact of the legislation had not been included in its forecast for a profit of $1.3 billion for this year…” (Dan Piller, “Deere Says Health Care Bill Will Cost It $150 Million,” The Des Moines Register’s “Green Fields” Blog, 3/25/10)

    “Instead of travelling half way across the country on a ‘Main Street’ tour, maybe the President should have stayed home and thought about some new initiatives to get Americans back to work instead of the same old tax and spend policies that Americans reject.” – Ryan Tronovitch, RNC Spokesman

  • House declines cost of living raise–only 15–all Democrats–vote for boost

    WASHINGTON–All Illinois House members–not being loony in an election year–did not support Congress getting a cost of living raise in fiscal year 2011 in a Tuesday vote. The pay raise measure failed on a 402-15 vote.

    Click below for the names of the 15….

    —- NAYS 15 —

    Clyburn
    Conyers
    Edwards (MD)
    Ellison
    Jackson Lee (TX)
    Johnson, E. B.
    Kilpatrick (MI)
    Lee (CA)
    Meeks (NY)
    Moran (VA)
    Payne
    Thompson (MS)
    Towns
    Watt
    Woolsey

  • Democratic National Committee slams GOP for blocking Wall Street reforms

    OFA wall street.jpg

    WASHINGTON–Senate Democrats–for a second time–on Tuesday could not muster enough votes to debate their Wall Street reform measure–with every Republican voting no. Democrats are using the GOP no votes to rally their troops. A third vote is set for Wednesday and Senate Republicans are expected to again vote no.

    No matter the GOP reasons for voting no–the White House and the Democrats are using the no votes to hit the GOP as being out of touch after the worst financial meltdown since the Depression.

    The Democratic National Committee’s Organizing for America operation–(the DNC absorbed the Obama for President campaign, which is why OFA uses the Obama campaign logo)—- on Tuesday night started sending e-mails to the millions on its mailing list. “OFA is taking an aggressive stance — calling out the opponents of Wall Street reform by name in each state — and ramping up grassroots pressure nationally,” I was told. Also: OFA is planning a Day of Action on financial reform next week.

    And on Wednesday morning, the Democratic National Committee released a spot titled “Risky Business” slamming Republicans for “taking the side of big Wall Street banks over the Main Street families.”

    The ad runs in Washington and on national cable outlets.

    This comes as President Obama on Wednesday delivers a speech on the need for Wall Street reform in Quincy, Ill., the last leg on a “Wall Street to Main Street” Midwest swing– that took him to Iowa and Missouri.

    The Tuesday 57-to-41 roll call was not enough to block a filibuster. Democrats needed 60 votes to start floor debate.

    below, ad text…

    VO: Wall Street’s risky bets nearly sank our economy
    CHYRON: Dow Jones Plummets in Early Trading [Washington Post, September 15, 2008]
    CHYRON: WORST CRISIS SINCE ’30S, WITH NO END IN SIGHT [The Wall Street Journal, September 28, 2008]
    CHYRON: A Financial Drama With No Final Act In Sight [The New York Times, September 14, 2008]

    VO: But when it came to Wall Street reform that would protect consumers and prevent future bailouts
    CHYRON: But on Wall Street Reform to Protect Consumers and Prevent Bailouts

    VO: Every Senate Republican voted no
    CHYRON: Every Republican Senator Voted No

    VO: Republicans voted to block reform after a fundraiser with Wall Street lobbyists
    VIDEO: Bank Lobbyists Huddle For Another Secret Meeting With GOP Senators [Think Progress, 4/22/2010]

    VO: Republicans stood by as Wall Street ran wild
    CHYRON: Republicans Stood By As Wall Street Ran Wild

    VO: Tell Republicans – if they side with Wall Street over Main Street, you won’t be siding with them
    CHYRON: TELL REPUBLICANS: If they side with Wall Street over Main Street, you won’t be siding with them.

    [DNC DISCLAIMER]

  • President Obama official schedule and guidance, April 28, 2010. Quincy, Ill. Wall St. speech

    THE WHITE HOUSE
    Office of the Press Secretary
    _______________________________________________________________________________________
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
    April 27, 2010

    DAILY GUIDANCE AND PRESS SCHEDULE FOR
    WEDNESDAY, APRIL 28, 2010

    The President will continue the White House to Main Street tour with stops in Missouri and Illinois. In the early afternoon, he will tour POET Biorefining in Macon, Missouri and talk to workers about what they are experiencing during these tough economic times and share ideas for rebuilding our economy in the long term. There will be travel pool coverage of the tour. The President will then deliver remarks and share ideas for rebuilding our economy in the long term. This event is open press.

    Following his visit to POET Biorefining, the President will tour a local farm and visit with the family who operates the farm. There will be travel pool coverage.

    Later in the afternoon, President Obama will deliver remarks on the urgent need to pass financial reform and will discuss how strong Wall Street reform will protect American families on Main Street at the Oakley Lindsay Civic Center in Quincy, Illinois. This event is open press.

    The President will return to Washington, DC in the evening. The arrival on the South Lawn in open press.

    In-Town Travel Pool
    Wires: AP, Reuters, Bloomberg
    Wire Photos: AP, Reuters, AFP
    TV Corr & Crew: CNN
    Print: Washington Times
    Radio: Talk Radio

    Out-of-Town Travel Pool
    Wires: AP, Reuters, Bloomberg
    Wire Photos: AP, Reuters, AFP
    TV Corr & Crew: CNN
    Print: New York Times

    CDT

    9:30AM THE PRESIDENT departs Des Moines, Iowa en route Quincy, Illinois
    Des Moines International Airport
    Open Press

    10:15AM THE PRESIDENT arrives in Quincy, Illinois
    Quincy Regional Airport
    Open Press

    12:20PM THE PRESIDENT tours POET Biorefining
    Macon, Missouri
    Travel Pool Coverage

    1:00PM THE PRESIDENT delivers remarks on rebuilding our economy
    POET Biorefining, Macon, Missouri
    Open Press

    2:20PM THE PRESIDENT tours a local farm and visits with the family that operates the farm
    Palmyra, Missouri
    Travel Pool Coverage

    4:00PM THE PRESIDENT delivers remarks on the urgent need to pass Wall Street reform
    Oakley Lindsay Civic Center, Quincy, Illinois
    Open Press

    5:15PM THE PRESIDENT departs Quincy, Illinois en route Andrews Air Force Base
    Quincy Regional Airport
    Open Press

    EDT

    7:30PM In-Town Travel Pool Call Time

    8:05PM THE PRESIDENT arrives at Andrews Air Force Base
    Out-of-Town Travel Pool

    8:20PM THE PRESIDENT arrives at the White House
    South Lawn
    Open Press (Pre-set 7:50PM – Final Gather 8:05PM – North Doors of the Palm Room)

    Briefing Schedule

    Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton will gaggle aboard Air Force One

    ##

  • Obama and Giannoulias at Quincy Wednesday

    WASHINGTON–Don’t expect President Obama to give a campaign-related shoutout to Illinois Democratic Senate nominee Alexi Giannoulias when Obama delivers a speech in Quincy on Wednesday because it is a government, not a political event, White House Deputy Press Secretary Bill Burton said Tuesday.

    Obama flew to the Midwest on Tuesday on a swing to include stops in Quincy and events in Iowa and Missouri.

    Burton, during a briefing, was asked about Giannoulias, an Obama friend who is the Illinois state treasurer. Giannoulias will be in Quincy in his role as an elected official–not a candidate. All statewide elected officials in the states were invited.

    Burton was asked, “Do you think the President is going to acknowledge his presence and talk a little bit about his campaign, which is sort of having some trouble at the moment,” a reference to the failure last week of the family controlled Broadway Bank.

    Replied Burton, “I don’t think it would be appropriate for the President to talk about anybody’s campaign at what are all official events.”

  • Sarah Palin headlines Illinois GOP fund raiser May 12, Rosemont

    BY ABDON M. PALLASCH
    Sun-Times Political Reporter

    CHICAGO–Former Vice-presidential candidate Sarah Palin has agreed to appear at a fund-raiser for the Illinois Republican Party while she’s in town May 12.

    Palin, the former Alaska governor who now travels the country as a speaker and author, had already scheduled “An Evening with Sarah Palin” at the Allstate Arena in Rosemont at 7 p.m. that Wednesday night. Tickets for that event started at $56.

    Sarah Palin will appear at a fund-raiser for the Illinois Republican Party in Rosemont on May 12.

    Illinois Republican Party Chairman Patrick Brady announced Tuesday that three hours before that event she would appear at the Westin in Rosemont for a party to boost the state party’s coffers.

    For the rest of the story…

  • Rahm Emanuel in Chicago

    In Chicago on Tuesday, White House chief of staff Rahm Emanuel tells the Chicago press corps, ‘You guys gotta start drinking decaf,’ after reporters asked him about his admission last week that one day he want to be Chicago mayor. Below, my Sun-Times colleagues report on Emanuel at the Richard J. Daley Global Cities Forum at the University of Illinois in Chicago.

    BY ABDON M. PALLASCH AND FRAN SPIELMAN

    Chicago Sun-Times Staff Reporters
    CHICAGO–President Obama’s Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel tried to tamp down talk about him running for Mayor of Chicago as he appeared Tuesday at the Richard J. Daley annual Global Cities Forum at UIC.

    At the same time, Emanuel gave what might be construed as a window into how he would govern as mayor, advocating a regional approach, cooperating with suburbs to tackle problems. Emanuel shared the stage with mayors of Paris and Philadelphia.

    “Emanuel has recently expressed an interest in being mayor of the city of Chicago AFTER Mayor Daley steps down,” moderator Judy Woodruff said. “But the consensus is that before that happens he’s going to have to get some real experience.”

    As laughter broke out, Emanuel said, “I’m smiling.”

    When reporters pressed him on the issue, Emanuel told them to calm down, implying it was their questions — not his statement of interest in running for mayor on Charlie Rose’ national talk show last week — driving the discussion.

    “You know we have our home here,” Emanuel said, trying to beg off questions. “I can’t wait. At some point in the future… Don’t over-interpret anything. Don’t everybody get excited. At some point, when we come back, which is always our goal, which is why we rented the house. … You guys are way too excited. You guys gotta start drinking decaf.”

    for the rest of the story…

  • Giannoulias spot tries to pin Broadway Bank failure on Kirk. Kirk replies

    After the Giannoulias spot was released, the Kirk campaign on Tuesday sent out a reply:

    below, from the Kirk campaign…

    The Alexi Giannoulias Spin Cycle

    From loans to criminals to the collapse of his bank, Alexi has a history of spinning inconvenient truths

    Alexi Giannoulias is employing a serious spin cycle as he attempts to elicit sympathy for his reckless decisions that brought down his family bank and cost the FDIC $394 million. As it has often been the case throughout his career, Mr. Giannoulias resorts to pointing fingers when he finds himself in an inconvenient situation.

    Bright Start: When the Bright Start college fund lost $150 million of Illinois families’ college savings, Alexi loudly blamed the fund manager, Oppenheimer Funds. Alexi neglected to mention that he chose Oppenheimer to manage Bright Start, and that he was well aware that certain Bright Start funds were having problems in April of 2008, six months before he eventually pulled out of the troubled funds. [1]

    Loans to Criminals: When Alexi’s loans to convicted bookie and pimp Michael “Jaws” Giorango first came to light during his 2006 Illinois Treasurer campaign, Giannoulias called him “a very nice person”, and disputed Giorango’s criminal record saying “I don’t know what the charges are that makes him this huge crime figure.”[2] When asked in an interview whether it was acceptable for the State Treasurer to invest money with crime figures, Giannoulias replied that the Treasurer must get “the best rate of return.”[3]

    When those excuses didn’t fly, Giannoulias claimed he had no role in the loans, even though he was Chief Loan Officer, saying “If it was up to me, I probably would have recommended against these loans.”[4]

    When asked for more details in the Senate campaign about how Giorango came to get loans at Broadway Bank, Giannoulias hid behind his deceased father, saying “It’s tough to ask my father questions.”[5]

    Broadway’s Collapse: Alexi said nobody could have foreseen the problems that led to Broadway Bank’s collapse. But Broadway Bank had 12 times the national average of risky “hot money” brokered deposits.[6] The dangers associated with brokered deposits have been well-known since the Savings and Loan crisis, and the New York Times called them “one of the primary factors in the accelerating wave of failures among small and regional banks nationwide.”[7]

    Now Alexi is claiming it is Congressman Kirk’s fault.

    Alexi Giannoulias has a big problem. Last week, federal regulators closed his family’s money-losing Broadway Bank, where he acquired the financial expertise he touted in running for state treasurer in 2006. So where does he place the blame? On Mark Kirk, his opponent in the race for the U.S. Senate.

    … As it is, Broadway’s losses are far bigger than most other failed banks, amounting to a third of its assets. “The real question is why it wasn’t closed a long time ago,” says Washington, D.C.-area banking consultant Bert Ely. “It was a badly run bank.”

    A badly run bank. Someone is to blame for that, and it isn’t Mark Kirk. (Chicago Tribune, 4/27/10)

    There are serious questions about Broadway Bank and how it got to this point that Alexi will have to answer as his campaign moves forward. As we enter Alexi’s Spin Cycle, how will Alexi spin this?

    Did Alexi Giannoulias pull his campaign funds out of Broadway before it failed?

    The FDIC only insures up to $250,000. Given the deadline imposed by the FDIC, did Alexi change banks to protect his campaign cash, or did he leave it in Broadway because he had advance knowledge that the bank would be acquired?

  • Obama debt commission holds first meeting; Schakowsky statement

    below, Schakowsky release….

    REP. SCHAKOWSKY MAKES OPENING REMARKS AT FIRST MEETING OF PRESIDENT OBAMA’S FISCAL COMMISSION

    WASHINGTON, DC (April 27, 2010) – Rep. Jan Schakowsky (IL-9) released the following statement today. As prepared for delivery, Schakowsky made the following remarks at the inaugural meeting of President Obama’s National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform. Schakowsky is one of 18 members appointed to the bipartisan commission.

    “I am honored to be a member of President Obama’s Fiscal Commission and thank Speaker Pelosi for this opportunity to participate.

    “We are all here today charged with a critical mission: “Identifying policies to improve the fiscal situation in the medium term and to achieve fiscal sustainability over the long run.”

    “We gather here today, not as accountants, actuaries, bean counters looking through green eye shades at columns of numbers, but as policy-makers who care deeply about the lives of the American people of today and tomorrow who are impacted by the economic policies of our country. As the President said last week, “…some on Wall Street forgot that behind every dollar traded or leveraged there’s a family looking to buy a house, or pay for an education, open a business, save for retirement. What happens on Wall Street has real consequences across the country, across our economy.”

    “The exact same can be said about the task in which we are engaged. Balancing the budget and reducing the debt are not ends in and of themselves. The welfare of the American people must be the goal of our fiscal policy. Everything we do here must be measured in terms of the impact on the well-being of our people, the opportunities we provide to our children and the values of our democratic society.

    “Much will be said about what we can and cannot afford. These questions must be considered in the broadest possible context. For example, I believe that we can’t afford to skimp on educating our children, assuring access to quality, affordable health care and retirement security, achieving energy independence, investing in our infrastructure, supporting medical research, and creating more jobs. Bottom line, while we are committed to freeing our children and grandchildren from crippling debt, we must be just a committed to assuring that they are not ignorant, sick and unemployed.

    “There also are many items and practices we can’t afford to continue that I intend to put on the table. We can’t afford to continue paying for armies of insurance company bureaucrats who do nothing but deny claims while CEOs take multimillion dollar salaries and bonuses. We can’t afford costly procurement and contracting policies that result in fraud and abuse. We can’t afford tax loopholes that incentivize moving American jobs overseas. We can’t afford to pay for outdated and ineffective cold war weapons systems. We can’t afford to deploy 200,000 American service men and women plus as many contractors in Iraq and Afghanistan indefinitely. We can’t afford to let Wall Street run amok. Frankly I’ve heard enough sanctimonious statements by the most entitled about entitlement programs, Wall Street bankers who pay themselves tens of millions in bonuses while lecturing retirees who bring home an average of $18,000 per year about tightening their belts.

    “We must acknowledge that the current deficit is not solely the result of spending and tax policy. A substantial cause of the current deficit was the recklessness of big Wall Street banks that cost 8 million Americans their jobs and failure of regulatory policies that were needed to prevent our financial sector from spinning out of control. A recession like the current one is no time to make the same mistakes that led to a double-dip downturn in the 1930’s. A short-term reduction of the deficit is the worst thing we could do for the economy. We need government spending to create the jobs that drive continued economic growth.

    “I am absolutely convinced that our mission is not impossible. We’ve done it before, just over a decade ago. We ushered in an era of fiscal responsibility during the Clinton Administration, creating over 20 million jobs, producing budget surpluses and rapidly declining debt, and we can do it again. We’ve already begun to see signs of progress. Americans should be confident that we have it within our power to fully restore the economy and the soundness of the federal budget while keeping our commitment to both our grandparents and our grandchildren.

    “Americans should feel confident that this great country can continue the American tradition of each generation looking forward to an even better life than the one that came before it. It is up to us to show the way.”

    — ## —

  • Greta Van Susteren interviews Blagojevich

    WASHINGTON–Greta Van Susteren talked to former Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich about his defense strategy to try to subpoena President Obama for his criminal trial. Van Susteren interviewed Blagojevich at his North Side Chicago home.

    Click below for transcript.

    Below, transcript from Fox News…..

    GRETA VAN SUSTEREN, FOX NEWS HOST: Now, you are going to Chicago, to the private home of former governor Rod Blagojevich, where in the very early morning of December 9th, 2008, the FBI barged in and he was arrested. Former governor Blagojevich is accused of, in essence, trying to sell then Senator Obama’s open Senate seat to the highest bidder. Governor Blagojevich goes “On the Record” about this upcoming trial.

    (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

    VAN SUSTEREN: Governor, nice to see you.

    ROD BLAGOJEVICH, FORMER ILLINOIS GOVERNOR: Thanks for being here.

    VAN SUSTEREN: All right, Governor, you’re in a little bit of a fix. You’ve this trial coming up June 3rd, and a lot of pre-trial matters have come to light recently and I want to talk to you about — let’s start first with the tapes. The prosecution has wiretapped you, has tapes of you, and there’s a dispute over what’s going to be played in court. What’s the dispute?

    BLAGOJEVICH: Well, they taped my conversations for six weeks. Our government came in to the sanctity of this home, actually, and put the wiretaps on these telephones and a lot of other telephones.

    I’ve taken the position from the very beginning that I’m innocent of everything and anything they’re falsely accusing me of, and that a lot of the truth can be found in those tapes. And from the beginning, I’ve said, Play all the tapes.

    My lawyers were instructed by me to challenge the government. We waived the opportunity to challenge the tapes, happily did that, and challenged the government to say that, Allow both sides to play any tape they want. They should play anything they want to play in court and let us play any tape that we want to play in court. The government declined to comment, and then they’ve recently gone into court, the snuck into court to try to get the judge to rule that all the tapes should not be played.

    This case in so many ways is upside down. Mr. Fitzgerald, the prosecutor, invades the sanctity of my home. The government is in here looking at those private conversations. Those are his tapes and he’s going to court to suppress his own tapes. And I’m the one saying play them all because I note the truth is on those tapes and will show I did nothing wrong.

    VAN SUSTEREN: You say he snuck into court. You had no notice the prosecutor was going into court and say we only want to play these tapes and not all the tapes?

    BLAGOJEVICH: The way the motion was written by the government with footnotes and buried in the body of a motion that was filled with a lot of other things was an incipient request to suggest that not all the tapes be heard. They even misled and said the judge ruled that all the tapes wouldn’t be played which was not the case at the time they filed the motion.

    VAN SUSTEREN: Has your lawyer heard all these tapes?

    BLAGOJEVICH: We had tapes for months.

    VAN SUSTEREN: You have copies of the tapes?

    BLAGOJEVICH: Yes.

    Let me say this. I’ve been consistent from the beginning. From the moment I was falsely accused, I said long before we had access to the tapes, play all the tapes, because I know who I am and I would not do the things they are suggesting that I did.

    And I know that notwithstanding some language on the tapes, the use of pro fan, which I have apologized for. I didn’t know —

    VAN SUSTEREN: That is not a crime.

    Do you have any idea how many hours of tapes the prosecution intends to play at your June 3rd trial?

    BLAGOJEVICH: I don’t know that. But what I do know is they have in a very dishonest way taken selective snippets of conversations out of context, purposely misleading the people and purposely providing false information.

    VAN SUSTEREN: They’ve identified what tapes they are going to play? You know what they are going to play?

    BLAGOJEVICH: No. They’ve quoted some of them. They’ve released a couple of them. And they’ve done it in a way where snippets of conversations were taken out of context.

    And if you are allowed to listen to the breadth of the conversation — again, I can’t comment on what is on the tapes. The very government that taped me went into court to say I can’t what is on them nor can I allow to you take a look at them.

    VAN SUSTEREN: There’s a gag order ton this part of it, the contents of the tape?

    BLAGOJEVICH: That’s correct. And the government sought that gag order. They’ve been free to take snippets of conversation out whenever they choose to do it, and it is designed to mislead the public.

    VAN SUSTEREN: Hasn’t the judge said, OK Governor Blagojevich, you identify what tapes you want heard and I’ll consider it so it is not a complete bar at this point?

    BLAGOJEVICH: That’s correct. The judge seems to be a fair and thoughtful man. He’s obviously a very smart, intelligent man who understands and knows the law. So he has said two things. He said one publicly that if I testify that he wail will you us to play the tapes we want to play.

    VAN SUSTEREN: Just if you testify, not for a doctrine of complete? Let’s say hypothetically, a tape is put on that has half a thought, and it is your position that half of thought falsely convoys a message. Are you allowed to play the entire thought without having to take the witness stand?

    BLAGOJEVICH: I don’t know that yet. The judge has said that if I testify, which will, by the way, he will allow us to play the tapes that we ask for. This is as I’ve been told by my attorneys.

    And the judge said in the last court day, and I was there because I challenged the prosecutor to be there too, to explain why he’s preventing all the tapes from being heard except the tapes that he went out and got.

    But the judge said that — instructed my lawyers to submit to him the different tapes that we would be requesting to be heard in court. And so, I’m cautiously optimistic and hopeful he will say yes.

    VAN SUSTEREN: What is the prosecution’s opposition? Do they think you are going to waste a lot of time and play 400 inconsequential conversations and bore the jury to death or do they have a more sinister purpose to evade, confuse, or do something with the jury?

    BLAGOJEVICH: I fervently believe the prosecution is trying to cover- up their misdeeds.

    VAN SUSTEREN: Which misdeeds?

    BLAGOJEVICH: That they arrested a sitting governor and falsely accused him of things he didn’t do and did it in a super sensational press conference on December the ninth, 2008, this is what Mr. Fitzgerald did. And e used and quoted from the tapes from snippets of the tapes to suggest that was the basis for arresting a governor in a state like Illinois — unprecedented.

    And he did it, and he said, and I’m quoting, that he was doing to “stop a crime spree.” The reality is when people hear the whole truth and hear what was on those conversations, the days and weeks leading up to those acts by the government, by the prosecutors, there was no crime spree. He lied.

    VAN SUSTEREN: Why did he do that? Just for the sake of lying or something more sinister? Not that lying isn’t sinister.

    BLAGOJEVICH: I believe the effort to prevent all the tapes being played is designed to keep justice from being heard in court as it is to cover-up their wrongdoing and misdeeds.

    To suggest you should — to arrest a sitting governor, to state in a press conference where the whole world is listening that you have a governor trying to sell a Senate seat for money which the allegation he made at the press conversation that he had heard conversations over the telephone, had to come in at 6:00 in the morning in my home where my little girls are sleeping, invade the privacy of our home to say they had to stop the crime spree before it happened is just a flat out lie.

    The tapes show what the truth is. I have said from the beginning play all the tapes. Why is my accuser is trying to prevent the full truth from being heard? I believe part of it is because he’s covering up the fact that he told this big lie that foreseeably led to a chain of events that would remove a governor from office that would undo the will of a people, undo an election, and he doesn’t ever want anybody to know that’s what he did.

    There’s a smoking gun on these tapes, and that smoking gun is directed and pointed at the prosecutor.

    (END VIDEOTAPE)

    VAN SUSTEREN: Next the question we all want answered — why does former governor Blagojevich want to call President Obama to the witness stand? More with governor Blagojevich, next.

    (COMMERCIAL BREAK)

    (NEWS BREAK)

    VAN SUSTEREN: Continuing with former governor Rod Blagojevich. Now, why does governor Blagojevich want to put President Obama on the witness stand? We went to Chicago to find out.

    (BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)

    VAN SUSTEREN: You are in essence accused of selling the Senate seat vacated by President Obama. Everyone that you ever had a conversation with about that Senate seat, is there any way you could have spoken to someone and not have it tapped. Did you have a conversation in the car, for instance, with the other person?

    BLAGOJEVICH: I had a conversation with Senator Dick Durbin.

    VAN SUSTEREN: Where?

    BLAGOJEVICH: In my office in Chicago.

    VAN SUSTEREN: Was your office bugged?

    BLAGOJEVICH: They say it wasn’t. So Senator Durbin and I, we spoke about the Senate seat, and he offered to be a go between. I decided that my first choice I was going to try to appoint the daughter of my political nemesis, the House speaker was blocking a public works bill that would create 500,000 jobs he was blocking, health care for over 300,000 families, working people in writing.

    And I wanted a guarantee in writing to not raise taxes on people.

    VAN SUSTEREN: They say they didn’t bug your office.

    BLAGOJEVICH: The office downtown Chicago, that conversation with Senator Durbin, my recollection was there. Bu I spoke to Senator Harry Reid —

    VAN SUSTEREN: On the phone?

    BLAGOJEVICH: On the telephone from my campaign office. I spoke to Harry Reid about the Senate seat, enlisting his help. Senator Menendez, the head of the Senate campaign committee for the Democrats, who expressed an interest —

    VAN SUSTEREN: On the phone?

    BLAGOJEVICH: On the telephone, working out what was going to be what I called the best political deal in the political history second to the Louisiana Purchase, because I was going to hold my nose and appoint someone who I thought was working against the people in many ways, but notwithstanding, her father was creating legislation gridlock.

    VAN SUSTEREN: Who else did you talk to?

    BLAGOJEVICH: I spoke to Rahm Emanuel. I spoke to several people.

    VAN SUSTEREN: Who are the sort of the main players in this discussion of the Senate seat? Who did you talk to — I’m trying to figure out who is going to be on tape and who is not.

    BLAGOJEVICH: I can’t tell you that

    VAN SUSTEREN: Who do you remember talking to, to give me some idea?

    BLAGOJEVICH: Again, I spoke to Senator Reid, Senator Menendez, then Congressman Rahm Emanuel days after the election right here from this room, and several other people about potential scenarios on the Senate seat.

    VAN SUSTEREN: A lot of the conversations about the Senate seat maybe some that aren’t on tape but a lot are or should be because they are done by telephone?

    BLAGOJEVICH: Most of the conversations I was engaged in during that six week period had been tape recorded.

    VAN SUSTEREN: You mentioned President Obama. You have filed notice to the court that would you like to subpoena him. And you have enumerated a number of reasons. What is it that you think Senator Obama — President Obama, then-Senate Obama, could offer you at trial on June 3rd that would be helpful to your case?

    BLAGOJEVICH: I think President Obama can help prove my innocence.

    VAN SUSTEREN: How?

    BLAGOJEVICH: Let me say this, before anybody says I’m interested in bringing everybody down with me. That’s completely not the case. I’ve done nothing wrong.

    What I’m interested in is for the whole truth to come out that neither did I do anything wrong, President Obama didn’t do anything wrong, the senators that I talked to didn’t do anything wrong either. And so they should come into court and tell the truth as they know it. Swear on the holy bible as I’m looking forward to do —

    VAN SUSTEREN: I got that, but what is it that — the judge is going to say how is President Obama going to help your case? He is going to ask that flat out to your lawyer. Tell me how.

    BLAGOJEVICH: Again, a lot of evidence and information that I’m prohibited by court order because it is under seal to tell you. So there’s relevance connected to that.

    VAN SUSTEREN: In the pleading your lawyers talked about a conversation in December ’08, a conversation. President Obama called you?

    BLAGOJEVICH: Again, I can’t — because of the court order and me following the law I can’t comment specifically on those telephone conversations. My lawyers filed motions in court. They redacted, as far as I understand, they redacted the substance of those. There was a computer glitch apparently that made some of this stuff unwittingly public — the media found it.

    VAN SUSTEREN: You see that still as part of the seal?

    BLAGOJEVICH: It is still part of seal.

    VAN SUSTEREN: What is the breadth of the gag order? What can you or can’t talk about?

    BLAGOJEVICH: I can’t talk about the evidence that we have and we know that is currently under seal, which is as far as I know everything. I can tell you independently what I recollect.

    VAN SUSTEREN: Can you tell me independently what recollect about the conversation you had with President Obama in December of ’08?

    BLAGOJEVICH: Again, I don’t think I can. I don’t think I should in that particular case. President Obama and I, I can recall independently, spoke at the governor’s event at the Independence Hall in Philadelphia days before I was arrested.

    VAN SUSTEREN: In person?

    BLAGOJEVICH: In person. And a lot of other governors —

    VAN SUSTEREN: Was it about the Senate seat, just generally?

    BLAGOJEVICH: I don’t think I should say what we talked about. It will all eventually —

    VAN SUSTEREN: If it is not about the Senate seat, I have a hard time figuring out why he would be a witness that the court is going to allow you to call.

    The court ought to let you play any tapes that in any way exculpate you or even tend to. They should let you call witnesses that will help you in your defense. The one thing the court won’t do is let you call someone who doesn’t have anything to benefit you.

    BLAGOJEVICH: Again, there’s information and there’s evidence that is under seal. And I’m prohibited by a court order from specifically talking about those things —

    VAN SUSTEREN: Even from what you recollect?

    BLAGOJEVICH: I feel like if I start going into substance of conversations it is a slippery slope and I might inadvertently cross the line.

    VAN SUSTEREN: What is the line? What does the gag order say you can and can’t do?

    BLAGOJEVICH: Again, the evidence that we have access to that we had the chance to review, the taped conversations.

    VAN SUSTEREN: That’s out, you can’t talk about the content of those.

    BLAGOJEVICH: The FBI interviews. The statements of potential witnesses, all those things are not something that would be appropriate for me to comment on.

    Let me also say in the case of President Obama and me, and again, let me be very clear, I know absolutely no wrongdoing that the president was involved in. And I know I was involved in no wrongdoing. But there is a common political support of ours named Tony Rezko who is relevant to both me and President Obama.

    Again he wrote a letter to a federal sentencing judge —

    VAN SUSTEREN: Is Rezko helpful to you at your June 3rd, trial?

    BLAGOJEVICH: I can’t comment about the specifics of the case.

    VAN SUSTEREN: Is he on your witness list?

    BLAGOJEVICH: I’ll leave that for the lawyers to discuss.

    VAN SUSTEREN: The president is not going to appear on some wiretap?

    BLAGOJEVICH: I’m telling you from my reelection I don’t recall talking to President Obama during that period on the telephone.

    (END VIDEOTAPE)