Author: Mackie Jimbo

  • Why Did China Kill ‘Avatar’?

    Google isn’t the only American commodity being driven out of
    China. Avatar,
    James Cameron’s highly successful and critically acclaimed sci-fi epic, will be
    pulled from all 2-D screens in China
    by this weekend, according to Chinese media outlets.

    Although 3-D and IMAX versions of the film will continue,
    the majority of Chinese movie theaters are not equipped with 3-D technology. As
    a result, the movie will be pulled from 1,628 movie screens across the
    country (compared to only 800 3-D and IMAX cinemas). Avatar will be replaced with Confucius, a domestically
    produced biopic about the renowned Chinese philosopher. Why?

    Avatar generated
    record-breaking profits in China,
    earning $76 million in Chinese ticket sales so far. The film’s financial
    success, however, may have led to its demise. Several reports from both the mainland
    and U.S.
    indicate that the government wants to promote and protect the domestic film
    industry. Currently, only 20 films can be imported per year, in order to reduce
    foreign competition. These films can only run for 10 days and are often curtailed
    during a major holiday, giving domestic films a significant market advantage.

    Avatar’s resonance
    with Chinese audiences also may have prompted government intervention. In the
    film, humans attempt to conquer the alien-inhabited world of Pandora, which
    contains a mineral that the Earth desperately needs. Many Chinese citizens see
    a close parallel to their own lives, as urban developments and projects
    such as the Three Gorges Dam force them off their land. Perhaps the government
    is worried that the ensuing violence on-screen may incite violence off-screen
    as well.

    At first glance, the decision to pull Avatar is not exceptional. The film has indeed lapsed its 10-day
    run and a holiday — the Lunar New Year — is approaching. In addition, foreign films often
    contain themes that the government is not fond of. What is exceptional is the
    timing. A week after Google threatened to leave China, the Chinese government shows
    no signs of changing its restrictive censorship policies. I don’t think it is mere
    coincidence that Confucius — a
    state-sanctioned, state-produced movie about one of China’s most beloved and
    patriotic figures — will replace the controversial Avatar. By canning the most successful movie of all time in China, the
    government shows little concern for free markets or its consumers. Ignoring
    Chinese consumer demand for Avatar and
    bait-and-switching it with state propaganda may incite the very criticism that
    the government seeks to avoid.  




    Email this Article
    Add to digg
    Add to Reddit
    Add to Twitter
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to StumbleUpon
    Add to Facebook