Author: Mathew Ingram

  • Citibank Red-faced After Censoring Fabulis

    Social networking startup Fabulis last week suddenly found its bank account locked and scheduled for termination, based on what several Citibank employees told founder and CEO Jason Goldberg was an issue of “objectionable content” on the company’s blog. Although no one from the bank ever mentioned it specifically, Goldberg suspected the sanctions were related to the fact that Fabulis is a social network and lifestyle site aimed at gay men. In a blog post, he says Citibank confirmed to him that the site was blocked because a Citibank staffer said it contained porn (which even a cursory check of the site shows that it clearly doesn’t). The bank now says it has “updated and clarified its procedures” to prevent such issues from occurring in the future. Goldberg says:

    It was clearly a mistake on the bank’s part — one which highlights the prevailing subtle forms of homophobia and/or lack of understanding we see periodically from some big corporations. Someone there made a misguided decision in reviewing our content and the systems and policies of the bank allowed it to go through.

    According to a statement released by Citibank, the institution conducts regular “due diligence” on its business accounts, and says it reserves the right to “decline or suspend an account if we find illegal or discriminatory content, or if the site involves gambling or pornography.” However, it adds that as a result of certain (unnamed) incidents, “we have made it clearer to our bankers what the due diligence process entails [and] beyond that specific due diligence…we do not monitor or evaluate our customers’ web content.”

    As far as I’m concerned, the part of the Fabulis incident that makes Citibank look the worst isn’t the blocking or threatened termination of the startup’s account, although that is pretty bad — it’s the repeated attempts to sweep the issue under the carpet and/or change the bank’s story as it was happening. At first, the bank tried to pretend that the affair was simply a “misunderstanding,” and blamed it on some missing documentation. Only after Goldberg refused the initial apology and continued to blog and post to Twitter about it did the bank finally admit that it had made a mistake and apologize.

    Here’s a quick tip, guys: When something like this breaks loose in the blogosphere or on Twitter, your best option is to get out in front of it, not to pretend it didn’t happen.

    Post and thumnail photos courtesy of Flickr user autumn_bliss

  • The Few, the Brave — the Army iPhone App

    If you work for the U.S. Army and spend all your spare time hacking the iPhone and Android or fooling around with HTML5, this is a contest for you: The Army’s Chief Information Office is launching a competition aimed at mobile and web apps, with cash awards totaling $30,000 and the chance to get your application the military seal of approval. The contest is a joint venture with iStrategyLabs, and is based on that company’s successful Apps For Democracy project, which was a joint venture with the Washington, D.C.’s Office of the CTO in 2008.

    iStrategyLabs founder and CEO Peter Corbett describes on the company’s blog how the contest will work. It starts with a press conference and media (and blogger) roundtable on March 3 at the Pentagon with Lieutenant General Jeffery Sorenson (the Army’s chief information officer) and runs until May 15th. A total of 100 teams will be selected to compete for one or more of 40 cash awards totaling $30,000. Awards will be announced in June, with public demonstrations. The competition comes with a software repository (forge.mil), a cloud-based development sandbox, a collaboration space designed around an Apps for the Army group on MilBook (the Army’s version of Facebook) and a Twitter hashtag: #apps4army.

    Corbett says the idea for the project came from O’Reilly Media founder and CEO Tim O’Reilly, who said on Twitter after announcing the competition that he had hoped to get the rest of the U.S. military involved as well, but wound up only getting the Army on board. The Army has been making some significant strides in the areas of social media over the past year or two, including the launch of CIO Sorenson’s Twitter account, which the lieutenant-general posts to himself (in contrast to many other government departments). It also recently released a surprisingly forward-thinking social media policy.

    Lt.-Gen. Sorenson said in a statement released by the Army today that “We’re building a culture of collaboration among our Army community to encourage smarter, better and faster technical solutions to meet operational needs. Soldiers and Army civilians will be creating new mobile and web applications of value for their peers — tools that enhance warfighting effectiveness and business productivity today. And we’re rewarding their innovation with recognition and cash.” Or, as Craigslist founder Craig Newmark described it in a blog post: “A lot of people in the Army know stuff and want to serve more effectively.” Well said, Craig.

    Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    The App Developers’ Guide to Choosing a Mobile Platform

    Post photo courtesy of iStrategyLabs, thumbnail photo courtesy of Flickr user Dunechaser

  • News Has “Become a Social Experience”: Pew

    Do you catch up on the news in multiple ways during a typical day — on a mobile phone, on the web, via a newspaper — and get that news from more than one place (major news portal, TV broadcast channel)? And do you like to share that news through social networks and comment on it? Then you are today’s archetypal news consumer, according to a new study by the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life and the Project for Excellence in Journalism. The study shows that an overwhelming majority of Americans — more than 90 percent — use multiple platforms to get their daily news, that the days of loyalty to a specific news outlet or brand are gone and that news has “become a social experience.”

    The study (which is based on a national telephone survey of 2,259 adults ages 18 and older), also found that the Internet has taken over from newspapers as the most popular source of news. Overall, the Internet came third, behind local and national television. The report paints a picture of a news consumer who is platform-agnostic and moves easily between online and offline sources. “Americans have become news grazers both on and offline,” Amy Mitchell, deputy director of the Pew Research Center’s Project for Excellence in Journalism, was quoted as saying. Among the study’s findings:

    • Six in ten of those surveyed (59 percent) get news from a combination of online and offline sources on a typical day.
    • Six in ten American adults (61 percent) get news online on a typical day, and 71 percent of Americans get news online at least occasionally.
    • 33 percent of cell phone owners now access news on the devices.
    • The majority of online news consumers (57 percent) routinely rely on just two to five web sites for their news, and only 35 percent have a favorite.
    • Portal web sites like Google News, AOL and Topix are the most commonly used online news sources, visited by over half of online news users (56 percent) on a typical day.

    Another key finding of the report is that news has become a social experience for many consumers, who not only share the news they find with their friends through social networks such as Twitter and Facebook, but are also increasingly using such tools to find their news in the first place. And once they find it, they want to talk about it and become involved in it. A statement released along with the study says:

    The rise of social media like social networking sites and blogs has helped the news become a social experience for consumers; people use their social networks and social networking technology to filter, assess, and react to news. They also use traditional email and other tools to swap stories and comment on them.

    Kristen Purcell, associate director for research at the Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, said that “we see new segments of avid news consumers built around those who have set up news alerts and those who are eager to be part of the news-creation and news-commentary environment.” Overall, the study found that consumers’ relationship to the news is “becoming portable, personalized, and participatory.” In particular it found that:

    • 28 percent of Internet users have customized their home page to include news from sources and on topics that particularly interest them.
    • 37 percent of Internet users have contributed to the creation of news, commented about it, or disseminated it via postings on social media sites like Facebook or Twitter.
    • Among those who get news online, 75 percent get it forwarded through email or posts on social networking sites and 52 percent share links to news with others via those means.

    While the Pew Report doesn’t contain any earth-shattering news about what the state of online media looks like right now, it confirms what anyone who has been paying attention to the industry — or even to the behavior of their friends and relatives — instinctively knows: news consumption has become mobile, cross-platform and social. If you are a media outlet but aren’t taking advantage of all of these features, and rethinking how they affect your business, then you’e missing the boat.

    Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Are Sponsored Apps the Key for Traditional Media in Mobile?

    Post and thumbnail images courtesy of Flickr user Zarko Drincic

  • Google Launches User-Generated Street View

    Although it continues to face criticism from European privacy authorities about Street View, that hasn’t stopped Google from adding features to the service. The latest to launch is a kind of user-generated layer to Street View that uses photos uploaded by individuals to create a pseudo-3D panorama of a specific spot. Although there aren’t going to be enough user photos to do this for every site or building, it’s an additional way to get different perspectives on popular landmarks.

    If the new feature sounds familiar, that’s probably because it is very similar to a photo feature launched by Microsoft in 2008 called Photosynth, which also takes user-submitted photos of famous sites that have been shot from all different angles and generates a 3D panorama from them. The main difference between the two is that Photosynth requires Silverlight — Microsoft’s competitor to Flash — which only runs on Windows (and Intel-based Macs). Although Google’s new feature doesn’t have a cool name like Photosynth (they just call it “navigating through user photos in Street View,” it offers the same basic functionality, and is available to anyone with Flash).

    Google started incorporating user photos into the Street View part of Google Maps last year. It started with photos from Google-owned photo service Panoramio (which has been an option within Google Maps for some time) and more recently added support for Flickr photos as well. But all that did was show you specific photos (if they were geo-tagged properly) when you looked at a location in the regular Google Maps view. With the new feature, which is described in a video embedded below, the photos are superimposed on a Google Street View of the location, and you can easily switch from one to the other.

    The benefits of this are obvious when you take a browse through one of the locations that Google has implemented the feature for: the Plaza Orologio in Prague. Street View gives you a view of the street taken from the Google car, but it is static — when you click into the user photos of the plaza, you can easily move from one view of the buildings to another, seeing them from different angles and perspectives, and you can even zoom in on details of the various buildings. The pictures appear in a row superimposed on the street view, so you can click to advance from one to the next, or there are also navigational controls built into the page as well. Another example is the Sagrada Familia in Barcelona.

  • On Google, Italy and the Future of Media

    Many electrons have been spilled in response to the recent Italian court decision that found several Google executives guilty of privacy violations, after a video was uploaded to Google Video that showed an autistic boy being tormented by bullies. The vast majority of those writing about the decision — including Google itself, in a surprisingly heated blog post — rejected the court’s ruling as deluded, short-sighted, puritanical, misguided and just generally stupid and evil. The Wall Street Journal called it “madness,” and suggested it was “crazy, even for Italy,” while the Inquirer called it “a blow against common sense and Internet freedom.” Danny O’Brien of the Electronic Frontier Foundation called it “a threat to the Internet,” and the National Post said it suggested that “Fascism is alive and well.”

    There have been a couple of dissenters from this consensus view, however: editor and SEO consultant Malcom Coles argued that the ruling was entirely justified, and that Google should accept its responsibilities to monitor content that is uploaded through its services, because it “runs a publishing platform” and “we hold companies responsible for what they publish or facilitate the publishing of.” Tom Foremski, who runs Silicon Valley Watcher, also argued that the decision was fair, and that Google should be expected to do a better job of moderating the content it hosts because it is “a media company.”

    So is Google a media company? Or is it simply a form of Internet service provider, and therefore not directly responsible for the content it hosts? Such a distinction is crucial to the Italian decision. Google argued that the ruling contradicts a European Union directive that gives service providers safe harbor from liability for content they host (the U.S. has Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which gives providers of electronic services so-called “safe harbor” for content). But prosecutors argued that because Google handled user data — and used content to generate advertising revenue — it was a content provider, not a service provider, and therefore liable.

    The question of whether Google is a media company or not, and if so how it should be treated, has been vexing observers for years now. Its primary business might be search and search-related ads and marketing, but with YouTube and Blogger and Buzz and other services in its stable, it’s also part content provider. In his blog post, Tom Foremski says:

    Google is a media company — it publishes pages of content with advertising around it. Just like a newspaper. What’s not a media company about that? Google is not a technology company…Google is a technology-enabled media company. Therefore, it will come under similar regulations that apply to media companies.

    The problem with that philosophy, however, is that not even traditional media companies can keep up with the volume of “user-generated content” they wind up either hosting or publishing (depending on your perspective). To take just one example, at the newspaper where I used to work, the Globe and Mail — which is relatively small compared to many of its U.S. counterparts — we got upwards of 8,000 reader comments every day. The staff did their best to moderate the obviously libelous and offensive ones, but it was like trying to mop up the ocean with a handful of paper towels. Should the Globe be liable for all of those comments? The law in Canada is unclear, although in the U.S. web site publishers are protected in the same way that Google is.

    The benefit from those protections (which have been tested in a number of cases, including one involving Amazon) is that web sites can post information and host discussion forums and blogs and comments without being chilled by the prospect of a multimillion-dollar lawsuit or jail time for breach of some nuance of privacy or libel law. The tradeoff is simple: In return for the freedom to do this, which is seen (at least in the U.S.) as a social good despite the potential for bad behavior and illegal content, providers of services like Google agree to remove content when there is a complaint (as was done in this case). Requiring any other approach would be so unwieldy as to make such services virtually non-existent. As Google lawyer Matt Sucherman notes in his blog post in response to the Italian decision:

    It attacks the very principles of freedom on which the Internet is built…[If] sites like Blogger, YouTube and indeed every social network and any community bulletin board, are held responsible for vetting every single piece of content that is uploaded to them — every piece of text, every photo, every file, every video — then the Web as we know it will cease to exist, and many of the economic, social, political and technological benefits it brings could disappear.

    There’s ample reason to believe that Google will be successful on appeal, and that Italy’s decision is almost certainly an aberration. And it’s possible that the case only arose because Italian Prime Minister Silivio Berlusconi sees Google and its services as a threat to his interests, since he controls the leading commercial broadcaster (as well as a number of newspapers and other assets) and also has considerable influence over the state broadcaster. But the principle is still an important one: If Google — or any other media company, for that matter — is held to the kind of standards that the Italian court is trying to impose, we will almost certainly lose a core element of what makes the web such a powerful force for freedom of thought, commentary and inquiry.

    Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Post and thumbnail photos courtesy of Flickr user Stitch and iStockphoto.

  • Use Social Media to Track the Chilean Earthquake

    As with the earthquake in Haiti, social-media tools such as Twitter and other web-based resources have been a key source of information about the disaster, helping family members find out about their loved ones as well as letting authorities know where there are problems that need to be dealt with. We’ve collected some of the places you can look for further data and in-person reports, as well as ways of helping Chile recover from the quake. If you have any other resources you think people could use, please post them in the comments or email them to [email protected].

    • Twitter List: As it did during the Haiti earthquake, The New York Times has collected some Twitter accounts with information about what is going on in Chile.
    • Ben Casnocha: The entrepreneur and author has been tweeting details about the earthquake and its aftermath
    • Twitpic: People have been uploading images of the devastation in and around Concepcion, some of which have been collected by The Huffington Post.
    • Ushahidi: A site designed to act as a central clearinghouse for information about disasters such as the Chilean earthquake.
    • Livestream: A live video feed from Chilean TV via the Livestream service.
    • Person Finder: A Chilean version of a tool that Google originally created to help during the Haiti earthquake.
    • Map Maker: Google has also opened up the use of its mapping database for use by aid organizations, and people can help via the Chile Update Page. Google has a page set up with other resources, including the ability to click and donate to Unicef and other charities from the page.

    Thumbnail photos courtesy of Twitpic, post photo courtesy of Google.

  • EU Wants Google Street View Curbed

    European regulators, in the latest chapter of an ongoing privacy battle with Google, have told the company that it needs to warn people when its Street View cameras are going to be filming them, and to shorten the length of time that it keeps the images generated by the service. The Associated Press says it obtained a letter the EU sent to Google informing the company of the need to make these changes, but the search company is apparently resisting.

    In response to the EU’s request to inform people about when the Street View car is going to be filming them, Google said it already does this by posting the details on its web site. According to a Dow Jones report, however, the letter specifically said that Google should notify cities and towns by “appropriate announcements in the national, regional and or local press.” The regulatory body also had an issue with the fact that Google keeps unblurred photos from Street View on its servers for 12 months, although only blurred images are available to the public (the search company agreed to blur faces, license plates and other personal items after previous privacy complaints).

    In a statement that was seen by Bloomberg News, however, Google lawyer Peter Fleischer responded by saying:

    The need to retain the unblurred images is legitimate and justified — to ensure the quality and accuracy of our maps, to improve our ability to rectify mistakes in blurring, as well as to use the data we have collected to build better maps products for our users.

    Google has faced repeated opposition to Street View in a number of countries. Last year, Greece blocked the company’s plans to take photos of its streets until it could come up with more privacy safeguards, and Google also recently acceded to demands from the German government that it erase photos of faces, house numbers, license plates and shots of any people who have said they don’t want to appear on the service. Europe has been far more vigilant in taking steps to protect its residents’ privacy from services such as Google’s, although Canada also took steps to get Google to make changes to its service before it was launched last year.

    The EU letter also reportedly said that Google should appoint a representative in each European country to ensure that Street View is in compliance with that country’s specific privacy laws. The requests come from the Article 29 Data Protection Working Party, a group of regulators composed of representatives from all the EU’s member countries. News of the EU demands comes just days after several senior Google executives were convicted by an Italian court of violating privacy laws by allowing a video to be uploaded that showed a mentally disabled child being tormented by bullies.

    Related content from GigaOm Pro (sub req’d):

    As Cloud Computing Goes International, Whose Laws Matter?

  • LinkTV Building a YouTube for Social Change

    LinkTV, a non-profit satellite TV channel that specializes in news and documentaries about global change and the developing world, is launching a site called ViewChange.org, which it says will be a one-stop portal “to help raise awareness of global development issues.” The project, which is being funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, was previewed on Wednesday with a video address from actor and UN ambassador Danny Glover (a LinkTV board member), which is embedded below. LinkTV, which was founded in 1999 by TV veteran and documentary producer Kim Spencer, says it will be using “the latest semantic tools” to create a digital media hub with videos, news articles, opinion and commentary, along with links that will allow readers and viewers to get involved in global development.

    ViewChange, which LinkTV said will launch this summer, is being designed by Method, the firm behind sites such as Fancast and TED. And it will use a couple of interesting open-source information tools to pull together content, including Freebase — a structured data platform from Metaweb Technologies — and OpenCalais, a semantic engine developed by Thomson Reuters that extracts keywords and other data from text. LinkTV, which claims to be the largest independent TV broadcaster in the U.S. with a reach of 47 million homes through the DirectTV and DISH networks, in outlining its mission in a statement, said:

    With access to a rapidly evolving database of structured content, visitors will be able to more effectively engage with policymakers to encourage support for development efforts.

    The site’s “semantic video player,” which will include related content and links, will be shared with other sites (LinkTV also has a YouTube channel as well as a Vimeo channel), and ViewChange.org will have an open application programming interface (API) that will allow other sites to create applications and pages that include ViewChange.org content. The site’s press release quotes Internet Archive founder Brewster Kahle saying “It’s great to see a not-for-profit initiative leading the charge on next-generation Web technology.”

    Mark Suzman, director of Global Development Policy and Advocacy at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, said that “innovative investments in international development are helping people in the developing world lift themselves out of hunger and poverty, and lead healthy, productive lives,” and that ViewChange would help to “showcase inspirational stories of people who have benefited from these investments, showing that these programs are delivering real results by giving them the tools to change their lives for the better, and that progress is possible on a large
    scale.”

    Related content from GigaOm Pro (sub req’d):

    NewNet Winners and Losers of 2009

    Post and thumbnail photos courtesy of Flickr user azrainman

  • PayPal Wants to Hitch Its Wagon to the Social Train

    eBay CEO John Donahoe told a Goldman Sachs technology conference today that the company’s PayPal subsidiary wants to become the de facto payment engine for social media, the Wall Street Journal reports. “We want to be the platform on which some of these social-media applications get built,” he told the attendees, referring to Twitpay — a service that allows users to send payments via Twitter and was recently acquired (after failing to gain much traction) — as an example. PayPal has been trying to open itself up to developers in order to allow them to build payment more easily into their services and software, to that end launching a developers conference to talk about its open platform several months ago. And it has had some success attracting social networks, including Facebook, which said last week that it will use PayPal for transactions for virtual goods on the site.

    Donahoe effectively pitched his service as the only game in town for large-scale social payments, saying:

    The risk and fraud capabilities you need, the anti-money laundering…the ability to do it cross-border are very different things than just providing a virtual currency.

    Facebook confirmed when it announced the PayPal deal that it was the complications of multiple currencies and international transactions that led it to choose the eBay unit as a partner, since 70 percent of its users live outside the U.S. It’s worth noting, however, that PayPal has had its own difficulties with international payments, as a recent ban on transfers to India illustrates. Donahoe also told the conference that he sees a growing demand for payments involving digital goods, and that PayPal has been talking to companies including Zynga, the leading maker of Facebook-based social games.

    I see that trend, particularly in virtual goods, continuing. PayPal is well positioned to be the foundation for many of these digital goods.

    The Facebook arrangement makes PayPal the engine behind Facebook Credits, an in-network payment scheme that the social network is pushing game makers and others to use, which gives Facebook 30 percent of the proceeds from each transaction. According to one analyst, such payments could become a $100 million business.

    PayPal still has a lot of work to do before it can become the engine behind every social network and social media service, however. As Kevin Kelleher pointed out recently, the service is barely even present on mobile devices, despite the fact that the iPhone and other smartphones have been a dominant market force in social networking for well over a year now. Instead, much of the recent buzz has been around Square, the hot new mobile payment gizmo created by Twitter co-founder Jack Dorsey. As entrepreneur Patricia Handschiegel noted in a blog post about Donahoe’s pitch to Goldman Sachs, PayPal has to start doing some innovating of its own, instead of just hoping to hitch its wagon to everyone else’s innovations.

    Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Could Activist-Style Micropayments Be a Real-time Ad Model?

    Post and thumbnail photos courtesy of Flickr user cindy47452

  • UPDATED: Did Citibank Block a Startup for Gay Content?

    Updated: Fabulis, a new venture-backed startup from Jason Goldberg — founder of socialmedian.com and Jobster — says that its bank account was recently blocked by Citibank, without any notice from the bank. According to a phone conversation with someone from the bank, the block occurred because of “objectionable content” on the startup’s blog. There were no details on what the content was, but could it have something to do with the fact that Fabulis is a social network and lifestyle service that is aimed at gay men? Goldberg describes it in a blog post (hat tip to TechCrunch for noticing this first, along with Feedjit CEO Mark Maunder):

    In a bit of strange and disturbing news, fabulis discovered today that someone(s) at Citibank had decided arbitrarily to block fabulis’ bank account due to what was described to us on the phone as “objectionable content” on our blog. In fact, the account — it turns out — was blocked a few days ago without anyone letting us know about it by phone or email.

    As Goldberg notes, there are at least two issues here, and possibly three: one is that Citibank appears to be blocking or putting a hold on bank accounts because of content on a company’s blog — and doing so apparently without providing any notice to the company itself. Since when do banks review the blogs of companies that have accounts with them, and determine whether to give them access to their funds based on what they find there? The other issue is that the bank appears to have done this solely because there was gay content on the Fabulis blog (which doesn’t seem to have anything else on it that might fit under the term “objectionable content”).

    In a comment on a post at Hacker News, Goldberg says that he spent three hours on the phone trying to sort the issue out, and that while he doesn’t think Citibank is a homophobic institution, he does think that “some compliance officer is a moron who made a really stupid decision.” The Fabulis founder also points out in his blog post that Fabulis isn’t exactly some shady red-light web site, but a well-funded startup backed by the Washington Post, Mayfield Fund’s Allen Morgan and Burson-Marsteller’s Don Baer. Goldberg, who was a co-founder of Jobster, also started and ran socialmedian.com, which was sold to Xing in 2008. For more on Fabulis, check out the site’s Q&A with Goldberg here.

    The Fabulis founder says that a Citibank employee promised to review the site today, and that “if we do not get a good response to this on Thursday we are moving our bank account to a bank that respects and appreciates our business.” Goldberg is right to be upset if Citibank has in fact blocked his company’s account because of some unspecified content on the Fabulis blog. Could it be some kind of “cataloguing error,” as Amazon explained when gay-themed books all of a sudden disappeared from its index last year?

    Update:

    In a new blog post, Goldberg says that he spoke with a Citibank employee about the issue, and was told that the bank had decided to terminate the startup’s account because the “content was not in compliance with Citibank’s standard policies.” The Fabulis founder says that the bank’s management promised to review the situation today, but added that “regardless of Citi’s response we have decided we’re taking our banking elsewhere.”

    We’ve contacted Citibank and will let you know if and when we get a response.

    Update 2:

    A new update on the Fabulis blog says a Citibank representative has called and apologized. According to Goldberg, the bank spokesperson said that “all 3 of the citibank individuals who over the past 24 hours each individually claimed that fabulis’ account was to be terminated for compliance issues around the content of our site, were all wrong to have said what they said.”

    Update 3:

    Citibank emailed this statement:

    Citibank sincerely apologizes to Mr. Goldberg for this misunderstanding. This situation had nothing to do with the content of his web site and any comments by our staff to the contrary were incorrect; we are reviewing what happened. This was a technical issue about missing documentation that is required for new business accounts. Once we resolved the situation, we unblocked the account immediately. Mr. Goldberg is a valued customer and we appreciate his business. Also, Citi is strongly committed to diversity, including support for the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender community, and other organizations promoting diversity. In fact, this week Citi has announced the financing for the True Colors Residence, a housing facility for homeless GLBT youth in New York City.

    Update 4:

    Citibank may have thought that an apology would make its Fabulis problem go away, but they were mistaken. Jason Goldberg wrote a follow-up blog post called “Inside the Citi circus,” about how unsatisfactory Citibank’s apology was, and giving even more details about how various employees of the bank had referred to objectionable content on the site — at one point even suggesting that he actually come down to the branch to view the specific content — and how this clearly was not just some kind of “misunderstanding” over some missing documentation. In response, he got a further apology from the bank, which he also posted, saying it was much more sincere and that he had accepted it in good faith.

    A couple of things seem fairly clear from this whole episode: 1) Citibank got a substantial amount of bad publicity, which it will probably get over, and 2) there are probably a lot of people at the bank who will wish that they had never heard of Jason Goldberg or his website before this week ends.

    Post and thumbnail photos courtesy of Bob.Fornal

  • Google’s Antitrust Woes Are Just Beginning

    There was more than a tinge of schadenfreude in the reports that emerged Wednesday about an antitrust investigation the European Union had allegedly opened into Google’s practices on that continent. Finally, the company that dared to flaunt its “don’t be evil” slogan — while amassing an almost unprecedented amount of market power on the web — would be held accountable, in what looked like an almost exact copy of the antitrust investigations that Microsoft was subjected to in the late 1990s. Unfortunately for all those who cheered the news, the EU has released a statement saying it has not opened an investigation into Google, preliminary or otherwise, despite what the Wall Street Journal and others might want to think. The statement said:

    The Commission can confirm that it has received three complaints against Google which it is examining. The Commission has not opened a formal investigation for the time being. As is usual when the Commission receives complaints, it informed Google earlier this month and asked the company to comment on the allegations.

    Although the WSJ and others referred explicitly to Google disclosing news of a preliminary inquiry, the company never actually used those terms in its blog post on the issue. Much like the EU statement, Google said simply that several complaints had been lodged with the European Union, and that it had been asked to respond. It also suggested that Microsoft was at least tangentially involved in bringing the complaints forward, since one company that registered a complaint — a vertical search engine called Foundem (whose complaint has been criticized by some as naive) — is a member of an industry body funded in part by the software behemoth, and another only started complaining about Google’s practices (according to Google) after being acquired by Microsoft.

    The bigger question, of course, is whether Google deserves to be the subject of an antitrust investigation — whether in the European Union or anywhere else — and the uncomfortable answer is that it probably does (Google has also been more than happy to egg regulators on when Microsoft was the target). That’s not to say the company should be subjected to a five-year-long saga of drawn-out court challenges and posturing by federal authorities and regulators, the way Microsoft was. It’s simply a recognition of the fact that Google is a very different company now than it was even three or four years ago. Its market power is almost unparalleled, particularly in search-related advertising, which is to the web economy what steam power was to the industrial revolution.

    Like it or not, that kind of power has consequences, and one of those consequences is that other companies and critics will allege all kinds of anti-competitive behavior is going on behind the scenes, including the rigging of search results. One of Google’s problems is that it keeps the details of its PageRank and other algorithms so secret that it’s difficult to disprove these kinds of allegations. In effect, its response to such criticisms is to say “We’re not doing that — trust us.” That might have been fine when Google was a tiny startup taking on the big web giants. Now it is one of those giants itself, with tens of thousands of employees and all the corporate headaches that come with it, and one of those headaches is having to answer to government regulators (TechCrunch had a good interview last year about Google and antitrust with Gary Reback, an antitrust lawyer who spearheaded the push to break Microsoft up in the 1990s).

    So is Google entering its Microsoft period? Maybe. But it could be entering its Yahoo period or its AOL period, both of which would be much worse.

    Related content from GigaOm Pro (sub. req’d):

    As Cloud Computing Goes International, Whose Laws Matter?

    Post and thumbnail photos courtesy of Flickr user BFLV

  • Twitter Backtracking on Advertising Launch?

    As we mentioned in a post yesterday, a Twitter executive suggested at a recent advertising industry conference that the company would soon be rolling out an official advertising platform, likely within the next month or so. Anamitra Banerji, head of product management and monetization at Twitter, made the comments in response to a question from a panel moderator at the IAB Annual Leadership Meeting, according to a story in Media Post. A source in the media industry also told us that Twitter was planning to launch its ad platform at SXSW in early March, and was working with some major media partners as well as some lesser-known ones.

    Banerji now seems to be backtracking somewhat on his comments, however, or at least the timing that was referred to. In the Media Post story, writer Laurie Sullivan — who was in attendance at the advertising conference — described how moderator Seth Goldstein of socialmedia.com asked the Twitter executive whether the company would “likely in the next month or so offer Twitter owned and operated ads,” to which Banerji replied, “That’s right.” In a Twitter conversation with TechCrunch writer Erick Schonfeld this morning, however, Banerji said (somewhat cryptically) that:

    “Speculation = timing, imminence, details. Truth = thinking, planning, eventuality.”

    The Twitter executive also noted that he had told the reporter “explicitly that [the] timing statement was completely inaccurate,” and pointed to a blog post from Seth Goldstein referring to the panel. In that post, Goldstein apologized to Twitter COO Dick Costolo, Banerji “and the rest of the team at Twitter for suggesting that I knew any more than I actually do.” He went on to say that he simply meant to refer to a statement from Costolo in November about advertising being in the works, and that: “It is unfortunate that our casual conversation about potential Twitter ad directions has been taken out of context to become ‘news’ when there really isn’t any.”

    So what do we know for sure? That Twitter is working on rolling out an advertising platform. What we don’t know is the exact timing of that rollout, or what form it will take. Will the ads be simple 140-character tweets inserted into your stream, or will they be sponsored tweets similar to what Ad.ly and others offer? Will users be able to block them entirely or fine-tune which ones they see? Will advertising be open to anyone, or just major partners? For what it’s worth, the media industry source who spoke to us about Twitter’s plans for South by Southwest — which the source emphasized were tentative and not final — said that the company had been talking with some major and minor media industry partners and had been inviting them to attend the conference.

    And when it comes right down to it, Twitter has been talking about launching an ad platform for almost six months now — what are they waiting for? They should just launch the darn thing and get on with making some money. If you happen to know anything about Twitter’s advertising plans, feel free to contact me at mathew at gigaom dot com or DM me on Twitter at @mathewi, or post a comment with the info.

    Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    How Human Users Are Holding Twitter Back

    Post and thumbnail photos courtesy of Flickr user Daveness_98

  • Scribd Goes Mobile With Long-tail Books

    Scribd, the document-hosting service that calls itself “the largest social publishing company in the world,” has launched a series of mobile services and features for sending books and other documents to any portable device, including a set of open APIs, and according to CEO Trip Adler, the company plans to launch mobile apps for the iPhone, Android and iPad in the next few months. He also said that Scribd, which has about 50 million unique visitors a month, will soon have published more books than the entire U.S. publishing industry did last year.

    “We’ve spent the last few years building a repository of 10 million documents,” Adler said in an interview in advance of the launch. “Now we’re launching a way to really easily read these documents on any mobile device. So whether it’s a PowerPoint presentation or a book or a homework project, you can now send that to any mobile device and read it there.” One of the problems with the e-reader market, he says, is that “people don’t really know what to buy, or what to read on them — with these new services, as long as it’s on Scribd you know that you can read it on any device.”

    Scribd’s launch involves three separate products:

    • A “send-to-device” option that will now appear at the top of every document the service hosts, which pulls up a list of all the devices Scribd can send to, including the Kindle, iPhone, Sony Reader, etc.
    • The Scribd Open Platform for E-Readers (SOPED), a development platform and set of application programming interfaces that companies can use to integrate with Scribd’s mobile services.
    • A series of mobile apps for the iPhone, Android, Kindle, iPad and other portable devices that make it easier to send and receive Scribd documents and books.

    Adler told me that Scribd briefly thought about coming out with its own e-reading device, but “only for about a minute. It didn’t really make sense, because we’re a web software company, not a hardware company. So we decided to embrace as many different devices as we could.” Through a variety of different protocols — email, text messaging, etc. — the new “send-to-device” service supports the Kindle, the Nook, the iPhone, the Android, Windows Mobile devices, the BlackBerry, the Palm, the Onyx, the JetBook, the EZReader, the IRex and the Cool-ER. Adler said support for other devices will be coming soon.

    In contrast to companies like Apple and Amazon, which are concentrating on signing deals with major publishers for established authors, Adler said that Scribd focuses on what the company calls “the long tail of content.” That means anything from a student’s PhD thesis or a PowerPoint presentation to a self-published children’s story or a cookbook. “We specialize in all kinds of material that isn’t being published by traditional publishers,” he said. “About 95 percent of the content on Scribd is free.”

    That said, Scribd spokesperson Michelle Laird noted that the company is also working with major publishers such as Simon & Schuster and Random House. Although some publishers have criticized the company in the past for hosting copyright-infringing copies of their works, Adler says that Scribd has “made tremendous progress with our copyright management system.” Laird noted that Wiley & Sons — publishers of the popular “Dummies” series of self-help technical books — has also agreed to put some of its content on Scribd, after being satisfied by the company that it would be protected.

    Adler said that the number of books published through Scribd is “doubling every six months or so,” and that soon the company will have published more books than the entire U.S. publishing industry did last year, a number he estimated at about 300,000. The Scribd CEO also said that he isn’t concerned about competitor DocStoc’s recent launch of an online store for selling documents. “Jason at DocStoc has been saying that we’re just a book publisher, but we’re really not,” he said. “We host all kinds of documents.”

    Laird noted that while DocStoc requires those who sell through its store to be approved, Scribd “allows anyone to sell in our store.” Among the document services that Scribd has deals with, she said that ProQuest provides hundreds of thousands of graduate-level theses that students can read and use to study for a graduate degree. The service also has a branded, embeddable reader that is used by publications such as the New York Times to host documents related to new stories.

    Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub. req’d):

    The Price of E-Book Progress

    Thumbnail photo courtesy of Flickr user Here’s Kate

  • DocStoc Launches Online Document Store

    DocStoc, the cloud-based document-hosting service, has launched an iTunes-style online store and related selling features that allow any individual or corporate user to sell documents either through the DocStoc site or via the service’s embedded document viewer. Founder and CEO Jason Nazar said in an interview in advance of the launch that the company intends to become “the premier online marketplace for small businesses, entrepreneurs and professionals.”

    Nazar said that the new Docstore Marketplace will allow professional users such as single-practice or small-practice lawyers, accountants and real estate brokers to monetize the documents that they create for their businesses, such as loan or financing agreements, financial statements, mortgage papers and so on. Members can embed a DocStoc viewer in their sites with a “buy” button that takes a user directly to the marketplace, and DocStoc will also be featuring popular documents in its store.

    Scribd, another online document-hosting service that allows users to embed documents in their site, launched a similar online store for documents last year, but the DocStoc CEO says that he doesn’t really see the two as competitors. “Yes and no,” he said. “They are similar services, but we have very different businesses. They are focusing on writers, fiction and so on, while we’re very focused on small business and entrepreneurs.” DocStoc has created a library of premium business documents, he said, including partnership agreements, eviction notices, sales plans and so on.

    Nazar said that over the past four months the company has signed a number of partnerships with document creation services such as LegalZoom to offer their pre-packaged legal documents through the DocStoc embedded viewer and online store. “We’ve seen thousands of purchases in that time,” he said, with an average purchase price of $20. Members choose the price for their documents, and users can store their credit card numbers with DocStoc to allow one-click purchasing.

    As part of the DocStoc service, for the first two months that a document is on sale, the creator keeps 100 percent of the revenue from the item, Nazar said, and then the company and the creator split the sales revenue 50-50. There are no additional fees or charges, he added. DocStoc also provides an analytics dashboard for each member that shows all of the purchases of a document, and allows users to easily modify pricing or change the terms that apply to a download. Members can choose how much of a document a reader can see before they have to buy.

    DocStoc, which launched in 2007, is “the largest online repository in the world for official documents,” the CEO said, and now hosts over 13 million documents and gets a million downloads a month. He said the site has seen its traffic climb from just 3 million unique visitors a month last year to more than 20 million uniques a month. Nazar added that the service, which raised $3.25 million in a Series B financing from Rustic Canyon Partners in 2008, is profitable. “We’ve reached a critical mass, with millions of users coming to our site looking for professional documents,” he said. “And this is the next logical step in extending that.”

    Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Delivering Content In the Cloud

    Thumbnail photo courtesy of Flickr user Tim Morgan

  • Crowdfunding Site Sellaband Is Bankrupt

    Sellaband, the “crowdfunding” site for musicians, is bankrupt, according to one of its co-founders and a minority investor in the company, Pim Betist. He told a Dutch newspaper that the service, which allowed members to invest in artists by buying shares in future recordings, “made some bad choices” and is now out of money. Betist, who left Sellaband to start a new venture called AfricaUnlimited, said that too much money was spent on the production and shipping of compact discs for the artists represented by the service. Betist also told the newspaper that Sellaband had no quality control on the artists it allowed to raise money through the service.

    A Dutch court has apparently approved the company’s bankruptcy filing, according to a report by The Next Web. Members of the site have been discussing the bankruptcy and its implications on a number of message boards, including one maintained by Sellaband itself on the Get Satisfaction support site. While an artist was raising funds to pay for recording a CD, the service kept those funds in an escrow account and retained the interest on the donations. It’s not clear what will happen to those funds now.

    Sellaband was founded in 2006 and in 2008 raised $5 million from Prime Technology Ventures. It also did a sales and marketing deal with Amazon in 2007 to give its artists additional profile. The site (which currently says it’s “down for maintenance”) pitched itself as an alternative to the major record labels, by allowing any artist to appeal to members for funding. Once an artist had raised $50,000 through the sale of “parts” or shares, the service would help find a recording studio, producer, etc. to help with the production of the CD. Members who donated would get a copy of the CD and other benefits.

    A similar crowdfunding site called Kickstarter launched last year, backed in part by Andy Baio of Waxy.org, founder of the event-planning site Upcoming (which was sold to Yahoo in 2005). Unlike Sellaband, however, Kickstarter is designed to allow artists and entrepreneurs of all kinds to raise money for a variety of projects or businesses, Baio explained in a blog post after the launch.

  • UPDATED: Twitter to Launch Ad Platform Soon

    Updated: Twitter will roll out an official advertising platform, likely within the next month or so, one of the company’s executives told an advertising-industry conference, according to a report in Media Post. Anamitra Banerji, head of product management and monetization at Twitter, apparently made the comment in response to a question from a panel moderator at the IAB Annual Leadership Meeting on Monday.

    Update: According to one source in the media industry, Twitter may launch its new advertising platform at the South by Southwest conference, which starts March 12. The social network is apparently working with several major partners for the launch, including “new and traditional media,” the source said. Choosing the music and interactive media conference to usher in the advertising platform would be fitting, since the use of Twitter during Sarah Lacy’s interview with Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg at SXSW in 2007 was seen by many as a tipping point for the service.

    Twitter is working on an ad platform, Banerji reportedly told Media Post following the panel, but currently it’s “only in the test phase.” People are constantly “talking and engaging with brands, sharing their feedback,” during events such as the SuperBowl, he said during the panel, asking the conference delegates: “What if brands start to participate?” He added that the company will make it “explicitly clear that a sponsor” paid for the ad, and make it “relevant and useful, so the user doesn’t think of it as an ad.”

    Twitter recently revealed that it has grown to the point where it is receiving and distributing 50 million tweets a day, or about 600 every second. That puts the social network up in Facebook territory. With that kind of growth, it makes sense that the company would want to take advantage of that user base and provide advertisers with a way to reach and target them. What remains to be seen is how the service implements ads, and whether or not users revolt against the commercialization of their social network.

    There are already several companies trying to take advantage of advertising in Twitter streams, including IZEA — formerly known as PayPerPost — and Ad.ly, which allegedly pays celebrities like Kim Kardashian thousands of dollars to tweet about various products and services. It will be interesting to see what happens to these and other “sponsored tweet” services when Twitter eventually rolls out its official platform.

    Some Twitter users say they will stop using the service if advertising becomes prevalent in their streams (but may be willing to pay a fee to keep it out), while others say that they welcome advertising and look forward to having Twitter target them based on the hashtags or keywords they use. What do you think? Will advertising change your experience or make you use Twitter less?

    Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    How Human Users Are Holding Twitter Back

    Post and thumbnail photos courtesy of Flickr user (michelle)

  • Yoo-Mee Launches Social Gaming Platform

    Hooked Media, a venture-backed startup based in San Francisco, launched a platform today that it hopes will take social and casual games like Farmville and Bejeweled and give them a life beyond Facebook or a single web site, allowing players to connect with each other through any social network, site or mobile device. The platform, called Yoo-Mee, allows game developers to create a “social wrapper” around their game that can be embedded in any website. Prita Uppal, founder of Hooked Media, says this will give game publishers the ability to cut deals with web site owners, and will generate more revenue for both content sites and game developers by increasing the number of advertising opportunities.

    “Developers can integrate their existing games into Yoo-Mee, web publishers can embed a full game experience onto their sites, and everyone benefits from additional revenue,” Uppal said in a statement. More than 200 million people play casual web games such as Farmville, Mafia Wars and Bejeweled on Facebook, MySpace and a variety of gaming websites. According to recent estimates, casual-gaming leader Zynga could be worth as much as $3-billion, based on the popularity of the company’s games and investment by venture backers such as Digital Sky Entertainment.

    Uppal says the Yoo-Mee platform can also take single-user casual games and turn them into social games, by allowing users to set up “challenges” or even full-fledged tournaments with their friends. The service has full Facebook Connect integration, so that a user can send a challenge to his or her Facebook friends and all players are then able to see each other’s score. “We are creating a more emotionally invested experience for casual gamers,” she said. Hooked Media already has deals in place with several game publishers, including Mumbo Jumbo Games, and is talking to others about using Yoo-Mee.

    Uppal said in an interview that the company’s target user is a 43-year-old woman, a persona that Hooked Media staff refer to as “Millie.” This jibes with recent research by PopCap into social and casual games, which found that the average social gamer is 43 years old and female. Just like this typical user, Uppal says she has always liked to play time-wasting games (her favorite is Brickbreaker on the BlackBerry) “because it’s a distraction, an opportunity to utilize a different part of my mind” than the one she uses while at work. Yoo-Mee’s existing games include puzzles, word games and repetitive Bejeweled-style games such as Bubble Town and Gems Twist.

    The Hooked Media founder says she became fascinated with the casual gaming industry while doing her MBA at Harvard, and even created a DVD trivia-contest game based on knowledge of India’s “Bollywood” film industry. A year and a half ago, the Minnesota native moved to San Francisco to start what became Hooked Media (formerly known as Gamook), and the company later got $4.5-million in financing from US Venture Partners and Altos Ventures to launch Yoo-Me.

    The social-gaming industry is known for a rapid pace of development and deployment of new games and features — something Zynga’s chief designer described in a recent interview with VentureBeat — and Uppal says that Hooked Media is trying to take the same approach to the Yoo-Mee platform. “We’re constantly pushing out new games, new types of tournaments, new forms of wagering,” she said in an interview. “We’re going to be launching a number of new features soon, including new types of tournaments or guilds that will only be available for a certain amount of time.”

    The revenue model behind the Yoo-Mee platform is based on three sources, Uppal says: from users entering into game tournaments (some are free and others cost money); from various in-game and other virtual offers including gifts and currency; and from standard advertising within the Yoo-Mee platform, such as banners, pre-roll ads before the game, etc. “Yoo-Mee’s introduction of a truly social and interactive gaming experience will translate into greater engagement between players and marketers,” Rick Lewis of US Venture Partners said in a statement prepared in advance of the launch.

    Related Post From GigaOM Pro: How the Next Zynga Could Reinvent Social Gaming

  • Hate ChatRoulette? Then You Hate The Internet

    Every once in a while, a service or feature comes along that crystallizes everything people love and hate about the Internet. ChatRoulette is definitely one of those services. Plenty has been written already about the new social tool, which is a little like the Internet video version of speed dating. It was created by a 17-year-old Russian student as a lark and has exploded in popularity with as many as 50,000 simultaneous users, attracting interest from some (including Union Square Ventures investor Fred Wilson, who offered to fly the founder to New York for an interview and suggested he might invest) and revulsion from others.

    The revulsion comes because of the somewhat prolific use of ChatRoulette by exhibitionists and other, er… excessively outgoing users, an experience that writer Ivor Tossell described eloquently in a recent article entitled “Click. Naked Guy. Click. Naked Guy. Click. Naked Guy.” Suffice it to say that young children — or even easily offended adults — shouldn’t be left to wander around ChatRoulette unsupervised. Tyler Coates of The Awl came up with a list of the top 25 things people said to him on ChatRoulette, which should give you some idea of what to expect.

    Based on a cursory glance through this kind of material, or some of the bizarre and hilarious screenshots that have sprung up around the web, it would be easy to dismiss the service as a kind of pornographic and/or mentally deficient version of StumbleUpon (which probably should have thought of it before Andrey Ternovsky did, to be honest). But services like ChatRoulette are like a Petri dish for the social web — what they show us is frequently unappetizing, and even unhealthy, but can also give us a glimpse of what the future (or at least one version of it) might look like. In a recent post about ChatRoulette, sociologist and Internet researcher danah boyd said:

    I find it difficult to respond to the fears because I find it endearing. ChatRoulette reminds me a lot of the quirkiness of the Internet that I grew up with. Like when I was a teen trolling through chatrooms, ChatRoulette is filled with all sorts of weird people.

    She adds that one of the things she likes most about the service is its randomness — you never know what you are going to find when you click the “Next” button. Boyd’s fellow researcher Sarita Yardi also wrote about the service in a guest post on boyd’s blog, saying:

    ChatRoulette reminds me of when people said blogging was like making a private diary public. The idea of sitting in your bedroom showing your face to anyone in the world is simultaneously anonymous yet deeply revealing. This violates almost all social norms of the offline world.

    There have been other services much like ChatRoulette. One of the first things it reminded me of when I saw it was an early Internet network called CU-SeeMe, which allowed anyone with a web-cam to connect to and see anyone else. Of course, in the mid-1990s when CU-SeeMe became available, hardly anyone had a web-cam, so mostly what you got was bored university students in their IT labs. Not long afterward, however, we got the JenniCam — an always-on webcam that Jennifer Ringley set up in her dorm room that displayed whatever she was doing, from homework and sleeping to sex.

    The main difference between then and now isn’t that anything radical has changed about the Internet or human nature, but a difference of scale. Instead of weak, dial-up connections to the web, broadband penetration is widespread (and likely to grow) and speeds are increasing. Streaming video is no longer something that is restricted to university students with their T1 lines. And webcams are ubiquitous as well, giving every teenager and bored retiree the equipment to jump on ChatRoulette or any other service. You think ChatRoulette is bad now? Wait until streaming video from cell phones and handhelds through services like Qik becomes commonplace.

    Former SixApart executive Anil Dash said recently that ChatRoulette made him think about the power of the audience and of shared experience (however tawdry that experience might be). New York magazine also had a recent piece about how ChatRoulette sums up a lot of what is both good and bad about human behavior, both on the Internet and in the real world. As usual, the Internet finds ways of holding up a mirror so that we can see ourselves as we really are, warts and all. That mirror is getting faster, better quality, becoming more widely distributed, and yes — now includes video.

    Related content from GigaOm Pro: Is Facebook Video Chat The Future of Social Media?

    Post photo courtesy of ChatRoulette Screenshots, thumbnail courtesy of Buzzfeed

  • What Do People Ask Their Social Networks?

    We’ve all seen people do it in our social networks, and there’s a good chance we’ve probably done it ourselves now and then. What is it? Asking questions of the people who follow us on Twitter, or our Facebook friends. You know the kind: What cellphone should I buy, what did you think of a particular movie, where can I get rid of an unlicensed handgun, that kind of thing (okay, that last one was me). But what are the most popular kinds of questions we ask our friends and followers? A new study from MIT and Microsoft Research took a look at that by asking a group of users what kinds of questions they asked their networks.

    According to the survey, questions ranged from the somewhat open-ended and philosophical (“Why are men so stupid?”) to the explicitly practical (“Point-and-shoot camera just died — need to replace it today for vacation. What should I buy?). The most popular question types were recommendation and opinion questions, such as “I’m building a new playlist — any ideas for good running songs?,” followed by factual knowledge and rhetorical types of questions (we’re assuming that the “Why are men so stupid?” one probably fell into the latter category).

    Not surprisingly, technology-related questions were the largest single topic (“Anyone know a good Windows 6 phone that won’t break the bank?”) followed by entertainment-related queries (“Was seeing Up in the theater worth the money?”). People also asked a lot of questions related to home and the family, including “What is the going rate for the tooth fairy?” and questions relating to shopping, travel, restaurants, etc. were also popular, including “What’s a good Mother’s Day gift?”

    For the survey, Meredith Ringel Morris and Jaime Teevan from Microsoft Research and Katrina Panovich from MIT asked 624 users, 25 percent of whom were female. More than 70 percent were full-time employees of Microsoft and 27 percent were university students working as summer interns at the software company. Almost half of those surveyed were between 26 and 35 years old, while almost 30 percent were between 18 and 25 years of age, and 25 percent were 36 to 45 years old.

    The survey showed that almost all of the users who responded (98 percent) had Facebook accounts, and 71 percent had Twitter accounts. The average size of a social network on Facebook was 209 friends, which is interesting if you’ve ever heard of Dunbar’s number — a theoretical limit on the number of people the average person can remain connected to in any meaningful way, which the social scientist said was usually 150. Most users who took part in the survey said that they asked their social networks questions because “I trust my friends more than I trust strangers,” while the second-largest response was “A search engine can provide data but not an opinion.”

    Interestingly enough, as part of the survey the MIT/Microsoft team asked respondents how many times they updated their Facebook status or their Twitter page, and found that more than 21 percent of those surveyed — the largest single group — updated their Twitter page a few times a day, whereas only 10 percent said the same thing of Facebook. The most common response for Facebook came from 30 percent of those surveyed, who said they updated their status a few times a week.

    Although drawing a lot of major conclusions from this survey wouldn’t be wise, considering its small sample size and the fact that it was composed entirely of Microsoft staff, there is no question (pun intended) that social networks are increasingly becoming the place where people find answers to their questions, from the trivial to the serious. The fact that this is happening, and the fact that many of those questions involve purchasing behavior, has implications for businesses and also for search giants like Google and Microsoft. For more on that, check out what Om had to say in a GigaOm Pro report called Why Google Should Fear The Social Web (subscription required).

    Post and thumbnail photos courtesy of Flickr user Oberazzi

  • Gordon Lightfoot Dies, Twitter Gets Blamed

    While driving back from a trip to the dentist on Thursday, Canadian folk singer Gordon Lightfoot was somewhat surprised to learn that he was deceased — at least, according to the radio station he was listening to. Thousands of other people discovered his death via Twitter, which exploded with reports of his demise and was soon filled with tributes to him, touching memories of where people were when they heard his classic songs, and so on. And thus, Lightfoot joined a select (but growing) group of celebrities who have been reported dead via Twitter — a list that includes Jeff Goldblum, Maya Angelou, Patrick Swayze (who did pass away soon afterwards), Zach Braff, Johnny Depp and Kanye West.

    Once it became known that Lightfoot had not in fact gone to his eternal reward, plenty of people spent the next several hours doing another thing that people love to do on Twitter: blame Twitter for spreading a fake news report. But as Peter Kafka correctly points out, Twitter didn’t kill Gordon Lightfoot — traditional media did. It appeared to start with a prank phone call (remember the telephone?) to the management company representing Lightfoot’s close friend and fellow musical legend Ronnie Hawkins, from someone pretending to be Lightfoot’s grandson.

    Hawkins then started calling people to let them know, who in turn alerted Canwest News Service, which called Hawkins to confirm the news and then published a brief news item that got picked up by a number of the chain’s newspapers. That report was then spread by reporters on Twitter, including Canwest political reporter David Akin, who later wrote a blog post about the role he played in the story.

    As Akin notes in his analysis of what happened, traditional news wires regularly report things that turn out to be wrong, including the deaths of famous people. Back in the PT days (pre-Twitter), only traditional journalists saw those reports, and while they occasionally made their way into print or onto a TV news show, for the most part newswires like the Associated Press and Reuters corrected them before they escaped into the real world (if you’re interested, Wikipedia has a pretty exhaustive list of everyone whose death has been prematurely reported, whether on Twitter or anywhere else). With Twitter, however — and an increasing number of traditional journalists using the social network — that kind of “news” leaks out faster than ever before, and it can get re-transmitted and re-broadcast far more broadly.

    Is that a bad thing? Maybe. But it is a reality. Call it the new ecosystem of news if you want to be fancy about it. And it’s worth noting that Twitter did just as good a job of being skeptical about the early reports, and of re-tweeting and re-broadcasting the corrections and verifications, as any traditional news source did — and arguably better. Disagree with me? Feel free to let me know in the comments, or on Twitter 🙂

    Post photo courtesy of someecards, thumbnail photo courtesy of Flickr user Bogenfreund

    Related GigaOM Pro content (sub req’d):

    How Human Users Are Holding Twitter Back