Author: Nicholas Deleon

  • elgato EyeTV HD DVR for Mac easily makes iPad-compatible versions of your favorite TV shows

    Mac users may get a kick out of this, the elgato EyeTV HD. It’s a DVR solution that works with your cable and satellite channels, sending everything to your Mac instead of a plain ol’ TV. From there you can watch or edit whatever you’ve recorded. Easy as pie.

    Why would you need such a device? Perhaps you don’t own a TV, but you want to be able to DVR every episode of “American Idol” or “The Best of PRIDE Fight Championships? Hook up the EyeTV HD to your Mac, and off you go. It’s a niche product, yes.

    That said, it does seem to be fairly thorough. You connect the device to your cable or satellite box via component cable, then connect the device to your Mac via USB. You install the software, then let her rip. The device encodes all video with h.264, which makes it easy to create iPhone or iPad-friendly files.

    Who needs to join shady BitTorrent Web sites in order to download iPhone-ready episodes of The Simpsons when you can make them on your own, legally. At least I think it’s legal, you never can tell with the DMCA.

    She’s $200.


  • Twitter reacts to last night’s episode of Lost, the last episode EVER: It was a storytelling Ponzi Scheme

    @RonnieBQuotes Lost = story-telling Ponzi Schemeless than a minute ago via txt

    Lost ended its glorious run last night. While I stopped watching the show about two years ago, I fully recognize that my fellow Americans absolutely love the show. In fact, they love the show so much that they’ve been tweeting about it non-stop. Come, let’s explore how the Twitterverse responded to this great TV moment!

    Here we go!

    The final message of Lost: dogs are awesome. #lostfinaleless than a minute ago via web

    Sadly, BP waited too long to hire Jack to plug up the Gulf of Mexico oil leak with a giant cork. #lostless than a minute ago via web

    End of LOST yesterday… End of 24 tonight… It’s the end of the world, as we know… and I feel fine.less than a minute ago via web

    Sin cervezas Polar, Venezuela sería como la isla de Lost. Nadie sabría que coño hacer y porque estan aqui.less than a minute ago via web

    That was it? That’s the big secret? Castaways were in an Italian restaurant the whole time?! Oh, wait, that was an Olive Garden ad. #lostless than a minute ago via HootSuite

    Meh 🙁 #Lostless than a minute ago via TweetDeck

    #LOST – You completed me.less than a minute ago via TweetDeck

    can’t wait for lost, lepidus http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xiB6QokvyCkless than a minute ago via web

    I think that sums of pulse of America (well, there entire world, what with that Venezuela tweet in there). There’s approximately 80 zillion tweets dedicated to Lost in the past 24 hours, so this represents a fraction of a fraction of a fraction…

    One question: Should I pick up the show again? I stopped with the season that ended in Spring, 2008.


  • TV viewers now refusing to watch SD content?

    There’s a handy option in the DirecTV menu guide for “HDTV Channels.” On the rare occasion when I’m actually sitting in front of the TV looking to “channel surf” (more like “menu surf” nowadays), it’s only “HDTV channels” I’m concerned with. Nearly halfway through 2010, it has come to the point where, unless I absolutely have no other choice, I simply won’t watch a network unless the program is in HD. Has it come really come to that? That, unless a show is in HD, you’ll simply skip it?

    Pretty sure I first heard of this last week on the radio, I think on Ron and Fez, that for the first time ever TV networks are starting to see their ratings decline specifically because they’re not in HD. That is, people now refuse to watch TV unless it’s in HD! How wild is that? I mean, assuming it’s true…

    It probably means a few things. One, biggish networks that aren’t in HD yet should now be shaking in their boots. For whatever stupid reason, DirecTV hasn’t picked up the HD feed of Fox Soccer Channel. That doesn’t mean much to most people, but when given the choice between watching a Premier League game in SD on my HDTV or watching the same game with a tiny online stream (which is probably illegal but who cares?) on my computer, freeing me to play simultaneously play some
    http://www.crunchgear.com/tag/steam/”>Steam
    games in windowed mode, then I’m absolutely going to go with the stream. I will go out of my way to watch an HD feed of a game, subjecting myself to TV’s controls for 90 minutes, but in 2010 SD sports broadcasts really ought to be outlawed. I’d almost rather listen to an audio play-by-play than watch an SD image on my HDTV.

    I should stress that Fox Soccer Channel does, in fact, have an HD feed, it’s just that DirecTV hasn’t picked it up yet. Boo!

    This could also mean that smaller TV networks are doomed. If people are now skipping SD content altogether, how can Some Niche Channel survive? It’s not exactly cheap to record and air HD content, so the little guy may be squeezed out.

    Or maybe this isn’t true at all? I’m pretty sure only something like 50 percent of TVs in America are HDTVs, so these people aren’t going to miss something (HD broadcasts) that they never would benefit from anyway.

    I’ll throw it to you guys now: do you still watch SD content on your HDTVs? Again, I pretty much don’t, but I realize my opinion may not exactly line up with a “normal” person’s.


  • Kindle 2.5 update coming down the pike right now

    It looks like Kindle firmware 2.5 is trickling out to certain Kindle DX owners right this very second. This ought to mean that the update will hit a Kindle near you rather shortly.

    You’ll recall that this update brings Facebook and Twitter applications to the e-reader. Can’t imagine either being too useful beyond the initial “hey let’s check this out” honeymoon, but here we are.

    Yup, that’s it. Quick little story, this.

    Flickr’d


  • UK misses out on Nike World Cup ad, Rooney red-hot with anger (maybe)

    That Nike World Cup ad I mentioned the other day has aired, I think, 800 million times over the past few days on TV. I know I saw it at least once during the Champions League final at the weekend (which Inter thoroughly deserved to win). But get this: the very first time the ad aired in the UK the final six seconds of the ad never made it on the air! Someone’s getting fired…

    Here’s the LOL-worthy statement from ITV, where the ad was supposed to debut during said Champions League final:

    A technical problem affected play-out of a Nike advertisement for approximately 6 seconds to ITV1 regions in the south of England and Wales. ITV has apologised unreservedly to Nike and we are engaged in dialogue with the client regarding the issue.

    It’s estimated that Nike had to cough up anywhere from £350,000 to £500,000 ($503,000 to $719,000) to air the ad. That’s just to air the ad, mind you, not how much it cost to create. Drogba, Rooney, Ronaldo & Co. don’t come cheap.

    Nike called the mix-up “disappointing,” noting that the ad had some 5 million views online and, golly gee, it sure would have been neat for actual TV viewers to see it.


  • What’s the deal with Red Dead Redemption?

    Rockstar’s Red Dead Redemption came in the mail on Tuesday, and my first course of action was to call the Ron and Fez Show on Sirius XM. “Hey, guys, I see your names in the credits. You rock!” Calling the show and talking to East Side Dave (by the way, SAVE DAVE) and Ron was the highlight of my week. Well, it was the highlight of my week until I was able to pop the disc into my 360 (it’s also available for the PS3). As I told Ron on the air, Rockstar knows how to make a good video game. A really good video game, in fact.

    What’s pretty funny about Red Dead Redemption is that I’ve seen it derisively referred to as nothing more than Grand Theft Auto IV in the Wild West. You know, as if GTA IV is a bad game! Was the hype surrounding that game warranted? I don’t know. What I do know is that it was a fine, fine game in a world filled with (polluted with?) generic modern warfare shooter after generic space marine shooter. There’s more to GTA than running over pedestrians and robbing hot dog vendors. Play the missions, let the story develop, and you’ll say to yourself, “There’s actually a pretty great script and some solid voice acting here.” Rockstar (along with BioWare) is the best in the business in that regard.

    It’s 1911, and the old ways of the West are dying; its days of being “wild” are drawing to a close. That’s not good news for the game’s main character, a well-dressed ex-crook named John Marston who’s forced to track down one of his old running buddies for the increasingly powerful federal government. (I feel like I’m channeling Rush Limbaugh or that other bozo with “increasingly powerful federal government.”) You approach your destination, from parts unknown, on a train straight out of “There Will Be Blood,” eavesdropping on the conversations of an old woman who speaks of bringing “civilization” to the area and a young woman who asks her father to reconcile Christianity’s many contradictions.

    This will not be a light day at the office.

    Your train pulls up to a small town in the middle of nowhere, and off you go.

    This sandbox-style game takes place in a literal sandbox: dirt and broken down rocks comprise the majority of the scenery, and cacti and other rubbish-looking plant life remind you that you’re not “back east” anymore. It’s a big sandbox, too, and as believable as Liberty City, with cross-map trips taking upwards of 10 minutes on horseback. Small towns—nothing more than a couple of shacks and a saloon—rise out of the nothingness and offer you a place to have a drink, buy guns and ammunition from a vendor voiced by noted gun nut Anthony of Sirius XM’s Opie and Anthony, gamble with local miscreants, and rest/save your game. Nowhere near a town? With a few button presses you’ve made a campfire, where you can save your game and fast-travel to a waypoint. Don’t fast-travel too often lest you diminish the game’s sense of scope. Exploration is vital, as it’s the only way to find and kill local fauna, whose hides you can collect and later sell.

    You already know how to use the map; it’s identical to GTA IV’s. Letters hover over it, located on the lower left-hand side of the screen, and point to mission-giving characters. You visit these characters, obtain a mission, complete the mission, then go on another mission until you move onto the next mission-giving character. This moves the story along, in short, well-acted cinematics—again, like in GTA. You’ll have noticed a pattern by now.

    Mid-mission checkpoints are more frequent, thank heavens.

    When I played the game at PAX East a few weeks (months? I’ve lost all track of time) back, one of the things the friendly Rockstar rep highlighted was the horse mechanics. I’m almost certain that’s the first time I’ve written the phrase “horse mechanics.” There’s nothing to it: you tap A to get the horse going, then hold A to keep steady the pace, steering all the while with the Left Stick. When in town you hitch your horse to a handy hitching pole—the horse will wait for you. Or, if out in the middle of nowhere, hitting Up on the D-Pad causes you to whistle out for the horse, which shows up a few moments later. It’s all very Zelda-like, an observation that rather pleased the Rockstar rep. There’s no harm in being compared to Zelda.

    Aiming is less frustrating than it’s been in past Rockstar games. You whip out your gun with the Left Trigger. The default mode lets you free-aim with the Right Stick, but if you pull the Left Trigger while near, say, a bad guy’s head, the aiming reticule automatically locks on. Then you pull the Right Trigger. Then the bad guy dies. It’s all very poetic. In my view this is Rockstar saying, “Look, there’s no way in hell you’re going to have any sort of precision while aiming with the 360 controller, so let’s just automate the process for you as much as possible.” (There is, of course, a fully manual mode if you’re a crazy person.) Rockstar should be given credit for trying (and trying… since the days of GTA III for the PS2) to figure out how to make aiming with a controller as painless as possible, but let’s face facts: no control scheme will ever better a mouse and keyboard. This is not up for debate. Perhaps a PC version is warranted? The game looks good on the aging 360 hardware, but I wouldn’t mind seeing the visual bump with a modern day video card and processor.

    The multi-player? I know that it exists, but I haven’t put in the time to write about it. My guess is that if you got a kick out of GTA IV’s multi-player mode then you’ll probably feel right at home here.

    A few more things come to mind. One is that Rockstar seems to have perfected this particular type of gameplay experience. That is, going from person to person, doing mission after mission, developing a story along the way that’s better than much of what’s coming out of Hollywood these days—Rockstar has that on lockdown. For how much longer will that appeal, I wonder? The second is that Rockstar’s virtual worlds are the most convincing in gaming today. Red Dead Redemption’s lands aren’t as densely populated as Liberty City, but every single inhabitant has something on his or her mind, and will, if given the opportunity, talk your ear off. Voice actors not currently affiliated with BioWare (because they already know this) take note: this is how lines are supposed to be delivered. I’ve recently been playing through Halo 3 and I can, at times, feel my kidneys cringe in embarrassment at some of the dialogue. So bad.

    How do I end this? I guess by saying the game could be Rockstar’s best effort yet. So if that appeals to you…


  • Video: Yup, that’s Everquest running on a Motorola Droid

    The most important part of a mobile phone’s lifespan is when it’s hacked to run old video games. Few games are more classic than Everquest, the game that brought the MMO to a mass audience. I think that’s fair to say. Anyhow, today’s the Droid’s lucky day!


  • Pac-Man greets Google visitors

    An exciting thing happened to people who actually visit the Google homepage (rather than just using their Web browser’s built-in search box) today. They found Pac-Man, celebrating his 30th anniversary! The Penny-Arcade guys must be freaking out.

    Update – Guess what? It works on the iPad.

    You click “Insert Coin” and are thrown into a classic game of Pac-Man. I beat the first level and decided that was enough for me.

    I do love the careful balance Google maintains between stomping all over your reasonable expectations of privacy and offering up electronic tiddlywinks.

    UPDATE – I was curious as to whether this doodle would work on mobile browsers so I fired it up in the iPad. It sat there for a moment but when the Javascript loaded it started up and I was able to play the game by sliding my finger up, down, left, and right on the screen. Pretty fun.


  • Sega delays Sonic 4 till later this year (but there will now be an iPhone version!)

    It would appear that Sonic 4 has been delayed until the “latter half of 2010.” That’s the bad news. The good news? One, there’s a new trailer. Two, it’ll also come out for the iPhone and iPod touch (in addition to the platforms we already knew about). Hear that, Nintendo?

    The full title of the game is Sonic the Hedgehog 4: Episode I, which is something of a mouthful. I’ll just say Sonic 4 from here on out.

    In any event, the game has been delayed in order to “allow for more careful focus on the design of each level and to provide additional polish that an important game like this demands, ultimately providing fans with an unrivaled classic Sonic feel.”

    Sonic 4 is a perfect fit for the iPhone. I mean, the controls consist entirely of holding the D-Pad left then occasionally pressing the jump button.

    It’s probably too late to call anything on the iPhone a “killer app,” but Sonic 4 certainly fits the mold.


  • Hard at work? Congress spends all day playing with the iPad

    The iPad is a huge hit in the United States Congress. I mean, passing any sort of meaningful banking reform is apparently out of the question with these guys , but there’s always time for the iPad. Just amazing, really.

    The story is that several members of Congress, including Sen. Claire McCaskill of Missouri, are head-over-heels in love with the iPad. My immediate reaction was, “Um, you do know that the American people have a very low opinion of you guys right now, right? It’s probably not the time to be gloating about how your $500 toy is the new hotness. There’s a lot of people out there who are out of work and would love to have an extra $500 to blow on a shiny piece of plastic, but that’s not going to happen any time soon.”

    That was my first reaction. Then I cooled down a bit and thought to myself, “Well, if they’re just using the iPad to replace their BlackBerry, reading and sending e-mail to their staff, checking their calendar, and so forth, then that’s probably not such a big deal.”

    There’s an “iPad caucus,” too, which I guess is trying to extol the merits of the device. Said one member, Rep. Rob Wittman of Virginia:

    We are really trying to engage people about ways to apply this technology. This is definitely the wave of the future. … We’re explaining to people that this could actually make us all more efficient, especially when you only have 24 hours in the day.

    See? Innocent enough.

    But then you read something like this:

    A small crowd of lawmakers gathered last week in the House Republican cloakroom, cheering on Rep. Aaron Schock (R-Ill.) as he wildly steered Chaffetz’s iPad in his hands, the tablet serving as the steering wheel for an iPad-compatible race car game.

    Yeah, that’s pretty ridiculous.

    Isn’t Congress great? I turn 25 next year, maybe I should run? My platform will be, “I won’t spend all day screwing around on my iPad. Oh, and I love America.”


  • Voice Over Revision A to power Verizon Wireless’ iPhone?

    Will the iPhone come out for Verizon Wireless? It’s the question that so many of the service’s subscribers would like to see answered definitively. This news story, unfortunately, won’t do that. What it will do, however, is fan the flames of the rumor fire. The latest is that the phone would work with Voice Over Revision A. In English that means the phone would be able to handle both voice and data connections simultaneously.

    As you know, CDMA phones cannot handle both at the same time—if you’re browsing the Web on your Droid or Incredible and a call comes in, your data connection drops off in order to accommodate the incoming voice. GSM has no such issues.

    This could sorta be seen as a stopgap move, in between the current vanilla CDMA implementation and LTE, or Voice Over LTE more specifically.

    Of course, the big rumor is still that CDMA iPhones will be massed produced beginning in August in September.

    The very moment, if it ever happens, that Verizon Wireless announces availability of the iPhone, be sure to check AT&T stock. That should be fun (unless you’re a shareholder).

    Flickr’d


  • Would America support a national broadband tax or is that too ‘big government’?

    The Cousins were mulling over a broadband tax, but the new Government has put a stop to that. (Now they’re considering using some of the BBC license fee to fund broadband development.) The idea was to charge people 50p (around $0.70) per month to fund the expansion of broadband into rural areas. Would such a move work here in the U.S.? Would you be willing to pay, say, $1 per month, paying toward some sort of Broadband Fund, to ensure that people in the middle of nowhere have access to reliable broadband? What’s more American than wanting to help your neighbors?

    The UK plan, as I understand it, was supposed tack on an additional 50p (that’s read “fifty pence”—watching Sky Sports News has made me familiar with the Pound Sterling, especially during football transfer season) to your monthly tax bill. Doing some maths, that works out to £6 per year. That’s £6 per year to ensure that the fine people of Hull and the North East have access to broadband.

    Let’s take that idea and apply it to us here in the U.S. You send the IRS an additional ~$10 every April, ~$10 that goes to a Broadband Fund. That money is then used to develop a modern broadband infrastructure in places that otherwise would go without. I don’t know if the good people of, say, Wyoming or Nebraska currently have access to 100 mbps broadband, but it sure would be useful.

    Imagine an entire United States of America wired for broadband! And by “broadband” I don’t mean some crummy DSL service that’s marginally faster than AOL dial-up. No, I’m talking 100 mbps at a minimum for everyone. What better way to spur the likes of Netflix to increase the quality of its streaming movies? (I shudder to compare a Blu-ray with a Netflix stream!) Maybe Hulu could bump up the resolution (while dialing down the compression) of “Parks and Recreation”?

    Broadband for everyone! Who’s with me?


  • Apple changes its tune, will now accept cash for the iPad at the Apple Store

    Who didn’t see this coming? A few days ago we learned of one woman’s inability to buy an Apple iPad with cash at an Apple Store. Store policy was such that they would only accept credit cards or debit cards. Apple was totally in the right legally, but it came across sorta funky, particularly given the woman’s backstory. Well, after a few days of bad press Apple has changed the policy: you can now walk into any Apple Store and buy an iPad with cash.

    Apple issued the following statement to KGO-TV, the station where this story first broke:

    About a month ago, we said we’d like you to use a credit card when you buy your iPad, and that was the best way we could think of to make sure that people only bought two per individual. And then it came to our attention that Diane [Campbell], through your story, was very interested in buying an iPad with cash, and we made a decision today to change that.

    That’s that, then.

    As of right now, you should be able to walk into your local Apple Store and walk out with a shiny, new iPad having paid cash.

    A victory for the little guy, for sure.


  • Newzbin has shut down

    Well that didn’t take long. Newzbin.com has shut down, just about six weeks after the High Court in the UK ruled against the Usenet indexing site. You had to see this coming.

    The immediate reason for the closure was administration, which is sorta like bankruptcy here in the U.S. The court case against the Motion Picture Association drained the Web site dry, especially after being forced to pay the MPA’s court fees. resulting in the friendly “Newzbin Closed” message on the site today.

    The site didn’t keep any logs to speak of, so if you were a member there’s no reason to freak out. I had a subscription once upon a time, and I’m not worried in the least.

    There’s some sort of mystery regarding what happened to the site’s source code. Did someone steal it? Did a monster eat it?

    There are, of course, plenty of other Usenet indexing sites out there, but Newzbin was sorta the elder statesman of the crowd. I mean, the .nzb files that people use to download from Usenet do stand for .NewZBin…

    Even if all these indexing sites go under, I look forward to reading Usenet the old fashioned way: one group at a time, manually.


  • You’re playing a lot of mobile games on the subway, aren’t you?

    You’re on the subway on the way to work. It’s not a long trip, maybe 15 to 20 minutes long if you’re coming in from an outer borough. You have to kill the time somehow lest you be alone in your thoughts for a few moments. What do you do? If we’re to believe a new survey, then you’ may well whip out your phone to play a video game. Back in the day, people would have had a paperback or magazine handy. Times, they are a….

    The survey, carried out by Popcap, the social games company, suggests that today 25 percent of 16-24-year-olds play mobile games to pass the time on public transportation. It was only 10 years ago that 11 percent of respondents would have chosen a game over reading material.

    The survey asked some 1,500 Britons of that age group to respond. These 1,500 people speak for us all.

    Then you have to take into considering that the survey was carried out by a company that would directly benefit from an increase in mobile gaming.

    Anecdotally, I guess those numbers work out. You occasionally see people on the subway in New York reading a newspaper or whatever—I’ve actually seen a few e-readers of late—but then you’ve got all these older people playing some game on their BlackBerry or iPhone.

    Me? There’s a 100 percent chance I’m listening to a podcast while on the train. Or plane or automobile, for that mater.

    via The Guardian

    Flickr’d


  • World of Warcraft Auction House heads to iPhone; Blizzcon tickets on sale next month

    You can now monitor your World of Warcraft auctions using your iPhone (or iPod touch). A new version of Blizzard’s Armory App now gives users the ability to tap into the game’s Auction House, wherein gamers can keep tabs on their sales of copper stacks and see how much Spellweave is going for.

    There’s also a Web version of the mobile Auction House, but that’s a little less exciting.

    The Auction House functionality is being beta tested right now. As such, it’s totally free to use. Fair warning: Blizzard does intend to charge $2.99 per 30 days for mobile access to the Auction House when the App leaves beta. I’d like to accuse Activision for coming up with that unnecessary fee, as it seems their wont. Do I have any proof of that? Absolutely not.

    Nerd rage aside, it’s actually a fairly neat idea—longtime readers should recognize that “fairly neat” is mighty high praise coming from me. It basically gives you access to the whole of the Auction House while on-the-go (assuming you have AT&T reception, something that isn’t always guaranteed). You can create and bid on auctions; it’s not some two-bit “monitor” where you can see what’s going on but cannot interact at all.

    That said, “serious” auctioneers tend to use the Auctioneer add-on. Essentially, it gives you a whole heck of a lot more control over your auctions. Sorta the difference between driving a manual transmission car vs. an automatic.

    Of course, my realm, Aggramar, isn’t included in the beta. Wonderful.

    In other Blizzard news (which I forgot to mention yesterday), Blizzcon tickets go on sale on June 2 and June 5. (The convention occurs on October 22 and 23 in Anaheim.) They’re releasing tickets in two groups this year, trying to make things more fair. Apparently having a Battle.net accounts makes things easier when trying to buy tickets. Also, just like last year, the convention will be live-streamed online and made available as a DirecTV pay-per-view.


  • Did Rogers Wireless ruin this woman’s life (or is she simply a fool)?

    A Canadian woman has sued Rogers Wireless over privacy concerns. Sounds normal so far, right? Let’s add a little color to the sentence, then gauge your reaction. A Canadian woman has sued Rogers Wireless for inadvertently disclosing an affair she was having, citing privacy concerns. Hmm, that’s a little less normal, now isn’t it?

    But that’s the story!

    A Canadian woman had a cellphone with Rogers. Then she got married, and her husband opened up a landline and Internet connection for the house. Rogers then combined the bills—the woman’s cellphone, the shared landline and Internet connection—into one invoice that was sent to the husband at their domicile.

    Now, was Rogers “in the right” when it combined the cellphone bill, which was originally in the woman’s name, with the newly opened landline and Internet connection?

    Moving on, the husband, flipping through one month’s invoice, noticed several, hour-long conversations that were with one particular phone number. He called the number, getting the person on the other end of the line to confirm that, indeed, there had been an affair.

    The husband left, then the woman claims her life fell apart. Among other things, her work performance suffered, which caused her to lose her job. For that she wants $600,000 from Rogers, technically for “invasion of privacy and breach of contract.” The contract being her cellphone service that she never requested be billed to her husband.

    Time to play armchair analyst. Did Rogers do anything wrong here, and if so, does it owe the woman any money, specifically $600,000? I can see the woman’s point in that her cellphone was her cellphone, and Rogers probably didn’t have to combine it with the family’s landline and Internet connection. Does that warrant a breach of contract? I’m not a Canadian contract lawyer, so beats me. At the same time, Rogers wasn’t responsible for the woman’s affair, and it certainly wasn’t responsible for the woman reacting in the manner she did, causing her life to fall apart.

    Could the woman have been caught, gotten a divorce, then moved on with her life? You know, be an adult about the situation? I suppose, but then again I have no emotional attachment to the story.


  • Epic Games says something silly about piracy

    Anyone else tired of video game publishers complaining about piracy? Like, human nature is such that you’ll always have a bunch of knuckleheads who will hop on BitTorrent and download away. Forget them, they’re jerks. Just focus on the non-jerks out there and go about your business. Anyhow, today the spotlight falls on Epic Games, makers of Unreal and Gears of War. Seems those guys think that all the money these days is in consoles, so PC gamers will have to get used to crummy ports or nothing at all!

    Said Epic Games President Mike Capps:

    We still do PC, we still love the PC, but we already saw the impact of piracy: it killed a lot of great independent developers and completely changed our business model… So, maybe Facebook will save PC gaming… but it’s not going to look like Gears of War.

    Where is it written that Gears of War is the end-all, be-all of video games? Not going to “look” like the game? What, dozens of shades of brown and gray? Gears was a lot of things, but I don’t know if I’d ever call it “pretty.” Slow down, Epic. It’s not like you’re making Okami over there.

    But let’s not single out Epic Games. It’s the same story over and over again: piracy is killing us, so we’ll have to do something else. Of the Xbox 360 and the PS3, what has the most piracy? Pretty sure it’s impossible to pirate PS3 games. And what system has done better, sales-wise? That would be the Xbox 360.

    So clearly piracy = ruination. Not that I’m defending piracy, of course, but I would appreciate if publishers would find a new demon to blame their ills on. Maybe sun spots?


  • Apple doesn’t accept cash at the Apple Store, not even for an iPad

    A human interest story, brought to us by the fine people at KGO-TV in San Francisco. It goes something like this: a woman had saved up for a very long time to buy an Apple iPad. So goes into an Apple Store, tells the clerk that she’d like to buy an iPad, then whips out the requisite $600. Six-hundred in cash, mind you. Then the Apple clerk drops a bombshell: sorry, but we don’t accept cash here.

    While it may seem unusual, there’s no law on the books that says Apple has to accept your money, cash or otherwise. It’s well within its rights to say, “Yeah, we only accept credit or debit cards here.”

    Apple says that’s the policy in order to prevent evildoers from buying a bunch of iPads with cash, then turning around then putting those iPads on the gray market. (Apple limits iPads to two per person. So it swipes your card and says, “Whoa, buddy, says here you already bought two iPads. We can’t sell you this.”

    On one hand, I can see people rallying around the woman in the story. Her circumstances are such that you’re quick to say, “Hey, Apple, stop being a bunch of jerks and let the woman have the iPad already. What’s the big deal?”

    On the other hand, Apple can simply tap the sign and say “policy is policy.”

    You can’t fight City Hall.


  • PSN Premium rumor has the Internets shaking in its boots

    In my lower moments I can be found browsing various message boards, watching mere children argue over what video game console is superior, the Xbox 360 or the PS3. No, I’m not lying, sad as that may be. Eventually the PS3 supporters whip out this gem: “Yeah, well at least we don’t have to pay to play online,” which is a clever dig at Xbox Live’s $50 price tag. Don’t tell them this rumor, then: Sony will unveil a PSN Premium at E3 next month, and it will cost money.

    The deal is that Sony will announce a PSN Premium of sorts at E3. It won’t affect the way you play PSN right now, so I don’t know why I raised that specter a few sentences ago. The day after it comes out, you’ll still be able to shoot your friends dead in Modern Warfare 2 totally gratis. Rather, this premium service will add all sorts of bells and whistles such as a free game every month and a music streaming service à la Spotify (which is great, I’m using it right now as I type).

    Those are the only two items mentioned, a free game and a music streaming service.

    Again, I must stress that this is merely a rumor, one of many pre-E3 rumors that are floating around out there, ruining people’s lives and causing public relations departments to copy-paste “It’s not our policy to comment on rumors” in e-mail after e-mail.

    Depending on the game, the free game gimmick may just sorta be “meh,” but if you were able to play Racing Game with any song in this streaming service’s catalog, well, that would be neat.

    What else could such a premium service add? Not being a PS3 owner, I’m only vaguely familiar with PSN’s offerings. Maybe Sony will throw unlimited (or limited!) movie rentals/streams, something along those lines.

    I have no idea, clearly.