Author: papundits

  • Blame Bush – Global Warming + More

    Vancouver Olympics

    Brief

    The Foundation

    “Man, once surrendering his reason, has no remaining guard against absurdities the most monstrous, and like a ship without rudder, is the sport of every wind.” –Thomas Jefferson

    Vancouver Olympics

    For the Record

    “NBC (which is owned by General Electric) [has begun] broadcasting the 2010 Winter Olympics from Vancouver, Canada. … [But some] events will be difficult to pull off. Why? There is no snow in Vancouver. And International Olympic Committee President Jacques Rogge knows exactly what is to blame: global warming. Rogge tells AFP: ‘Global warming of course is a worry, it is a worry for the entire world.’ Considering that NBC/GE has already received billions in TARP bailout cash from the Obama administration and is actively lobbying for a global warming energy tax bill so that it can receive billions more in government green-energy subsidies on top of the millions it already receives, we are sure to hear lots from NBC announcers about how the lack of snow in Vancouver is just another reason Washington needs to act now to stop global warming. But back in Washington, the global warming scare-monger crowd is singing a slightly different tune. Facing record snowfalls, Time is reporting: ‘Snowstorm: East Coast Blizzard Tied to Climate Change.’    …    But do not confuse this headline with Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s column from two years ago claiming that global warming was causing ‘anemic winters’ in the Washington region. No snow, too much snow. It does not matter to the enviroleft crowd. For them, global warming always is to blame.” –The Heritage Foundation “Morning Bell”

    Washington’s Birthday

    In some circles, today is observed as “Presidents’ Day,” jointly recognizing Presidents George Washington and Abraham Lincoln, but it is still officially recognized as the anniversary of “Washington’s Birthday” — and that is how we mark the date in our shop. (Washington’s actual birthday is next Monday, February 22.)

    As friend of The Patriot, Matthew Spalding, a Heritage Foundation scholar, reminds: “Although it was celebrated as early as 1778, and by the early 19th Century was second only to the Fourth of July as a patriotic holiday, Congress did not officially recognize Washington’s Birthday as a national holiday until 1870. The Monday Holiday Law in 1968 — applied to executive branch departments and agencies by Richard Nixon’s Executive Order 11582 in 1971 — moved the holiday from February 22 to the third Monday in February. Section 6103 of Title 5, United States Code, currently designates that legal federal holiday as ‘Washington’s Birthday.’ Contrary to popular opinion, no action by Congress or order by any President has changed ‘Washington’s Birthday’ to ‘Presidents’ Day.’”

    In honor of and with due respect for our first and (we believe) greatest president, arguably our nation’s most outstanding Patriot, we include two quotes from George Washington which best embody his dedication to liberty and God. The first from his First Inaugural Address, April 30, 1789, and the second from his Farewell Address, September 19, 1796.

    “The preservation of the sacred fire of liberty, and the destiny of the republican model of government, are justly considered as deeply, perhaps as finally, staked on the experiment entrusted to the hands of the American People.”

    “Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, Religion and morality are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of Patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great Pillars of human happiness — these firmest props of the duties of Men and citizens.”

    These quotes aptly sum up The Patriot Post’s mission and purpose.

    Opinion in Brief

    “Two centuries ago, King George III was told that President George Washington, who had eight years earlier turned down the opportunity to be the king of the United States, was planning to give up the presidency at the conclusion of his second term and return to his farm in Mount Vernon. The astonished monarch, who had lost a war to General Washington, said, ‘If he does that, he will be the greatest man in the world.’ Washington did, and he was. Does anything more clearly illustrate how far we have fallen in 210 years?” –columnist Burt Prelutsky

    Government

    “Government is taking us a long way down the Road to Serfdom. That doesn’t just mean that more of us must work for the government. It means that we are changing from independent, self-responsible people into a submissive flock. The welfare state kills the creative spirit. F.A. Hayek, an Austrian economist living in Britain, wrote ‘The Road to Serfdom’ in 1944 as a warning that central economic planning would extinguish freedom. … Hayek meant that governments can’t plan economies without planning people’s lives. After all, an economy is just individuals engaging in exchanges. The scientific-sounding language of President Obama’s economic planning hides the fact that people must shelve their own plans in favor of government’s single plan. At the beginning of ‘The Road to Serfdom,’ Hayek acknowledges that mere material wealth is not all that’s at stake when the government controls our lives: ‘The most important change … is a psychological change, an alteration in the character of the people.’ This shouldn’t be controversial. If government relieves us of the responsibility of living by bailing us out, character will atrophy. The welfare state, however good its intentions of creating material equality, can’t help but make us dependent. That changes the psychology of society. According to the Tax Foundation, 60 percent of the population now gets more in government benefits than it pays in taxes. What does it say about a society in which more than half the people live at the expense of the rest?” –columnist John Stossel

    Re: The Left

    “If you’ve been paying attention to the left-wing punditry these days, you may be under the impression that the nation’s institutions are on the verge of collapse. Or that the rule of law is unraveling. Or maybe that this once-great nation is crippled and nearly beyond repair. You know why? Because the 40 percent (or so) political minority has far too much influence in Washington. Don’t you know? This minority, egged on by a howling mob of nitwits, is holding progress hostage using its revolting politics and parliamentary trickery. … President Barack Obama, after his agenda had come to a halt, claimed democracy is a ‘messy’ process — as if that were a bad thing. Actually, ‘democracy’ is not only messy but also immoral and unworkable. The Founding Fathers saw that coming, as well. So we don’t live under a system of simple majority rule for a reason, as most readers already know. The minority political party, luckily, has the ability to obstruct, nag, and filibuster the majority’s agenda. Otherwise, those in absolute power would run wild — or, in other words, you all would be living that Super Bowl Audi commercial by now. … [T]oday’s argument that the ruling party doesn’t have enough power is a reflection of a nearly spiritual belief in the wonders of government, not democracy.” –columnist David Harsanyi

    Obama Blames Bush

    Political Futures

    “How could such smart people do so many stupid things? That question, or variations on it, is being asked in Washington and around the country about the Obama administration. The same people who directed the campaign that defeated Hillary Clinton and routed John McCain, a campaign that raised far more money and attracted far more volunteers than any before it, have within a year come up with a legislative program that is crashing in ruins and that, to judge from recent polls, has left the Democratic Party weaker than I have seen it in almost 50 years of closely following politics. … Team Obama failed to realize they were no longer running in Chicago or in the Democratic primaries or facing an electorate fed up with Republicans. And, more important, they failed to realize that vastly expanding government goes deeply against the American grain — and against the basic appeal of their successful campaign.” –political analyst Michael Barone

    The Gipper

    “There are those, of course, who claim we must give up freedom in exchange for economic progress. Well, pardon me, but anyone trying to sell you that line is no better than a three-card-trick man. One thing becoming more clear every day is that freedom and progress go hand in hand. Throughout the developing world, people are rejecting socialism because they see that it doesn’t empower people, it impoverishes them.” –Ronald Reagan

    Liberty

    “Most of us want to be fair, in the sense of treating everyone equally. We want laws to be applied the same to everyone. We want educational, economic or other criteria for rewards to be the same as well. But this concept of fairness is not only different from prevailing ideas of fairness among many of the intelligentsia, it contradicts their idea of fairness. … This more hands-on concept of fairness gives third parties a much bigger role to play. But whether any human being has ever had the omniscience to determine and undo the many differences among people born into different families and cultures — with different priorities, attitudes and behavior — is a very big question. And to concentrate the vast amount of power needed to carry out that sweeping agenda is a dangerous gamble, whose actual consequences have too often been written on the pages of history in blood.” –economist Thomas Sowell

    Culture

    “Seventeen years ago, General Colin Powell, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, helped formulate the policy that has come to be known as ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.’ It allows gay men and lesbians to serve in the armed forces, provided that they keep their sexual orientation to themselves. Today, Powell is in favor of repealing the policy he crafted and advocated. Well, he was right then, but wrong now. According to Powell, ‘attitudes and circumstances have changed’ since ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ was adopted. Sure, attitudes toward homosexuality have changed in the culture at large. But what hasn’t changed is the need for ‘order and discipline in the ranks,’ to use Powell’s own phrase, and the possible impact of allowing openly gay people to serve in the armed forces. … The bond between men in a sound military unit is more like agape — the love that moves men to sacrifice their lives for their buddies. … Allowing openly gay men threatens this cohesion by raising the possibility of a different kind of love — eros — which is ‘individual and exclusive.’ ‘All for one and one for all’ could give way to ’sexual competition, protectiveness and favoritism,’ with disastrous military consequences. Nothing has happened in the last 17 years that makes this less possible or the possible consequences less dire. All that has changed is that many Americans now see everything through the prism of ‘rights.’ For them, sexual rights and personal autonomy trump everything else. Thus, any opposition to changing military policy must be the result of ‘bigotry’ or ‘homophobia.’ I suspect I’m not alone when I say a military unit which openly celebrates the gay lifestyle in the trenches is not a military unit I want to serve in.” –commentator and author Chuck Colson

    Reader Comments

    “When I watched that Audi ad my jaw literally dropped open. Other’s watching it thought it was funny or at worst cute. I was sitting there thinking to that there exist people in the nation that would LOVE to see a green police become the law enforcement of the land. Very scary indeed.

    “My neighbors have been shoveling over 50 inches of snow so far (the last three snow falls) and we are going to get four more inches today of ‘inconvenient truth.’ Everything has been paralyzed for almost a week. God works in wonderful ways, always with a plan, yet the liberal/progressives started spinning immediately this across-the-nation record snow and cold into evidence of global warming. How one’s mind can make such a connection, it is unbelievable. Liberalism is a mental disorder, to quote a famous radio talk-show host.” –Ileana

    “Man-made global warming is the greatest hoax of all time. It has nothing to do with the planet, and everything to do with concocting excuses for bigger government to take greater control of our lives.” –MichaelSSEC

    The Last Word

    “In lecturing us about blowing our money, The Great Ozbama displays breathtaking gall. Given that he is blowing trillions of our money, not his, and burying us in debt as no president in history, silence on the subject would seem more reasonable. To be nit-picky about it, since he is in citing trips to Vegas as particularly objectionable, I hold in my casino chip-calloused fingers a list procured from CanadaFreePress.com of Mrs. Obama’s staff and their salaries. She reportedly has a staff of 22 assistants. Yes, I said twenty-two. (Previous First Ladies’ dedicated staffs were in the single digits). Michelle’s little army includes a Chief of Staff costing $172,000 a year; a Deputy Chief of Staff at $90,000; a Director of Policy and Projects at $140,000; a Director of Communications at $102,000; a Deputy Director of Scheduling at $62,000; two Social Secretaries — mysteriously, one at $65,000, one at $64,000; an Associate Director of Correspondence at $45,000, an Assistant to the Social Secretary at $36,000, and more, in total consuming $6.3-million annually thus $25-million during her 4-year term. Not to mention a make-up artist and hair stylist. I have one assistant. Answer my own correspondence. Keep my own calendar. … Mr. President, sir, if you are going to lecture me about blowing my money in Vegas or turning down my thermostat or inflating my tires, do you think you could reign in your wife’s blowing of my money just a teeny bit?” –columnist Dan Kennedy

    Read more excellent articles at

    Filed under: 111th Congress, Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama), Climate Alarmists, Conniving Politicians, Demo-gogues, Democrats, Global Warming, Junk Science, Liberals, Marxists, News and Views Tagged: Annie, The Patriot Post

  • The Most Duplicitous President

    By Alan Caruba

    I have lived through thirteen presidencies starting with Franklin Delano Roosevelt in the late 1930s. I have followed the events of their administrations, policies, and lives, and I have read widely in the history of the nation.

    I do not think I have ever seen a more duplicitous President than Barack Hussein Obama. And that is saying a lot!

    I hold that all presidents must lie and be good liars at that. Having the welfare of the nation in their care and an ever shifting host of threats to America’s interests and defense, all presidents—-and for that matter—-all leaders of nations, elected or otherwise—-lie to ensure the outcome they desire.

    When I say “lie” in this context, I mean the shading of the truth, the telling of less than the whole truth, or the withholding of information in one fashion or another that is intended to influence decisions to achieve a particular political or strategic objective. The best presidents dedicated themselves to great enterprises such as the waging of wars of defense or resolving conflicts of one sort or another.

    The worst presidents lied to the nation to protect their personal interests and, of course, the classic example is Watergate in which President Nixon engaged in a cover-up of a totally stupid and needless break-in of the Democratic Party headquarters in Washington, D.C. President Clinton, caught out in a foolish affair with a White House intern, lied to everyone until he no longer could.

    President Obama, however, lies all the time and this is now so evident to the members of Congress that there are those in his own party who no longer trust him, even if they will not come out and say so publicly. Most certainly, the Republicans have no reason to trust him, but they have behaved with remarkable civility.

    Well, there was one exception when Sen. Joe Wilson of South Carolina was unable to contain himself during one of Obama’s speeches to a joint session of Congress and cried out, “You lie!” He was right, but he apologized anyway.

    It would be naïve to believe that all politicians don’t lie to their constituency, but some are more blatant about it than others. For the most part, the press protects them out of some unspoken belief that the people elected them and are in part responsible for the probity or lack of it.

    There are ample examples when the lies and behavior become so egregious even this rule of thumb cannot apply and here too there are examples of members of Congress who have been sent to jail, censored, and generally abandoned by the electorate.

    Two examples of Obama’s lies presented themselves this past week. One was the announcement that the United States would support launching talks on a United Nations treaty to regulate arms sales. Obama has repeatedly told America’s 90 million-plus gun owners that they had nothing to fear, but this reverses the Bush administration’s position which respected the Second Amendment and all its implications.

    All the pretty talk about the Conference on the Arms Trade Treaty is just camouflage for gun control. It is comparable to Obama’s quick flight to Copenhagen to address the UN Conference on Climate Change, returning to the U.S. to tell Congress that there was “overwhelming evidence” to support global warming. He was laughed at when he said that. (To learn more, visit www.ccrkba.org)

    The other example of Obama’s deceitful ways is the fact that the Interior Department, despite Obama’s call for offshore exploration and extraction of oil and natural gas in his State of the Union speech, has announced that no offshore energy exploration will take place in the Atlantic until at least 2014.

    Obama is the most anti-energy president to hold office since Jimmy Carter who drove the oil industry out of America, leaving the nation vulnerable to oil rich regions such as the Middle East. (To learn more, visit www.ierdc.org)

    Lying may not be an impeachable offense though surely it played a role in Nixon’s case and, to some extent, the proceedings against Clinton. A President can only be removed from office on conviction of treason, bribery, or other “high crimes and misdemeanors.”

    As of this writing, it seems likely that President Obama will be politically neutered after the November 2nd midterm elections. When even solidly blue states like Massachusetts reject Democrat candidates, the writing is on the wall.

    For now, I think we can expect to see Congress find ways to delay or dismiss Obama’s grand schemes to “transform” America. It doesn’t need transforming. It has been doing quite well, with some bumps along the way, without any more socialism, and without any more lies from the 44th President.

    Alan Caruba writes a daily post at Warning Signs. A business and science writer, he is the founder of The National Anxiety Center.

    Read more thought provoking articles at Warning Signs

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama), Blundering Bureaucrats, Conniving Politicians, Democrats, Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Political Prostitutes, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Public Opinion, Spine Donor Politicians Tagged: Alan Caruba, Joe Wilson R-SC, Obama Administration Policies, Obama Lies, President Obama, Tony, Warning Signs

  • Hopes And Prayers

    This is the latest from Canada’s Globe and Mail:

    NATO strikes kill 12 civilians in Afghanistan “NATO rockets missed their target and killed 12 civilians in southern Afghanistan on Sunday, as NATO and Afghan forces continued a massive attack on two Taliban-held regions.
    U.S. General Stanley McChrystal, the top NATO commander in Afghanistan, apologized to Afghan President Hamid Karzai for the accident.
    In a statement released by NATO, Gen. McChrystal said he regrets that innocent lives were lost in Nad Ali district.
    Mr. Karzai issued a statement minutes earlier saying 10 members of the same family died when a rocket hit a house. Before the offensive began, Mr. Karzai pleaded with Afghan and foreign military leaders to be extra careful to avoid civilian casualties.
    About 15,000 coalition troops are involved in Operation Moshtarak, named for a Dari word meaning “together” and launched before dawn Saturday. It’s one of the West’s biggest attacks since the start of the war in 2001.”
    -more

    Read More by 

    Filed under: Afghanistan, America (USA), Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Middle East, Politics, Public Opinion Tagged: Dry Bones, General Stanley McChrystal, Goldstone Report, Political Cartoons, Political Humor, Political Satire, Tony, War In Afghanistan

  • How The IPCC Made Africa Starve

    By Andrew Bolt

    Christopher Booker discovers yet another scandal in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, on which (Australian Prime Minister) Kevin Rudd bases his global warming policies. And this one directly implicates the IPCC chairman:

    One of the most widely quoted and most alarmist passages in the (IPCC’s) main 2007 report was a warning that, by 2020, global warming could reduce crop yields in some countries in Africa by 50 per cent…

    The origin of this claim was a report written for a Canadian advocacy group by Ali Agoumi, a Moroccan academic who draws part of his current income from advising on how to make applications for “carbon credits”. As his primary sources he cited reports for three North African governments. But none of these remotely supported what he wrote. The nearest any got to providing evidence for his claim was one for the Moroccan government, which said that in serious drought years, cereal yields might be reduced by 50 per cent. The report for the Algerian government, on the other hand, predicted that, on current projections, “agricultural production will more than double by 2020”. Yet it was Agoumi’s claim that climate change could cut yields by 50 per cent that was headlined in the IPCC’s Working Group II report in 2007.

    What made this even odder, however, was that the group’s co-chairman was a British agricultural expert, Dr Martin Parry, whose consultancy group, Martin Parry Associates, had been paid £75,000 by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) for two reports which had come to totally different conclusions. Specifically designed to inform the IPCC’s 2007 report, these predicted that by 2020 any changes were likely to be insignificant. The worst case they could come up with was that by 2080 climate change might decrease crop yields by “up to 30 per cent”…

    Yet when it came to the impact on Africa, all this peer-reviewed work – including further expert reports by Britain’s Dr Mike Hulme and Dutch and German teams – was ignored in favour of a prediction from one Moroccan activist at odds with his own cited sources.

    However, the story then got worse when Dr Pachauri himself came to edit and co-author the IPCC’s Synthesis Report (for which the IPCC paid his Delhi-based Teri institute…). Not only did Pachauri’s version again give prominence to Agoumi’s 50 per cent figure, but he himself has repeated the claim on numerous occasions since…

    A gigantic fraud is unravelling – and less than three years after the IPCC shared a Nobel Peace Prize with Al Gore for frightening billions of people rigid.

    And what does Rudd keep telling us about the now deeply suspect IPCC and its even more deeply compromised chairman?

    The first thing I’d say is the IPCC – International Panel on Climate Change – scientists has 4000 (sic) essentially humourless scientists in white coats who go around and measure things

    Andrew Bolt is a journalist and columnist writing for The Herald Sun in Melbourne Victoria Australia.

    Read more excellent articles from Andrew Bolt’s Blog

    Filed under: Africa, America (USA), Australia, Climate Alarmists, Climate Change, Conniving Politicians, Environment, Environmental activists, Fanatics, Fear-mongering, Fraud/Waste, Global Warming, Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Political Prostitutes, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Public Opinion, Spine Donor Politicians, U.N. – United Nations (United Nitwits) Tagged: Andrew Bolt, Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd, Climate Change Fraud, Climate Change Religion, Climategate, Global Warming Alarmism, Global Warming Hype, Tony, UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

  • Sealed With A Kick

    Satire by  Shawn Goodwin

    “My bounty is as boundless as the sea, my love as deep; the more I give to thee, the more I have, for both are infinite.” – William Shakespeare, Romeo and Juliet

    Today is Valentine’s Day. For some people across the globe, it is a time to bask in reciprocated – or in Vice President Joe Biden’s case, unreciprocated – love. Champagne will be flowing, flowers will be blooming, and candy will be distributed. For others, like those who have been “happily” married for more than five years, it is a day just like any other; save for a quick trip to the gas station and $5 spent on one wilted rose.

    Like the late, great Rodney Dangerfield, Valentine’s Day gets no respect, which is puzzling since the holiday was established over 1,500 years ago:

    “Saint Valentine’s Day (commonly shortened to Valentine’s Day) is an annual holiday held on February 14 celebrating love and affection between intimate companions. The holiday is named after one or more early Christian martyrs named Valentine and was established by Pope Gelasius I in 496 A.D. It is traditionally a day on which lovers express their love for each other by presenting flowers, offering confectionery, and sending greeting cards (known as “valentines”). The holiday first became associated with romantic love in the circle of Geoffrey Chaucer in the High Middle Ages, when the tradition of courtly love flourished.”

    If recent events are any indication, that tradition of courtly love died a slow, painful, sugar-injected death. There are very few true romantics left in the world, especially in the world of politics, where romanticism is about as welcome as a big, wet kiss
    from Steve Buscemi. However, some politicos can still channel their inner Cupid – Sen. Robert Byrd has been seen in the Capitol Rotunda brandishing a bow and arrow while wearing a diaper – and their Valentine’s Day plans have recently been revealed. Here are the most striking examples:

    Former President Bill Clinton has big plans in store for his wife this weekend. Ever the charmer, Bill reserved the penthouse suite inside New York’s Waldorf-Astoria Hotel as well as dinner for two at the Russian Tea Room. The gesture melted the heart of the usually frigid Secretary of State, until she learned that Bubba would be spending the weekend at the Ritz-Carlton . . . in Los Angeles. When asked why he would reserve a dinner for two if he would be on the other side of the country, Bill replied, “Because from the looks of your rear end, you have become quite the big eater.”

    Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin is booking a tiny chapel outside of Juneau on Sunday.  She is going to surprise “First Dude” Todd Palin by renewing their wedding vows in front of a select group of family and friends. The ceremony should proceed smoothly, but in case the paparazzi decide to descend upon the event, Gov. Palin will be ready. She plans to tweak the mainstream media by writing “I do” on her left palm because nothing says “I love you” like making Andrea Mitchell’s head explode.

    Some world leaders have a different definition of romance than most people. Take Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, for instance. This madman is hell-bent upon world domination, and judging by his country’s ongoing creation of nuclear centrifuges, his deeds echo his words. Iran’s nuclear weapons program is Ahmadinejad’s labor of love, so much so that he has drawn a heart on each and every one in ruby red lipstick. The president claims that the lipstick belongs to his “sister,” but after Sky News learned that Ahmadinejad shaves his legs, those claims have fallen on deaf ears.

    North Korean dictator Kim Jong-Il has earned a terrible reputation as a sadistic, war-monger who treats his countrymen like dogs. As a result, Dear Leader does not go out on many dinner dates. Kim’s terminal state of loneliness has forced him to take drastic measures and this week he joined Match.com. Sadly, after filling out the questionnaire and submitting a recent photo, the dating site rejected his application. Incensed, Kim fired off an e-mail to the site’s owners and received this reply:

    “Dear Mr. Jong-Il, thank you for your interest in Match.com. We regret to inform you that we cannot accept your application because it violates our Safety Policy. Our members want to feel safe with their companions, Mr. Jong-Il, and your response to the question, ‘What is your idea of a romantic evening?’ was completely inappropriate. No woman wants to hear that your idea of romance is ‘oppressing the proletariat.’ Similarly, no one wants to read that your perfect evening is ‘enjoying a meal next to the roaring nuclear fires of the former South Korea’, sir. We will keep your application on file, in case Coke-bottle glasses and drab pantsuits come back into vogue.”

    Now just because some politicians have a distinctly warped sense of romance does not mean that their quirks should transfer to the public at large. Most people would do well to stand by the classics. Giving flowers, chocolates, and greeting cards are the best bets. Buying your soul mate the stuffed “Nancy Pelosi Loves Your Vote This Much” doll? Eh, not so much.

    FamilySecurityMatters.org’s official satirist, Shawn Goodwin, is a blogger and police detective from Philly.

    Read more excellent articles from

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Humor, Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Politics, Propaganda, Public Opinion, Satire Tagged: FSM (Shawn Goodwin), Political Humor, Political Satire, Tony, Valentines Day

  • Obama’s Invisible Homeless And Hungry

    By Alan Caruba

    The most enduring images of the Great Depression from 1929 through to the beginning of World War II for America in 1941 were those of homeless people, hobo camps, and of soup kitchens to feed the hungry.

    During the Reagan years, the media was filled with stories of the homeless as if to refute any improvement in the economy under a conservative president. These days, however, as America’s national debt and deficit continues to spiral out of control, the poor and the hungry remain largely unseen and, most significantly, largely unreported.

    About the only thing one can find on the White House website with regard to homelessness are statements about the way “green jobs” will solve the problem. The first stimulus package, however, increased the amount of money that the nation’s food banks received in 2009 so someone involved understood America has a problem.

    The New York Times reported “a $100 million windfall of extra food…” Also reported was that “requests for emergency food assistance were up by 30 percent in 2008 over the previous year”, but the financial crisis did not occur until late into the last year of the second Bush term.

    As the recession took hold, one food pantry organizer noted that “the next layer of people” were showing up; “a rapidly expanding group of child-care workers, nurse’s aides, real estate agents and secretaries who are facing a financial crisis for the first time.”

    A recent study by Mathematica Policy Research revealed that in 2009 more than 37 million low-income people were receiving emergency food assistance through a network of pantries, kitchens, and shelters. Recipients represented “a broad cross-section of America, including 14 million children and three million elderly.”

    “Approximately 40 percent white, 34 percent were Afro-American, and 20 percent were Hispanic.” Though 36 percent of recipient households had one working adult, ten percent were homeless.”

    “Most of the organizations providing assistance in the network were faith-based” and I can recall the outcry when the Bush administration undertook to provide funding to these organizations.

    While the media reporting seems limited to official government statistics, currently citing unemployment at 9.4 percent, most observers believe that it is far closer to 17 percent and that figure would actually exceed the Depression era.

    There were no safety nets in the 1930s. Ironically, the programs put in place, Social Security, and later Medicare, are now all but bankrupt or soon will be. At the time they were instituted there were approximately sixteen workers paying into the system for every recipient, but now it is down to two workers per recipient and these programs represent both a high level of taxation and an increasing drain on the nation’s economy as demographic changes increase the numbers eligible for them.

    Entitlement programs, along with defense, represent half of the nation’s annual budget. The proposed Obama budget is widely regarded as bizarre for the amount of spending it proposes.

    In its first year, the Obama administration largely ignored joblessness in order to pursue a vastly expanded Medicare “reform” whose details, whenever they became known, generated a massive backlash from Americans who rightly saw the program as an effort to take over one sixth of the nation’s economy, putting it under federal control.

    Political observers all say that the Obama administration will now “pivot” and concentrate on jobs as the major issue this year. The Democrat controlled Congress, however, is doing little to adopt the factors that contribute to job creation.

    Virtually all economists recommend a reduction in the tax on U.S. corporations, currently among the highest in the world, rendering them less competitive and unable to expand their workforce.

    Beyond that, the great economic engine of small businesses have seen minimum wage requirements increase and a host of other regulations that punish all businesses when they are forced to lay off or fire employees; both discourage hiring. Meanwhile, huge pension and other benefits for unionized government related jobs are bankrupting the states.

    The “solutions” of the FDR years did nothing to relieve the Great Depression and are widely seen as having extended it. These same “solutions” are being pushed by the Obama administration, particularly in regard to increased taxation at the worst possible time.

    For now the homeless and hungry will remain invisible to most Americans, but the media will be able to ignore it for only so long and then it will have to be addressed.

    Alan Caruba writes a daily post at Warning Signs. A business and science writer, he is the founder of The National Anxiety Center.

    Read more thought provoking articles at Warning Signs

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Blundering Bureaucrats, Conniving Politicians, Democrats, economy, Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Public Opinion, Spine Donor Politicians Tagged: Alan Caruba, Green Jobs, Homeless Numbers, Homeless Solutions, Homeless Statistics, Obama Policies, Tony, Unemployment Concerns, Warning Signs

  • ClimateGate’s Phil ‘Hide The Decline’ Jones Admits Manipulating Data

    By Noel Sheppard

    The British scientist in the middle of November’s ClimateGate scandal says that contrary to what Al Gore and many in the media claim, the debate concerning manmade global warming is not over.

    “There is still much that needs to be undertaken to reduce uncertainties, not just for the future, but for the instrumental (and especially the palaeoclimatic) past as well,” Phil Jones, the former head of Britain’s Climatic Research Unit told the BBC.

    In a lengthy Q&A published at BBC.com Saturday, Jones also said: the recent warming trend that began in 1975 is not at all different than two other planetary warming phases since 1850; there has been no statistically significant warming since 1995, and; it is possible the Medieval Warm Period was indeed a global phenomenon thereby making the temperatures seen in the latter part of the 20th century by no means unprecedented.

    Maybe most important, Jones explained what “hide the decline” in ClimateGate e-mail messages meant confirming they manipulated data (questions in bold, with a hat tip to Sonic Frog via Glenn Reynolds):

    A – Do you agree that according to the global temperature record used by the IPCC, the rates of global warming from 1860-1880, 1910-1940 and 1975-1998 were identical? […]

    [T]he warming rates for all 4 periods are similar and not statistically significantly different from each other. […]

    B – Do you agree that from 1995 to the present there has been no statistically-significant global warming

    Yes, but only just. […]

    G – There is a debate over whether the Medieval Warm Period (MWP) was global or not. If it were to be conclusively shown that it was a global phenomenon, would you accept that this would undermine the premise that mean surface atmospheric temperatures during the latter part of the 20th Century were unprecedented?

    There is much debate over whether the Medieval Warm Period was global in extent or not. The MWP is most clearly expressed in parts of North America, the North Atlantic and Europe and parts of Asia. For it to be global in extent the MWP would need to be seen clearly in more records from the tropical regions and the Southern Hemisphere. There are very few palaeoclimatic records for these latter two regions.

    Of course, if the MWP was shown to be global in extent and as warm or warmer than today (based on an equivalent coverage over the NH and SH) then obviously the late-20th century warmth would not be unprecedented. On the other hand, if the MWP was global, but was less warm that today, then current warmth would be unprecedented.

    We know from the instrumental temperature record that the two hemispheres do not always follow one another. We cannot, therefore, make the assumption that temperatures in the global average will be similar to those in the northern hemisphere.

    Now comes the part of the Q&A many will find most interesting:

    K – How much faith do you have – and should we have – in the Yamal tree ring data from Siberia? Should we trust the science behind the palaeoclimate record?

    First, we would all accept that palaeoclimatic data are considerably less certain than the instrumental data. However, we must use what data are available in order to look at the last 1,000 years.

    I believe that our current interpretation of the Yamal tree-ring data in Siberia is sound. Yamal is just one series that enters some of the millennial long reconstructions that are available.

    The current interpretation of the tree-ring data is “sound.” Yet, Jones earlier said (emphasis added), “There is still much that needs to be undertaken to reduce uncertainties, not just for the future, but for the instrumental (and especially the palaeoclimatic) past as well.”

    Q – Let’s talk about the e-mails now: In the e-mails you refer to a “trick” which your critics say suggests you conspired to trick the public? You also mentioned “hiding the decline” (in temperatures). Why did you say these things?

    This remark has nothing to do with any “decline” in observed instrumental temperatures. The remark referred to a well-known observation, in a particular set of tree-ring data, that I had used in a figure to represent large-scale summer temperature changes over the last 600 years.

    The phrase ‘hide the decline’ was shorthand for providing a composite representation of long-term temperature changes made up of recent instrumental data and earlier tree-ring based evidence, where it was absolutely necessary to remove the incorrect impression given by the tree rings that temperatures between about 1960 and 1999 (when the email was written) were not rising, as our instrumental data clearly showed they were.

    This “divergence” is well known in the tree-ring literature and “trick” did not refer to any intention to deceive – but rather “a convenient way of achieving something”, in this case joining the earlier valid part of the tree-ring record with the recent, more reliable instrumental record.

    I was justified in curtailing the tree-ring reconstruction in the mid-20th Century because these particular data were not valid after that time – an issue which was later directly discussed in the 2007 IPCC AR4 Report.

    This is important, for most people still don’t understand what the decline they were trying to hide was.

    As Marc Sheppard wrote in December, “[T]he decline Jones so urgently sought to hide was not one of measured temperatures at all, but rather figures infinitely more important to climate alarmists — those determined by proxy reconstructions.” He continued:

    Jones was working on a cover chart for a forthcoming World Meteorological Organization report [PDF], “WMO Statement on the Status of the Global Climate in 1990,” when he wrote the e-mail. As the graph would incorporate one reconstruction of his own plus one each from Michael Mann and Keith Briffa, Jones was informing them that he had used the trick on Mann’s series at the same 1980 cutoff as MBH98, but found it necessary to use 1960 as the cutoff on the Briffa series.

    Now, Jones has admitted this to the BBC: “[It] was absolutely necessary to remove the incorrect impression given by the tree rings that temperatures between about 1960 and 1999 (when the email was written) were not rising, as our instrumental data clearly showed they were.”

    In simple terms, Briffa’s tree-ring data showed a decline in temperatures between 1960 and 1999 that weather stations around the world disagreed with. So, Jones spliced into Briffa’s data set the real “instrumental” numbers for that period thereby hiding the decline.

    This should raise eyebrows for a number of reasons. First, Jones and Company gave no notification to folks receiving this data — including the Intergovernmental Panel and Climate Change — that Briffa’s numbers included instrumental data.

    But more importantly, as the tree-ring numbers deviated so demonstrably from the observed temperature data between 1960 and 1999, why should anyone believe they’re accurate for any periods in the past that can’t be confirmed with instrumentation?

    The entire global warming myth depends on tree-ring data that was grossly errant for forty years in the last century. This makes the decline ClimateGate scientists were trying to hide FAR MORE serious than most people believe.

    Moving backward in the Q&A, there was another issue addressed by the BBC readers will find interesting:

    N – When scientists say “the debate on climate change is over”, what exactly do they mean – and what don’t they mean?

    It would be supposition on my behalf to know whether all scientists who say the debate is over are saying that for the same reason. I don’t believe the vast majority of climate scientists think this. This is not my view. There is still much that needs to be undertaken to reduce uncertainties, not just for the future, but for the instrumental (and especially the palaeoclimatic) past as well.

    So, the scientist at the heart of the ClimateGate scandal doesn’t think the debate is over.

    Given what he’s now confirmed about significant flaws in the tree-ring data, the only thing surprising is that he’d admit it.

    Are you listening Mr. Gore?

    Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters

    Read more Great Articles at

    Filed under: America (USA), Blundering Bureaucrats, Climate Alarmists, Climate Change, Environment, Environmental activists, Fanatics, Fear-mongering, Fraud/Waste, Global Warming, Great Britain, Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Propaganda, Public Opinion, U.K. Tagged: Climate Change Fraud, Climate Change Religion, Climategate, Global Warming Alarmism, Global Warming Hype, Medieval Warm Period, NewsBusters, Phil Jones, Tony, UK Climatic Research Institute (CRU), UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

  • Rumblings From Mother Earth

    By Alan CarubaVolcano Eruption

    As I predicted, news from Haiti in the wake of the Jan 12 earthquake that leveled Port-au- Prince has become a trickle. Even a catastrophe of such proportions, thousands dead, a city in ruins, et cetera, does not hold the world’s attention for long, but a month later, on February 11, a 4.3 magnitude earthquake hit Chicago and there was barely any notice taken in the mainstream media.

    As February began, The New York Times took notice that, “Hundreds of Quakes Are Rattling Yellowstone.” My first instinct was (and is) to dismiss the Times as a source of science-based information. This is the same newspaper that, a few years back, declared that the North Pole was melting and, of course, it continues to publish utter nonsense about a non-existent “global warming.”

    To his credit, reporter Kirk Johnson put the Yellowstone activity in context, noting that the second-largest ever recorded swarm of quakes “is more a cause for curiosity than alarm.” In fact, another swarm of more than 1,000 quakes had struck the park just over a year ago with the largest recorded occurring in 1985; over a three month period, there were 3,000 earthquakes.

    All the quakes noted, however, are way down on the Richter scale, barely felt and noticed thanks only to sophisticated seismic detection equipment. In total, the February swarm was the 80th in the last fifteen years. Yellowstone, however, is special because it is the largest volcanic caldera in the United States and, should it erupt, the destruction would be unimaginable. Like Mount Pinatubo in the Philippines, it could fill the atmosphere with so much material that it would likely alter the weather around the world for a while.

    One, however, has to ask if there is a connection between Haiti, Chicago, and Yellowstone’s rumblings. Clearly there is movement of the Earth’s tectonic plates and it is occurring in our neighborhood.

    We have been told for years that the San Andreas Fault is likely to deliver “a big one” again to San Francisco or Los Angeles, but it is the nature of people to push such things to the back of their minds and perhaps that is the best thing to do. No one can truly “prepare” for an earthquake.

    There are, however, magnitudes of disaster. My friend, Robert W. Felix, author of books on the coming ice age and about magnetic reversals when the magnetic poles reverse—-your compass would point south instead of north—-says “I do know that smaller eruptions have occurred in sync with magnetic reversals and in sync with the beginning of previous ice ages.”

    A magnetic reversal occurs when the protective magnetic field around the planet has a precipitous decline in field strength. “And since our magnetic field strength has declined by two-thirds during the past 2,000 years,” says Felix, “the rate of decline has been speeding up.” (Check out his website at www.iceagenow)

    Despite the greatest hoax of the modern era, “global warming”, Earth has entered yet another cooling cycle that could last a decade or two, maybe longer. The planet is at the end of an interglacial period of 11,500 years and is due a new ice age. Maybe not tomorrow or next week, but the science says it is inevitable.

    When you put together an increase in volcanic activity, a decline in the magnetic field strength of the planet, and the approach of a new ice age, it suggests that life as we know it on Earth is going to become a far bigger problem for all species.

    All these rumblings are telling us something.

    Alan Caruba writes a daily post at Warning Signs. A business and science writer, he is the founder of The National Anxiety Center.

    Read more thought provoking articles at Warning Signs

    Filed under: America (USA), Climate Alarmists, Climate Change, Environment, Environmental activists, Fanatics, Fear-mongering, Fraud/Waste, Global Warming, Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Media Mind Manipulators, MSM (Main Stream Media) Liberal, Muddled Media, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Pseudo-Journalism, Public Opinion Tagged: Alan Caruba, Climate Change Religion, Earthquakes, Global Warming Alarmism, Global Warming Hype, Haiti Earthquake, Tony, Warning Signs, Yellowstone

  • Blizzard Of Lies II: Global Warming Snow In Dallas Shatters Record

    By Noel Sheppard

    As my colleague Mark Finkelstein reported Friday, global warming-obsessed media have been hysterically blaming this year’s record snowstorms on climate change under the theory that Al Gore’s favorite myth will increase moisture in the atmosphere thereby raising the amount of the white stuff falling from the sky.

    As Finkelstein pointed out, the problem with this postulate is that this season’s storms in our nation’s capital all occurred on abnormally cold days.

    Another case in point: Dallas, Texas, has just seen the greatest 24-hour snow total in the city’s history with temperatures nearly 20 degrees below normal (picture courtesy Story Balloon):

    Large, fluffy snowflakes fell heavily across North Texas for about 24 hours Thursday, bringing record snowfall that sailed past the previous all-time one-day record.

    A new record of 12.5 inches of snow in a 24-hour period was set at Dallas/Fort Worth International Airport (11.2 on Thursday) — and flakes were still coming down after midnight. The previous daily record was 7.8 inches on Jan. 15, 1964, and Jan. 14, 1917 and the previous 24-hour record was 12.1 inches.

    Why did it snow instead of rain? According to the Star-Telegram:

    The ingredients for a snowy season are simple: multiple upper-level storm systems supported by temperatures low enough to turn moisture to snow.

    Those two elements have collided more than once over North Texas this season.

    “It’s definitely one of those winters,” said Bill Bunting, a meteorologist with the weather service. “You never really know when you’ll get one.”

    If temperatures in this region had been at their norm for this time of year, all this extra moisture would have fallen as rain. The average temperature in Dallas on February 11 is 50 degrees. The average low is 40. Temperatures in Dallas are forecast to continue to be abnormally low the rest of the week.

    As such, Dallas just go pummeled with snow because it was too cold to rain as it normally would have this time of year.

    And therein lies one of the lies concerning this issue: if global warming is increasing moisture in the atmosphere AND temperatures, parts of the globe that RARELY see snow shouldn’t suddenly be seeing more than they ever have.

    Certainly, the coldest parts of the planet that experience greater amounts of moisture will see more snow if the alarmists are correct.

    But America’s deep south setting snowfall records as the planet is supposedly warming defies anything approaching logic – unless of course you’re a journalist tied to Al Gore’s hip.

    Noel Sheppard is the Associate Editor of NewsBusters

    Read more Great Articles at

    Filed under: America (USA), Climate Alarmists, Climate Change, Environment, Environmental activists, Fanatics, Fear-mongering, Fraud/Waste, Global Warming, Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Media Mind Manipulators, Muddled Media, Propaganda, Pseudo-Journalism, Public Opinion Tagged: Climate Change Fraud, Climate Change Religion, Dallas Snow, Global Warming Alarmism, Global Warming Hype, NewsBusters, Snowmageddon, Snowpocalypse

  • But, But, But…

    By Andrew Bolt

    Shore-ly some mistake:

    New Paper in Science: Sea level 81,000 years ago was 1 meter higher while CO2 was lower

    Meanwhile, the BBC does what the ABC still refuses to contemplate – and that’s to hold the alarmists to account. Andrew Neil goes for the throat of former IPCC chairman Robert Watson:

    The greatest scientific scandal of our lifetime is unravelling before our eyes, and the (Australian) ABC has to be dragged screaming to even notice. Don’t forget, the reason this scandal grew so monstrous was that the media refused for years to even question the deeply questionable. This has been a media scandal as well.

    Andrew Bolt is a journalist and columnist writing for The Herald Sun in Melbourne Victoria Australia.

    Read more excellent articles from Andrew Bolt’s Blog

    Filed under: Blundering Bureaucrats, Climate Alarmists, Climate Change, Environment, Environmental activists, Europe, Fanatics, Fear-mongering, Fraud/Waste, Global Warming, Great Britain, Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Media Mind Manipulators, MSM (Main Stream Media) Liberal, Muddled Media, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Pseudo-Journalism, Public Opinion, U.K., U.N. – United Nations (United Nitwits) Tagged: Andrew Bolt, Climate Change Fraud, Climate Change Religion, Climategate, Global Warming Alarmism, Global Warming Hype, Tony, UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)

  • Gender: Optional

    By Nancy Morgan

    TonyfromOz prefaces …..

    Just what is the World coming to?

    Joseph Romero, a 6 year-old Arizona boy, was  diagnosed as transgender last October and is beginning his/her transition to becoming a female. When he/she reaches the age of 12, he will be given female hormones containing estrogen and plans to undergo surgery when she is an adult in order to become a full woman.

    In the UK last September, a 12 year-old boy turned up at school as a girl. Over the summer holidays his parents changed his name to a female one and allowed him to don female garb and wear his hair in pigtails. The youngster is now preparing to undergo hormone treatment and surgery – and could become the world’s youngest sex-swap patient in the coming years. His school has graciously provided him/her a separate toilet and changing room.

    Here in the U.S., the IRS ruled earlier this month that a Massachusetts woman should be allowed to deduct the costs of her sex-change operation. And in Portland, Oregon, there is a move afoot to have the city pay for the sex-change operations of any employees that decide they are unhappy with their gender.

    Hollywood is firmly on board, as they plan a new film about the world’s first post-operative transsexual, starring heavyweights Nicole Kidman and Gwyneth Paltrow.

    Over in Italy, the first prison for transsexuals is now open for business.

    These cases represent the tip of the iceburg in the growing movement to make gender optional. When coupled with increasingly successful campaign to legitimize same sex unions via gay marriage, the result is an all out assault on the centuries old concepts of family and marriage.

    Consider: On September 4, 1969, California Governor Ronald Reagan signed into law the nation’s first no-fault divorce law. California legislators made the case for no-fault divorce with the valid argument that no-fault divorce would remedy some very desperate situations. A woman who desired a family married to a man in an insane asylum, for example. Who wouldn’t want to make her case an exception? Who wouldn’t allow this woman legal divorce from a marriage that had ceased functioning? No-fault divorce was enacted to address these untenable situations. It was intended to address the exception, but instead, quickly became the rule.

    No-fault divorce quickly spread across the United States. By 1985, all states had enacted no-fault divorce legislation except for New York. This policy, enacted in good faith, weakened the concept of family to the point where divorce is now the norm, not the exception.

    A case can be made that the push to redefine gender roles and broaden marriage to include gays also has the potential of becoming the new norm. And while the very few legitimate cases of genuine gender confusion are indeed heart wrenching, the re-structuring of our society to accommodate them will very likely result in the destruction of traditional family and marriage.

    Traditional families are the bedrock upon which our culture and society are based. And marriage is the glue that binds these families together. With twin assaults from the left on these institutions, America is facing the very real possibility of a radical reformation. A reformation that is based on the needs of a few at the expense of the majority. A reformation that has the potential to destroy two of America’s most basic and trusted institutions.

    The left is unrelenting in its desire to redefine society. Billing themselves as champions of the oppressed, the left has made significant progress in labeling anyone who disagrees with their agenda as being motivated by hate and ignorance. Genuine objections based on faith, history, common sense and morality are ignored as the left focuses the debate on the plight of the ‘victim.’ It is a successful, proven political strategy. After all, as David Horowitz points out, “The appeal to help the underdog and defend the victims resonates with all Americans.”

    The left has attained the moral high ground in this cultural battle. And they will continue to maintain it as long as the focus is on the supposed ‘victims’ and not on some very basic questions that are being left out of the equation. Namely: At what cost?

    Do the feelings of the minority of gays and transsexuals trump the rights of the majority of heterosexuals? Do the feelings of 6 year-old Joseph Romero, oops, Josie Romero warrant blurring the gender roles of all citizens? Do the desires of gay couples to attain social legitimacy warrant the destruction through redefinition of the centuries old tradition of marriage? And finally, who will pay the very real costs when these social experiments fail?

    These are questions that need to be addressed before the left succeeds in fashioning their brave new world. A world that caters to the feelings of the few at the expense of everyone else. A world where fealty to God and family would be replaced by political correctness and transient social experiments. A world where traditional family and marriage are considered moot and America turns into one country under men instead of God.

    Pandora’s Box has been opened. It remains to be seen if we can close it. Drip, drip, drip.

    Nancy Morgan is a columnist and news editor for RightBias.com and she lives in South Carolina.

    Read more from Nancy Morgan at Right Bias

    Filed under: America (USA), Blundering Bureaucrats, Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Politically Correct, Politics, Propaganda, Public Opinion Tagged: Liberal Thinking, Liberal Values, Right Bias (Nancy Morgan), Tony, Traditional Families, Transgender, Transsexuals

  • Political Bipartisanship, Nuclear Iran, And More Political Comment

    Digest

    The Foundation

    A winning message for Republicans

    “The essence of Government is power; and power, lodged as it must be in human hands, will ever be liable to abuse.” –James Madison

    Government & Politics

    A ‘Party of No’ Could Get ‘Yes’ Votes in November

    In a Super Bowl pre-game interview, Barack Obama announced that he wants to have a televised meeting with both Republicans and Democrats to discuss ideas about crafting health care legislation. Imagine that — an open debate with both parties equally represented, hashing out plans and crafting a bill using the best ideas brought to the table. In 2008, Candidate Obama told us that was how health care reform would come to pass in his new bipartisan and transparent Washington. The reality has been far different, though entirely predictable to those who recognized him for what he is: a socialist.

    Legislation was crafted not to reform health care, but to put it solely under government control. Deals were made behind closed doors, and yet, even with bulletproof majorities in both chambers, the Democrat Congress has not passed a health care bill.

    Now Obama is pretending to play the role of peacemaker, but he views bipartisanship as Republicans submitting to his will. Indeed, he won’t agree to scrap the existing legislation and start from scratch, even though the public has made its distaste for the bills quite clear.

    House Minority Leader John Boehner has made dropping the current legislation a prerequisite for Republicans to come to the table. It is, after all, a waste of time to debate a bill that’s essentially dead. Republicans want to cut costs while Democrats want a health insurance entitlement for all. Both sides want to prevent insurance companies from rejecting ill customers, but Democrats, beholden to trial lawyers, reject the common-sense cost-cutting idea of tort reform, among other free-market measures. Unfortunately, neither side is talking about the constitutional role of government.

    Even if the meeting happens, both sides are so deeply entrenched that a compromise is rather unlikely. Besides, Obama may be trying to set a political trap of sorts for Republicans by wooing them to the table, offering them a bad deal, then once again accusing them of being “The Party of No,” that mantra so often repeated by his accomplices in the Leftmedia.

    Such a label wouldn’t be bad, however, considering that the alternative means going along with a plan that would raise taxes, remove competition in the insurance industry, drive down the quality of health care in our country, and add hundreds of billions — if not trillions — of dollars to the national debt.

    In fact, when combined with advocating fiscal responsibility and constitutional Rule of Law, “Just Say No to Socialism” sounds like a winning formula for Republicans come November. Of course, the GOP would have to awaken from its stupor first.

    RIP: Rep. Jack Murtha, the Marine Corpse

    On Monday, longtime Pennsylvania Democrat Congressman John Murtha died after complications arising from gallbladder surgery. He was 77.

    The Leftmedia headlined his obituaries “U.S. Representative Murtha, Supporter of Troops, Dies at Age 77” and “Pa. Dem Murtha remembered as military advocate.” Given his actual history, however, this is the sort of revisionism that was heaped upon the citizens of Oceania in George Orwell’s “1984″: “We’ve always been at war with Eastasia.”

    While many lauded the head of the House defense appropriations subcommittee as a “staunch supporter of the military,” he’s better known in military circles for his blindly partisan criticism of the Long War and his hasty indictment of eight fellow Marines for supposedly “murdering” innocent civilians “in cold blood” in Haditha, Iraq. (All but one of the defendants have been cleared or had charges dropped; the other is awaiting court-martial.) While Murtha may have had legitimate questions about the tactics used to fight the enemy in Iraq, many took offense at his characterization of our military as cold-blooded killers.

    The press conveniently forgets this and other transgressions, such as the ABSCAM scandal of the 1980s, in which Murtha escaped indictment by the skin of his teeth, or, more accurately, by the “D” after his name. The Leftmedia focused instead on his early military life and perceived service to his district by securing dozens of earmarks for projects there.

    While we praise Murtha’s personal service to the Marine Corps (or as the commander in chief would say, “Marine Corpse”), which spanned nearly four decades on active duty and as a reservist, we cannot condone his behavior once he went from serving his country on the field of battle to representing his district and nation in the halls of Congress. Too often did he epitomize the “culture of corruption” that his good friend Nancy Pelosi hypocritically opposed.

    History is a harsh judge when men of character falter. A life which was devoted to service fell into one which was merely self-serving, and Marines everywhere must be saddened that one of their own met his Maker without recanting those false accusations against eight of his brothers.

    New & Notable Legislation

    Senate Democrats had hoped to offer President Obama a legislative victory with an $80 billion “jobs bill,” otherwise known as “Stimulus II” (or is it III, IV or V?). But Thursday, they dropped the bill in favor of a leaner version without unrelated pork. The centerpiece is still $13 billion to exempt companies from Social Security payroll taxes for previously unemployed new hires in 2010. Other incentives include renewing expired business tax credits, extending unemployment benefits, and suspending a cut in Medicare payments to physicians. The White House is predicting growth of 95,000 jobs per month in 2010, but not even the Associated Press buys that. The AP notes the obvious: “[C]ompanies are unlikely to hire workers just to receive a tax break.” Besides, after hiding the loss of over 800,000 additional jobs in 2009, who can trust any figures that these elitists produce?

    Blue Dog Democrats plan to propose a bill that will cap discretionary spending at specific levels, going further than the president’s anemic $250 billion decade-long non-discretionary spending freeze. The sheer size of the Blue Dog coalition — 54 House Democrats — means that whatever proposal they come up with will have to be given serious consideration by the majority.

    A bill by Rep. Peter King (R-NY) to prevent federal funding for civilian trials of Guantanamo Bay detainees in civilian courts is picking up steam. Sixteen Republican and two Democrat cosponsors have joined King, and he is confident the bill will pass if it is brought to a floor vote. Beyond the House bill, both U.S. senators from New York, the New York City mayor, police commissioner, and the state Senate have voiced opposition to holding the 9/11 terror trials in Manhattan.

    Tea Party National Convention

    Tea Partiers once again sailed into a sea of controversy last week as more than 600 people from around the country attended the first “National Tea Party Convention” held at the landlocked Gaylord Opryland Hotel & Convention Center in Nashville. The event culminated with more than 1,100 people enjoying a keynote dinner speech by former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin, which was also broadcast around the country on cable.

    You might think that the storm was due to mainstream media’s vulgar derision of attendees as “tea baggers” or the tamer “Astroturfers” — but you would be wrong. Larger issues seemed to erupt concerning sponsor Judson Phillips and his for-profit Tea Party Nation, the location, ticket fees, hotel rates, travel costs, Sarah Palin, her purported speaker’s fee, the colors of the tablecloths and napkins, and just about everything else.

    While the event may not have represented all Tea Party organizations as the convention title might suggest, it’s difficult for us to take seriously the disparagement that ensued over like-minded people exercising their right to assemble peaceably, freely paying the known costs (nothing hidden, except the hotel and gasoline taxes) and enlightening themselves with whatever the conference offered.

    Skepticism, especially in politics, is healthy, but contempt is not. This hullabaloo over a sold-out conference of willing participants had all the hallmarks of Leftmedia agitation.

    The Tea Party is the mother of all big-tent movements. There is plenty of room, and need, for Tea Partiers of all stripes and in all places — including those willing to fork over big bucks for a weekend confab. However, to be most effective, we must all remain focused on the fact that the Rule of Law is being usurped by the rule of men, and we must each play our part to work diligently at electing honorable representatives to replace the current hegemony in Washington.

    National Security

    Countdown to Nuclear Iran

    On Thursday, Iranian Wing-Nut-in-Chief Mahmoud Ahmadinejad announced that Iran had enriched uranium to 20 percent and could, if it wishes, enrich to 80 percent. During remarks in Tehran amid the celebrations surrounding Revolution Day, Ahmadinejad also claimed Iran would soon greatly increase its production of 3.5 percent enriched uranium.

    Ahmadinejad’s defiant claim came just days after U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates stated that the “only path left” is more diplomacy and more sanctions to force Iran into compliance with its Non-Proliferation Treaty obligations. Gates went on to opine, “If the international community will stand together and bring pressure on the Iranian government, I believe there is still time for sanctions and pressure to work. But we must all work together.”

    Apparently Secretary Gates missed the memo regarding the five existing UN Security Council Resolutions urging Iran to desist from making nukes; also Iran’s kidnapping of 15 British sailors and marines, Iran’s Revolutionary Guard being officially listed as a terrorist organization, Iran’s providing anti-ship missiles and long-range rockets to Hezbollah, Iran’s providing explosively formed penetrators and shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles to al-Qa’ida in Iraq, Iran’s providing weapons and training to Taliban fighters in Afghanistan, Iran’s secret nuclear facility at Qom, Iran’s attempted shipment of arms to Hamas onboard the merchant ship FRANCOP intercepted by Israel, Iran’s blatantly fraudulent election last June, Iran’s receipt of Russian SA-15b surface-to-air missile system and rumored receipt of the even more capable SA-20, Iran’s numerous ballistic missile launches, the hundreds of statements by Iranian leaders that they will never give in to outside pressure, and, finally, China’s continued veiled threats to veto any further sanctions against Iran.

    All of these and more occurred during the previous six and a half years of “bringing pressure on the Iranian government,” a period in which the “international community” most assuredly did not work together. Why in the world would Gates think things will be different now, especially after Obama spent his first year in office bowing to every foreign leader on the planet?

    Iran’s pursuit of nuclear weapons will not be stopped by UN talk or the “international community.” It will be stopped only by American resolve, or perhaps Israeli resolve, though we have wasted nearly seven years so far.

    Department of Military Readiness: Missiles in Romania

    Romanian President Trian Basescu recently announced approval of U.S. plans to install missile defense sites in his country aimed at thwarting potential Iranian missile threats. Our readers may recall that Barack Obama reversed earlier agreements to site defensive missiles in Poland and the Czech Republic as a worthless gesture to Russian President Putin. The Russian response was less than encouraging to our EU allies, and in a surprising (and dare we say encouraging) turn of events, Obama’s DOD has now agreed to a four-phased defensive missile plan for Romania and the region.

    Such a plan should be seen as less intrusive to Russian ballistic missile capability and would actually improve response times to any Iranian missile launch. Naturally, however, Moscow still doesn’t see it that way and has raised new veiled threats concerning the future of any new START talks and perhaps even our agreements over Black Sea deployments of Aegis cruisers.

    How Obama responds to this renewed Russian intransigence will be interesting to watch, especially in light of recent news from Iran. Russian threats worked once. Any more such about-faces will surely decrease our EU allies’ reliance on U.S. security assurances and may even lead to an unwanted rapprochement with Russia by some of the former Soviet states. Stick to a good plan, Mr. President.

    This Week’s ‘Braying Jackass’ Award

    “I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration.” –Vice President Joe Biden

    Which administration, exactly?

    Army to Punish Hasan’s Superiors

    “The military will formally discipline at least six officers, mostly from Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, for failing to take action against the officer accused of carrying out last year’s deadly shooting rampage at Fort Hood,” reports The Wall Street Journal. After Maj. Nidal Hasan opened fire at Fort Hood in November, killing 14 (including an unborn child), the Army began an investigation of Hasan’s superiors. As many as eight of his senior officers could face censure for failure to report his Islamist radicalization. Letters of reprimand would effectively end their careers. Unfortunately, 14 people died due to politically correct negligence. No letter can change that.

    ‘Reasonable Expectation of Privacy’

    The Obama administration has argued that Americans don’t enjoy a “reasonable expectation of privacy” when it comes to their whereabouts as revealed by their cell phones, and therefore warrant-less tapping is allowed. Read more.

    Profiles of Valor: WWII Vet Louis Stamatakos

    On Feb. 28, 1945, Louis Stamatakos saved a B17 Flying Fortress crew from sure disaster in the skies over Germany. The 19-year-old from Dayton, Ohio, was trained as a tail gunner and survived 31 missions over Europe with the 8th Air Force, which flew out of England. While bombing railroad yards in Kassel, Germany, on his 23rd mission, two 250-pound bombs failed to drop. One was stuck by a single shackle and the other by both shackles. “Everyone went crazy when they heard that,” Stamatakos said, “and then somebody said, ‘Hey, get the Greek, he’s been going to armament school.’ I took a look and said, ‘Well, maybe I can break them loose.’”

    Break them loose he did — with a short-handled fire ax. The wind had spun a small propeller on the nose of one bomb, which armed it and meant one false move would detonate it. At 20,000 feet and 20 below zero, Stamatakos kept swinging until the shackles released both bombs. “That’s back when I was young and dumb,” said Stamatakos. Crewmate Richard Rainoldi, a retired Air Force colonel, said, “If he hadn’t done it, it was either bailing out or blowing up.”

    Stamatakos’s three sons were so impressed with their dad’s story that they tracked down Rainoldi, who had been the plane’s navigator, and he gave a sworn statement that was delivered to the Army. On Christmas Eve, 2009, Stamatakos, now a retired Michigan State University professor, received a letter from the Department of the Army saying he would be awarded the Silver Star in a ceremony on Feb. 17 at Michigan’s state capitol in Lansing.

    Business & Economy

    Income Redistribution: Expect to Fail if You Plan to Fail

    Leftists consistently deny that raising taxes harms the economy, insisting instead that higher taxes and draconian government regulations boost the economy. This, of course, runs contrary to the actual outcome that the tax-and-regulate approach has incurred every time it’s been tried.

    The Laffer curve — the theory that reducing tax rates causes economic growth and a corresponding growth in overall government taxation revenues — and supply-side economics inspired the Reagan tax cuts of 1981, which significantly lowered the Carter administration’s high tax rates and sparked an unprecedented 25 years of economic prosperity. Counterintuitive though it might be for liberals, these cuts generated higher tax revenues for the federal government by increasing overall economic activity and growth.

    The Obama administration is being forced to face these previously established hard truths. The Congressional Budget Office forecast in August that 2010 tax collections would bring in $2.264 trillion. Only the government has grown over the last year, however, not the economy. Therefore, tax revenues are down and, this week, the CBO revised its estimate down to $2.175 trillion.

    Sadly, the Obama administration’s insanity continues with its willful ignorance of the third prong necessary for economic growth, which is a reduction of government spending. So long as overspending, high-taxing and over-regulating leftists are in power, the economy will suffer.

    Recession Continues, But Salaries Skyrocket

    There’s good news and bad news. The (seemingly) good news is that the number of six-figure salaries is rising — skyrocketing, actually. The bad news is that you’re footing the bill. According to an analysis by USA Today, the number of federal workers making $100,000 or more has risen from 14 percent to 19 percent since the start of the recession. At the end of 2007, 1,868 civilian Defense Department employees made $150,000 or more. By June 2009, the number was 10,100. Spikes in the Transportation Department were even more shocking, with the number of employees making $170,000 or more growing from one — yes, one — to 1,690.

    Jessica Klement, government affairs director for the Federal Managers Association, says the high skill level of government workers such as scientists and physicians is the reason for the high pay, and she claims federal salaries are actually 26 percent below private-sector salaries for equivalent jobs. Yet, USA Today’s study of the more than two million federal employees found their average salary stands at $71,206, while average private-sector pay is only $40,331. Surely, not all the nation’s best and brightest work for Uncle Sam.

    USA Today names pay hikes and a new merit-based raise system for Defense workers as among the chief culprits for the rising salaries. Still, as Congressman Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) notes, “There’s no way to justify this to the American people. It’s ridiculous.” With 7.3 million private-sector jobs lost, “ridiculous” is an understatement.

    This Week’s ‘Alpha Jackass’ Award

    “The small businesses I’ve talked to — and I’ve been talking to a lot of them as I have been traveling around the country — their biggest problem is right now they can’t get credit out of their banks, so they’re uncertain about that, and they’re still uncertain about orders. You know, do they just have enough customers to justify them doing more? It’s looking better at this point, but that’s not the rationale for people saying I’m not hiring. Let me put it this way: Most small businesses right now, if they’ve got enough customers to make a profit and they can get the bank loans required to boost their payroll, boost their inventory and sell to those customers, they will do so.” –Barack Obama, the man who has never even had a job in the private sector, much less had to meet payroll

    Wall Street Rethinks Democrat Support

    Previously a sure source of campaign cash for Democrats, Wall Street political dollars are making a U-turn. According to the Center for Responsive Politics, 2008 saw the record-breaking sum of $89 million flow from the securities and investment industry to Democrats. Now, the New York Times reports one-time Democrat supporters are writing checks to the other side in protest of the president’s regulatory rampage.

    “The expectation in Washington is that ‘We can kick you around, and you are still going to give us money,’” noted one Wall Street leader. “We are not going to play that game anymore.” Democrat Thomas R. Nides — an executive at Morgan Stanley, chairman of the Securities and Financial Markets Association and self-proclaimed Obama fan — was more blunt: “[E]ven if you are a big fan, when you are the piñata at the party, it doesn’t really feel good.”

    Indeed, since taking office, Obama has put a bull’s-eye on Wall Street banks, calling for salary caps, proposing “proprietary trading” limits, and recommending a “financial crisis responsibility fee” (a.k.a. tax) on the largest banks. Graciously, though, the president said recently that he doesn’t “begrudge” multi-million dollar bonuses for Wall Street Execs Jamie Dimon or Lloyd Blankfein, both of whom are big Democrat donors.

    Despite private loyalties and past contributions, when it comes to drawing dough from Wall Street executives, Democrats are beginning to find roadblocks where once the path was clear.

    When Reassurance Isn’t Reassuring

    “Absolutely not” — “That will never happen in this country.” So said tax cheat Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner when asked whether the United States is at risk of losing its AAA debt rating in light of the projected $1.6 trillion budget deficit for 2010. Apparently, Geithner thinks himself wiser than Moody’s Investors Service, which recently indicated the government’s rating will suffer unless action is taken to cut projected budget deficits. Unfortunately, Geithner also opposes cutting spending, as he believes it could harm the economy.

    Culture & Policy

    Climate Change This Week: Blizzard Disrupts Bureaucracy

    The Obama administration announced this week that it will unveil yet another bureaucratic brainchild: another new agency to study and disperse information about climate change to both the public and policy makers. Interestingly enough, the press conference announcing the agency was disrupted by the blizzard in Washington, DC, and had to be conducted via telephone.

    The agency, which will be headquartered in DC, will have six directors throughout the country and will work with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. NOAA head Jane Lubchenco claims that its creation is crucial to making informed decisions regarding wind power, fishing industries and coastal community planning. But NOAA is known to be in the tank for envirofascists, and there is little reason to believe that this information will be accurate.

    There is humor to be found in almost any situation, however, and Republican Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) certainly found it in the snow-covered streets of Washington. He and his family used some of the 32 inches of snow that fell on the city to make an igloo. The structure, placed strategically near the Capitol, was then fitted with a sign reading “Al Gore’s New Home.”

    Meanwhile, the Department of Public Works is running out of places to put the snow, settling on an empty parking lot at the edge of town where they’re building a “snow mountain.” How appropriate — things have been piling higher and deeper in the Swamp for some time now.

    Naturally, warmists such as those at Time magazine are blaming global warming for the snow, though they correctly point out that “Weather is what will happen next weekend; climate is what will happen over the next decades and centuries.” But then, curiously, the mag admits that “while our ability to predict the former has become reasonably reliable, scientists are still a long way from being able to make accurate projections about the future of the global climate.” And here we thought it was settled science.

    Wall Street Journal columnist James Taranto concludes, “It’s true that cold weather, while providing an occasion to mock global warming, does not disprove it. But the mocking would be far less effective had global warmists not spent the past quarter-century making a mockery of the scientific method.”

    Around the World: Missionaries Charged With ‘Kidnapping’

    It’s always nice when governments have their priorities in order, especially in the wake of a devastating tragedy. The Haitian government has made theirs perfectly clear — it is more important to prosecute those participating in the relief effort than to save their own citizens.

    After the Jan. 12 earthquake, people around the world stepped in to help. The United States (as usual) led the charge, both through government aid and contributions of time and money by private citizens. Ten Baptist missionaries were among them, risking their own lives to travel to Haiti and pitch in. On Jan. 29, these same missionaries were arrested and charged with kidnapping — despite their claim to have had the necessary papers in order — after they tried to bring 33 Haitian orphans across the border into the Dominican Republic. There, the missionaries told authorities, the children would have been placed in another orphanage better equipped to deal with their needs.

    When the attorneys for the “Baptist 10″ wrote to Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton, asking for her intervention on their behalf, Clinton’s icy response demonstrated precisely where her priorities are — or more accurately, are not. “Obviously,” Clinton remarked, “this is a matter for the Haitian judicial system.”

    The State Department has turned a blind eye to the missionaries’ fate (if convicted, they could spend the rest of their lives in a Haitian jail), stating that it would be “highly unusual” for the secretary of state to become involved. Americans traveling to other countries to serve the cause of humanity are now aware that their efforts may be met with similar mindless cruelty, their plight with a similar cold shoulder.

    At the end of the day, the injustice being committed by the Haitian government, coupled with the lack of interest and incompetence of our own, is only going to hurt the Haitians and others suffering hardships around the world.

    From the ‘Non Compos Mentis’ File

    As usual, the Super Bowl ads have everyone talking. Two in particular are worth noting: Pam Tebow sharing her story about choosing life for her son Tim versus an abortion, and the creepy Green Police ad for the Audi A3 TDI. Read more at PatriotPost.US.

    To Keep and Bear Arms

    As Matthew Alan Clinage and Christopher Polson attempted to steal battery packs from a golf cart in the wee hours of the morning, 70 year-old property owner Robert Rowley in Winter Haven, Florida heard his motion sensor alarm sound. Rowley immediately took his handgun and flashlight outside to evaluate the situation. When he saw the two men, both in their early-20’s, he asked them to leave, but one of the suspects began approaching him. In an attempt to scare away the thieves, Rowley fired a shot into the air, the ground, and the suspect’s truck as they tried to escape. He was unaware that the bullets had hit the suspects, but the two soon showed up at a local hospital with gunshot wounds.

    Clinage was taken to jail after treatment; Polson remains in a hospital and will be taken to jail once he is released. Both were charged with grand theft and burglary of an occupied residence, while Clinage was also charged with violation of community control due to a prior conviction of grand theft of a firearm.

    And Last…

    First Lady Michelle Obama has taken up childhood obesity as the cause worthy of her attention. As ABC News reports, “The far-reaching, nationwide campaign called ‘Let’s Move’ calls for … myriad initiatives that target what Obama calls four key pillars: Getting parents more informed about nutrition and exercise, improving the quality of food in schools, making healthy foods more affordable and accessible for families, and focusing more on physical education.”

    We have to give Michelle credit for acknowledging that it’ll take far more than government to tackle such a problem. “There’s no expert on this planet who says that the government telling people what to do actually does any good with this issue. This is going to require an effort on everyone’s part.” However, her husband has a few connections and has created the first-ever federal task force for “optimal coordination” between private companies, nonprofits and government agencies. Optimal coordination doesn’t sound like a phrase that describes government, but who knows super-sized better than Barack Obama?

    In other news from the Village Academic Curriculum, the 2011 Obama budget makes further funding cuts for the District of Columbia’s Opportunity Scholarship Program, an education voucher system for low-income, mostly minority students. The 2010 budget had cut funding altogether, but in response to protests, some funding was restored. Now that amount will face an additional 30 percent cut. So, while these kids may not receive a good education, at least they’ll be skinny.

    Read more excellent articles at

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama), Blundering Bureaucrats, Conniving Politicians, Demo-gogues, Democracy, Democrats, economy, Fraud/Waste, Iran, Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Middle East, Patriotism, Political Prostitutes, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Public Opinion, Spine Donor Politicians Tagged: bipartisanship, Iran Nuclear Ambitions, Jobs Bill, Nuclear Iran, Political Comment, recession, Rep. Rep John Murtha (D-PA), Stimulus Two, TEA Party Protests, The Patriot Post, Tony

  • The Ayatollahs Are Asking For It

    By Alan Caruba

    The announcement by Iran’s President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on the occasion of the 31st anniversary of the Islamic Revolution that Iran was now “a nuclear state” was an invitation to have its nuclear facilities attacked by Israel.

    Israel, after all, is a nation that Ahmadinejad said should be “wiped off the map” and hardly a day has gone by for the past 31 years that some Iranian leader has not called for death to Israel and, yes, death to America.

    Let us, for a moment, cast a look back at the Israeli response to earlier nuclear threats. When the French built the Osirak nuclear reactor in Baghdad, the Israelis destroyed it on June 7, 1981 in a daring air raid. When the Syrians built a facility described as a “nuclear cache”, the Israelis destroyed it on September 6, 2007 in another air raid.

    For months now the Israeli air force has been practicing long-range bombing runs, putting their planes on a run to the straits of Gibraltar and back; about the same distance from Jerusalem to Tehran. The U.S. has been supplying “bunker-buster” bombs and there is no doubt in anyone’s mind that Israel has its own nuclear weapons.

    This Israeli response to the wars perpetrated against it since the day it declared its sovereignty in 1948 has been to turn out the entire nation to defeat their enemies.

    The U.S. will be among the last to know when the attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities will take place. The current administration is no friend to the Israelis, but they have dispatched their top intelligence and military people to Israel and to Saudi Arabia to sound out the when and wherefore of an attack. Meanwhile, the Israelis and their Saudi counterparts have been meeting to discuss the logistics of such an attack.

    No one knows better than the Saudis that a nuclear Iran poses a threat of incalculable proportions to their oil fields and facilities. No one knows better the vital importance of the Persian Gulf in the transport of oil.

    The Israelis will not wait for the first Iranian missile to be fired at them. In his book, “A World of Trouble”, Patrick Tyler wrote of the history of U.S. Middle East relations from the days of Eisenhower to George W. Bush.

    “The first reports of an Israeli air attack on Egypt reached the duty officer at the White House Situation Room at 2:38 a.m. on June 5, 1967. They came from news agencies whose correspondents could hear the bombs going off at air bases on the outskirts of Cairo.”

    In 1967, Egypt was ruled by Gamal Abdel Nasser, an advocate of Arab unity and the very definition of a loose cannon. “Lucius Battle, the insightful American ambassador who had just completed two years in Cairo, was deeply troubled by the ‘ungovernable problem’ of Nasser’s demagoguery.”

    The problem that has faced every president since the 1979 uprising in Iran has been the demagoguery of the Supreme Guides of the Iranian government since the Ayatollah Khomeini had led the overthrow of the Iranian Shah and the subsequent hostage taking of American diplomats whose release was not achieved until 444 days later when Ronald Reagan was inaugurated.

    The Six Day War, a preemptive attack on an Egypt that had massed troops in the Sinai, was an unmitigated disaster for Egypt and expanded the territory of Israel in the wake of its taking of Syria’s Golan Heights, the West Bank, Gaza and the Sinai (later returned).

    The Arab response was a conference in Khartoum in which the Arabs asserted its now-famous three no’s. No negotiation, no recognition, and no peace with Israel. Under the leadership of Anwar Sadat, peace with Egypt was achieved and his reward was to be assassinated. A similar peace was achieved with Jordan.

    Every U.S. president since then has demanded that Israel return territory in return for peace, but there has never been peace and there is not likely to be any. Islam is a warrior cult based on the Koran; essentially a battle plan to impose Islam on the world.

    The Iranian people are a wonderful people, but they are prisoners in their own nation and are currently struggling to rid themselves of the ayatollahs. Israel, however, does not have the privilege of waiting to see whether they are successful or not.

    The ayatollahs and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad are literally begging the Israeli’s to attack. They have mocked and deceived the West for decades in their quest for nuclear status and power.

    No amount of United Nations “sanctions” will have any more effect on the situation than they did against the former Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein.

    One of these mornings, the White House Situation Room will be informed of the Israeli attack on Iran’s nuclear facilities and you can be very sure that the entire West and the Middle East will breathe a sigh of relief when they do.

    The hypocrisy of condemnation that will follow will be vast, but tiny Israel will have saved the world and freed the Iranian people.

    Alan Caruba writes a daily post at Warning Signs. A business and science writer, he is the founder of The National Anxiety Center.

    Read more thought provoking articles at Warning Signs

    Filed under: America (USA), Fanatics, Fear-mongering, Iran, Israel, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Middle East, Politics, Propaganda Tagged: Alan Caruba, Iran Nuclear Ambitions, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, Nuclear Iran, Tony, Warning Signs

  • We’re The Best

    By Tom McLaughlin

    A few months ago, the Language Arts teacher in the next classroom asked the following question for a writing assignment: “Is the United States the best country in the world?” Only about 25 percent of our students thought so. We used to teach that to schoolchildren, but now they grow up hearing more about slavery and killing Indians than the ideals spelled out in our Declaration of Independence and our Constitution with its Bill of Rights. It’s those documents that make us the best. We will remain so as long as we abide by them.

    I asked the 75 percent who said the United States wasn’t the best, which country they thought was better. Although nobody could name one, they were certain it couldn’t possibly be us. For months I’ve been wondering why. There are several possible reasons, and most originated in the 1960s. My generation of baby boomers – the one most famous for rebelling against their parents generation as all generations do – never grew up. If it had, it would have realized that utopia is only a dream – that humans are imperfect and always will be this side of the grave.

    I watched a PBS fundraiser last week with Pete Seeger and his fellow leftists performing 1960s songs like “Blowing In the Wind” and “If I Had A Hammer.” They’re nice tunes and I still like them, but it occurred to me that my generation really believed it was possible to eliminate war forever.

    Bob Dylan wrote and sang nice lyrics like:

    “Yes, ‘n’ how many times must the cannon balls fly
    Before they’re forever banned?”

    and

    “Yes, ‘n’ how many deaths will it take till he knows
    That too many people have died?”

    Pete Seeger wrote and sang nice lyrics like:

    “It’s the hammer of justice
    It’s the bell of freedom
    It’s the song about love between my brothers and my sisters
    All over this land”

    Yahoo Answers asked about the meaning of “If I Had A Hammer” and picked the following as the best explanation:

    “It was recorded during the early ’60s as a song of enlightenment. It tells about the injustice of our society at that time, which really hasn’t changed much in 40-plus years. It speaks of the effort by the then baby boomer generation, to set the world straight about freedom and justice for all people regardless of race. We’re still waiting!”

    Indeed. The baby boomers are still waiting. Many still believe it’s possible to ban war and death and create justice and peace everywhere, and they’re running our universities. They control the mainstream media. A year ago, they took over the federal government. Now their savior, President Obama, goes around the world bowing to foreign leaders, apologizing for our country, and trying to redistribute our wealth.

    At 91, Pete Seeger is still a communist. President Obama’s good friend Bill Ayers claims he is a “small c” communist. He trains our public school teachers
    and writes textbooks about what they should teach. According to an article by Stanley Kurtz:

    “[Ayers] believes teacher education programs should serve as ‘sites of resistance’ to an oppressive system. The point, says Mr. Ayers in his ‘Teaching Toward Freedom,’ is to ‘teach against oppression,’ against America’s history of evil and racism, thereby forcing social transformation.”

    Ayers and the University of Illinois are typical of professors and universities who train our teachers all over the country. Their “sites of resistance” are our public-school classrooms. It’s almost exclusively “American oppression” their teachers “teach against” rather than the communist variety, or the more recent Radical Muslim variety because that’s what was drilled into them. Far more students are taught about Japanese internment camps in the U.S., for example, than about the Americans who died in the Bataan Death March at the hands of the Japanese in the Philippines.

    Although it goes against the multicultural shibboleths purporting that all cultures are equal, I would point to strong evidence that the United States is not only the best country in the world, it’s the best country in all of recorded history – a shining city on a hill, John Kennedy and Ronald Reagan called us.. The finest example would be our role in World War II. The war had been raging for years but we were reluctant to enter until attacked by the Japanese. Then we mobilized, fought on two fronts, and won against terrific odds. At war’s end, we possessed a huge military, were the only country with nuclear weapons, and the only country not damaged in battle. What did we do with that hegemony? Unique in all of history, the United States did not establish an American empire. Instead, we assisted other countries to rebuild – even our enemies – and did everything we could to preserve the autonomy in every country on earth large and small.

    In the face of all that, petulant, leftist baby boomers still wring their hands and call the United States “imperialist.” I shouldn’t be surprised by the way my students see their country, but I can’t help being saddened and dismayed. Whenever I have the opportunity, I shall emphasize more strongly what is unique and wonderful about the United States. We remain, Abraham Lincoln described us: “The last, best hope on earth.”

    Contributing Editor . Tom is a history teacher and a regular weekly columnist for newspapers in Maine and New Hampshire. He writes about political and social issues, history, family, education and Radical Islam.

    Read more excellent articles from

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Constitution, Democracy, Education, Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Patriotism, Politics, Propaganda, Public Opinion Tagged: Baby Boomers, Bill Ayers, FSM (Tom McLaughlin), Teachers, Tony, U.S. Constitution, U.S. Culture, World Peace

  • It Was Obama What Won Iraq

    By Andrew Bolt

    TonyfromOz prefaces …..

    WTF!

    I’m speechless. Here’s US vice president Joe Biden claiming that now-democratic Iraq is a triumph of the Obama Administration:

    I am very optimistic about — about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You’re going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer.

    You’re going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government… It’s impressed me. I’ve been impressed how they have been deciding to use the political process rather than guns to settle their differences.

    Utterly shameless. Here’s Biden on Iraq when George Bush actually secured that victory against the vicious opposition of Biden’s own party:

    I want to make it clear that I totally oppose the surging of additional American troops into Baghdad... I think it is contrary to the overwhelming body of informed opinion… A surge of up to 30,000 American troops cannot have any positive effect except for only temporary.

    Obama was just as opposed to Bush’s winning strategy in 2007:

    I am not persuaded that 20,000 additional troops in Iraq is going to solve the sectarian violence there. In fact, I think it will do the reverse.

    The victor is vilified, and the jackals steal his laurels for their own.

    TonyfromOz adds …..

    This is nothing but hypocritical rhetorical propagandist hyperbole. I’ll bet Joe can’t even look in a mirror without laughing.

    Andrew Bolt is a journalist and columnist writing for The Herald Sun in Melbourne Victoria Australia.

    Read more excellent articles from Andrew Bolt’s Blog

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama), Conniving Politicians, Democrats, Iraq, Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Middle East, Political Prostitutes, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Spine Donor Politicians, Vice President Joe Biden Tagged: Andrew Bolt, Iraq Surge, Iraq Troop Withdrawal, Joe Biden Gaffes, Tony, Vice President Joe Biden

  • Obama Shamelessly Used Lincoln

    By Alan Caruba

    As we close in on Abraham Lincoln’s birthday, February 12, it is safe to say that there will be no Obama memorials in Washington, D.C. for the same reason there are no statues of Jimmy Carter except in the Capitol building where statues of former presidents are a tradition.

    I read a book some years ago about the many statues of Lincoln that are to be found throughout the nation. They are a fitting tribute to a president credited with keeping the Union intact. The only thing Americans are presently united upon is reflected in Obama’s falling approval numbers in the polls taken to measure such things.

    Back in 2008, I took note of the shameless way the national memory and regard for Abraham Lincoln was used in marketing/advertising terms to “brand” young Obama as someone with the same greatness of character and wisdom as the sixteenth President, 1861-1865.

    Obama announced his candidacy on Lincoln’s birthday and he did so in front of the Old State capitol in Springfield, Illinois where Lincoln had delivered his famous “House Divided” speech in 1858.

    Immediately, the fawning mainstream media seized upon the image of Obama as a new Lincolnian figure on the American stage. As someone who has spent a long career in public relations I can tell you that this use of imagery and association with Lincoln by Obama’s handlers was masterful. They surely knew that the media would, like Pavlovian dogs, salivate at the opportunity to equate the young half-black Senator from Illinois with the iconic Civil War President.

    This imagery included having Obama “arrive” in Washington, D.C. on a train to mimic the way Lincoln had arrived to take office.

    Reams of adoring analysis of the Lincoln-Obama connection were written. Evan Thomas and Richard Wolffe of Newsweek magazine, on November 15, 2008, wrote a lengthy and largely nauseating commentary. During an appearance on MSNBC’s “Hardball” with Chris—a tingle ran up my leg—Matthews, Thomas actually said, “In a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God.”

    In his Newsweek piece, Evans wrote, “If there was any one message that defined the Obama campaign from the beginning, it was his promise to rise above the petty politics of division and unite the country. But now comes reality.” The reality, it turned out, was that Obama could not even unite his own party despite a majority control of both houses of Congress.

    From my perspective, there is nothing about Barack Obama that can be compared to Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln put some of his rivals in his cabinet. An argument could be made for his selection of Hillary Clinton to be his Secretary of State, but Obama after a series of embarrassing selections that included tax cheats filled his cabinet with slavish loyalists, and then added a layer of advisors, “Czars”, to circumvent congressional oversight.

    Lincoln possessed real humility and there is no evidence that Obama has any to call upon. If anything, there is hubris and a narcissism that is increasingly obvious to all and generates derision.

    It will not surprise me if some in the media drag out the tarnished Lincoln-Obama comparisons, but like so many other aspects of political reporting, it will just be vacuous blather.

    Alan Caruba writes a daily post at Warning Signs. A business and science writer, he is the founder of The National Anxiety Center.

    Read more thought provoking articles at Warning Signs

    Filed under: 111th Congress, America (USA), Barry Soetoro (aka Barack Hussein Obama), Conniving Politicians, Democracy, Democrats, Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Media Mind Manipulators, MSNBC (Mentally Stunted Nonsensical Bull Crap), Political Prostitutes, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Pseudo-Journalism, Spine Donor Politicians Tagged: Alan Caruba, Obama Double Standards, Obama Propaganda, President Abraham Lincoln, President Obama, Tony, Warning Signs

  • IPCC In The Hands Of Greens? Get Away With You

    By Andrew Bolt

    Even The Age now reports it:

    LEADING scientists have stepped up calls for a major overhaul of the United Nation’s climate panel following a string of criticisms of its Nobel peace prize-winning 2007 report…
    by 2035.

    Many subsequent criticism have focused on the panel’s use of ‘’grey literature’’ – work that has not been peer reviewed by other scientists including student thesis, reports by green groups and magazine articles – in parts of its 3000-page report.

    Writing in respected journal Nature, contributing author Eduardo Zorita … called for (the IPCC) to be made stronger and independent so that it drew only on established peer-reviewed literature and highlighted gaps in the published science. Opposing views would be included.

    Dr Zorita, from the GKSS Research Centre in Germany, said the IPCC’s use of government-nominated academic volunteers working under unmanageable deadlines had put it ‘’at the mercy of pressure from advocates‘’

    UPDATE

    Michael Mann, who developed his discredited ”hockey stick” to claim the world had never been warmer, has had to cancel his latest speech on global warming. Too much snow.

    Andrew Bolt is a journalist and columnist writing for The Herald Sun in Melbourne Victoria Australia.

    Read more excellent articles from Andrew Bolt’s Blog

    Filed under: America (USA), Blundering Bureaucrats, Climate Alarmists, Climate Change, Environment, Environmental activists, Europe, Fanatics, Fear-mongering, Fraud/Waste, Global Warming, Liberals, Lily-Livered Liberals, Limp-Wrist Liberals, Politics, Power Hungry, Propaganda, Public Opinion, U.N. – United Nations (United Nitwits) Tagged: Andrew Bolt, Climate Change Fraud, Climate Change Religion, Climategate, Global Warming Alarmism, Global Warming Hype, Michael Mann’s Hockey Stick, Professor Michael Mann, Tony, UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC)