Author: Robert Nelsen

  • Olympia: Don’t Crush Biotech With New Taxes

    Robert Nelsen wrote:

    Washington’s economy is showing signs of recovery. But some major problems persist—unemployment is stuck at a historic high and healthcare costs continue to skyrocket.

    The biotechnology industry can help alleviate both these problems. Washington is already a major hub of new biotech research and products. Boosting this sector will deliver our state—and our nation—from this economic slump. And if we don’t support it, others such as China and British Columbia are calling those of us in the investment community and asking “what can we do to get your investment dollars, and companies, to come here?”

    We are at a crossroads. Do our state legislators want the high paying jobs, and thriving economy that comes with strong biotech, or will they force the research, startups, and investors away with inadvertent innovation-killing policies.

    Life science companies directly employ more than 22,000 Washington residents, paying out over $5.3 billion in annual wages and contributing $5.7 billion in state GDP. This industry is a major producer of jobs in the state.

    The creation of bioscience jobs has a ripple effect on the rest of the economy. For every new job within the industry, 3.4 jobs are generated somewhere else. The life science sector indirectly supports some 55,000 jobs here in Washington and 2.4 million nationally. In other words, it’s not just well-trained scientists that benefit when the biotech sector grows. Union construction workers, engineers and a host of other goods and service providers also gain from biotech’s success.

    Washington is home to major international research institutions, including the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle Biomed, the Institute for Systems Biology, and the University of Washington.

    Bioscience also has a major role to play in reducing healthcare costs. Americans currently spend over $2 trillion a year on medical care. Lawmakers have been working tirelessly for the last year to devise a solution to this problem. But nothing will be as effective at lowering costs as sustained medical innovation.

    Pharmaceuticals have long been known to drastically reduce costs. New medications have brought down the cost of treating depression by mitigating the need for hospitalization. Likewise, cholesterol drugs have saved our health system billions of dollars by reducing the need for heart surgery. And how much of the healthcare dollar do you think goes to branded pharmaceuticals? Four percent. Yes…only four percent. Pills that cure disease are cheaper than doctors and hospitals.

    It’s no wonder that Lawrence Summers, President Obama’s chief economic advisor, recently noted that “over the long run, few issues are as important to a nation’s long-term economic security and global standing as being a leader in moving life sciences forward.”

    And given Washington’s strong bioscience industry, this state is poised to play an integral role in helping the life sciences industry fortify our economy.

    How does Washington’s life science sector compare to other states? It’s in the top ten for both research funding from the National Institutes of Health, and investment of bioscience venture capital.

    There are a number of ways lawmakers can accelerate the growth of this industry. The most urgent and immediate issue is before the state Legislature right now. The Washington State House and Senate are negotiating final revenue bills that include massive increases in taxes on the life sciences industry and its research institutions.

    If the State Legislature passes a bill like they did this week that almost doubles taxes on basic research in Washington (ESSB6143), this is a big problem for science and for jobs. If the State Legislature passes the proposed massive increases in taxes on investment income on foundations, research institutions, life science companies and venture capital investors, every venture fund will flee the state, and life sciences companies and research institutions will suffer. That would be the death of the industry. We need to make sure we have good policies in place that ensure researchers are incentivized to innovate and that cultivates a positive business climate for investment.

    Thankfully, there are some State legislators and leaders, including Governor Gregoire, Rob McKenna, and others who understand the value of biotechnology and can put a stop to the inadvertent killing of the industry at the state level.

    There are also issues at the federal level that must be addressed in order to ensure a vibrant life sciences sector. Hopefully, Congress will support sensible capital gains tax reform that will reduce taxes on investment in job-creating biotech investment, and not increase taxes as currently proposed.

    With the right support and some restraint of innovation-harming policies, Washington’s biotech community will continue to generate jobs and revive the economy, while also saving lives with new products and driving down healthcare costs.







  • Top Five Innovations to Watch in the Coming Decade

    Robert Nelsen wrote:

    The next decade will see the realization of many of the buzzwords of the last decade. The combination of the information era, the biotechnology revolution, and materials breakthroughs will drive new medical and cleantech inventions that will change our lives. The future of innovation in the United States is promising at its core and we will win unless policy makers accidentally harm innovation. They seem to be trying to do just that, in spite of their rhetoric, by doubling capital gains taxes on investors who fund job-creating cleantech and medical breakthroughs, proposing revised patent laws to penalize innovations, and accidentally constraining capital markets for high-tech with onerous regulations.

    Still, here are the five innovations to watch in the coming decade:

    1. The Return of Nanotechnology. Although much maligned as a “bubble,” this fundamental set of materials technologies that can unlock new physical properties and combinations of materials has been percolating away. Look for major innovations in solar energy that can produce electricity at 6 cents per kilowatt hour and which will compete with conventional power without subsidy. These are in the field now and will blow away the current big names in solar thermal, concentrated photovoltaics (CPV) and thin film solar. New battery innovations on flexible substrates and new form factors that are 2-5 times more efficient than current lithium ion batteries will emerge from the laboratory.

    2. Industrial Applications of Synthetic Biology. Many people think the word “synthetic biology” is a marketing word for “biology.” That is mostly true, but the technical strides in sequencing and synthesis of genes into complex systems is nothing short of mind-boggling. The folks who will succeed here are not the providers of the biology, but those who understand and own the biology AND can integrate it into industries like fuel, and agriculture. Companies like Sapphire Energy are already developing technologies that will revolutionize fuels and agriculture as we know it. The United States will produce our own green crude oil at home and at huge scale by 2020.

    3. P4 Medicine. A term coined by Leroy Hood to embody Personalized, Predictive, Preventive, and Participatory medicine. This technology will come of age. Driven by new cost reductions in the ability to sequence human genomes, we will finally be able to understand who will get disease, detect the disease early, and administer medicines that will work, only to those who need it. Medicine will be more cost effective and more targeted and “Smart pills” will be better and cheaper than expensive hospitals. The biggest barriers here are political—none of this will happen without …Next Page »