Author: Steven M. Gursten

  • Fifth Law Clerk Becomes Associate at Michigan Auto Law

    Michigan personal injury law firm has one of nation’s best law school mentoring programs

    I’m happy to announce that our current law clerk, Sarah S. Stempky, will be joining our law firm as an attorney. Stempky, of Royal Oak, is now our fifth Michigan Auto Law clerk to join the firm upon graduating law school.

    I began our law clerk mentoring program eight years ago, and it has become one of the firm’s proudest achievements.  My goal is to take truly talented, remarkable law students — the ones who are top of their classes and have exceptional legal skills —  and help them develop into the right kind of personal injury attorneys.

    I believe we have one of the best and most dynamic law student employment opportunities around. During the worst 15 years of Michigan law, when the civil justice system has faced its share of challenges, Michigan Auto Law has tripled in size, growing from six to 19 lawyers with the addition of Sarah. This period has seen some of the nation’s harshest tort reform laws enacted in Michigan.

    Opportunities for Law School Students at Michigan Auto Law

    The reason our mentoring program is so successful is because it’s dedicated to giving law students real opportunities to grow and gain valuable legal experience. If you’re a law student looking to become an outstanding civil justice lawyer, and someone who really cares about helping people, I encourage you to visit the “Opportunities” section on our web site. There are free resources for law students, including assistance with the no-fault questions on the Michigan bar exam. We also list the top 10 tips for new personal injury attorneys and give considerations for entering this field of law.

    The firm’s attorneys who started as law clerks are shown in the photo above. From left is Roger J. Thon, Sarah S. Stempky, Brandon M. Hewitt, Alison F. Tomak and Thomas W. James. These excellent lawyers all started as highly accomplished law students who demonstrated a commitment to helping people, a belief in our civil justice system, and exceptional legal skills.

    About Our Newest Personal Injury Attorney, Sarah Stempky

    Sarah will serve as a litigation attorney. She has a bachelor’s degree from Alma College in psychology. Stempky will receive her juris doctorate from the Michigan State University College of Law, where she will graduate with Cum Laude honors.

    At Michigan State University, she was an instrumental member of her Commercial Arbitration Team and Moot Court Team for two years, respectively. Her Commercial Arbitration Team won the regional championship of the American Bar Association 2009-10 Arbitration Competition in Omaha, Nebraska. Additionally, Stempky’s Moot Court and Advocacy Board Team were semi-finalists of the William W. Daniel Mock Trial Competition in Atlanta, Georgia.

    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious car and truck accident injury cases and automobile insurance no-fault litigation.

    Related links:

    Personal Injury Law Clerk Opportunities

    Guide for Michigan Lawyers: Pursuing Auto Injury Claims

    Attorney Video: Do I Have a Car Accident Case?

    About Michigan Auto Law:
    Michigan Auto Law is a third-generation law firm with 19 lawyers specializing in helping people who have been seriously injured in car accidents, truck accidents and motorcycle accidents throughout the state. The firm has received the top reported jury verdict for auto accident cases in Michigan in the past six years, according to published year-end verdicts and settlements reports. Michigan Auto Law is headquartered in Southfield, at 26555 Evergreen Road, Suite 1530; with additional offices in Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights. For more information, call (800)777-0028.

  • Why is the Pre-Trip Inspection the Most Violated Safety Rule in Truck Accident Cases?

    Rule of the Road No. 7 – How to poke holes in a dishonest truck driver’s story during the deposition

    Pre-trip inspection requirements are probably the most violated mandatory safety rule by the trucking industry today. Unfortunately, most lawyers who handle truck accident cases have no idea what those inspection requirements are. Most lawyers think a pre-trip inspection is one inspection by the driver before he gets behind the wheel.

    Wrong.

    As required by 49 CFR § 392.9, a truck driver must inspect his truck and cargo:

    •    Within the first 50 miles of a trip,
    •    Whenever the driver changes duty status, and
    •    When he drives more than three hours or 150 miles.

    And that, if you ask any experienced truck accident lawyer, is almost never done. When it is done, it’s usually wrong. If you see a 10-minute inspection on the driver’s log books (lie logs, as many truckers derisively refer to them), you know that trucker is cutting corners. Unfortunately, when it comes to pre-trip inspections of 80,000 pound tractor-trailers on our roadways, cutting corners means that a lot of very preventable truck accidents occur.

    Why does a 10-minute pre-trip inspection mean that important things are being skipped over?

    Under 49 CFR § 396.11, every motor carrier must require its drivers to report, and every truck driver must prepare a written pre-trip inspection report at the completion of each day’s work on each vehicle operated. The report MUST cover the following at a minimum:

    •    Service brakes (including trailer brake connections),
    •    Parking brakes,
    •    Steering mechanism,
    •    Lighting devices and reflectors,
    •    Tires,
    •    Horn,
    •    Windshield wipers,
    •    Rear-view mirrors,
    •    Coupling devices,
    •    Wheels and rims, and
    •    Emergency equipment

    Before driving the truck, the trucker must be satisfied that the vehicle is in safe operating condition. Then he must review the last driver’s inspection report and sign it, certifying that any required repairs have been performed.

    Take a look at this sample driver log.

    How Much Time Did the Trucker Really Spend on the Inspection?

    Looking at our sample driver log above, it appears that this driver only allowed himself 15 minutes to perform a pre-trip inspection of his truck. Drivers often document very little time for inspections (frankly, because money is wasted when they’re not driving). Many truck accident lawyers have found that truckers typically either spend much less than is actually needed to perform a proper inspection, or falsify the inspection time on the daily long. This situation sets up a fantastic opportunity to impeach the credibility of the driver.

    During the deposition, a truck accident lawyer can ask:

    •    Was a pre-trip inspection completed?
    •    What did you inspect?
    •    In what manner did you inspect the various parts and accessories?
    •    How long did that take you?
    •    Was this inspection recorded on FMCSA compliant paperwork?
    •    How often do you perform this inspection?
    •    Have you ever found faulty parts or accessories during this inspection?
    •    When was the last time you reported a vehicle as out-of-service and brought it in for repairs?
    •    How do you record this downtime on your log book?
    •    Is 15 minutes enough to thoroughly inspect these parts and accessories?
    •    Who within the organization trained you on proper pre-trip inspection procedures?
    •    Do you believe that 15 minutes is sufficient?

    By asking these questions, a truck accident lawyer will either expose the driver with a) submitting a false log for only reporting 15 minutes on the inspection or, b) conducting an improper pre-trip inspection for not thoroughly inspecting the list of parts and accessories under 49 CFR § 396.11.

    Again, if you know what to look for, and what to ask, you can nab a trucker who was negligent with his inspection report in the deposition. My series on “Rules of the Road” for truck accident lawyers will continue Tuesday, with a blog on  driving under hazardous conditions.

    –    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious truck accident injury cases. He serves on the board of governors for the Association of Plaintiffs Interstate Trucking Lawyers of America.  Steve is past-president of the American Association for Justice Truck Litigation Group. Recently, he was named a Michigan Lawyers Weekly Leader in the Law for his efforts to promote truck safety and his help in stopping preventable truck accidents in Michigan.

    – Photo courtesy of Creative Commons, by Elsie esq.

    Related information:

    Things to Know After a Truck Accident

    Michigan Truck Accident Facts and Causes

    Michigan Truck Accident Statistics

    Previous blogs from “Rules of the Road Every Truck Accident Lawyer Needs to Know” series:

    Rules of the Road: Intro for Truck Lawyers

    Truck Driver Fatigue

    Truck Lawyers: Get Your Hands on Those Discovery Documents!

    Investigate the Trucker’s Background and History

    Truck Driver Qualification Files

    What Truck Accident Lawyers Must Know About Black Boxes

    How to Nab the Tired Trucker

    Michigan Auto Law exclusively handles car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state of Michigan. We have offices in Southfield, Sterling Heights, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Detroit to better serve you. Call (800) 777-0028 for a free consultation from one of our expert attorneys.

  • How to Nab the Tired Trucker in a Deposition

    Rule of the Road No. 6 – Truck Accident Attorneys Show How to Identify Driver Fatigue

    A recent survey states that 20 percent of truck drivers nationwide admitted to falling asleep at the wheel in a given month. This stat comes at no surprise to our truck accident attorneys, who frequently handle horrible truck crash cases, caused when fatigued truckers continue driving over the legal limits. This is usually due to intense pressure by management, as well as financial incentives to drive past federally regulated hours of service.

    It’s against the law. And it’s incredibly dangerous to fall asleep when driving an 80,000 pound tractor-trailer on the public roadways.

    Under 49 CFR § 392.3, no driver shall operate a commercial motor vehicle, and a motor carrier shall not require or permit a driver to operate a commercial motor vehicle, while the driver’s ability or alertness is so impaired as to make it unsafe for him to operate the truck.

    Obviously, a truck driver will never tell you he was too “fatigued” to have been behind the wheel during his deposition. But a series of questions regarding the driver’s medical condition or recent food and beverage purchases can determine whether or not he was operating a commercial truck while ill or fatigued.

    Sample Deposition Questions for the Tired Truck Driver

    •    Within the 48 hours preceding the accident, where did you stop to eat?
    •    What did you have to eat?
    •    What did you have to drink?
    •    Did you experience an upset stomach later? Did feel any nausea? Diarrhea?
    •    If so, did you pull off the road?
    •    How long did you wait before returning to driving?
    •    Did you have any coffee or tea? Any energy drinks? Any other caffeinated beverages?
    •    How many of these caffeinated beverages did you consume within the last 12 hours leading up to the accident?
    •    Were you taking any medications at the time of the accident?
    •    What conditions were those medications treating?
    •    Where those conditions disclosed during your physical? Would they appear on your medical certificate?

    Many of these questions could be answered upon inspection of the truck or the driver’s supporting documents if your spoliation requests and temporary restraining orders are filed soon after the date of the accident. You’ll often find empty prescription bottles, empty energy drink cans or coffee cups, bottles of Pepto-Bismol, TUMS or any other over-the-counter digestive system medication.

    What Medications was the Driver Who Caused the Truck Accident Taking?

    It’s important for truck accident attorneys to take the time to do a little research on some of the medications the driver was taking — whether prescribed or over the counter. What are the side effects of these drugs? Chances are, at least some of these medications warn consumers from operating heavy equipment while taking doses.

    Here’s a dramatic — and very true — example. In one of my cases, Nunez v. Utica Transit Mix, my client was senselessly killed by a truck driver who was on powerful epilepsy medication that causes drowsiness. The driver also admitted he had no training and was driving his fully-loaded gravel hauler when it was out-of-service five different ways.

    This egregious case was part of a truck safety campaign I headed up last year, which found that more than 1,000 truck companies in Michigan — and more than 28,000 motor carrier companies nationally — are on our roads with unsatisfactory safety ratings. One of the most common regulations that’s disregarded in Michigan is truckers driving past federal regulations; and a fatigued truck driver is just as impaired in judgment and reaction time as a drunk driver.

    If you know what to look for, you can nab these tired and very dangerous truckers in the deposition. My series on “Rules of the Road” for truck accident attorneys will continue Tuesday, with a blog on truck inspection requirements.

    –    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious truck accident injury cases. He serves on the board of governors for the Association of Plaintiffs Interstate Trucking Lawyers of America.  Steve is past-president of the American Association for Justice Truck Litigation Group. Recently, he was named a Michigan Lawyers Weekly Leader in the Law for his efforts to promote truck safety and his help in stopping preventable truck accidents in Michigan.

    – Photo courtesy of Creative Commons, by tm-tm

    Related information:

    8 Things to Know About a Truck Accident

    Truck Industry Myths

    Michigan Truck Accident Attorney  Video Library

    Previous blogs from “Rules of the Road Every Truck Accident Lawyer Needs to Know” series:

    Rules of the Road: Intro for Truck Lawyers

    Truck Driver Fatigue

    Truck Lawyers: Get Your Hands on Those Discovery Documents!

    Investigate the Trucker’s Background and History

    Truck Driver Qualification Files

    What Truck Accident Lawyers Must Know About Black Boxes

    Michigan Auto Law exclusively handles car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state of Michigan. We have offices in Southfield, Sterling Heights, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Detroit to better serve you. Call (800) 777-0028 for a free consultation from one of our expert attorneys.

  • What Truck Accident Lawyers Must Know About Black Boxes

    Rule of the Road No. 5 – How Black Box Data Can Prove Liability in Truck Crash Cases

    Steve Gursten spoke last month at the American Association for Justice "Litigating Truck Collision Cases Seminar" in New Orleans.

    Steve Gursten recently spoke at the AAJ Truck Litigation Seminar

    “Black boxes” have completely revolutionized the way trucking companies can monitor the activities of their truck drivers. They’ve also revolutionized the way truck accident lawyers litigate serious crash cases, as black boxes may likely help prove your case and discredit the defense.

    The term “black box” is thrown around a lot these days. It can refer to electronic log systems, electronic data recorders and electronic control modules systems. Black boxes are usually equipped with global positioning systems (GPS) and can be an important source of information about the truck and its journey. They accurately record a driver’s daily duty status and hours on the job.

    How a Truck Accident Attorney Can Apply Black Box Information to Win a Case

    So many preventable truck accidents are caused by drivers working beyond the regulated hours of service.  And if you ask any experienced truck accident lawyer, he will tell you that many drivers and companies routinely falsify driver logs. Because of this widespread cheating, the fake driver logs are often called “lie logs” throughout the industry.

    If you end up filing suit against a truck company that employs black boxes, you must include black box and other electronic data records in your discovery requests, even if the company supplies you with copies of the truck driver’s handwritten driver logs.

    Send a preservation of evidence letter (also known as a spoliation letter) via certified mail to the motor carrier, notifying it that black box data is required to be preserved for litigation.  Also request that the truck not be moved or repaired as the event recorder can be erased or recorded over before it is downloaded.  If necessary, file a TRO. Whatever you do, preserve that evidence before the other side can destroy it.

    This is a great way to fact check a truck driver’s log books. If you find that the trucking company refuses to produce this data because it has either been “lost” or “destroyed,” you can demand the back-up copy that the FMCSA now requires be kept somewhere other than on the  truck’s on-board computer.   Remember, this must be updated each month.

    The information is out there to win your case. For additional, detailed information on how to obtain black box data and use it to prove your case, read my web page on black boxes.

    The Black Box in Truck Litigation

    In effort to be become compliant with hours of service regulations, some trucking companies, especially some of the larger motor carriers, have now implemented the use of these electronic on-board data computers.

    Under 49 CFR § 395.15, a FMCSA compliant black box used in lieu of the handwritten driver logs must:

    * Warn the driver visually and/or audibly that the device has ceased to function.

    * If the device is not functioning (or simply turned off), the trucker must hand write his daily logs for the current day and any of the past seven days that the driver is missing records until the device is once again activated.

    * The truck company must also maintain a second, back-up copy of the electronic hours of service files, by month, in a different physical location than where the original data is stored.

    But Black Box Data Can be Destroyed…

    I previously stressed that the information you need to prove a truck driver was negligent and therefore caused a serious truck accident is out there. But please remember that this invaluable information is only out there for a short period of time. That’s why a truck accident lawyer must start the truck accident investigation fast.

    I normally don’t encourage people who’ve been injured in a car crash to go out and hire lawyers, but trucks are different.  There is so much critical information that can be destroyed – quite legally and intentionally. This information is so critical to winning a truck accident case, that I believe these cases require a lawyer to be hired immediately.

    For example, by law, trucking companies can destroy black box data (and other vital records such as log books, receipts and pre-trip inspection documents) after 60 days. It’s not unusual for Michigan trucking companies to destroy or ‘lose’ important documents that proved their negligence and/or hours of service violations to avoid financial responsibility to the people they have seriously injured or killed in deadly truck crashes.

    My series on “Rules of the Road” for truck accident lawyers will continue Tuesday, with a blog on fatigued truckers.

    –    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious truck accident injury cases. He serves on the board of governors for the Association of Plaintiffs Interstate Trucking Lawyers of America.  Steve is past-president of the American Association for Justice Truck Litigation Group. Recently, he was named a Michigan Lawyers Weekly Leader in the Law for his efforts to promote truck safety and his help in stopping preventable truck accidents in Michigan.

    Related information:

    Michigan Truck Accident Facts and Causes

    Finding All Insurance After a Truck Crash

    Truck Accident FAQs

    Previous blogs from “Rules of the Road Every Truck Accident Lawyer Needs to Know” series:

    Rules of the Road: Intro for Truck Lawyers

    Truck Driver Fatigue

    Truck Lawyers: Get Your Hands on Those Discovery Documents!

    Investigate the Trucker’s Background and History

    Truck Driver Qualification Files

    Michigan Auto Law exclusively handles car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state of Michigan. We have offices in Southfield, Sterling Heights, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Detroit to better serve you. Call (800) 777-0028 for a free consultation from one of our expert attorneys.

  • Truck Accident Attorneys Can Highlight Motor Carrier’s Failure to Keep Driver File

    Rule of the Road No. 4 – Know that Complete Driver Qualification File is a MUST After a Truck Accident

    A motor carrier is required to keep seven documents in each of its drivers’ qualification files. But it’s almost inevitable that a negligent truck company will fail to produce a complete file after a serious truck accident in Michigan.

    In this event, a truck accident attorney’s trial preparation must highlight the carrier’s failure to comply with 49 CFR § 391.51.  This critical Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Regulation states that a motor carrier is required to maintain a complete driver qualification file for each driver it employs.

    The truck driver qualification file must include:

    1. The trucker’s application for employment;

    2. A copy of the motor vehicle record received from each state where the driver held or holds a motor vehicle operator’s license during the preceding three years;

    3. The certificate of driver’s road test issued to the driver or a copy of the license or certificate which the motor carrier accepted as equivalent to the driver’s road test;

    4. The motor vehicle record received from each state drivers licensing agency to the annual driver record inquiry;

    5. A note relating the annual review of the driver’s driving record;

    6. A list or certificate relating to violations of motor vehicle laws and ordinances; and

    7. The medical examiner’s certificate.

    Once again, the qualification file must be retained by the truck company for as long as the driver is employed by that motor carrier and for three years thereafter.

    Keep in mind, this regulation does not suggest a carrier SHOULD  maintain SOME of these documents, but that ALL of these documents MUST be included in the driver qualification file.

    More often than not, these documents are either outdated (especially the medical examiner’s certificate), or completely missing from the file. In your discovery requests, be sure to include all of the itemized documents that a carrier is required to preserve within 49 CFR § 391.51. Read here for more tips on legal discovery of the trucker and the truck. Here’s an extensive list of discovery documents.

    On Thursday, my series on “Rules of the Road” for truck accident attorneys will continue with laws regarding automatic, on-board hours of service devices.

    –    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious truck accident injury cases. He is on the board of governors for the Association of Plaintiffs Interstate Trucking Lawyers of America and past president of the American Association for Justice Truck Litigation Group. Recently, he was named a Michigan Lawyers Weekly Leader in the Law for his efforts to promote truck safety.

    – Photo courtesy of Creative Commons, by redjar

    Related information:

    Michigan Truck Accident Statistics

    Michigan Truck Regulations

    Support for Truck Drivers

    Previous blogs from “Rules of the Road Every Truck Accident Lawyer Needs to Know” series:

    Rules of the Road: Intro for Truck Lawyers

    Truck Driver Fatigue

    Truck Lawyers: Get Your Hands on Those Discovery Documents!

    Investigate the Trucker’s Background and History

    Michigan Auto Law exclusively handles car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state of Michigan. We have offices in Southfield, Sterling Heights, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Detroit to better serve you. Call (800) 777-0028 for a free consultation from one of our expert attorneys.

  • Truck Lawyers Must Investigate Trucker’s Background and Accident History

    Tip from my recent trucking lawyer seminar: Teaching truck accident attorneys what info a trucking company should have gathered on drivers before hiring – but didn’t or just ignored

    The unfit truck driver who never should have been placed behind the wheel of an 80,000 pound tractor-trailer is often the key to your truck accident case. Remember that under 49 CFR § 391.23, an interstate commercial motor carrier has the responsibility to conduct investigations into the background of each commercial truck driver it employs.

    An employing truck company must make an inquiry into each state where an applicant driver previously held or currently holds a motor vehicle operator’s license or permit for the last three years – and obtain that driver’s motor vehicle record. The carrier must also investigate the driver’s safety performance history with other interstate motor carriers he had worked for within the preceding three years.

    Rule of the Road No. 3 – Pursue Negligent Trucking Companies for Failing to Properly Investigate the Unfit Driver

    More often than not, trucking companies fail to adequately investigate an applicant’s background and character, if they do so at all.

    Here’s what truck accident lawyers should do: When you depose the safety director of a trucking company, or whoever is doing the hiring, you need to ask whether the truck driver’s previous employment with other motor carriers was fully investigated.

    Have them show you the driver personnel file and what they do to investigate drivers.  See if they do medical checks and checks into that driver’s accident history and driving record.  If the trucking company has not followed the law, the trucking company is liable for negligently entrusting, supervising and training the unfit trucker who has caused the crash.

    Visit my website for more info on discovery of the truck driver.

    Check with the Trucker’s Previous Employers, Too

    Taking a closer look at the rule, a compliant § 391.23 investigative review may consist of personal interviews, telephone interviews, letters or any other method for investigating that the carrier deems appropriate.

    Each motor carrier is required to make a written record with respect to each previous employer contacted, or (at the minimum) some good faith effort to do so. The record must include the previous employer’s name and address, the date the previous employer was contacted (or the attempts made), and the information received about the driver.

    Most importantly, under 49 CFR § 391.53, the safety performance histories received from the previous employers must be retained for as long as the driver is employed by that motor carrier and for three years thereafter.

    Most carriers violate this rule. Some fail to even take the initial steps in performing an investigation, but of those that do, most rarely keep records of this investigation throughout the duration of the driver’s employment.

    Before stepping into a deposition with a carrier’s safety director, evidence of a pre-employment investigation must be requested in discovery. If the carrier has failed to produce any documentation of a pre-employment investigation, chances are the carrier is non compliant with § 391.23 and § 391.53, and also may be liable.

    My next blog on rule of the road no. 4 will cover the motor carrier’s duty to keep a complete truck driver qualification file.

    –    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious truck accident injury cases. He is on the board of governors for the Association of Plaintiffs Interstate Trucking Lawyers of America and past president of the American Association for Justice Truck Litigation Group. Recently, he was named a Michigan Lawyers Weekly Leader in the Law for his efforts to promote truck safety.

    – Photo courtesy of Creative Commons, by Rugged

    Related information:

    Finding the Dirt on Unsafe Truck Companies

    For Truck Accident Lawyers: The Michigan Truck Accident Investigation

    Michigan Truck Rules and Regulations

    Previous blogs from “Rules of the Road Every Truck Accident Lawyer Needs to Know” Series:

    Rules of the Road: Intro for Truck Lawyers

    Truck Driver Fatigue

    Truck Lawyers: Get Your Hands on Those Discovery Documents!

    Michigan Auto Law exclusively handles car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state of Michigan. We have offices in Southfield, Sterling Heights, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Detroit to better serve you. Call (800) 777-0028 for a free consultation from one of our expert attorneys.

  • March is Traumatic Brain Injury Awareness Month

    TBI Lawyer gives brain injury prevention tips, so Michigan drivers can protect themselves from the “silent epidemic”

    There are 1.4 million people across the country who sustain a traumatic brain injury every year.

    About 50,000 people die from brain injury.

    Another 235,000 are hospitalized annually.

    And 1.1 million people are treated and released from hospital emergency rooms.

    These statistics from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention are startling, and show how pervasive this “silent epidemic” can be.  But what the CDC  cannot count is the number of people with TBI who are not seen in an emergency room, or who receive no care.

    One of the main reasons for this is because emergency rooms miss up to 85 percent of brain injuries after a person has been in a car accident.  Our brain injury lawyers have witnessed accident cases where a catastrophically brain-injured person literally walked away after a car crash, without even an ambulance or ER visit, only to become permanently disabled with a serious traumatic brain injury.

    And as lawyers specializing in brain injury cases, we certainly believe it’s important to stress the fact that ERs frequently miss the diagnosis of brain injuries. March is Traumatic Brain Injury Awareness Month. Since motor vehicle accidents (primarily car accidents and truck accidents) are the leading cause of TBI, we’d like to offer some important prevention tips.

    Protect Yourself from Brain Injury

    1. Motorcycle helmets provide protection for motorcycle drivers for all types of closed-head injuries, and, contrary to urban myth, are not associated with increased neck injuries.

    2. As many as 85 percent of bicycle-related head injuries could be prevented if bike riders were to wear protective helmets. An average of 140,000 head injuries per year are attributed to children and adolescents in bicycle accidents. (Our lawyers play an active role in the Michigan Association for Justice bike helmet give-away held several times a year, and have donated thousands of dollars to help prevent child brain injuries.)

    3. Air bags have been associated with a substantial reduction of fatalities in car accidents involving adults. However, children younger than 10 (seated in the front seat) had a 34 percent increased risk of dying in frontal crashes in cars equipped with dual airbags.

    4. A study reports side air bags, which include head protection, can decrease deaths from side-impact crashes up to 45 percent. The majority of deaths in a side collision are a result of head injuries.

    (Sources: 1. Journal of Trauma, 38(2): 242-245; 2. New England Journal of Medicine, 320: 1361-1367; 3. Journal of the American Medical Association, 298(17): 1437-1439; Insurance Institute of Highway Safety)

    You can also check out the Brain Injury Association of America web site.

    Common Symptoms of TBI

    Another way to protect yourself against traumatic brain injury is to be aware of the symptoms. Sadly, many doctors miss them while focusing only on the acute injuries, and it’s not uncommon for months to pass before a brain injury is formally diagnosed.

    Early TBI is often not detected by traditional MRI or CT scans because the brain actually goes into a hyper-metabolic state as it tries to protect itself after a trauma. There is an uptake of glucose that masks many of the symptoms. But symptoms often worsen over time, causing further injury and brain damage.

    Remember the tragedy of Natasha Richardson last year. She fell on a bunny hill while skiing, and then resumed skiing only to succumb to a fatal brain injury. This demonstrated a person can suffer a traumatic brain injury serious enough to kill, and yet function very well for hours and sometimes days afterward.

    Here is a list of common TBI symptoms.

    Physical:
    * Chronic headaches or neck pain;
    * Feeling exhausted all the time;
    * Mood changes;
    * Changes in sleep patterns;
    * Light-headedness, dizziness or loss of balance;
    * Nausea;
    * Increased sensitivity to lights and sounds;
    * Blurred vision or tired eyes;
    * Loss of sense of smell or taste; and
    * Ringing in the ears, called tinnitus.

    Cognitive:
    * Difficulty remembering, concentrating or making decisions;
    * Slowness in thinking, speaking, acting or reading;
    * Getting lost or easily confused;
    * Difficulty focusing;
    * Depression; and
    * Anxiety.

    Please visit the TBI section in my web site for a more detailed account of traumatic brain injury symptoms.

    If you have been in an auto accident and suspect you have TBI, you can call Michigan Auto Law and speak with an attorney about your options any time, at (800) 777-0028. We understand the emotional and physical trauma brain injury victims experience, and we are here to help you get through it.

    On Thursday, I will resume my series of blogs on the top Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration regulations trucking lawyers must know.

    –    Steven M. Gursten is a member of the American Association for Justice Traumatic Brian Injury Group and the Sarah Jane Brain Project. Steve received a trial verdict of $5.65 million for a TBI victim; the largest reported auto negligence verdict in Michigan for the year.

    –   Photo courtesy of Creative Commons, by mikebaird

    Related information:

    Steps TBI Victims Must Take Following a Car Accident

    Michigan Traumatic Brain Injury Law

    Video: Do I Have a Car Accident Case?

    Michigan Auto Law exclusively handles car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state of Michigan. We have offices in Southfield, Sterling Heights, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Detroit to better serve you.

  • Truck Lawyers: Get Your Hands on Those Discovery Documents!

    Helping truck accident lawyers better understand preservation of supporting documents to strengthen your case

    A truck accident lawyer who conducts thorough legal discovery will most often, lay the groundwork for a successful truck case in Michigan. Many commercial truck crash cases begin with investigation of the driver. You must look deeper than the circumstances surrounding the crash itself.

    For pre-deposition or interrogatory analysis, there are several other ways to “fact check” the accuracy of a driver’s daily log book. Receipts for food and gas accumulated throughout the day, bills of lading, toll receipts, “EZ Pass”-type toll collection system records, and on-board GPS tracking print-outs are just a few examples of the verifiable footprints a driver leaves behind when he’s on the road. A savvy truck accident lawyer will be able to determine whether it was feasible for the driver to actually make the trip he documented in his daily log.

    Rule of the Road No. 2 – You Have Less than Six Months to Get Those Docs

    Federal truck law 49 CFR § 395.8(k)(1) requires motor carriers to retain all supporting discovery documents at their principal places of business for a period of six months from the date of receipt. Under the regs, “supporting documents” are defined as motor carrier records, maintained in the ordinary course of business, used by the motor carrier to verify the information recorded on the driver’s daily log.” Essentially, any documents directly related to the trucking company’s operation, which are retained by the truck in connection with the operation of its transportation business, are considered “supporting documents.”

    Failure to preserve these supporting documents for six months after driver submission is considered a “critical” offense under Appendix B to § 385. If in your discovery, you find that the carrier is destroying or not preserving its drivers’ daily logs and supporting documents, you will know that this particular carrier is altering its overall safety rating and (most importantly) violating federal law.

    If the carrier did have such supporting documents in its possession, and it’s later found that the driver violated federal driving limits, your case against the carrier itself will be significantly strengthened.

    Under 49 CFR § 395.8(k)(1), these supporting documents were in the carrier’s possession. The carrier either failed to stop the driver from driving over the limits, or it continued to dispatch the driver for additional work with notice that the driver was over. Ultimately, the carrier has the burden to investigate and audit its driver’s hours of service through supporting documents. Simply ignoring false logs presented by its drivers will not absolve a carrier from liability.

    Big Trucks, Big Business

    Keep in mind, an inexperienced attorney who is not familiar with these important time lines could let some of the most critical evidence slip through the cracks. If he waits too long, the evidence can be legally destroyed; dramatically altering the outcome of the truck case and the plaintiff’s recovery.

    I’d like to wrap this up by reminding truck accident victims and lawyers alike that many large trucking companies instantly employ an array of defense tactics following a crash, to mitigate and lessen liability. Michigan lawyers need to start the investigation into a serious personal injury or fatality case immediately.

    Next week, I will share with you my third Rule of the Road, regarding investigation into a truck driver’s background and character.

    –    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious truck accident injury cases. He is on the board of governors for the Association of Plaintiffs Interstate Trucking Lawyers of America and past president of the American Association for Justice Truck Litigation Group. Recently, he was named a Michigan Lawyers Weekly Leader in the Law for his efforts to promote truck safety.

    – Photo courtesy of Creative Commons, by Muffet

    Related information:

    Michigan Truck Accident Investigation

    Legal Discovery: The Truck

    Find the Right Lawyer for Your Truck Accident Case

    Video for Lawyers: Phases of a Truck Accident Lawsuit

    Michigan Auto Law exclusively handles car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state of Michigan. We have offices in Southfield, Sterling Heights, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Detroit to better serve you. Call (800) 777-0028 for a free consultation from one of our expert attorneys.

  • Truck Driver Fatigue

    Helping truck accident attorneys better understand hours of service regulations

    Driver fatigue is the hot topic right now for truck accident attorneys and the trucking industry, and for a very good reason. Truckers are often pushed to drive beyond physical – and legal – limits.  Most often, they’re forced to do this by trucking companies aiming to cut corners and save money. For the truckers, breaking these hours of service regs can mean the difference between putting food on the table, or being next in the unemployment line.

    But a tired truck driver is as impaired as an intoxicated driver. And truck driver fatigue is one of the most common causes of preventable truck accidents, both in Michigan and across the country.

    It’s important to stop these trucking companies, and I’m going to tell you how.

    Rule of the Road No. 1 – Hours of Service Regulations

    Hours of service regulations are found at 49 CFR §§ 395.3 and 395.8, and are some the most important federal regulations for lawyers to remember in any truck crash case. Knowledge of hours of service regulations, coupled with a careful study of a truck driver’s record of duty status (or daily log book) and supporting documents, can reveal driver fatigue.

    Driver fatigue is typically caused by inadequate sleep, working too many hours or driving while sick.  Studies have found truck driver fatigue to be a more potent driving impairment than the influence of drugs or alcohol — yet a wide number of truck drivers bend the rules to maximize their time behind the wheel. In an effort to combat dangerous sleep deprivation, the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA) strictly regulates the amount of time truck drivers spend their workday driving and being classified as “on-duty.” Under 49 CFR  § 395.3, drivers are limited to 60 hours of compensated work in a seven-day period or 70 hours in an eight-day period.

    Under the current rules, truck drivers can be driving on the road for 11 hours each shift, up to 70 hours per week.

    Truck Lawyer Tip: Driving Doesn’t Necessarily Mean Working

    Drivers are limited to a total of 14 hours of work in a single “on-duty” period. This type of non-driving activity could include all time:

    * Waiting to be dispatched at a terminal,

    * Doing a pre-trip inspection,

    * Loading and unloading,

    * Repairing the truck,

    * Waiting for the truck to be repaired, or,

    * Even  during a DOT roadside inspection.

    Virtually any work performed in the capacity of a motor carrier should be added to a driver’s 14-hour daily work limit. However, even work performed for another company or organization will count toward a driver’s on-duty period – even if it’s completely unrelated to the trucking industry. Under 49 CFR § 395.2(9), “on- duty” time means performing “any compensated work for a person who is not a motor carrier.”  See the official interpretation of this regulation accompanying the rule:

    Question: Must non-transportation-related work for a motor carrier be recorded as on-duty time?

    Guidance: Yes. All work for a motor carrier, whether compensated or not, must be recorded as on-duty time. The term “work” as used in the definition of “on-duty time” in § 395.2 of the FMCSRs is NOT LIMITED to driving or OTHER NON TRANSPORTATION-RELATED EMPLOYMENT.

    Tired Truck Driver Example: Drivers CHEAT on their logs

    Here’s an example to illustrate the point:

    John Doe is an assembly technician for a manufacturing plant. He typically puts in 40 to 45 hours a week at the plant and makes a modest living to support his family. Recently, the variable interest rate mortgage on his home increased, forcing John to find another job. He began driving for XYZ trucking company in the fall. Last week, John put in 45 hours at his manufacturing job, and on Friday night, took a weekend load spanning 1,000 miles. John drove 11 hours on Saturday and nine hours on Sunday.

    On the surface, it seems John was fully compliant with the hours of service rules, but under the interpretation of §395.2(9), John was on-duty for 65 hours in a seven-day work week – five hours longer than is allowed under the current federal regulations. Be aware of § 395.2(9) when deposing your drivers, as they may work several different jobs within a given work week, exposing themselves and the truck company to further liability.

    Here’s a well-known secret: Many drivers cheat on their logs. Because most truck companies pay their drivers by the mile, drivers do whatever they can (or fraudulently report whatever they can) to maximize the amount of distance traveled in the shortest amount of time possible. This logically leads to one of two results: The driver will speed beyond posted limits, or the driver will fail to accurately report the amount of time actually worked or driven on his daily log.  After all, time is money right?

    Truck Driver Log

    Click here for an example of a truck driver log.

    On its face, this log looks like it is compliant with CFR §§ 395.3 and 395.8. The driver spent less than 11 hours driving for the day, and was on duty, but not driving, for only a half hour. This means the driver spent less than 14 total hours on-duty for the day. But remember, truck accident attorneys are not interested in what the driver said he did that day, we’re interested in what he really did that day leading up to the crash with our client.

    Buried within this log are dozens of questions that must be fleshed out in discovery. Take a closer look at Mr. Doe’s on duty (not driving) reporting: He spent 15 minutes performing a pre-trip inspection in Little Rock, Arkansas at 6 a.m., and loaded for only 15 minutes in Corsicana, Texas. There could be hundreds of small details left off Mr. Doe’s on-duty (not driving) status, that a truck accident attorney can highlight:

    *  Did Mr. Doe spend any time refueling?

    *  Did Mr. Doe really only take 15 minutes to perform his inspection?

    *  Is that time adequate for a thorough inspection?

    *  Did Mr. Doe spend any time speaking to dispatch?

    *  How did he communicate with dispatch?

    *  Did Mr. Doe spend any time securing his load?

    *  Did Mr. Doe spend any time cleaning his rig/trailer?

    *  How much time did Mr. Doe spend at Corsicana waiting to get loaded?

    *  15 minutes seems pretty quick, doesn’t it?

    *  Did Mr. Doe spend any time waiting in line behind other drivers?

    If Mr. Doe responds “yes” to any of these questions, chances are, the driver has misrepresented the amount of time he’s actually spent on-duty. The log that’s been presented to his carrier (and the federal government) is admittedly incorrect, and now Mr. Doe’s credibility has been seriously called into question. The time that’s not being reported has probably been spent driving, making Mr. Doe in excess of his 11-hour driving limit, or working, in excess of his 14-hour on duty limit.

    Congratulations! With proper knowledge of the rules, and careful analysis of the driver’s log, we’ve uncovered at least some evidence that a truck driver was fatigued leading up to the accident.

    In the next few weeks, I will explain 11 more Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration rules and how they’re integral to the success of your truck accident cases. These will be principles the defense cannot dispute, and easy for the jury to understand. Read Thursday for some information on the physical qualifications of drivers.

    –    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious truck accident injury cases. He is on the board of governors for the Association of Plaintiffs Interstate Trucking Lawyers of America and past president of the American Association for Justice Truck Litigation Group. Recently, he was named a Michigan Lawyers Weekly Leader in the Law for his efforts to promote truck safety.

    – Photo courtesy of Creative Commons, by dchousegrooves

    Related information:

    Help for Attorneys Handling Truck Accident Cases

    Find the Dirt on Unsafe Truck Companies in Michigan

    Do I Have a Truck Accident Case?

    Attorney Video: 5,000 Americans Killed in Truck Accidents

    Michigan Auto Law exclusively handles car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state of Michigan. We have offices in Southfield, Sterling Heights, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Detroit to better serve you.

  • Rules of the Road Every Truck Accident Lawyer Needs to Know

    Any lawyer who assumes a commercial truck accident case is simply a “car wreck” case with bigger policy limits is bound to commit legal malpractice. In trucking cases, the federal government imposes hundreds of regulations that essentially, create theories of strict liability against the truck driver and the trucking company.

    Without knowledge of these regulations, a lawyer cannot possibly recover top value for his clients after a serious truck accident case.

    Next week, I’ll be teaching at an American Association for Justice seminar, “Litigating Truck Crash Cases,” in New Orleans. I will review a dozen of what I consider to be the most important Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration Regulations, and how they’re integral to handling a truck accident case the right way.  Several hundred truck accident lawyers from across the country are attending the four-day conference.

    If you’ve ever been to a trucking seminar before, you’ve probably heard the litany of discoverable materials that must be preserved and requested by lawyers in serious trucking cases. This advice is important, but the “why” is often missing. For example, what good is having a  carrier’s Qualcomm data if truck accident lawyers don’t know the regulations regarding speeding and hours of service?  I could go on, but my point is this: If you don’t know the “why” – the most important, the most critical regulations – all the  preservation letters and discovery requests won’t be very effective.

    Throughout the next few posts, I’m going to share the “rules of the road” I’ve developed for truck accident lawyers. I know many of our regular readers are defense lawyers and insurance adjusters, so I won’t be sharing all my tips. But my hope is that the following few posts will help provide a meaningful framework for lawyers conducting legal discovery in truck cases.

    My “why” is simple. Today, one in every three trucks on the road in so dangerous a condition that it would be placed immediately out-of-service if inspected. It’s the lawyers specializing in truck cases who are doing the most to make trucking companies in America safer. Unfortunately, many attorneys don’t have a lot of experience with truck cases, and if I can help just a few – or better yet, a few hundred, then hopefully we will be saving lives and making our roads safer for our families.

    Keep an eye out for my next blog, on rule No. 1 – Hours of Service Regulations.

    –    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious truck accident injury cases. He is on the board of governors for the Association of Plaintiffs Interstate Trucking Lawyers of America and past president of the American Association for Justice Truck Litigation Group. Recently, he was named a Michigan Lawyers Weekly Leader in the Law for his efforts to promote truck safety.

    – Photo courtesy of Creative Commons, by Ryan Holst

    Related information:

    Do I Have a Truck Accident Case?

    Michigan Bad Trucking Companies

    Truck Accident FAQs

    Video: No Punitive Damages in Michigan

    Michigan Auto Law exclusively handles car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state of Michigan. We have offices in Southfield, Sterling Heights, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Detroit to better serve you.

  • Symptoms of Traumatic Brain Injury and Concussion After a Car Accident

    Michigan TBI lawyer says ERs and doctors frequently miss head injuries, lists signs so you can protect yourself

    It’s a sobering fact: Emergency rooms will miss up to 85 percent of traumatic brain injuries after a person has been in a car accident. Our TBI lawyers have witnessed cases where a catastrophically brain-injured person literally walked away after a car crash, without even an ambulance or ER visit, only to become permanently disabled with a brain injury.

    Remember the tragedy of Natasha Richardson last year. She fell on a bunny hill while skiing, and then resumed skiing only to succumb to a fatal brain injury. This demonstrated a person can suffer a traumatic brain injury serious enough to kill, and yet function very well for hours and sometimes days afterward.

    Early TBI is often not detected by traditional MRI or CT scans because the brain actually goes into a hyper-metabolic state as it tries to protect itself after a trauma. There is an uptake of glucose that masks many of the symptoms. But symptoms often worsen over time, causing further injury and brain damage.

    Symptoms of traumatic brain injury may not appear for hours or days following a brain injury.  Often, they are missed entirely for weeks afterward, because people may look fine on the outside, even though they start acting and feeling differently. Meanwhile, doctors usually tend to the more obvious personal injuries, like broken bones and soft-tissue injuries. It can take months before these people are referred to a specialist for complaints based upon brain injury symptoms.

    That being said, it’s important for victims of car and truck accidents to be very aware of how they’re feeling after a crash. Our TBI lawyers have listed some of the symptoms of TBI and concussion below, so you can be your own best medical advocate.

    Common Symptoms of TBI

    Physical:
    * Chronic headaches or neck pain;
    * Feeling exhausted all the time;
    * Mood changes;
    * Changes in sleep patterns;
    * Light-headedness, dizziness, or loss of balance;
    * Nausea;
    * Increased sensitivity to lights and sounds;
    * Blurred vision or tired eyes;
    * Loss of sense of smell or taste; and
    * Ringing in the ears, called tinnitus.

    Cognitive:
    * Difficulty remembering, concentrating or making decisions;
    * Slowness in thinking, speaking, acting or reading;
    * Getting lost or easily confused;
    * Difficulty focusing;
    * Depression; and
    * Anxiety.

    Visit the TBI section in my web site for a more detailed account of traumatic brain injury symptoms. There are non-neurological and neurological symptoms, as well as cognitive and behavioral symptoms. TBI may result in physical impairment, but the more common consequences involve the accident victim’s cognition, emotional functioning and behavior.

    Concussions, or closed-head injuries, on the other hand, are a little more clear-cut.

    Symptoms of a Concussion

    Immediate:
    •    Loss of consciousness;
    •    Impaired attention: vacant stare, delayed responses;
    •    Slurred or incoherent speech;
    •    Lack of coordination;
    •    Disorientation;
    •    Emotional reactions out of proportion; and
    •    Memory problems.

    Later signs:
    •    Chronic headache;
    •    Dizziness/vertigo;
    •    Poor attention and concentration;
    •    Memory problems;
    •    Nausea or vomiting;
    •    Fatigue easily;
    •    Irritability;
    •    Intolerant of bright lights and loud noises;
    •    Anxiety/depression; and
    •    Disturbed sleep.

    As you can see, many of the symptoms of traumatic brain injury are the same as a concussion. If you are noticing these symptoms, it’s important to consult your doctor and a neurologist.

    If you have been in a car accident and suspect you have a traumatic brain injury, you can always call Michigan Auto Law for a free consultation, at (800) 777-0028. Our lawyers will fight to protect you, and help get you the care needed to put the pieces back together.

    –    Steven M. Gursten is a member of the American Association for Justice Traumatic Brian Injury Group and the Sarah Jane Brain Project. Steve received a trial verdict of $5.65 million for a TBI victim; the largest reported auto negligence verdict in Michigan for the year.

    – Photo courtesy of Creative Commons, by skidrd

    Related information:

    Steps TBI Victims Must Take After a Car Accident in Michigan

    What is Traumatic Brain Injury?

    Documenting Traumatic Brain Injury for a Jury

    Help for TBI Lawyers: Aiding Clients with Brain Injury

    Michigan Auto Law exclusively handles car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state of Michigan. We have offices in Southfield, Sterling Heights, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Detroit to better serve you.

  • The Heart of Being a Personal Injury Attorney in Michigan

    Detroit Lawyer to Share Experience with Wayne State University Law School Students

    Tonight I will  be speaking to a Wayne State University Law School trial advocacy class, taught by Michigan Court of Appeals Judge Elizabeth Gleicher. As a personal injury attorney specializing in car accidents, I’m going to be sharing real-life advice with the law students on how to be a successful litigator and trial lawyer. I plan to use a mock auto accident case.

    Greg Gromek of Plunkett Cooney will be speaking on how he would defend the case from an insurance defense perspective.

    Whenever I teach law school students, I always stress that personal injury law can be incredibly rewarding. It’s why so many of us wanted to become lawyers to begin with – to really help people. To make a difference in people’s lives.  I can honestly say I have touched the lives of hundreds of people over the last 16 years, and I’ve helped people who lost everything and were depending on me to protect them. It’s incredibly gratifying.

    Most of Michigan Auto Law’s clients are seriously injured or are mourning a loved one that’s been seriously injured or killed. They’ve lost so much — medical benefits, wage loss, and they are in pain every day and may never be able to return to work. They’re depending on us to help them recover and live again.

    I’m going to tell the students tonight that there’s a lot to learn about the technical aspect of representing victims of car accidents and truck accidents, but a strong desire to help people must be the foundation for any good personal injury attorney.

    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious car and truck accident injury cases and automobile insurance no-fault litigation. Michigan Auto Law has received the largest reported jury verdict for an automobile accident case in Michigan in seven of the past 10 years, including 2009, according to published year-end verdicts and settlements reports.

    Related information:

    Help for Attorneys Handing Auto Accident Cases

    Do I Have a Car Accident Case?

    Car Accident FAQs

    Michigan Auto Law is the largest law firm exclusively handling car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state. We have clerkship opportunities for law students. Call (800) 777-0028 for more information; or if you’ve been injured in an auto accident, and would like to speak to an attorney.

  • A Very Dangerous Supreme Court, Sponsored by Exxon Mobil

    Michigan Car Accident Lawyer Says Unlimited Corporate Spending on Elections Will Corrupt Democracy

    The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision that allows unlimited corporate political spending on elections is so dangerous that I cannot resist sharing my political views on the topic. I’m just a civil justice lawyer.  But since I specialize in helping people in catastrophic accidents such as very serious car accidents and truck accidents, what the conservative judges did is very alarming.

    The reasoning of this decision is inherently flawed and the consequences are detrimental to the public good.

    In politics, there is very often a “public good.” In other words, there is an act or legislation that will benefit many.  And too often, that “public good” is ignored — defeated by narrow special interests that give large sums of money to influence political candidates. Ask most people what frustrates them most about politics, and it seems the influence and power that lobbyists and special interests have on frustrating what is clearly the public’s best interests ranks at the top.

    And now it’s about to get so much worse.

    While conservative talk radio always rails against “activist judges” (read liberal), claiming they ignore binding law,  our current Supreme Court, dominated as it is by conservative Republican appointees, has done far worse by now allowing almost unlimited corporate donations in politics.

    This is the clear message: The current U.S. Supreme Court has now reversed rulings by previous Supreme Courts, and has decided that Jefferson and our Founding Fathers wanted giant corporations to have the same political rights as any individual citizen. Among those rights is now the ability to spend unlimited amounts of money to affect the outcome of political elections.

    So much for a government of, by and for the people. Who knew that we would have a government of, by and for insurance companies and big corporations?

    Consequences Hit Close to Home: Michigan Courts

    In Michigan, the consequences have trickled down to our own Supreme Court.  I look at the damage here caused by four conservative, ideological justices. Michigan has no punitive damages, and as a result trucking companies are more dangerous and hire more unsafe truck drivers than in other states that punish companies for negligence.

    Insurance companies treat people terribly in Michigan, because we also do not have bad faith laws to protect them. Think of it like this, considering New Orleans just won the Super Bowl on Sunday: If State Farm and Allstate Insurance Company still face exposure for hundreds of millions of dollars in claims denied in bad faith in Louisiana after Hurricane Katrina (which they do), these insurance companies can now spend millions of dollars to elect politicians who are more interested in campaign donations than protecting the rights of those who are poor and usually don’t vote in elections.  If a candidate wants to hold these corporations accountable, or judges are to rule in a pending legal case, they can spend millions to recall that politician or unseat that judge.

    I have watched how in the past 16 years, a majority of four Michigan Supreme Court justices — elected by the insurance industry — followed an activist, political agenda and gutted decades of existing Michigan law that has made the state more unsafe. They have essentially dismantled our entire civil justice system.

    No one can compete with special interest money as it is in politics. The public good has and continues to be ignored on so many clear-cut issues. Now, in a huge body-blow to our Constitution and the future of this great nation, special interests can run endless commercials, negative ads, and robocalls to influence future elections.

    It’s astonishing that these justices seem to believe politicians are not corrupted by big money.  Did we not just witness how only a few U.S. Senators who take millions of dollars from health care and insurance companies can completely obstruct health care reform in the U.S.? And this is with the Obama administration making a deal with Big Pharma, knowing they could never compete with the money and political power that Big Pharma has — even though just letting insurance companies negotiate across state lines for pharmaceuticals would save billions of dollars that could benefit every American citizen.

    You can read a recent New York Times article for its take on the dire political consequences of the bitterly divided 5-4 decision. Judges Kennedy, Scalia, Thomas, Roberts and Alito threaten to fundamentally cripple the democratic process in America.  Shame on them.

    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious car and truck accident injury cases and automobile insurance no-fault litigation. Michigan Auto Law has received the largest reported jury verdict for an automobile accident case in Michigan in seven of the past 10 years, including 2009, according to published year-end verdicts and settlements reports.

    Related information:

    3 Challenges Facing Michigan Car Accident Attorneys Today

    Dealing with Your Auto Insurance Company

    Mistakes that Can Kill Your Car Accident Case

    Michigan Auto Law is the largest law firm exclusively handling car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state. We have offices in Southfield, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. Call (800) 777-0028 for a free consultation with an auto accident attorney. We can help.

  • No Excuse to Celebrate Michigan Insurance Company Gouging

    Car Accident Lawyer Responds to Remark by Insurance Institute of Michigan on Obscene, Unregulated Auto Insurance Profits

    An engaged reader recently inquired about a blog I wrote last year on the regulation of Michigan auto insurance rates. Donna wanted me to elaborate on a comment I made, as she was seeking an expanded perspective from a car accident lawyer.

    In discussing another round of auto insurance reform bills highlighting the dire need to clean up our no-fault system and support countless injured people who are  abused by the insurance companies that are supposed to protect them, I said:

    “Michigan law does not require people to purchase GM cars or Google stock, or punish them with civil fines and criminal misdemeanors when they choose not to buy. But every driver must pay for basic auto no-fault insurance to cover their car or truck in Michigan.”

    Here’s my response to Donna:

    Thank you for your comment. The statement you ask about was in response to a comment by Pete Kuhnmuench, executive director of the Insurance Institute of Michigan. When asked about record-breaking insurance company profits in Michigan, Mr. Kuhnmuench said he did not apologize for such high profit margins: “When GM or Google makes a profit, we celebrate it. Profit is not a dirty thing, it’s a good thing.”

    My point is simply this: Unlike GM or Google, Michigan law does not require people to purchase GM cars or Google stock.  Since Michigan law does require all Michigan residents to purchase auto insurance, and they will face civil fines and criminal misdemeanors if they drive a car without insurance, it is an unfair and ridiculous comparison.

    In Michigan, every driver must pay for basic auto no-fault insurance to cover their vehicles in the event of a car accident or truck accident. If people are going to be required by law to purchase insurance, then the profits that these Michigan insurance companies rake in (which are much higher than in other states) should also be regulated.

    Again, it’s an unfair comparison for the Insurance Institute of Michigan to celebrate high profits by comparing a product that people are legally forced to purchase with GM or Google. Finally, note that Michigan is one of the only states remaining in the country that does not regulate the profits that insurance companies make.  For a product that we are all legally compelled to purchase, that certainly can — and does — lead to insurance company abuse.

    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious car and truck accident injury cases and automobile insurance no-fault litigation. Michigan Auto Law has received the largest reported jury verdict for an automobile accident case in Michigan in seven of the past 10 years, including 2009, according to published year-end verdicts and settlements reports.


    Related information:

    How to Read Your Auto Insurance Policy

    Important Insurance Coverage Issues

    Video: What No-Fault Insurance Benefits Are Available?

    Michigan Auto Law is the largest law firm exclusively handling car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state. We have offices in Southfield, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. Call (800) 777-0028 for a free consultation with an auto accident attorney. We can help.

  • Michigan Auto Insurance Companies Use Stonewall Tactics to Block Reform

    Insurance companies resort to robocalls in attempt to shield industry from accountability

    I would like to say kudos to Michigan State Rep. Ellen Cogen Lipton (D-Huntington Woods), who recently blasted auto insurance companies for 11th-hour attacks on lawmakers who are trying to hold the insurance industry accountable and helping make insurance more affordable. As an auto accident attorney, I dedicate my life’s work to protecting those injured in crashes, and I take it personally when insurance companies take advantage of my clients. Lipton is highlighting this serious issue.

    She said the insurance industry has had many opportunities to engage in reform efforts with the Michigan Insurance Consumer Advocate Melvin Butch Hollowell, since Butch began holding hearings on insurance reform in 2008, and the Governor pushed for insurance reform during her State of the State speech last year. Instead, Michigan automobile insurance companies have attacked all reform proposals, ignored efforts at dialogue with the Insurance Consumer Advocate, and are now engaged in robocall smear campaigns.

    Lipton issued a statement from Lansing:

    “I am appalled that auto insurance companies continue to try spread misinformation and use scare tactics to try and block these reforms, but I will not be deterred from bringing accountability to this industry.”

    Lipton, who sponsored a bill in the plan that allows the Insurance Commissioner to deny excessive rate increases, added: “Michigan residents are required to purchase auto insurance, so it is only fair that we have the tools in place to protect them from arbitrary and excessive rate increases. The auto insurance industry has received special treatment for far too long at the expense of our residents. It’s time to stand up for Michigan residents and give them the consumer protections they deserve.”

    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious car and truck accident injury cases and automobile insurance no-fault litigation. Michigan Auto Law has received the largest reported jury verdict for an automobile accident case in Michigan in seven of the past 10 years, including 2009, according to published year-end verdicts and settlements reports.

    Related information:

    Michigan No-Fault Video: Benefits

    Three No-Fault Challenges Facing Car Accident Lawyers

    Why is My Auto Insurance So Expensive?

    Michigan Auto Law is the largest law firm exclusively handling car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state. We have offices in Southfield, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. Call (800) 777-0028 for a free consultation with an auto accident attorney. We can help.

  • How To Try A Car Accident Case in Michigan

    Attorneys from Michigan Auto Law Teaching Personal Injury Lawyers at Trial Institute

    Three auto attorneys from Michigan Auto Law will be volunteering to help educate Michigan personal injury lawyers from throughout the state during the Michigan Association for Justice (MAJ) first annual Trial Institute. The trial institute is in Southfield this week.

    Faculty members Steve Gursten and Dave Christensen will speak on opening statements and cross examination of the defense “independent” medical examiner as part of the auto track. The auto track is geared toward lawyers handling truck accident and car accident cases in Michigan. There will also be an employment law and a medical malpractice track.

    Bob Raitt and Steve Gursten will also be faculty for the Trial Institute, helping the students as they present opening statements, cross-examinations and closing arguments. The intensive two-day program is aimed at improving trial skills for attorneys of all levels.

    The Michigan Association for Justice is an organization comprised of 2,000 consumer protection and personal injury lawyers who fight to protect working families when they are injured in auto accidents, by unsafe products, or by other peoples’ negligence.

    Bob Raitt is past president of the Michigan Association for Justice. Steve, who has served for 15 years on the MAJ Executive Board, also has chaired the MAJ Automobile Accident No-Fault Committee. Dave has served for more than 10 years on the Executive Board. He will be President of the State Bar of Michigan Negligence Law Section this fall.

    Steve, Dave and Bob are all Michigan Auto Law partners. They speak and volunteer extensively for legal organizations and trial lawyers – in Michigan and throughout the country.

    Michigan Auto Law is the largest law firm exclusively handling car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state. We have offices in Southfield, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. Call (800) 777-0028 for a free consultation with an auto accident attorney. We can help.

    Related information:

    13 Ways to Boost the Value of a Car Accident Case

    Handling Low Car Damage Defense

    Video: Do I Have an Auto Accident Case in Michigan?

  • Universal Condemnation for Auto Law in Michigan: It’s Not Just Car Accident Lawyers

    To follow-up on a recent blog on my own impressions of the Michigan Supreme Court hearing on McCormick v. Carrier, I’d like to run a comment by C-PAN regarding the McCormick case and why Kreiner v. Fischer is wrongly decided. CPAN, the Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault, is a Lansing-based, bi-partisan organization of medical, consumer and legal groups.

    McCormick is the case that will hopefully change Michigan’s broken auto threshold law, Kreiner— and restore the rights of injured auto accident victims. Here’s what CPAN has to say:

    On Jan. 12, 2010, the Michigan Supreme Court heard oral argument in the case of McCormick v. Carrier – a case where the Court will decide whether to overrule the 2004 decision in Kreiner v. Fischer. The Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault submitted an amicus brief in McCormick and sent representatives to observe the oral argument. Those involved in the process clearly understand the importance of the McCormick case and the significance the decision will have on the future of the Michigan auto no-fault insurance system. Equally important is the significance this case has for all attorneys who truly care about justice in the state of Michigan. Reduced to its essence, the case is all about the following:

    Shocking Numbers of Failed Auto Accident Cases with Real Personal Injuries

    It was noted by one of the justices that CPAN’s brief referenced the fact that, through September 1, 2009, there had been approximately 246 Court of Appeals decisions implementing the Kreiner decision, with the victim losing 196 times. This justice inquired about the numbers before Kreiner, but unfortunately, no one had the information readily available. Those numbers are shocking. The fact is that the Michigan appellate courts have dismissed more victims’ cases during the first five years of the Kreiner era, than the appellate courts dismissed during the first 31 years of the Michigan No-Fault Law! [There were approximately 150 total appellate court decisions during the first 31 years of the no-fault law, which are broken down as follows: approximately 25 during the 10-year advisory opinion era; approximately 85 during the four-year Cassidy era; and approximately 40 during the 10-year DiFranco era.]

    The Ignored Reality of Kreiner

    Hopefully, after a thorough review of the briefs, the Supreme Court will issue an opinion that will be based upon a fundamental reality that was simply ignored by the Kreiner decision. That reality is this: the 1995 threshold is clearly not a codification of the Cassidy decision. On the contrary, it is a more relaxed threshold than Cassidy for three fundamental reasons: (1) the 1995 law utilizes a more lenient subjective life impact test rather than the more stringent objective life impact test used by Cassidy; (2) the 1995 law does not adopt the definition of the statutory element of “objective manifestation” that was in effect during the Cassidy era; and (3) the 1995 law does not require a separate finding of “seriousness” as was required during the Cassidy era. The reason these three elements of Cassidy were not incorporated into the 1995 threshold is because the Legislature opted to comprise between a DiFranco type threshold and a Cassidy type threshold that would then become a part of a larger auto tort reform package that included two other serious limitations on the rights of victims to pursue non-economic loss clients. Neither of which excited during the Cassidy era: (1) the new comparative negligence rules; and (2) the new uninsured victim disqualification. In spite of this unassailable reality, the Kreiner decision has turned the 1995 law on its head by making the threshold more restrictive than it ever was under Cassidy. This is demonstrated by the fact that the plaintiff in Cassidy (who had a broken leg that did not require surgery and healed without complications) was found to have suffered a serious impairment of body function as a matter of law, while the plaintiff in McCormick (who suffered a more severe leg fracture requiring two surgeries, the inability to work for over a year, and permanent residual consequences) was found not to have suffered a serious impairment of body function under a less restrictive threshold than was adopted by the Cassidy case.

    Kreiner: Clearly Michigan Judicial Legislation

    Hopefully, after a thorough review of the briefs and listening to the argument of counsel, the Supreme Court will issue an opinion that will characterize the Kreiner decision for what it clearly is: a classic example of judicial legalization. This is made abundantly clear when the language enacted by the Legislature is compared to the language contained in Kreiner. The differences are stark. When the Legislature adopted the 1995 threshold, it defined “serious impairment of body function” exactly the way it wanted that term defined – by using four specified elements chosen by the Legislature. Those elements are: (1) objective manifestation; (2) body function importance; (3) ability impairment and (4) normal life impact. The Legislature could have, but did not, adopt the radical defining elements decreed by the Court in Kreiner; i.e. course or trajectory, entire normal life, whole life, generally unable, for the most part unable, extensive and pervasive, etc. The fact that all of these words are conspicuously absent from the 1995 threshold speaks volumes. The Legislature did not enact these legal rules – the justices who decided the Kreiner case did. Furthermore, it is clear that when it drafted the 1995 definition of “serious impairment of body function.” The Legislature did not insert any specific durational elements into that definition. Nevertheless, duration is something that can be considered by judges or juries regarding the Legislature’s requirement that an injury be one that affects the person’s “normal life.” Therefore, if an injury or impairment lasted for a trivially short period of time such that no reasonable thinking person could conclude that the injured person’s normal life had been affected, then the claim will fail because of the inability to satisfy the statutory normal life element.

    Restoring the Right to Jury Trial

    Hopefully, the experience of the last five years will convince the Court that the Kreiner decision has resulted in the wrongful denial of the right to trial by jury. The Supreme Court should immediately restore that right. It has long been the law in Michigan that judges can decide cases by summary disposition only if summary disposition is appropriate under the court rules (MCR 2.116(C)(10)). This court rule prohibits summary disposition unless “there is no genuine issues as to any material fact, and the moving party is entitled to judgment or partial judgment as a matter of law.” Moreover, this court rule constitutionally trumps any legislature that is inconsistent with its provisions. As a result of the decision in Kreiner, lower court judges have dismissed cases that would not have been appropriate for dismissal under the court rules governing summary dispositions. It is hoped that the Supreme Court will recognize that most threshold issues arising under the 1995 law are for juries to decide, not for judges. Our citizen jurors, properly instructed, can do just as good a job as the judges who have been deciding these issues over the last five years – frequently in a way that has resulted in little consistency. Nevertheless, there is still a role for judges to play in deciding threshold issues. It is the same role judges have been playing since the adoption of the no-fault law 36 years ago – if a claim is so trial or frivolous that no reasonable thinking juror could conclude the injury constitutes serious impairment of body function, the case becomes one that “breaches permissible limits,” this making it appropriate for decision by the judge.

    Universal Condemnation for Kreiner

    Never before in the 36-year history of the Michigan no-fault law has there been a legal issues that has produced such a consensus of opinion as Kreiner. Almost the entire “no-fault world” has expressed universal disapproval of the Kreiner decision, concluding that it is not only legally wrong, but that it has severely disrupted the delicate balance that is essential to preserving and protecting the Michigan auto no-fault law. This fact is abundantly clear by the position taken by CPAN – the Coalition Protecting Auto No-Fault. CPAN is a bipartisan coalition of 26 major medical, consumer and legal groups that has consistently and persistently voiced its strong criticism of the Kreiner decision and worked vigorously to seek its reversal.

    In addition to CPAN, the Michigan Insurance Commissioner has filed an excellent amicus brief in the McCormick case echoing CPAN’s call for a reversal of Kreiner and agreeing with CPAN’s analytical criticism of that decision. The associations who are members of CPAN include:

    Michigan Academy of Physician Assistants; Michigan Assisted Living Association; Michigan Association of Chiropractors, Michigan Association of Rehabilitation Organizations; Michigan Brain Injury Providers Council; Michigan College of Emergency Physicians; Michigan Dental Association; Michigan Health and Hospital Association; Michigan Home Health Association; Michigan Nurses Association; Michigan Orthopedic Society; Michigan Orthotics and Prosthetic Association; Michigan Osteopathic Association; Michigan Rehabilitation Association; Michigan State Medical Society; Brain Injury Association of Michigan; Disability Advocates of Kent County; Disability Network of Michigan ; Michigan Association for Justice; Michigan Citizen Action; Michigan Paralyzed Veterans of America; Michigan Partners for Patient Advocacy; Michigan Protection and Advocacy Service; Michigan State ALF-CIO; Michigan Trial Advocates; and UAW Michigan CAP.

    In truth, it seems that only no-fault insurance companies defend the Kreiner decision. They defend it because it allows them to collect premiums while not having to pay seriously injured victims of auto accidents. The nearly universal condemnation of the Kreiner decision is power confirmation that the time has now come to overrule it.

    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious car and truck accident injury cases and automobile insurance no-fault litigation. Michigan Auto Law has received the largest reported jury verdict for an automobile accident case in Michigan in seven of the past 10 years, including 2009, according to published year-end verdicts and settlements reports.

    Related information:

    Dealing with Auto Insurance Companies

    17 Mistakes that Can Kill Your Car Accident Case

    What is Kreiner v. Fischer?

    Michigan Auto Law is the largest law firm exclusively handling car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state. We have offices in Southfield, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. Call (800) 777-0028 for a free consultation with an auto accident attorney. We can help.

  • The Problem of Normal ERs in Traumatic Brain Injury Cases

    What happens when Michigan no-fault law and real-life medicine conflict?

    Our attorneys tell people that the law in Michigan is black and white: Anyone injured in a car accident must provide information as to the nature or type of injury to his auto insurance company within one year, or the insurance company can deny payment for medical bills and other no-fault benefits (MCL 500.3145(1)).

    It’s very easy to comply with a one-year notice provision when there is a physical injury like a broken arm – after all, it hurts immediately and upon X-ray, it’s either there or it isn’t. Notice for a tangible injury like this on an application for benefits to an auto insurance company can be easily made.

    But in real life, some personal injuries aren’t always as cut and dry.

    What happens when you have a very serious injury, such as a traumatic brain injury or reflexive sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), which can’t be so easily and quickly diagnosed?  A recent case, Jory Magness v. Frankenmuth Mutual Insurance Company , shows how dangerous – and absolutely disastrous – it can be to have an injury that clashes with the artificial constraint of the strict one-year notice of injury requirement.

    Magness was released on January 19, 2010 as an unpublished decision by the Michigan Court of Appeals. In Magness, a child was injured in an auto accident.  The child was taken by ambulance to the hospital emergency room.

    However, subsequent notice to the insurance company indicated medical treatment was rendered for a “shoulder bone bruise.” While there was a vague reference to the existence of another injury, no detail was provided. There was no information about a brain injury or head trauma sustained in the accident, and no other notice was provided until the insurance company began to receive bills for medical treatment rendered for a traumatic brain injury shortly after the one-year had passed under the notice provision of the statute.

    The Court found that no diagnoses of TBI was made in the emergency room.

    The Normal ER: No Reference to Brain Injury or Head Trauma

    Today, there are respected studies showing that hospital ERs routinely miss traumatic brain injuries — up to 80 percent of them.  So the Court’s findings that no diagnosis of TBI was made in the ER really means nothing.

    Why do hospitals miss so many brain injuries?  Doctors now understand that the brain actually goes into a hyper-metabolic state as it tries to protect itself after an injury. There is an uptake of glucose and therefore, especially in the acute phase of a traumatic brain injury, this uptake of hypermetabolic activity actually masks many of the symptoms of brain injury.

    The injured brain makes the routine questions and gross neurological examination seem normal.

    Detecting Brain Injury Symptoms

    As anyone who watches the news or has a young child knows, doctors warn families for days and weeks after an accident to watch out for possible symptoms of brain injury, even if it is a child just getting his “bell rung” playing sports without losing consciousness. Symptoms to watch for include nausea, headaches, problems with memory or concentration, sleepiness and vomiting.

    But with a child,  problems of early detection are even harder.  Unlike adults, a young child is not challenged with activities that would highlight deficits caused by a TBI early on.  In other words, a child isn’t confronted with enough sufficient challenge on a daily base, either academically or through work, where cognitive impairments or other signs of brain injury will surface. That’s why so many pediatric brain injury doctors compare the brain injuries of children to the holes in a barrel: They won’t begin to manifest themselves until the water reaches a certain level in that barrel, where they become noticeable. In some cases, this can take years.

    Delay in Diagnoses = Delay in TBI Treatment

    Unfortunately, a delay in diagnosis also means a delay in treatment.  And in the child’s case in Magness, this took just over a year. That late notice ran smack dab into the notice required under MCL 500.3145(1).  The child’s auto insurance company was able to dismiss the child’s claim for medical care because the notice was not made within the one year.

    Sadly, the child, who could possibly have made an excellent recovery if challenged with top-notch medical care, now has a brain injury and no one to pay for expensive treatment, even though it can still make a huge difference in his life.

    This tragic decision is a good example of why law must have a heart, as well as a brain.  It highlights the dangers when three judges on the Michigan Court of Appeals (who probably have no real-life personal injury legal experience or medical background) apply the cold black letter law of a statute requiring strict legal notice to a minor with a traumatic brain injury.

    Hopefully, this case will serve as a warning to any parent or lawyer who even begins to suspect there may be a brain injury after a car accident.  However, the child was a minor in this case, and I can only wonder how many other young and completely innocent children will continue to fall into the same hole that the child plaintiff did in Magness.

    –    Steven M. Gursten is a member of the American Association for Justice Traumatic Brian Injury Group and the Sarah Jane Brain Project. Steve received a trial verdict of $5.65 million for a TBI victim; the largest reported auto negligence verdict in Michigan for the year.

    – Photo courtesy of Creative Commons by taberandrew

    Related information:

    Help for Lawyers Handling Traumatic Brain Injury Cases

    Steps TBI Victims Must Take After an Auto Accident

    14 Factors that Can Ruin a TBI Case

    The Hidden but Deadly Brain Injury

    Michigan Auto Law exclusively handles car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state of Michigan. We have offices in Southfield, Sterling Heights, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Detroit to better serve you.

  • New Rule for Truck, Bus Drivers: No Texting

    Truck Accident Lawyer Says Drivers Who Text Are 20 Times More Likely to Crash

    According to the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration, drivers take their eyes off the road for an average of 4.6 seconds out of every six seconds while texting. FMCSA research shows drivers who text are more than 20 times more likely to get in an accident than non-distracted drivers.

    Our truck accident lawyers are happy to announce that drivers of commercial trucks and buses will be prohibited from texting under federal guidelines that U.S. Secretary of Transportation Ray LaHood issued Tuesday.

    “We want the drivers of big rigs and buses and those who share the roads with them to be safe,” LaHood said in a statement. “This is an important safety step, and we will be taking more to eliminate the threat of distracted driving.”

    The prohibition is effective immediately. Truck and bus drivers who text while driving commercial vehicles may be subject to civil or criminal penalties of up to $2,750, the Department of Transportation said in a news release.

    The release did not offer specifics on how the prohibition will be enforced.

    Cracking down on distracted drivers has been a focus of LaHood’s since he took office last year.

    In September, he convened a two-day summit on the issue in Washington. The Department of Transportation recently launched the Web site distraction.gov to raise awareness of the dangers of distracted driving. And this month, LaHood and National Safety Council President Janet Froetscher announced the creation of the advocacy group FocusDriven, a nonprofit that supports the families of distracted driving victims, modeled after Mothers Against Drunk Driving.

    Nineteen states, plus the District of Columbia and Guam, have passed laws banning texting while driving. Six states, plus the District of Columbia and the Virgin Islands, ban the use of handheld devices while driving.

    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious car and truck accident injury cases and automobile insurance no-fault litigation. Michigan Auto Law has received the largest reported jury verdict for an automobile accident case in Michigan in seven of the past 10 years, including 2009, according to published year-end verdicts and settlements reports.

    – Photo courtesy of Creative Commons, by cupcake2

    Related information:

    Truck Driver Support

    Safe Driving Around Trucks

    10 Foods to Avoid While Driving

    Truck Rules and Regulations

    Michigan Auto Law is the largest law firm exclusively handling car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state. We have offices in Southfield, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. Call (800) 777-0028 for a free consultation with an auto accident attorney. We are always here to help.

  • A Better Way To Try A Car Accident Case: Tell the Jury About Insurance

    A reader recently wrote in after reading my blog on the Dirtiest Insurance Company Trick of All. “Phil” stated that in the very serious car accident case I had written about, Farm Bureau Insurance company had every right to deliberately mislead the jury (I assume Phil is not a claims adjuster who works for Farm Bureau).

    Actually, I really appreciate Phil’s comments and I am sure there are many people feel the same way as he does. That’s why I decided to re-post his comment and my response as today’s blog.

    In the Farm Bureau case, a teenager caused a very serious car accident  — yet Farm Bureau Insurance refused to make any meaningful attempts to settle, and literally forced this case to trial. Farm Bureau made very low-ball offers to settle far below what the case was worth, saying that a jury would be swayed by the appearance of this young, apparently penniless teenager. And since juries cannot be informed about the existence of insurance, Farm Bureau and the defense lawyers assumed the jury would return a low jury verdict.  Meanwhile, the actual insurance policy covering the teenage driver was large, and paid for by the girl’s father (Read here for information on why you should avoid Farm Bureau auto insurance).

    Here’s what Phil wrote:

    I have to disagree with your assessment of this case, at least as it’s recounted, in a couple of ways. First, the “real” defendant in this case was, most certainly, the teenage girl. Individuals bear their own responsibilities. Individuals enlist the services of insurance companies to cover losses for which they become legally responsible.

    Second, I don’t see how this law was misused. I support regulations like this. Juries should never take the depth of a defendant’s or, for that matter, a plaintiff’s pockets into consideration when determining judgments or judgment awards. It seems that we’ve all forgotten that when an insurance company is involved, it’s not just a faceless corporation, it’s every individual policy holder, that’s at risk.

    This is my response to Phil’s opinion:

    I certainly appreciate your comments, and I thank you for e-mailing them to me.  I also certainly understand where you are coming from and there will be many who agree with you.  I do respectfully wonder, however, if you would feel the same way if the insurance company had pulled the same trick on you if you had been catastrophically injured, or if this had happened to someone you love.

    The idea of an insurance company deliberately parading a penniless teenage girl in front of a jury every day to engage in a charade that she will be personally ruined by a verdict (especially when there is very large insurance policy) and to improperly encourage people sitting on a jury to feel sorry for her seems wrong to many, including myself. It also deprives the truly innocent person of his full opportunity for a just verdict that is meant to protect them for all of their hams and losses.

    There is however, another way.  There is a new idea out there. The principle is that juries and the people who sit on them are sophisticated enough to be told there is insurance involved. These people can then be trusted to not lose all self-control and still be able to render a fair and just verdict based upon the evidence. They as a jury are then instructed not to consider the existence of insurance when reaching a verdict.

    This is the idea behind a growing trend in some progressive jurisdictions across America. It started several years ago in Alaska. The idea behind this is that it allows juries to then focus on their real job – to determine the appropriate amount of compensation without worrying or improperly being urged to speculate about whether there is or is not insurance, or about the ability of a defendant to pay. I certainly think it’s an idea that has considerable merit, and is more fair to both plaintiffs and defendants than the current way we do things in Michigan.

    As a personal injury attorney specializing in auto accidents, I have seen too many innocent people whose lives have been destroyed by people who feel as Phil does.  On the other hand, I’ve also seen defendants and insurance companies get burned by using this tactic. For example, in the case mentioned above, the plaintiff, who sustained a traumatic brain injury among many other serious injuries and who received a paltry settlement offer of $100,000, was rendered a verdict of more than $2 million.

    I’d like to thank Phil for his comment, and while I may disagree with him, I appreciate the opportunity for intelligent dialogue on a subject that I feel is very important.

    Steven M. Gursten is recognized as one of the nation’s top experts in serious car and truck accident injury cases and automobile insurance no-fault litigation. Michigan Auto Law has received the largest reported jury verdict for an automobile accident case in Michigan in seven of the past 10 years, including 2009, according to published year-end verdicts and settlements reports.

    – Photo courtesy of Creative Commons, by Ken Lund

    Related information:

    Dealing with Your Insurance Company

    Your No-Fault Rights in Michigan

    Top 10 Worst Insurance Companies in Michigan

    Michigan Auto Law is the largest law firm exclusively handling car accident, truck accident and motorcycle accident cases throughout the entire state. We have offices in Southfield, Detroit, Ann Arbor, Grand Rapids and Sterling Heights to better serve you. Call (800) 777-0028 for a free consultation with an auto accident attorney. We are always here to help.