Author: Teddy Partridge

  • Sunday Late Night: Sheriff Haley Barbour sez Criticism of Bob McDonnell a “nit” that “doesn’t amount to diddly”

    This is probably not the helpful boost Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell was looking for from Mississippi Governor, former RNC head and grandpappy of K-Street pay-to-play lobbying Haley “prototypical Southern Sheriff” Barbour, a guy who calls himself a ‘fat redneck with an accent.’

    Shorter Haley: Our Mississippi legislature marks Confederate History Month annually, and they’re Democrats (mostly) plus we have a Confederate Memorial Day in Mississippi. Isn’t Virginia just like Mississippi, dad-gum-it? *ptui* [chaw hits spittoon]

    As Bob McDonnell, the new faux-moderate face of the oh-not-so-racist GOP, hoped that the whole controversy over his slavery omission that he’s serially apologized for and re-edited his Confederate History Month proclamation to accommodate, had gone away, here’s the guy Central Casting would send any movie director who asked for a “Southern Sheriff” type, despite being a megamillionaire after inventing pay-to-play K-Street lobbying and a stint as Chairman of the RNC:

    Asked by anchor Candy Crowley if McDonnell’s resolution was a mistake, Barbour said, “I don’t think so.”

    “I don’t know what you would say about slavery, but anybody that thinks that you have to explain to people that slavery is a bad thing–I think that goes without saying,” he said, adding “Maybe they should talk to my Democratic legislature, which has done the exactly same thing in Mississippi for years…I’m unaware of them being criticized for it.”

    As for the criticism McDonnell faced, including from President Obama, Barbour said: “It’s sort of feeling that it’s a nit, that it is not significant, it’s trying to make a big deal out of something that doesn’t amount to diddly,” he also said.

    Hey, Haley — this is called giving legs to your buddy’s dogwhistle just when he’d hoped the howling was over. McDonnell managed to reach out to the racists within his party, piss off Virginia moderates, and then piss off the racists with his retraction/apology/editorial tour. He just wants it to go away.

    “It’s a lasting scar mainly for its combination of stupidity, insensitivity and ignorance about the civil war,” said one senior [GOP] party strategist granted anonymity to speak candidly. The source did add, however, that McDonnell “has a lot of time to make amends and put it behind him.”

    So, in the spirit of making amends, Bob McDonnell’s spokesman, GOP Tucker Number Seventeen, didn’t even mention the omitted-slavery proclamation in his ‘response’ to Sheriff Haley:

    Governor Haley Barbour is a tremendous leader for Mississippi. Governing Magazine named him Governor of the year in 2006 for good reason. He has led his state’s recovery from Hurricane Katrina, focused on economic development and job creation, reformed the public education system and put Mississippi at the forefront of alternative energy research and development. We thank him for his leadership and service to the state and country

    Shorter Bob McDonnell: Haley’s Republican Governors Association helped elect me over the hapless Creigh Deeds, and the RGA is probably the only game in town given Michael Steele’s fuckups, but ix-nay on the avery-slay oclamation-pray, okay Sheriff?

    (And btw: When she pressed Sheriff Haley for an answer, Candy Crowley showed how it’s done.)

  • FDL Movie Night – Chat With RFK Historian Thurston Clarke About History Channel’s Kennedy Smearfest

    Thurston Clarke, author of The Last Campaign: Robert F Kennedy and 82 Days That Inspired America and FDL Book Salon guest, contributed to a Brave New Films campaign to ask The History Channel to re-think its decision to purchase right-winger Joel Surnow’s “bio-pic” miniseries The Kennedys. Mr Clarke has been kind enough to chat for 90 minutes with FDL readers today about his findings from reviewing the script.

    Right-wingers love to tear down the Kennedys; it’s one of their favorite sports. And smearing a central figure in America’s pantheon of Democratic leaders, John F Kennedy, is crucial. If they can reduce the regard with which JFK is held by Americans, the contribution of subsequent family members is correspondingly reduced, in their view. Even further, Democratic party values like encouraging scientific exploration, a strong role for our federal government in civil rights enforcement, and robust diplomacy as a pillar of our national defense: all these are rooted in the Kennedy presidency.

    But in a non-reading era when many Americans get their history from television, and trust The History Channel to bring us a true version of events, should The History Channel air a flawed, prurient, and untruthful docu-drama like Surnow’s?

    Much like Theodore Sorensen, a first-person witness to conversations portrayed in the script that never actually happened, Thurston Clarke debunks a critical scene between President and Mrs Kennedy, which simply could not have occurred:

    We have a scene during the Berlin Crisis, again in 1961, when Jackie has this confrontation with him and says, “I’m gonna take the kids and go to the Cape.” He tries to keep her prisoner in the White House, and this is a big long scene. It’s an important scene in the screenplay; it’s trying to make him out to be this controlling figure and Jackie as someone in a prison who wanted to get out of the White House.

    She was already in Cape Cod all summer. She wasn’t in the White House during the Berlin Crisis. He was going up to Cape Cod every weekend to see her. It is a complete and utter fabrication, something made up that bears no resemblance to the truth but is presented to put him in the worst possible light.

    Complete and utter fabrications don’t belong on The History Channel, do they?

    As a historian, Thurston Clarke is broken-hearted by the presentation of fiction as historical fact:

    If you are a historian and you care about the truth, this is very hard stuff to read. And if it is filmed the way it’s written, it will be just heart-breaking.

    Mr Clarke warns us that the anniversary of the Kennedy presidency is beginning this year. Alarmingly, this smear job may be the first in a salvo of attempts to tear down the Kennedy presidency, and with it the values it brought forward in American discourse.

    And I think this is an effort to derail and tarnish Kennedy before we get to these fiftieth anniversary memorials to his presidency. And I think that is what this is about.

    Which raises, I think, a very important point: what are the historical sources for these fictional accounts? Who are the witnesses to these conversations that never occurred? What primary documents and eyewitness reports have been used, or misused, in developing this flawed script? What artificial timelines have been developed to justify the fictions central to the narrative?

    And what is any of this doing on The History Channel, anyway? Can historians make a claim of truthfulness on content produced for The History Channel? What expectations should all Americans have that what we see on The History Channel is fact-based?

    Please welcome Thurston Clarke in comments; please keep questions and commentary civil and to-the-point of the subject at hand. Thank you!

    (To join the Brave New Films campaign to Stop the Kennedy Smears, go here.)


  • Sunday Late Night: Poor Conservatism, Failed Again

    Poor conservatism, the philosophy that cannot fail.

    Conservatism in America, you see, can only be failed. It is so robust, so natural, so flowing-from-our-Creator — that it can never fail. But its practitioners, those who pretend to be conservatives, those who co-opt it for their own ends?

    They fail conservatism, and America is so bereft for that failure. Because then, sometimes, Americans think the unthinkable: that conservatism has failed. Which, of course, is unpossible. So — the hunt is on! What faux-conservatives can be identified now? What pretenders have absconded with the conservative mantle?

    What usurpers have failed conservatism this time?

    Craig Shirley and Donald Devine, longtime conservative operatives and Reagan hagiographers (hereinafter referred to as Shirley Devine, a name John Waters will surely co-opt soon) have identified the most recent failers-of-conservatism, on Fred Hiatt’s funny pages today. You might be surprised to know who they are.

    Karl Rove. And his boss, George W Bush.

    That’s right — the architect of the eight disastrous years of the Bush presidency “is no conserative.” And neither is his boss. Shirley Devine count off Karl Rove’s four pillars of the Bush presidency, and expose them as rank betrayals of the modern American conservatism of Buckley, Goldwater and Reagan.

    Middle-class tax cuts? JFK did that, so it’s not rooted in pure conservatism.

    Faith-based initiatives? Just leveling the playing field for access to the ever-expanding federal trough, and started by Jimmy Carter. Hardly conservative at all.

    Education? No Child Left Behind trampled states’ rights. Good goal, badly executed.

    Entitlements? A $9.4 trillion unfunded Medicare prescription drug benefit, the largest federal liability since LBJ. Oh, and a big F for not privatizing Social Security.

    Then, Shirley Devine proceed to pick apart further betrayals of conservatism that were central to the Bush Administration (even though we didn’t hear much about how bad they were from conservatives at the time):

    And we all remember steel tariffs, the creation of the Department of Homeland Security, the McCain-Feingold campaign finance law, a massive agricultural subsidy bill, and other spending and regulatory moves by the Bush administration that tilted power toward Washington and away from individuals and states.

    So, America, do you think conservatism has failed because of the failures of Karl Rove and George W Bush? Well, you’re wrong — it hasn’t. In fact, the failures you ascribe to Karl Rove and the Bush Adminstration aren’t due to conservatism at all. Those failures are, in fact, simply due to one simple fact about Rove’s and Bush’s brand of conservatism (that no conservatives bothered to point out to us at the time):

    It is not modern conservatism, not the brand that today is finding voice in the “tea party” movement, and certainly not the populist conservatism that found electoral success beginning in the late 1970s.

    See, Rove and Bush were an aberration. Buckley, Goldwater, and Reagan are populist; they are finding their voice again in the “tea party” movement (love those scare quotes, Shirley Devine! As if we don’t know what the “tea party” is: a GOP-aligned, DC-controlled, lobbyist-staffed exploit-the-rubes project, centrally managed and corporately funded).

    Anyway.

    So, citizens! When modern conservative GOP candidates knock at your door to ask for your vote this November and again in November 2012, remember this message from Shirley Devine: American discomfort with and alienation from the failures of Karl Rove’s plan for the Bush Administration to usher in a Permanent Republican Majority? Those are NOT objections to conservatism.

    Rove and Bush are not conservatives.

    You should, in fact, probably vote for the conservative this fall. Because conservatism hasn’t yet been tried in the 21st century! America ought to take it out for spin — real, modern American conservatism, populist conservatism, not that phony compassionate, big-government, Nixon/Ford/Rove/GWB conservatism.

    What America needs, right now, really and truly, is real conservativism, not the failures of those who preached conservatism but failed it. (And if you’d like to copy that down from an AEI conference abstract and write it up like Shirley Devine did, Fred Hiatt can easily find you prime WaPo OpEd real estate to make your case).

    Conservatism: it never fails. It can only be failed. And Karl Rove and George Bush, tossed in the GOP memory hole by Shirley Devine, are conservativism’s latest betrayers.

    Never thought you’d see the day, did you?


  • Reagan on the Fifty? Not Hardly

    reagan food stamp

    by twolf1

    Miniature not-gay engaged-to-a-woman North Carolinian, Congressman Patrick McHenry, has proposed replacing Civil War General and hero of the Union Army Ulysses S Grant with the 20th century politician who began his 1980 presidential campaign in Philadelphia, Mississippi, the site of the 1964 murders of civil rights workers James Chaney, Andrew Goodman and Michael Schwerner, with a “state’s rights” speech.

    The national uproar over these lynchings culminated in the passage of the civil rights acts one month later, and Ronald Reagan’s visit to this small backwater sixteen years later was no accident. The speech was his very first after being nominated by the GOP for president, and became known as the ’state’s rights speech’ for its naked appeal to disaffected Southern whites.

    The Washington Post’s William Raspberry wrote of this speech upon Reagan’s death:

    It was bitter symbolism for black Americans (though surely not just for black Americans). Countless observers have noted that Reagan took the Republican Party from virtual irrelevance to the ascendancy it now enjoys. The essence of that transformation, we shouldn’t forget, is the party’s successful wooing of the race-exploiting Southern Democrats formerly known as Dixiecrats. And Reagan’s Philadelphia appearance was an important bouquet in that courtship.”

    Wee McHenry’s bill to adorn a new fifty dollar bill with St Ronnie’s likeness has drawn 17 Congressional co-sponsors, mostly also Southern, as well as the vociferous objections of members of the Ohio GOP: Grant is a home-state hero.

    State Representative Danny R. Bubp, a Republican from the district that includes Mr. Grant’s birthplace in Point Pleasant and childhood home in Brown County, is preparing a resolution that would oppose the currency change.

    “The Union may not have won the Civil War had President Lincoln not had the wisdom to put Grant in charge,” Mr. Bubp said. “He was just the kind of guy who needed to be there at that time, and we should not diminish his place in history.”

    The tiniest Congressman, seeking accord with his Ohio GOPmates, doesn’t want this debate to be about partisanship, which is why he chose the fifty (he says):

    Mr. McHenry denied that he had any animosity toward Grant. “Every generation needs its own heroes,” he said. “One decade into the 21st century, it’s time to honor the last great president of the 20th and give President Reagan a place beside Presidents Roosevelt and Kennedy.” Franklin D. Roosevelt’s image is on the dime, and John F. Kennedy’s is on the half-dollar.

    Mr. McHenry chose the $50 bill in part to remove partisanship from the debate by replacing one Republican president with another, said his chief of staff, Parker Poling.

    It is the metamorphosis of the GOP from the party of hope for freed slaves and all African-Americans into the party of Reagan who hearkened back to Jim Crow, lynching and segregation, that enables McHenry’s disingenuous elision of partisanship. Because, of course, it is mostly ‘liberals’ who object to the replacement of Grant with Reagan, since we object to his policies. But, despite that, isn’t there a place for Reagan on some piece of American currency?

    Congressman McHenry, let me be the first liberal to agree with you that America should honor the contributions of Ronald Reagan’s divisive and destructive economic policies, still felt across the land in the 21st century’s Great Recession and Jobless Recovery. Americans should recognize and remember these horrible and longstanding effects of ‘trickle-down’ ’supply-side’ faith-based Church of Chicago pain-causing fiscal policies. And his naked appeal to race-based discrimination and divisiveness, dressed in California geniality and befuddledness.

    America can put Ronald Reagan’s face on food stamps, or (as they are known in our acronym-loving era) USDA SNAP EBT cards. That way, whenever Americans of any color need help from our government to feed themselves and their families, they and the merchants who accept the card will be reminded of the president who would have stripped away that help and all similar benefits.

    Put Ronald Reagan on food stamps.

  • Sunday Late Night: Son of Erick Grows Up!

    Erick Son of Erick, CNN’s newest affirmative action hire in the pasty racist demagogue demographic, displays the courage of his convictions in the face of Howard Kurtz’s relentless probing:

    On calling Obama White House spokesperson Linda Douglass ‘the Goebbels of health care:’

    I probably shouldn’t have said that…. I got her confused with one of the Congressmen…. I got my wires crossed that day…. I probably shouldn’t have [gone down that road] but I did….

    On his prediction that ‘Obama’s harpy wife would go Lorena Bobbit on him should he even think about shagging hookers behind the media’s back:’

    I’ve learned…. I don’t have to get personal in blogging to make my point. I’ve definitely evolved over time.

    On calling David Souter ‘the only goat-fucking child molester ever to serve on the Supreme Court:’

    That was about the dumbest thing I’ve done…. Some good came out of it! It was the first time I realized, Howard, that what I do affects my family, too — having my three-year old heckled and booed in the front yard by a neighbor, having my wife be berated at her office… I always thought I was just a guy chatting with friends on Twitter, and I realized I’d reached a point where people listen to what I say!… It was a wake-up call to me that I had to grow up in how I write.

    On asking ‘at what point do people march down to their state legislators office, take him aside and beat him to a bloody pulp:’

    The point is valid, but the Left may not like it…. We’re reaching a point where reasonable people are gonna get kinda crazy with government intrusion into their lives.

    ‘Are you going to make your points on Red State without these kind of personal attacks?’

    Yeah I think so, I’ve definitely had to grow up over time… Everyone understands you talk with friends and among friends in ways you don’t talk in public… in some ways when you talk about things in public and in private you sometimes use different languages. I’ve definitely had to grow up and realize that I am someone now on a national stage and a platform. What I say and write affects not just myself and my family but others.

    So, to review:

    1. Youthful indiscretions (all within the last two years)
    2. People actually read my shit? Who knew?
    3. Gotta save the crazy for my close peeps
    4. My family and I are the victims

    Listen in vain for the words ‘apologize’ or ‘regret’ or ’sorry’ issue from Erickson’s maw. With the exception of his Goebbels comparison to Linda Douglass (if you listen carefully, you’ll hear that his real mistake was that he mistook her for another, not his Nazi analogy) none of this is regrettable. None of his targets deserve an apology. He is sorry for none of it. No mistakes made.

    This is the level of violent and unapologetic discourse CNN has decided to bring into its public square and hand its million-dollar megaphone. John King’s USA is clearly not mine. Is it yours?

    DumpCNN on Twitter and Facebook.


  • Liveblog: House Floor Debate on Health Care Bill (Four)

    Rep. Donna Edwards (D-MD)

    Continued live-blogging of the House floor debate on health care bill today as the Energy and Commerce Committee time ends and the Ways and Means Committee time begins.

    Chairman Sander Levin (MI): Discusses patient stories, says “Republicans have turned their backs on Americans.  This will make our beloved America a better nation.”

    Ranking Member Dave Camp (MI): The American people know you can’t create a brand new trillion dollar entitlement program without expanding the deficit.  Kill the bill!

    Levin yields to Charlie Rangel: “One of my lowest points in my political career was yielding my chairmanship of the Ways and Means Committee.  I did not want to do anything that might distract from this historic bill, and I am now, when people ask, How are you today?  This is one of the most historic moments on my life….

    Donna Edwards realizes she has a difficulty — both the controllers of time are gentlemen from Michigan!

    Wally Herger: “The American people don’t want to raid the treasury to cut Medicare and pay for abortions!”

    Levin: Mr Stark will submit a statement, yield to Georgia’s John Lewis: “We have a moral obligation to recognize that health care is a right, not a privilege, the American people need health care and they need it now.  Stand with the American people!  Give the American people a victory! Give health care a chance!”

    Edwards gavels the applause for Mr Lewis.

    Sam Johnson, TX: “I for one know what is the America I want — freedom from a two trillion dollar takeover, freedom from explodoing debt.  What kind of legacy do you want to leave?  Will you cave in to Speaker Pelosi?”

    Neal, MA: This is the most significant day, MAdame Speaker.  Insurance companies can’t discriminate based on pre-existing conditions.  Kids can stay on their parents’ plans until they are 26.  No one has defended Medicare and Social Security better than Democrats — I don’t think you can believe the GOP.

    Brady, TX: The cost has gone up, it takes two months to see a doctor, now the government rations care — this isn’t the future, this is MA today.  Higher costs, lower care, rationing.  This is why America is saying no to Obamacare.

    Tags: , ,

  • Liveblog: House Floor Debate on Health Care Bill (Two)

    Rep. Louise Slaughter (D-NY)

    Jesse Jackson Jr bringing the gavel today.

    Demanding the YEAs and NAYs on 15-minute vote on point of order.

    CSPAN has now cut away to the kill-the-bill demonstrations on the Capitol grounds today.

    We’ve now come back from the “fifteen-minute” vote.

    Based on the earlier schedule, the House appears to be taking two hours for every hour allotted to debate. We are at 4pm eastern, when they scheduled this to be completed at 3pm eastern.

    On MSNBC, awaiting the arrival of the Forced-Birth King, Bart Stupak, who will tell us what deal he’s agreed to for his vote for this bill. Unless he’s going to vote against it!

    Lawrence O’Donnell now lauding his MSNBC colleague Chris Matthews for understanding ten months ago that health care reform would all come down to abortion. No mention of Matthews berating Alan Grayson for saying earlier this year that reconciliation would be the parliamentary method used to pass health care reform.

    The House is not waiting for the conclusion of Bart Stupak’s press conference. JJJ at the gavel again.

    Louise Slaughter relating yesterday’s events: spitting, racist comments, homophobic comments. “Anger is not just contained to the Capitol Grounds — last week someone threw a brick through my office window in my district!”

    Slaughter recalling FDR’s language on good health being essential to the safety and security in our nation. Inequality of health care by region, economic status. “to prevent and care for sickness and disability, loss of ability to work among workers, care for children and mothers” — this is a reminder that the eyes of history are watching us. This should be our guidepost.

    Truman, Clinton invoked now, along with Richard Nixon’s efforts. “Our final bill may end up being less progressive than the one Nixon proposed many decades ago” — sing it, Louise!

    Slaughter giving the broad strokes of the majority’s views of the bill, CBO score, coverage expanded. That 1.3 trillion in the second decade is a talking point they absolutely love.

    “We are here today to do our job — I consider the Rules Committee to be the kitchen of the House of Representatives, and I am proud to be the cook.”

    Dreier up now: “what happened yesterday on the grounds of the Capitol was totally unacceptable.” Is this the first GOP denouncement of actions of the teapartiers against Cleaver, Lewis, Carson, and Frank?

    Dreier: “We will hear story after story that is a tragedy — this ill-conceived bill is such a lost opportunity for a bipartisan solution. Speaker Pelosi argues that the American people care more about the product than the process. And she is right! The public was outraged by tactics to avoid an actual bill, but people are really outraged by its effects!” [we won the battle on deem-and-pass, so we’re back to hating on the bill itself]

    Dreier says this will gut Medicare and Medicare Advantage, cut HSAs until they are worthless. Do the GOPs understand that, you know, the Louisiana Purchase is already actually a, um, thing?

    Tags: , ,

  • LGBTs Join List Democratic Interest Groups Tossed Under Health Care Reform Bus

    The crazy bus rolls over another constituency (photo: bunchofpants via Flickr)

    Gays get thrown under the bus with women, Hispanics, public option and single-payer supporters, community colleges, and student loan borrowers. I thought it might be possible to enact health care reform without LGBTs having to take one for the team, but no:

    Today, the House Rules Committee released the reconciliation bill through which it will vote on the measure that passed the Senate in December. We are deeply disappointed that, after months of lobbying for their inclusion, important measures specifically addressing the needs of LGBT people and people with HIV – ending the unfair taxation of employer-provided domestic partner health benefits, permitting states to offer early HIV treatment under Medicaid, collecting critical health data on LGBT people and addressing discrimination in health care – are not a part of this bill. On a mixed note, this bill restores $50 million to fund failed abstinence-only sex education programs, but also provides $75 million for comprehensive programs that also address the prevention of teen pregnancy and sexually transmitted diseases. According the House leadership, a vote on this measure is scheduled for Sunday afternoon.

    So — on the day when our community members demonstrated coast to coast for our rights to fair employment and military service, isn’t it great to know that LGBTs have also made the sacrifice expected of every left-leaning element of the Democratic coalition?

    You like us, you really like us! I was beginning to think we’d been overlooked, but not this time! Kinda crowded under this bus, though….

    Tags: , , ,

  • Prop 8: Perry v. Schwarzenegger – 16 March Liveblog

    prop.large[Ed. Note: FDL continues its team coverage of Perry v. Schwarzenegger–including more legal analysis, court documents, videos, and liveblogging direct from the federal court in San Francisco. You can find it all on our dedicated Prop 8 page.]

    Good morning! We are in Judge Vaughn Walker’s San Francisco courtroom again this morning; today at 10am Judge Walker will hear an appeal of Magistrate Judge Spero’s order regarding disclosure of materials from anti-Prop 8 groups, specifically Equality California (EQCA) executive director Geoff Kors.

    First thing this morning (9:30am pacific time) Judge Walker is dealing with an unrelated criminal matter. I’ll begin liveblogging the Perry v Schwarzenegger appeal hearing as soon as it begins.

    Criminal matter running a little long; as of 10:10 Judge Walker is still hearing the criminal matter.

    10:25 criminal matter concluded; court taking break now.

    12:20PM: Hearing concluded.

    Lots of so-so lawyering from ACLU and EQCA as well as some crisp responses from Desseau (Plaintiffs take no position on the order to compel disclosure) and the P-I attorney. A number of good questions from Judge Walker, specifically with regard to the where the “clear error” of the magistrate’s order is. I’m not sure either ACLU or eQCA attorneys showed any error at all, although they argued the merits a lot.

    Plaintiff-Intervenor thinks since they had to provide docs, so should these parties, although they are “syympathetic” to the first amendment arguments, having made and lost them with regard to their own doc production.

    Finally, the ACLU attorney tried to get some more words in edgewise at the end, to very little sympathy from Judge Walker. At the end of this attempt, the ACLU attorney agreed with Dousseau that this would endanger the wonderful, awesome schedule Judge Walker kept for the entire trial, since this magistrate’s order would certainly be appealed to the full Ninth Circuit.

    Judge Walker did not appear to be pleased to be reminded of the several times the Ninth Circuit has overruled his orders in this case, and said “Thank you” and left the bench.

    Shortly thereafter, the Clerk announced that Court was in recess. Chatting with lawyers afterwards, no one seems to think today’s activity made a verdict appear any sooner, although there was some discussion that we could get one or two weeks advance notice of a date for closing arguments.

    Stay tuned!

    Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  • Sunday Late Night: Dosh Garn It, That Smells Like Accountability!

    Ignoring the examples of other sex-scandalized GOP officeholders — such as United States Senator John Ensign of Nevada, South Carolina Governor Mark Sanford, United States Senator Larry Craig of Idaho and United States Senator David Vitter of Louisiana — Kevin Garn, the Majority Leader of the Utah State House, resigned Saturday after admitting he paid $150,000 hush money to a woman with whom he cavorted nude in a hot tub 25 years ago.

    Twice.

    When she was 15 years old.

    And worked for him.

    GOP Leader Garn introduces an exciting new era of accountability for scandal among GOP officeholders. He breaks a long streak of stubborn and unaccountable clinging to office. No one expected David Vitter to survive the revelation that his name was in the DC Madame’s black book, and that New Orleans sex workers recall him as Diaper Dave — but there he is, even leading in his re-election race. No one expected Mark Sanford to stay in the Governor’s office after his Appalachian Trail and Argentina admissions. Everyone took Larry Craig at his word that he would resign his Senate seat after being caught in a men’s room sex sting in the Minneapolis airport, but instead he served out his entire term. And aren’t we all amazed that John Ensign is still hanging on to office after the incredible revelations of jobs-as-bribes-for-silence and $100,000 hush-money gifts to the family of his staffers, one of whom he canoodled with while cuckolding the other?

    Kevin Garn may very well have broken whatever spell the media has put over GOP sex scandals, by resigning. Suddenly, it appears that YES! Something is expected of GOP politicians who violate the customs and norms of civilized society, who pay bribes to women for silence, who violate their marital vows while building a career on being family-friendly to only some families, and who illustrate the best of 21st century hypocrisy.

    Resignation. Shunning. Exile from the public discourse.

    Let’s hope Kevin Garn’s almost-unique* step, as a GOP, of actually resigning his office wakes up our media. So that when the next pervert is revealed (and you know another one will be, perhaps soon) we can encourage our wise media gatekeepers and say, “Hey, Kevin Garn resigned, shouldn’t he too?”

    *UPDATE: Maybe there’s something about Utah, since their Senate Majority Leader resigned from office in January after a drunk-driving arrest, something California’s Roy Ashburn appears not to be considering.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,


  • And Your Objection Is?

    Senatus Populusque Romanus – Incedio Consumptum Restituit : loosely translated as "The Senate and People of Rome restored what fire had consumed" (photo: Xerones via Flickr)

    GOP Senators threaten that using reconciliation to pass health care reform, or student loan reform, would be the end of the Senate as we know it.

    Lindsay Graham, in Politico (sorry, no link):

    “Many Republicans who were ready to pull the trigger on the nuclear option on judges are now glad they didn’t,” Graham said. “This place would have ceased to function as we know it. If they do health care through reconciliation, it will be the same consequence.

    GlueHorse McCain:

    “To go to the 51 votes, instead of this traditional 60 in the United States Senate, will have cataclysmic effects.”

    John Thune promises flying fur:

    “If they go down that road, I think the fur is going to fly,” Senate Republican Conference Vice Chairman John Thune (S.D.) said. “I suspect that there is going to be an awful lot of resistance, and we will exercise our prerogatives so that the rules of the Senate are respected.”

    Judd Gregg (who you’ll note is identified in the approved Village manner as Obama’s first choice as Commerce Secretary in this WaPo segment)…

    “That would be the Chicago approach to governing: Strong-arm it through,” said Sen. Judd Gregg (R-N.H.), who briefly considered joining the Obama administration as commerce secretary. “You’re talking about the exact opposite of bipartisan. You’re talking about running over the minority, putting them in cement and throwing them in the Chicago River

    All this dire Senate dysfunction! Imagine the United States Senate thrown off its smoothly running processes! Just think, the Senate might actually pass something!

    These superannuated, pampered snotwaggles are so out-of-touch, they think their empty threat that the Senate as we know it would end is a BAD thing. For the American people, that is an outcome devoutly to be wished.

    In fact, that’s the point, you mooks.

    Tags: , , , , , , , , ,

  • Sunday Late Night: Amarillo Army of God

    Imagine, if you will, young Muslim men rampaging through an American community exposing people who act in what they view as a sexually licentious manner. Imagine that these young Muslim men acted as a paramilitary organization, terrorizing an entire city by protesting sexually promiscuous gatherings, photographing and publishing license plate numbers, workplace addresses and home locations. Getting people fired from their jobs and blacklisted for hire anywhere else in town.

    Imagine these Muslim warriors created a map of the community, identifying as unholy other religions’ houses of worship, other faith centers, as well as locations where sexual immorality is practiced, in their view. And that they called this map their Spiritual Warfare Map, and they required their members to ‘witness’ the activities therein by actual physical protest.

    Also targeted:

    environmentalists, breast cancer events that do not highlight abortion, Halloween, “spring break events,” and pornography shops

    Imagine if these young Muslim men organized themselves into a group called Army of God. Or, if you will, Repent Infidels!

    Imagine if this Muslim group had called for the boycott of their state’s largest city because a lesbian had been elected Mayor.

    Shouldn’t authorities be worried if an American city had operating in it an Army of God whose call to ’spiritual warfare’ begins like this:

    I am a soldier in the army of my God. The Lord Jesus Christ is my Commanding Officer. The Holy Bible is my code of conduct. Faith, Prayer, and the Word are my weapons of warfare. I have been taught by the Holy Spirit, trained by experience, tried by adversity, and tested by fire. I am a volunteer in this army, and I am enlisted for eternity. I will either retire in this army at the Rapture or I will die in this army.

    Oh — it’s okay for Christians to call themselves the “Special Forces of spiritual warfare?” It’s okay for Christian evangelicals to behave radically in the service of their faith, but not Muslims? We are happy to have Christians imposing their values through threats, violence, exposure at the workplace, and blacklisting? But not Muslims?

    Armies of God are not the American way, unless this country has become a theocracy. We have one Army, the United States Army. And our Army fights for America, not for any single God.

    This is the American Taliban, the American Hezbollah, the American Sharia enforcers. They seek to impose their religion’s strict codes on all their countrymen. They are not exercising free speech; they are imposing religious views upon others, through harassment, intimidation, threats of violence, and what they call ‘warfare.’

    This is religious-based terrorism.

    If our nation is now a theocracy and permits rampaging bands of thugs because they adhere to one religion but not another, we’re in big trouble. Because that doesn’t sound like the America I love.


  • Primary Opportunities Slip Away as Health Care Reform Vote Slides

    (photo: John Morton)

    Something jumped out at me in Jane Hamsher’s diary Friday morning about Lynn Woolsey’s treachery on Public Option: the California filing deadline for primary challenges is March 12th. I wondered: how many state primary deadlines will slip by as the House tries to make Bart Stupak happy? In how many states will progressive activists have to wait until 2012 to challenge Democratic incumbents who vote against women’s health rights and for a mandate to buy private health insurance? Are we losing 2010 accountability?

    The answer is yes.

    Here are the states with filing deadlines that expire between now and Easter, which is April 4th. Passover begins March 26th, and Congress’s Passover/Easter recess is currently rumored to be the House’s new “deadline” for passing the Senate bill. Of course, this would be on the promise of fixes from the Upper Chamber. The thirteen states with expiring primary candidate filing deadlines are:

    Arkansas 3/8
    Oregon 3/9
    Pennsylvania 3/9
    California 3/12
    Nevada 3/12
    Maine 3/15
    Montana 3/15
    Idaho 3/19
    Iowa 3/19
    Utah 3/19
    South Dakota 3/30
    South Carolina 3/30
    Missouri 3/30

    Moving into April, these seven states have primary filing deadlines before May First:

    Tennessee 4/1
    Alabama 4/2
    Virginia 4/9
    North Dakota 4/9
    New Jersey 4/12
    Georgia 4/30
    Florida 4/30

    Fully twenty states’ Democrats will lose the opportunity to file challengers to incumbent Democratic House members who vote to restrict women’s rights or require Americans to buy private insurance.

    I’m pretty sure the Speaker knows this calendar better than I do: this makes me wonder if the current delays are about insulating incumbent Democrats from possible 2010 primary challengers.

    As far as this fall’s election is concerned, where are progressive voters going to go? Without the chance to primary their Congresscritter, Democrats will be stuck supporting the incumbent.

    After all, 2012 is a long time away, with lots of opportunities to make local progressives happier with their representative, right?

    Right?


    h/t: Thanks to FDLer Chris Dietrich for these primary dates!

    Tags: , , , , ,

  • Sunday Late Night: How Did They Name Canada?

    The people living there decided to pull letters out of a bag, like you do to start a game of Scrabble™.

    Well, that’s a C, eh?

    And an N, eh?

    And a D, eh?

    And, more specifically, here’s the top ten reasons to live in Vancouver:

    1. Weed
    2. Two million people and two bridges
    3. The local hero is a pot-smoking snowboarder
    4. The local wine doesn’t taste like malt vinegar
    5. Your $400,000 Vancouver home is 5 hours from downtown
    6. A university with a nude beach
    7. You can throw a rock and hit three Starbucks locations
    8. If a cop pulls you over, just offer them some of your hash
    9. There’s always some sort of deforestation protest going on
    10. Cannabis

    And, to honor the Canadan hockey team which won a Gold Olympics™ medal to the United States of America’s Platinum Olympics™ medal, here’s some Manitoba jokes:

    You know your from Manitoba, Canada, when….

    You only know three spices – salt, pepper and ketchup.

    You design your Halloween costume to fit over a snowsuit.

    The mosquitoes have landing lights.

    You have more miles on your snowblower than your car.

    You have 10 favourite recipes for moose meat.

    Canadian Tire on any Saturday is busier than the toy stores at Christmas.

    You live in a house that has no front step, yet the door is one meter above the ground.

    You’ve taken your kids trick-or-treating in a blizzard.

    Driving is better in the winter because the potholes are filled in with snow.

    You owe more money on your snowmobile than your car.

    The local paper covers national and international headlines on 1/4 page, but requires 6 pages for sports.

    At least twice a year, the kitchen doubles as a meat processing plant.

    The most effective mosquito repellent is a shotgun.

    Your snowblower gets stuck on the roof.

    You think the start of moose season is a national holiday.

    You head south to go to your cottage.

    You frequently clean grease off your barbeque so the bears won’t prowl on your deck.

    You know which leaves make good toilet paper.

    The major parish fund-raiser isn’t bingo – it’s sausage making.

    You find -40C a little chilly.

    The trunk of your car doubles as a deep freezer.

    You attend a formal event in your best clothes, your finest jewelry and your Sorels.

    You can play road hockey on skates.

    You know 4 seasons – Winter, Still Winter, almost Winter and Construction.

    The municipality buys a Zamboni before a bus.

    You actually get these jokes and forward them to all your Northern friends.

    And, finally, for those of you from elsewhere who have a hard time telling Australians, Brits, Canadans, and USAmericans apart, here’s a primer:

    Aussies: Dislike being mistaken for Pommies (Brits) when abroad.

    Canadians: Are rather indignant about being mistaken for Americans when abroad.

    Americans: Encourage being mistaken for Canadians when abroad.

    Brits: Can’t possibly be mistaken for anyone else when abroad.

    Aussies: Believe you should look out for your mates.

    Brits: Believe that you should look out for those people who belong to your club.

    Americans: Believe that people should look out for & take care of themselves.

    Canadians: Believe that that’s the government’s job.

    Aussies: Are extremely patriotic to their beer.

    Americans: Are flag-waving, anthem-singing, and obsessively patriotic to the point of blindness.

    Canadians: Can’t agree on the words to their anthem, when they can be bothered to sing them.

    Brits: Do not sing at all but prefer a large brass band to perform the anthem.

    Americans: Spend most of their lives glued to the idiot box.

    Canadians: Don’t, but only because they can’t get more American channels.

    Brits: Pay a tax just so they can watch four channels.

    Aussies: Export all their crappy programs, which no-one there watches, to Britain, where everybody loves them.

    Americans: Will jabber on incessantly about football, baseball, and basketball.

    Brits: Will jabber on incessantly about cricket, soccer, and rugby.

    Canadians: Will jabber on incessantly about hockey, hockey, hockey, hockey, and how they beat the Americans twice, playing baseball.

    Aussies: Will jabber on incessantly about how they beat the Poms in every sport they play them in.

    Americans: Spell words differently, but still call it “English”.

    Brits: Pronounce their words differently, but still call it “English”.

    Canadians: Spell like the Brits, pronounce like Americans.

    Aussies: Add “G’day”, “mate” and a heavy accent to everything they say in an attempt to be cool.

    Brits: Shop at home and have goods imported because they live on an island.

    Aussies: Shop at home and have goods imported because they live on an island.

    Americans: Cross the southern border for cheap shopping, gas, & liquor in a backwards country.

    Canadians: Cross the southern border for cheap shopping, gas, & liquor in a backwards country.

    Americans: Drink weak, bad-tasting beer.

    Canadians: Drink strong, bad-tasting beer.

    Brits: Drink warm, bad-tasting beer.

    Aussies: Drink anything with alcohol in it.

    Americans: Seem to think that poverty & failure are morally suspect.

    Canadians: Seem to believe that wealth and success are morally suspect.

    Brits: Seem to believe that wealth, poverty, success and failure are inherited things.

    Aussies: Seem to think that none of this matters after several beers.

    Happy End of The Canuckistan Olympics, everyone!

    And — you may now go back to loving San Francisco best of all the West Coast cities.

    Tags: , ,


  • What Democrats Does DanGerstein Consult For, and Why Don’t They Fire Him?

    Longtime Lieberman mouthpiece Dan Gerstein is portrayed in Politico as a “Democratic political consultant” whenever they need someone to run down the Democrats or, as today, tout the Republicans.

    Providing the Village conventional wisdom on The Summit: The Summitting for anyone who missed TradMed’s sloppy coverage yesterday, Politico makes good use of Dan Gerstein in an “across the spectrum” account:

    But in this case, the tie goes to Republicans, according to operatives on both sides of the aisle — because the stakes were so much higher for Democrats trying to build their case for ramming reform through using a 51-vote reconciliation tactic.

    “I think it was a draw, which was a Republican win,” said Democratic political consultant Dan Gerstein. “The Republican tone was just right: a respectful, substantive disagreement, very disciplined and consistent in their message.”

    Who still hires this hack, and how can they defend that now? It’s time for any Democrats — actual Democrats, not Connecticut for Lieberman Independent Democrats from Connecticut — who pay this guy to fire him. He doesn’t speak for any Democrats I know, and his consultant credentials are constantly used to undermine Democratic party efforts.

    Who does Dan Gerstein work for? What Democrats write him checks? And why won’t they fire him, since he commits this kind of political malpractice repeatedly?

    Alternatively — if Dan Gerstein doesn’t consult with any Democrats, why does Politico allow him to self-identify as a “Democratic political consultant?” Has Politico verified that credential lately?

    Tags: , , , , ,


  • Judd Gregg Loved Reconciliation, Defended It on Senate Floor in 2005

    New Hampshire Senator Judd Gregg, who must now be referred to by Village media elites in every instance as “Barack Obama’s first choice for Commerce Secretary,” took time on the floor of the United States Senate in 2005 to school Democrats on how and why reconciliation was entirely appropriate.

    So much for all that idiotic “nuclear option” chatter from the GOP. It sounds like they’ve known all along that reconciliation is regular order, just another Senate rule like any other.

    Just imagine! There was nothing wrong with majority rule in 2005.

    “If you’ve got 51 votes for your position, you win!”

    Thank you, Senator Gregg, Barack Obama’s first choice for Commerce Secretary. This lecture will be very helpful in explaining to your GOP Senate colleagues exactly what the rules of the Senate are.

    Not unethical, just the “rules of the Senate as they are set up to be used.”

    Thank you!


  • Sunday Late Night: Alexander Haig, American Hephaestus

    In our televised American culture, Alexander Haig is likely now best-remembered for his moment in the White House briefing room only hours after President Ronald Reagan was shot at the Washington Hilton on March 31, 1981. After racing up the stairs from the Situation Room, he muttered shakily on live television, to a nation unclear about what had just happened, “I am in control here in the White House….” In the absence of Vice President GHWBush, who was flying back to Washington, and due to rumors that had gone out on the air that ‘no one was in charge in the White House’ the new Secretary of State felt America needed reassurance — and our enemies needed reminding — that the machinery of American government was still operational despite the shooting.

    Alexander Haig was unsuccessful in that moment.

    Once the shock of the assassination attempt wore off, and our President recovered and America focused on Reagan’s horrible economy, we needed laughs. Haig’s shaky, sweaty statement became one source of those laughs. He left the State department the following year, believing he’d lost the President’s confidence in a battle with Defense Secretary Caspar Weinberger and a National Security Council that was to become infamous later in Reagan’s presidency.

    But it was actually one thing Alexander Haig did more than half a decade before this television moment that shaped our current American political landscape and made our country what it is today. Perhaps more than any other American of the twentieth century who was not President, Alexander Haig forged our political culture and set American history on our current, sorry path.

    Hephaestus was the Greek smith-god who forged all the thrones in the Palace of Olympus. Al Haig, American Hephaestus, forged the current view of our American president as invulnerable to accountability for any actions while in office. (Indulge me the alliteration, please; the god is more well-known nowadays as the Roman deity, Vulcan.) Alexander Haig shaped the way we view the Presidency today, and changed the course of history with stern advice he gave a new president just finding his way in the Oval Office after an earlier American tragedy.

    How?

    In 1973, merely one year after his landslide re-election, Richard Nixon lost his impeachment insurance when Spiro Agnew was forced to resign the Vice Presidency in a plea deal to avoid prison for bribery. Busy covering up Watergate and embroiling America in foreign policy machinations to distract from his and his aides’ malfeasance, Nixon settled on the House Minority Leader to be America’s first appointed Vice President: Michigan’s Gerald Ford.

    The process of selecting a Vice President was new; previously, vacancies went unfilled. After John Kennedy’s assassination and LBJ’s ascension, Congress wondered whether it was wise to leave the in-waiting Vice slot unfilled. This problem was especially well illustrated in 1963 by LBJ’s health and that of the 71-year-old Speaker of the House, John McCormack and the 85-year-old president pro tempore of the Senate, Carl Hayden.

    So a constitutional solution was proposed and, only seven years after its ratification, America was now using our brand new XXVth Amendment.

    During his Congressional confirmation hearings, the first ever for a Vice President, Gerald Ford was asked about pardoning his predecessor, should it come to that. Widely interpreted as a promise not to were these words, “I don’t think the American people would stand for it.”

    In retrospect, you can see the wiggle room.

    As Bob Woodward reported in “Shadow,” Alexander Haig sought out Vice President Ford in the chaotic first week of August, 1974, and proposed a Nixon pardon, full and complete, for any and all crimes committed. Ford said the deal wasn’t “consummated” then but shocked the nation five weeks later on a lovely fall Sunday by granting the disgraced ex-President just such a pardon. In truth, he had been right almost a year before: America didn’t stand for it, and his trust with the slowly healing American people was irretrievably broken.

    Jerry Ford, an otherwise decent man who had already told America that “our long national nightmare is over” when he assumed the Presidency, undertook his Nixon pardon path aided by Alexander Haig, who thus forged modern American political culture.

    America was denied a healing process begun when Ford became President. We will never likely know the extent of Nixon’s involvement in Watergate and ‘other high crimes’ because the pardon ended his accountability. Thus began the corruption of America as a nation that can withstand great harm and still survive: we are instead a vulnerable people to be protected from the spectacle of accountability for our leaders’ wrongs. It’s a twisted notion of American exceptionalism: the Executive Exemption from Accountability. It saved Ronald Reagan and GHWBush from impeachment and prosecution for their Iran/Contra high crimes and saved GWBush and Dick Cheney from impeachment and prosecution for their 9/11 negligence and subsequently lying America into war.

    America never trusted Jerry Ford again. He flailed about on economic matters, wrestling alternately with inflation and recession. A gifted athlete, his public stumbles boosted the successful career of comedian Chevy Chase and embarrassed us. A plain mid-Western speaker, Ford’s sometimes garbled syntax opened him up to gaffes that made it appear he didn’t understand foreign policy. All this, but first of all his unexpected, sudden reversal on a Nixon pardon (and lack of press preparation and Congressional consultation) made possible the unlikely presidential candidacy of a Georgian peanut farmer who carried his own suitcase. Jimmy Carter engaged the nation with the simple promise that he would always tell America the truth.

    Carter might not have been elected had Ford not broken trust with the American people so early in his presidency, at Haig’s urging.

    Follow me a few more steps into this political fantasy of Jerry Ford elected to his own presidential term in 1976: recall that he had barely vanquished Ronald Reagan that summer for the GOP nomination, leaving the defeated Reagan a strong candidate for the subsequent 1980 nomination. Elected to his own term, though, a full Ford presidency probably would have resulted in a Democratic win in 1980. Twelve years of the Presidency in one party’s hands usually results in a turnover to the other party, in this case the Democrats.

    Would America have seen President Edward Kennedy take the oath in January 1981? Possibly; but regardless of either nominee we certainly would have been spared a President Ronald Reagan. The outgoing President Ford likely could have controlled the levers of his own party to prevent the 1980 Reagan nomination from ever happening.

    And an America without a Reagan Presidency would be a vastly different America today, wouldn’t it? I submit: a much better one.

    No Reagan Presidency means no Bush Vice Presidency, which means no GHWB Presidency. Which means no Fortunate Son, beholden to and manipulated by Nixon leftovers Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld.

    So raise a glass to the shade of Al Haig, wherever he resides: forger of America’s destiny with one swift strike of his smith’s hammer against the iron will of Jerry Ford’s promise to his country, on the anvil of executive integrity. For better or for worse, no one not elected President did more with a single act to create the circumstances we find ourselves mired in today.

    The legacy of America’s Hephaestus, Alexander Haig: an unaccountable Executive; Ronald Reagan’s presidency; and the disastrous reach into the twenty-first century of Dick Cheney and Don Rumsfeld, returned from the never-extinguished wreckage of the Nixon years to shape America’s destiny as their own.

    Thanks, Al.

  • Evan Bayh Doth Protest Too Much About the Lefty Blogosphere

    Still Senator Evan Bayh (D-IN)

    So, Evan Bayh reached out to Uncle Howard Fineman (in Argentina!) to correct several media myths about his retirement, and Uncle Howard obliged:

    Here’s the gist of his media beef: He thinks the big, mean, lefty blogosphere is unfairly painting him as a bad guy.

    First of all, Democratic party leadership — in the White House and the Senate — shouldn’t have been surprised by Evan’s retirement from his relatively safe Indiana Senate seat, formerly occupied by his dad. Apparently, he’s been whining about his unhappiness to Harry Reid and Barack Obama for a while. And it’s not his fault they didn’t listen:

    He insisted that, for some time, he had been expressing doubts behind very closed doors to the president and Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid.

    “I shared my doubts and concerns with Harry a year ago,” Bayh told me. “And the president and I have been talking about this for months,” he added.

    “I might have made the decision earlier had the president not asked me to reconsider. Which I did. As for the exact timing — well, it’s hard to make a decision until there’s a deadline, and I didn’t face one until just the other day.”

    Anyone who’s listened to Evan Bayh drone on, though, will instantly sympathize with both Reid and Obama — imagine having to hear these complaints endlessly while the speaker simultaneously does all he can to block the President’s agenda. My reaction would be: “So, go already!”

    Further inflating the role of lefty bloggers’ opinions in his decision to leave his likely-safe Senate seat, Evan wants Uncle Howard to know he doesn’t hate:

    In particular, he’s got a problem with two of the tales being told. First, that he was out to get the party and the president. And second, that according to an anonymous quote making the rounds, he “hates” the netroots sites that crusaded against the war in Iraq and for Obama.

    “I didn’t say that and I don’t hate them. I’m not a guy who hates,” contended Bayh.

    The bloggers, he said, will like his blistering criticism of filibuster abuses — and they will like more of what he says in coming months about ways to reform a broken political system.

    Evan also says something that sounds more like a threat than a promise, though. It must have pleased Bayh Official Stenographer Fineman to know this:

    “You should assume that this is not the last chapter in my career in public service,” he said.

    Finally, we learn that Wellpoint Board Member and health-insurance-money-grubber Susan Bayh is very worried about where her hubby will end up, doubtless because his public service has had a pretty direct impact on her attractiveness for these positions:

    “It’s just that, right now, I have no idea what I am going to do. My wife told me she’d really like to know.”

    I wouldn’t want Evan moping around the house, either. And goodness only knows, Susan’s worth to Wellpoint may go way down when Evan leaves office, so better keep him somewhere in the public eye. A desire Susan may share, incidentally, with the family stenographer, Uncle Howard.

  • Sunday Late Night: eMeg Took eBay Backwards; California Too?

    From a San Jose Mercury-News article about the dwindling prospects for Blacks, Latinos, and women in Silicon Valley, we garner this tidbit about GOP gubernatorial wannabe Meg Whitman:

    Take eBay, for example. While the San Jose company declined to make its executives available for an interview, or to share its most up-to-date employment information, eBay said it believes workplace diversity is crucial.

    But the numbers don’t reflect that.

    As eBay’s local work force swelled to accommodate the online retailer’s growth between 2000 and 2005, eBay added 366 managers to its Silicon Valley offices. That net increase included just five additional black managers and no Hispanics.

    At a time when eBay was headed by one of the few high-profile female CEOs in Silicon Valley, Meg Whitman, the share of the company’s managers and top officials who were female declined to 30 percent in 2005, from 36 percent five years earlier, according to federal employment data.

    How forward-looking! Will eMeg’s longing for the California of days yore also involve fewer employment opportunities for minorities and women? But that’s not eMeg’s only look in the rear-view mirror: she has already made clear her plans to take California backwards by immediately suspending our state’s Global Warming Solutions Act (AB32) on her first day in office.

    She also opposes marriage equality, on the basis that’s it a “matter of personal conscience and my faith.” Both of which, of course, should certainly drive public policy. Is it also a matter of her conscience and faith that polluters get a new free pass, and women and minorities are afforded fewer job opportunities?

    eMeg’s first television ad had to be corrected to omit her lie that she has ‘lived in California for thirty years;’ — note she now says ‘the many years I have lived in California.’ She moved here in 1981 but lived in Massachusetts for seven years in the 1990s. California voters should start to worry about just how badly her governorship would retard our state when she says she wants California to “be what it once was.” Blacks, Latinos, women, our breathable air, and gays have suffered or will suffer under her leadership.

    This is a person who has claimed she’ll spend up to $150,000,000 of her own money to become California’s governor. One rival says her campaign adviser tried to roughhouse him out of the primary. Her campaign may have gotten another opponent to swap into a US Senate campaign. eMeg likely recognized the bad optics of two female former CEOs atop the statewide GOP ticket, especially when the other one’s private enterprise experience and campaign so far are such laughable and dismal failures. Now eMeg’s former opponent for the gubernatorial nomination is the frontrunner against Carly Fiorina for the Senate. Was there a deal?

    California has suffered enough under a term and a half of Arnold’s failed stewardship. We can’t have another GOP who promises to run California like a business. Especially the way eMeg has run both her business and her campaign.


  • US Voters Say “Let Gays Serve”

    photo: Jason Pier via Flickr

    In a Quinnipiac poll released today and featured on Tucker Carlson’s new media “empire” The Daily Caller, American voters overwhelmingly favor allowing gays to serve openly in the United States military.

    Homosexuals should be able to openly serve in the U.S. military, American voters say 57 – 36 percent. Voters also say 66 – 31 percent the current policy of not allowing openly gay men and women to serve is discrimination, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released today.

    Oddly, while Americans favor open service, and want Don’t Ask Don’t Tell repealed because two-thirds of them call it discrimination, they seem to favor something I’m going to call Don’t Camp Don’t Butch:

    But by a 54 – 38 percent margin, American voters say gays in the military should face restrictions on exhibiting their sexual orientation on the job, the independent Quinnipiac (KWIN- uh-pe-ack) University poll finds.

    I don’t understand why anyone except sex workers are displaying their sexual orientation on the job, so I guess heterosexual soldiers should face these same restrictions. I mean, who “exhibits” their sexual orientation on the job, anyway? Does that mean you can’t put pictures of your partner up in your cubicle at the Naval Air Station? Or that you can’t wear drag makeup at reveille? No pumps at the Pentagon, gentlemen?

    Go figure. I think this says more about Americans’ attitudes towards sexuality than homosexuality: keep it all in the closet.

    UPDATE: Spencer Ackerman has a great report about the 10th Mountain Division commander’s website open forum for those under his command to state their views about repeal.

    Here’s an excerpt, but please do go read the whole thing:

    Few of the thread’s 77 comments express any hesitation about the repeal’s impact unit cohesion or combat readiness or any other arguments typically used to justify keeping openly gay servicemembers out of the military.