Author: WhiteHouse

  • President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts, 2/23/10

    02.23.10 02:47 PM

    WASHINGTON – Today, President Barack Obama announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to key administration posts:

    Stephen T. Ayers, Architect of the CapitolEduardo M. Ochoa, Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education, Department of EducationDeborah Loewenberg Ball, Member, National Board for Education Sciences, Department of EducationAdam Gamoran, Member, National Board for Education Sciences, Department of EducationBridget Terry Long, Member, National Board for Education Sciences, Department of EducationMargaret R. (Peggy) McLeod, Member, National Board for Education Sciences, Department of EducationPresident Obama said, “I am grateful that these impressive individuals have chosen to join my administration at this important time for our nation. I look forward to working with them in the coming months and years.”

    President Obama announced his intent to nominate the following individuals to key administrations posts:

    Stephen T. Ayers, Nominee for Architect of the Capitol
    Stephen T. Ayers is Deputy Architect of the Capitol and Chief Operating Officer, a position he has held since 2005; he has served as the Acting Architect of the Capitol since February 2007. He previously served as Superintendent of the Library Buildings and Grounds and Deputy Superintendent for the Senate Office Buildings. Prior to joining the Architect of the Capitol in 1997, Mr. Ayers was a General Engineer with Voice of America, leading the organization’s construction efforts at several sites in Greece and Germany. He also served as an officer in the U.S. Air Force. Mr. Ayers is a licensed architect in California, a member of the American Institute of Architects, the National Trust for Historic Preservation, and an Accredited Professional in Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design. He completed his Master’s of Science degree in Systems Management from the University of Southern California and received his Bachelor of Science degree in Architecture at the University of Maryland.

    Eduardo M. Ochoa, Nominee for Assistant Secretary for Postsecondary Education, Department of Education
    Dr. Eduardo M. Ochoa has served as Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs at Sonoma State University since 2003. He is responsible for the University’s academic programs, strategic planning, and overall diversity initiative. He is also involved with the California State University Graduation Initiative. As a member of the CSU Academic Council, Dr. Ochoa contributes to CSU’s academic administration and plays a significant role in system-wide strategic planning and academic technology initiatives. Prior to his position at Sonoma, he served for six years as Dean of the College of Business Administration at California State Polytechnic University-Pomona and for thirteen years as Professor of Economics at California State University-Los Angeles. Dr. Ochoa is a graduate of Reed College (B.A., Physics, Philosophy), Columbia University (M.S., Nuclear Engineering), and the New School for Social Research (Ph.D., Economics).

    Deborah Loewenberg Ball, Nominee for Member, National Board for Education Sciences, Department of Education
    Deborah Loewenberg Ball is currently Dean of the School of Education and William H. Payne Collegiate Professor at the University of Michigan. She conducts research on mathematics instruction and on professional education to improve the quality and effectiveness of teaching. Prior to joining the faculty at the University of Michigan, she was on the faculty at the College of Education at Michigan State University from 1988-1996, and an elementary classroom teacher in East Lansing, Michigan from 1976–1988. Dr. Ball has authored or co-authored over 150 publications and has lectured and made numerous major presentations around the world. Her research has been recognized with several awards and honors, and she has served on several national and international commissions and panels focused on policy initiatives and the improvement of education. She serves on the Board of the Spencer Foundation, is a trustee of the Mathematical Sciences Research Institute in Berkeley, California, and was elected to membership in the National Academy of Education in 2007. Dr. Ball holds a B.A. in French and education from Michigan State University and an M.A. and Ph.D. in education, with specializations in teacher education, education policy, and mathematics education, also from Michigan State University.

    Adam Gamoran, Nominee for Member, National Board for Education Sciences, Department of Education
    Adam Gamoran is the John D. MacArthur Professor of Sociology and Educational Policy Studies and Director of the Wisconsin Center for Education Research at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. He has been on the University faculty since 1984. From 2001-2004, he served as chair of the department of sociology, and from 2008-2009 he served as interim dean of the School of Education. Dr. Gamoran is an elected member of the National Academy of Education and has served on several committees of the National Research Council, including the Board on Science Education. He also chairs the Independent Advisory Panel of the National Assessment of Career and Technical Education for the U.S. Department of Education. Dr. Gamoran received his B.A., M.A., and Ph.D. degrees from the University of Chicago.

    Bridget Terry Long, Nominee for Member, National Board for Education Sciences, Department of Education
    Bridget Terry Long is currently a Professor of Education and Economics at the Harvard University Graduate School of Education. Dr. Long is also a Research Associate of the National Bureau of Economic Research (NBER) and a Research Affiliate of the National Center for Postsecondary Research (NCPR). As an economist specializing in the study of education, Dr. Long examines the transition from high school to higher education and beyond. Her work focuses on college access and choice, factors that influence student outcomes, and the behavior of postsecondary institutions. Dr. Long received the National Academy of Education/Spencer Postdoctoral Fellowship and has been awarded numerous research grants and awards, including the Robert P. Huff Golden Quill Award for excellence in research and published works on student financial assistance. Dr. Long received her Ph.D. and M.A. from the Harvard University Department of Economics and her A.B. from Princeton University.

    Margaret R. (Peggy) McLeod, Nominee for Member, National Board for Education Sciences, Department of Education
    Dr. Margaret R. (Peggy) McLeod is currently Executive Director of Student Services and Special Education in the Alexandria City Public Schools. She has also worked as a consultant to national advocacy and professional organizations, universities, states, and school districts. She served as Assistant Superintendent for Special Education in the D.C. Office of the State Superintendent of Education. In D.C., she has also served as State Title III Director, Director of the Office of Bilingual Education, Title VII Coordinator, Bilingual Program Developer, and ESL teacher. From 2002 – 2003, she served as Deputy Director of the National Organization for Bilingual Education. She worked at the U.S. Department of Education’s Office of Special Education and Rehabilitative Services from 1995 – 2001. In her native Puerto Rico, she taught in two Montessori schools and owned a center that provided after school services to students with disabilities. Dr. McLeod holds a B.A. in Economics from the University of Puerto Rico, an M.A. in Special Education from New York University, and an Ed.D. in Bilingual Special Education Leadership from the George Washington University.

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • President Barack Obama Today Announced the designation of a Presidential Delegation t

    02.23.10 09:13 AM

    The Honorable General James L. Jones, USMC (Ret), National Security Advisor to the President, will lead the delegation.

    MEMBERS OF THE PRESIDENTIAL DELEGATION:

    The Honorable John F. Tefft, U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine

    The Honorable Melanne Verveer, Ambassador-at-Large for Global Women’s Issues, U.S. Department of State

    The Honorable Philip H. Gordon, Assistant Secretary, Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs, U.S. Department of State

    Ms. Kristina A. Kvien, Director for European Economic Affairs and European Union Relations, National Security Council

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • Vice President Biden Hosts Conference Call with Mayors and County Officials to Discus

    02.23.10 11:51 AM

    Earlier today, the Vice President hosted a conference call with Mayors and a county official from across the country to discuss implementation of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act.

    The following officials participated:

    Mayor Ron V. Dellums (D-Oakland, CA)Mayor Bob Foster (D-Long Beach, CA)Mayor Tom Martin (R-Lubbock, TX)Mayor Raul G. Salinas (D-Laredo, TX)County Commissioner David Ferdinand (R-Canyon County, ID)

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • Briefing by White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs, 2/23/10

    02.23.10 01:24 PM

    1:40 P.M. EST

    MR. GIBBS: Two quick announcements before we take your questions here. The President and First Lady will welcome President Sarkozy of France to the White House on Tuesday, March 30th, for a meeting and a private dinner. France is an invaluable partner and ally of the United States in our shared efforts to promote peace, security and prosperity around the world. And the French and the American people share deep cultural and historic ties.

    The President looks forward to consulting with President Sarkozy on a broad range of strategic issues of mutual concern, including Afghanistan and Pakistan, Iran, Middle East peace efforts, European security cooperation, and sustaining global economy recovery.

    Secondly, today the President announced the administration’s strong support for repealing the antitrust exemption currently enjoyed by health insurers. At its core, health reform is all about ensuring that American families and businesses have more choices, benefit from more competition, and have greater control over their own health care. Repealing this exemption is an important part of that effort.

    Today there are no rules outlawing bid rigging, price fixing, and other insurance company practices that will drive up health care costs, and often drive up their own profits as well.
    That was transmitted to Congress in a statement of administration policy as the House considers that legislation over the next couple of days.

    Yes, ma’am.

    Q Robert, a lot of members of your own party on the Hill are wondering how aggressive the President is going to get in selling this latest, last-ditch effort at comprehensive reform. So what are his plans? Is he going to talk to the public? Are we going to hear him talking frequently about the need to do this? What’s the sort of rollout campaign for his plan?

    MR. GIBBS: Well, look, I’m not going to get too far ahead of the next thing that’s on the calendar, and that’s the importance of – important events of Thursday in –-

    Q Democrats are saying that this kind of an effort would be just as important as sitting down around the table. You also have to sell it to a public that’s skeptical and to Democrats on the Hill who are skeptical.

    MR. GIBBS: Well, but I think before we get there the President has wanted to and will sit down with Democrats and Republicans to discuss their ideas, to go through the plans that had been put forward and to find agreement where that’s possible. I think that’s the next step, and I don’t think the President wants to get too far ahead on that process.

    Q But how are they — I don’t see how they have to be separate from one another. Why do you have to separate one out from the other?

    MR. GIBBS: I’m not discussing whether or not they’re separate. The President is not focused on Friday. The President ultimately is focused on Thursday.

    Q But Democrats are saying he needs to be focused on Friday if there’s any chance of this thing succeeding.

    MR. GIBBS: Well, we have been focused on getting health care reform this far. We’re focused on getting it done. And we look forward to what we hope is a robust exchange of ideas on Thursday. The President —

    Q I hate to drag this out even further, but it sounds like what you’re — it sounds like you’re not willing to say that he’s going to make an aggressive sales effort —

    MR. GIBBS: You want to take this in a different direction. The President is focused — the President is focused on Thursday.

    Yes.

    Q Shifting gears a little bit, can you talk about where things stand with the Volcker rule? It’s being watered down by lawmakers. Treasury put out a statement today talking about wanting limits for banks on proprietary trading. The President’s original announcement was an outright ban, and that’s what Chairman Volcker supports. Are you softening your position?

    MR. GIBBS: Absolutely not. The administration remains as committed today to what was outlined that day with Chairman Volcker and members of the economic team. We’re as committed to that now as we were on that day. This was a proposal that was developed by — at the President’s behest with Chairman Volcker, with Secretary Geithner and with Director Summers, and outlined and announced by the President with all three at his side. We have — we’re not walking away from and we’re not watering down that proposal one bit.

    Q But are you signaling that you’d be willing to accept less than what the President initially —

    MR. GIBBS: We’re as committed to what the President outlined that day. We’re as committed to that now as we were on that day. We’re not walking away from what the President outlined on the Volcker rule.

    Q You’ve taken a pretty strong stand on the consumer agency. Do you feel as strongly about the Volcker rule as that?

    MR. GIBBS: Absolutely. Absolutely.

    Q Just one other question. Can you talk about tonight’s dinner with the business leaders? What does the President want to talk to them about? And what is he going to talk about tomorrow? You mentioned the international tax provisions, but what other topics —

    MR. GIBBS: I was asked that yesterday. Look, I think the President will outline a vision for a more competitive America. The President looks forward to sitting down with executive community members from the Business Roundtable this evening and having a free-flowing conversation about their ideas — we’ll have — I think we’ve put out some of those names, we’ll put out the remainder of those names at the beginning of the dinner — to discuss where the interests of workers, business and government intersect in creating a new foundation for ensuring incentives for continued hiring; to talk about the need to export more of our goods overseas and open up markets; to discuss the steps that we’ve taken to stabilize the economy and the financial system; and discuss what his vision is moving forward. So I think that will all be what he outlines tomorrow at the speech.

    Yes, sir.

    Q Can you tell us a little bit more about this statement of administration policy regarding the antitrust exemption? Why specifically now? How long has the President been planning on coming out in favor of this? He’s been hinting about it for quite some time.

    MR. GIBBS: Well, the House is considering in their legislative vehicle — this legislation goes to the Rules Committee today; as my understanding, goes to the floor either tomorrow or the day after that. We typically weigh in at this part — point in the process with a statement of administration policy. It’s been evaluated by a number of departments throughout government, and believe that this — removing this exemption will allow appropriate enforcement and examination of potential policies that might prove uncompetitive, might stifle competition, and we think this better promotes affordability and innovation through greater choice and less market concentration.

    Q I think it was either a few weeks ago or a few months ago the President said, I think in one of the weekly addresses, that it was time for Congress to consider repealing the antitrust exemption. Do you have evidence that there is any, as you put it, bid rigging or price fixing? Is that why he came out more solidly in favor of this?

    MR. GIBBS: We do know this, Jake, that the AMA studied the market concentration of health insurers and found that 94 percent of the U.S. health insurance markets were highly concentrated, meaning one or only a few health insurers offering policies in, as I said, almost all the markets in the country. This allows DOJ and FTC the ability to look into, in complement with state insurance regulations, to ensure competitiveness.

    Q Okay. And about Thursday’s summit, it doesn’t really seem like it’s shaping up right now to seem all that bipartisan on Thursday. You have Republicans saying it’s going to be a Democratic infomercial. The fact that the President posted his plan on whitehouse.gov is indicative of a lack of sincerity on his part, they say, because he’s — and then, for your guy’s part, the bill that you’ve posted is not just a bill the President supports; it’s also a vehicle to get this through Congress without any Republican support.

    MR. GIBBS: Again, Jake, the bill is a starting point for what Congress had spent many months considering. What we get out of Thursday will be, as I said yesterday, based on the willingness of those participating to come in with an open mind and discuss the ideas and the plans that they have.

    Was it disappointing that Senate Republicans appear to have decided not to post their plan on the Internet for discussion, or for Republicans to come with a more consensus plan? Sure, that’s disappointing. I hope that doesn’t wipe away their willingness to actively discuss the ideas that they have to cut costs for those that are drowning — small businesses and families — government budgets, and those that are being discriminated against by the practices of insurance companies.

    Q But doesn’t the fact that you’ve posted it in the form that you’ve posted it, which is not just a list of principles or a statement of legislation –

    MR. GIBBS: Well —

    Q — but, I mean, look, we all know that —

    MR. GIBBS: No, no. In fairness —

    Q — for reconciliation if it comes to that.

    MR. GIBBS: Jake, in fairness, I can assume if we would have simply posted principles they would have said, why isn’t there more information?

    Look, semantics aside, the President looks forward to discussing actively for several hours with members of his administration, Democrats and Republicans, their ideas for health care reform. I think — again, I can’t stress enough, I think the product, the output of six hours of discussion will be based on every participant’s willingness to come and have an honest and frank discussion.

    I don’t think it does any good if somebody says, we’re not going there to offer our ideas, we’re just going there to help people understand how bad the other guys’ ideas are. That’s not what the American people are looking for. They’re looking for Democrats and Republicans who are willing to sit around a table and work together to provide solutions to problems like health care, the rising cost of health care. That’s what the President sees as his hope for what happens on Thursday.

    Q One last thing, I’m sorry. Congressman Jeff Sestak last week said that the White House offered him a high ranking job in the administration to not run against Arlen Specter. Do you guys have any comment on that?

    MR. GIBBS: I was traveling for a couple of days, as you know. I have seen some stuff that he said, but I have not looked into this.

    Jake.

    Q Just to follow on Jake’s question, is the White House optimistic that on Friday health care will be in a different place than it is right now, that something will actually —

    MR. GIBBS: Hopefully Thursday afternoon. Again, I think the President wants to sit down and discuss ways to move forward, ideas of common interest.

    Q — from Republicans are you confident, are you optimistic that this —

    MR. GIBBS: I am, because, look, I think this is — you always have a little bit of pre-game chatter. I think the — again, the willingness of individuals and groups to discuss these ideas I think will change when the — I think the American people want to see that two parties can sit around a table and coherently discuss solutions to the problems that the American people face. I think that’s what the American people want to see as well.

    Q One other question. Yesterday after the jobs bill, the Republicans supporting the jobs bill, did the President directly reach out to them, thank them for —

    MR. GIBBS: I don’t know that the President made any calls. Obviously you saw our statement. Look, I think this is a good example and a good lead-in to Thursday, and that is there’s a willingness for members to put aside partisan games and to move ahead with what we know is important for the American people and for the growth and the stabilization of our economy.

    My sense is that this will pass fairly overwhelmingly either later today or tomorrow. And I think that’s an important step on the road to each party working together on solutions for the American people.

    Chip.

    Q On the health care, supporters of the public option are making another push in preparation for Thursday’s meeting to try to get it back on the agenda. By not including it in the President’s proposal, is the President saying as far as he’s concerned it’s dead?

    MR. GIBBS: Well, look, I think that we have seen obviously — and I talked about this some yesterday — that there are some that are supportive of this. There isn’t enough political support in a majority to get this through. The President wanted to find — took the Senate bill as a base, and looks forward to discussing consensus ideas on Thursday.

    Q A question that I — on Wall Street bonuses. The New York State Comptroller just released its report for 2009. It says pay was up 17 percent over 2008. The average taxable bonus on Wall Street rose to $123,850, and pay was probably even higher than that because it didn’t include deferred compensation or stock options. First of all, any comment from the administration that has at least talked a lot and done some hard work to try to get these bonuses to go down instead of up? And secondly, is the White House satisfied with regulators in Congress and what they’re doing to curb these bonuses?

    MR. GIBBS: Well, Chip, obviously you’ve heard the President on a number of occasions voice his frustration and outright shock at the pay practices of Wall Street at a time in which the American people were rushing directly to their financial aid to prevent a further collapse of the economy.

    The President in the Recovery Act appointed Ken Feinberg to review the bonus and compensation structure of firms that had received extraordinary governmental assistance, and he’s pleased with the efforts that Ken has made thus far. We pushed for in the House a provision providing shareholders with a say on executive pay that did pass the House and is certainly pending in the Senate. And the President has long advocated that in lieu of cash, any bonus that is given ought to be given in long-term stock that does not, again, reward short-term risk taking, but rewards long-term success. We’ve seen some progress on that front. But, Chip, I think it’s safe to say that the President remains frustrated and believes that the compensation practices of Wall Street have a long way to go.

    Q And despite all his efforts it seems that they just kind of shrug off the criticism. I mean, isn’t there something beyond frustration? Isn’t there more he can do here?

    MR. GIBBS: Well, again, look, we have instituted important rules for the firms that directly received extraordinary assistance to keep them afloat. I think the American people are equally outraged and shocked by what appears to be a carelessness about the way the people of this country — a carelessness about the way the people of this country loaned Wall Street money to ensure it didn’t collapse, all while Wall Street appears not to hear the outrage and the frustration each day on the pay practices that we’ve seen thus far.

    Q Robert, the CBO says it doesn’t have enough information on this new health care plan to score it. Are you going to provide that info so it’s scored before tomorrow?

    MR. GIBBS: The plan wasn’t put up in order to score it before tomorrow, no.

    Q I thought you guys wanted the — what is going on? Yesterday —

    MR. GIBBS: Well, we —

    Q — do you still want to have the CBO there?

    MR. GIBBS: There were folks that mentioned that might be uncomfortable for –- congressional leaders that mentioned that might be uncomfortable for CBO based on executive and congressional — I think we’ll have access to OMB. Suffice to say we have a rough sense of —

    Q — said don’t bring the CBO?

    MR. GIBBS: I’m not going to get into that. The proposal that the President put online, again, is a starting point. This wasn’t something that we ever believed would be a proposal that would be fully scored. Our hope is that we can add some ideas for a broader-consensus legislation that could go to CBO.

    Q Do you plan on getting it fully scored? Do you guys plan on asking the Congressional Budget Office to do that?

    MR. GIBBS: Not before Thursday.

    Q No, but after Thursday, what you come up with — because it’s never going to be a full bill, I understand that, because you still have the Senate bill on one hand and the fixes on the other hand.

    MR. GIBBS: I’m not going to get past where we’re going on Thursday.

    Q Yesterday on the job’s bill, you guys had endorsed one bill, then it got yanked and Reid put out this very — this smaller $15 billion bill. Do you expect to see the Senate do a series of these now?

    MR. GIBBS: Well, we said that then. We said that — I mean, for instance, we’ve —

    Q What do you guys want to see the Senate tackle next?

    MR. GIBBS: Well, I think what you’ll see — what I know has to happen by the end of the month, obviously, is an extension of long-term unemployment benefits and an extension of health care and COBRA benefits that many would see expire at the end of the month. Obviously, there are additional tax ideas, and the President outlined a series of small business ideas that he hopes that the Senate will take up.

    Q There’s one in this —

    MR. GIBBS: Look, we said then and it’s certainly true now that legislation making its way through the Senate will — this legislation that they’re now considering will not be the first — oh, I’m sorry, is the first but won’t be the last proposal that the Senate will likely take up.

    Q Do you think this is turning out to be a better way to get through — things through the Senate, these small chunks? Or just —

    MR. GIBBS: Well, I think it is encouraging that you had bipartisan support yesterday for moving these ideas forward for debate. My prediction is that you will have — this is something that despite the threat of — the threat of filibuster and the need to end that threat, my guess is you’ll have pretty broad bipartisan support. What that means is — again, I think there’s — I think the American people want to see us end the game play. I’ll let each individual member decide how they want to respond to a constituent who says, why did you oppose moving forward with it on Monday and support it on Wednesday or Thursday?

    Look, again, I think there are — many of these — there will be several avenues which to take up ideas in the Senate. I think it’s important that we get them done quickly.

    Q Very quick clarification on the Republican health care. Do you guys not — the House Republicans yesterday responded to your comment saying that they didn’t have a health care plan saying, hey, no, we have a health care plan.

    MR. GIBBS: What I was talking about was a consensus — were consensus ideas — was a consensus set of —

    Q So you don’t believe the House Republican plan is the consensus Republican plan?

    MR. GIBBS: Well, I don’t know if — I will assume, in lieu of Mitch McConnell posting a plan, that Mitch McConnell is quite pleased with Congressman Boehner’s plan. I think we’ll assume that the plan that the House Republicans have speaks for the Senate Republicans in lieu of the Senate Republicans themselves posting their ideas.

    Yes, sir.

    Q What do you make of the characterizations of Thursday as "last best hope," "last ditch" on health care reform?

    MR. GIBBS: Look, I think it is — I think this is an important avenue for each party to get together and seek consensus. I think it’s easier to fire away at each other when you’re not in the same room and you’re not having to sit down and talk to each other. So I think this provides an important avenue for us, for members of Congress, and, quite frankly, for the American people to see us work together, and I think that’s what the President hopes to see on Thursday.

    Q Is it the last avenue?

    MR. GIBBS: I hope not.

    Q And what can you tell us about the negotiations — or are there negotiations — on format, on table size, on cameras? Who’s making the calls on this? It almost sounds like a G8 summit negotiation with sherpas or something.

    MR. GIBBS: No, I have — you know, I can’t imagine that we couldn’t find a few tables to put together and somebody can write out some rudimentary name cards and we can all find places to sit. Look, I mean, I — you know —

    Q That’s not the House being —

    MR. GIBBS: Is it being characterized as something far more complex than that?

    Q Oh, yes.

    Q Seems like it.

    MR. GIBBS: How so?

    Q Well, the shape of the table has changed —

    MR. GIBBS: Let me tell you, if the biggest thing that we debate on Thursday is the shape of the table, then I could understand the utter disgust and contempt that the American people might have.

    Q Chalkboard or PowerPoint?

    MR. GIBBS: Look, I think that the American people will see that we can get past discussing — I don’t know who’s discussing the size and the shape of the table. I think that is somewhat immaterial to the solutions that will be discussed. The President is not — the President is interested in having a balanced conversation and hearing from Republicans and Democrats. I don’t know what the shape of the table was in Baltimore. That seemed to be a process that worked quite well for —

    Q I don’t think there was a table.

    MR. GIBBS: There wasn’t a table. Maybe we’ll just — you know, maybe those little desks they give you in like elementary school that would otherwise be uncomfortable and hard to fit into might be the best way forward.

    Q Is there going to be a lunch break? (Laughter.)

    Q Maybe no desks, no chairs?

    Q Recess?

    MR. GIBBS: You know, just sitting on the floor and figuring it all out.

    Q Crisscross, apple sauce?

    Q Robert, can the White House point to any evidence for its optimism that this ball — health care ball is going to get moved by the end of Thursday? And what would that be?

    MR. GIBBS: Well, look, I can’t prejudge what happens on Thursday. I take any member that wants to come and have an honest discussion — you take them at their word that that’s what they want to do. We’ll get a chance to see the motivations behind any participation on Thursday.

    I sent this out Thursday. I think many of you all saw that the Republican ideas that are included in the President’s proposal — the President is open to discussion on issues relating to cost and insurance reforms to how we save money for the federal government as it relates to our deficit, and to improving — to coverage. So those are roughly — to get back to some of the formatting questions, there will be discussions on each of the four of those things as the President — or as the administration outlined in their letter to Congress that I think we’ll spend a good amount of time discussing. And, again, the President is looking forward to hearing from members and having an honest discussion.

    Q Does the President buy into the conventional wisdom that with each passing day, as the midterm elections come around, doing some heavy lifting like this health care legislation becomes harder?

    MR. GIBBS: Look, obviously I think when we get later into the summer that’s probably likely the case. But I think we understand that there’s a number of things that we have on our plate that are going to have to get done before — and what the President wants to see get done before those elections in November, including not just health care but continued effort on jobs and employment, financial reform, and other important things that have to get done between now and November.

    Q So no deadline for congressional — and on the antitrust exemption, does the President think that that can be a stand-alone action that takes care of some of the health insurance problems, or does it have to be a part of the larger package?

    MR. GIBBS: Well, look, I think this certainly complements what — this will ultimately complement health care reform in ensuring the changes that you make in the market — that the ability to look into potential anti-competitive practices, that that’s not, quite frankly, illegal to do. This is not in lieu of something to make broader changes in the insurance market. This is a complementary step along the way.

    Q Finally, as I understand it, the participants are going to have lunch on site on Thursday. Does the President —

    MR. GIBBS: I have no idea what they’re going to eat. (Laughter.)

    Q — planning to join them?

    Q Something healthy. A box lunch? Is it going to be in a bag?

    MR. GIBBS: I think there was some discussion of a box lunch.

    Q Will the President participate?

    MR. GIBBS: I will check on that.

    Q Yes, is he staying the whole time or is he dipping in and dipping out?

    MR. GIBBS: He’ll be there.

    Q The whole time?

    MR. GIBBS: Yes.

    Q Okay.

    Q Robert, I’d like to give you a chance to respond to a couple things that House Republicans said today. First, Eric Cantor, quoting him directly, "They say the definition of insanity is continuing to do the same thing and expect a different result. And the President clearly seems to be trying to prove that that is true." That’s Eric Cantor. John Boehner, regarding the President: "He has basically crippled the summit that’s expected on Thursday by coming in with a rerun of the same failed bill that couldn’t pass the House or the Senate." Could you respond to those two —

    MR. GIBBS: Well, the bill passed — one bill actually did pass the House and one bill actually did pass the Senate. This is a — in many ways a consensus plan around those ideas. Look, again, as I likened a minute ago, you can put your — tape your quotes up on the locker room wall and put on your —

    Q It’s locker room material?

    MR. GIBBS: I think it is. I think it’s — you hit my shoulder pads, I’ll hit yours, and we’ll go running off through the tunnel.

    Q But that’s on the same team, though, Robert.

    MR. GIBBS: I know. They’re all going to —

    Q Among themselves?

    MR. GIBBS: Yes, that’s the —

    Q Oh, I see.

    MR. GIBBS: I lost you on the football analogy, didn’t I? (Laughter.) It was very clear up here, Major, it just apparently didn’t get —

    Q He’s mourning LT. (Laughter.)

    MR. GIBBS: So I read. But, again, look, we can play games about the President’s proposal —

    Q So they’re just trying to hype themselves up in anticipation?

    MR. GIBBS: Look, I think — if the President hadn’t put anything on there, wouldn’t you guess, Major, that we would hear, well, is the President not bringing any ideas to the summit? I mean, are we not going to — do we not have a document with which we’re working on to start this proposal? Of course you would have.

    Q Are you saying that no matter what you did, Republicans will criticize?

    MR. GIBBS: I mean, it is hard to say — I will say this, it is hard to take into — it is hard to listen to, on one hand, “I can’t believe they’re prejudging the outcome of this by laying out a plan,” and then in the next breath saying, “the plan doesn’t have enough detail to be scored by the CBO.” How do you rationalize — I don’t know how they rationalize it. It’s probably taped up somewhere in the locker room.

    Q It’s irrational.

    MR. GIBBS: It appears to be.

    Q When the President came here about a week and a half ago, he said that what shouldn’t happen is this shouldn’t all go back to the congressional committees for rewrites, the health care legislation. So what I’m curious about is, let’s just say for the sake of argument something miraculous happens Thursday and you get something that’s akin to a deal. Who writes it? I mean, does it go back to committee? Do you go straight to the House floor, the Senate floor? I mean, these kinds of things are not insignificant to achieving a health care result.

    MR. GIBBS: No, they’re not insignificant, but I’ll be honest with you, Major, leaving the table and the lunch structure aside, I think if we come out of there with an agreement on some ideas —

    Q Which you would probably concede would be near miraculous.

    MR. GIBBS: Not necessarily. Again, I don’t want to prejudge the outcome based on people’s willingness to come in there with an open mind. But I don’t think the largest impediment to getting something done is, is does the Legislative Counsel for the Ways and Means Committee write down our final ideas or do we send it to larger — I think those are — well, again, once we get past the size of the table, I think we can come to — I think we can come to an agreement and an understanding of that. I think what we lack right now appears to be, based on some of the quotes that you just read me, is a willingness to come and discuss these issues.

    Q Let me give you a chance to answer a question on the minds of some progressives. If you are open to the idea of reconciliation, why not put public option in it and go all the way?

    MR. GIBBS: Well, again, the President simply believes that we ought to have an up or down vote on health care. Again, I’m not going to get into the structure of how things would look. The President is focused on what he hopes will be a productive conversation on Thursday.

    Q I want to follow up on Jake’s question, because on Friday, unnamed officials of this building did vociferously deny Representative Sestak’s assessment that he had been offered a job. And I just want to say, when you said, “I haven’t looked at this,” I want to make sure you’re not contradicting that denial.

    MR. GIBBS: I just — because I was on the road and dealing with different things on the road, I’ve not had a chance to delve into this.

    Q Would there be anything inappropriate about a discussion like that?

    MR. GIBBS: Let me have somebody look into — like I said, I was on the road and I don’t really have a whole lot of knowledge on this.

    Yes.

    Q Can I ask on the — not to prolong the table/boxed lunch questions, but the President will be out on national television for hours and hours and hours. Usually, when a President goes out that long, there is some sort of preparation for that. Is there any kind of rehearsal or discussion or briefing or any kind of practice?

    MR. GIBBS: Well, look, he and Nancy-Ann have gone through ideas and proposals. He’s gotten a longer memo on what ideas are out there and — in hopes of, again, finding some common agreement on this.

    Q But would you do any kind of mock session in which somebody would say, "Sir, somebody might ask you — what would you respond?”

    MR. GIBBS: I’m not going to say that. (Laughter.) I don’t know of any structure like that.

    Q Whatever it was, please say it.

    MR. GIBBS: Yes. (Laughter.)

    Yes, ma’am.

    Q I have a question just to —

    Q Wait, I’m sorry, I’m sorry —

    Q Oh, sorry, go ahead.

    Q One last one, sorry. On the President’s exemption part, a lot of Democrats would like that to be in the bill you posted yesterday, and yet it’s not. Why support it separately and not as part of it?

    MR. GIBBS: Well, again, this was going through a House process. We had certainly known for I don’t know how long, but we’ve known that this was going to Rules Committee today. Typically the administration weighs in with a statement on administration policy at this point.

    Q — propose it yesterday?

    MR. GIBBS: Yes, I mean, I think it’s — I think there’s a belief that we can get a bipartisan majority that can support ensuring that type of competition without putting it into legislation.

    Mara.

    Q Robert, just to follow up on Jennifer’s question, when you first got your plan the leadership in Congress was fairly non-committal. They said they wanted to take a look at it and discuss it with their members. Now it’s been more than 48 hours. What in the —

    MR. GIBBS: Well, not 48.

    Q I’m sorry, 24.

    MR. GIBBS: Right.

    Q What indication do you have that at least in the House of Representatives there is support for — majority support for this?

    MR. GIBBS: Look, I don’t want to get ahead of announcing for them where all of their members are. I know they’re — as I understand it, they’re going to have a caucus today to discuss some of these ideas, and they also met last night, and —

    Q You haven’t gotten any feedback in the —

    MR. GIBBS: Look, I got to tell you, I thought the statements yesterday by a number of members were indeed quite positive.

    Q Do you think this could pass the House of Representatives?

    MR. GIBBS: I’m not a vote counter on Capitol Hill, but I do believe that this represents among Democratic ideas a good starting point based on where the Senate was, with some tweaks in that legislation. Again, this is a starting point for our discussions on Thursday that we hope will be fruitful.

    Q But doesn’t it go to Congress after that? I mean, don’t you want them to do something with it, even if there’s not some kind of bipartisan miracle? I mean, you’re —

    MR. GIBBS: Again, I know it’s only Tuesday and I’m focused on Thursday and we want to look beyond Thursday. I’m focused on Thursday; I know that’s where the President is focused on. Our intention is to have an honest discussion and hopefully find continued support for ideas on both sides of the aisle.

    Q I’m just talking about your side of the aisle.

    MR. GIBBS: I understand. I know there’s — again, there’s a willingness to want to get well ahead of the process. The President is focused on Thursday. As I said earlier, the bill wasn’t sent to CBO to get scored because our hope is that we’re going to add ideas from both sides of the aisle that have common support. I think there are overlaps if people come with a willingness to make progress on an issue.

    Q Let me try another way. (Laughter.) Have you had conversations with Democrats since you put this thing online?

    MR. GIBBS: Yes, we’ve briefed Congress.

    Q What’s been the response?

    MR. GIBBS: Again, I don’t — Mara, you guys are normally quite good at getting quotes from them. I’ve seen many positive quotes on this. Again, our focus is not on what happens Friday, next week, two weeks from now or what have you. Our focus is on a starting point —

    Q It has to be, Robert —

    MR. GIBBS: But it’s not.

    Q The White House does not sit still and wait for Friday to come before —

    MR. GIBBS: We’re focused on Thursday. We’re focused on —

    Q But that doesn’t make any sense. Don’t you want to pass a bill?

    MR. GIBBS: And that’s why we’re doing this on Thursday.

    Q I mean, if this is an urgent need for the American public to address all sorts of things — economic, regulatory and everything else, all the things you have said a hundred times if not more from this podium — how could you not be thinking past Thursday?

    MR. GIBBS: Major, I’m not going to prejudge the outcome of Thursday by telling you what’s going to happen Friday based on an outcome of Thursday that I don’t know about, based on the fact that I think the willingness — or the product that ultimately comes out of 4:00 o’clock on Thursday will be based on people’s willingness to come with an open mindset. That’s what the President —

    Q — not to say you don’t have contingency plans?

    MR. GIBBS: I’m focused on Thursday; the White House is focused on Thursday; the President is focused on Thursday. As luck would have it, you all probably have a chance to ask me questions on Friday, and we can get to Friday.

    Q But Leg Affairs might be focused on a different day.

    Q Is there a plan A, plan B, plan C, possibly?

    MR. GIBBS: We’re focused on Thursday.

    Q Is there a plan A, plan B, plan C, possibly?

    Q What if nothing comes out of Thursday that —

    MR. GIBBS: Then you could ask me that on Friday.

    Q All evidence out there points to them showing up and not wanting to make this deal. But is it not naïve to think that — if your overall goal —

    MR. GIBBS: No.

    Q — but it just seems naïve to think —

    MR. GIBBS: Can I just say this? I don’t know — I get one question that says, I can’t believe by putting out a plan you’ve completely prejudged and corrupted and polluted the process of what’s going to happen on Thursday. So if I then start describing what’s going to happen on Friday, based on what may happen on Thursday, aren’t you going to certainly — aren’t certainly people going to come back and say you’ve already prejudged the outcome of Thursday by discussing what’s going to happen on Friday?

    Q Robert, we’re not asking you about Friday. We’re asking you if you feel confident that you will have Democratic support for this plan today or tomorrow?

    MR. GIBBS: We have discussed this plan with Democrats. I know that they’re evaluating parts of the legislation.

    Q But you said — there was a bill that passed the House and a bill that passed the Senate, but if I understood your answer to Mara correctly —

    MR. GIBBS: No, I said that — apparently I said that to Congressman Boehner, who didn’t think that happened.

    Q But if I understand your answer to Mara, you can’t say now if this proposal of the President could even pass the House, which is the first step to getting a bill —

    MR. GIBBS: No, I said I wasn’t a vote counter and I don’t have —

    Q Do you have some confidence it could pass the House?

    MR. GIBBS: I have confidence that, based on the quotes that I’ve seen, this has been received warmly by Democrats on Capitol Hill.

    Q — 39 Democrats who voted no for the House health care bill back in November indicated that they’d vote yes the next go-round?

    MR. GIBBS: I don’t know the answer to that question. One of you ask a question.

    Q Okay. I’ll go first. This is health care-related, but going back to August, just clarifying some Sunday talk show chatter —

    MR. GIBBS: I guess — yes. I don’t know what the resistance is to talking about now. (Laughter.)

    Go ahead.

    Q You said that the — "the President’s clear commitment is not to raise taxes on those making less than $250,000 a year.” The President’s proposal out yesterday actually would raise the Medicare payroll or hospital insurance tax on households making less than $250,000. Wouldn’t that —

    MR. GIBBS: I’d have to look through the proposal. I’m not sure that’s correct.

    Q Thank you, Robert. Excuse me. This morning Governor Daniels of Indiana was asked about reconciliation which comes up with regulatory here, and he said that when the tax cuts were passed in the previous administration, where he served as OMB director, it was meant to be applied only to taxes and budget matters, but never to matters such as revolutionary changes in policy that would affect 16 percent of the government — or 16 percent of the economy.

    MR. GIBBS: How much does — $1.35 trillion worth of tax cuts in 2001, $350 billion in tax cuts in 2003 — for $1.65 trillion in tax cuts over two votes, is what measure of — that’s a price tag that exceeds what the President is talking about. And differently than that, the proposal that the President has is indeed paid for.

    Q But —

    MR. GIBBS: I knew there was a "but" in there. I just had to get my broader —

    Q Right. It did deal with tax and budget matters, which under —

    MR. GIBBS: Again, there —

    Q — which was with reconciliation —

    MR. GIBBS: Welfare was another example of something that had passed based on reconciliation. I can certainly get a list of, I think many of you can get a list of, ideas that have gone through the process of that that up until recently didn’t seem to be abnormal.

    Q After you gave 13 questions to one reporter, I just have —

    MR. GIBBS: Who asked 13 questions?

    Q — one two-parter.

    MR. GIBBS: One two-parter. (Laughter.) I like your new packaging, Lester. Who asked 13 questions, though?

    Q FOX. (Laughter.)

    MR. GIBBS: Wow, that’s awkward, isn’t it?

    Q — even ask your question. (Laughter.)

    MR. GIBBS: All right, all right, easy. This locker room talk is getting a little out of hand, isn’t it?

    Q You started it.

    MR. GIBBS: I know, I did. I’ll come over there, Connie.

    Q The nonpartisan, nonprofit Judicial Watch has named Nevada’s Republican Senator John Ensign as one of Washington’s 10 most corrupt politicians for 2009. Does the White House agree with that?

    MR. GIBBS: I have not seen Judicial Watch’s list.

    Q They also named the President as one of these. I presume you don’t agree with that.

    MR. GIBBS: I have no basis for which they would come up with something like that. I have not seen their 2009 report.

    April, and then Connie.

    Q Robert, one on the public option. You say that it’s not in this, but are there any components of the public option that will be taken and transplanted into this proposal that the President has for Thursday?

    MR. GIBBS: Again, this is a debate that was largely ended with the notion that it’s not going to make it through the legislative process. The proposal that the President put online was where he believed was a good starting point at the end of the debate that had been had on Capitol Hill. We think that the way exchanges are structured and other components of the legislation will increase the amount of choice and competition that people have in picking health insurance.

    Q Also on another question, Democrats concerned about the fact that this administration — they are just not listening to what constituents have to say, and also amongst ranks. You have people like Ed Rendell, governor of Pennsylvania, you also have Doug Wilder, former governor of Virginia, former mayor of Richmond. What are your thoughts about the issues of listening, about the fact that people are saying, in your own party, that this administration is just not listening?

    MR. GIBBS: In what way?

    Q On strategic — on strategic avenues to include how to campaign for the upcoming election, midterms, as well as just the top echelon here, some of the reasons why things — including Massachusetts — were lost; this administration is just not listening to people on the ground, to fellow Democrats about what to do next.

    MR. GIBBS: Again, I’m sure people’s advice on the November elections — there will certainly be plenty of time to listen to anybody’s advice on the November elections, since we’re only comfortably in mid-February.

    The President’s focus isn’t on the elections in November; it’s on getting this economy started again, on passing comprehensive health care reform, on prosecuting a war in Iraq and a war in Afghanistan.

    Q Do you think this administration has a good track record on listening to its own party?

    MR. GIBBS: Absolutely. But I also know that the President has a good track record on making decisions that he believes are in the best interest of the country. Again, I think if you look back at some of the decisions that were made in terms of continuing support for helping banks that might collapse, or helping auto companies that were near bankruptcy, I don’t imagine that there were majorities of Democrats or Republicans that might have thought that was a good idea or something that they readily supported. But understanding that without taking some extraordinary steps to deal with that, we would have had tens of thousands of more people unemployed in the case of auto companies; we’d have — we wouldn’t have a domestic auto industry except for one company; and it’s likely that had we seen additional bank failures, we would have seen what many have called a Great Recession become a Great Depression.

    Governing a country isn’t always about making the easiest, most popular decisions. Governor Rendell talked about the selling of the stimulus. The stimulus plan was about ensuring that we got the type of support that the economy needed into the economy as quickly as possible.

    I don’t have any doubt that the polling on the stimulus might be different if instead of doing it in three weeks and getting the money quickly into the economy so that we could see people put back to work and see economic growth happen faster — I have no doubt that we could have taken eight months, fueled up Air Force One, flown hither and yon and broken out each component part to where it was 80 percent and ultimately gotten Congress to pass that. The problem with that is I don’t think the President believed that when we were losing close to 800,000 jobs in a month, that his biggest job was PR. I think it was getting the economy moving again.

    We’ve seen as a result of that increased economic growth for the first time in a year, and now we’ve seen it for two consecutive quarters. We can’t have job growth before we have economic growth. So we’ve laid a foundation, particularly in the investments that have been made, for creating the jobs of the future.

    Q But PR is part of it, don’t you think? Especially serving your own party.

    MR. GIBBS: I don’t — trust me, as somebody who’s somebody who’s somewhat intimately involved in the PR part of the operation, it’s not the first and foremost thing that gets this President up in the morning. What gets him up is taking the steps that are necessary to fix this economy.

    Obviously explaining to the American people what we’re doing is important and I don’t want to give that short shrift. But at the same time, if it’s explaining to the American people what’s — explaining to them what’s going on, as I said, is important, but so, too, in the case of getting this economy stabilized and moving again, it was important to get that done and get that done quickly.

    Q On Iran —

    MR. GIBBS: Connie. I’ll take one more.

    Q It’s becoming more precarious every day with Iran. Does the United States have a deadline for the sanctions proposed? And would the U.S. impose a unilateral boycott or embargo of Iran?

    MR. GIBBS: Well, the Treasury Department outlined additional sanctions on the IRGC a few weeks ago. It is clear that the continuing announcements and pronouncements that are made in Iran demonstrate that they have no interest in building international confidence that their nuclear program is for peaceful means.

    Continuing to take those steps and shirk their responsibilities, the President and our allies have said will lead to consequences. That is a process that’s ongoing. I think you’ve seen comments by — you’ve certainly seen comments by us, you’ve seen comments by the Russians and others about the fact that time and patience is running out.

    Thanks, guys.

    END
    2:30 P.M. EST

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • President Obama Calls for New Steps to Prepare America’s Children for Success in Coll

    02.22.10 08:04 AM

    Obama Administration Applauds Governors for Bipartisan Work to Develop Higher Standards in Education

    WASHINGTON, DC – Today at a meeting with our nation’s governors, President Obama outlined new steps to better prepare America’s children for college and the workplace. The President is calling for a redesigned Elementary and Secondary Education Act that includes a comprehensive, new vision to help states successfully transition to and implement college- and career-ready standards by improving teacher preparation and development, upgrading classroom instruction, and supporting high-quality assessments.

    “America’s prosperity has always rested on how well we educate our children – but never more so than today,” said President Barack Obama. “This is true for our workers, when a college graduate earns over 60 percent more in a lifetime than a high school graduate. This is true for our businesses, when according to one study; six in ten say they simply can’t find qualified people to fill open positions.”

    Last year, the President challenged states to develop standards and assessments that will help America’s children rise to the challenge of graduating from high school prepared for college and the workplace.

    Today, the Obama Administration announced new efforts to promote college- and career-ready standards in the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. The President and Secretary Duncan applauded Governors for their efforts to work together in a state-led consortium – managed by the National Governors Association (NGA) and the Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) – to develop and implement common reading and math standards that build toward college- and career-readiness.

    “With many states well positioned to adopt these common standards that better position our students for college and careers, the Governors initiative is an essential first step in improving the rigor of teaching and learning in America’s classrooms,” said Secretary of Education Arne Duncan.

    To better align the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) to support college- and career-ready standards, the Obama Administration will integrate new policies into a re-designed ESEA, which will:

    Require all states to adopt and certify that they have college- and career-ready standards in reading and mathematics, which may include common standards developed by a state-led consortium, as a condition of qualifying for Title I funding.Include new funding priorities for states with college- and career-ready standards in place, as they compete for federal funds to improve teaching and learning and upgrade curriculum in reading and math. This priority applies to the President’s FY2011 budget request for new Effective Teaching and Learning programs in literacy ($450 million) and STEM ($300 million).Encourage states, schools districts, and other institutions to better align teacher preparation practices and programs to teaching of college and career-ready standards. This priority supports the President’s FY2011 budget request for a new Teacher and Leaders Pathways program ($405 million).Assist states in implementing assessments aligned with college- and career-ready standards, under a new Assessing Achievement program. The President’s FY2011 budget supports $400 million in state grants under this program.Support the expansion of the Race to the Top, beyond funding in the Recovery Act, to dedicate $1.35 billion in awards to states and school districts that have college- and career-ready standards in place as a condition of funding.Support professional development for teachers, leaders and other school instructional staff to better align instruction to college and career-ready standards. This supports the President’s FY2011 budget request for the Effective Teacher and Leaders state grant program ($2.5 billion).A fact sheet is available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/defa…_factsheet.pdf

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • Toast Remarks by the President and Governor Douglas at the 2010 Governors’ Ball

    02.22.10 07:08 AM

    February 21, 2010

    THE PRESIDENT: Thank you, everybody. Thank you. Please, everybody have a seat. Have a seat.

    Good evening, and welcome back to the White House. For some of you this is the first time; welcome. I want to begin by acknowledging your outstanding chairs of this extraordinary organization — Jim Douglas of Vermont and Joe Manchin of West Virginia. Thank you so much for the great work that you guys do each and every day.

    I also want to let everybody know that this is not too stiff of an affair — (laughter) — because last year Ed Rendell led a conga line. (Laughter.) We still have photographs of some of you that we may use at any point. (Laughter.)

    But it’s interesting to think about where we were last year. Last year we were in the midst of what was the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression. Each of you in your own respective states I think saw how brutal it was on so many families — hundreds of thousands of people losing their jobs every month; home foreclosures; small businesses having to shut down, unable to make payroll; and people not sure about the future and unclear about whether or not we were going to be able to pull ourselves out.

    And I think that it is worth — it is worth reminding ourselves of how urgent the situation was and it’s worth this organization taking some extraordinary credit for helping to right the ship, working, I know, with my Vice President, Joe Biden, who’s done outstanding work. (Applause.) We took some swift and decisive action, and because of that swift and decisive action, not only were folks in your states able to get unemployment insurance and get COBRA at a much cheaper rate, not only were you able to fill some of those budget holes that I know are still tough and I suspect we’ll be talking about tomorrow, but we also started to begin entire new industries and start moving towards a extraordinary future through some of the infrastructure projects and research and development, clean energy projects that are — so many of you have been leaders of.

    If you think about it — I was in Newton, Iowa, seeing a plant that had been closed, now reopened building wind turbines. In Michigan — I was just talking to Governor Granholm about the fact that last year we accounted for 2 percent of the advanced battery technology in the entire world, and by 2015, we are going to account for 40 percent. By the end of this year, we’re going to account for 20 percent of that advanced battery technology. (Applause.)

    The truth is, the reason it worked is because of some very tough choices that many of you made, but the ability to work across state lines and party lines to try to get people focused not just on the past but also on the future. And one of the things that I’ve always said about governors that Washington could learn from is that it’s hard to be overly ideological as a governor, because the fact of the matter is, the rubber hits the road with you. You guys can have all kinds of abstract thoughts, but when families come to you looking for help, when communities have been devastated, you’re the ones they turn to. And so these arguments become a lot less abstract. And I think it’s a reflection of that experience as chief executives in each of your state that makes you able to work together so effectively in this organization.

    So I want to congratulate you for having worked through a very difficult year. I want you to know that this White House wants to continue to partner with you, and not just — not just in terms of us telling you what we think we can do to help, but more importantly, us listening and finding out from you the kinds of extraordinary ideas that all these states represent. You guys are — continue to be the laboratory for our democracy.

    And so we welcome your ideas. We welcome your input. The main thing tonight, though, is we expect you to have a good time. (Laughter.) So, with that, what I’d like to do is to offer a toast. I’d like to offer this toast not only to our constituents, who put up with us and have gone through some extraordinarily difficult times, but I also want to offer a toast to our spouses and families who make extraordinary sacrifices. Some of them oftentimes don’t always — Michelle, she’s starting to clank already. (Laughter.) But our families, our children, all those people who are so supportive of these extraordinary efforts that we’re making.

    So, cheers, everybody. Dinner is served.

    Oh, wait, wait, wait. (Laughter.) This is not the waiter, although he can read the menu. Jim Douglas has been an extraordinary partner with this White House — always constructive, always thoughtful, and we are so pleased to have him here tonight. And so he’s going to offer his own toast.

    Please. (Applause.)

    GOVERNOR DOUGLAS: Mr. President, I thought you might explain that I’m not the entertainment, either, and I appreciate that. (Laughter.)

    Mr. President, on behalf of all my colleagues and the spouses and guests of the governors who are here tonight, I want to thank you for your hospitality.

    As you may know, yesterday the First Lady addressed the National Governors Association. We appreciated her message. And she gave us a little hint and said that you were working on your dance moves up at Camp David. (Laughter.) Now, I don’t know if any of the governors have been preparing, but based on the photographic evidence to which you referred, I hope they have. (Laughter.)

    Well, this is a challenging time for all of us to serve as chief executives at the federal or state level — I’d say an economy that’s still undergoing a great deal of stress, as you noted. Many of our friends and neighbors are struggling to get by. It’s so essential that we all work together in the public interest to bring our states and the American people back to a position of prosperity so that we can move our country into a prosperous future.

    This is also a time when we are sending young men and women abroad to serve in uniform. And as Commanders-in-Chief of our National Guards, we share your commitment, Mr. President, to their well-being. We appreciate your leadership and your support and care of our men and women in uniform.

    The framers of our country designed a federal system of certain responsibilities for the federal government and others reserved to the states. And it’s our responsibility as their successors to maintain that delicate and creative fabric of governance; to continue to act in the best interest of the people whom we serve.

    So, Mr. President, on behalf of the governors of America and others here tonight, I want to offer a toast to you, to the First Lady, and to the people of this great country.

    (A toast is offered.)

    END

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • Statement from the President on Credit Card Bill Implementation

    02.22.10 07:28 AM

    Today, the major reforms of the Credit Card Accountability, Responsibility and Disclosure Act that I signed into law last spring take effect, marking a significant turning point for American consumers. For too long, credit card companies have had free rein to employ deceptive, unfair tactics that hit responsible consumers with unreasonable costs. But today, we are shifting the balance of power back to the consumer and we are holding the credit card companies accountable.

    The new rules taking effect today mean that credit card companies can no longer retroactively increase rates or increase rates in the first year you open an account, charge misleading late fees or use over-limit fee traps. They’re now required to send ample notification if they plan to make changes to the terms of your card and they must employ clear, simple standard payment dates and times. There are new protections for underage consumers, restrictions on double billing and caps on high-fee cards. The new rules are an unprecedented step in my administration’s ongoing efforts to strengthen consumer protections and enact meaningful financial reform.

    These new rules don’t absolve consumers of their obligation to pay their bills, but they finally level the playing field so that every family and small business using a credit card has the information they need to make responsible financial decisions.

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • Statement by the President on the Passing of Alexander Haig

    02.20.10 08:16 AM

    Today we mourn the loss of Alexander Haig, a great American who served our country with distinction. General Haig exemplified our finest warrior-diplomat tradition of those who dedicate their lives to public service. He enjoyed a remarkable and decorated career, rising to become a four-star general and serving as Supreme Allied Commander of Europe before also serving as Secretary of State. Our thoughts and prayers are with his family.

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • Remarks by The First Lady to the National Governors Association

    02.20.10 10:51 AM

    JW Marriott
    Washington, D.C.

    11:09 A.M. EST

    MRS. OBAMA: Thank you all so much. Thank you. It is a pleasure for me to be here with all of you today and to welcome you all to Washington.

    Thank you, Governor Douglas, for that very kind introduction. And thanks to you and Governor Manchin for your leadership in Vermont as well as [West] Virginia, and as the Chair and the Vice Chair of the NGA.

    And I also want to recognize all the governors who are here today and to thank you for your outstanding leadership and the dedicated service that you provide to states all across this country. We are grateful to you.

    Now, I would be remiss if I didn’t thank all the spouses who are here for all the things you have to put up with. (Laughter.) The long hours, absolutely. (Applause.) You all are making the same kind of sacrifices, putting up with long hours and late-night crises. And all I can say is, been there, done that. (Laughter.) And I know how you feel, and we are just grateful to have you all. And again, we’ll give them another round of applause. (Applause.)

    Now, I know that the focus of this year’s meeting is the issue of health care. And over the next few days, you’re going to be talking about spiraling costs that are straining your budgets and running up all of our deficits — costs like the nearly $150 billion a year that we spend on obesity-related conditions like diabetes, heart disease, and high blood pressure. You’re going to talk about the staggering Medicaid burdens — and how premiums have risen three times faster than wages, often bankrupting families in your states, sinking businesses in states all across this country.

    But we all know that there’s another set of statistics that have to be a part of this discussion — like how nearly one in three of our children in this country is now overweight or obese. Like how one in three kids today will eventually develop diabetes — and in the African American and Hispanic communities, the number is nearly half. Because if we think our health care costs are high now, just wait until 10 years from now. Think about the many billions we’re going to be spending then. Think about how high those premiums are going to be when our kids are old enough to have families of their own and businesses of their own.

    So we all know that we can’t solve our health care problems unless we address our childhood obesity problem, too. And that’s really why I’m here today: to talk about the issue of childhood obesity that is so important to me and what our states and our nations can do to solve it.

    But we have to begin by understanding how we got here, what’s caused this crisis in the first place. And I have my theories, but when you all think about it, this is a relatively new phenomenon. This wasn’t something that we were dealing with when I was growing up. Back when we were all growing up, most of us led lives that naturally kept us at a healthy weight. We walked to school and we walked home, because we usually lived in communities where our schools were close. All of us ran around all day at school, doing recess and gym because everybody had to do it. And then when we got home, we’d be sent right back outside and told not to come back home until dinner was served. (Laughter.) You know your parents didn’t let you in the house.

    And back then we ate sensibly. We had many more home-cooked meals. That was the norm. And much to our dismay at the time, there was always something green on the plate. (Laughter.) Fast food and dessert was a special treat. You had it but you didn’t have it every day, and the portion sizes were reasonable. In my family I remember a couple of pints of ice cream — this was a big treat — we’d get three pints of ice cream for a family of four and that would last us a week, because you wouldn’t eat a pint, you’d get a scoop, and that would be it. You’d savor that a spoonful at a time.

    And these weren’t arbitrary rules that our parents just made up. As we know now, it was a way of life they imposed to help keep us active and healthy. They knew back then that kids couldn’t and shouldn’t sit still for hours. They knew that kids needed to run around and play. They knew that keeping us healthy wasn’t about saying no to everything, but it was about balance and moderation. We all had our share of burgers and fries and ice cream growing up. We just didn’t have it every day, and not at every meal.

    But somewhere along the line, we kind of lost that sense of perspective and moderation. And we all want the very best for our kids just like our parents wanted for us. But with the pressures of today’s economy, and the breakneck pace of modern life, many parents feel like the deck is stacked against them.

    They want to prepare healthy foods for their kids, but a lot of times they’re tight on money and they just can’t afford these meals. Or oftentimes they’re tight on time because they’re juggling longer hours at work and many of them juggling multiple jobs. So they just can’t swing coming home and making a home-cooked meal around the dinner table. It’s hard.

    They want their kids to be active, but sometimes they live in communities where either it’s not practical to walk to school or, worse yet, it’s not safe. Or they live in communities where gym classes and school sports are considered luxuries and not necessities — the first things to go in a budget crunch. And those afternoons playing outside, they’ve been replaced by afternoons sitting inside in front of the TV or video games or the Internet. And as a result, many parents feel like they’ve lost that sense of being in charge that their parents had.

    But we have to be honest with ourselves: Our kids didn’t do this to themselves. Our kids didn’t decide whether there’s time for recess or gym class, or our kids don’t decide what’s served to them in the school cafeteria. Our kids don’t decide whether to build playgrounds and parks in their neighborhoods or whether to bring supermarkets and farmer’s markets to their communities. We set those priorities. We make those decisions. And even if it doesn’t feel like we’re in charge, we are.

    But that’s the good news. Because if we make these decisions here, then we can decide to solve this problem. And that’s precisely what so many of you are doing right now in your states. You’re experimenting and innovating. Many of you are ignoring the naysayers and the old partisan divides, and focusing solely on what works.

    In Pennsylvania, for example, folks started a Fresh Food Financing Initiative to bring grocery stores to underserved areas. And I got to visit one of those communities yesterday when I spent some time with Governor Rendell in Philadelphia. In that community they started with $30 million, and then they leveraged that for an additional $190 million from the private and non-profit sectors. And with that money they’ve funded 83 supermarket projects in 34 counties that are making profits, and they’re projected to create more than 5,000 jobs.

    In North Carolina, they’ve launched a full-scale effort to help kids eat healthier and to exercise more. They’ve banned snack and soda vending machines from elementary schools. They’ve given grants to cities and to counties for things like sidewalks and trails and community gardens. And they’ve trained 41,000 teachers across the state on how to incorporate physical activity into the classroom.

    And Arkansas started on the issue of childhood obesity way back in 2003 — something former Governor Huckabee and I discussed yesterday when I appeared on his TV show. They screened students’ BMIs, which was controversial. They got healthier food into their schools and required regular physical education classes. And as a result, that state was able to halt the rise of childhood obesity completely.

    What you all are doing is proof that if we are creative and committed enough, if we meet this challenge with the kind of energy and determination that it requires, then we can take back control and we can turn back the tide and we can give our kids the kind of lives they deserve.

    And that’s why last week we launched this wonderful initiative called "Let’s Move." It’s a nationwide campaign to rally this country around a single ambitious goal, and that is to solve the problem of childhood obesity in a generation so that the kids born today will reach adulthood at a healthy weight.

    So we’ve issued a call to action. We’ve said, let’s move. Let’s move to help families and communities make healthier decisions for their kids. And let’s move to bring together governors and mayors and doctors, nurses, our business leaders, non-profit community, our educators, our athletes, our parents to tackle this challenge once and for all. Because it’s going to take every last one of us — particularly folks in the private sector, from the food industry offering healthier options to retailers who understand that what’s good for kids and families can actually be good for businesses, too.

    That’s why, over the next 90 days, the first ever government-wide task force, which includes members of our Cabinet, will develop a national action plan. And they won’t just review every government program relating to child nutrition and physical activity and advise us on how to marshal those resources. But they’re also going to develop benchmarks to measure our progress, and recommend actions that can be taken by the private and the non-profit sectors.

    But we cannot wait 90 days to get to work here. So we’ve already gotten started on a series of initiatives to achieve our goal.

    There are four key pillars. The first: Let’s move to offer parents the tools and information they need and that many have been asking for to make healthier choices for their kids. So many parents want to do the right thing, but they are bombarded by conflicting information, and they don’t know what to believe or where to start. That’s why many of you have been running public education campaigns and creating healthy-living Web sites. And California is leading the way, becoming the first state in the country to require restaurant chains of a certain size to post calorie information on menus and menu boards — just one part of an aggressive, anti-obesity strategy that’s making a difference across that state. And the health care legislation in Congress follows their lead. It includes a similar provision to help parents make informed decisions.

    Let’s Move is going to add to these efforts. We’ve started with a Web site, called letsmove.gov, that’s going to have helpful tips and step-by-step strategies for parents. We’re also working with pediatricians and family doctors to encourage them to screen kids for obesity early, and then actually write out a prescription for parents with action steps that they can take to address it so they don’t feel like they’re dealing with this problem alone.

    And we’ve been working with the FDA and the food industry to make our food labels more customer-friendly, so that people don’t spend hours squinting at words they can’t pronounce to know if the foods they’re buying are healthy. In fact, the nation’s beverage companies, the largest, just announced that they’re going to be providing clearly visible information about calories on the front of their products and on their vending machines and soda fountains. And this is a step in the right direction. It’s an important step, but it’s still only one step. And we have so many more ahead.

    We can’t forget, for example, that 31 million of our children participate in federal school meal programs. So we don’t want to be in the position where we take one step forward with parents making good decisions, but then we take two steps back when lunch time rolls around at school and kids are faced with poor choices in the school cafeteria.

    So let’s move to get healthier food into our nation’s schools, and that’s the second part of this initiative. There’s a reason why our governors are such passionate advocates for our school meal programs. It’s because you all know the impact that these programs have. You know that when kids get the nutrition they need, they perform better in the classroom and they miss fewer days of school. So let’s multiply that by 31 million, and we are talking about a serious impact on education in this country.

    That’s why we’ve set a goal of doubling the number of schools in the HealthierUS School Challenge. And we’ve already gotten several major food suppliers to commit to offering healthier school meals.

    We’re also updating and strengthening the Child Nutrition Act. Secretary Vilsack is taking the lead on these efforts, and we plan to invest an additional $10 billion over 10 years to fund that legislation. This will allow us to serve 1 million more kids in the first five years, and dramatically improve the quality of food in our schools — decreasing sugar, fat, and salt; and increasing fruits, vegetables, and whole grains.

    But our success here is up to you. It’s up to you to get that — get the most out of these new investments. And maybe that means demanding more from your suppliers in your state, or maybe renegotiating your contracts to include healthier options. Maybe it means starting a farm-to-school program or insisting on healthier options in school vending machines, which, by the way, has actually meant increased revenues in schools in Kentucky and Maine and elsewhere.

    But while school meals provide critical nutrition for millions of kids, we also can’t forget that kids get plenty of their calories at home, right in their own neighborhoods. And many of our kids live in what we call "food deserts," and these are areas without access to a grocery store. Imagine that, living in a community without a grocery store. So too many of those calories at home come from fast food or processed foods from the local gas station or convenience store.

    So that’s why the third component of "Let’s Move" is, let’s move to ensure that all our families have access to healthy, affordable food in their communities. Right now there are food deserts in every single state in this country, so we’ve set an ambitious goal, and that is to eliminate every last one of those food deserts within seven years.

    And to achieve this, we’ve created the Healthy Food Financing Initiative that is modeled on what was so successful in Pennsylvania. We’ll start with an initial investment of $400 million a year. And we’ll use that to leverage hundreds of millions more from the private and non-profit sectors to bring grocery stores to underserved areas across the country.

    And once again, our success here is going to depend so much on what you do. We need you to encourage communities to apply for these grants, and provide the right incentives — from helpful zoning laws, to remapped transit routes that help shoppers access stores, to job training to entice grocers with a well-prepared workforce.

    But we know that eating right is only part of the battle. We all know that in our own lives. We know that physical activity is critical, too — not just for better health but for better academic achievement. Experts recommend that kids get at least 60 minutes of active play each day. And we know that many of our kids aren’t anywhere close to that. So let’s move — and I mean that literally. We have to move to find new ways for our kids to be physically active both in and out of school.

    And I have to say that many of you have been very creative on this piece already. Folks in West Virginia have taken the lead in bringing DDR — that’s Dance, Dance Revolution — it’s a new video game that gets kids up and moving. Many other states use it as well. And let me tell you, I can attest to Dance, Dance Revolution. We got it at Camp David, and it will make you sweat. (Laughter.) And it is addictive in a very good way. The President still can’t do it. (Laughter.)

    Georgia is using a program called HOPSports, and they’re beaming in videos of famous athletes into gym classes so kids can learn skills and techniques from their heroes and their role models.

    And to build on these efforts, "Let’s Move" is going to work to modernize and expand the President’s Physical Fitness Challenge. And we’ve already recruited professional athletes from dozens of different sports leagues. They’re going to be involved to encourage our kids to get and stay active.

    So that’s just some of what we’re doing — just some of it. That’s how we’re working to attack this problem from every single angle. Because that’s the thing about this issue of childhood obesity — it has so many different causes. There are so many different culprits, and it’s not enough to tackle any one of them alone, because we can give our kids the healthiest school meals imaginable, but if the rest of their calories come from the corner store or drive-through, then they still won’t get adequate nutrition. And we can have shiny new supermarkets on every block in every community, but if parents don’t have the information they need, they’ll still struggle to make the right choices for their kids.

    So we need a comprehensive, coordinated approach to this problem. But that doesn’t necessarily mean an expensive approach, because I know that many of you are stretched thinner than ever in these times, and don’t actually have money to spare. But often it’s about doing more with what you already have. If you’re already paving a new road, for example, why not add a sidewalk or a bike path, too? Or if you’re already building a housing development, why not add a playground? If you’ve got school gyms or playing fields empty after hours, why not find a way to open them up to the community at night or on the weekends?

    I also want to be clear that "comprehensive and coordinated" doesn’t mean centralized. I’ve spoken to so many experts on this issue, and not a single one of them has said that the solution is for the federal government to tell people what to do. That doesn’t work. There is no one-size-fits-all answer to this problem. Because what works in Rhode Island might not work in Arizona. What’s perfect for Hawaii might not be right for Minnesota. Different states, as you know, have different needs and different priorities and different resources.

    And you all know best what’s going to work for the people that you serve. You know what’s working and you know what isn’t. That’s why the NGA’s efforts to support this issue and to provide best practice is going to be so valuable. It has already been. That’s why I’ve reached out to so many of you to get your ideas and your input and to learn more about how we can help you. And I want to hear from every single state, of every size, from every region. I want to work with leaders from both parties, because the way I see this, there is nothing Democratic or Republican, there is nothing liberal or conservative about wanting our kids to lead active, healthy lives.

    There’s no place for politics when it comes to fighting childhood obesity. And I know all of you agree; I know that. You know that — (applause) — you know that because with a phone call or the stroke of a pen, you can determine whether a child can see a doctor or get a decent education or have a safe place to play, because you all are fighting the real battles every day on behalf of our kids, and you don’t have time for the fake battles. You’re interested in what works, what makes a real difference in people’s lives, what will make things better for the next generation.

    It’s funny, because that’s what drove President Theodore Roosevelt to call the very first meeting of this organization a century ago to speak to America’s governors about conservation — about preserving America’s beauty and bounty not just for the current generation but for generations to come.

    Working for the next generation is what drives so many Americans to do what they do — to work that extra shift, to take that extra job, to go without themselves just so that their kids can have more than they did. It’s what we’ve always done in this country. I know my parents have done it for me. They measured their success by the success of their children, by whether their children were happier and healthier and had a better shot at fulfilling their dreams than they did.

    That’s why so many of you got involved in politics in the first place — to leave something better for those who are going to come after you. And in the end, that’s what "Let’s Move" is all about. It is simple. Let’s stop wringing our hands and talking about it and citing statistics. Let’s act. Let’s move. Let’s give our kids the future they deserve.

    Look, I look forward to working with all of you in these efforts over the months and years ahead. I’m going to need you. I’m going to need you championing these causes, giving me feedback, giving me direction and guidance. It will not work any other way. And our kids can’t afford for us to get this wrong, and we know it.

    So thank you in advance for your help, and I look forward to seeing you all on the dance floor tomorrow night. (Laughter.) Thank you so much. (Applause.)

    END
    11:33 A.M. EST

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • President Obama Signs Maryland Disaster Declaration

    02.19.10 05:23 PM

    The President today declared a major disaster exists in the State of Maryland and ordered Federal aid to supplement State and local recovery efforts in the area struck by a severe winter storm and snowstorm during the period of December 18-20, 2009.

    Federal funding is available to State and eligible local governments and certain private nonprofit organizations on a cost-sharing basis for emergency protective measures in the counties of Baltimore, Caroline, Cecil, Harford, Howard, Kent, Montgomery, and Queen Anne’s.

    In addition, assistance is available to the State and eligible local governments on a cost-sharing basis for emergency protective measures, including snow assistance, for a continuous 48-hour period during or proximate to the incident period.

    W. Craig Fugate, Administrator, Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Department of Homeland Security, named Regis Leo Phelan as the Federal Coordinating Officer for Federal recovery operations in the affected area.

    FEMA said additional designations may be made at a later date if requested by the State and warranted by the results of further damage assessments.

    FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: FEMA (202) 646-3272.

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • Weekly Address: President Obama Says it is Time to Move Forward on Health Care Reform

    02.20.10 03:00 AM

    WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama used his weekly address to call on Democratic and Republican leaders to attend next week’s health care meeting in good faith to find reforms that work for American families and small businesses. With several health insurance companies announcing steep hikes in their rates – from 10 to over 30 percent – it is clear that the status quo, while good for the insurance industry, is bad for the American people. After a year of exhaustive debate, it is time to move forward on reform.

    The full audio of the address is HERE. The video can be viewed online at www.whitehouse.gov.

    Remarks of President Barack Obama
    Weekly Address
    February 20, 2010

    The other week, men and women across California opened up their mailboxes to find a letter from Anthem Blue Cross. The news inside was jaw-dropping. Anthem was alerting almost a million of its customers that it would be raising premiums by an average of 25 percent, with about a quarter of folks likely to see their rates go up by anywhere from 35 to 39 percent.

    Now, after their announcement stirred public outcry, Anthem agreed to delay their rate hike until May 1st while the situation is reviewed by the state of California. But it’s not just Californians who are being hit by rate hikes. In Kansas, one insurance company raised premiums by 10 to 20 percent only after asking to raise them by 20 to 30 percent. Last year, Michigan Blue Cross Blue Shield raised rates by 22 percent after asking to raise them by up to 56 percent. And in Maine, Anthem is asking to raise rates for some folks by about 23 percent.

    The bottom line is that the status quo is good for the insurance industry and bad for America. Over the past year, as families and small business owners have struggled to pay soaring health care costs, and as millions of Americans lost their coverage, the five largest insurers made record profits of over $12 billion.

    And as bad as things are today, they’ll only get worse if we fail to act. We’ll see more and more Americans go without the coverage they need. We’ll see exploding premiums and out-of-pocket costs burn through more and more family budgets. We’ll see more and more small businesses scale back benefits, drop coverage, or close down because they can’t keep up with rising rates. And in time, we’ll see these skyrocketing health care costs become the single largest driver of our federal deficits.

    That’s what the future is on track to look like. But it’s not what the future has to look like. The question, then, is whether we will do what it takes, all of us – Democrats and Republicans – to build a better future for ourselves, our children, and our country.

    That’s why, next week, I am inviting members of both parties to take part in a bipartisan health care meeting, and I hope they come in a spirit of good faith. I don’t want to see this meeting turn into political theater, with each side simply reciting talking points and trying to score political points. Instead, I ask members of both parties to seek common ground in an effort to solve a problem that’s been with us for generations.

    It’s in that spirit that I have sought out and supported Republican ideas on reform from the very beginning. Some Republicans want to allow Americans to purchase insurance from a company in another state to give people more choices and bring down costs. Some Republicans have also suggested giving small businesses the power to pool together and offer health care at lower prices, just as big companies and labor unions do. I think both of these are good ideas – so long as we pursue them in a way that protects benefits, protects patients, and protects the American people. I hope Democrats and Republicans can come together next week around these and other ideas.

    To members of Congress, I would simply say this. We know the American people want us to reform our health insurance system. We know where the broad areas of agreement are. And we know where the sources of disagreement lie. After debating this issue exhaustively for a year, let’s move forward together. Next week is our chance to finally reform our health insurance system so it works for families and small businesses. It’s our chance to finally give Americans the peace of mind of knowing that they’ll be able to have affordable coverage when they need it most.

    What’s being tested here is not just our ability to solve this one problem, but our ability to solve any problem. Right now, Americans are understandably despairing about whether partisanship and the undue influence of special interests in Washington will make it impossible for us to deal with the big challenges that face our country. They want to see us focus not on scoring points, but on solving problems; not on the next election but on the next generation. That is what we can do, and that is what we must do when we come together for this bipartisan health care meeting next week. Thank you, and have a great weekend.

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • President Obama Announces Help for Hardest Hit Housing Markets

    02.19.10 10:19 AM

    Funding will Help Address Urgent Problems Facing Homeowners at the Center of the Housing Crisis

    LAS VEGAS, NEVADA — Today, President Obama, with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, announced funding for innovative measures to help families in the states that have been hit the hardest by the aftermath of the housing bubble. In each of these states, the average price for all homes in the state has fallen more than 20% from the peak.

    Home prices across the country are beginning to stabilize since the Administration’s economic policies began to take effect in mid-2009. But the legacy of price declines, together with the effects of high unemployment, means that many working and middle class families in these especially hard-hit areas are facing serious challenges, in many cases beyond what their families’ resources can handle. This new innovation fund will help housing finance agencies in the hardest-hit areas and localities further respond to the most pressing problems in their communities.

    President Obama said, “During these difficult economic times, we will work to help responsible homeowners stay in their homes and stabilize the housing market so home values can rise. This program will allow housing finance agencies in the places hardest-hit by the housing crisis find innovative ways to help homeowners stay afloat, and empower local agencies that know these communities best. With the help of Harry, Tim and Shaun, we’ll continue to work together to stabilize the mortgage markets and hasten our recovery.”

    Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said, "I have been working with President Obama and his administration on solutions to address Nevada’s housing crisis for a while now and this policy will help people who are struggling. This will be an important step toward helping to keep people in their homes and assisting those who are underwater. I thank President for working with me on this important Nevada issue."

    Secretary of the Treasury Timothy Geithner said, "This innovative program will allow us to work directly with states and localities to tailor housing assistance to local needs. It’s an opportunity to provide additional relief to the hardest hit states while continuing to strengthen our housing market stabilization efforts."

    Secretary of Housing and Urban Development Shaun Donovan said, “Although the housing market has come a long way in just one year, there are many communities like Las Vegas that are still struggling. The funding announced today will help target resources to those hardest hit markets, promoting innovation that tailors programs to meet local needs and complementing our national foreclosure relief efforts.”

    A full fact sheet is below:

    Help for the Hardest-Hit Housing Markets
    1. $1.5 Billion to Work with State Housing Agencies to Innovate and Help Address the Problems Facing the Hardest-Hit Housing Markets

    There will be a formula for allocating funding among eligible states that will be based on home price declines and unemployment. HFAs must submit a program design to Treasury. ;Programs may include: Measures for unemployed homeowners; Programs to assist borrowers owing more than their home is now worth; Programs that help address challenges arising from second mortgages; or Other programs encouraging sustainable and affordable homeownership. 2. Accountability and Transparency for these Housing Programs

    All funded program designs posted online. Accountability for results – program effectiveness measured and results published online. Effective oversight under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008. Help for the Hardest Hit Housing Markets

    This new program will apply to states that have suffered an average home price drop of over 20% from the peak. State and local Housing Finance Agencies (HFAs) in each state are already familiar with the urgent challenges facing their communities and have demonstrated the ability to address these challenges. For that reason, we will work with these HFAs to expand the capacity to help address these challenges, with $1.5 billion from the funds set aside for housing under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 (EESA).

    The HFAs will determine the priorities facing their local markets. The program will be under strict transparency and accountability rules. The increase in HFA activities in these areas will support families in these markets, combining with the numerous other steps the Administration has taken to address housing markets.

    Funds can be used for innovation to take steps to address difficult, locally-important challenges for the hardest-hit housing markets, including unemployed borrowers, underwater borrowers, and second liens.

    Programs must meet funding requirements under EESA. These include that the recipient of funds must be an eligible financial institution and that the funds must be used to pay for mortgage modifications or for other permitted uses under EESA. Treasury will announce maximum state level allocations in the next two weeks, along with rules governing the submission of program designs by HFAs, and provide a period thereafter for HFAs to submit their program designs in order to receive funding.

    Illustrations of the Sorts of Programs that May be Funded in the States

    Housing markets vary considerably from state to state, and often within a single state. Housing Finance Agencies are intimately engaged already in their local housing markets, and will play the lead role in determining what sorts of programs are most appropriate to local conditions. Three sorts of problems that may be addressed with funding are unemployed borrowers, underwater borrowers, and second liens:

    1. Unemployed borrowers. Since the recession began in 2008, unemployment has hit many families who own homes. In previous times, when house prices were rising, families with unemployment could often sell their homes for more than they had paid, using the proceeds to tide them over.

    Today, by contrast, families in states where prices have dropped more than 20% often find themselves owing more than the house is worth in the current market. Such homes are often difficult to sell, and families with unemployment often can’t pay the current mortgage and may not have enough income to qualify for a modification.

    In such circumstances, one use of funds would be for HFAs to begin programs to help unemployed homeowners until they have secured a new job. HFAs can consider a variety of programs to help unemployed borrowers.

    2. Underwater borrowers. For states with more than 20% home price declines, a large portion of homeowners are “underwater” — they owe more than the house is worth in the current market. Such borrowers often find it difficult to sell their homes — lenders may not agree to a sale that fails to pay back a mortgage in full. HFAs may experiment with programs that would assist borrowers to negotiate with lenders to write down mortgages.

    3. Second liens. An important challenge can arise for some borrowers who have a home equity line of credit or other second mortgage on their home. Often, a first mortgage lender who may be willing to modify the loan by reducing principal can run into difficulties in coordinating between the first and second mortgage lender. To smooth this coordination problem, and help assure that homeowners get an overall modification that works best, funds can be used to pay incentives to the second mortgage holders, addressing this potential obstacle to reducing principal and keeping borrowers in their homes.

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • Remarks by The President At Town Hall Meeting In Henderson, Nevada

    02.19.10 01:30 PM

    9:58 A.M. PST

    THE PRESIDENT: Hello, Henderson! Thank you! Thank you so much, everybody. Everybody, have a seat, have a seat. I am thrilled to be here. (Applause.)

    AUDIENCE MEMBER: We love you, Mr. President!

    THE PRESIDENT: I love you back. (Applause.)

    We’ve got some special guests here — everybody is a special guest, but I just want to acknowledge a few folks here. Secretary of State Ross Miller in the house. (Applause.) Two outstanding members of Congress — Representative Shelley Berkley — (applause) — and your own Dina Titus. (Applause.)

    Senate Majority Leader Steven Horsford. (Applause.) We’ve got State Assembly Majority Leader John Oceguera. (Applause.) Clark County Commissioner Chairman Rory Reid. (Applause.) Henderson Mayor Andy Hafen. (Applause.) Former Governor Bob Miller. (Applause.)

    We’ve got — first, can everybody give a huge round of applause for Tina Long for the great introduction of Harry Reid? (Applause.) Green Valley High School principal Jeff Horn. (Applause.) Obviously not exam time yet. (Laughter.) Get’s a standing "O."

    The Green Valley High School Marching Band that played at my inauguration — give them a big round of applause. (Applause.) They played "Viva Las Vegas." (Laughter.) At the reviewing stand — they did. (Laughter.)

    And finally, he may have already been acknowledged — I want to give a special acknowledgment to Greg Koehler, North Las Vegas Fire Department, who just returned from 14 days in Haiti giving medical assistance to orphans — (applause.) Thank you. (Applause.) We’re proud of you. Thank you.

    Now, it’s good to be back in Nevada — (applause) — good to be back in Vegas. (Applause.) Good to be back in Henderson. (Applause.) And good to be with my good friend, your great senator, Harry Reid. (Applause.)

    I understand Henderson is where Harry went to school as a boy and fought in the ring as an amateur boxer. Now, looking at Harry, you wouldn’t say that — (laughter) — I mean, let’s face it — (laughter) — but I can personally attest that Harry Reid is one of the toughest people I know. He does not give up. He knows what he cares about. He knows what he believes in and he’s willing to fight for it. And sometimes he takes his licks, but he gets back up. Harry Reid has never stopped fighting — he hasn’t stopped fighting for Henderson; he hasn’t stopped fighting for Nevada; he has not stopped fighting for the United States of America and middle-class families all across this country that need a fair shake. (Applause.)

    I’m looking forward to hearing what’s on your minds and trying to answer a few questions. But before I do, let me say a few words about the situation that folks are facing right now.

    Harry is not one for sugarcoating things — I don’t know if you noticed that. He’s kind of a blunt guy. (Laughter.) Neither am I. These are tough times. When President Kennedy was here, he called Henderson a "city of destiny" because he saw its potential as Las Vegas grew. But for too long, I know many of you have felt like your destiny has been slipping beyond your control.

    You don’t need me to tell you that. All of you in some way have felt this recession. You felt it in the tourism and hospitality industry. You felt it in the construction industry. The unemployment rate here is 13 percent, which is the second highest in the nation. Foreclosures are also among the highest. Home values have fallen by more than almost anyplace else. And this is after a decade when, for most middle-class families, incomes actually shrank and wages flat-lined, and the only thing rising faster was medical costs and the cost of education.

    So I know it’s tough out there. Harry Reid knows it’s tough out there. That’s why we asked you to send us to Washington. We didn’t run for the fancy title or a big desk or a comfy chair. We didn’t run because it was fun to get your name in the newspapers — most of the time, it’s not. (Laughter.) We didn’t run so a bunch of folks on cable TV could chatter about you. (Laughter.) And we didn’t run to kick our problems down the road. We ran to solve problems that folks like you are facing every single day. (Applause.) That’s why we ran for office. That’s why Harry wanted to be Majority Leader, and that’s why I wanted to be President of the United States — to help you. (Applause.)

    When my administration took office, our immediate mission was clear. We needed to stop the great recession from turning into a great depression. And economists of every stripe were warning that was a real possibility. And that meant that we had to make some decisions swiftly, boldly, and not always popular, but decisions that were necessary. It wasn’t a time for satisfying the politics of the moment, it wasn’t time for just playing to the cameras — it was time for doing what was right.

    That’s why we helped stabilize our financial system — not because we felt any compassion for big banks, but because not doing so would have endangered the savings and dreams of millions more Americans. (Applause.)

    And by the way, I was committed to ensuring that if taxpayers were going to provide temporary assistance to keep our financial system afloat, then it actually had to be temporary. And I was determined to get back every single dime, and we are well on our way to doing that — getting back every single dime from those banks. (Applause.)

    In fact, one battle we’re having right now is we think the largest banks should be assessed a fee so that taxpayers are held harmless for the assistance that you’ve been giving. (Applause.) As you might imagine, the banks are not enthusiastic about that. (Laughter.) And it won’t surprise you to learn that they’ve got a few friends in Congress who are willing to go along, but you know Harry Reid is not one of those folks who are willing to go along. (Applause.) We’re going to get your money back because Harry Reid is going to make sure you get your money back. (Applause.)

    We helped shore up the American auto industry. That wasn’t popular. I understood why. Folks felt like these companies should reap the consequences of bad management decisions in the past, just like any other company would. But if we had let GM and Chrysler go under, it would have been hundreds of thousands of hardworking Americans who paid the price — not just folks at those companies themselves, but at suppliers and dealers all across the country.

    So we told them, if you’re willing to take the tough and painful steps you make — that are needed for you to become more competitive, then we’re willing to invest in your future. And as a result, auto production in the United States of America is up 69 percent from the first three months of 2009. (Applause.) GM’s CEO recently said that the company would repay $6.7 billion in loans from taxpayers — with interest — by June of this year. (Applause.)

    Now, one of the things you need to know is that the steps we’ve taken to shore up the banks and the autos, they have nothing to do with the Recovery Act. Those were separate. We had to do those as emergency measures. And I just want to point this out — Harry Reid, he’s got his pollsters; I’ve got my pollsters. We knew that this wasn’t going to be popular. But we did it because it was the right thing to do. (Applause.)

    So it’s also why we passed the Recovery Act. Now, a lot of people think that the stimulus package, the Recovery Act — if you listen on television, you’d think, well, that’s all about giving banks money. That has nothing to do with the banks. The other week, I saw a poll that said Americans, they don’t like the Recovery Act — they just like all the individual parts of the Recovery Act. (Laughter.)

    And the reason is, they think the Recovery Act is for banks and auto companies. When you ask folks about what was actually in the Recovery Act, they think it’s full of good ideas — like tax cuts, like infrastructure investment, like unemployment relief. That’s what the Recovery Act was. It was tax cuts for small business owners and 95 percent of you. You may not have noticed — 95 percent of you got a tax cut — because of Harry Reid and because of the Recovery Act. (Applause.) One million people in the state of Nevada.

    We expanded unemployment insurance at a time when it was absolutely vital for people as they were trying to stay afloat. (Applause.) More than a quarter-million of your members — of your neighbors. It was jobs for construction workers and jobs for cops and firemen, jobs for almost 2,000 education professionals right here in Nevada.

    I haven’t talked to the principal, but I guarantee you, we would have seen some very difficult decisions having to be made about maintaining teachers right here at Green Valley, if it hadn’t been for the help that Harry Reid provided last year. (Applause.) You would have seen some very tough choices.

    All of this — from the tax cuts to the unemployment insurance to the jobs — that was only possible because of Harry’s leadership. And as a result, our economy is growing again. Almost two million Americans who would otherwise be employed [sic] are working right now — because of what Harry Reid did. (Applause.) We’re no longer staring into an economic abyss — because of what Harry Reid helped to do.

    Now, he and I both know that’s little comfort to the seven million Americans who lost their job in this recession. It’s little comfort to homeowners who are facing foreclosure or steep declines in their home values, or to students who are having to delay their college plans because they can’t afford it, or older folks who are postponing retirement.

    That’s why I’m not going to rest. That’s not — why we’re not done. That’s why Harry Reid isn’t going to rest until all of America is working again, until the dream of home ownership is secure once again, and until our economy is benefiting not just Wall Street but benefiting hardworking Nevada families, benefiting the middle class, benefiting Americans all across this great country of ours. That’s what we are aiming to do. (Applause.)

    Now, I’ve said before that the way I measure our economy’s strength — the way you measure it — is by whether jobs and wages and incomes are growing. But the other way we measure is by whether families have a roof over their heads and whether folks are living out that American Dream of owning a home. That dream has been jeopardized in this recession for a lot of people, especially right here in Nevada.

    Now, part of it was — I’ve got to be blunt here, I got to be honest — part of it was because too many lenders were focused on making a quick buck instead of acting responsibly. (Applause.) And, if we’re honest, too many borrowers acted irresponsibly at certain points, taking on mortgages that they knew they couldn’t afford. (Applause.) And what happened was the regulators in Washington and legislators too often turned a blind eye to the excesses and the failures on Wall Street that fed a housing bubble. And now that that bubble has burst, it’s left devastation that we’re still grappling with today.

    Now, government has a responsibility to help deal with this problem. Government can’t solve this problem alone. We got to be honest about that. Government alone can’t solve this problem. And it shouldn’t. But government can make a difference. It can’t stop every foreclosure, and tax dollars shouldn’t be used to reward the very irresponsible lenders and borrowers who helped bring about the housing crisis. But what we can do is help families who’ve done everything right stay in their homes whenever possible. (Applause.) What we can do is stabilize the housing market so that home values can begin rising again.

    And that’s why we’re buying up vacant homes and converting them into affordable housing — creating jobs, stemming our housing crisis, growing the local economy. (Applause.) That’s why last year, we put a tax credit worth thousands of dollars into the pocket of 1.4 million Americans to help them buy their first home — first-time homebuyers credit. (Applause.) That’s why we’re offering over one million struggling homeowners lower monthly payments through our loan modification initiative.

    And that’s why today, thanks to the leadership of Harry Reid, I’m announcing a $1.5 billion fund for housing finance agencies in the states that are hardest hit by this housing crisis — and that means here in Nevada. (Applause.) Right here in Nevada. (Applause.)

    So this fund is going to help out-of-work homeowners avoid preventable foreclosures, and it will help homeowners who owe more than their homes are worth find a way to pay their mortgages that works for both the borrowers and the lenders alike, and will help folks who’ve taken out a second mortgage modify their loans.

    So, yes, we need to strengthen our housing market. And we need to focus on job creation and getting our economy moving again. But one last thing I want to be clear about — we can do all those things, dealing with sort of the emergency crisis, and still fall behind in the 21st century, in this global economy, unless we recommit ourselves to solving some of the long-term problems that have been with us for years.

    We’ve got to recognize, just like earlier generations, that our future is what we make of it, and unless we give everything we’ve got to securing America’s success in the 21st century, our children aren’t going to have the same opportunities.

    Now, I’ve traveled a lot over the last year, all over the world, and I’ve got to tell you, countries like China — they’re competing to win. And there’s nothing wrong with that. We want China to succeed. They’ve got a lot of poverty, much more poverty than we have here, and it’s good for their stability if they’re doing well. But I don’t know about you — I don’t intend to cede the 21st century to anybody else. (Applause.) America is not a nation that follows — America leads. That’s what I intend for us to do once again. (Applause.) America leads.

    So what does it mean to lead? It means countries that out-educate us today are going to out-compete us tomorrow. And that means America has to lead in education. (Applause.) That’s why we’re working with educators to transform our schools, and make college more affordable, and prepare our kids for science and engineering and technical degrees — because those are going to be the jobs of the future.

    And because the future belongs to countries that create the jobs of tomorrow, we’ve got to lead in energy. That’s why we’re investing in companies right here in Nevada and across this nation that produce solar power and wind power and the smart, energy-efficient electric grids — (applause) — the investments that are giving rise to a clean energy economy. (Applause.) It’s vital that we do that.

    Our nation can’t lead, we can’t prosper, if we’ve got a broken-down health care system that works better for the insurance companies than it does for ordinary Americans. (Applause.) And we can’t squander the opportunity to reform our health care system to make it work for everybody. (Applause.)

    That’s why this coming week I’m going to be meeting, and Harry is going to be meeting, with members of both parties and both chambers — we’re going to move forward the Democratic proposal; we hope the Republicans have one, too. And we’ll sit down and let’s hammer it out, go — we’ll go section by section.

    Because America can’t solve our economic problems unless we tackle some of these structural problems. And America can’t lead — we can’t succeed unless we’re also getting a handle on our debt. We’ve got to confront this fiscal crisis that has been brewing for years. That’s why we’re cutting what we don’t need to pay for what we do. That’s why I signed a law that says Americans should pay as we go and live within our means. (Applause.) That’s why yesterday I announced a bipartisan fiscal commission that will help us meet our fiscal challenges once and for all.

    Fiscal responsibility. Clean energy. A world-class education. A health care system that works. An economy that lifts up all our citizens. That’s how America can lead. That’s how the future will be won — with all of us coming together to win it — (applause) — Democrats and Republicans alike. (Applause.) And independents.

    With all the petty partisanship and game-playing in Washington, I know that sometimes you guys can feel pretty frustrated.

    AUDIENCE: Yesss!

    THE PRESIDENT: I know it can be easy to despair about whether we, as a nation, can come together anymore. But for those who wonder if America can unite, just come to Henderson. You think about it. This is a town that was founded during World War II to supply metal for planes, for guns, for the arsenal of democracy that freed the world from tyranny. This is a town — it wasn’t built by liberals or conservatives; it was built by Americans, by patriots who rallied around a common purpose in an hour of need. (Applause.) And I’m certain that if we can reclaim in this country the spirit of unity that built Henderson, Nevada, all those years ago, then we can build cities of destiny across this country. And the future will belong to the United States of America. (Applause.)

    Thank you. God bless you. God bless the United States of America. (Applause.) Thank you. Thank you. (Applause.)

    All right, everybody sit down. This is the — (applause.) Here’s where I’m on the hot seat, so I’ve got to take off my jacket. (Laughter.) Answer some questions. Everybody sit down. All right.

    Some of you have been to town halls before, so this is pretty straightforward. We’ve got people in the audience with mics, and just raise your hand — we’re going to go girl, boy, girl, boy — (laughter) — make sure it’s fair. And I’m going to try to take as many questions as I can in the time remaining. And when you — before you answer [sic] your question, if you can introduce yourself so that we know who you are. And try to make your question relatively brief so that we can get in as many as possible. All right?

    As I said, we’re going to go girl, boy, girl, boy. Young lady right there, yes.

    Q Thank you, President Obama. In Nevada —

    THE PRESIDENT: What’s your name?

    Q Oh, my name is Florence Jamison (phonetic.)

    THE PRESIDENT: Okay. How are you, Florence?

    Q I’m terrific.

    THE PRESIDENT: Great.

    Q In Nevada we have the second highest number of medically uninsured, about 325,000 uninsured. More than five working adults are colleagues who are dying each week because of no access to health care. I am the founder of Volunteers in Medicine, Southern Nevada — a free clinic which has been set up to help our sick and dying. There are hundreds of caring Nevadans that have rallied like a corps of angels to come and provide free health care for their struggling neighbors — housekeepers, operators, receptionists, eligibility workers, social workers, nurses, doctors.

    In your health reform bill you have a provision to protect the federally funded subsidized community clinics. It is not clear if they’re going to cover the free clinics where volunteers throughout the community have rallied to give support to their struggling neighbors in their great time of need. Can you help us with that?

    THE PRESIDENT: Well, thank you, first of all, for the great work that you guys are doing. So we appreciate that. (Applause.) But if you’re like a lot of free clinics across the country, I know you’re getting overwhelmed, because the need is so great.

    The bill that Harry and I have been working on would provide assistance to a whole range of community-based efforts — preventive care, wellness care — which is absolutely vital not only for the people who are receiving services at clinics like yours, but also for reducing the costs of health care overall, because the more that people have access to preventive care, the less likely they are to go to the emergency room when things are already out of hand.

    Now, let me just speak more broadly about health care, because we’re going to have a meeting with the Republicans, as I said, next week. I’ve got to admit that this has been an issue that I was warned I shouldn’t take on. (Laughter.) No, no, I mean, seriously. When I first came in — and Harry was part of some of these conversations — there were a lot of political advisors who said, look, health care is just too hard, it’s just too complicated. Everybody says in theory that they want to reform the health care system, but because it’s complicated, once you start putting a bill together you get all kinds of criticism; the insurance lobby will spend millions of dollars on advertising and TV, scaring the heck out of everybody; your poll numbers will go down, and you’re not going to get a lot of cooperation from the other side.

    I mean, that was the warning. Plus, because the economy is bad, a lot of people are already feeling kind of anxious, and so they’re thinking, gosh, we had to do all that stuff to fix the financial system, we had to do this stuff to fix the autos, we had this big recovery package, the deficits are going up — partly because tax revenues is not coming in and we’re having to spend more on unemployment insurance and things like that — this is probably not the time to be too ambitious.

    So I want to explain to everybody why I decided to take it on. First of all, I decided to take it on because I get a letter — or two, or five — every day from people who have lost their job and suddenly they don’t have health insurance, somebody in their family gets sick, and they lose their house. They were solid middle-class folks until they lost their job, and, lo and behold, they discovered they couldn’t get coverage because something had happened to them before. Maybe a woman had had breast cancer, and it was okay as long as she had her employer-based health care. But once she tried — once she lost her job and tried to get health care, couldn’t get it.

    I’ve looked too many parents in the eye who say, our children have these chronic diseases and we found out that our insurance only covered us up to a certain amount and then they hit a cap, and afterwards we had to hold bake sales and our neighbors had to raise money just to make sure that our kids would live. Too many stories like that. So that was the main reason that I said we had to take it on.

    But the second reason was because even if you’ve got health insurance, what’s happened to your premiums lately? Look, if this is a representative sample, I’m assuming that 85 percent of you have health care — maybe 90 percent — let’s say 85 percent of you have health care. Some of you are getting it through your jobs; some of you are still buying it individually, or you’re a small business owner and you’re purchasing it. No matter what your situation, I guarantee you your costs have gone up at least double digits over the last year. They have doubled over the last decade. And they’re going to more than double over the next decade if we don’t do anything. So even if you’re lucky enough to have health care, it is digging deeper and deeper into your pocket.

    They just had — some of you saw the news — for people who don’t have insurance through a big employer, the individual market, in California one of the biggest insurance providers, Anthem Blue Cross, just announced that they were going to raise rates on these folks by up to 39 percent — up to 39 percent.

    That’s the future. That’s the future, Henderson. That’s going to be one of the main things that helps to bankrupt local school districts, because all these teachers, all these employees, those health care costs go up. Universities — those young people who are about to go to college, part of the reason your tuition is going up is because every employee at the university, their health care costs are going up. And that gets passed on to you.

    And, finally, the third reason that we had to take this on is because the deficit and the debt that you hear everybody getting in a tizzy about — properly so — the vast majority of our long-term debt is driven by Medicare and Medicaid. It’s driven by our rising health care costs. Nothing comes close. You could eliminate every earmark, you could eliminate foreign aid, you could eliminate all that stuff — it would amount to about 5 percent of the budget. Most of it is health care costs.

    And as the population gets older, they use more health care; that drives it up even faster. And pretty soon, pretty soon the entire federal budget is going to be gobbled up by these rising health care costs. And you’re already seeing it at the state level here in Nevada, right? What’s happening with Medicaid? The governor is starting to talk about having to cut all kinds of aspects of Medicaid because of the cost.

    So here’s my point. We can’t wait to reform the health care system. It is vital for our economy. (Applause.) It is vital for our economy to change how health care works in this country. It’s vital. (Applause.)

    Now, having said all that, the people who were giving me advice at the beginning of the year were right — health care has been knocking me around pretty good. (Laughter.) It’s been knocking Harry around pretty good. And Harry has shown extraordinary courage because he said, you know what, Barack, we are going to get this done. I know it’s costing me politically but it’s important, it’s the right thing to do. (Applause.) That’s what he’s been saying consistently, and I’m proud of him for it.

    So let me — just very quickly, let me describe what it is that we have proposed — and I’m waiting to see what the Republicans propose in turn — because there’s been a lot of misinformation here. What we have said is this: If you have health insurance, we are going to pass a series of health reforms so that the insurance companies have to treat you fairly — it’s very straightforward — that they can’t prevent you from getting health insurance because of a preexisting condition; that they can’t put a lifetime cap so in the fine print it turns out that you’re not fully covered. (Applause.) So there are a whole series of insurance reforms — that’s number one.

    Number two, we’ve got a whole series of cost controls. So what we’re saying is, for example, that every insurer, they’ve got to spend the vast majority of your premiums on actual care, as opposed to profits and overhead. (Applause.) We’re saying that we’ve got to get out some of the waste and abuse, including subsidies to insurance companies in the Medicare system that run in the tens of billions of dollars every year. (Applause.) That’s not a good use of your taxpayer dollars. And we’re working to improve wellness and prevention, as I said before, so that people aren’t going to the emergency room for care.

    Now, the third thing, and the thing that’s most controversial, sadly, is what we’re also saying is we’ve got to make sure that everybody can have access to coverage. And the way we do that is we set up something called an exchange, where essentially individuals and small businesses who aren’t getting a good deal because they don’t have the same negotiating power as the big companies when it comes to the insurance market, they can pool just like members of Congress and federal employees do in their health care plan — they can pool so that now they’ve got the purchasing power of a million people behind them and they can get a better deal. That can lower their costs. And we’ll give subsidies for working families who can’t afford it even with lower premium costs. (Applause.)

    Now, so I want everybody to pay attention next Thursday when we have this health care summit. You may not want to watch all six or eight hours of it, you got things to do. (Laughter.) But pay attention to what this debate is about, because there’s been so much talk about death panels and adding to the deficit, and this and that and the other. Pay attention, because this is — what we’re proposing has nothing to do with a government takeover of a health care. Most of you would have the exact same health care that you’ve got right now, but you’d be more protected and more secure. And if you don’t have health care, you’d have a chance of getting health care.

    And, by the way, it would actually save us money in the long term, because all those wasteful dollars that we’re spending right now, the experts estimate we’d actually save a trillion dollars by passing it. (Applause.)

    Now, I think it’s the right thing to do. The Republicans say — the Republicans say that they’ve got a better way of doing it. So I want them to put it on the table — (applause) — because as I told them — as I told them a while back, look, I mean, I’m not a — I’m not an unreasonable guy. (Laughter.) If you show me that you can do the things we just talked about — protect people from insurance problems, make sure that the costs are controlled, and people who don’t have health insurance are covered — and you can do it cheaper than me, then why wouldn’t I do that? I’ll just grab your idea and say, great, and take all the credit. I’d be happy to do it. (Applause.)

    So show me what you got. But don’t let the American people go another year, another 10 years, another 20 years without health insurance reform in this country. (Applause.)

    Okay, it’s a gentleman’s turn. It’s a man’s turn. This guy over here. This guy with a beard.

    Q Thank you, Mr. President. Ben Burris (phonetic), from Jonesboro, Arkansas.

    THE PRESIDENT: What are you doing all the way here in Vegas?

    Q Everybody comes to Vegas. (Laughter.)

    THE PRESIDENT: That’s what I’m talking about. There you go. Everybody comes to Vegas. (Applause.) Yes. Now, here’s my only question, Ben. Have you spent some money here in Vegas?

    Q Oh, yes, sir.

    THE PRESIDENT: He says "Yes, sir." (Applause.)

    Q Yes, sir.

    THE PRESIDENT: He’s spending some money here in Vegas. All right. That’s good. We like to see that. All right, what’s your question?

    Q Well, sir, I’m reasonably familiar with the current and proposed legislature as it applies to dentistry and oral health. And my question is, what’s your vision for how dentistry will fit into your larger framework for health care reform?

    THE PRESIDENT: Are you a dentist yourself?

    Q Yes, sir. So if somebody has a heart attack, you better still call 9-1-1. (Laughter.) Just a dentist.

    THE PRESIDENT: Now, it is interesting that you raised this. It turns out — this is serous — that dental hygiene is actually very important for keeping your heart healthy. It turns out that heart disease can be triggered when you’ve got gum disease. So everybody floss. That’s my first — am I right? You got to floss. (Applause.)

    It is my hope that we can include dental care in the various proposals that we’re putting forward. Dental and vision care are very important. Now, I’ll tell you that some folks will say we can’t afford it. Some states in their Medicaid program cover dental; some states don’t.

    At minimum — at minimum, I think it’s very important that we’ve got dental care for our kids. (Applause.) Because what happens is, is that if we can keep our children’s teeth healthy, then usually that means they’ve got healthy teeth as adults. And if not, oftentimes that actually distracts them and prevents them from learning, because both dental and eye care — a lot of kids end up being distracted. They can’t read the blackboard, they’ve got a cavity that’s been untreated. It’s a huge problem.

    So I would like to see dental care covered. I will tell you that some folks are going to say we can’t afford it. At minimum, I’d like to see that our children have the care that they need. (Applause.)

    Q Can I say one more thing, sir? I think most of us in dentistry think that health care is the primary need here in terms of that, and children as well. So we think that if you can take care of health care first and let dentistry — do that kind of thing — it’s more important to take care of the health care first. Thank you, sir.

    THE PRESIDENT: There you go. All right, I appreciate that. Thank you. (Applause.)

    Okay, it’s a young lady’s turn. It’s so hard to choose. Okay, I’ll call on this young lady back here, right over here. Yes, you. (Laughter.) All right, we got to get the young man with the mic over to you.

    Q Thank you, Mr. President. Thank God for this opportunity. I realize that insurance and medical care has been a major issue. This is my problem. I worked for United Airlines for nearly 30 years. I was severely injured during flight. I have a workman comp’s case that have fallen on deaf ear. The conflict in this city with the lawyers and the doctors and this whole problem has drove my life really to almost not having a life at all.

    I don’t know where else to turn. I don’t know who else to talk to about the problem. I’ve written you letters. I’ve written letters to many of the senators here in Las Vegas. I’ve talked to the doctors. I’ve done everything I know how to do. But I am a widow with a special needs child. I have lived in the house that I live in for 19 years. My house is in foreclosure. I have disability insurance. I have Social Security disability. That disability tells me, your insurance is not accepted here. I can’t get the medical help that I need to get better.

    THE PRESIDENT: What’s your —

    Q I’d love to be a flight attendant for you on that U.S. One. I’m trained on that U.S. One. (Laughter.)

    THE PRESIDENT: Well, look, in terms of your specific issue, come see Harry Reid and Harry Reid will see if he can help you out here. (Applause.) All right? Workman’s comp is generally a state issue as opposed to a federal issue. But Harry, he’s got a few connections here in Nevada, so I suspect that he can help out.

    But, look, to the larger point, there are a lot more people who are actually going on disability right now partly because job opportunities have shrunk. And that’s why it’s so important for us to really focus on jobs.

    Now, if you were listening to the Republicans, you’d think that last year we weren’t paying any attention to jobs, that we were just kind of — I don’t know what we were doing, Harry. I guess we were just sort of sitting around. (Laughter.) The truth is, is that everything we did last year was designed around how do we break the back of the recession and move the economic recovery forward in order to promote job growth.

    You can’t have job growth if the economy is contracting by 6 percent, because businesses look and they say nobody is spending money, we got no customers, we can’t hire. So the first thing we had to do was to make sure that companies were starting to make a profit again, and the economy was growing. We are now in that position, because of the work that Harry did and a lot of — and these two outstanding members of Congress did, Congresswoman Berkley and Titus. (Applause.) The economy is now growing again.

    But here is the challenge that we’ve got. The challenge we have is that after they’ve laid off 8 million people, now they’re growing with fewer people. So they’re making profits, but they haven’t started hiring yet. Our challenge is how do we get businesses to start hiring again?

    Now, some of the jobs, I’ll be honest with you, are probably not going to come back. And the reason is because people have installed new technologies, or they’ve set up new system where they can do more with fewer workers. That’s why it’s so important for us to invest in new industries and new technologies.

    I’ll give you an example. We were talking about autos before. Do you know that before the Recovery Act was passed, the United States was producing about 2 percent of the advanced batteries that are used in these clean cars, these electric cars? We were producing 2 percent of the batteries — less than 2 percent. What we did as part of the Recovery Act was invest in developing plants for battery production here in the United States. And do you know that in 18 months, we will have the capacity to produce 20 percent of the advanced batteries around the world? (Applause.) And by 2015, we’ll have the capacity to produce 40 percent of the batteries around the world. We’ve created an entire new industry — an entire new industry has been created here in the United States that can produce jobs.

    So we’ve got to constantly look for those opportunities in solar and in wind, and in other hi-tech areas, because that’s going to be the future. The more people have work available to them — there is just a virtuous cycle that happens. When people go to work, they feel good; their health is better; their kids do better in school — right? (Applause.) Business — they’ve got money to spend, they come to Vegas, right? Tourism industry starts taking off. (Applause.)

    So we’re going to be putting — Harry and I are working now on a jobs package for this year that’s designed not — it’s no longer designed to grow the economy. Now it’s designed to give incentives to businesses who are now making a profit to start hiring again, and to help small businesses get loans. Because a lot of small businesses are still having trouble getting loans from banks, even if they see an opportunity for business growth, and we want to make sure that they’ve got access to capital.

    All right, it’s a guy’s turn. I’m going to call on this guy, even though he’s got a Cubs jacket on. (Laughter.) Everybody knows I’m a White Sox fan, but I’m going to call — just to show that I’m unbiased, I’m calling on a Cubs guy. (Laughter.)

    Q You’re not a Cub hater.

    THE PRESIDENT: I’m not a Cub hater, that’s right.

    Q Okay, before I ask my question, I want to say something. I’m enrolled in a Medicare Advantage plan. I understand that my benefits will be cut with health reform. I’m all for it.

    THE PRESIDENT: Well, how about that? Let me — let me — before you ask your actual question, let me just make this point. We’re not actually eliminating Medicare Advantage. What Medicare Advantage is, is basically the previous administration had this idea, instead of traditional Medicare, let’s contract out to insurance companies to manage the Medicare program. And the insurance companies can then kind of package and pool providers of dental care or eye wear or what have you, and it’s a one-stop shop for seniors.

    Now, in theory that sounds like a pretty good idea, except as you might imagine if the insurance companies are involved that means they’ve got to make a profit. And what happened was they didn’t bid out competitively this Medicare Advantage program. So these insurance companies were just getting a sweet deal.

    All we’ve been saying is let’s make sure that there’s a competitive bidding process and that we are getting the absolute best bargain. (Applause.)

    But I appreciate your larger concern, which is let’s make sure that everybody has access to health care. And traditional Medicare, by the way, is a great deal. Everybody who is in it is pretty happy with it. But go ahead with your question.

    Q I’m going to introduce myself. My name is Norman — I live in north Las Vegas. I’m retired. (Applause.) And my question is about Social Security.

    THE PRESIDENT: Are you a former Chicagoan?

    Q Yes, sir.

    THE PRESIDENT: Where are you from in Chicago?

    Q Schaumburg last.

    THE PRESIDENT: Fantastic. Well, the weather is a little bit better here, I got to admit. (Laughter.)

    Q Well, we can visit snow here.

    THE PRESIDENT: Exactly. All right, go ahead.

    Q Well, my question is about Social Security. Now, I know there are a lot of myths out there, and I know you can dispel them. I saw an interview on "Meet The Press" with Alan Greenspan, who, as you know, was on the Social Security Commission in the ’80s. And Tim Russert asked him specifically, what about the crisis in Social Security? Alan Greenspan’s response was, there is no crisis in Social Security; it’s a payroll tax issue. Can you comment on that?

    THE PRESIDENT: Yes. Here’s the situation with Social Security. It is actually true that Social Security is not in crisis the way our health care system is in crisis. I mean, when you think about the big entitlement programs, you’ve got Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid. These are the big programs that take up a huge portion of the federal budget. Social Security is in the best shape of any of these, because basically the cost of Social Security will just go up with ordinary inflation, whereas health care costs are going up much faster than inflation.

    It is true that if we continue on the current path with Social Security, if we did nothing on Social Security, that at a certain point, in maybe 20 years or so, what would happen is that you start seeing less money coming into the payroll tax, because the population is getting older so you’ve got fewer workers, and more people are collecting Social Security so more money is going out, and so the trust fund starts dropping.

    And if we did nothing, then somewhere around 2040 what would happen would be a lot of the young people who would start collecting Social Security around then would find that they only got 75 cents on every dollar that they thought they were going to get. Everybody with me so far?
    All right. So slowly we’re running out of money.

    But the fixes that are required for Social Security are not huge, the way they are with Medicare. Medicare, that is a real problem. If we don’t get a handle on it, it will bankrupt us. With Social Security, we could make adjustments to the payroll tax. For example — I’ll just give you one example — right now, your Social Security — your payroll tax is capped at $109,000. So what that means is, is that — how many people — I don’t mean to pry into your business, but how many people here make less than $109,000 every year? (Laughter.) All right, this is a pretty rich audience — a lot of people kept their hands down. (Laughter.) I’m impressed. (Laughter.)

    No, look, what it means is basically for 95 percent of Americans, they pay — every dollar you earn, you pay into the payroll tax. But think about that other 5 percent that’s making more than $109,000 a year. Warren Buffett, he pays the payroll tax on the first $109,000 he makes, and then for the other $10 billion — (laughter) — he doesn’t pay payroll tax.

    So — yes, somebody said, "What?" (Laughter.) Yes, that’s right. That’s the way it works.

    So what we’ve said is, well, don’t we — doesn’t it make sense to maybe have that payroll tax cut off at a higher level, or have people — maybe you hold people harmless till they make $250,000 a year, but between $250,000 and a million or something, they start paying payroll tax again — just to make sure that the fund overall is solvent.

    So that would just be one example. That’s not the only way of fixing it, but if you made a slight adjustment like that, then Social Security would be there well into the future and it would be fine. All right? (Applause.)

    Okay. It’s a woman’s turn. Anybody — I’m going to go back here. Nobody’s got — these folks haven’t had a chance here. Hold on one second — I’m going to let you use my mic. You’ll give it back, right? (Laughter.) Okay.

    Q My name is Peggy — and I’m a native Nevadan, grew up in Boulder City. (Applause.) There’s a few of us here — known this great guy, Harry, all my life. And my question, which is near and dear to my heart, and there’s a few of my co-workers watching right now on television, and a few here — is we want to know what is going to be done for tourism in Nevada, particularly airlines. I am a U.S. Airways employee who has been furloughed for 17 months. They furloughed over 500 more just on the 14th, so there’s many, many of us now on the unemployment rolls. And we want to see what’s going to happen to bring our jobs back to Las Vegas. (Applause.)

    THE PRESIDENT: Well, first of all, obviously tourism is directly connected to the state of the economy as a whole. If people have disposable income, then they’re going to travel. And if they’re going to travel and have fun, they’re going to come to Las Vegas. (Applause.) Right? So — but on the other hand, if times are tight, they’re having trouble paying the bills, making the mortgage, et cetera, that means tourism declines.

    So everything we’re doing in terms of improving the economy as a whole will start improving tourism. But what is also true is that we can take some particular steps to help to encourage the tourism industry. And Harry, before we came out, was talking about a bipartisan tourism promotion/travel promotion act.

    Harry — I’m going to give the mic to Harry for a second. Harry, do you want to talk just a little bit about what would be in the act? (Applause.)

    SENATOR REID: We’re going to try to take that up next week. You’ll save a half a billion dollars over 10 years and create tens of thousands of jobs. We’re the only country in the world, major country in the world, that doesn’t promote itself. You’ll see on TV Jamaica does, New Zealand does, Australia does, South Africa does — but not the United States. We hope within two or three months we’ll be promoting ourselves. (Applause.)

    THE PRESIDENT: Good. Now, that’s the kind of leadership that Harry is showing. Let me make one last point about airlines in particular. There are two things that we can really do to help improve the airline industry.

    The first is on energy. Part of the reason that airlines are getting squeezed all the time is because their fuel costs are huge. That’s the single biggest problem for most airlines, is fuel costs that skyrocket or are unpredictable.

    And so if we’ve got a smart energy policy that is encouraging the use of electric cars and improving gas mileage, and making sure that we’re looking at alternative fuels like biofuels that can be used for trucks, all those things will help to reduce our dependence on foreign oil and, as a consequence, will, over time, stabilize fuel prices in a way that is very helpful to the airlines.

    The second thing that we need to do is we’ve got to upgrade our air traffic control system, which is a little creaky. And one of — don’t worry, I mean, it’s safe to travel. I’m not — (laughter) — I don’t want anybody to think, man, creaky, that doesn’t sound good. (Laughter.)

    What it is, is that because we don’t use the latest technologies, a lot of times the holding patterns for planes, how many planes can land safely at the same time, all those things are — reduce the efficiency of — the overall system is reduced because we’re not using the best technologies available.

    If we can upgrade those technologies, then we could reduce delays, we could reduce cancellations, we could reduce the amount of time that it takes when there’s bad weather for planes to land. And all that would also help improve profitability in the airlines industry, which in turn would mean that they would be able to hire more workers and provide outstanding customer service. Okay? (Applause.)

    All right. It’s a gentleman’s turn. This guy right here. He’s a big guy, he stood up and — he stood up, I thought, man, that’s a big guy, I better call on him. (Laughter.) Say you’re big, too — I agree. (Laughter.) Don’t worry, I’m not saying you’re not big. (Laughter.) All right, go ahead.

    Q Thank you, Mr. President. My name is Dr. Herve Misoko (phonetic). I am originally from France — actually from Africa, moved to France, and now I’m here in America because I believe — I still believe that America is the country of the American Dream. And I came here — I’m a scientist, president of a renewable energy startup, and I came here because I really believe that America can become the first country for clean energy. (Applause.)

    One of the comments I wanted to make, coming from Europe where carbon is regulated, I see firsthand — I have a company in France also — that regulation works. It creates job. My company has been growing 30 percent every year in France for the past two years. And I really want to see that happen here. And I think that even if you don’t believe in climate change, there’s like byproducts that are awesome jobs. The country is going to advance technology-wise. We’re going to become once again like we were with the space industry, the most advanced technologically country in the world. And so I really want to see these regulations happen because it’s going to help all of us in the clean energy business. (Applause.)

    THE PRESIDENT: Okay. Well, let me just talk about — this is — when the conservatives have their conventions and they yell at me and say how terrible I am — (laughter) — along with health care this is the other thing that they usually point out, which is that "the President wants to create this cap and trade system and it’s going to be a job killer and it’s one more step in the government takeover of the American economy." So this is a good place for me to maybe just spend a little time talking about energy and climate change.

    First of all, we just got five feet of snow in Washington and so everybody is like — a lot of the people who are opponents of climate change, they say, see, look at that, there’s all this snow on the ground, this doesn’t mean anything. I want to just be clear that the science of climate change doesn’t mean that every place is getting warmer; it means the planet as a whole is getting warmer. But what it may mean is, for example, Vancouver, which is supposed to be getting snow during the Olympics, suddenly is at 55 degrees, and Dallas suddenly is getting seven inches of snow.

    The idea is, is that as the planet as a whole gets warmer, you start seeing changing weather patterns, and that creates more violent storm systems, more unpredictable weather. So any single place might end up being warmer; another place might end up being a little bit cooler; there might end up being more precipitation in the air, more monsoons, more hurricanes, more tornadoes, more drought in some places, floods in other places.

    So I just — that’s one aspect of the science that I think everybody should understand. That’s point number one.

    Point number two: The best way for us to unleash the free market — the best way for us to unleash the free market and capitalism and innovation and dynamism in the energy sector is for us to fully take into account all the costs that go into producing energy and using energy.

    And what do I mean by that? Look, if you tell a company that there are no mileage standards on cars, then people end up making Hummers. Right? And everybody drives Hummers until finally gas gets so crazy and at a certain point people start saying maybe I should get a more fuel-efficient car.

    But if you’ve got a fuel-efficiency standard in place that says your car needs to get 20 miles a gallon or 30 miles a gallon, suddenly all these engineers are thinking, well, how do we do that? And all these companies start coming up with new technologies that make your cars more fuel-efficient. Ultimately, you end up seeing jobs and businesses thriving in response to the regulation that’s been put there.

    Now, that’s one way to regulate, is just to tell people you got to produce more energy-efficient cars. Another way of doing it is just to send a price signal. You say, it’s going to be more expensive for you if you’ve got a less fuel-efficient car.

    Well, that’s the only idea that we’re trying to talk about when it comes to these greenhouse gases that are causing global warming. If we say that, you know what, the pollution that’s being sent into the atmosphere has a cost to all of us — in terms of in some cases the air we breathe that’s causing asthma, in some cases because it’s causing climate change — we just want you to take into account those costs and price energy accordingly. And that means that things like wind energy suddenly become more appealing because they don’t produce those pollution — those pollutants, and other sources of energy become less appealing because they do produce those pollutants.

    The idea has been that if we put a price on these carbons, then maybe that would be a way that companies would all respond and start inventing new things that would make our planet cleaner. That’s the whole idea.

    Now, last point I’m going to make on this. What is true is that a lot of us depend on dirty sources of energy and a lot of us depend on really inefficient cars and buildings and et cetera. And so there’s got to be a transition. We’re not going to suddenly get all our energy from wind or all our energy from sun because we just don’t have the technology to do it.

    But what we should be doing is planning over the next 20, 30 years to move in that direction. That’s what countries like China are doing. That’s what countries like France are doing. That’s what countries all across Europe are doing, and all across Asia are doing. We don’t want to be left behind. We’re the only ones who have kind of missed the boat. So we’re still using 20th century technologies and everybody else is producing 21st century technologies.

    Look what happened with the car. We started getting our clock cleaned when consumers decided they wanted a cleaner car and suddenly everybody was buying their cars from Japan, or now South Korea. And we want to make sure that that doesn’t happen when it comes to wind turbines, it doesn’t happen when it comes to solar energy, et cetera.

    So the ideas that are being talked about is how do we provide more incentive for clean energy companies like yours to operate profitably, and over time how do we start shifting away from less efficient ways of using energy? That’s a pretty straightforward thing to do. There’s nothing radical about it.

    It is true, though, that it’s not going to happen overnight; it’s going to take some time. And we’re still going to be getting our electricity from coal; we’re still going to be getting electricity from nuclear energy; we’re still going to be getting electricity and power from natural gas and other traditional sources. We just want to make sure that we’re also moving into the future even as we do so. And I think that we can. (Applause.)

    All right. I think I’ve got time for one more question. All right, this is the last question. Last question. It’s a lady’s turn. All right, everybody is pointing at her. Right up there, right there. I couldn’t call on anybody. You know I love everybody here.

    Q Good morning, Mr. President. My name is Terry Wright (phonetic) — and I teach math right here at Green Valley High School. (Applause.)

    THE PRESIDENT: Excellent.

    Q And my mom is right behind you in the top row.

    THE PRESIDENT: Where is Mom? Mom, raise your hand.

    Q Right there.

    THE PRESIDENT: Oh, hey, Mom. (Laughter.) You’re a very young looking mom.

    Q Thank you. My question is this — and I’m speaking on behalf of all of us math teachers up here — when you were a freshman in high school specifically, did you have math homework every night? And if you did, did you do it? (Laughter.)

    THE PRESIDENT: Oh, ah. (Laughter.) The answer is yes, and sometimes. (Laughter.) But, first of all, let me thank you for being a math teacher, because we need more math teachers. (Applause.) We need more science teachers. We need more teachers generally who are enthusiastic about their work and their jobs. So thanks to all the teachers here. We love teachers. (Applause.)

    All right. Now, we are actually — unfortunately, our students are falling behind in math and science, internationally. We used to rank at the top, and now we’re sort of in the middle of the pack when it comes to math and science performance.

    This is why one of the things that I’ve been emphasizing this year — and this actually hasn’t been subject to a lot of controversy; this is an area where we’ve been able to get good cooperation between Democrats and Republicans — is promoting math and science education, promoting technology education. The more that we are moving our young people into these areas, the better off this economy is going to be, because that means we’re producing engineers, we’re producing scientists, we’re producing computer programmers.

    So we want to make sure that we are recruiting more math teachers, we’re recruiting more science teachers. We want all outstanding teachers to be getting higher pay. (Applause.) We want to make sure that there’s constant professional development when it comes to the teaching profession, so that if you had the best way of teaching math five years ago, it might not be the best way of teaching math five years from now, and so you should be able to go back and constantly sharpen your skills.

    To the students I want to say this. We’re doing a lot of work on education reform. We are doing a lot to bring in new teachers, to improve classrooms, to make sure that they’re all connected to the Internet, to make sure that college is more affordable. (Applause.) But let me just say that it won’t make any difference if our students aren’t working a little bit harder. (Applause.)

    Now, I’m not saying all of you aren’t working hard. I’m sure many of you feel like you are working very, very hard — because Malia and Sasha always tell me how hard they’re working. (Laughter.) But I really do think that we’re going to have to emphasize in the next decade that we’re competing around the world, and America will continue to be number one as long as we are just as hungry as other countries.

    So if our kids are spending all their time playing video games, and somebody else’s kids are getting the math and science skills to invent video games — (laughter) — we’re not going to be number one. I mean, it’s as simple as that.

    So the need to turn off the TV, put the video games away, buckle down on your work, making sure that parents are checking their kids’ homework and talking to their teachers — (applause) — being accountable, being responsible — that’s what’s going to make sure that we continue to thrive, we continue to excel into the future.

    Thank you, Henderson. I had a great time. Bye-bye. (Applause.)

    END
    11:09 A.M. PST

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • Remarks by the President to the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce and The Las Vegas Conve

    02.19.10 01:54 PM

    12:02 P.M. PST

    THE PRESIDENT: Hello, everybody. Thank you. (Applause.) Thank you so much. Thank you. Everybody, please have a seat. Thank you very much. Thank you.

    Well, what a extraordinary introduction from an extraordinary leader. I just want to reiterate something I said at the town hall meeting earlier. You could not have a better fighter on behalf of the people of Nevada than Senator Harry Reid. (Applause.) And I am just proud — I’m proud to call him a friend.

    A lot of people in Washington forget where they come from. Harry Reid has not. And that’s something that I’ve always admired about Harry, ever since I first got to the Senate. He retains that honesty and decency and homespun good sense and, yes, sometimes some bluntness, that he’s carried with him since his boyhood in Searchlight.

    We’ve got a number of other special guests that I just want to acknowledge. First of all, I want to thank Jim for helping to organize this. Thank you so much to Jim Murren. I want to acknowledge Congresswoman Shelley Berkley and Congresswoman Dina Titus, who are here. (Applause.) Assemblyman Joe Hogan is here and state Senator David Parks. (Applause.) I want to thank the Las Vegas Asian, Henderson, Latin, North Las Vegas, and Urban Chambers. (Applause.) Thank you, guys, for helping to organize this. And the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority. (Applause.)

    You know, I was mentioning the fact that Harry has retained that sense of who he is, despite the extraordinary journey that he’s traveled. Over the past year under very trying circumstances for the country, I’ve seen something else in Harry. Harry comes across as soft-spoken, but he’s made of very strong stuff. He’s never been afraid to make tough decisions, even if they weren’t politically popular, if they were the right decisions for his state and the right decisions for America.

    And so I just want to reiterate his leadership has made a tremendous difference, and through these economic storms he’s never lost sight of the struggles and the hardships of the people who sent him to Washington. And every Nevadan should know the strength and the character of a man that I hope and expect to serve in Washington for many years to come. (Applause.)

    So, thank you, Harry, for the great work you do. Harry also gets embarrassed when you compliment him too much. You know, he kind of — (laughter) — see, he looks away. (Laughter.)

    Now, before I go any further, let me set the record straight: I love Vegas! (Applause.) There you go. Always have. Love Vegas. (Laughter.) Enjoy myself every time I’ve gotten an opportunity to visit. In fact, just last night, I drew a flush on the river and cut the budget deficit in half. (Laughter.) Some of you know I can play some poker. (Laughter.)

    Now, I did receive a little bit of heat, I know, from maybe some in this room, when I said that folks shouldn’t blow their college savings in Vegas. That doesn’t mean I don’t love Vegas. It wasn’t meant to be a shot. I think everybody here would agree that the only place where people should spend their college savings is in college. (Applause.) There’s no contradiction there.

    But, look, I understand how hard things have been here. In the worst economic turmoil that we’ve faced in generations, Las Vegas has been at the eye of the storm. When the economy suffers, the tourism industry is deeply affected; in fact, you’ve seen perhaps the steepest drop in tourism in the state’s history. And I know things are starting to bounce back, but it’s been tough going. When folks are hurting and don’t have the money to spend on a night out or a weekend getaway, that hurts the broader economy as well. So what happens in Vegas reflects what’s happening across America.

    And this area has also been hit by the home mortgage crisis as hard as just about anywhere in America. And this doesn’t just affect the families at risk of losing their homes, as devastating as that can be. It also affects the many more families who’ve lost value in their homes, and the equity that makes it possible to finance a business or secure a retirement. From their peak, home prices in Las Vegas have fallen in half. This is something all of you are aware of.

    And finally, Nevada has not escaped the wider devastation that’s ripped through the financial markets and the economic fabric of our country a whole, as credit became scarce and consumer spending dropped and businesses were forced to close their doors.

    Today, more than one in eight people in Las Vegas can’t find work. So no one needs to explain to the members of the Las Vegas Chamber of Commerce that we’ve been through a punishing recession — as bad as anything since 1930. The recession in 1980-’81, doesn’t come close to what we’ve gone through over the last two years.

    And no one needs to tell you how important it is that we remain absolutely focused on bringing about a strong recovery. Our great challenge as a country is to create the environment in which businesses can expand and hire workers; in which middle-class families can find good jobs and save for the future; in which our economy is growing, and that growth is sustained and broadly shared. That’s my focus; that’s Harry Reid’s focus: to not only rebuild this economy, but to rebuild it stronger than it was before the crisis.

    At the same time, standing before this group of business leaders, it’s important to emphasize that there’s only so much that government can do — and only so much that government should do. Sometimes in Washington it sounds a little contradictory when I hear folks say, "Obama wants the government to take over the economy." Then they’ll turn around and say, "Why isn’t the government doing more to create jobs?"

    Now, Harry and I understand that’s politics. But putting politics aside, what I believe — and what I know you believe — is that the true engine of job creation and economic expansion in this country has never been found in the halls of Congress or in the corridors of the White House. America’s economic success begins elsewhere, in more humble settings: in garages and basements and rented storefronts.

    It begins when a worker decides to leave her job to be her own boss; when an inventor makes his first sale on the way to his first million; when an innovator sees a product that could be better or a service that could be provided more smartly; when an entrepreneur takes a chance on an idea that just might fail, but might also change the world.

    Now, that’s the story of America — the land of opportunity. A nation where — at our best — we welcomed all those from around the world who are willing to work hard, all who are willing to take themselves as far as their talents would allow. And what has made it possible to harness the incredible productive capacity of the American people — the greatest economic force in the history of the world — has been a free market where people can pursue their dreams, their goals and their happiness, and where you can take charge of your own destiny.

    So I don’t believe my role as President, the role of the federal government or the state government or city governments, is to stifle the free market. I think my role is to strengthen its ability to unleash that creativity and ingenuity which still makes this nation the envy of the world.

    Now, there are those who suggest that the only way government can promote strong markets is to allow them to operate wholly outside even the most modest rules of the road, even the most sensible reforms. Many of these same folks also suggest — whether in regard to proposed consumer protections in the health insurance industry, or proposed rules to prevent another financial crisis — that these kinds of policies run counter to our economic interests. And while I respect those who sincerely hold this view, the facts — and our history — do not favor this argument.

    Throughout our past, there have been times when markets have fallen out of balance. And there have been periods of economic transformation and upheaval when prosperity and even basic financial security have eluded far too many citizens. And at those moments, government has stepped in not to supplant private enterprise, but to catalyze it — to create the conditions for entrepreneurs and new businesses to adapt and ultimately to thrive.

    Sometimes it requires government investment. That’s why we laid railroads and highways to spur commerce and industry and stitch this nation together. Sometimes it means making sure that there’s a safety net. That’s why we created Social Security while putting in place financial safeguards like the FDIC in the wake of the economic dislocations of the 1930s.

    A lot of times it involves investing in our people. That’s why we passed a GI bill to nurture the skills and talents of an entire generation. That’s why President Kennedy pointed us to the moon, knowing that the exploration of the skies above would lead to unimagined discoveries here on Earth.

    That’s how Las Vegas became Las Vegas — a balance of private enterprise but also a regulatory structure that made sure that people could come here and enjoy themselves and thrive and bring their families in an environment that was safe for them and secure.

    At these moments of transformation, such efforts by government, they don’t stifle our economy; just the opposite. They’ve helped our economy achieve the growth that was not only more robust, but more widely shared by our citizens — citizens who were in turn better able to contribute to our economy. And when we’ve gone without sound rules of the road and sound investments in our future, then we’ve risked stagnation or worse — we’ve risked full-blown economic crises.

    And that’s where we found ourselves one year ago when my administration came through the door. I know sometimes we’ve got a short-term memory. It’s one of the things that makes America great, is we don’t brood about the past. But it’s worth us just remembering where we were.

    Five trillion dollars of Americans’ household wealth evaporated in just 12 weeks as the financial markets plummeted — $5 trillion. Several of the world’s largest financial institutions were on the brink of collapse; some of them disappeared. Home values were in freefall — nobody knew what the floor was. Businesses could not get credit, no matter how creditworthy. Seven hundred and fifty thousand jobs were vanishing each month — more than the entire population of Vermont was losing its job every single month when I was sworn in. And the fear among economists across the political spectrum was that we were rapidly sinking into a second Great Depression.

    So we undertook a series of difficult steps — and, frankly, some of them were unpopular, deeply unpopular — to prevent that outcome. And I was at the town hall earlier today and I pointed out, it’s not as if Harry and I don’t have pollsters — we got very good pollsters, and they tell us when things are unpopular.n (Laughter.) "Don’t do that!" But we thought it was important to do what was right, not what was popular. (Applause.)

    So we acted to get lending flowing again, so companies like yours could get loans to buy equipment and restock, keep your doors open, make payroll. We thought it was important for ordinary Americans to be able to finance their homes, or buying a new car, or going to college, or starting or running a business.

    We passed tax relief for small businesses and 95 percent of working families, for college students, for first-time homebuyers. We extended or increased unemployment benefits not just to help those families but also to make sure that there was some demand in the economy at a time when so much demand had been lost. We made health insurance 65 percent cheaper for families relying on COBRA. We acted to close state budget gaps to prevent hundreds of thousands of teachers and public school workers and firefighters and police officers from being laid off all across the country, including right here in Nevada.

    And at the same time, we initiated investments to spur hiring while laying a foundation for long-term lasting growth. We doubled our capacity in renewable energy like wind and solar. We computerized medical records to save money and lives. We provided the largest boost to medical research in history. All across the country, classrooms and school laboratories are being renovated. Roads and railways are being upgraded as part of the largest investment in infrastructure since President Eisenhower half a century ago initiated the Interstate Highway System.

    Right here in Nevada, hundreds of entrepreneurs have received small business loans. One million Nevadans have seen a tax cut. Hundreds of thousands of seniors and veterans have received emergency assistance. A quarter-million people in this state have received additional unemployment insurance. And across Nevada, there are dozens of transportation projects and energy projects and construction projects putting people to work doing the work that America needs done.

    And you know what — what made all this possible was the Recovery Act; also known as the stimulus bill. Now, there are a bunch of folks out there who would tell you otherwise and would say that the Recovery Act hasn’t made a difference and created a job. But, you know, facts are stubborn things. There’s a famous story about a former senator, Daniel Patrick Moynihan, who has having an argument with a fellow senator and the other guy wasn’t doing too well in the argument so finally he said, "Well, I’m entitled to my own opinion." And Moynihan said, "Yes, you’re entitled to your own opinion; you’re not entitled to your own facts." (Laughter.)

    Economists tell us that the Recovery Act has helped stop the freefall in our economy and created or saved as many as two million jobs so far. And by the way the actions of these critics speak louder than words, because many of the members of Congress who voted against the Recovery Act, called it a boondoggle — funny how they end up making appearances at ribbon cuttings for Recovery Act projects. (Laughter.) It’s a sight to see. They’re up there cheesing and grinning. (Laughter.) They’re trying to vote against their cake and eat it, too. (Laughter.)

    Now, this is not to say that all of our troubles are over — far from it. We may have kept 2 million people from the unemployment line in this recession, but more than 8 million people have lost their jobs. We may have broken the back of the recession — when I came in this economy was contracting 6 percent; this past quarter it was growing 6 percent — a huge reversal. So the economy may be growing again, but that growth has not nearly made up for the terrible pain and dislocations that rocked businesses and families over the course of a very difficult two years.

    So we’ve got a lot of work to do. And I’m here to tell you, I will not rest — I know Harry will not rest — until we’re not just recovering, but we’re prospering. I don’t want Vegas just to be getting by — I want Vegas to be thriving. And I know that’s what you want as well. (Applause.)

    So that’s why Harry and I are working to provide tax breaks for small businesses to spur hiring. That’s why we’re fighting for health insurance reforms to address the crushing cost of health insurance for small businesses and families. And that’s why we’ve continued to seek ways to address the home mortgage crisis, which has touched all parts of this country, but has hit Las Vegas particularly hard.

    In large part, the broader economic crisis we’ve experienced began as a home mortgage crisis. And the story is familiar to all of you. A lot of people got in over their heads, from homeowners on Main Street to large firms on Wall Street. And many more Americans found themselves in a terrible situation by no fault of their own: unable to pay a mortgage because of a lost job, but they’re unable to sell or refinance because their mortgage debt is now higher than the value of their house — their home is underwater.

    Now, government has a responsibility to help deal with this problem. I’ve got to again repeat — government can’t stop every foreclosure. There’s not enough money in the Treasury to stop every foreclosure. And we shouldn’t be using tax dollars to reward the same irresponsible lenders or borrowers who helped precipitate the crisis. But what government can do — what government can do is to help responsible homeowners to stay in their homes. The government can stop preventable foreclosures. What we can do is stabilize the housing market so home values can begin to rise again.

    So over the course of the past year, we’ve taken a number of steps to do just that. We’ve provided a tax credit for 1.4 million taxpayers to help them buy their first homes. We’ve made it possible for more than one million struggling homeowners to reduce monthly payments. And combined with our broader efforts to spur growth, stem job losses, and stabilize the financial system, we’ve helped promote recovery in the housing markets. In fact, in many markets, home values have begun to rebound.

    But we got a ways to go, especially in the hardest hit regions like Las Vegas, where there are just too many blocks littered with brown lawns and "for sale" signs, too many mortgage holders are underwater, and where job losses continue to exact a terrible toll. So for these communities, recovery depends on continued responsible efforts to stop the downward spiral of defaults, foreclosures, and declining home values.

    That’s why earlier today I announced a $1.5 billion investment in housing finance agencies in the states hardest hit by this housing crisis. And one of those states is Nevada. (Applause.) So that means that here in Nevada, we’re going to be able to help prevent some foreclosures that otherwise would have happened. It’s going to allow lenders to help homeowners who are underwater. And it will help folks who’ve taken out a second mortgage modify their loans.

    So the goal is to target communities at the center of the crisis, and to empower local agencies who know these communities best to structure and tailor their programs in ways that are most responsive.

    Now, these are very difficult times for our country — times that demand we put aside the stale debates and the tired arguments, times that demand of us something more. The fact is, the economic crisis of the past two years — indeed the growing economic insecurity of the middle class that’s been going for a decade — was born not just of failures in our economic system. These challenges were also born of failures in our political system.

    And while Harry has been fighting for us, too many folks in Washington have been putting off hard decisions. So for decades, we’ve watched as efforts to solve tough problems fall prey to gamesmanship and partisanship, to the prosaic concerns of politics, the ever-quickening news cycle, to endless campaigns focused on scoring points instead of meeting our common challenges.

    Imagine if you had to run a business like this, where the people who are in your office are constantly yelling at you, running ads against you, more interested inyou failing than the company succeeding. That’s what we’ve been seeing in Washington.

    And it’s got to stop, because the challenges have been mounting all around us. A health care system that saddles businesses and families with skyrocketing costs. An economy powered by fuels — are fuels of the 20th century instead of the 21st, and endanger our planet and our security. We’ve got an education system unsuited for a global era, and a financial system that has been rewarding reckless risks. And we’ve got a structural deficit that threatens to leave our children a mountain of debt.

    So we’ve seen the consequences of this failure of responsibility, and the American people have paid a heavy price. The question we’ll have to answer now is if we’re going to learn from the past or if, even in the aftermath of disaster, we’re going to repeat it. Because as the alarm bells fade, and the din of Washington rises, the danger is we just forget what happened and we start thinking we should go back to business as usual. That won’t work. It will not work in this global economy, not in this environment.

    I said this during the State of the Union. I repeated it today in Henderson in my town hall. Other countries are not playing for second — they’re playing for first. One of the things that I know is of great interest to Nevada is tourism and what are we doing for tourism promotion. I can tell you, Harry is going to be championing a tourism promotion bill because, as he points out, why is it that every other country is promoting their tourist industry and America is not doing enough for ours? (Applause.)

    But that’s just — he’s going to have strong support for that effort, but that’s just one example of the competition that we’re facing on everything. If China is producing 40 high-speed rail lines and we’re producing one, we’re not going to have the infrastructure of the future. If India or South Korea are producing more scientists and engineers than we are, we will not succeed.

    So I hope that all of us — Democrats, Republicans, public servants, and leaders in the business community — can keep alive a sense of seriousness, a sense of common purpose. That’s how we can rise to this moment and transcend the failures of the past, tackle the challenges before us, and leave behind a nation that is more prosperous than ever before.

    But it is going to take work and I am going to need all of you to be partners with Harry and partners with myself in moving it forward. The days are over where we can keep on organizing ourselves along the lines of, business is here and labor is here and government is over here. We are all in this together. (Applause.)

    If businesses — and nobody understands that more than Las Vegas. If the MGM is doing well, that means its workers are doing well. And if its workers are doing well, that means that the housing market is doing well. And if the housing market is doing well, then that means that small businesses all across the region are doing well, who in turn are hiring more workers.

    That’s the model that we’ve got to achieve. But it also means in order for us to succeed, it also means that business, labor, government, Democrats, Republicans — we can’t be looking for every single edge or advantage on every single issue. At some points, we’ve got to be thinking about the larger good.

    So if we’re serious about reforming the health care system, we’ve got to be thinking, even if I’ve got health insurance — and by the way I’ve got really good health insurance — (laughter) — I’ve got a doctor who follows me around everywhere — (laughter) — I’ve got to spend some time thinking about the people who don’t have health insurance.

    And I’ve also got to be thinking about the next generation that’s picking up the bill for the health insurance that’s currently being provided to me if I’m getting a benefit from the government. If I’m a business leader, I’ve got to be thinking about my shareholders and my bottom line, but I’ve also got to be thinking about the people who work for me and I’ve got to be thinking about the larger community and I’ve got to be thinking about the country.

    That kind of leadership can’t just come from the White House, it can’t just come from the United States Senate — it’s got to come from you. In fact, that’s where it always comes from in America. The most profound changes, the most dynamic innovations, they don’t happen from the top down — they happen from the bottom up.

    But they always happen not just because of some single individual with some great idea — although a lot of times that’s what drives innovation in our economy. It also comes from a culture of trust and mutual regard. America has always been a combination of fierce individualism, but also a sense of community, the sense that we’re looking out for one another.

    And every single successful business leader here understands that’s the kind of culture you’ve tried to build in your businesses. That’s the kind of culture we have to reinvigorate all across America. I’m confident we can do so. I am looking forward to coming back to Vegas. I think my mother-in-law is going to get here first. (Laughter.) She comes quite frequently — maybe I shouldn’t say that in front of the press. (Laughter.)

    But I want everybody here to have confidence that if we keep on working hard, we don’t shy away from these tough challenges, and we’re not looking backwards, we’re looking forwards, then not only is Las Vegas going to thrive in the 21st century, not only is Nevada going to thrive in the 21st century, but all the United States of America is going to thrive.

    Thank you very much, everybody. God bless you, and God bless America. (Applause.)

    END
    12:32 P.M. PST

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • Remarks by the First Lady at Fresh Food Financing Initiative

    02.19.10 02:30 PM

    2:47 P.M. EST

    MRS. OBAMA: Thank you. All right, Albalee, that applause was just as much for me as it was for your wonderful introduction. (Laughter.) Wasn’t she? She did a great job, great job. (Applause.) Just know that we’re all very proud of you, and we’re all very proud of every single one of your classmates and every single student here in the city of Philadelphia and the state of Pennsylvania. I am so pleased to be here today, so grateful. And thank you all for having me.

    Ever since July, when Secretary Vilsack stopped — visited here, he has not stopped talking — (laughter) — about his visit here to Pennsylvania. (Applause.) No, really, I mean — and when I heard about it I couldn’t wait to get here. As we’ve been talking about the garden and talking about this initiative, I’m like, I got to see what’s going on in Philly, what’s going on in Pennsylvania. So I’m thrilled to finally have the chance to come here and see for myself, and I want to thank Secretary Vilsack not just for being out front on this issue but for his leadership and work at the U.S. Department of Agriculture.

    I also want to thank Secretary Geithner also for joining us today. Both of them have just been terrific resources and support, not just in the Cabinet but just in everything that we’re doing.

    And I don’t think that many Treasury Secretaries can claim childhood obesity as part of their portfolio, right? (Laughter and applause.) It is pretty cool to have your husband’s Treasury Secretary enthusiastically a part of this initiative. (Laughter.) So I salute you for your work. I know your wife has a lot to do with it, but that’s — (laughter.)

    I also want to thank Senators Casey and Carper as well for being here; Representatives Brady and Fattah –I’m trying to make sure I’m catching everybody. And Representative Schwartz for joining us today and for their work on behalf of the people of this state and for the people of Delaware.

    I want to thank Governor Rendell, Mr. Svelte — (laughter) — looking good, who’s here. Every time I see him he gets smaller and smaller. (Laughter.) It’s a good thing. You’re looking good. And I also want to thank his wonderful wife, Judge Marjorie Rendell. I’m going to see you all very shortly tomorrow at the National Governors Association. Have to thank Mayor Nutter, who still is getting the award for one of the best campaign rallies we had here in Philly. He just blew out the introduction, had everybody crying. (Laughter.) So thank you for your support and your leadership here. Representative Evans, thank you for your outstanding work to ensure that the kids across this state can lead active, healthy lives. The work that you’ve done to get this going has been tremendous. (Applause.) Yeah, stand up!

    And I also have to recognize Pat Burns, who hosted us at the Fresh Grocer today. (Applause.) Pat hosted us, just as Jeff Brown hosted Secretary Vilsack and others at his supermarket last summer. It was just wonderful tour, a wonderful experience, and I commend both of you for your leadership and for doing what’s best for the people of this city.

    And I have to finally thank a few others: the Food Trust. (Applause.) The Reinvestment Fund. (Applause.) And the Greater Philadelphia Urban Affairs Coalition. (Applause.) You all have done extraordinary and some could say revolutionary work here in this city. And as you all have said consistently, you couldn’t do it without each other. That has been the resonating message. So you all should be very proud to be highlighted here today for the work that you’ve done. It’s really groundbreaking, and hopefully will set the tone for what we can do throughout the country.

    Six years ago, when this city had fewer supermarkets per person than almost anywhere in America, all right, that was six years ago, when many folks had no access to healthy foods; six years ago many neighborhoods had alarming rates of obesity-related conditions like heart disease and diabetes — the folks in this city, you all could have decided that you had an unsolvable problems on your hands, right? You could have done that. You could have decided that these problems were just too big and too complicated and too entrenched and thrown your hands up and walked away.

    But instead you all took a stand, a really important, collaborative stand. You decided first that no family in this city should be spending a fortune on high-priced, low-quality foods because they have no other options. You decided that no child should be consigned to a life of poor health because of what neighborhood his or her family lives in. And you decided that you weren’t going to just talk about the problem or wring your hands about the problems, but you were going to act.

    And that’s precisely the kind of determination, the kind of commitment that we need to address the epidemic of childhood obesity in this country. And this issue is an issue of great concern to me, and I’ve said this before, not because I’m First Lady — or not just because I’m First Lady of this country — but because I’m a mother, and I care about my kids and I care about all of our kids. And I know that this issue is a great concern to all of you, everyone around this country. We all care about our kids. That’s why last week we enthusiastically and proudly launched "Let’s Move." (Applause.) "Let’s Move" is a nationwide campaign to rally this country around one single but ambitious goal, and that is to end the epidemic of childhood obesity in a generation so that the kids born today grow up with a healthy weight. Simple but ambitious.

    So this is what we need to do. Let’s move to help families and communities make healthier decisions for their kids. Let’s move to bring together our governors and our mayors, our doctors, our nurses, our businesses, our community groups, our parents, teachers, coaches, everyone to tackle this challenge once and for all. And let’s move to get our kids what they need to succeed in life. Let’s move to ensure that they have the energy and the strength to succeed in school and then in the careers that they choose. Let’s move to ensure that they can later live lives where they can keep up with their own kids, maybe keep up with their own grandkids, and if they’re blessed, maybe their great-grandkids.

    And "Let’s Move" is a simple initiative with four parts. And Albalee very well laid them out. (Laughter.) Good job. (Applause.) But let me repeat: First part, let’s move to give parents the tools and the information they need to make the healthy choices for their kids. So we’re working to provide better labeling for our food and encourage our pediatricians to screen kids for obesity during well-child visits, but then to write a prescription for families when they identify a problem with a step-by-step sort of process for what they can actually do. And we started this wonderful Web site called letsmove.gov to help provide tips and step-by-step strategies on eating well and staying active so parents don’t feel alone and isolated as they’re trying to figure this out.

    Second part: Let’s move to get more nutritious food in our schools. Secretary Vilsack, that’s something he’s focused on. That’s why we’re working not just with the Department of Agriculture but with food suppliers, food service workers, school officials, and investing billions of dollars to revamp our school breakfast and lunch programs so that our kids are eating foods with less sugar, fat, and salt, and eating more foods with fresh vegetables and fruits and whole grains. (Applause.)

    The third part of the initiative is: Let’s move. That’s literally let’s move. We got to move. We got to find ways for our kids to be more active, both in and out of school. That’s why we’re expanding and modernizing the President’s Physical Fitness Challenge. And we’ve recruited professional athletes from all across this country who are just ready and willing to encourage our kids to get and to stay active.

    And then finally, one of the reasons why we’re here, the final component: Let’s move to ensure that all families have access to healthy, affordable food in their own communities. (Applause.) And the approach on this aspect is very simple. We want to replicate your success here in Pennsylvania all across America.

    Again, six years ago this state decided to invest $30 million in fresh food financing, which has leveraged $190 million more from the private and non-profit sectors. And so far these investments have funded 83 supermarket projects in 34 counties, bringing nutritious food to more than 400,000 people. (Applause.) And, more importantly in this economy, this investment is projected to create more than 5,000 jobs. (Applause.) And these jobs are occurring often in communities that need them the most. Across this state, right now, because of these efforts, new employees are learning new job skills. And I met many of them at the Fresh Grocer. Just folks who were proud — proud to be in a store that was serving their community and proud to be doing a good job and have a chance to not just support their families but do something good for the rest of their communities. (Applause.)

    But these new stores are also bringing new economic development into these communities, because they serve as anchors to attract other businesses to invest, and creating even more new jobs. So one good deed leads to another.

    And we saw this example today again during our visit to the Fresh Grocer at Progress Plaza. As you all know, the last supermarket that was in that community closed more than 10 years ago. More than a decade ago. That was the last time that that community had a grocery store. So this community went 10 years without a place for folks to buy good food. For 10 years folks had to buy their groceries at places like convenience stores and gas stations, where usually they don’t have a whole lot of fresh food, if any, to choose from. So that means if a mom wanted to buy a head of lettuce to make a salad in this community, or have some fresh fruit for their kids’ lunch, that means she would have to get on a bus, navigate public transportation with big bags of groceries, probably more than one time a week, or, worse yet, pay for a taxicab ride to get to some other supermarket in another community, just to feed her kids.

    So let’s think about that. For 10 years in one community, there were kids in that community who couldn’t get the nutritious food that they needed during some of the most formative years of their lives. And think about the impact that that can have on a child’s health, not just now but in the future, because research shows that children who are overweight as adolescents are 70 to 80 percent more likely to become obese as adults.

    And what happened in the neighborhood that we visited today is happening somewhere in every state all across this country. Right now there are 23.5 million Americans, including 6.5 million children, who live in what we call "food deserts." These are places and communities that don’t have a supermarket. This is true in the inner city and in rural communities. This is happening all across the country.

    But fortunately, right here in Philadelphia, you all have this wonderful grocer named Pat Burns who had already opened successful stores in other neighborhoods. And he decided that it was — he was interested in opening a grocery store in Progress Plaza. (Applause.) But he could only do it because of a grant from the Fresh Food Financing Initiative. And today, just a few months after it opened — and this is important for everybody to understand — the Fresh Grocer is doing a thriving business. It’s a beautiful store, attracting folks from neighboring communities and providing jobs for folks in the area. In fact, during the big snow the Fresh Grocer was able to stay open because so many of the employees live nearby.

    So with your success here in Pennsylvania, what you’ve shown us is that when we provide the right support and incentives, then business leaders like Pat Burns and Jeff Brown, they’re going to take the chance to invest in our communities. And when we bring fresh, healthy food to communities, what do we learn? People will buy it, right? People will buy it. These stores are turning a profit. And what’s going on is that they’re doing well by doing good. Isn’t that something? (Applause.)

    So it’s because of this example that part of "Let’s Move" we created this Healthy Food Financing Initiative that’s modeled on what’s been going on here. And as Secretary Geithner said, with a modest initial investment of about $400 million a year, we’re going to use that money to leverage hundreds of millions more from private and non-profit sectors to bring grocery stores and other healthy food retailers to underserved communities all across this country. If you can do it here, we can do it around the country. (Applause.) And our goal is ambitious. It’s to eliminate food deserts in America completely in seven years. (Applause.)

    Again, we know this is ambitious, but we also know that tackling the issue of accessibility and affordability is key to achieving the overall goal of solving childhood obesity in this generation. Because we can give our kids the healthiest school breakfasts and lunches imaginable, but that won’t mean much if they head to the corner store after school and buy candy and chips and soda because that’s all they have available, right? And we can create the best nutrition education and physical education programs in the world, but if dinner is something off of the shelf of a local gas station or convenience store because there’s no grocery store nearby, all our best efforts are going to go to waste. We’re setting people up for failure if we don’t fix this.

    So it’s clear that we need a comprehensive, coordinated approach. But we also have to be clear that that doesn’t mean that it requires a bunch of new laws and policies from Washington, D.C. I have spoken to many experts on this issue, and not a single one of them has said that the solution to this problem is to have government telling people what to do in their own lives.

    It’s also not about spending huge sums of money, particularly during these times, when so many communities are already stretched thin. Instead, it’s about doing more with what we already have.

    And as you’ve shown us here in Philadelphia, it’s about smart investments that leverage more investments and then have the potential to pay for themselves many times over in the long run. What you’ve clearly demonstrated here in this city and in this state is that we can do what’s good for our businesses and our economy while doing what’s good for our kids and our families and our neighborhoods at the same time. We can do it all. (Applause.)

    And Jeff Brown put it best when he talked about his decision to put a grocery store in underserved communities. He said, "We have more than the bottom" — "We have more than one bottom line here." That’s important. He said, "We have more than one bottom line here…the community’s success is important, too." That’s a wonderful spirit. (Applause.) And in the end, that’s what this is all about, really — not just the kind of food that we want our kids to eat, but it’s also about the kind of communities that we want our kids to live in. And it’s about the kind of lives that we want them to lead, right, all of our kids.

    We know it won’t be easy to solve this obesity crisis, because these big problems are never easy. We’re going to need a lot more folks just like all of you to step up to the plate. This isn’t about the First Lady doing it all. I can’t do it by myself. I’m going to need all of you. We’re going to have to work together. But if there’s anyone out there who doubts that it can be done, then I would urge them to come here to Philadelphia and to see what you’ve done here. (Applause.) I would urge them to see the difference that we can make when government and businesses and community groups and ordinary folks come together to tackle a common problem. It’s a powerful thing. I would urge them to imagine what we can achieve if we take programs like this that have lifted up so many communities here in Pennsylvania and then we bring those programs and those efforts and those ideas to every part of this country. Just imagine how many jobs we can create. Just imagine how many neighborhoods that we could revitalize and how many lives could be transformed. You all are seeing that now.

    So let’s move. (Laughter.) That’s really the point. (Applause.) If we know it can be done, let’s move, let’s get it done. Let’s give our kids everything they need and everything they deserve to be the best that they can be. Thank you all. This has been a wonderful day. Thank you so much. (Applause.)

    END
    3:10 P.M. EST

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • Letter from the President to Congressional Committee Leadership

    02.19.10 12:16 PM

    TEXT OF A LETTER FROM THE PRESIDENT
    TO THE CHAIRMEN AND RANKING MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE AND SENATE COMMITTEES
    ON ARMED SERVICES AND APPROPRIATIONS AND THE CHAIRMEN AND
    RANKING MEMBERS OF THE HOUSE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN AFFAIRS
    AND THE SENATE COMMITTEE ON FOREIGN RELATIONS

    February 18, 2010

    Dear Mr. Chairman: (Dear Representative:) (Dear Senator:) In response to the requirement of section 1116 of the Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2009 (Public Law 111-32), and in order to keep the Congress fully informed, I provide the attached report related to Afghanistan and Pakistan.

    My Administration completed a thorough policy review last November, and I announced a new approach at West Point on December 1. We are now in the early weeks of implementing this policy and therefore do not believe further adjustments are required at this time.

    I assure you of my Administration’s commitment to the successful implementation of this policy.

    Sincerely,
    BARACK OBAMA

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • Remarks by the President at Grassroots Fundraiser for Senator Bennet

    02.18.10 05:18 PM

    3:50 P.M. MST

    THE PRESIDENT: Hello, Denver! (Applause.) I’m fired up! (Applause.) What a great crowd. (Applause.) Yes, we can.

    AUDIENCE: Yes, we can! Yes, we can! Yes, we can! Yes, we can!

    THE PRESIDENT: Thank you. Thank you, everybody. Listen, let me first of all say I am thrilled to be back in Denver. (Applause.) I’ve got some good friends here who I want to make sure I acknowledge, in addition to the guy standing beside me here.

    First of all, your outstanding governor is in the house, Bill Ritter. Where is Bill? (Applause.) There he is. (Applause.) Lieutenant Governor Barbara O’Brien is here. (Applause.) A great partner for this guy, Senator Mark Udall is in the house. (Applause.) Congressman Jared Polis is here. (Applause.) And an outstanding mayor, who I think actually might make a pretty good governor, John Hickenlooper in the house. (Applause.)

    It is great to be back in Colorado.

    AUDIENCE MEMBER: We love you!

    THE PRESIDENT: I love you back. (Laughter.) I know this state is the training ground for a few Winter Olympians — (applause) — who are doing us so proud. I know Shaun White’s secret training facility up on Silverton Mountain paid off. I don’t know how those guys do that, though. (Laughter.) How do you start doing that? (Laughter.)

    AUDIENCE MEMBER: Practice!

    THE PRESIDENT: But how do you get up the guts the first time to start practicing doing that? (Laughter.)

    Gold medal for snowboarding — Colorado is the home of several Olympians, including Lindsey Vonn — (applause) — who brought home the gold yesterday; Johnny Spillane, who won the silver medal in Nordic combined — first American medal in that event. So I just want all of our Olympians to know that the United States of America is proud of you, we are cheering for you every day. I am checking my BlackBerry — (laughter) — every half hour to see how things turned out.

    I’ve got some good memories of Denver, including one just down the road at Mile High Stadium. (Applause.) Some of you may have been there. You know, that night I talked about the promise of America. And I want you to know that not a single day goes by that I don’t think about the obligation that I have to keep that promise alive for every single American and every single Coloradoan.

    AUDIENCE MEMBER: Thank you!

    THE PRESIDENT: You’re welcome. (Laughter.) Thank you for giving me the privilege of every single day thinking about how can we make that American Dream live for everybody, not just for some.

    And I’m thrilled to be here in support of a leader who shares our commitment to that priority — Senator Michael Bennet. (Applause.)

    Now, some of you may support him just because he’s got an adorable family. (Laughter.) They are adorable. But for those of you who need additional reasons, let me testify about this guy. He’s been an agent of change in these parts for a very long time. As a businessman, he turned struggling companies around and got them to work better. He knows how to make the private sector work. Then, he put his talents to use making Denver work better. And Mayor John Hickenlooper, one of America’s finest mayors — (applause) — soon to be one of America’s best governors, knows how valuable Michael can be.

    Michael closed a budget deficit and balanced two budgets in a row by finding innovative ways to get the job of city government done. Then, he took over the public school system where progress was stalled and budgets were shrinking, and he turned that around, too. (Applause.) He invested in your schools and your classrooms, he expanded early childhood education for your kids, finished with graduation rates up and student achievement climbing faster than in any other district in the state. (Applause.) In just a few short years, Michael proved himself to be one of America’s great education reformers.

    AUDIENCE MEMBER: That’s right.

    THE PRESIDENT: That’s right. (Laughter.) I got an "Amen" over here. (Laughter.)

    So when I heard that he’d be joining your other extraordinary Senator, Mark Udall, I was thrilled because I knew that Michael is a different kind of leader — one who’s unafraid to bring a fresh approach to tough challenges because he knows the old ways of doing business just won’t do. Not anymore. And Colorado, that is precisely the kind of leader that he has been in Washington. That’s precisely the kind of leader he’s going to continue to be when you reelect him as senator from the great state of Colorado. (Applause.)

    Now, keep in mind Michael answered the call to service at an extraordinarily challenging time for Colorado and for America. He took office just over a year ago, two days after I did, and thinking about what we were facing then — a financial crisis unlike any that we had seen in generations; an economy that was bleeding 700,000 jobs a month; a $1.3 trillion deficit; two wars; challenges that ranged from the specter of terrorism to the impacts of globalization; and on top of that, one of the toughest decades America’s middle class has ever faced, with stagnant job growth, declining income, and rising costs.

    So when he was asked to serve, he could have said, "I don’t think so." (Laughter.) "Let me put this off for a while" — and especially when you think about the sacrifice he has to make with respect to a young family. Nobody would have blamed Michael if he had declined the challenge. He could have blinked in the face of these difficulties and shied away from an economy in turmoil. He could have scanned the political landscape and seen the pain and anger that Americans were feelings and said, "You know what, let me just point fingers at somebody else and wait till things got better."

    But that’s not what Michael did, because that’s not his style. He has always thrived in taking on the tough job. And he knew it would be a tough time to serve, but he knew that’s when you can make the greatest difference. He knew that he might take a few licks as a politician — but he also knew it would be nothing compared to the licks that working families all across this state and all across this country have been taking every day. And so he stepped up. And he has been a tremendous ally for middle-class families not just here in this state but all across the country. (Applause.)

    He was here by my side in Denver a year ago, when we signed the Recovery Act into law. (Applause.) It wasn’t a politically easy decision to make — for any of us — because we knew that we were already facing big deficits that had been run up over the last decade. But we had a responsibility to do what was right for the American people, and break the back of this recession that was slipping into a depression.

    One year later, thanks largely to the Recovery Act, we can stand here again and say that a second depression is no longer a possibility. (Applause.) An economy that was shrinking by 6 percent a year ago is now growing by nearly 6 percent. (Applause.) According to independent, nonpartisan economists, there are about 2 million Americans who are at work today who would otherwise be unemployed. (Applause.)

    We cut taxes for 95 percent of working Americans; for small businesses; for first-time homebuyers; for parents trying to care for their kids; for 8 million Americans paying for college, we made it less expensive. (Applause.) We extended and increased unemployment insurance for more than 19 million Americans. We made COBRA 65 percent cheaper for families who have suffered a job lost. We gave relief to states to help them through these tough times. And every governor, Republican and Democrat, will acknowledge that if it hadn’t been for that Recovery Act, we would have seen police officers and firefighters and teachers laid off.

    And we began building the infrastructure, investing not just in roads and bridges, in airports and railways, but in the infrastructure of the future, something that John Hickenlooper knows a lot about, making sure that we’ve got high-speed in this country, making sure that we’ve got broadband lines in this country, making sure that we’re investing in science and technology, and education and clean energy in America that is going to assure long-term growth and prosperity. (Applause.)

    Now, you wouldn’t know any of this if you just listened to those who are trying to score political points by attacking me or attacking Michael or what we did, despite the fact that a lot of these guys, when it comes to the ribbon-cuttings for the projects they show up. (Laughter.) They were holding up those big checks. (Laughter.) "Look what I did for you." You know, I’m not going to give them hell. I’m going to tell the truth, and they’ll think it’s hell. (Applause.) That’s what Harry Truman said. (Applause.)

    But that’s politics as usual. We’ve become accustomed to it. We’ve become numb to it. We’re just accustomed to falsehoods and exaggerations and slash-and-burn politics.

    But Michael and I, we don’t have time for that nonsense. We’re going to keep doing everything in our power to turn this economy around. We won’t rest as long as millions are still without work, or millions are still working harder and harder for less. Until they begin to feel recovery in their own lives, we’re going to keep on working, because for years, Americans just doing their best to live up to their responsibilities have seen their leaders fail to live up to their responsibilities.

    We’ve got a Washington here every day is Election Day. On Wall Street, they’ve seen failure rewarded. In the hallways of both cities, you see lobbyists and special interests using money and connections to stack the deck, and pundits who all they’re interested in is the political game — is the red team winning, is the blue team winning — instead of, are the American people winning. (Applause.)

    And so people are fed up because it’s not a game. It’s not a game. And when I get out and I talk with workers in factories, and families in diners, nobody is asking who’s up, who’s down, what’s the latest poll number look like? No one is asking me, hey, you know, who won the media cycle today? (Laughter.) They’re interested in how are we going to help them find a job when they’ve only known one trade in their whole life; how are they going to send their kids to college; how are they going to pay the bills if they get sick; how are they going to retire when their savings are so beat up; and who, if anybody, is going to confront the real problems that touch their lives?

    That’s why I ran for President. That’s why I was in Mile High Stadium. That’s why Michael Bennet signed up to be your senator. That’s why we are not going to quit. We do not quit — (applause) — because we believe if we’re going to secure a better future for the people of this state and the American people, as Michael so eloquently spoke about, we’re going to have to change the ways of Washington. We’re going to have to solve problems that keep holding us back — and we’ve got no time to waste.

    Now, look, this is a problem that transcends party, what’s happening in Washington right now. A couple weeks ago, I went to the Capitol to speak with Democratic senators. And Michael stood up — and he’s new, so he’s still kind of puzzled as to — (laughter) — why is nothing getting done. (Laughter.) So Michael stood up, he challenged everybody in the room, including me. He said, "This place looks broken to the American people. What can we do differently? What do we need do differently –” (applause) — “Democrats and Republicans — so that democracy can meet the test that we’re facing right now?" That’s what Michael asked me. That’s what the American people are asking.

    Now, the first thing I’ll say is, you’ve got to have more leaders like Michael Bennet — (applause) — because he’s determined to break through partisan gridlock to get the tough stuff done. He’s fearless when it comes to challenging the old assumptions and the tired debates and the entrenched special interests that have stymied progress for too long.

    He told me about a woman he met from Glenwood Springs. She asked him where could she get her lobbyist in Washington. (Laughter.) I don’t know what he told her, but I — if she were here, I would tell her, you don’t need a lobbyist because you’ve got Michael Bennet as senator and you’ve got Mark Udall as senator and they are going to be looking out for your interests. (Applause.)

    The only agenda Michael has is yours. He understands that there’s something more important than pursuing power or clinging on to your seat or scoring points — and that’s breaking free from the politics of the past and moving America forward at this defining moment in our history.

    Look, we can keep on being consumed by the politics of energy, but we know that there are factories to reopen, and assembly lines to restart, and workers ready to build wind turbines and solar panels and advanced batteries right here in the United States of America. We know that whoever leads the clean energy revolution is going to lead the 21st century economy. The people of Colorado understand that. Michael Bennet understands that. (Applause.)

    And we can’t wait. We can’t wait. Because China is not waiting. India is not waiting. Germany is not waiting. We can’t afford to wait.

    AUDIENCE MEMBER: That’s right!

    THE PRESIDENT: Exactly. (Laughter.) We can’t continue to spin our wheels in the old education debates — the stale debates, they pit teachers against reformers — meanwhile kids are trailing their counterparts all around the world.

    So we need to do what Michael did here in Denver, which is to bring people together, get them talking, build consensus around reform. Because we know that the country that out-educates us today is going to out-compete us tomorrow. And we don’t want that future for our young people. We’re not going to sentence them to a lifetime of lower wages and unfulfilled dreams. (Applause.)

    We can continue to ignore the growing burden of runaway health care costs. And we all know what will happen if we do — it’s already happening. Just the other week, one of California’s largest insurers sent a letter to a million customers saying: Your premiums are going to go up by as much as 39 percent.

    AUDIENCE: Boo!

    THE PRESIDENT: It’s not just happening there. It’s happening in Kansas; it’s happening in Missouri; it’s happening in Maine. You name it, across the country, it’s happening — it’s going to be happening here.

    AUDIENCE MEMBER: Already is!

    THE PRESIDENT: Already happened. Now, after folks found out about this rate hike, they caused a ruckus and the insurance company said, well, we’ll put it off for couple months. I’m sure they’re going to work on their PR a little more. (Laughter.)

    The reform before Congress that people like Michael and myself have been working on would help prevent such hikes from happening. And if we walk away from it, we know that premiums and out-of-pocket expenses will keep rising this decade, just as they did in the last decade. More small businesses are going to be priced out of the insurance market. More business — more big businesses are going to be unable to compete internationally. More of you will see health care taking a bigger and bigger bite out of your paychecks. Millions will lose their coverage. Our deficits will keep on growing because health care costs, by far, is the biggest driver of deficits.

    And that’s why we’re not going to walk away from it. (Applause.) That’s why I’ve asked leaders of both parties to come meet with me next week. I want to see what their ideas are, because we know we’ve got ideas that will work for America. (Applause.) And we can’t afford to wait.

    We can keep on playing games with the deficit. But Michael Bennet refuses to. He was a strong supporter of the PAYGO law that says, surprisingly enough, to Congress, you have to pay as you go — a novel concept that helped produce the budget surpluses of the 1990s. If you want to spend on something new, you’ve got to cut back somewhere else. Michael was part of a majority in the Senate that supported the creation of an independent, bipartisan fiscal commission to help us find long-term solutions to some of the problems that we’re facing.

    AUDIENCE MEMBER: Medicare for all!

    THE PRESIDENT: There you go.

    Now, unfortunately, partisanship blocked that step. Some of you read about this, how there were seven people who were co-sponsors of this bill that would create this fiscal commission who, when I decided I was for it, suddenly were against it. (Laughter.) They were sponsors of the bill. So we said, okay, that’s all right, I’ll establish one on my own — National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility — we signed it today — Alan Simpson, a Republican; Erskine Bowles, a Democrat — to find real solutions. (Applause.)

    Michael held an event out here recently where he was talking about fiscal discipline, and his 10 year old daughter, Caroline, came to watch. There she is. Wave. Yes, there she is. (Laughter.) When she was born, America had a surplus. But after two tax cuts, two wars, a prescription drug program, none of which were paid for, we faced a deficit of over $1 trillion and projected deficits of $8 trillion over the next decade. That’s all before my administration spent a single dollar. Then you had the recession. That’s another $3 billion. And then we did have to make sure that we were stimulating the economy, and that cost about a trillion [dollars] — a fraction of the overall debt.

    So that’s we inherited. And as Michael and his daughter walked out of the event — she was listening to all this — I don’t know if you were adding all this up in your head, Caroline, but she said, "Dad, just so you know — I’m not paying for all that." (Laughter and applause.) That’s a smart kid. (Laughter.)

    Her message was crystal clear. The American people did not send us to Washington to argue; they didn’t send us to Washington to obstruct — they sent us there to do what it takes not to win the next election, but to help the next generation. You sent us there to work together; to do what’s right; to solve our problems — once and for all.

    Now, you’ve got a senator right now who goes to work every single day with that mission in mind. And even though Michael Bennet has been serving you for years — believe it or not, this is his first election; he’s a heck of a public servant, but he’s new to politics, do he hasn’t learned the best way to keep your poll numbers up is just to smile and wave and pretend like you’re doing something and not really doing anything that might offend anybody; he hasn’t perfected the seven-second sound bite. He’s never even made a TV ad. Heaven forbid. (Laughter.) And he’s facing reelection in a tough political climate.

    Look, something you got to understand — for those who don’t believe in government, those who don’t believe that we have obligations to each other, it’s a lot easier task. If you can gum up the works, if you make things broken, if the Senate doesn’t get anything done, well, that’s consistent with their philosophy. It’s a whole lot easier to say no to everything. It’s a whole lot easier to blame somebody else. That politics that feeds on peoples’ insecurities, especially during tough political times — that’s the easiest kind of politics. There’s a long, storied history of that kind of politics.

    And so Michael is running in a very tough environment, but he’s got one very powerful advantage. He’s got you. (Applause.) He’s been fighting for each and every one of you in Washington. He needs you to fight for him now. And if you do that, if you’re willing to organize, and make phone calls, and talk to your friends and your neighbors and explain to them what’s at stake; if you come out and caucus for Michael on March 16th, and then fight for him all the way to November; if you help him finish what we’ve started — we’re not just going to move Colorado forward, we’re going to move America forward, and we’re going to guarantee that this century is the American century just like the last one is.

    Let’s get to work, Colorado. God bless you, and God bless the United States of America. (Applause.)

    END
    4:29 P.M. MST

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • Help for the Hardest Hit Housing Markets

    02.19.10 03:00 AM

    President Obama to Announce Funding to Help Address Urgent Problems Facing Families in States with High Unemployment and Where Home Prices Have Fallen the Furthest

    Today, President Obama will announce funding for innovative measures to help families in the states that have been hit the hardest by the aftermath of the housing bubble. In each of these states, the average price for all homeowners in the state has fallen more than 20% from the peak. Home prices across the country are beginning to stabilize since the Administration’s economic policies began to take effect almost a year ago. But the legacy of price declines, together with the effects of high unemployment, means that many working and middle-class families in these especially hard-hit areas are facing serious challenges, in many cases beyond what their families’ resources can handle.

    President Obama recognizes the challenges facing our families in the nation’s housing markets, where local conditions vary considerably. The Administration is setting up an innovation fund to expand the capacity of housing finance and similar agencies in the hardest-hit areas, so that those states and localities can further respond to the most pressing problems in their communities.

    Help for the Hardest-Hit Housing Markets (4HM)

    $1.5 Billion to Work with State Housing Agencies to Innovate and Help Address the Problems Facing the Hardest-Hit Housing MarketsThere will be a formula for allocating funding among eligible states that will be based on home price declines and unemployment.HFAs must have program design approved by Treasury.Programs may include:ures for unemployed homeowners;Programs to assist borrowers owing more than their home is now worth;Programs that help address challenges arising from second mortgages; orOther programs encouraging sustainable and affordable homeownership.Accountability and Transparency for these Housing ProgramsAll funded program designs posted online.Accountability for results – program effectiveness measured and results published online.The program will apply to states that have suffered an average home price drop of over 20% from the peak. State and local Housing Finance Agencies (HFAs) in each state are already familiar with the urgent challenges facing their communities and have demonstrated the ability to address these challenges. For that reason, we will work with these HFAs to expand their capacity to help address these challenges, with $1.5 billion from the funds set aside for housing under the Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008.The HFAs will determine the priorities facing their local markets. The plans will be under strict transparency and accountability rules. The increase in HFA resources for these areas should provide meaningful support for families in these markets, when combined with the numerous other steps the administration has taken to address housing markets.Funds can be used for innovation to take steps to address difficult, locally-important remaining challenges for the hardest-hit housing markets, including unemployed borrowers, underwater borrowers, and second liens.Under this program, HFAs can submit program designs to Treasury. To be eligible for funding, HFA program designs must meet program goals of providing meaningful support for housing in the hardest-hit markets. Programs must meet funding requirements under EESA. These include that the recipient of funds must be an eligible financial institution and that the funds must be used to pay for mortgage modifications or for other permitted uses under EESA. Treasury will announce maximum state level allocations in the next two weeks, along with rules governing the submission of program designs by HFAs, and provide a period thereafter for HFAs to submit their program designs in order to receive funding. Illustrations of the Sorts of Programs that May be Funded in the States

    Housing markets vary considerably from state to state, and often within a single state. Housing Finance Agencies are intimately engaged already in their local housing markets, and will play the lead role in determining what sorts of programs are most appropriate to local conditions. Three sorts of problems that may be addressed with funding are unemployed borrowers, underwater borrowers, and second liens:

    1. Unemployed borrowers. Since the recession began in 2008, unemployment has hit many families who own homes. In previous times, when house prices were rising, families with unemployment could often sell their homes for more than they had paid, using the proceeds to tide them over.

    Today, by contrast, families in states where prices have dropped more than 20% often find themselves owing more than the house is worth in the current market. Such homes are often difficult to sell, and families with unemployment often can’t pay the current mortgage and may not have enough income to qualify for a modification.

    In such circumstances, one use of funds would be for HFAs to begin programs to help unemployed homeowners until they have secured a new job. HFAs can consider a variety of programs to help unemployed borrowers.

    2. Underwater borrowers. For states with more than 20% home price declines, a large portion of homeowners are “underwater” — they owe more than the house is worth in the current market. Such borrowers often find it difficult to sell their homes — lenders may not agree to a sale that fails to pay back a mortgage in full. HFAs may experiment with programs that would assist borrowers to negotiate with lenders to write down mortgages.

    3. Second liens. An important problem can arise when borrowers have a home equity line of credit or other second mortgage on their home. In these instances, the first mortgage lender may be willing to adjust to the home price decline by modifying the loan.

    Difficulties can emerge, however, in coordinating between the first and second mortgage lender. To smooth this coordination problem, and help assure that homeowners get an overall modification that works best, funds can be used to pay incentives to the second mortgage holders, addressing this potential obstacle to re-setting the market.

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • President Obama, Department of Education Announce Race to the Top High School Commenc

    02.19.10 05:36 AM

    WASHINGTON – The White House and the Department of Education announced today the first annual Race to the Top High School Commencement Challenge, inviting public schools across the country to compete to have President Obama speak at their graduation this spring.

    “Public schools that encourage systemic reform and embrace effective approaches to teaching and learning help prepare America’s students to graduate ready for college and a career, and enable them to out-compete any worker, anywhere in the world,” said President Obama in a video released today. “This is your opportunity to show me why your school exemplifies the best that our education system has to offer.”

    “The Race to the Top Commencement Challenge is an amazing opportunity for our nation’s high schools to share their accomplishments and aspirations,” said Secretary of Education Arne Duncan. “I look forward to hearing about the many dedicated principals, teachers and parents who work tremendously hard to ensure and promote academic excellence, and I look forward to hearing about the many students across this country who are putting their education first and taking responsibility for their future.”

    At the beginning of the school year, the President encouraged students across the country to take responsibility for their education, study hard and graduate from high school. The Race to the Top High School Commencement Challenge encourages schools to show how they are making great strides on personal responsibility, academic excellence and college readiness.

    Background Information on the Commencement Challenge:

    Applications should be completed by students and must be submitted by a high school’s principal to www.WhiteHouse.gov/Commencement no later than Monday, March 15th at 11:59 pm EST. Each school may submit only one application and high schools must be public to apply. Following the application deadline, six finalists will be selected by the White House and Department of Education. These schools will then be featured on the White House website and the public will have an opportunity to vote for the three schools they think best meet the President’s goal. The President will select a national winner from these three finalists and visit the winning high school to deliver the commencement address to the class of 2010.

    The application’s four essay questions focus on demonstrating how the school is helping prepare students to meet the President’s 2020 goal of having the highest proportion of college graduates in the world. Applications will be judged based on the school’s performance and dedication to providing students an excellent education that will prepare them to graduate ready for college and career choices. Each question must be answered in full to qualify and data that substantiates each answer is strongly encouraged.
    In addition to the required essay responses, applicants are invited to submit the following optional supplemental materials:

    A video – no more than 2 minutes in length – showing the school’s culture and character and highlighting how it is a model of educational success for other high schools around the country. Supplemental data on key indicators such as attendance, student achievement, graduation rates and where available, college enrollment rates. This data may be presented in the form of tables, graphs or spreadsheets and should be used to help the school make the most compelling arguments possible.Text of President Obama’s Video

    In a few short months, high school students across the country will put on their caps and gowns, pick up their diplomas, and prepare to start an exciting new chapter in their lives.

    Graduation is an important moment for anyone. But a high school diploma is also important to our success as a nation – and it’s only the beginning. That’s why I’ve set a goal that, by 2020, America will once again have the highest proportion of college graduates in the world. We’ve started by investing billions of dollars in strengthening our nation’s schools – setting higher standards, supporting teachers and principals, and boosting the number of students who graduate high school ready for college or a career.

    But the government can’t meet this goal alone – we need your help. And that’s why today I’m excited to announce the first annual “Race to the Top” High School Commencement Challenge. Just go to whitehouse.gov/commencement and fill out an application by March 15th telling us why your school is special and why it should be a model for other schools around the country working to boost attendance and increase the number of graduates prepared for college or a career. This spring, I’ll visit the winning school to speak at commencement.

    Good luck – and thank you for doing your part to help make our students the best and brightest in the world.

    White House.gov Press Office Feed

  • Remarks by The President at A Reception for Senator Bennet

    02.19.10 07:11 AM

    February 18, 2010

    5:04 P.M. MST

    THE PRESIDENT: Hello, Denver! (Applause.) Well, it is good to be back in Denver. (Applause.) Good to be in Colorado. And good to be campaigning for one of the finest young senators we have in the United States Senate, Michael Bennet. (Applause.)

    I have to confess, the reason I was delayed, I was grabbing one of those little canapés. (Laughter.) Quite tasty. He had one, too.

    AUDIENCE MEMBER: Thanks for the snow.

    THE PRESIDENT: You’re welcome. Well, look, it is wonderful to be here. We just came from the Fillmore Auditorium, where we had — what did we have, a couple thousand people? Twenty-four hundred people. (Applause.) Not that he’s counting. Because they understand that at this defining moment in our history, we’ve got to have people who are willing to fight on behalf of families all across America. And they know that Michael got into this business because he believes in that fight.

    Now, before I go on, I think there are a couple people who are still around, I’m not sure if they’re out here. But the senior senator from Colorado, Brother Udall is right here. Give him a big round of applause. (Applause.) And a great friend and a terrific governor of California is here — where’s Governor Ritter, where did he go? Colorado, sorry. What did I say? (Laughter.) California. Listen, East Coast time, it’s past my dinner. That’s why I — give Bill Ritter a big round of applause. (Applause.)

    All right, now, back to what I was saying. (Laughter.) You know, obviously we know that the country is going through a tough time. But when I was here a year ago, at Mile High, and some of you were probably here — (applause) — some of you were there with me — I made a promise to you not that I was going to tell you what you wanted to hear, not that I was always going to do what was popular. But I promised you that I would wake up each and every day thinking about how we can make sure that the American Dream is working for everybody, and more importantly, how we can make sure that it’s working for the next generation.

    And one of the things throughout my campaign for the presidency was reminding America that this isn’t about a candidate, this is about the people; that change comes from the bottom up, not from the top down; and that the kind of transformation that we needed was not going to happen because you elected me as President, because — but rather because all of us together were willing to join and all of us were willing to take responsibility.

    Now, one of the things, the great things that you did was to send two outstanding United States senators with me on this difficult journey. And we’ve got to make sure that Michael continues on that journey with me. (Applause.) Because the same things that we fought for in 2008, the same things that I campaigned on, that same spirit — that’s what driven Michael all his life. He knows what it’s like to come from humble beginnings. He knows what it’s like to make sure that everybody is going to have a chance in life.

    And that’s why, even though he was successful in business and the private sector, he decided that he could make his biggest contribution by going into public service, and I’m sure taking a really big pay cut. (Laughter.)

    So working with the outstanding mayor and soon-to-be governor, John Hickenlooper — (applause) — he helped to balance budgets, he helped to make sure that this city was running as well as it’s ever run, a model for cities across the nation. And then he decided, well, that’s not a big enough challenge; let me try to fix the school system. And he took that on. And he did it with the same energy and the same determination and the same capacity to bring discordant voices together and get them to work and think in new ways. And as a consequence, you saw the performance of this school district go up as fast as any school district anywhere in the country.

    So he’s been a business executive, he’s somebody who’s run a school system and made it work for children, and then he decided, well, let me try this U.S. Senate thing.

    Now, I’m not sure he knew entirely what he was bargaining for. Udall might have warned him a little bit, because Udall had been in Congress for a while. But the truth is, Michael is a pretty bright guy, and he understood this was not going to be an easy year or two to get started in electoral politics.

    I mean, think about where we were last year. Michael took his spot about two days after I was inaugurated, and at that point, we already understood that we had the worst recession since the Great Depression; we’re losing 800,000 jobs per month; we knew that the financial system was on the verge of meltdown; we knew that we were involved in two wars; that we were inheriting a $1.3 trillion deficit. We knew that this was going to be a tough time.

    So nobody would have blamed Michael if he had said, you know, maybe I’ll make my maiden race four years from now when things are looking a little bit better. But that’s not what he did. He stepped up. And not only did he step up, but since he has been in Washington, there has not been a better champion on behalf of middle-class folks and on behalf of the dreams and aspirations that each of you carry for your children and your grandchildren than Michael Bennet. (Applause.) There has not been anybody who’s been fighting harder for you and taking the tough votes.

    He was with me when we signed the Recovery Act — (applause) — that has provided a tax cut for 95 percent of working families; created an entire new sector of clean energy. Did you know that when we started last year, the Recovery Act, we had about 2 percent of the advanced battery production here in the United States; almost all of it was coming from Asia. We now have 20 percent capacity, and we’re going to go up to 40 percent capacity. (Applause.) That’s because of the kind of work that Michael Bennet, working with his partner, Senator Udall, did.

    We provided the biggest boost in education from the federal government in our history, and not just any kind of money but rewarding success, rewarding reform, investing in research and development and math and science education, because we understand that whatever country out-educates us today is going to out-compete us tomorrow, and we will not tolerate America being number two or number three in the number of scientists and mathematicians. (Applause.)

    We made investments not just in roads and bridges, as important those are, but we made investments in smart grid and high-speed rail and broadband — the infrastructure of the 21st century that’s going to make sure that we can compete. All these things were because Michael pushed and Michael supported an agenda that was not only going to deal with the immediate crisis but looking beyond trying to figure out what our future was going to be.

    And that’s just one of the fights he’s fought. Alongside me and the rest of the Democrats in the Senate, we’ve been able to make sure that credit cards were no longer the source of abuse for ordinary consumers. (Applause.) We passed housing fraud legislation to make sure that people weren’t taken advantage with predatory loans. We passed the largest expansion of national service that our young people can get involved at an early age in giving back to America. We provided children — 4 million children in this country, without passing health care — comprehensive health care yet, we’ve already provided 4 million children with health care that didn’t have it before Michael joined the United States Senate. (Applause.)

    So this guy’s been fighting for you. Now you need to fight for him. Because the fact of the matter is, is that this is a tough political environment. I’m not telling anything — anybody anything they don’t know. As successful as the Recovery Act and our other steps have been in breaking the back of the recession, there are still millions of people out there who are struggling, who are trying to figure out how to pay the mortgage; they’re seeing their homes underwater; they’re worried about whether they can find a job if they’ve already lost the one that they had.

    And so understandably people are scared. And sometimes when people are scared, politics can get rough. That’s not unique to this period of time; that’s been true throughout our history. And it doesn’t help when you’ve got an opposition that is more interested in tearing the other party down than they are in building America up.

    But what Michael understands is that as many barriers as there may be in front of us, we’ve got to keep on going, because just walking away is not an option. Look, he hasn’t been in politics long enough to understand that the easiest way to get reelected is just to wave and smile and don’t say anything offensive. (Laughter.) Keep your head down, don’t do anything. That’s the best way to keep your poll numbers high.

    But he understands that we can’t afford that. We can’t afford to walk away from a clean energy future. We can’t afford to walk away from making sure that our education system is producing the kinds of scientists and engineers and entrepreneurs that are going to build our economy in the future. We can’t afford to walk away from a health care system that is broken for everybody — for small businesses and large businesses; for families who are seeing their premiums go up 25 percent, 30 percent, 35 percent; for the millions who don’t have health insurance at all; and for future generations who are going to have to carry the bill if we don’t get control of health care costs like Medicare and Medicaid. He understands we cannot walk away from it and we will not walk away from it. (Applause.) If I’ve got Michael Bennet’s help, we are going to get health care reform passed in this country. (Applause.)

    So, yes, it’s tough. (Laughter.) But we’re tougher. (Applause.) We’ve been through tougher times; our parents, our grandparents. Many of you in your own lives, you know what it’s like when you hit a barrier. There are times where you feel doubtful; there are times where you get weary. But what has defined America throughout our history is that in fits and starts, we just keep on going forward. And we’re driven not just by self-interest, we’re driven not just by greed or not just by inquisitiveness. We’re driven by a sense of responsibility and obligation to others, to this country, to our community, to our children, to the next generation. (Applause.)

    That’s what drove Michael into public service. That’s what is keeping him going, even when he’s away from that gorgeous family of his. And that’s why he needs you.

    Look, there will continue to be special interests and lobbyists and those in Washington who are going to try to go after a guy like this who plays it straight. They’re going to try to take him out. They’ve got all their pollsters and their — and we got to — this is a rookie here. The guy has never cut a TV ad. (Laughter.) He doesn’t know how to speak in seven-minute — seven-second sound bites. (Laughter.)

    So they’ve got a target on him. And this becomes a test of what kind of government do we want. Do we want the kind of government where an outstanding individual who’s in it for all the right reasons and has a track record of success in making systems work for ordinary people — are we going to make sure that this guy has a long and outstanding career in Washington? (Applause.) And are we going to channel that anger and that frustration we feel sometimes, understanding that Michael is not part of the problem, he’s part of the solution — (applause) — and that he’s somebody who is going to change Washington if you send him back there and give him the kind of mandate that he deserves? (Applause.)

    So my bottom line is this — my bottom line is this: As hard as you worked in 2008, you’ve got to work harder in 2010. (Applause.) If you raised money for me, I want you to raise more money for Michael Bennet. (Applause.) If you made more — if you made phone calls for me, I want you to make more phones calls and I want you to Twitter, too, for Michael Bennet. (Applause.) If you knocked on doors on your block, I want you to go in your whole neighborhood for Michael Bennet. (Applause.)

    I want you to work hard, because if you do, then I am absolutely confident that not only is Michael Bennet going to continue to be the United States senator from Colorado, I am confident that this is going to be one of the most outstanding senators that we’ve ever had and a great leader for all of America.

    Thank you very much, Denver. Let’s get to work. Let’s get busy. God bless you.

    END
    5:20 P.M. MST

    White House.gov Press Office Feed