Category: News

  • Hulme CanAm now available for order – Hurry, just 20 available

    Filed under: , ,

    Hulme CanAm – Click above for high-res image gallery

    Nearly four years after its debut, New Zealand-based Hulme Supercars has finally opened up the order books for the CanAm, but if you want one, you had better move fast. Hulme will build only 20 examples of the CanAm and they are going on a first come, first serve basis. To get on the order list, prospective customers will have to submit a £10,000 fully refundable deposit (that’s around $14,400 at current exchange rates). Production of the CanAm won’t start until the fall of 2011 and Hulme will hold a private showing and test drive sometime before the 2011 Goodwood Festival of Speed.

    Hulme will put the deposits in a trust account that will be returned for any prospective customers that decide to cancel. For those that decide to take delivery, the $700,000+ purchase price includes two business class tickets to Auckland, New Zealand for final fitting of the car and some local driving time. Once the customer is satisfied, the car will get shipped to its final destination.

    Gallery: Hulme CanAm

    [Source: Hulme Supercars]

    Continue reading Hulme CanAm now available for order – Hurry, just 20 available

    Hulme CanAm now available for order – Hurry, just 20 available originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 26 May 2010 15:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments

  • Markets TANK In Final Moments Of The Day: Here’s What You Need To Know (BP, USO, GLD, SPY)

    kickboxing women headbutt punching ring

    After surging by as much as 2% at one point, markets collapsed in the final moments of the day, a session that will prove very dispiriting for the bulls.

    But first, the scoreboard:

    Dow: -70 (below 10,000!)
    S&P 500: -6.2
    NASDAQ: -15.07

    And now, the key stories.

    • Once again, the see-saw market is the story of the day. Stocks were up very big early, following a good overnight session, and then collapsed in the final hour. The whole day felt like yesterday, but in reverse. Bulls who were hoping that a rising market would become the new norm on days with little news will be sorely disappointed. See 10 key economic indicators that are already rolling over here >
    • BP’s “Top Kill” began at 2:00 PM ET, though we won’t know for awhile whether the attempt to fill the leaking well with mud will work. It could take anywhere from 10 hours to two days to see results.
    • New home sales came in well above expectations, providing a nice lift homebuilders early on, but the number is still influenced by the homebuyer tax credit. The next wave of housing data will provide a nice look at post-hangover information.
    • Commodities painted a mixed picture. Gold moved higher, showing it was not falling victim to a flight to liquidity. Oil was up nicely, as well, while, copper and palladium were both down.

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • MacBook Pro Decal Reveals Secret LOST Ending [Accessories]

    Admit it. If you found out that Apple was behind the Dharma Initiative, it would have been a pretty freaking satisfying ending to LOST. Celebrate the non-reveal with this laptop decal that costs $5. [Etsy via ChipChick] More »










    AppleMacBookHardwareMacintoshNotebooks and Laptops

  • More Than $2 Million In Two Months!

    Yes, that’s how much a parents group raised for their local school district. Due to state budget cuts the Cupertino Union School District, comprising 25 elementary and middle schools, was poised to eliminate more that 100 teaching positions for the upcoming school year.  Some parents mobilized.  They partnered with the Cupertino Educational Endowment Foundation and launched Their Future is Now campaign.  It worked and in eight weeks they raised $2.2 million. Read more about it in Sharon Naguchi’s article “Flush with $2.2 million success, Cupertino parents share secrets” in the Mecury News.

  • Facebook's New Privacy Rules Are Simple and Smart

    Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg announced new, simple privacy controls today after weeks of withering criticism and multiple reports of users deleting their profiles. Zuckerberg told reporters on a conference call that he agreed with critics that the company’s privacy controls had become arcane and damaging to Facebook’s chief mission: helping its 400 million members connect and share information.

    “People want to connect,” Zuckerberg said. “And the best way is to give them control. We really do believe in privacy.”

    The new privacy control, which will roll out in the next few weeks, is a grid that lets you share various types of information across three categories: everyone, friends of friends only, or friends only. The recommended default (as captured in a screen shot below) would make posts and profiles public to everyone; personal information like photos and birthdays public to friends of friends; and private info like email addresses available to friends only.

    Another privacy lets you sever ties with Facebook applications and third parties with a click, rather than opting out on a per-application and per-party basis. More specific controls are available in the custom settings. In sum, it’s a good move for Facebook provided that they don’t tinker with settings (as they have three times in the last seven months).

    “This is the end of the overhaul that we’re doing,” Zuckerberg said. “One of the big takeaways is, don’t make any privacy changes for a long time.”

    facebook privacy.png
    Much of the talk tried to put Facebook’s new changes in historical context. As Facebook has grown and added features, Zuckerberg argued, it has sometimes struggled to balance two missions: to help people share information across networks and to give them granular controls over how they share they share that information.

    His answer to a question about advertising was surprising.

    “There’s this big misperception that we’re making these changes because it’s good for advertising,” he said. “Anybody who knows me knows that’s crazy. There’s this idea that if people share info more openly it’s good for ad targeting. It’s the opposite.”

    Here was his reasoning: Facebook shows advertisements to users whose private information indicates they might be interested in the product. For example, if LiveNation wants to sell Coldplay tickets, and I say I like Coldplay, Facebook might show me LiveNation ads by my profile. If Facebook makes that information public, Zuckerberg said, it loses proprietary control over the information. The company’s incentive, he said, was to be jealous over its users’ data.

    “We really don’t think about revenue at all,” Zuckerberg said in a moment that slightly strained credibility. “When we’re building platform, it factors in like not at all.”

    Facebook might not care about its potential impact on targeted advertising and the rest of the Internet, but maybe it should. First, as Gawker’s Ryan Tate points out, it sort of has a fiduciary responsibility to think about revenue. The Open Graph protocal, which collects already public information such as users’ “likes” throughout the Web, sounds like it could create living, breathing semantic memory
    of its users’ preferences. This has fascinating implications. Imagine browsing CNN on your smart
    phone downtown, and a mobile ad pops up with a happy hour coupon for a
    restaurant you said you liked on Yelp. Or imagine a better news aggregation
    site, a waterfall of links with all of the articles “liked” by friends
    who self-identify as conservative on Facebook.

    “We listened to the feedback [on privacy concerns] and we agree with it,” Zuckerberg said today. Good thing, that. But as the company has grown from a lively yearbook, to a 21st Yellow Pages, to an Web-wide ecosystem of “likes,” it should think about ways to balance its privacy mandate with its pubic capability to do amazing things for the larger Internet community.





    Email this Article
    Add to digg
    Add to Reddit
    Add to Twitter
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to StumbleUpon
    Add to Facebook






    FacebookMark ZuckerbergPrivacyLiveNationYellow Pages

  • Zuckerberg: It’s Not About the Ads!

    Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg today rejected the assumption that the social networking company wants to make user data more public because it serves its advertising business. “There’s a big misperception that we’re making these changes for advertising,” he said on a media call laying out refreshed privacy settings. “Anyone who knows me knows that that’s crazy.”

    Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg

    “We are working on building an ad business,” Zuckerberg said, “but when we are working on building products, this factors in not at all. It’s such a big disconnect.” And more than being just a matter of philosophy, Zuckerberg said, the Facebook system does not pass personally identifiable information to advertisers. “The principles of the system are we don’t give any info to advertisers. We target all the ads ourselves.”

    He contended that when Facebook does share user information, it’s for the unselfish purposes of data portability, to enable other developers, including competitors, to target ads.

    As for whether advertising is the reason Facebook has in the past moved some default setting to make user information more public, Zuckerberg said, “The only reason we recommend the settings we do is we think they’re the best settings.”

    Zuckerberg’s defiant attitude on ads was markedly different from the rest of his presentation about better privacy controls. On privacy, he said he and his team agreed with user and media feedback. But on advertising, he said he finds articles and blogs about the topic upsetting and uninformed.

    Still, this is going to be a tough battle of perception, especially as Facebook becomes integrated into more and more of the Internet, beyond “the little website we have today,” as Zuckerberg called it. While I might be inclined to believe Facebook’s management team when they say they put product first, many people are skeptical and cynical about the company, and Zuckerberg in particular.

    Even what seem to be minor and quickly corrected slip-ups, like exposing user data to other sites through referring URLs, are major at the scale of almost 500 million users. And the fact is that Facebook’s monetization engine is at its most powerful when it understands user intent, something that’s increasingly precise and real-time due to the company’s work across the web. Meanwhile, advertisers are hungry for data, and brands that participate on Facebook are eager to find out more about their users.

    Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d):

    Social Advertising Models Go Back to the Future



    Atimi: Software Development, On Time. Learn more about Atimi »

  • NASA’s vision gets another battering

    For the second time this month, NASA’s chief faced tough talk on Capitol Hill from lawmakers – as well as from Apollo moonwalkers Neil Armstrong and Gene Cernan, plus longtime aerospace executive Tom Young.

  • 2011 Mercedes-Benz S350 4MATIC BlueTec Diesel – Car News

    The diesel S-class returns to the U.S. after a 16-year hiatus.

    Mercedes-Benz is adding another efficiency-minded model to the S-class lineup by bringing the European S350 diesel to the U.S. for 2011. As configured here, the S350’s 3.0-liter turbo-diesel V-6 will be rated at 241 hp and 429 lb-ft of torque, up from 235 hp and 398 lb-ft for the Euro model. The S350 will be the only full-size luxury sedan offered with a diesel engine in the States.

    Keep Reading: 2011 Mercedes-Benz S350 4MATIC BlueTec Diesel – Car News

    No related posts.

  • Endocrine disruptors really do suck

    by Tom Laskawy.

    U.S. manufacturers and agribusiness are addicted to endocrine disruptors—dangerous chemicals that alter the natural function of the body’s hormones. They are frequently used in plastics, in pesticides, and in personal care products and act in the human body as a “false” version of estrogen. They appear to be linked to a variety of diseases, including sexual dysfunction, heart disease, metabolic disorders, and cancer. New York Times columnist Nick Kristof wrote a frightening summary of the health and evironmental risks of this class of chemicals about a year ago that’s still timely.

    Although the controversial plastic ingredient bisphenol-A, used in canned foods and baby bottles, is certainly the poster child for endocrine disruptors’ ubiquity, it is merely one of many. The pesticide atrazine, banned in the European Union but still widely overused in the U.S., is also a potent endocrine disruptor, as is the chemical oxybenzone, one of the most common ingredients in U.S.-sold sunscreen, though it too is banned in the E.U.

    These, of course, are only the high-profile examples. For each one, industry threatens the End of Civilization in the event that the FDA attempts to restrict one or another. Atrazine, for example, is currently under review by the EPA. Despite the fact that European farmers seem to have maintained yields wthout the chemical, American agribusiness still manages to say with a straight face that banning atrazine will cause U.S. corn yields to drop precipitiously. Meanwhile, we learn that atrazine, one of the most common waterway contaminants in the entire country, can disrupt the hormone function (and reproduction) of fish at levels well below legal pollution limits.

    The resistance of the industry and our own elected representatives to acting on our behalf is scary enough. But far more terrifying is the research that continues to pour in showing the dangers of endocrine-disrupting chemicals. Now a group of longtime environmental researchers from Tufts University have done their own review of past research into BPA and other endocrine disruptors (abstract available here).

    Their conclusions:

    1) BPA and chemicals like it do indeed pose an increased cancer risk—that’s in addition to the reproductive and metabolic risks they represent. And these chemicals represent a real and potent threat to the health of pregnant women and their fetuses.

    2) The complexity of these chemicals and their interactions is so great that we don’t even have the tools to determine what they’re really doing to us. We truly are lab rats in a worldwide experiment.

    The researchers conclude that there is more than enough evidence to support “rapid action to diminish these harmful environmental exposures.”

    In other words: FDA and EPA, get off your arses and ban this stuff now.

    Related Links:

    ‘Dumpsites in Disguise’

    Let’s Move needs to get real with the food industry

    Big energy vs. coal ash regulation






  • Wither Consumer Confidence?

    Just yesterday, the Conference Board reported that consumer confidence is up in May — way up. But an updated reading from Gallup says otherwise. Consumer confidence may have actually fallen last week.

    The Conference’s Board reading only went through May 18th. But Gallup provides weekly poll results on consumer confidence. So it has new data through May 23rd. Here’s what it shows:

    gallup confidence 2010-05-23.gif

    Although Gallup’s data doesn’t precisely coincide with the Conference Board’s magnitudes prior to May 23rd, they both agree that confidence had risen since March through mid-May. But last week, that ending May 23rd, Gallup saw a big 5-point drop. That erased its April gain, to put it back at late-March levels.

    What happened last week? Gallup says:

    This likely reflects fallout from the European financial crisis manifested in the declining U.S. stock market, and not included in Tuesday’s consumer confidence report.

    So perhaps Europe and other general economic worries are beginning to weigh on American consumers. The stock market, in particular, could be a major area of anxiety. It’s down about 10% since its April high. Even if consumers aren’t worried about Europe, they may have felt a hit to their portfolios over the past month.





    Email this Article
    Add to digg
    Add to Reddit
    Add to Twitter
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to StumbleUpon
    Add to Facebook






    Conference BoardUnited StatesGallupConsumer confidenceFinancial crisis

  • 50 Cent Skinny! Rapper’s Shocking Weight Loss For Dramatic Film Role


    50 Cent or The Black Powder?

    Don’t be alarmed. This isn’t a photo of my alcoholic Uncle Eddie after knocking back one too many cups of eggnog at the annual family Christmas party. (Although the resemblance is striking….) It’s only 50 Cent, trading his perfectly-chiseled frame in exchange for a bag of bones and a few acting accolades.

    The things a guy will do for an Oscar these day! Hey, it worked for DeNiro. The actor gained a record 60 pounds to play the older Jake La Motta for his Oscar-winning role in the 1980 Scorsese classic Raging Bull.

    But I digress….


    Curtis is taking this thespian thing very seriously. 50 lost almost 60 pounds to portray a promising college football player suddenly diagnosed with cancer in the upcoming box office drama Things Fall Apart. The “In Da Club” star dropped from 214 pounds to an astonishing 160 with a liquid diet and three-hour-a-day treadmill workouts for nine weeks.

    Mr. Jackson, we command you to start downing Big Macs and Coca-Cola. Stat!

    Spotted@


  • BMW publica las especificaciones del M3 GTS

    bmw_m3_8.jpg
    El BMW M3 GTS ya ha sido colocado entre los compradores y es ahora cuando deciden, finalmente, hacer públicas sus especificaciones. En un principio solamente sabíamos que el motor era un 4.4 litros V8 modificado, pero ni caballaje ni aceleración habían trascendido.

    Tras el salto puedes encontrar las especificaciones completas. Ya no puedes acercarte a un concesionario y pedirlo pero siempre puedes deleitarte con su aceleración y soñar con que, dentro de unos años, podremos acercarnos a los foros especializados para verlos en el mercado de segunda mano.

    • Peso (tara/DIN): 1.530/1.605 kg
    • Resistencia aerodinámica (cd x A): 0,34 x 2,17
    • Cilindrada: 4.361 cc, V8
    • Potencia máxima (kW/CV): 331/450 a 8.300 rpm
    • Par motor (Nm) 440 Nm a 3.750 rpm
    • Frenos delanteros: seis pistones, discos ventilados y perforados de 378 x 32 mm
    • Frenos traseros: cuatro pistones, discos ventilados y perforados de 380 x 28 mm
    • Neumáticos delanteros y traseros: 255/35 ZR19 – 285/30 ZR19
    • Aceleración 0–100 km/h: 4,4 segundos
    • 0–1.000 m: 22,5 segundos
    • Velocidad máxima: 305 km/h
    • Consumo en ciudad: 18,4 L/ 100 km
    • Consumo en carretera: 9,3 L/100 km
    • Consumo en ciclo combinado: 12,7 L/100 km
    • Emisiones de CO2: 295 g/km

    Vía | Autbolog



  • “I Spent Two Days As A Door-To-Door Salesman”

    Kole McRae is a writer in Toronto who says he worked for two days as a door-to-door salesman for an unnamed company. The sales pitch involved asking people who answered the door whether they were happy with their current service, so I’m guessing the company sold something something related to phone, cable, or utilities.

    The following is my account of working as a door to door salesmen last summer. I have changed the names of the supervisor I worked with and removed the name of the company I was selling for. I did this for privacy reasons but if you conclude that the companies name is necessary I will add it. Everything else is true and has not been altered in any way.

    Day 1

    I woke up at 9am for my first day. According to the manager who interviewed me, today would be a day long job interview. I would work with one of his employees for a day and then he would make a decision based on what that employee said. I had no idea this was a door to door job. The ad I responded to had called it “marketing”. It was really vague about what exactly you did but a lot of job ads are so I didn’t find it suspicious.

    I walked into the office around 11am. It was pretty boring. A couple pieces of art and inspirational quotes. It wasn’t huge but it wasn’t tiny. The kind of office a small business would fit into comfortably. The receptionist told me to sit nearby and the manager would be with me shortly. Everyone that walked in after me was wearing a suit and tie, I didn’t expect this and felt under dressed in my khakis and brown collared shirt. After about ten minutes the manager came out and informed us that he was just in a meeting and would be joining us shortly. All in all there were 4 other people with me in the office.

    From a nearby door we heard shouting and banging that almost sounded like dance music. It was obvious there were a lot of people in there. The boss came out of the room with a young employee behind him. He looked at a piece of paper and called out my name. I followed them into the same office I was interviewed in.

    “This is Matt, he’ll be showing you the ropes today. Learn what you can and if he likes you, you have the job.”

    Matt looked about the same age as me (early 20’s), he was taller and had dark hair. He looked me up and down then shook my hand. We left the office and started walking outside.

    “Where are we going?” I asked.

    “To the field, you look like you have some spunk in you, we need that. Energy leads to sales.”

    That should have been a major red flag but I went with it. I had been unemployed for a while and desperately needed the job. Though I was willing to do anything I still felt something bad in the pit of my stomach. We headed to the bus station and he took out some change. He stood with me at the bus stop. Did he expect me to pay for my own transportation? Luckily I had some bus tickets left over from my last job so I took one out of my wallet and waited with him in silence. It was very awkward.

    “So it’s sales, what are we selling?”

    “A new service from (deleted). Most people already have one of their services so it should be easy to hook them up with the new one. Trust me, it’s easy money.”

    The fact that he felt the need to say that made me uneasy, that feeling stuck with me the entire bus trip. When we arrived at the field which ended up being a small suburban community he pulled out a big piece of paper. He said it was the names of everyone in the area that used (deleted)’s services. That seemed like a major privacy issue but I ignored it and we walked up to the first house. It was obvious at this point that I was about the enter the world of door to door sales.

    Before ringing the doorbell he took off his tie and untucked his shirt, mumbling something about not wanting to seem too professional. He then rang it and we waited. This turned out to be a major part of the job. Not many people were home at noon, most people had jobs. So for the first hour we didn’t talk to anyone. We mostly swapped stories about crappy jobs we’ve had in the past.

    Finally, about an hour later someone answered the door. Matt jumped into his pitch.

    “Hi, I see you have services with (deleted) were going door to door today taking a survey to find out what people think. So have you had any issues with (deleted) recently?”

    “Umm, no. Everything is going fine.”

    “Good!”

    Matt made a mark on the piece of paper he was holding. Matt then went into a sales pitch about the new service and got the door slammed in his face. Afterwards I asked him if anyone got the results of the survey.

    “No, we don’t actually do a survey, we just say that so people don’t slam the door in our face right away.”

    “So you lie?”

    “No, it’s just… It’s not like I’m stealing money out of their hands, Were saving people money here. Were giving them money.”

    As I said, I needed the job so I didn’t push it. We continued this way until about 5pm when I started to get hungry. I looked at my watch and assumed we would be finished soon. I asked when.

    “Most people are home between 5 and 9 so we work until 9 every day.”

    I did the math quickly and I figured that I would be working 10 hour days, 6 days a week. I better make good money doing this.

    “We get about 35 dollars per signup, most people get 3 or 4 sign ups a day.”

    That means for working 10 hours you get paid 105 bucks. That’s under the national minimum wage. This job was looking worse and worse. It was the middle of summer so I was hot and sweaty, walking for 9 hours straight and only getting paid 9 bucks an hour to do it. At that point I almost gave up but a quick thought about how empty my bank account was cleared my head and I continued to soldier on.

    Throughout the day Matt got yelled at three times, got bit by two dogs and had one guy theaten his life. He said it was all part of the job and that the danger made it kind of fun. I kind of agreed with him. He made one sale that night before we packed it in and took a bus back. He said he usually got more but today was a bad day.

    We got to the office and Matt got me to sit in reception again. I sat and waited, of the four of us that had the day long interview only me and one other person remained. The manager came out of his office and brought in the other person. They came out about five minutes later and the person walked out of the office, then it was my turn.

    With a huge grin on his face the manager told me how Matt had said all these wonderful things about me. He offered me a job on the spot. Thinking about my empty wallet, I accepted.

    Day 2

    I woke up that morning feeling a little better about the job. It wasn’t the best in the world but hey, it had to be better than fast food. I put on a suit I had thrown together from a thrift store and headed to my first day of work. I was in a surprisingly good mood.

    I had been told the night before to show up about an hour before I did on my “trial” day. This was so I could attend a “morning meeting” that would go over some important information. So around 10am I walked into the office. I followed one of the other employees past the reception area and into the main area of the office. This room was a large empty square with a giant white board on one wall. It had no desks, no cubicles, nothing. People in suits, most of which were in their 20’s, milled around talking about boring stuff. Matt saw me and walked over.

    “Hey man, welcome back. Your on my team so I’ll be teaching you. You listen to what I have to say and you’ll be having 300 dollar days in no time.”

    Matt started teaching me a bit about sales when the boss walked in and everyone immediately went quiet. The energy of the place was super high, you could feel electricity in the air. The boss started talking about accomplishment. He then went into a story about a giraffe that was just born at a nearby zoo and how it needed to learn and adapt to survive, just like we needed to if we wanted to survive in sales. This guy had more charisma than any human should. He introduced me as the new guy (I guess the other person decided not to show up). Everyone yelled my name and increased the energy ten fold. The way the meeting was run it felt eerily similar to videos I’ve seen of cults.

    I would work with Matt again that day and would be paid exactly half of whatever me and Matt sold. This seemed like a lose lose situation for Matt and I. I looked around and realized Matt was only teaching sales to me. I thought I was on his “team”. It seems his team amounted to two people. Matt explained the system to me.

    “Once you’ve worked here a while you are promoted to team leader. At this point you build a team. You teach the team sales, help them along and make sure everyone is making money. Once you have a team of 8 people and two of your team members are leaders themselves you can open your own office. At that point the money comes rolling in.”

    The meeting ended and we were all given “field sheets”. This was the piece of paper that had all the information the houses we would be hitting. Matt and I hitched a ride with another “team” so we didn’t have to pay for the bus again. The energy in the car was insane, everyone was talking about sales and how they were going to make hundreds of dollars that day.

    We made it to the field and the day was similar to my “trial” day. Matt did most of the talking and even let me try pitching once. The words felt strange coming out my mouth, I wasn’t used to lying just to get a sale. I had the door slammed in my face and got slightly depressed. Matt told me not to worry about it, for every bad person you get one good person. I noticed that throughout the day Matt’s pitch got shorter and shorter. It was as if he was giving up. The energy of the morning meeting was starting to ware off as the reality of his job would set in.

    At the end of the day we had no sales. I had just worked a grueling 10 hours and would get nothing in exchange for you. Matt had a smile on but I could tell it was fake.

    At the end of the day we went back to the office and back into the meeting room. Matt pointed at a gong and bell in the corner. He said that if you make over a hundred dollars you get to ring the bell, if you make over 200 in a day you ring the gong. It took three sales to ring the bell, the amount Matt had told me was average. Of the forty people who walked into the room that night, only five or six rang the bell.

    I quit that night and walked home knowing I would still be poor, but at least I wouldn’t be lying for the money I made.

    That young salesman standing at your door with a huge smile has probably worked 9 hours that day, makes very little money and knows that the work he does is unappreciated.

  • Photography by Magnus Magnusson

    Magnus Magnusson is a photographer who specializes in fashion, portraits and still life. He has photographed the likes of Sam Rockwell, Leo Fitzpatrick, and more ranging from models, to bands, to actors, and actresses. Form the looks of his portfolio, Magnus does fashion really well, being able to bring the perfect mood and lighting to all his subjects.

    Continue reading for more images.



















  • Compared To Our Bailout, The Euro Bailout Is NOTHING

    In what is the clearest expression of the size of the European debt problem right now, Birinyi Associates have put together a display of U.S. private sector bailout debt compared to the problems of Greece, Ireland, and Spain.

    Spain is the only serious problem of the three, and explains why its condition is of special interest to markets right now.

    From Birinyi Associates:

    Click to see a larger, more detailed version of the chart:

    Birinyi Chart

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • How much has Tron evolved?

    Tron: Evolution, like many games of the season, is expected to make its appearance in the forthcoming E3 2010. Talking about the game through this interview is Game Director Darren Hedges, who tells us the little things

  • Obama: BP disaster tells us we must pass a “long-term energy strategy” – Reid: “This is an opportunity for us as a country to move away from fossil fuel, to do a better job of looking at renewable energies that are available to us all over this country.”

    “I said to the Republicans, join with me,” Obama said. “There’s been some good work done by John Kerry and Joe Lieberman and Lindsey Graham. Let’s go. Let’s not wait. Let’s show the American people that in the midst of this crisis, all of us are opening our eyes to what’s necessary to fulfill the promise to our children and our grandchildren.”

    Greenwire (subs. req’d) reports today on Obama’s remarks at an SF fundraiser for Sen. Boxer (D-CA) and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee.  Here’s more:

    “The fact of the matter is, is that not only do we have to revisit how these oil companies are operating … but we’ve also still got this overarching issue,” Obama said….

    “Even if you hadn’t seen the catastrophe down in the Gulf, the reason that folks are now having to go down a mile deep into the ocean, and then another mile drilling into the ground below, that is because the easy oil fields and oil wells are gone, or they’re starting to diminish.”

    He added, “That tells us that we’ve got to have a long-term energy strategy in this country. And we’ve got to start — we’ve got to start cultivating — we’ve got to start cultivating solar and wind and biodiesel. And we’ve got to increase energy efficiency across our economy in our buildings and our automobiles.”

    Obama spoke about the push for an energy and climate bill just hours after meeting with a skeptical Senate Republican conference on Capitol Hill where members — including Graham — urged him to pare back and try a less comprehensive approach because of uncertainties over the oil spill.

    Yes, Lindsey Graham, who has morphed from a bipartisan statesman to an incoherent pol mocked by his colleagues, has now become the incredible shrinking man, on his way to becoming a truly de minimis politician:

    “On energy and climate, the way you move forward is you have a comprehensive approach you can sell, and I don’t think many people believe that the oil spill has helped to get more voters on offshore drilling,” Graham told reporters after the meeting with Obama. “It’s made it a harder climb, so let’s do smaller versions of an energy, climate bill.”

    Let’s do a teeny-weeny, itsy-bitsy energy bill that just opens up the South Carolina coast to drilling — and only by BP — okay?

    Here, on the other hand, is the Senate majority leader today on the Senate floor:

    The bill can’t move forward without some Republican cosponsor.  Since that does not appear to be Graham ( though I would expect he’d vote for the final bill if it made it that far), and since Sen. Cantwell has given Sen. Collins (R-ME) all the cover she needs to abandon her long-standing commitment to climate action, that leaves Sen. Snowe (R-ME), who did not prove terribly reliable during the healthcare debate, but who certainly understands the threat of anthropogenic global warming.

    Sad, really, that this most modest, market-0riented climate bill, which would easily get 60 votes if Republicans were not hell-bent on denying Obama any victories that might show he is a bipartisan leader who can solve problems, may well wither on the vine.

    Related Post:

  • Baccalaureate service 2010


  • Both Parties See Immigration as Path to Victory in Arizona

    As The Washington Post’s Peter Slevin reported last week, GOP Senate hopeful J.D. Hayworth might be down in the polls, and he might have just a fifth of the campaign funds accumulated by his primary opponent, Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.). But following enactment of Arizona’s draconian new immigration law, the former congressman increasingly sees his hard line on immigration as the path toward victory in August:

    “If you enforce the law, people will obey the law,” Hayworth told the Thunder Mountain Republican Women, praising a strict new statute designed to curb illegal immigration. In a closely watched campaign increasingly defined by who can take the hardest line, Hayworth is a border hawk who called his book about immigration policy, “Whatever It Takes.”

    And the thought of a Hayworth upset has some Democratic strategists drooling — with good reason. An April poll has Democrat Rodney Glassman, a relatively unknown Tucson city councilman, leading Hayworth by three points in a hypothetical matchup. (By contrast, McCain leads Glassman by 16.)

    An internal polling memo out of Glassman’s office is hopeful that the anti-incumbency sentiment that uprooted GOP Sen. Robert Bennett in Utah will also extend to Arizona, noting the baggage Hayworth carries with him after a 12-year run in the House of Representative.

    Let’s not forget — Hayworth was named one of the most corrupt members of Congress [by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington] … and lost his Congressional seat in 2006 in large part due to his corrupt record and his dealings with convicted lobbyist Jack Abramoff.

    Still, to be taken at all seriously in this election, Glassman better start raising some cash. The $0 he had in his war chest at the end of March isn’t likely to go very far.