Category: News

  • Nokia teases a new Lumia Windows Phone, focuses on the camera

    Tomorrow, Nokia will host a press event in London, where the company says it will unveil “the next installment“. And, judging by a teaser released on Monday, it appears to be a new Lumia Window Phone. This comes just three days after the Finnish maker showcased the Lumia 928, which is coming exclusively to US mobile operator Verizon.

    The teaser, posted by Nokia’s UK arm on YouTube, reveals straight from its title — “The new Nokia Lumia is coming…” — that the company will announce a new Lumia device. Although there is no specific date provided (but when is there one with a teaser?), based on timing we can presume that the smartphone will be presented at tomorrow’s press event.

    The video shows a number of design cues, starting with the Nokia logo, the speaker grill on top and the front-facing camera to the right. There is also a silver-colored trim (on the side) and back panel covering the smartphone.

    The video, however, focuses mostly on the back-facing camera, which Nokia says is able to capture “more than your eyes can see”. The main shooter is surrounded by a bump in the back panel and dual flash lights positioned right below it.

    The bump around the back-facing camera suggests one of two things — either the device is thinner than the shooter allows in order to sit flush with the case or there is actually a bigger sensor than the handset can handle without getting too thick.

  • What’s Lost When Shareholders Rule

    The form of capitalism that has emerged in Britain is the textbook description of how to organize capital markets and corporate sectors. It features dispersed shareholders with powers to elect directors and remove them with or without cause, large stock markets, active markets for corporate control, a good legal system, strong investor protection, a rigorous anti-trust authority — the list goes on.

    It is what many countries around the world aspire to, what economists recommend, and what international agencies such as the IMF and World Bank encourage developing and emerging economies around the world to adopt. Even in the U.S., which is by global standards pretty close to the textbook, would-be reformers often cite the British example (on shareholder input into executive pay, for example, or the ease of hostile takeovers) as something to strive toward.

    Against this background it is surprising to observe how mediocre the performance of the British economy has been, and how dissatisfied much of its population is with its economic and social conditions. Its large scale manufacturing firms have been decimated, it has endured decades of underinvestment and a banking system that does not fund its small and medium sized enterprises properly, and it is heavily dependent on a financial sector that displayed some of the worst failures of any country during the financial crisis.

    It is as if the most ardent followers of lifestyle, nutrition, and well-being prescriptions suffer the most chronic symptoms of ill health and depression. And it is as if, in response, we encourage them to follow those recommendations even more closely and not allow them for one moment to question the infallible judgment of the experts. They should, in other words, flog themselves until they feel better.

    What exactly is wrong with the progressively greater control that banks, private equity investors, stock markets, and takeovers have exerted over the British corporate sector? They are perfectly within their rights to penalize, remove, and dismiss at a moment’s notice anyone who does not perform to the highest standards. Indeed if they do not do this they are abdicating their responsibilities as financiers, property owners, and guardians of corporate assets to ensure that their money, property, and assets are deployed in the very best way. Controlling corporations is their job.

    The downside, though, is that exemplary as a form of control the British financial system might be, it systematically extinguishes any sense of commitment — of investors to companies, of executives to employees, of employees to firms, of firms to their investors, of firms to communities, or of this generation to any subsequent or past one. It is a transactional island in which you are as good as your last deal, as farsighted as the next deal, admired for what you can get away with, and condemned for what you confess.

    While incentives and control are center-stage in conventional economics, commitment is not. Enhancing choice, competition, and liquidity is the economist’s prescription for improving social welfare, and legal contracts, competition policy, and regulation are the toolkit for achieving it. Eliminate restrictions on consumers’ freedom to choose, firms’ ability to compete, and financial markets’ provision of liquidity and we can all move closer to economic nirvana.

    What economics does not recognize is the fundamental role of commitment in all aspects of our commercial as well as social lives, and the way in which institutions contribute to the creation and preservation of commitment. It does not appreciate the full manner in which choice, competition, and liquidity undermine commitment or the fact that institutions are not simply mechanisms for reducing costs of transactions, but on the contrary means to establish and enhance commitment at the expense of choice, competition, and liquidity. Commitment is the subject of soft sentimental sociologists, not of realistic rational economists.

    Where economics errs is in failing to recognize our dependence on others to assist us, and the dependence of their willingness to do so on our commitment to them. It is not that contracts could not be written or terms of our mutual assistance agreed, it is simply that if we are not committed to abide by them, they are of no significance. My trust in you derives not from the piece of paper that I hold in my hand but from the sacrifice that I see you making on my behalf. What will you forgo if you deceive me; what will I endure from abusing your confidence? What is the capital that we have both invested to secure the relationship and without which no price, contract, incentive, or punishment is of any significance? How durable is your commitment in the face of adversity — is it resilient in difficult times or vulnerable to alternative temptations? Commitment has substance. I can measure the volume of it from the depth of capital committed, the length of time for which it is committed, and the breadth of activities to which it applies. A large amount of capital that can be withdrawn instantaneously is of little value.

    Corporations are, as the economists depict them, instruments of control. But they are also commitment devices. In the form of corporate capitalism that has evolved in the UK — and, to a lesser extent, the U.S. — shareholder power makes true commitment extremely difficult. Corporations, and economic well-being, have suffered as a result.

    This is adapted from Firm Commitment: Why the Corporation is Failing Us and How to Restore Trust in It (Oxford University Press, 2013).

  • Beaten With Skateboards: Man In Critical Condition

    A man in Huntington Beach, California is in critical condition today after being mercilessly beaten by a group of teens.

    The man intervened after his girlfriend tried to break up a fight between the teens and they turned on her. Authorities say he was chased to a nearby laundry, where the group beat him with skateboards. Four suspects were arrested on charges of attempted murder; all of them were juveniles who were already on probation for other offenses.

    The 25-year old victim is said to be undergoing surgery for his injuries; witnesses say the beating was intense.

    “I was so scared, so I locked the door. They used their skateboards to beat the boy in the head,” said Sandy Nguyen, who works at a nail salon near the laundry.

    The victim’s identity is not being released at this time due to an ongoing investigation; police say there may be more arrests this week.

  • Casino Royale Gets an Awesome Lego Recreation [VIDEO]

    Would you like to see a painstaking Lego recreation of the opening scene from the 2006 hit Casino Royale? Well, of course you would. Lucky for you, it now exists.

    For comparison:

    [Bricktease]

  • $120 Egg Sandwich Offered at Sydney Restaurant

    An egg sandwich would rank pretty low in an ordered list of expensive sandwiches. One restaurant, however, has found a way to raise the price of an egg sandwich to over $100.

    According to a report in The Sunday Telegraph, a Sydney, Australia restaurant called 4Fourteen this week will be selling a $120 egg sandwich. It contains Australian bacon, a duck egg fried in truffle butter, roasted foie gras, aged cheddar, shaved truffle, semi-dried smoked gourmet truss tomato, and a crème fraîche and caviar dressing, all on a brioche roll.

    The sandwich will be available only during this week. The sandwich was unveiled at a breakfast Monday morning at 4Fourteen, hosted by Australian celebrity chef and 4Fourteen owner Colin Fassnidge. A 4Fourteen chef named Carla Jones told the Telegraph that she expects people to order the sandwich out of curiosity, though she might not eat it herself because she is “not that into truffles.”

    The egg sandwich is actually part of “Bacon Week” – a celebration of Australian pork. Events promoting locally-produced pork will be held throughout Australia this week. The organization Australian Pork Limited (APL) has issued a challenge to other Australian chefs to create a bacon and egg roll to rival 4Fourteen’s.

  • O.J. Simpson Isn’t The Only O.J. Buzzing On Twitter (And No, It’s Not O.J. Mayo)

    OJ Simpson is plastered all over the news media as he appears back in court. The ex-NFL player turned actor, turned murder suspect, is seeking to have a robbery conviction thrown out.

    Heading to Twitter to see what people were saying about it, I searched for “OJ” on Twitter expecting a flood of commentary about the ordeal. To my surprise, there seems to be about as many people talking about orange juice as there are O.J. Simpson (though there are a lot of “who cares about OJ Simpson?” kinds of tweets coming out).

    You can be certain, however, that a lot of people still care about Orange Juice. Good news for orange farmers.

    I’m not sure if this one is about juice or about Simpson:

    Sure, people talking about orange juice on Twitter is not the most interesting thing in the world, but it’s mildly interesting to see how rapidly tweets can roll in about any random topics – not just trending topics. Note how close together these orange juice tweets are, and they only make a small sample. It really illustrates just how much of a pulse Twitter really has on what people are saying and doing all over the world. I mean, just look at what it’s been able to do to map the use of hateful words across the U.S.

  • Nokia Lumia 925 image leaks ahead of tomorrow’s press conference

    Nokia Lumia 925 Photos
    An image of the unannounced Nokia Lumia 925 smartphone has leaked ahead of the device’s official debut, which is expected to take place during Nokia’s press conference on Tuesday. Twitter user @evleaks posted the image on Tuesday morning, and he has a very good track record when publishing photos of unannounced smartphones. Few details surrounding the Lumia 925 can be gleaned from the leaked image — the device obviously features the Windows Phone OS, and it also has a shape that appears to vary slightly from other recent Nokia smartphones. Nokia is expected to unveil the device on Tuesday morning during a press conference in London but in the meantime, the leaked image follows below.

    Continue reading…

  • Report: Bloom Energy raises another $130M

    Silicon Valley fuel cell startup Bloom Energy has raised another $130 million in funding, according to Fortune’s Dan Primack. The latest funding means that Bloom Energy has closed on over $1.1 billion in venture capital funding over its eleven-year lifetime.

    There’s a few things you need to remember about Bloom Energy. First, manufacturing fuel cells is a very difficult business, and one that is capital intensive with low margins. Fuel cells take fuel (natural gas or biogas) and combine it with oxygen and other chemicals to create an electrochemical reaction that produces electricity.

    Behind the scenes with Bloom Energy's new fuel cell thumbnail

    Customers can buy several Bloom Energy servers to deliver distributed power on site at a building, and that can have a lower carbon footprint than grid power. Competitors include ClearEdge Power, which recently scored a deal with Verizon, and the publicly-traded FuelCell Energy.

    But Bloom Energy has actually gotten some breakthrough traction in the market over the past couple of years, particularly with data center operators. Apple, eBay, AT&T, Adobe, Google and others have bought Bloom fuel cells (or the power from the fuel cells) for both their data centers and building operations.

    Primack reports that Bloom Energy’s latest funding was an extension of a round raised in 2011, at a pre-money valuation of $2.7 billion. The lead investor that put in $100 million wasn’t named, but Primack says that Credit Suisse put in $30 million of the round.

    Bloom Energy News: CA Regulators Approve Utility Fuel Cell Projects

    Because the fuel cell business is so difficult (read my The pain point for Bloom Energy and other fuel cell makers), Bloom Energy is most likely not profitable even after 11 years. Bloom Energy CFO Bill Kurtz told me that the company was “half way to break even” in the Summer of 2012. Primack previously reported that Bloom’s retained earnings through Q3 2012 stood at negative $873 million, with $113 million left in the bank, and with positive gross margins on a pro forma basis. Bloom has a goal to be profitable in 2013.

    Existing investors did not participate in the round, according to the report. Previous investors included Kleiner Perkins, NEA, DAG Ventures and GSV Capital. Bloom Energy was previously working with broker Advanced Equities (like on this round in the Summer of 2012) to raise funds, but Advanced Equities has since shut down. The broker was charged for misleading investors back in 2009 for fund raising for Bloom Energy, was fined and shut its offices.

    We’ll be interviewing Bloom Energy’s VP Mission Critical Systems, Peter Gross, and eBay’s VP, Global Foundation Services, Dean Nelson, at Structure in San Francisco next month.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • News story: Statement on PM phone call with Nawaz Sharif

    A Downing St spokesperson said:

    The Prime Minister spoke to Nawaz Sharif earlier today to congratulate him on his party’s success in the recent Pakistani elections.

    The Prime Minister and Nawaz Sharif agreed that the strong bond between the UK and Pakistan was a huge asset and that they would work together to strengthen the relationship further. The Prime Minister welcomed Nawaz Sharif’s commitment to prioritise economic reforms.

    The two leaders also agreed on their shared commitment to the trilateral process and its importance in achieving peace in Afghanistan and the wider region.

  • Congress To Hold Hearing On Google’s Driverless Cars This Week

    Driverless cars have some people spooked, but most are incredibly supportive of anything that makes the roads safer. Congress wants to make sure of that with a hearing scheduled for this week.

    The Hill reports that the Senate Commerce Committee will be holding a hearing on driverless cars on Wednesday to take a look at all of the issues currently surrounding the technology. The hearing will touch upon safety benefits, the risks associated with driverless cars, and what impact, if any, legalizing driverless cars will have on current policies.

    Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller told the Hill that the hearing will focus on making sure driverless cares are safe:

    “It’s vital that Congress understand the safety benefits, but we must make sure that these systems are reliable and secure, and don’t add to the numerous distractions already in cars. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration also must have the capabilities to oversee the safety of new vehicle technology.”

    Driverless cars won’t be the only technology brought up either. The Committee will take a look at the recent trend of smartphone integration into vehicles. Some are concerned that having access to Pandora and other smartphone apps in cars will lead to more distracted driving – an already dangerous habit of many American drivers.

    There’s no word yet on who’s going to be represented at the hearing, but it’s a good bet that somebody from Google’s driverless car program will be present. The company has been investing quite a bit into the technology over the past few years, and has even managed to legalize the cars in California, Nevada, Florida and Texas. It would appear that Congress wants to ascertain the safety of the vehicles before they become legal in more states.

    We can only hope that somebody will bring up Google’s almost spotless track record during the hearing. The cars have driven over a collective 300,000 miles, and have only been involved in two accidents. Furthermore, those two accidents were caused when human control was introduced.

  • eBay Deal of the Week: 1979 Pontiac Trans Am

    1979PontiacTransAm_5

    Stunning silver paint, T-tops, turbo style wheels, and a big screaming chicken on the hood. These were the basic elements of the 10th Anniversary 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. This is about as “in your face” as an American car could get in 1979. The second generation Trans Am, made famous by movies like “Cannonball” and “Smokey and the Bandit” is one of those rare cars that adolescent dreams were made of. Power came from a 400 cubic-inch V8 that was coupled to a 4-Speed transmission. With 220 hp and 320 lb-ft of torque this was no stump puller, however they did handle well if equipped with the WS6 suspension package. The one you are viewing here has a mere 11,500 miles on the clock from new and comes with a very high “Buy it Now” price tag of $43,995.00. If however you’re looking to relive some of your old glory days from the 1970′s, well then, this may just be the best chance you’re ever going to get. Click through for more pics or go directly to the eBay ad below.

    Source: eBaymotors.com

    1979PontiacTransAm_4

    1979PontiacTransAm_3

    1979PontiacTransAm_2

    1979PontiacTransAm_1

    1979 Pontiac Trans Am

  • Bringing data to DC: Q&A with health data’s biggest evangelist HHS CTO Bryan Sivak

    Bryan Sivak has lived the Silicon Valley dream — in the last 15 years, he co-founded two startups, one of which was acquired by Oracle two years ago. But instead of sticking around to start another company or taking the venture capital route, he wound up across the country in the center of government.

    After holding chief technology positions with the District of Columbia and the State of Maryland, last year he was appointed Chief Technology Officer for the Department of Health and Human Services. Ahead of a trip back West, Sivak talked with me about how open data (an increasingly hot topic in government) can drive big changes in health care, where digital health is evolving and why entrepreneurs should give DC a try. Take a look at a (lightly edited) transcript of our chat.

    GigaOM: You went from fast-paced Silicon Valley to bureaucratic Washington, DC, what was the biggest adjustment challenge?  

    Sivak: The most disconcerting thing, at first, is that because you’re working for an entity that is essentially operating on behalf of the taxpayer, there is this constant spotlight shining on the work that you do. I don’t think that’s a bad thing at all. In fact, I think it’s great — it’s the reason that, I think, I and a lot of other people actually do it. But you very quickly get used to it — you just kind of take it in stride.

    capitolGigaOM: At the SXSW Interactive conference you talked about how government can learn “Lean Startup” principles and other Valley-style ways of thinking. What can the Valley learn from DC?

    Sivak: I’m a big fan of disruption and bending or breaking the rules to do interesting things. But, at the same time, I think it’s important to realize that there are some rules that are there for a reason and, in many cases, disruption needs a partner called sustainability. I exist in this massive agency right now — 90,000 people work for HHS — and while I’d love to activate the potential of every person there, it’s important to recognize that there are people who are well-suited and who actually should be working on the sustainability aspect … keeping the trains on time and that sort of stuff.  That’s something that’s often overlooked by people who come to it strictly from the Valley mindset.

    GigaOM: You’re speaking to a group of entrepreneurs, programmers and designers at the Health Refactored conference [this] week about innovation in health care. HHS has put a lot of effort into opening up health data – which is obviously an important first step – but what else needs to happen to spur innovation?

    Sivak: It’s a massively complex ecosystem and environment. [And] one of the things we can do as experts in this area and the government is help by educating people, by doing a better job of describing our data sets, by doing a better job or doing a job or basically explaining the problems that we have and the problems that we want to see solved. There are millions of examples out there of things that can be worked out but people just don’t know there are problems and don’t know it’s something that should be worked on. And that’s a place we can help.

    GigaOM: It’s barely a year into your tenure at HHS. But when you look at where we need to go, how far along are we on the progress bar?

    Sivak: We’re just at the very tip of the iceberg here. We’ve been working on this for a few years now, long before I got there. My predecessor Todd Park, now the CTO of the United States, kicked off the idea of the data that HHS has as being critical to revolutionizing the system. A few years ago, we started the process of data liberation — changing the default setting from closed to open within the department. That’s been the big focus and I think we’ve been successful with that but there are still pockets of resistance where people just don’t really understand what the value is and there are other complications, such as privacy restrictions and things we have to take very seriously.

    GigaOM: What has to happen next?

    Sivak: There are two other phases we have to start working on. The first one is around dissemination of that data – we have a website called healthdata.gov and it’s the one-stop shop for HHS data. To date, we’ve probably catalogued 40 percent of the data sets that exist at HHS, about 400+ data sets, and a much smaller number, 34 or so, have APIs attached to them. There’s still work to be done of the dissemination side, and that also includes some questions we’re wrestling with now. For example, an important feature should be an area where people can come and collaborate and discuss and ask questions and get answers. And we’re trying to decide whether that kind of forum should happen on our government website or on a third-party website that’s charged with potentially building that community.

    The [other] piece is data education – explaining data better, teaching people how to work with the data in a better way and connecting people with experts in a relatively regular fashion so they can get answers to their questions, understand the best ways to use the data, etc.

    Fitbit, mobile healthGigaOM: Judging by booming investment, accelerator programs, startup launches, and other activity in the sector, digital health seems to be seeing a lot of innovation, but what kinds of innovation do you think are missing?

    Sivak: The beauty of it is that it’s a massive industry and there’s so much room for people to innovate it’s insane. Some areas that I’m personally interested in and I think are interesting to the department, off the top of my head: there are tons of people running around right now with devices generating personal health-related data from Jawbones, Fitbits (see disclosure), mobile phones that capture stuff, you name it. But that data, right now, is very inactionable. There’s no advice, no pro-active suggestions, none of that – that’s one big area.

    And integrating that personal health-generated data with clinical data, i.e. the stuff that your doctor generates, is massively interesting. Imagine that you have some kind of chronic condition, like diabetes, wouldn’t it be interesting if you stepped on a scale every morning or took your blood glucose everyday and that got automatically transmitted to your doctor? And the system that your doctor has in his or her office alerts him or her if you have some kind of a problem or if your stats are going in the wrong direction, so they can intervene early? I think that’s a massive area.

    Also, nobody has figured out patient engagement yet. And there are some people out there, myself included, who believe that the patient is the single untapped resource in healthcare right now.

    GigaOM: How can open data help support health reform and Obamacare?

    Sivak: Data is one of the absolutely critical components to reforming our health care system. The big challenge with our system today is we exist in this transactional, fee-for-service environment. When you see your doctor see you in [her] office or he or she performs a procedure or test, they get paid for those things. The problem with that is the incentives are somewhat backward – it incentivizes transactions. It incentivizes people to go in to be treated when they’re sick, as opposed to being kept healthy. In order to fix it, we have to move to a system where we pay for value and outcomes.

    In order to do that, we need the data. If we don’t have the data in terms of what happens when somebody gets treated with a certain drug or what kind of drug interactions exist or how effective a specific treatment is, then we’re never going to be able to incentivize the providers to do the right thing, And if you’re a provide or a doctor you’re not going to be able to figure out what the right thing to do is. Liberating this data is incredibly important to fixing the system.

    health data visualizationGigaOM: Every though there’s been a lot of buzz about the Affordable Care Act, there’s still a lot of ignorance out there. A recent survey found that 42 percent of people polled didn’t even know it’s a law. How can data help people understand health reform?

    Sivak: What that [survey] indicates is that we need to do a much better job talking about it and marketing the value of it. I think the way we can do that is through interesting and creative uses of the data. People don’t remember statistics… but when you tell the stories with the data, that’s what they start to remember. I heard a great quote the other day, which is perfect for this: the singular of data is anecdote. That’s what we have to get to if we want to sell the value of this thing.

    GigaOM: What are some of the most interesting or promising uses of the data you’ve seen so far? 

    Sivak: For the first time [last week], we released [hospital pricing data] in an easy-to-access public format. [It’s] the actual prices that hospitals charge Medicare for the top 100 procedures across the country and [it shows] that the prices that hospitals charge, even when they’re right next to each other are wildly different. It’s crazy. But here’s a fun little statistic: in the first day that this data set was available online, we had 110,000 downloads.

    Another one of my favorite examples is what [healthcare data journalist] Fred Trotter is doing. I love [it], not necessarily because the work that he’s doing to build this social graph of doctors will determine anything interesting, but the fact that he had this idea. That he’s not a medical professional or a subject matter expert and he had this idea to take these two random numbers in a claim and use them for something that could potentially be interesting is what I think is incredibly indicative of the power of the stuff and bringing people in who are not subject matter experts.

    GigaOM: You’re not just trying to convince entrepreneurs in the Valley and elsewhere to work on digital health, you’re trying to recruit them to work in government (at least temporarily).  What does DC offer that the Valley can’t?

    Sivak: This is actually a very simple answer: because we can give you the opportunity to solve, literally, the most pressing problem in American society today.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Kindle Fire Gets Amazon Coins, Amazon’s Virtual Currency

    Back in February, Amazon announced that Amazon Coins, its new virtual currency, would be coming to Kindle Fire devices in May. It’s May, and today, the company announced that the currency is now available.

    Customers can now start using the currency in any app from the Amazon Appstore.

    To celebrate, the company is giving away 500 free coins to all Kindle Fire customers in the U.S. This is the equivalent of $5. The coins are being automatically deposited in users’ accounts.

    “Today we are giving Kindle Fire owners $5 worth of Coins to spend on new apps and games, or to purchase in-app items, such as recipes in iCookbook, song collections in SongPop or mighty falcon bundles in Angry Birds Star Wars. And with discounts of up to 10% when you buy Coins, this is a great way for customers to save money when they buy apps, games and in-app items,” said Mike George, Vice President of Apps and Games at Amazon. “We will continue to add more ways to earn and spend Coins on a wider range of content and activities—today is Day One for Coins.”

    Developers will continue to earn the standard 70% revenue share, and Amazon will continue to support real currency as well. Amazon is encouraging the use of Amazon Coins, however, by letting customers get discounts of up to 10%.

  • As NASDAQ rallies, smartphone sector has been a crushing disappointment

    NASDAQ Smartphone Market Comparison
    Over the last 12 months, the NASDAQ has moved up by 17%, a respectable performance. However, most of the best-known hedge funds in the world continue lagging both NASDAQ and the broader S&P index woefully. The smartest investors in the world are having trouble matching index funds in both 2012 and 2013. Probably the biggest reason for this is the way smartphone-related stocks have underperformed. This was something that was extremely difficult to predict in early 2012. Not only has Apple tanked over the past year but other hedge fund darlings have also lagged behind NASDAQ: Omnivision, the camera module champion, is down 16% in a year and Qualcomm, the key phone chip vendor, is up by only 4%.

    Continue reading…

  • iTunes’ recent growth shows content could be a big business for Apple

    For a nice visual aid of how Apple’s iTunes content business is doing, the Asymco blog has done a great job chart-ifying the company’s most recent earnings results.

    The charts show how iTunes content revenue has been steadily growing upward and to the right. But they also show that Apple saw an increase in iTunes net sales by $300 million just from the holiday quarter (when Apple always sees its biggest concentrated pop in downloads) to the March quarter, making $2.4 billion in sales. This is also up from $1.9 billion during the same quarter a year ago.

    Relatively, this is still very tiny compared to the $23 billion in net sales Apple derived from its most essential business, the iPhone. And to the $8.7 billion from the iPad last quarter. But iTunes alone is close to half of Mac net sales, which were $5.4 billion.

    The reason for the increase is mostly due to Apple’s steady expansion of the iTunes Store to new countries around the world in recent quarters. iTunes Music sells in 119 countries, videos in 109 countries, while the App Store and iBookstore are both in 155 countries.

    According to Asymco’s calculations, this wider availability in the store has driven up the amount the average user is paying Apple for content:

    In March Apple reported that they have 500 million iTunes [users] so one way to think about the iTunes business is to say that  iTunes users purchase content and services at the rate of about $40 per year.

    This is really interesting in the context of the long-rumored Apple video subscription deal and the still-being-hashed-out “iRadio” service for subscription music content. Imagine if just in just some of those countries Apple introduced a $10 per month streaming solution. So instead of $40 per year from a user, Apple started getting more like $120 per year. And that would be just music. If there was a separate video package some day that figure would get even larger. Plus, that doesn’t include money spent on and within both Apple’s own iOS and Mac apps and third-party apps.

    iTunes has always been more of a bonus source of revenue than a meaningful contributor to Apple’s bottom line — the songs were originally there to sell iPods, in the way mobile apps are there to sell iOS devices. But software and services — from iCloud and Maps to Siri — have begun to play a more prominent role at Apple, and in its customers’ experiences. A subscription service of digital content, if deployed and priced correctly, could actually turn into a meaningful new source of revenue for Apple.

    If current trends continue, with software and content sales going up and laptop and desktop sales dropping off, it’s not impossible that Apple’s content business could someday soon outpace the Mac segment as its third-largest business.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Sony’s water-resistant Xperia ZR shows why now is a great time for Android hardware

    Has there ever been a better time to choose among the newest Android handsets? I think not. Yes, there have been several standouts from different manufacturers over the past few years, but the stars are aligning — or maybe it’s just the competition heating up — to raise the bar for many of the major Android phone makers.

    Take the new Sony Xperia ZR, for example, which is a smaller version of the company’s flagship Xperia Z. This 4.6-inch 720p device is not only safe from accidental drops in water, but it can be used to capture full HD video while submerged. Don’t get all Jacques Cousteau with it though: The Xperia ZR is only rated for depths of 1.5 meters for up to 30 minutes. Still, it’s an amazing design feature and shows just how far smartphone hardware is maturing in general.

    The current market isn’t just about features though. Nearly every flagship phone released this year to date shares most, if not all of the same hardware components. With 1080p displays, Qualcomm Snapdragon S600 processors, and the latest wireless technologies supported, purchasing choices could be influenced more by phone design. Sure, there are also Android skins and services to consider, but I can’t think of any time in history when nearly every flagship phone had such smart design.

    HTC OneTake the HTC One, for example. With it’s curved metal body and super build quality, it’s a sure standout from the many plastic phones on the market. My colleague, Om Malik — an iPhone user that never met an Android phone he liked — actually for the first time considered buying Android phone after seeing the One. (Don’t worry Apple fans, Om hasn’t defected: He still doesn’t own an Android!).

    Need more examples? Sony’s Xperia Z — the big brother of the new ZR — is stunning as well with a 5-inch full HD screen and no hardware buttons on the front face. The side-mounted power button is a design stand-out as is the 7.9 millimeter thinness. It too impressed Om.

    Samsung’s new Galaxy S 4 is arguably a hardware let-down for many, yet it still impresses me that the company could cram a larger, high-resolution panel in a phone that looks like the Galaxy S 3, but is essentially a smaller device. LG’s Optimus G Pro shares similar features and components with all of the above yet feels and looks like a much-improved Galaxy Note 2. All of these are light-years better than my original ugly duckling — the Nexus One — when it comes to design.

    I’m not suggesting that any of these phones is “best” or that you should opt for a flagship device over a lower-priced smartphone. Instead, my point is this: With so few top-tier hardware component suppliers, most high-end handsets share a similar feature-set. There may be subtle differences — which has a better camera sensor or maybe support for that new 802.11ac Wi-Fi — but most of these phones offer similar experiences.

    Up to this point, hardware makers put more effort to differentiate with Android skins, services or other software functions. These days, design is becoming more prominent. For consumers looking for their next flagship Android phone, that’s a great problem to have.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Dear Samsung, please stop making stuff up about 5G

    On Monday, Samsung made a big news splash with the revelation it has successfully tested a “5G” network in its labs, delivering a 1 Gbps connection over airwaves that were previously useless for mobile communications.

    From what few details Samsung has released about the tests, the feat sounds impressive, and its adaptive array transceiver technology could very well make it into the future networks we’ll one day call 5G. But for Samsung to call its technology 5G today is very disingenuous. Quite frankly a huge global vendor vendor and researcher like Samsung should know better than to play so fast and loose with media and technology perceptions. Samsung is grubbing for headlines, and it appears to have succeeded. A search of Google News for “Samsung” and “5G” yielded 97 separate stories.

    The fact is, 5G only exists as barest concept today. Groups like METIS have just started investigating the technologies and network architectures that will comprise 5G networks a decade down the road. There is certainly no standards-based definition of 5G, and anyone who claims other is frankly making crap up.

    Yet we’ve been witnessing a growing number of companies and tech media outlets start tossing the term 5G about, just as we saw the industry warp the definition of 4G years ago and are seeing carriers abuse the term LTE-Advanced today. Samsung certainly isn’t the first or worst offender. Broadcom attached the term 5G to its 802.11ac Wi-Fi gear — which isn’t even a mobile cellular technology – over a year ago. But Samsung and the rest of the industry aren’t doing anyone any favors by adding to the confusion.

    Samsung 5G testsThat said, Samsung appears to have done something impressive in these tests. Packing 1 Gbps into a millimeter-wave transmission (A minor technical point: Samsung calls it millimeter, but the 28 GHz Ka-band frequencies it uses straddles the millimeter and microwave bands) is nothing new. Backhaul specialists for years have been cramming loads of capacity into broad swathes of high-frequency spectrum. The problem is those frequencies have been useless for mobile communications because they have no range. Shorter wavelengths can’t propagate at the power levels used for cellular transmission.

    Samsung, however, seems to have solved that problem by using a boatload of antennas – 64 to be exact. It’s the same principle behind the MIMO antennas used in our Wi-Fi routers and LTE phones: if instead of a single high-powered transmission, you send several low-power transmissions that reinforce one another, your signal will propagate farther. Samsung claims that by using this technique it’s produced a link in the 28 GHz band that can travel 2 km and deliver a connection speed of just over 1 Gbps.

    If Samsung and the mobile industry can commercialize this technology for cellular, it could open up whole new hunks of spectrum for wide area network use. There are plenty of obstacles to making such technology viable, not the least of which is shoving 64 antennas into a mobile phone, but it’s a start.

    So kudos to Samsung for pushing the bounds of wireless technology, but shame on Samsung for conflating that accomplishment with its ridiculous pretensions to 5G. “Adaptive array transceiver” may not have the same ring on a press release as “5G”, but at least it’s honest.

    Pinocchio image courtesy of Shutterstock user neven

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.

        

  • Thoughts from a twentysomething on Meg Jay’s talk on twentysomethings

    Meg-Jay-at-TED2013

    Meg Jay gave a talk at TED2013 suggesting that the 20s are a person’s defining decade — and it started a heated debate at the office. Here, a 20-something responds. Photo: James Duncan Davidson

    I’m 24 and a woman, and that makes me a target for a lot of speculation and life advice. Sheryl Sandberg wants me to lean in to become a woman leader; Anne-Marie Slaughter says my lady parts may doom me to a half-fulfilled life; Susan Patton thinks I should have spent my time at Princeton looking for a husband (ideally one of her sons); and in TIME Magazine’s most recent cover story, Joel Stein suggests that I’m narcissistic and dying to be famous. Everyone’s talking about me.

    And people wonder why millennials are so self-involved.

    Meg Jay: Why 30 is not the new 20Meg Jay: Why 30 is not the new 20Now I can add clinical psychologist Meg Jay, today’s talk, to the list of well-intentioned non-millennial millennial critics. Jay spoke at TED2013 — and emphatically stated that “30 is not the new 20.” She urges twentysomethings to rid themselves of the idea that their 20s are a prolonged adolescence, throwaway years. According to Jay, 80 percent of life’s defining moments happen by the time a person is 35. Powerful — and intimidating — words.

    To be honest: When I first heard the talk, I was appalled. It wasn’t a message I wanted my peers to hear: it put pressure on an already overstimulated generation to find the right career and start thinking about marriage now. And it seemed to simultaneously berate thirtysomethings, telling them their most important years were over and it was too late to get what they wanted.

    In her book, The Defining Decade: Why Your Twenties Matter – and How to Make the Most of Them Now, Jay addresses a lot of the eyebrow-raisers she couldn’t in her 14-minute talk. As anybody who has given a TED or TEDx Talk knows: Boiling years of work down to 18 minutes is a terrifying honor. While the format makes for a good introduction to a new idea, the nuance and detail can be lost in the condensation. The heteronormative lifestyle Jay seems to take for granted in her talk is subdued in her book, which actually dedicates its first 30 percent to work. And the book very quickly establishes a critical condition that’s taken for an assumption in her talk: That her advice is geared toward people who choose to list marriage and/or children in their life goals.

    In her book, Jay includes personal experiences and reflections that help to soften what could otherwise seem like a condescending stance. She writes, “Like many twentysomethings, I wanted to establish my career before I had kids, and I did. I waddled across the stage to collect my Ph.D. diploma while eight months pregnant with baby number one.” By the time she had her second child Jay had a university job. But she writes, “Having two babies after thirty-five did not go quite as smoothly as I expected, and now I see how lucky I was. Many women are not as fortunate.” Jay wants twentysomething readers to avoid some of the same mistakes she feels she might have made.

    If you are in your 20s and marriage and/or children are things you desire, Jay has a lot to say on the matter. She opposes the media’s portrayal of American twentysomethings as a “culture dominated by singles who are almost obsessed with avoiding commitment.” She writes, “I have yet to meet a twentysomething who doesn’t want to get married or at least find a committed relationship.” The anecdote doesn’t convince me, but Jay’s argument that postponing marriage just for the sake of it is a reasonable one. Just because people get married later doesn’t mean that, a priori, later is better. And that also doesn’t mean twentysomethings should be content to date and cohabitate for years with people they know they won’t end up with. At least thinking about the qualities you want in a long-term partner while you’re in your twenties, says Jay, can help prevent what she sees often in her practice: people who rush into marriage when they turn thirty because it’s suddenly the time to care. Basically: Start worrying in your twenties, and you might not feel as screwed in your thirties.

    Twentysomething women trying to figure out how to have it all will have to look elsewhere. In her chapters on work and love, Jay doesn’t address the critical relationship between the two — and more important, how one might hinder the other. She doesn’t recognize that for an ambitious twentysomething, there simply might not be enough hours in the day to further a career and work on finding the perfect mate.

    Ultimately, Jay’s goal is to create a sense of urgency for twentysomethings so they don’t end up in their 30s feeling like they wasted the past ten years — and to provide tools to deal with this proverbial fire under the butt. As she told me, “I’m being sincere when I say there’s nothing worse than sitting across from a 35-year-old who’s realizing they’re never going to get the life they want, and that’s sad. Creating urgency for twentysomethings is okay.” But how this helps anyone over thirty is less clear.

    Indeed, Jay’s book could be a pretty depressing read for thirtysomethings who haven’t been powerwalking through their 20s. It might also add more pressure to twentysomethings who are being told from every angle what their generation could be doing better. It’s nice to imagine a bunch of Gen X’ers sitting around nodding their heads saying “Yes, yes, yes I wish I had heard this when I was 20. Onward, millennials! Succeed where we failed!” Certainly these people exist, as evidenced by the deluge of Gen X advice to young poets (Jay, Sandberg, Slaughter and Stein are all Gen X’ers); but what’s much more likely is a bunch of thirtysomething women tearing their hair out when they are told that being the first real beneficiaries of feminism and birth control has doomed them to spinsterhood.

    And finally: What about youth? If your 20s is not the time to have fun, when is? As Jay says in her talk, “I’m not discounting twentysomething exploration here, but I am discounting exploration that’s not supposed to count. Which by the way, is not exploration. That’s procrastination.”

    I’m not going to upend modern philosophical thought when I say: Not all experiences need a focus, and not everything that counts can be counted. While I had hoped that Jay’s final chapter, “The Brain and the Body,” would focus on the sort of “capital” that doesn’t belong on a work or relationship résumé, it turned out to be further reading on my developing adult brain and my rapidly deteriorating eggs. Adults need to play, too.

    When I asked Jay about “fun,” she said “there should be fun all throughout your life. Twentysomethings shouldn’t feel this pressure to live their life like an eternal spring break — because how can it, when you’re working and you don’t have money and you don’t know whether you’re going to get a text back from the person you like? It’s actually a very stressful time.” Agreed, but — as you get older — spring break gets harder and harder to schedule. While Jay finds it hard to see what is fun about scrambling for the L train at 4 am after too much Scotch, it’s hard for me to imagine what’s fun about owning a home and having two kids. And, yes, I know that’s in part because I’m in my twenties.

    If my father’s house had a mantra, it would be “Life is long.” I was infused with the belief that I could do anything I wanted, at any age. No one likes thinking about life as a series of limitations, and certainly no woman likes to think of herself as a ticking time bomb. But Jay is right when she says we all have to face certain realities: Time runs out. Which is why I am also completely on board with Jay’s own mantra: Be intentional. Because while we may have different ideas on how to live the good life, Jay and I can agree that the intention of living it should be realized early and often.

  • Rumor: AT&T To Discontinue The HTC First Facebook Phone

    htc-first-slide-01

    HTC’s Facebook Home-laden First smartphone may only have debuted on AT&T last month, but it appears that the device may be a dud as far as consumers are concerned. According to a report from BGR’s Zach Epstein, sales of the HTC First smartphone have been so disappointing that AT&T will soon be dropping the device from its lineup completely and shipping all unsold inventory back to HTC.

    If this report holds true (representatives from AT&T, HTC, and Facebook have not responded to our questions at time of writing), AT&T will continue to sell the First until it fulfills its contractual obligations to display the thing in its myriad retail stores.

    And just how bad was the First doing? Epstein expounds a bit on Twitter, noting that the infinitely lamer HTC Status sold more during its first month on the market than the First did. That may not be the most fair comparison to make considering that the Status was HTC’s first foray into baking Facebook directly into an Android device (and in a time when the Facebook Android app was markedly worse than it is now), but there you have it. What’s also unclear is what such a move would mean for the First in other markets — HTC CEO Peter Chou noted at the Facebook Home launch event that the device would be carried by France’s Orange and the UK’s EE later this summer.

    To be quite honest, it’s not exactly a shock to hear that the First hasn’t managed to whip the smartphone-hungry masses into a frenzy. Less than a week ago, AT&T slashed the on-contract price of the First from $99 to a scant $0.99 — it seemed like a curious move at the time given just how new the First was, but many took it as a signal that the sales situation was dire. The real question here is what managed to turn off consumers more: the First’s relatively modest spec sheet, or its reliance on Facebook Home. If I were a betting man, my money would be on the latter considering the thorough drubbing that Facebook’s replacement launcher has received from reporters and users alike and the fact that interest in Home as a whole seems to be waning.

    We’re working to verify this rumor one way or the other, but for now it’s best to take this whole thing with a grain of salt. After all, it wouldn’t be the first time a Facebook phone was erroneously thought to be taking a dip in the deadpool.

  • So UK carriers are selling anonymized customer data? That may not be a bad thing.

    The news that British 4G carrier EE is trying to sell anonymized user data, in league with market research firm Ipsos Mori, has been greeted with wrinkle-nosed outrage — particularly the part about the Metropolitan Police being a potential customer. After all, the UK has just (mostly) dodged proposed legislation that would have led to monolithic registers of citizens’ online communications. This is just a privatized version of the same thing, right?

    The short answer is no. The Sunday Times (paywall alert) may have billed its story as being about the potential sale of 27 million people’s details to the cops, but the reality is somewhat less alarming. As Ipsos Mori has been forced to explain in response to the exposé:

    “In conducting this research we only receive anonymized data without any personally identifiable information… We do not have access to any names, personal address information, nor postcodes or phone numbers. We can see the volume of people who have visited a website domain, but we cannot see the detail of individual visits, nor what information is entered on that domain. We only ever report on aggregated groups of 50 or more customers. We will never release any data that in any way allows an individual to be identified.”

    So what does this data tell us? According to the original article, it provides insights based on “gender, age, postcode, websites visited, time of day text is sent [and] location of customer when call is made”.

    Reverse engineering

    Now, as we discussed recently, it is easier than you might think to de-anonymize data due to the uniqueness of our personal movement patterns — as long as you have the will, the datasets and the pieces of identifying information that can be correlated with the anonymized individuals effectively described in those datasets. So those horrified reactions to the weekend’s revelations are not entirely groundless. They are over-the-top, though.

    There is a significant difference between a register of communications (who contacted whom and when) and a pool of anonymized data where the most fine-grained nugget of information that might be reverse-engineered would tell you that Person X visited the Gmail domain while within a 100 meter radius of the corner of Oxford Street and Tottenham Court Road. To assume equivalence between the two ideas is to ignore the elements of intent, will, data-crunching capacity and, frankly, competence. In short, there are far easier ways for the police to track individuals through their handsets, such as just going to the carrier and demanding to do so.

    (The Sunday Times said sources claimed “officers had been enthusiastic about the potential for tracking users of pay-as-you-go phones,” but – quality of sources notwithstanding — I suspect those officers may have been slightly overestimating their own data-crunching powers. They may have also overlooked the fact that the operators would have no idea of their pay-as-you-go users’ age or gender, making it near-impossible to tease out an individual from the anonymized mass. Either way, they backed off once the story broke.)

    Not damning

    And then there’s the matter of this data’s innocent utility. Of all the sources of “big data” that is both largely untapped and genuinely useful, mobile operators must be among the most potentially fruitful. In societies where everyone is carrying a phone, there can be no better way to establish the density and fluidity of traffic flows and footfall. This data is gold dust, not just for retailers, but also for town planners and councils. It shows us how our cities and roads really work, and it can help us make them more efficient and pleasant to live in or use.

    I feel a bit sorry for EE in this particular case. After all, its rivals Telefonica (trading as O2) and Vodafone are also offering up their customer data for analytics purposes – Telefonica’s “Dynamic Insights” program is being carried out in partnership with market research firm GfK, while Voda launched its mobile analytics play just last Friday.

    “Everyone is doing it” would be a lousy apology in itself, but I don’t think any of these carriers or their partners are doing anything wrong, as long as their datasets are suitably anonymized. If people could feasibly be personally identified from this data, the carriers and their market research partners would instantly find themselves on the wrong side of existing data protection legislation — the fines in the UK for this stuff are pretty paltry, but they would also quickly lose the trust of their customers, so there’s little motivation for the telcos and their partners to cross the line.

    It’s great that people are concerned and watchful about their privacy, and long may they continue to be. However, this is a case where the potential benefits of the data are both great and realistically attainable, and where the downsides are so unfeasible as to be worth discounting, at least at this stage. It’s now up to the carriers to explain this to their customers in understandable and honest terms.

    There will be great battles worth fighting in the war over our personal data and its exploitation. This ain’t one of them.

    Related research and analysis from GigaOM Pro:
    Subscriber content. Sign up for a free trial.