





Les cuento que encontré estos renders pero no creo que sea un proyecto muy firme…por otra parte es en el puertito del buceo.






Les cuento que encontré estos renders pero no creo que sea un proyecto muy firme…por otra parte es en el puertito del buceo.
Filed under: Detroit Auto Show, Coupe, Performance, Cadillac, Design/Style
Yup, we just saw the 2010 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe in the flesh and… do want. Let’s make that double do want. Why? We think it’s glorious looking, and with the possible exception of the Pontiac Solstice, the CTS Coupe is among the best looking American cars in a very long time. That said, while the “base” coupe is a stunner, it’s the V-job that really gets our juices flowing.
If you don’t know, the V-Series gets the same 556-horsepower, 6.2-liter V8 as the sedan with sir’s choice of a quick-witted six-speed automatic or manual gearbox, magnetic ride control suspension and honkin’ Brembo brakes. General Motors has declined to get specific about how much lighter the CTS-V Coupe will be compared to its more family-minded stablemate, but officials have confirmed that it will be marginally lighter on the scales (we’re guessing less than 100 pounds).
Changes from the sedan? Well, aside the obvious lack of rear doors, a B-pillar-ectomy and much faster windshield and backlight angles, not too much. Okay, so there’s a slightly wider rear track and an available Saffron interior color (a coupe exclusive), but that’s about it. All that is fine by us, because the CTS-V Coupe is all kinds of muscular, angular gorgeousness. Besides, amidst the Detroit Auto Show and its burgeoning sea of feel-good treehugging solutions, the CTS-V stands alone as a beacon of tire-smokin’ glory.
Gallery: Detroit 2010: Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
Gallery: 2011 Cadillac CTS-V Coupe
Live photos by Drew Phillips / Copyright (C)2010 Weblogs, Inc.
[Source: Cadillac]
Continue reading Detroit 2010: Cadillac CTS-V Coupe might just be our best-of-show
Detroit 2010: Cadillac CTS-V Coupe might just be our best-of-show originally appeared on Autoblog on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:28:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]
Filed under: Concept Cars, Detroit Auto Show, Convertible, Europe, Mini, Off-Road
The roof, too. That’s right folks, Mini rolled out a concept of a concept. The Beachcomber (see above) is based on the Mini Crossover. However, the Crossover is no longer just a concept, as it will be making its way to production soon. And it’s not alone, as Mini has also green lit the Coupe and Roadster. All three will be produced at Mini’s Oxford, UK plant.
Speaking of Mini, their sales were down six percent last year. Or should we say only six percent, as 2009 basically sucked as far as car sales go. In the U.S., however, Mini sales were down 16 percent, but the segment (small premium cars) was off a disheartening 40 percent. Nevertheless, the U.S. remains Mini’s largest market with currently 90 dealers and the brand is looking to increase that number with an additional 17 dealers over the next 18 months.
As far as this here Beachcomber Concept goes, let’s just say there’s an emphasis on concept. While it does in some ways evoke the original Mini Moke – especially the slotted grille – the Beachcomber has as much a chance at seeing production as a Lamborghini subcompact. Maybe less. That said, the Beachcomber does feature all-wheel drive. And if there’s anything we like more than suicide doors, it’s no doors at all. No top either for that matter. What if you should get caught in a freak Malibu hailstorm? Mini says a soft roof and lightweight doors are included. So there you go.
Gallery: Mini Beachcomber concept
Live photos by Drew Phillips / Copyright (C)2010 Weblogs, Inc.
[Source: Mini]
Detroit 2010: Mini Beachcomber Concept leaves the doors behind originally appeared on Autoblog on Mon, 11 Jan 2010 19:01:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.
Permalink | Email this | Comments
Buy This Item: [Click here to buy this item]
Universal Studios Spiderman is getting a facelift — and that isn’t exactly a good thing.

After a rumored script dispute pushed the blockbuster off the May 2011 calender, the movie franchise’s long-awaited fourth installment has unraveled all together. Spiderman 4 was cut from Columbia’s production schedule on Monday, E! Online reports. While later Spidey installments are in the work, they won’t feature series stars Tobey Maguire and Kirsten Dunst, Columbia Pictures and Marvel Studios announced on Monday.
Franchise producers will re-make the series once the concept is re-worked, moving the Spiderman movie saga to a teenage Peter Parker’s high-school days. Spiderman 1-3 director Sam Raimi is also out of a job, execs announced. Raimi said working on the movies was the “experience of a lifetime” and that he thinks studios will do a “terrific job” on the new films.
Spiderman is set to re-launch in summer 2012.
Though Google’s social strategy has been catch-up at best to date, the company does have a master plan — at least according to engineering director David Glazer, whom I spoke with last week at Google HQ. He said across a variety of products, Google wants to make it valuable and easy to harness social information.
In 2010, Google plans to expose and elicit more of the social network built into the tools that many of us already use — Gmail, Google Talk, etc. If you use Google products, the company already knows who your most important contacts are, what your core interests are, and where your default locations are. Glazer said to expect many product and feature launches that start to connect that information in useful ways.
“Everything is better when it knows who I am,” said Glazer, who is responsible for working on developer platforms that include social aspects — a more distributed role than he had at Google in the past, Glazer said, when he was working on social exclusively. That’s an improvement, he said, since social products are no longer siloed within the company.
What does “social” mean to Google? “Who I am, who do I know, what do I do,” said Glazer.
One of the early examples of this approach is Google Social Search, launched as a labs product last October. When a user opts into the feature, you see on the search results page (way way down at the bottom) results from people in what Google considers your “social circle.” That’s people you’re connected to on services you’ve listed publicly, like Twitter and FriendFeed; people in your Gmail or Google Talk chat list; and people you’ve placed in contact groups on Gmail.
Another example of a social layer is Google Latitude, where you can see your participating friends’ location on a real-time map.
The other main pillar of Google’s social strategy is to support interoperable, open community-driven standards. So while OpenSocial and Friend Connect may not be beating out their rivals Facebook Platform and Facebook Connect, Glazer can say it’s all part of the master plan — to have a “distributed, open social ubiquitous web,” not to be the one company who owns people’s online identities. To that end, Google has this month brought on strategists Joseph Smarr and Chris Messina, both widely known for their advocacy of the open social web.
Glazer reeled off a family of Google-supported technical standards that “are just about done”: OpenID, OAuth, OAuth WRAP, PoCo (portable contacts), Activity Streams, OpenSocial for Gadgets, OpenSocial wire protocols, PubSubHubBub, Salmon (to “let comments swim upstream”), WebFinger (see a person’s public feed of information) and the Social Graph API.
That’s a pretty geeky and theoretical list, and one that will surely take more than a year to permeate the experiences of normal web users. It’ll be good to see when Google drops down into the present day to make the product launches Glazer is promising. It’s one thing to take the long view on social, but the present-day web is moving more quickly than that.
Related GigaOM Pro Research: Why Google Should Fear the Social Web

You
know you’re at an MMA fight when a woman in the crowd is catcalling a
fighter who is writhing in pain on the ground. Nik Lentz was on the
receiving end of two vicious boots to the groin but there wasn’t much
mercy from the angry woman or Thiago Tavares. The Brazilian was super
aggressive down the stretch blasting away at Lentz. It was all for
naught because he had a point taken away on the second low blow. It
costs him the fight, scored a majority draw, 28-28, 28-28 and 27-29.
Lentz
said in the cage he thought Tavares kicked him in the groin on purpose.
The second low blow left Lentz prone on the ground for three minutes at
the start of the third round. That’s when the lovely lady seated just
behind the media section began ripping Lentz.
"The second time it was a full blown thai kick right to the nuts. It wouldn’t have been that bad but if you can break a steel cup?" said
Lentz. "I have a crack down the middle of it. He did it on purpose. It was ridiculous. I would fight him
again but I know he wouldn’t do it."
Lentz also mentioned some first round numbness in his hand, saying he might have fractured the hand.
STORY DOWNS LENNOX IN FIGHT OF THE NIGHT CANDIDATE
Jesse Lennox is one tough dude. He took a beating at the hands Rick Story.
Story was the crisper striker throughout and worked effectively on the
ground in the second nearly locking on a kimura. Lennox was competitive
throughout but judge Eric Colon saw a different fight giving him "The Ox"
the nod 29-28. The other two judges had it 30-27, awarding Story a split
decision victory.
"I was surprised. I was expecting him to go for more takedowns. I was a little bit taller than him and I had a little bit more reach. It’s the way I wanted it to go."
Story (9-3, 2-1 UFC) was effective throughout with body kicks.
Electronic Arts has once again released another developer diary of Dante’s Inferno, the highly controversial videogame adaptation of the Divine Comedy. In the latest video installment, the developer’s opens up the eight circle of hell, “fraud”. Watch
Achates Power has raised $19.2 million in a second round of financing and brought in a new investor, Triangle Peak Partners, the company announced in recent days. The San Diego, Calif.-based startup, whose investors include Sequoia Capital, Rockport Capital Partners and other venture firms, is working on two-stroke diesel engine tech that it says will […]
Lady Gaga will be sharing the stage with a very special guest when she kicks off the U.K. leg of her Fame Monster Tour in London later this month — her childhood musical idol Boy George!
The “Poker Face” hitmaker has hired the ’80s pop icon to support her on tour in Britain next month. The former Culture Club singer will perform alongside the Gaga during her dates at the O2 Arena, the songstress said Monday.
“I didn’t fit in at high school, I wanted to be like Boy George and I felt like a freak. So now I like to create this atmosphere for my fans where they feel like they have a freak in me to hang out with, and they don’t feel alone.” Gaga explained of her admiration for the crooner last year.
The trouble-prone star is currently on probation after being imprisoned last year for holding a male escort hostage in his flat. He must seek permission from the court before accepting any job offers, and was recently banned from starring in the last season the UK reality show Celebrity Big Brother.
Children dying from diabetic ketoacidosis were kept in large wards, often with 50 or more patients in a ward, mostly comatose. Grieving family members were often in attendance, awaiting the (until then, inevitable) death.
In one of medicine’s more dramatic moments Banting, Best, and Collip went from bed to bed, injecting an entire ward with the new purified extract. Before they had reached the last dying child, the first few were awakening from their coma, to the joyous exclamations of their families.
Peter Friedman points us to the news that Google has apparently quietly stopped hosting AP content on its site. You may recall that a little over two years ago (after much back and forth), Google began hosting AP content. This was licensed content that Google had paid for — but that deal came about after the AP made some noise suggesting that Google’s linking to content (with headlines and snippets) could be infringing. Rather than stand up to that (surprisingly, since it had a strong case), Google just did a licensing deal. What amazed me, at the time (and since), is that this didn’t piss off AP members. Before this deal, Google would link directly to AP member websites who posted versions of AP stories, driving more traffic to those newspapers sites. After this deal, however, Google sent most of that traffic directly to its own site, and paid the AP directly for the license. The end result? The “members” of the AP got less traffic and fewer ad impressions. If I were an AP member I would be incredibly pissed off that the AP was directly competing with me and basically getting paid by Google to block traffic to my site.
So why has Google stopped posting new AP stories? Some think it may be Google calling the AP’s bluff. That’s because, despite having a deal that gives the AP lots of money for the right to post its content, the AP continues to make ridiculous claims that Google is somehow “stealing” its content. So, some suggest that Google pulled the content to show the AP what life is like without Google. There may be a more reasonable explanation, however. The original AP/Google deal expires towards the end of this month, and the original deal (stupidly, annoyingly, and against basic web accepted best practices) only allowed Google to host content for 30 days. After that, it disappears and people searching for that old content or following old links are simply told its gone (think of how much ad revenue the AP has lost because of that…). With the deal running out, Google knew it would then need to take down all AP content immediately, and it probably did not want to have content posted for less than 30 days — so when it hit the 30 day mark, it just stopped posting content to avoid having stories that would go up and be taken down too rapidly.
Still, it makes you wonder how AP member papers are faring — since they may now be getting more traffic from Google, because those AP stories showing up online from AP member papers will now get listed, once again, instead of just being hosted on Google itself.
Permalink | Comments | Email This Story
A few months ago we were laughing at/with Palm investor Roger McNamee after his All Things D interview with Kara Swisher and Walt Mossberg. And this year at CES, Palm saw fit to send just CEO Jon Rubinstein into the gauntlet, and even in the face of what some may call some rather nonsensical and unnecessarily combative and prying questioning from Swisher alone, he held up well. Sure, Swisher wanted to know what’s coming next, but Rubinstein would have nothing of it and refused to divulge any new details. That said, there were still some interesting things to take away from the interview, like Rubinstein’s admission of having never used an iPhone.
For the record, I have copied and pasted the professors’ letter and added some emphasis and comments not in the original letter.
[HT Maclean’s for linking to the original full letter]
More reports from Ottawa Citizen (with full letter), CBC (with video interview with Prof. Weinstock), Maclean’s, Canada.com (include phone interview with Weinstock).
***
Against the Prorogation of Parliament
As Canadian university professors dedicated to educating students about democratic institutions, we are deeply concerned by Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s decision to use his power to prorogue Parliament for a second year in a row in circumstances that allow him to evade democratic accountability. The Prime Minister is not only making cavalier use of the discretionary powers entrusted to him in our Parliamentary system, but in so doing he is undermining our system of democratic government. [k-note: “evade democratic accountability” and “undermining our system of democratic government”]
It has been noted by many observers that the Prime Minister did nothing technically wrong by requesting that Parliament be prorogued and in fixing the date for a Throne Speech after the Vancouver Olympics.
The Prime Minister does have the sole responsibility to request prorogation from the Governor-General (although the custom is to request it in person, out of respect for the office of the Queen’s representative, and that was not done in this case). But it is highly unusual – and improper – to request it in circumstances like these.
What, precisely, did the Prime Minister do wrong in proroguing Parliament?
Our parliamentary and constitutional institutions are grounded not just in explicit rules but also in the spirit of those rules.
Think of the idea of a “loyal opposition” so central to our practice of responsible government. The role of the opposition parties is to hold the government to a high standard of justification. The opposition parties can neglect their responsibilities by being servile and pliant. They can also misuse their powers for narrowly partisan purposes.
We expect them to avoid both these pitfalls. We expect them to be vigorous. And, while an element of partisanship is inevitable in democratic systems of government, we expect that it will be moderated by public-spiritedness and a shared concern for the country’s common good. If it isn’t, then the opposition has failed to do its job.
What is true of opposition parties is true in spades of the office of the Prime Minister, given the very great powers that are concentrated there in our system of responsible government. We expect that the Prime Minister will do his part to ensure that this system works, and that MPs can fulfill the role we elect them to do. Part of what that means is to exercise self-restraint, and not use the powers that he possesses to shut down the mechanisms of accountability to Parliament and the Canadian people.
The use of the ability to prorogue by the present Prime Minister clearly displays no such self-restraint. It was nakedly partisan when it was invoked to save his government from defeat in a confidence motion in December 2008, and it is nakedly partisan now, when it is being used to short-circuit the work of the Parliamentary Committee looking into the Afghan detainees question and evade Parliament’s request that the government turn over documents pertaining to that question.
The normal way in which a government secures a break in a parliamentary session is through adjournment. That permits the institutions of government to continue. Committees can do their work. Legislation that is in the system can be picked up and advanced once the adjournment is over. In prorogation, all the business of Parliament ceases. Any laws that are in process, with the exception of private members’ bills, have to be introduced again, at the very first step of the process.
The government’s post-election legislative agenda is nowhere near having been fulfilled. The Prime Minister cannot, therefore, credibly invoke the purpose that the power to prorogue properly serves, which is to provide the government with space outside the cut and thrust of Parliamentary sessions in which to submit a new legislative agenda to Parliament.
Given the short-term, tactical, and partisan purposes served by prorogation, and given the absence of any plausible public purpose served by it, we conclude that the Prime Minister has violated the trust of Parliament and of the Canadian people. We emphasize moreover that the violation of this trust strikes at the heart of our system of government, which relies upon the use of discretionary powers for the public good rather than merely for partisan purposes. How do we make sure it serves the public good? By requiring our governments to face Parliament and justify their actions, in the face of vigorous questioning.
[*****] The Prime Minister’s actions risk setting a precedent that weakens an important condition of democratic government – the ability of the people, acting through their elected representatives, to hold the government accountable for its actions. [*****]
*****
Postscript:
Quoting Canada.com,
“Weinstock, in a telephone interview Monday, said that he had intended to simply submit the letter under his own name. But before doing that, he asked two friends to review it and they asked if they could attach their names to it. Eventually it began to circulate among academics involved in politics, philosophy and the law and now has 175 signatories.“
I want to personally thank Prof. Weinstock taking time to write the letter and other cosigners for supporting it. When Canadian democracy is under attack, it is nice to see people willing to speak up for Canada and be counted.
Posted in Calgary, Canada, Democracy, Law, people, politics, World

This is a 5 star international branded hotel and beach resort development. In addition to the standard hotel amenities, the development will include: Yacht Club with slips for 20 vessels; the largest children entertainment center in Azerbaijan; SPA and wellness therapy center; indoor and outdoor sport facilities and bowling alleys.




Left: In the past, marketers have relied on tried and true demographics to understand customers. Now, as consumers adopt social technologies, marketers must measure socialgraphics, which indicates how they interact with each other.
Beware of plans or proposals that start with “Twitter Strategy” or “Facebook Strategy” Instead, they should have a “Customer Strategy” that focuses in on how customers behave –not on the ever-changing toolset. As a result, companies should first understand how their customers use social technologies before they choose the tools. Socialgraphics is how to measure how customers use social technologies, where they are online, and how it influence them in the context of the customer lifecylce.
This upcoming free webinar, suited for corporations who want to develop plans in social with confidence, will answer how to apply socialgraphics. Like demographics or psychographics, companies must now understand socialgraphics, which answers five key questions:
Socialgraphics answers five key questions:
When properly deployed, Socialgraphics, helps companies, their agency partners, and business units be more effective in their planning and deployment –reducing risk from deploying without having knowledge.
In the spirit of open research, we will make this webinar, the slides, and the overall methodology available for the public to use, under creative commons license. We hope you’ll join us. Stay tuned as we have other webinars coming soon.

A cuckoo on a wristwatch—this concept design pleases me. Although, without a working cuckoo bird, this watch would be nothing. NOTHING! [Designboom]
John Paulson’s hedge fund firm Paulson & Co has just filed a 13D with the SEC and has disclosed a 17.4% ownership stake in SuperMedia (SPMD). The filing was made due to activity on December 31st, 2009 and they now own 2,607,506 shares. This is a newly disclosed stake for them as they did not show share ownership of SPMD when we previously looked at Paulson’s portfolio. SuperMedia is the new name for Idearc, who recently emerged from bankruptcy.
Their position in SuperMedia does require some explanation as they didn’t just solely purchase shares. Taken direct from the SEC filing, we see that “A total of $12,117,456 was paid to acquire shares pursuant to the Standby Purchase Agreement.
Join the conversation about this story »
See Also:
News Author: Laurie Barclay, MD
CME Author: Charles P. Vega, MD
The American Diabetes Association (ADA) revised clinical practice recommendations for diabetes diagnosis promote hemoglobin A1c (A1c) as a faster, easier diagnostic test that could help reduce the number of undiagnosed patients and better identify patients with prediabetes. The new recommendations are published December 29 in the January supplement of Diabetes Care.
"We believe that use of the A1c, because it doesn’t require fasting, will encourage more people to get tested for type 2 diabetes and help further reduce the number of people who are undiagnosed but living with this chronic and potentially life-threatening disease," Richard M. Bergenstal, MD, ADA president-elect of medicine & science, said in a news release. "Additionally, early detection can make an enormous difference in a person’s quality of life. Unlike many chronic diseases, type 2 diabetes actually can be prevented, as long as lifestyle changes are made while blood glucose levels are still in the pre-diabetes range."
The A1c test, which measures average blood glucose levels for a period of up to 3 months, was previously used only to evaluate diabetic control with time. An A1c level of approximately 5% indicates the absence of diabetes, and according to the revised evidence-based guidelines, an A1c score of 5.7% to 6.4% indicates prediabetes, and an A1c level of 6.5% or higher indicates the presence of diabetes.
For optimal diabetic control, the recommended ADA target for most people with diabetes is an A1c level no greater than 7%. It is hoped that achieving this target would help prevent serious diabetes-related complications including nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy, and gum disease.
Unlike fasting plasma glucose testing and the oral glucose tolerance test, A1c testing does not require overnight fasting. Compliance with screening may therefore be improved through use of the A1c test, which can be determined from a single nonfasting blood sample.
Recommendation Changes for 2010
Specific changes in the 2010 Clinical Practice Recommendations are as follows:
* A section on diabetes related to cystic fibrosis has been added to "Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes." New evidence has shown that early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes and aggressive treatment with insulin have narrowed the gap in mortality between patients with cystic fibrosis with and without diabetes and have eliminated the sex difference in mortality rates. New recommendations for the clinical management of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes, based on a 2009 consensus conference, will be published in 2010 in a consensus report.
* Revision of the section "Diagnosis of Diabetes" now includes the use of the A1c level for diabetes diagnosis, with a cutoff point of 6.5%.
* The section formerly named "Diagnosis of Pre-diabetes" is now named "Categories of Increased Risk for Diabetes." Categories suggesting an increased risk for future diabetes now include an A1c range of 5.7% to 6.4%, as well as impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance levels.
* Revisions to the section "Detection and Diagnosis of GDM [Gestational Diabetes Mellitus]" now include a discussion of possible future changes in this diagnosis, according to international consensus. Screening recommendations for gestational diabetes are to use risk factor analysis and an oral glucose tolerance test, if appropriate. Women diagnosed with gestational diabetes should be screened for diabetes 6 to 12 weeks postpartum and should have subsequent screening for the development of diabetes or prediabetes.
* Extensive revisions to the section "Diabetes Self-Management Education" are based on new evidence. Goals of diabetes self-management education are to improve adherence to standard of care, to educate patients regarding appropriate glycemic targets, and to increase the percentage of patients achieving target A1c levels.
* Extensive revisions to the section "Antiplatelet Agents" now reflect evidence from recent trials suggesting that in moderate- or low-risk patients, aspirin is of questionable benefit for primary prevention of cardiovascular disease. The revised recommendation is to consider aspirin treatment as a primary prevention strategy in patients with diabetes who are at increased cardiovascular risk, defined as a 10-year risk greater than 10%. Patients at increased cardiovascular risk include men older than 50 years or women older than 60 years with at least 1 additional major risk factor.
* Fundus photography may be used as a screening strategy for retinopathy, as described in the section "Retinopathy Screening and Treatment." However, although high-quality fundus photographs detect most clinically significant diabetic retinopathy, they should not act as a substitute for an initial and dilated comprehensive eye examination. Retinal examinations should be carried out annually or at least every 2 to 3 years among low-risk patients with normal eye examination results in the past.
* Extensive revisions to the section "Diabetes Care in the Hospital" now question the benefit of very tight glycemic control goals in critically ill patients, based on new evidence.
* Extensive revisions to the section "Strategies for Improving Diabetes Care" are based on newer evidence. Successful strategies to improve diabetes care, which have resulted in improved process measures such as measurement of A1c levels, lipid levels, and blood pressure, include the following:
o Delivery of diabetes self-management education.
o Adoption of practice guidelines developed with participation of healthcare professionals and having them readily accessible at the point of service.
o Use of checklists mirroring guidelines, which help improve adherence to standards of care.
o Systems changes, including providing automated reminders to healthcare professionals and patients and audit and feedback of process and outcome data to providers.
o Quality improvement programs, in which continuous quality improvement or other cycles of analysis and intervention are combined with provider performance data.
o Practice changes, which may include access to point-of-care A1c testing, scheduling planned diabetes visits, and clustering dedicated diabetes visits into specific times.
o Tracking systems with either an electronic medical record or patient registry to improve adherence to standards of care.
o Availability of case or (preferably) care management services using nurses, pharmacists, and other nonphysician healthcare professionals following detailed algorithms under physician supervision.
"The most successful practices have an institutional priority for quality of care, involve all of the staff in their initiatives, redesign their delivery system, activate and educate their patients, and use electronic health record tools," the guidelines authors conclude. "It is clear that optimal diabetes management requires an organized, systematic approach and involvement of a coordinated team of dedicated health care professionals working in an environment where quality care is a priority."
Diabetes Care. December 29, 2009; January 2010 Supplement.