Dear Energy Professionals, Dear Colleagues,
In his December 2006 article on the Macroeconomics of Asset Shortages, Economist Ricardo J. Caballero says, “The world has a shortage of financial assets. Asset supply is having a hard time keeping up with the global demand for store of value and collateral by households, corporations, governments, insurance companies, and financial intermediaries more broadly. In equilibrium, the value of the (relatively) few existing assets must rise, which has important global macroeconomic implications. These shortages have been a perennial problem in emerging markets, where many of their economic perils and idiosyncrasies stem from this feature. But we are now seeing a shortage on a global scale. It probably began with the meltdown of a substantial share of Japanese assets in the early 1990s, it was exacerbated by European stagnation and the collective emerging market crises of the late 1990s, and it consolidated in the new millennium by the fast income growth of China and commodity countries, most of which have substantial asset demand needs but are not natural asset producers”.
It is so sad to visualize that on one hand world assets cannot find proper investments, while on the other hand our local power plant investments cannot find money to get started. There is a great investment credibility problem in our local energy markets. We need to have a clear inspection of this major problem starting from the annual investment requirements of our local market, clear figures of electricity supply demand in the local market, the capacity we will need in the future, and what we face if we do not initiate such investments.
In order to review the balance of electricity supply demand in Turkey, we look at the internet pages of a local Public Transmission company, and we come up with a Turkish Installed Capacity at 44,472.5 MWe as of November 2009.
We can also visualize that, on a month-by-month basis, installed capacity is lower in 2009 than in 2008. In 2008, installed capacity was 41817 MWe, and Peak load was 30842 MWe. We understand that we had no such a big shortage problem in year 2008.
In 2009, our Installed Capacity is 2600 MW higher, but our demand peak is 4% lower than it was in 2008. The hardest years for the Turkish system are the drought years since we have a high sensitivity due to the relatively high hydrocapacity.
So we multiply the installed capacity by 4650 hours for higher scenarios and by 4500 for lower scenario; this is a rough approximation for capacity utilization. Do note that the system has the ability to achieve more than 5000 hours on average annually. If the resulting number is less than the expected demand, then it means the electricity generation system is under stress.
44472.5 MW x 4500 hours (average per year overall availability) = 200 TW-hours
44472.5 MW x 4650 hours = 206.8 TW-hours
Expected demand for 2009 is 194 TW-hours.
Expected demand for 2010 is 206.6 TW-hours.
So without any adding any additional capacity, the existing installed capacity should be enough until the end of 2010.
In summary, Turkey has almost 45,000 MWe installed capacity, though we did not exceed 36,000 MWe at peak hours in 2009.
The remaining portion is NOT available since they are not reliable – sources such as wind, solar, hydro, all renewable – or they are out of service, as in case of many old thermal power plants.
Apart from periods of economic crisis, Turkey needs approximately a 6-8 percent increase per year in electricity output in order to keep the desired growth rate.
New investments require a project execution period of 2-4 years for natural gas-fired combined-cycle power plants, 1-2 years for wind, 5-7 years for hydro (ILISU?), and 7-20 years for nuclear. In this period, money is allocated, but revenues are not generated before completion.
Every kw of power created costs approximately $1000 US Dollars on average. Combined-cycle plants cost a bit less, $500-$600 USD per kw, while thermal power plants cost around $2000 USD per kw. There is no average price per kw available for nuclear power plants.
Now let us do some simple arithmetic with a low end of 6% annual electricity generation increase for an available power capacity of 36K MWe:
36,000 Mw = 36,000,000 Kw
Minimum 6 percent increase for each year x 1000 US Dollar investment per Kwe
0.06 x 36mx 1000 = 2.16 billion US Dollars per year investment needed minimum
So we feel that the figure of $1 billion USD per year upfront becomes too prudent for a higher expectation of the growth rate. So who will finance such a big investment package??
Leading local financiers may say that it is easy for Turkish financial capability, but one should not be so sure about that.
Furthermore, nuclear power plants are NOT a solution to power shortages, since we do not know the project execution period. It could take approximately 7 to 20 years to complete a nuclear power plant at this time for many reasons, including legal battles, technology restraints, fabrication difficulties, financing limitations, and regional and international politics.
Blackouts in small regions are currently happening already in Turkey. Although people living in big cities like Istanbul, Ankara, etc. do not face these shortages, it is a reality of life in many towns.
Many of them are classified as power disorders, but those power disorders wander from one area to another in Anatolia. A power failure in one area is repaired (!) and soon after that repair another new power interruption occurs in a neighboring region.
There may be unexpected blackouts (like the one in Paris or New York, sometime in 2005) due to unforeseen technical problems. But according to optimistic public employees of our local Public Transmission Company, the local system has enough reserve capacity till the end of 2012 in their worst-case scenario.
The best-case scenario is that we end the prevailing electricity comfort in 2014 or 2015. But capacity projections always have worst-case flexibility to predict a serious problem in 3-5 years in time. Hence, this projection likely reflects the delay between EMRA licensing and full electricity-producing operation. EMRA licenses, which are issued after March 2009 and are not included in the worst-case scenario, could be generating electricity in 5 years time and could delay the situation to 2015-2016.
In our humble opinion, the ground for an electricity supply crisis has been forming gradually since the beginning of 2006. We may unexpectedly encounter a power shortage crisis, and we turn a blind eye to the facts, in fact the culprits, while searching for other reasons as the cause.
Project financing is too difficult in Turkey, especially at this time of global financial turmoil. Public institutions have limited or almost no capability. Local investments are generally realized by “corporate finance” methods. Local investors risk their own property in order to get proper “corporate financing” at reasonable interest rates, and payment terms.
In the past, we have realized energy power plant investments exceeding 4000 MW installed capacity. Those natural gas-firing cogeneration plants quickly pay for themselves and create more money for further investments in new plants.
However, we do not have the investment environment for “non-recourse” project finance to secure “off taker” contracts. Therefore, it is too difficult to find the necessary project financing for mega projects such as nuclear plants and the plants in Afsin Elbistan. We have lost time in the past and continue to lose more and unable to recover fast in due time.
Turkey will need more local private financing and local contracting, local engineering, if applied. Your writer sincerely feels that our local private investors deserve all our support to complete new power plant investments, provided that they create jobs for the local engineers and for the local qualified manpower.
Please do note that above forecast is your writer’s humble calculation and does reflect the opinions of any public or private institution. Your comments are always welcome.
—
Haluk Direskeneli, Ankara-based Energy Analyst
Social media has grown tremendously this year pushed forward by the likes of Facebook and, to a lesser degree, Twitter. But despite having been around for years, businesses are still trying to get the hang of this new opportunity to bring in customers and, at the end of the day, make more money. One company which seems to get it, at least in this case, is Ikea which has put together a hugely successful campaign to promote a new store and did so at a significantly lower cost than if it had used traditional marketing methods. 
There are a lot of metrics for website traffic, unique visitors, user numbers, and the likes. Measuring a website’s “influence” is a harder proposition though, it’s not exactly something you can count. Some people beg to differ though and ://URLFAN aims to do just this, measure a website’s influence by counting the number of mentions it gets on blogs. It’s not the most objective metric out there, but it’s probably as good as it gets and it’s an interesting perspective. 
Perhaps a little reluctantly, Google has been slowly adding more rich content to its search engine. It’s still as spartan as it gets, but there’s certainly an evolution and now it’s making the same changes to the ads it serves on the search results page which now feature videos, images, and even maps. 
Watching online video may seem a very different experience to watching TV but, at least with some content, the trends are very similar. Hulu, the US online video outfit centered on TV content, saw a massive jump in viewership and audience in October in tune with the new TV season and the addition of ABC shows. AdAge, citing comScore numbers, reports that Hulu traffic jumped 47 percent from the previous month, the biggest rise this year.