Blog

  • Menachem Rosensaft: Patrick Buchanan: Poster Boy for Anti-Semitism (or What Else Is New?)

    Menachem Rosensaft: Patrick Buchanan: Poster Boy for Anti-Semitism (or What Else Is New?)
    Patrick Buchanan: Poster Boy for Anti-Semitism (or What Else Is New?) by Menachem Z. Rosensaft Like rancid salami, Patrick Buchanan is a gift that keeps…

    How They Passed Health Care: The Power Of Obama And What Olympia Snowe Really Wanted
    Barack Obama, the law professor, was acting like a prosecutor. He’d invited Grassley to the Oval Office, to talk about the senator’s concerns. But he…

    Gulf Drilling Regulators Let Oil Companies Fill Out Their Own Inspection Reports
    WASHINGTON — Federal regulators responsible for oversight of drilling in the Gulf of Mexico allowed industry officials several years ago to fill in their own…

    Offshore Drilling Insurance Premiums Soar 15 To 50 Percent
    The price to insure offshore drilling in the Gulf of Mexico has risen at least 15% since last month’s Deepwater Horizon disaster and may stay…

    Linda R. Monk, J.D.: Stop Calling It a Spill!
    A spill is an accident. This is a not an accident. It’s not a spill, it’s a crime scene.

  • Google Needs to Tread Softly With Android

    It seems that Android is on everyone’s mind, with an endless stream of information appearing daily about the platform and Google’s plans for it. Gizmodo interviewed Andy Rubin, lead engineer in charge of Android, and it is worth a read for the platform’s enthusiasts. Rubin answered some questions about patents, fragmentation and other hot topics in the Android world. His answers make sense but make it clear that Google may be playing with fire given the fast development rate with Android.

    Rubin has an almost cavalier attitude about the HTC patent situation that has gotten a lot of attention recently. He views the licensing of Microsoft IP by HTC no different than a company licensing MP3 technology to produce an audio app using the technology. He’s right this is similar, but Microsoft has indicated it is concerned about Android, not just HTC’s implementation of it, as infringing on its IP. That implies that the platform itself is viewed by both HTC and Microsoft as needing this IP protection, and that means every company producing Android handsets may need to license the technology from Redmond. This has the potential to have a financial burden to companies producing Android handsets. Rubin’s response in the Gizmodo interview ignores HTC’s suits with Apple, and makes one wonder if HTC is on its own as far as Google is concerned.

    When asked about fragmentation of the Android platform, admittedly due to the fast release rate of new versions of the OS, Ruben compared it to Windows of all things. He was asked specifially about the new Twitter app that requires Android 2.1 to run, and how that means that many existing handsets cannot run it.

    I mean there are apps written for Vista, just like Photoshop CS5 does not run on Windows 3.1. I mean it’s just a fact, there’s nothing new here.

    The problem is that Android is not Windows, and I am not sure that Google should want to emulate the Windows ecosystem. The timeframe between version updates of Windows is measured in years, and with Android so far this has been measured in weeks. Rubin does claim that this problem will not be as noticeable in the future, as releases for Android are going to slow down. One has to wonder how that will affect the rapid growth of the platform. Google is doing a great job with Android but had better tread softly to not rock the boat.

    Related content from GigaOM Pro (sub req’d): Google’s Mobile Strategy: Understanding the Nexus One



    Atimi: Software Development, On Time. Learn more about Atimi »

  • Fox’s “$165 billion” “union bailout” is neither

    Fox’s “$165 billion” “union bailout” is neither

    Fox News and Fox Business personalities have claimed that a bill dealing with union-administered pension funds is a “$165 billion bailout for unions.” In fact, the bill is not a “bailout for unions,” and its sponsor reportedly said it would cost the federal government $8 billion to $10 billion.

    Cavuto, Willis falsely claim bill is a “union bailout” that rewards unions’ “bad behavior”

    Cavuto: Bill is a “big union bailout.” On the May 24 edition of Fox News’ Your World, host Neil Cavuto called the federal corporation that insures private pension plans and takes over insured plans that go into default, such as when a company goes bankrupt. PBGC is not funded by general tax revenues; instead, it collects insurance premiums from employers that sponsor insured pension plans, earns money from investments and receives funds from pension plans it takes over. For instance, when appliance maker Whirlpool Corp. closed a plant, PBGC took over the pension plan for workers at the plant and negotiated an $11.7 million payment from Whirlpool to help fund the plan.

    Multi-employer funds — and the companies that pay into them — are weighed down by companies that went bankrupt. A March 24 Journal of Commerce article on Casey’s unveiling of his bill at a facility of trucking firm YRC Worldwide reported that multi-employer pension funds “have been weakened” by “the failure of many unionized companies that once supported them,” which forces the remaining companies whose workers are part of the fund to pay “the benefits of pensioners who never worked for them”:

    In addition to YRC officials, representatives from ABF Freight System, Kroger and the Teamsters union attended the event. The companies belong to dozens of regional Teamster multiemployer pension funds, including the Central States Pension Fund.

    Those plans have been weakened not only by the economic downturn, but the failure of many unionized companies that once supported them — including major companies such as Consolidated Freightways. UPS paid $6.1 billion to withdraw from the plans in 2008.

    That’s left YRC and ABF paying for the benefits of pensioners who never worked for them, but for businesses that may have closed years ago, making them “orphans.”

    YRC suspended contributions to its pension plans last year under an agreement with the Teamsters, but will have to resume payments in January, and the company supports reform that would lower pension costs before those payments kick in next year.

    Casey’s bill would tackle the orphan problem by allowing multiemployer plans to partition off those benefits in separate accounts, overseen by the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp., an independent agency of the federal government. Within five years, the PBGC would take over those accounts.

    Bill does not “bail out” unions — it separates out employees of defunct firms and guarantees part of their benefits. Casey’s bill would allow pension funds to “partition” former employees of defunct firms from those of active employers within the fund, helping to preserve solvency for the fund and preventing employers paying into the fund from having to pay for the benefits of workers they never employed. PGBC would then separately guarantee benefits for those former employees of bankrupt companies. From a March 22 Casey press release announcing the unveiling of the bill:

    “Pension plans across the country have taken major losses because of the near economic collapse and the decline in the stock market,” said Senator Casey. “Multi-employer plans face unique challenges that are overburdening pension plans and the bottom lines of companies. My legislation would help correct these problems to protect the pensions of workers and unburden companies stuck paying a crippling expense that threatens its existence and the jobs of its employees.”

    Multi-employer plans face additional challenges as many firms in these plans have shut down during the recession without funding their pension obligations. Many multi-employer pension plans now run the risk of insolvency.

    As more companies leave the pension plan, the costs left to the remaining companies increase to cover the pension benefits of all employees covered by the plan. Companies still contributing to the plans also run the risk of bankruptcy because of the additional burden of being forced to pay for the pensions of the employees of other companies.

    Senator Casey’s legislation would make a number of changes to help ensure solvency of multi-employer pension plans and protect current and future retirees.

    Specifically, Senator Casey’s Create Jobs and Save Benefits Act would strengthen the funding status of multi-employer plans by making the following changes:

    • Mergers and Alliances — The language in the bill would enable multi-employer funds to combine resources for purposes of reducing administrative costs.
    • Partition (ERISA Section 4233) — If a plan satisfies certain requirements, the plan will transfer to a separate account all benefit liabilities attributed to orphans (participants of employers who withdrew from the plan without paying withdrawal liability) and assets equal to a maximum of 5-years of projected benefit payments. The PBGC will handle the initial application, drafting of partition agreement and monitor financial assistance to the plans. PBGC does not provide notices, calculate benefits or in any other form administer the plan. The orphans benefit will be fully guaranteed as if the orphan was still receiving benefits from the multi-employer plan.
    • Order the Department of Labor and Department of Treasury to prepare a report on whether the qualified partition program has strengthened the financial condition of the original plans and improved the ability of the contributing employers to these plans to remain in business.

    Fox repeatedly pushes false claim that bill will cost $165 billion

    Willis: “[W]e’re talking possibly $165 billion.” On Your World, Cavuto asserted that the bill “could leave taxpayers for upwards of north of $160 billion, and that could be just the start of it.” Cavuto was joined by Willis, who said that “it could be as much as $165 billion.” On Fox Business’ Cavuto, Willis said that “we’re talking possibly $165 billion. That’s the pension obligations of these multi-employer pension funds for unions.” Cavuto later added that “this would amount to a $165 billion bailout for unions.”

    On-screen text: “Approx Price Tag: $165 Billion Dollars.” From the May 24 Your World:

    pension

    FoxBusiness.com: “[T]he bill could put another $165 billion in liabilities on the shoulders of American taxpayers.” From a May 24 FoxBusiness.com article:

    A Democratic senator is introducing legislation for a bailout of troubled union pension funds. If passed, the bill could put another $165 billion in liabilities on the shoulders of American taxpayers.

    […]

    Although right now taxpayers could possibly be on the hook for $165 billion, the liability could essentially be unlimited because these pensions have to be paid out until the workers die.

    Laffer: $165 billion figure “a huge amount of money just gone.” On Your World, following Cavuto’s interview with Willis, he hosted economist Art Laffer who said, “What you just looked at in the last five minutes was a huge amount of money just gone in five, seven minutes.” Cavuto replied: “That’s right. I think it’s about $20 billion a minute here.”

    Hoenig: Bill “a $165 billion minimum — could be potentially even unlimited bailout.” On Cavuto, Jonathan Hoenig of CapitalistPig Asset Management said, “The Create Jobs and Save Benefits Act is a $165 billion minimum — could be potentially even unlimited bailout by taxpayers.”

    Bill does not cost $165 billion

    Casey: Bill would cost federal government $8 billion to $10 billion. A March 24 Journal of Commerce article reported that “Casey said the bill could cost the federal government between $8 billion and $10 billion.”

    Willis, FoxBusiness.com ignored Casey’s estimate. While Willis noted on Your World that Casey “disagreed with our analysis” and said, “Some have outrageously said that this is a ‘bailout that would cost $165 billion. That is totally false” — a quotation also repeated on Cavuto — Willis did not note Casey’s cost estimate on either Your World or Cavuto. The FoxBusiness.com article also failed to report Casey’s cost estimate.

    $165 billion figure represents total underfunding of all multi-employer pension funds. The $165 billion figure cited by Cavuto, Willis, and others is an estimate made in a September 2009 report by Moody’s Investor Service of the total underfunding of multi-employer pension funds, not the underfunding of such funds related to former employees of defunct companies. As the Capital Research Center summarized:

    Last September Moody’s Investor Services seconded [the Hudson Institute’s Diana] Furchtgott-Roth in warning about the perilous funding condition of multiemployer defined benefit plans. Its report, Growing Multiemployer Pension Funding Shortfall is an Increasing Credit Concern looked at the Labor Department’s Form 5500 for 126 multiemployer plans in 2007. With 2008 information yet unavailable, the data represented the best look at the majority of assets and obligations for all multiemployer plan. Moody’s remarked, “despite the limitations in the data a very stark picture emerges.” The 2007 data showed the plans overall were only 77 percent funded and had a total underfunding of $87 billion. By contrast, comparable single employer defined benefit plans were funded at 101 percent.

    But what about the condition of defined benefit pension plans after the financial meltdown at the end of 2008? Moody’s estimated that funding levels for the single employer plans it examined had fallen and now were only at 75 percent. As for multiemployer plans, Moody’s warned that “when data for year end 2008 is finally released, it will probably show substantial deterioration in asset values during 2008.” It estimated that the multiemployer plans surveyed from 2007 would be only 56 percent funded. In other words, they would be underfunded by about $165 billion dollars.

  • Megan Fox Too Thin For “Transformers 3?”

    Is Megan Fox is too thin to reprise her role Mikaela Banes in the next Transformers film? Although Megan insists it was her choice to walk away from the blockbuster Paramount franchise, we hear Michael Bay fired the outspoken actress after her waify appearance began to take away from her sex appeal.

    “He thinks she has lost too much weight and looks too frail. He wanted her to put on some weight,” says a source close to Bay, who has opted not to recast the screen siren for the third installment of the science-fiction series. “The crew doesn’t think she looks well, let alone the wholesome, curvy star they cast in the first film.”

    Supermodel Miranda Kerr is reportedly being courted to replace Fox in the franchise.


  • House bill would eliminate federal income tax on first $35K of all Americans’ earnings

    House bill would eliminate federal income tax on first $35K of all Americans’ earnings
    Excerpt: A bill was introduced in the House last week that would eliminate the federal income tax on the first $35,000 of all Americans’ earnings. The bill proposes to compensate for the loss in revenue by cutting $159 billion in supplemental war funding. H.R. 5353, known as the War is Making You Poor Act, is sponsored by […]

  • Simmons Will Step Aside for McMahon

    Simmons Will Step Aside for McMahon
    Rob Simmons (R) will hold a press conference this morning to announce he’s leaving the U.S. Senate race in Connecticut, the Hartford Courant reports.

    He lost the Republican convention’s endorsement last weekend to former World Wrestling CEO Linda McMahon (R).

    “Throughout the increasingly bitter campaign between Simmons and McMahon, Simmons had said he would abide by the convention’s choice and not force a primary. However on Friday he announced a change of heart and said he would primary McMahon for the party’s nomination after all.”

    Murray Holds Small Lead over Rossi
    A new University of Washington poll shows Sen. Patty Murray (D-WA) holding a slight edge over challenger Dino Rossi (R) in the U.S. Senate race, 44% to 40%.

    Rossi is expected to officially jump into the race tomorrow.

  • Is the Mean-Spirited, Ignorant, Tearful Glenn Beck Going to Have an Impact on America?

    Is the Mean-Spirited, Ignorant, Tearful Glenn Beck Going to Have an Impact on America?
    In his new book, journalist Alexander Zaitchik examines the character and career of the shock jock at the center of the far-right’s always-churning cultural storm.

    In his new book, journalist Alexander Zaitchik examines the character and career of the shock jock at the center of the far-right's always-churning cultural storm.

    Elected Officials Arrested Protesting DC’s Inaction on Immigration Reform
    The civil disobedience in New York was one of several nationwide.

    The civil disobedience in New York was one of several nationwide.

  • Obama’s West Point Speech Shows Signs of Smart “National Security Strategy”

    Obama’s West Point Speech Shows Signs of Smart “National Security Strategy”
    President Barack Obama’s speech at West Point on Saturday may be among the most important he has yet made during his sixteen month old presidency. The speech intimates a number of the key themes likely to appear in the National…


    United StatesNational securityAfghanistanBarack ObamaWarfare and Conflict

    The Challenge of Closing Tax Loopholes For Billionaires
    Who could be opposed to closing a tax loophole that allows hedge-fund and private equity managers to treat their earnings as capital gains – and pay a rate of only 15 percent rather than the 35 percent applied to ordinary…


    What’s the Deal With Brazil, Turkey, and Iran?
    If it seems like there are a lot of issues embedded in the dueling diplomacy over Iran’s nuclear program, it’s because there are a lot of issues embedded in… Rising powers asserting their influence, the efficacy of sanctions, American fetishes…


  • Steele Sides With Israeli Settlers At Central Park Rally: Obama Has ?Left Israel To Fend For Herself?

    Steele Sides With Israeli Settlers At Central Park Rally: Obama Has ?Left Israel To Fend For Herself?
    On Saturday, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele appeared at a right-wing pro-Israeli settler rally in New York’s Central Park, trashing the Obama administration’s policy toward Israel, and rejecting further Israeli “concessions” to the peace process. “It grieves me to the core,” said Steele, “to have to admit that today the American government has abdicated her […]

    On Saturday, Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele appeared at a right-wing pro-Israeli settler rally in New York’s Central Park, trashing the Obama administration’s policy toward Israel, and rejecting further Israeli “concessions” to the peace process.

    “It grieves me to the core,” said Steele, “to have to admit that today the American government has abdicated her traditional solidarity with Israel”:

    Today, Israel truly stands alone among governments. Facing existential threats more dangerous and more imminent than ever before. That’s not to say that Israel has been abandoned, however, by the American people. But there is no denying that the current administration and its Congressional collaborators have left Israel to fend for herself.

    Watch it:

    It would be interesting to hear Steele explain how the Obama administration’s request for — and its Congressional “collaborators’” approval of — an additional $205 million in assistance for Israel for the “Iron Dome” short-range missile defense system squares with his assertion that the U.S. is “leaving Israel to fend for herself.”

    Furthermore, as the Wall Street Journal reported earlier this month, despite tensions over Israeli settlements, under the Obama administration the U.S. and Israel “actually have undertaken a broad effort at military and strategic cooperation — including supplying Israel with sophisticated American military equipment — to counter threats from Iran and Hezbollah fighters armed by Syria.”

    Accusing the Obama administration of having an “appeasement-first mentality,” Steele went on to insist that “For the sake of Jerusalem, we must not be silent”:

    For the sake of Jerusalem, we must no longer allow this or any administration to second-guess the relationship between Israel and America. For the sake of Jerusalem, the world can longer demand that Israel sell out the security of her people, and make every concession in the book just on the off-chance that a Palestinian leadership might show up at the bargaining table willing to recognize Israel’s right to exist.

    Steele shouldn’t have to be reminded of this, but pressuring Israel to honor its own past commitments to cease settlement construction does not in any sense qualify as a “concession.” These commitments were made as part of agreements brokered by the United States and its partners, whose credibility is negatively impacted by the refusal of the parties to meet their obligations. This doesn’t seem to bother Steele.

    And, just in point of fact, the Palestinians already showed up at the bargaining table willing to recognize Israel’s right to exist, and did so — back in 1993.

    As was noted in a previous post, this rally was sponsored by some of the most hardcore pro-settler organizations in the country, groups that actively support the takeover of Palestinian land by violent Jewish religious extremists. It’s disgraceful that Steele would even appear at such an event in the first place, let alone go and tell transparent, pandering lies about the Obama administration’s policies and encourage the most rejectionist elements in Israeli politics in the interest of getting a few more votes for Republicans.

  • Obama backs ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ compromise that could pave way for repeal

    Obama backs ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ compromise that could pave way for repeal
    President Obama has endorsed a “don’t ask, don’t tell” compromise between lawmakers and the Defense Department, the White House announced Monday, an agreement that may sidestep a key obstacle to repealing the military’s policy banning gay men and lesbians from serving openly in the armed forces.



    Barack ObamaPresidentUnited Statesdon’t ask don’t tellHistory

    Obama administration conflicted about relying on BP to stop gulf oil spill
    The tenuous alliance among the Obama administration, the oil firm BP and Gulf Coast officials was visibly fraying on Monday, with exasperation on all sides mounting as oil from a deep-water gusher began lapping at the region’s environmentally fragile shoreline.


    Oil spillEnvironmentEnergyPetroleum in the EnvironmentUnited States

    Federal Eye: ‘Don’t ask, don’t tell’ compromise in the works
    White House officials, Democratic congressional leaders and gay rights groups met on Monday to discuss a possible repeal of the military’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy.


    don’t ask don’t tellUnited StatesHealthBarack ObamaJoint Chiefs of Staff

    President Obama seeks new version of line-item veto
    As part of what the White House called a campaign to crack down on wasteful government spending, President Obama on Monday asked Congress to grant him new powers to slice lawmakers’ pet projects from congressionally approved spending bills.



    Barack ObamaPresidentLine-item vetoUnited StatesHistory

    Senate bill brings new powers, new pressures for Fed
    The Federal Reserve, a target of bipartisan bashing during the past two years, has emerged a big winner in the financial overhaul passed by the Senate, but the broader powers granted by the legislation expose the central bank to new risks.


    United StatesGovernmentSenateLegislative BranchUnited States Senate

  • Dacia’s car models on German Autobahn

    Dear car drivers, I’m posting for Speed Market from Romania. I have received a link regarding “Reverse innovation in action: Romanian cars from a french company on the german autobahn” and i’m able to give more details regarding.

    First, please take on the post described by “Hardvard Business Review” on the blogs section:

    Imagine you’re German, you need a new family car, and you have a limited budget — say, US$9,400. What can you do? Continue using public transportation? Buy a used car? Or maybe buy a brand-new Dacia Logan!

    Dacia is a Romanian car manufacturer acquired in 1999 by French automaker Renault with the aim of designing low-cost passenger vehicles for emerging Eastern European markets. The Logan, a five-seater with a spacious trunk, was introduced in Romania in 2004 and subsequently to neighboring countries. The Logan’s basic version, costing US$6,500, was revolutionary in the automotive industry well before the Tata Nano appeared on the scene. Dacia now offers pickups, vans, station wagons, and mini SUVs (Duster) in emerging as well as developed markets. In Germany alone, where the car is offered starting at US$9,400, Dacia’s sales jumped from about 6,000 units in 2006 to about 85,000 units in 2009 — this in a land studded with its own car brands.

    To offer the car at such low prices, Renault followed a stringent design-to-cost approach. The Logan consists of fewer parts than the average Western car and is made of traditional steel in a labor-intensive assembly process in a low-cost country. To meet the needs of emerging market customers, the car has a fuel filter, increased ground clearance, and a battery that can survive extreme weather conditions. Maintenance is simple; a basic technician can do the work. Interestingly, the Logan originally was conceived at Renault‘s French R&D headquarters. Product development responsibility gradually shifted to the company’s new R&D center in Romania.

    When Dacia launched the Logan in Germany, they followed five principles that may be useful to other companies planning to bring emerging market products into developed markets.

    Focus on building platforms, not products. Platforms can be scaled up or down for global markets. For the German market, Dacia scaled up the product platform with more safety features and more appealing exterior characteristics, such as metallic paint. This allowed the automaker to charge higher prices and, in turn, reap higher profit margins.

    Select target customers. The company carefully chose its target customers. Typically, these customers are people who buy a Logan instead of a used car, a cheap, Asian import, or a very small European car. These customers value price, space, and reliability. Renault highlights Logan’s best space-price ratio in its respective car segment. The car’s exceptional reliability is highlighted via guarantees, regular checks, and customer satisfaction surveys.

    Please continue on the source this article.

    Did you know that about Dacia ?
    Dacia is a Romanian car manufacturer, named for the historic region that constitutes much of present-day Romania. It is now a subsidiary of the French carmaker Renault. The company is the main exporter from Romania with a market share of 10% of total exports.

    Automobile Dacia company was founded in 1966 with assistance from Renault and the main Dacia factory was built in 1968, in Colibaşi (now called Mioveni), near Piteşti. Dacia acquired the tooling and basic designs of the Renault 12. However, until the tooling was ready it was decided to produce the Renault 8 under licence; it was known as the Dacia 1100.

    From 1968 to 1972, some 44,000 were produced, with a very minor cosmetic change to the front in early 1970. Also produced in very limited numbers was the 1100S, with twin headlamps and a more powerful engine, used by the police and in motor racing.

    And now …

    Dacia Logan

    Dacia Logan MCV

    Dacia Sandero | Dacia Sandero Stepway

    Dacia Duster, first concept car

    Dacia Duster

    Romanians car, Dacia are very good cars, for the prices and quality and the road’s infrastructure. The low cost models are Dacia Logan, Dacia Logan MCV, Dacia Sandero, Dacia Sandero Stepway, Dacia Duster.

    Check here more information regarding Dacia and it’s car models.

  • Spy Shots: Is this the new 2011 Volkswagen Jetta?

    Spy Shots: 2011 Volkswagen Jetta

    A forum member over at GM Inside News snapped these photos of two Volkswagen prototype sedans driving around the Metro Detroit area. The two are believed to be the next-generation Volkswagen Jetta sedans, which are scheduled to debut later this fall.

    It may also be a possibility that the two sedans pictured are the upcoming New Midsize Sedan, which will be built at Volkswagen’s new Chattanooga, Tennessee, plant. However, the proportions of the two prototypes don’t seem to have anything “midsize” about them.

    We’re putting our money on the 2011 Volkswagen Jetta.

    Spy Shots: 2011 Volkswagen Jetta:

    – By: Omar Rana

    Source: GMI


  • HP Uses Bio Fuels for Rural Data Center Power

    CowData Centers are moving to rural areas where land and labor are less expensive.  There are often farms and lots of cows … and therefore lots of cow manure.

    A significant cost of operating data centers is the electric bill.

    " … Hewlett-Packard …simultaneously help dairy farmers get rid of cow manure and help data center operators procure relatively cheap fuel: Use the manure to power servers."

    " … data centers … building them in rural areas, which happen to have an excess of animal waste. The heat from a data center could be used to improve the process by which the waste turns it into methane, which can be used in place of natural gas or diesel, HP’s researchers maintain. "

    "… average dairy cow, … produces approximately 120 pounds of waste a day. It would take 10,000 cows to produce enough energy for a data center big enough to support a bank.  "

     

    Via:  Fierce CIO LINK

  • Jeb Bush on the Republican Future

    Jeb Bush on the Republican Future
    Fred Barnes, Weekly Standard
    “It is all about a four-letter word: jobs, jobs, jobs, jobs. We are all about jobs.”�”"Nancy Pelosi, May 4, 2010It would have taken a heart of stone not to laugh. Wheeled out earlier this month for celebrations to mark his 80th birthday, a rickety Helmut Kohl announced that the fate of the EU's floundering single currency was a matter of life and death: “European unification is a question of war and peace .”�”�.”�”�. and the euro is part of our guarantee of peace.”� West PointCoral Gables, FloridaJeb Bush is not running…

    Obama Should Have Stood Up to Calderon

    Russia is Getting Its ‘Sphere’ Back

    Alexander Emerges as Trusted Adviser to McConnell

  • 10 Things You Need To Know Before The Opening Bell (AIG, BP, SPY)

    north korea

    Good morning. Here’s what you need to know:

    • Asian markets fell significantly overnight due to increasing geopolitical fears associated with the Korean Peninsula. European markets are also down hard in early trading on similar news, as well as concerns over the Spanish banking system. U.S. futures are down ahead of today’s trading day.
    • Credit is not just becoming tighter in Europe, but worldwide, as investors are now beginning to fear the threat of European debt contagion and a potential double-dip recession. U.S. government debt is now showing some signs of the distress.
    • The CEO of AIA, the Asian division of AIG, has said he will quit if the company’s takeover by the UK’s Prudential goes through. He sees the deal as “unworkable.”
    • Markets seem to be predicting an Australian interest rate cut as a result of a slowing economy brought down by a drag on the country’s mining sector. The country, which was an early rate hiker, is now likely to cut rates.
    • Bonus: Kim Kardashian has admitted to plastic surgery, but only a little botox. She has denied ever having her “nose done.”

     

    Get This Delivered Straight To Your Inbox

    Signing up to get 10 Things You Need to Know Before the Opening Bell delivered to your inbox every morning is quick and easy.  Use the form below to enter your information then click the “Sign Up” button.

     

     

     

    Privacy Policy


    Please Note: Business Insider will never share your information with any other companies. You also have the ability to unsubscribe from these newsletters at any time simply by following the unsubscribe link located at the bottom of each email

     

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • Spring Learnings: Defensive Backs

    Jermale Hines would like to remind us all that he started in 8 games at safety last year.

    The loss of multi-year starters Kurt Coleman and Anderson Russell at safety combined with a spring game featuring a secondary that looked lost at times gives Ohio State fans the perfect opportunity to be concerned about something.

    During a summer with very few question marks on offense or defense, the secondary will certainly be a topic of conversation. But let’s face it, when half of your questions that need to be answered heading into fall practice involve your third wide receiver and running back, you are in pretty good shape.

    So even though the holes at safety and the apparent inability of Chekwa or Torrence to reach shut-down corner status are mildly concerning, count me as far from worried about it.

    Here are a few things that I learned this spring about the secondary.

    The secondary was hit the hardest (next to the offensive line) from being split up in the spring draft.

    It takes cohesion and teamwork in the secondary, and when your starting corners and soon-to-be starting safeties aren’t even playing on the same team with each other, can you really make a judgment about the secondary?

    The answer is no.

    Combine that with the defensive schemes being extremely limited and you have the ingredients for a bad showing from the secondary, regardless of the level of talent that you have.

    Long story short, take everything you think you learned about the secondary in the spring game and throw it out the window.

    Orhian Johnson was extremely impressive this spring.

    Instead of focusing on the spring game performances, I think a better indicator of things to come is how early and definitively Orhian Johnson locked down the starting safety spot next to Jermale Hines.

    What was supposed to be a battle in the spring quickly turned into a two man show. While Hines locking down a spot was not surprising, I expected the competition over the other safety spot to last the entire spring and into the fall.

    That didn’t happen and all of the competition in the secondary quickly moved to the star position. A week or two into practice and the coaching staff didn’t even pretend that the safety spots were still up for grabs.

    This indicates to me that Johnson was lights out, and hopefully we will see some big things from him this year.

    Stop worrying about the cornerbacks.

    Focusing entirely on football this spring should pay huge dividends for Torrence and the Buckeyes this fall.

    It is difficult for me to understand exactly what people are worried about with the cornerbacks. We have two returning starters who are both seniors and who both played above average last year.

    Neither of them really stood out, I will give you that, but at the same time, neither one consistently got beat either.

    Most of all, I don’t understand people’s concerns about Chekwa.

    Are we really still hung up on the fact that he got picked on by one of the best QB’s in college football over the past decade (Colt McCoy) in a bowl game two years ago?

    I say get over it, our cornerbacks are experienced and should be two of the best in the Big Ten.

    I can understand some mild worries about the secondary this summer, because really, what else is there to worry about?

    At the same time, the defensive front seven is going to be the secondary’s best friend (just like last year), so even if there are issues (which I think are either non-existent or greatly exaggerated) they should be masked.

    The secondary won’t be as good as the front seven next year, but that isn’t a fair comparison.

    I predict that our defense is going to be very, very good next season, and the secondary might not be a major reason why, but they will certainly do their part.

  • 25 Questions To Ask Anyone Who Is Delusional Enough To Believe That This Economic Recovery Is Real

    Via Prison Planet.com » Commentary

    The Economic Collapse
    May 25, 2010

    If you listen to the mainstream media long enough, you just might be tempted to believe that the United States has emerged from the recession and is now in the middle of a full-fledged economic recovery.  In fact, according to Obama administration officials, the great American economic machine has roared back to life, stronger and more vibrant than ever before.  But is that really the case?  Of course not.  You would have to be delusional to believe that.  What did happen was that all of the stimulus packages and government spending and new debt that Obama and the U.S. Congress pumped into the economy bought us a little bit of time.  But they have also made our long-term economic problems far worse.  The reality is that the U.S. cannot keep supporting an economy on an ocean of red ink forever.  At some point the charade is going to come crashing down. 

    And GDP is not a really good measure of the economic health of a nation.  For example, if you would have looked at the growth of GDP in the Weimar republic in the early 1930s, you may have been tempted to think that the German economy was really thriving.  German citizens were spending increasingly massive amounts of money.  But of course that money was becoming increasingly worthless at the same time as hyperinflation spiralled out of control.

    Well, today the purchasing power of our dollar is rapidly eroding as the price of food and other necessities continues to increase.  So just because Americans are spending a little bit more money than before really doesn’t mean much of anything.  As you will see below, there are a whole bunch of other signs that the U.S. economy is in very, very serious trouble. 

    Any “recovery” that the U.S. economy is experiencing is illusory and will be quite temporary.  The entire financial system of the United States is falling apart, and the powers that be can try to patch it up and prop it up for a while, but in the end this thing is going to come crashing down.

    But as obvious as that may seem to most of us, there are still quite a few people out there that are absolutely convinced that the U.S. economy will fully recover and will soon be stronger than ever.

    So the following are 25 questions to ask anyone who is delusional enough to believe that this economic recovery is real….  

    25 Questions To Ask Anyone Who Is Delusional Enough To Believe That This Economic Recovery Is Real 140410banner4

    #1) In what universe is an economy with 39.68 million Americans on food stamps considered to be a healthy, recovering economy?  In fact, the U.S. Department of Agriculture forecasts that enrollment in the food stamp program will exceed 43 million Americans in 2011.  Is a rapidly increasing number of Americans on food stamps a good sign or a bad sign for the economy?

    #2) According to RealtyTrac, foreclosure filings were reported on 367,056 properties in the month of March.  This was an increase of almost 19 percent from February, and it was the highest monthly total since RealtyTrac began issuing its report back in January 2005.  So can you please explain again how the U.S. real estate market is getting better?

    #3) The Mortgage Bankers Association just announced that more than 10 percent of U.S. homeowners with a mortgage had missed at least one payment in the January-March period.  That was a record high and up from 9.1 percent a year ago.  Do you think that is an indication that the U.S. housing market is recovering?

    #4) How can the U.S. real estate market be considered healthy when, for the first time in modern history, banks own a greater share of residential housing net worth in the United States than all individual Americans put together?

    #5) With the U.S. Congress planning to quadruple oil taxes, what do you think that is going to do to the price of gasoline in the United States and how do you think that will affect the U.S. economy?

    #6) Do you think that it is a good sign that Arnold Schwarzenegger, the governor of the state of California, says that “terrible cuts” are urgently needed in order to avoid a complete financial disaster in his state?

    #7) But it just isn’t California that is in trouble.  Dozens of U.S. states are in such bad financial shape that they are getting ready for their biggest budget cuts in decades.  What do you think all of those budget cuts will do to the economy?

    #8) In March, the U.S. trade deficit widened to its highest level since December 2008.  Month after month after month we buy much more from the rest of the world than they buy from us.  Wealth is draining out of the United States at an unprecedented rate.  So is the fact that the gigantic U.S. trade deficit is actually getting bigger a good sign or a bad sign for the U.S. economy?

    #9) Considering the fact that the U.S. government is projected to have a 1.6 trillion dollar deficit in 2010, and considering the fact that if you went out and spent one dollar every single second it would take you more than 31,000 years to spend a trillion dollars, how can anyone in their right mind claim that the U.S. economy is getting healthier when we are getting into so much debt?

    #10) The U.S. Treasury Department recently announced that the U.S. government suffered a wider-than-expected budget deficit of 82.69 billion dollars in April.  So is the fact that the red ink of the U.S. government is actually worse than projected a good sign or a bad sign?

    #11) According to one new report, the U.S. national debt will reach 100 percent of GDP by the year 2015.  So is that a sign of economic recovery or of economic disaster?

    #12) Monstrous amounts of oil continue to gush freely into the Gulf of Mexico, and analysts are already projecting that the seafood and tourism industries along the Gulf coast will be devastated for decades by this unprecedented environmental disaster.  In light of those facts, how in the world can anyone project that the U.S. economy will soon be stronger than ever?

    #13) The FDIC’s list of problem banks recently hit a 17-year high.  Do you think that an increasing number of small banks failing is a good sign or a bad sign for the U.S. economy?

    #14) The FDIC is backing 8,000 banks that have a total of $13 trillion in assets with a deposit insurance fund that is basically flat broke.  So what do you think will happen if a significant number of small banks do start failing?

    #15) Existing home sales in the United States jumped 7.6 percent in April.  That is the good news.  The bad news is that this increase only happened because the deadline to take advantage of the temporary home buyer tax credit (government bribe) was looming.  So now that there is no more tax credit for home buyers, what will that do to home sales? 

    #16) Both Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac recently told the U.S. government that they are going to need even more bailout money.  So what does it say about the U.S. economy when the two “pillars” of the U.S. mortgage industry are government-backed financial black holes that the U.S. government has to relentlessly pour money into?

    #17) 43 percent of Americans have less than $10,000 saved for retirement.  Tens of millions of Americans find themselves just one lawsuit, one really bad traffic accident or one very serious illness away from financial ruin.  With so many Americans living on the edge, how can you say that the economy is healthy?

    #18) The mayor of Detroit says that the real unemployment rate in his city is somewhere around 50 percent.  So can the U.S. really be experiencing an economic recovery when so many are still unemployed in one of America’s biggest cities?

    #19) Gallup’s measure of underemployment hit 20.0% on March 15th.  That was up from 19.7% two weeks earlier and 19.5% at the start of the year.  Do you think that is a good trend or a bad trend?

    #20) One new poll shows that 76 percent of Americans believe that the U.S. economy is still in a recession.  So are the vast majority of Americans just stupid or could we still actually be in a recession?

    #21) The bottom 40 percent of those living in the United States now collectively own less than 1 percent of the nation’s wealth.  So is Barack Obama’s mantra that “what is good for Wall Street is good for Main Street” actually true?

    #22) Richard Russell, the famous author of the Dow Theory Letters, says that Americans should sell anything they can sell in order to get liquid because of the economic trouble that is coming.  Do you think that Richard Russell is delusional or could he possibly have a point?

    #23) Defaults on apartment building mortgages held by U.S. banks climbed to a record 4.6 percent in the first quarter of 2010.  In fact, that was almost twice the level of a year earlier.  Does that look like a good trend to you?

    #24) In March, the price of fresh and dried vegetables in the United States soared 49.3% – the most in 16 years.  Is it a sign of a healthy economy when food prices are increasing so dramatically?

    #25) 1.41 million Americans filed for personal bankruptcy in 2009 – a 32 percent increase over 2008.  Not only that, more Americans filed for bankruptcy in March 2010 than during any month since U.S. bankruptcy law was tightened in October 2005.  So shouldn’t we at least wait until the number of Americans filing for bankruptcy is not setting new all-time records before we even dare whisper the words “economic recovery”?

  • Belief In Man-Made Climate Change Collapses In Britain & Germany

    Via Prison Planet.com » Sci Tech

    Climate Fears Turn to Doubts Among Britons

    ELISABETH ROSENTHAL
    NY Times
    May 25, 2010

    Last month hundreds of environmental activists crammed into an auditorium here to ponder an anguished question: If the scientific consensus on climate change has not changed, why have so many people turned away from the idea that human activity is warming the planet?

    Nowhere has this shift in public opinion been more striking than in Britain, where climate change was until this year such a popular priority that in 2008 Parliament enshrined targets for emissions cuts as national law. But since then, the country has evolved into a home base for a thriving group of climate skeptics who have dominated news reports in recent months, apparently convincing many that the threat of warming is vastly exaggerated.

    A survey in February by the BBC found that only 26 percent of Britons believed that “climate change is happening and is now established as largely manmade,” down from 41 percent in November 2009. A poll conducted for the German magazine Der Spiegel found that 42 percent of Germans feared global warming, down from 62 percent four years earlier.

    And London’s Science Museum recently announced that a permanent exhibit scheduled to open later this year would be called the Climate Science Gallery — not the Climate Change Gallery as had previously been planned.

    Full article here

    Belief In Man Made Climate Change Collapses In Britain & Germany 140410banner4

  • Britney Spears Frozen After Death?

    And now it’s time for another chuckle-worthy gem from the bastion of truth that is The Sun: Britney Spears supposedly wants to be frozen after her death so that she could be brought back to life when technology is advanced enough to bring her back to life.

    The “Break The Ice” singer wants her body to be preserved in liquid nitrogen at cryogenic temperature so that future generations can see her dancing routines if she is revived back to life, the outlandish tabloid report claims. In fact, the 28-year-old has already started investing in a foundation specializing in cryogenic freezing.

    “Britney gets these obsessions and this is the latest. It started when someone told her Walt Disney had been preserved by cryogenics to be revived in the future. That was a myth, but it got her researching the foundation and she became convinced it was worth a shot,” a Brit pal blabs. “Britney found the whole thing so interesting that she spent most of her Mother’s Day trip to Disneyland researching the subject on the internet.”

    The source adds: “Jamie is quite happy to let Britney have her little obsession. And if she wants to invest her money in cryogenics that’s fine, we’re only talking around $350,000 maximum. “However, much more than that and he may change his mind.”