Blog

  • USB HUB With Network

    OK this is a little device for special users and there are not to many out there that will need this but I am sure there are some.

    This is a 3 port USB HUB nothing special there the USB ports swivel so that it will be easier to plug your USB devices in. But it is more then just a HUB.

    Next to the USB ports it also offers an RJ45 network port. If you computer is missing an physical network port then this could be the solution. For instance if you have a Macbook Air with only 1 USB port then this is great it gives you a real network port and 3 USB ports instead of one.

    Have a closer look at this USB 2.0 3-PORT Hub with Ethernet

  • Kindred Spirits Sanctuary: horses!

    The following is a photo account of my trip to Kindred Spirits Sanctuary in Ocala, Florida.
    “Kindred Spirits is a non-profit farm animal sanctuary that helps neglected, abused, unwanted, or displaced farm animals.”

    This will be a 6-part series broken down by animals because each animal deserves their own spotlight.

    Part four is horses!










    Does this not look like a unicorn??




    Some of the horses at KSS were rescued from being euthanized only because they were no longer able to be ridden by humans. Apparently it happens all of the time.
    These guys were rescued from a starvation case. They were waiting to see the doctor, hence why they were not our running with the others.




    Want to help a horse live a happy, free life?

    From KSS website: Sponsoring a farm animal through Kindred Spirits Sanctuary is a win-win situation! People who care about these animals and their stories, but don’t have the time or space to adopt a farm animal, can still give a needy farm animal a great life! Sponsorships cover the cost of feed, shelter costs, and routine veterinary care for a particular animal for the duration you choose. You can sponsor an animal for an annual, bi-annual, quarter, or month duration. Each sponsorship is prepaid and does not renew automatically. By sponsoring a Kindred Spirit, you are assisting Kindred Spirits Sanctuary in providing the best care for each animal that makes his or her home here.


    One year: $900
    Six Months: $450
    Three Months: $225
    One Month: $75


    (As a side note, I was NOT asked by the sanctuary to provide this information on my blog. I’m only doing it because after my visit to the sanctuary, I truly believe in what they’re doing, and I know if my blog readers could visit that they would feel the same way. All of the information I’ve posted here is from my own personal account with visiting the sanctuary, and information from their website.)


  • Is iPad cannibalizing Windows PC sales?

    By Joe Wilcox, Betanews

    About a month ago I asked: “Will iPad cannibalize Mac sales?” Today’s report that iPad is outselling the Mac is another reason to ask. The answer may not come until Apple releases second calendar quarter results, to see whether there’s cannibalization or new revenue. Oh, but I can speculate, meantime.

    RBC Capital Markets analyst Mike Abramsky released a report indicating that Apple is now selling about 200,000 iPads a week, compared to 246,000 iPhone 3GSes and 110,000 Macs. Data is for United States. That puts iPad’s sales rate nearly double the Mac, and that’s with constrained tablet supplies. How much greater could they be if Apple met demand.

    I first saw the report in a post by All Things Digital’s John Paczkowski, earlier today. On May 17, Paczkowski answered my question, or perhaps thought he did, with post: “Is the iPad Cannibalizing Mac Sales? Not Really.” Piper Jaffray analyst Gene Munster asserted that, based on April US retail sales, “iPad has a minimal cannibalization impact on Mac sales, and could be slightly cannibalizing iPod sales.”

    But I wonder. Sales of a new product category typically come from completely new buyers or those buying the new thing instead of something else. The something else could be Macs, or even Windows PCs. As I asserted in late January: “iPad fills a gaping hole in the Mac product line between the aforementioned $399 and $999.” Various iPad models sell between $429 and $829. “Apple now offers portable computers — and that’s how I classify iPhone, iPod touch and iPad along with Macs — ranging from $99 to $2,499. From a pricing strategy perspective, iPad is a brilliant product, because it fills the gap between iPhone/iPod touch and Macbook without price cuts or risk to the Mac’s premium brand status.”

    The cheapest Mac you can buy today is iPad. It’s reasonable to ask if people who might otherwise buy a cheap Windows laptop are instead picking up iPad. It’s also reasonable to presume that iPad will also cannibalize some Mac sales, particularly as education sales begin to kick in later in the quarter. But it’s too early for there to be meaningful substantiating data, because:

    • Second calendar quarter tends to be stronger for Mac sales because of back-school-buying. However, iPad could reasonably appeal to educational institutions, particularly with budget cuts, as Macs.
    • About 45 percent of Apple sales are international, but iPad has only been available in the United States. The one market isn’t measure enough to long-term gauge whether or not iPad will eat away global Mac sales.
    • Apple is heavily marketing iPad, but not Macs. Early marketing could be just as likely to generate new sales as take them away from some other Apple product.
    • Second quarter typically is slowest of the year for Windows PC sales, although it’s typically strongest for Microsoft because of software license sales to businesses. Typical channel checks likely wouldn’t yet reveal whether sales sluggishness, if any, would be seasonal or lost sales to iPad.
    • Recent stories about iPad cannibalizing netbook sales are probably wrong. I’ve looked over the data, and netbook sales declines started around the release of Windows 7. At least through April, cheap Windows 7 laptops almost certainly sucked away sales from netbooks. The question: What happened since?

    So, I don’t yet have a definitive answer to either question. For Apple, the best two scenarios would be iPad opening a whole new revenue stream without cannibalizing Mac sales and/or iPad taking away new Windows PC sales. My educated guess based on years covering Apple: iPad is opening a new revenue stream and pulling in new sales from Windows users who couldn’t justifying $999 or more for a Mac. Additionally, I predict that iPad will cannibalize future Mac sales; people satisfied with the device will augment their existing Mac, delaying its replacement.

    Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2010



    Add to digg
    Add to Google
    Add to Slashdot
    Add to Twitter
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to Facebook
    Add to Technorati



  • Magic fabric

    Materials: 6.5 yards of Majken fabric

    Description: I folded the fabric directly in half and cut down the fold, making the two panels.

    To hem each side, I used Stitch Witchery. I followed the steps on the back of the packaging to adhere the 1/2″ hem on each side. No sewing machine for this project!

    I stapled one end of each panel to a thin 1×4″ (only $2!) that my husband cut down slightly narrower than the width of the panel.

    Then I coaxed him into using our extension ladder to scale the 18 foot wall, all the way up to the ceiling and screw the 1x4s into the wall. To make his life easier, and less death defying, he pre-screwed about five screws into each piece of wood so that he could use one hand to hold the 1×4 on the wall and the other hand screw the screws in. After securing one screw, he said that is was much easier to screw the others in because he didn’t have to hold the panel up anymore and could put all of his force into the other screws.

    One little tool that made the hanging process a breeze was this little laser level that I bought for him a few years ago. Rather than measuring placement on the wall at the top of the ladder, we propped this guy on the mirror and he beamed a straight and level line all the way up to the ceiling.

    A short while later, both panels were hanging and after about 30 seconds of staple-gunning were tacked to the wall.

    See more here. Also check out Jessi’s Poang chair repainting and Bonde TV unit turned sideboard.

    ~ Jessi @ The Design Slice, Chicago, Illinois


  • German Court Effectively Opens The Floodgates By Saying Software Patents Are Legal

    You may remember that, about six years ago, there was a push in Europe to have the EU Parliament legalize software patents. After a huge uproar among folks who understand just how damaging towards innovation software patents can be, the EU Parliament voted against the idea by a huge margin. Except… software patents are still finding their way into Europe. Last year, we wrote about how the UK was now recognizing software patents by saying that it’s not a pure software patent if it makes a “technical contribution,” whatever that means.

    Perhaps even more alarming is the news, found via Glyn Moody that a German court has effectively allowed a wide range of software patents. Previously, you could have very limited software patents only if they involved using “controllable forces of nature” to create a desired effect. Software usually did not qualify:


    By contrast, the new ruling of that court on the document generation program now sets the bar extremely low. It now basically says that a computer is a technical device per se and software that “takes into account” the characteristics of that computer is patentable. To give some examples, if you make sure you don’t allocate infinite amounts of memory (since every computer has limits in that respect), that might be enough. Or you ensure that you don’t use too much bandwidth over a network.

    So, as we sit and wait in the US for a ruling on Bilski, hoping (but doubting) that it will greatly curtail software patents, Germany is going in the opposite direction.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story





  • Netflix for iPad gets video output update

    Netflix have updated their iPad app to support the tablet’s video output functionality, meaning those users with Apple’s component, composite or VGA adapters will be able to hook up a bigger screen. Netflix for iPad v1.0.2 supports up to 1024 x 768 resolution, and is available as a free download.

    [Source: Everything iPad]

  • Google TV, the fusion of Internet and television

    Google TV, the fusion of Internet and television

    The Californian company announced today the launch of its own TV platform designed to revolutionize the way in which users are associated, on the second day of its annual developer meeting the Google I/O conference, where Google also released the latest version of the Android operating system for ’smartphones’, Android 2.2.

    Google TV was presented at the conference for developers in San Francisco and promises to “end the option to choose between television and the web.”

    Google TV is a new platform that will change the future of television,” said a Google official, Rishi Chandra.

    Through this new tool, users can search videos and view online TV channels, while surfing the Web via a keyboard connected to their monitor.



    Google TV, based in Android 2.1, will feature a powerful Intel will have WiFi connectivity, connect to your TV via the HDMI interface for high definition and can be controlled remotely with any smartphone with Android.

    The American company has enjoyed the cooperation of Sony and Logitech for this release that fuses TV with the new technologies.

    This technology would be accessible through internet-connected televisions, either directly or via a decoder.

    Google TV will be released in the coming months. In the world there are more than 1,000 million viewers, a good figure for the internet giant.

    The second big announcement of the Google I/O 2010 conference has been the release of Android 2.2, the new software revision for smartphones. The company focuses on more than twenty specific applications, including of which is the synchronization with Microsoft Exchange to view emails from Outlook.

    Related posts:

    1. Official Twitter App Now Available For Android Handsets
    2. Free Android Phones from Adobe and Google!
    3. Android OS Now To Feature On TV – Sony, Intel, Logitech Partners

  • SculptCAD Rapid Artist — Shane Pennington

    This post is the fifth in an ongoing series highlighting the artists behind the SculptCAD Rapid Artists Project. (Hit this link for all posts related to the project.)

    Shane is a contemporary artist in Dallas, Texas.  He has exhibited his work internationally in Sydney, Australia at the Paddington Contemporary Gallery and domestically at Gallery Works in Aspen, Colorado, HCG Gallery in Dallas, and his own SP Studio in Dallas, Texas.

    How did you get involved with the RAPID Artists project?

    I met Nancy Hairston at one of my art exhibits.  She liked my work and asked me to participate in the SculptCAD RAPID Artists Project.

    Is this your first experience with 3D/digital sculpting technology and tools?

    Yes.

    How have these technologies changed the way you approach your process?

    The technology has expanded my creative process because it has given me immediate access to materials and design in a virtual world.   Such an expansive library of options has expanded my thought process as well.  Many of the functions in the software allow you to create structures and shapes that would not be easy to create on a standard project.

    Are these digital tools having an effect on the work you are creating? Are the tools aiding/adding to/hindering the process?

    I have had a positive experience using the digital tools.  I did not know what to expect but as I became more familiar with the software, I was also becoming more cognizant of what tools and options I had at my fingertips.  The possibilities seem limitless.

    What are your thoughts on the SculptCAD Rapid Artists Project?

    I think it was an amazing project and experience.  I plan on using this technology more in my work now and in the future.

    Looking beyond the project, what do you have coming up in the near future art-wise? Do you have any shows or projects planned?

    I have site specific installations scheduled in Toronto, Montana, and Sydney.  I also have two upcoming shows in June and July in Dallas.

    How can people interested in your work get in touch with you?

    Website: www.shanepennington.com

    email: [email protected]

    phone: 214 564 6980

    Do you have any final thoughts on the Rapid Artists Project?

    Way to go!! Thanks to all that were involved and made this possible.  Special thanks to the Milwaukee School of Engineering and the University of Louisville and Forecast 3D for the printing of the SLA resin sculpture pieces. And a big thank you to Nancy Hairston and Kevin Atkins at SculptCAD for all their support within the project! … it has opened up an entire new creative realm and medium for turning ideas into art.

    Here’s the digital model of

    Shane’s SculptCAD Rapid Artist piece:

    "Darwin's Theory" by Shane Pennington, digital model

    Specifications on “Darwin’s Theory” and a statement on the piece from Shane:

    Darwin’s Theory,  H 40 in x W 36 in x L 30 in, 2010, Artist: Shane Pennington
    I am creating a tree and roots out of SLA White Resin to comment about the environment and the scarcity of natural rescues.  The top of the piece will be stylized cartoonish in nature and the roots will be a combination of real tree roots and synthetic roots.  Trees are the metaphor of this idea in this piece and the possibility of our need to synthetically recreate them in the future.

    Head below the fold for more of Shane’s work.

    Here is a still from a video piece by Shane, “Carmen’s Wish”:

    Still from Carmen's Wish by Shane Pennington

    Additional information on the piece:

    Carmen’s Wish, Digital video mixed with acrylic on canvas, H 156 in x W 120 in, Artist: Shane Pennington
    Installation at Chase Tower lobby in Dallas, Texas.

    And here’s another example of Shane’s work:

    "Joyous!" by Shane Pennington

    More information on the piece:

    Joyous!, The American Dream Series, H 120 in x W 72 in, Mixed Media Copper Wire Sculpture, 2009, Artist: Shane Pennington

  • MEDIA ADVISORY: WRI Hosts Briefing on New Initiative to Curb Illegal Wood Trade

    WHAT:

    Congressman Earl Blumenauer (D-Ore), leading environmental experts and industry leaders will brief journalists next Wednesday on a new initiative to curb trade in illegal wood. The event, moderated by Jonathan Lash, president of the World Resources Institute (WRI), will launch the Forest Legality Alliance (FLA), a global initiative to help companies remove illegal wood from their supply chains and reduce reputational risks. Panelists will also discuss new laws to combat illegal logging, including the amended U.S. Lacey Act.

    The initiative is spearheaded by WRI, the Environmental Investigation Agency (EIA) and the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). The founding alliance members are the American Forest & Paper Association, the Hardwood Federation, IKEA, the International Wood Products Association (IWPA), NewPage Corporation, the Retail Industry Leaders’ Association, Staples Inc., and the World Business Council for Sustainable Development. Spokespeople from each organization will be available for interviews following the event.

    WHO:
    Jonathan Lash, president, WRI
    Earl Blumenauer, congressman, Oregon
    Allan Thornton, president, EIA
    Mark Suwyn, chairman, NewPage Corporation
    Brent McClendon, executive vice president, IWPA
    Alexandria L. Panehal, acting deputy assistant administrator, Bureau of Economic Growth, Agriculture and Trade, USAID

    WHEN:
    Wednesday, May 26, 2010
    1:00 p.m. to 2:00 p.m. EST
    (Lunch will be served at 12:30 p.m.)

    WHERE:
    World Resources Institute
    10 G Street NE Suite 800, Washington, DC 20002
    (Metro: Red Line to Union Station)

    Call-in Details
    1-800-610-4500 (Toll Free in USA and Canada)
    1-702-851-3339 (for callers outside USA and Canada)
    Passcode: 5184429

    Live Webcast: http://www.wri.org/news/webcasts
    Email questions to Camilo Ramirez at cramirez@wri.org

    RSVP: Jessica Forres, WRI media officer, +1(202)729-7736, jforres@wri.org

  • Cops Spot The Salahis Near The White House

    Does it come as a surprise to anyone that Tareq and Michaele Salahi — the notorious White House party poopers who feigned their way into The Obamas’ first State Dinner– were nabbed near 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. during Wednesday night’s star-studded dinner redux?

    A Secret Service spokesman tells CNN.com that a limo with the future reality stars inside was stopped just a couple of blocks from The White House last night after the driver ran a red light. Shortly thereafter, The Salahis were spotted at a restaurant a few blocks from The White House with a group of friends, photographers, and cameramen in tow.

    Michaele and Tareq caused an embarrassing security flap at the White House when they finessed their way into the State Dinner for India’s president last November.


  • Google: Android Market Now has More than 50,000 Android Apps

    Google announced today the Android Market has more then 50,000 Android Apps. About a month ago in a profit report Google announced more than 38,000 Android Apps and we’re seeing the rapid growth rate. AndroLib.com, third party Android Market viewer website, has the Android app count at over 60,000. Either way we’ll see well more than 100,000 Android Apps before years end!

    Algadon Free Online RPG. Fully Mobile Friendly.

  • SMBC shows why I don’t believe in time travel | Bad Astronomy

    smbc_timetravelIf you don’t read Saturday Morning Breakfast Cereal, then you are a pinko commie*. Or a socialist. I dunno; I get these political epithets mixed up.

    Anyway, today’s was great, as usual. But I wonder who this Professor Thorne is…?




    * Zach Weiner, it turns out, is a feudal anarchist. Serf’s up!


  • Tax fraud plagues carbon trading program

    Environmental News Network: The same thing occurred again this past April, albeit on a larger scale, involving 22 people in the United Kingdom (13 in England, eight in Scotland, and one detained on an E.U. arrest warrant) as well as an unreported number so far in Germany. The investigation also overflowed into other E.U. countries, namely Belgium, the Czech Republic, Cyprus, Denmark, Finland, Norway, Portugal, Spain and the Netherlands.

    In Germany, officials and tax investigators swept 230 offices and residences, including Deutsche Bank AG, Munich-based HVB Group (the second largest private German financial institution
    and retail bank), and RWE AG, a German electric and natural gas public utility headquartered in Essen.

    All detentions and raids across the European Union occurred on April 28 in an aggressive attempt to round up carbon emissions trading cheaters at every level. In this particular sweep, Germany is looking at 180 million euros ($239 million) in tax evasions by 150 individuals at 50 companies. In the United Kingdom, the Revenue & Customs office, or HMRC, targeted 81 sites.

    The VAT tax varies according to the E.U. country levying it, and the product or the nature of the service delivered. Thus it is possible to buy carbon credits without the tax (or at a lower tax rate, i.e., Poland), and resell them in high-VAT countries.

    The E.U. carbon emissions trading fraud is huge, but perhaps nothing compared to the potential for cheating that will become available in the United States once Waxman-Markey, or some similar scheme for reducing carbon emissions, emerges from the Senate to become law.

    Read more>>

  • The Future of Google TV is..

    Google TV is going to be very interesting. It is far  from a certainty that it will be more than Apple TV in terms of consumer sales.   From a first glance the Marketplace is the most important and interesting element of the announcement.  As a development platform, Android creates the potential for untold  unique and interesting applications that could capture users imagination.  Early on, I don’t think TV oriented apps will have the most impact. If  I understood the announcement, in the beginning of 2011, there will be an Android Marketplace. The money and the opportunity won’t be in TV apps. It will be in gaming and social apps. The low hanging fruit will be in taking apps that work on facebook and Iphone/Pad and moving them (if they haven’t already) to the Android platform and upsizing them to take advantage of working on a big screen.

    The Google TV box could be a very cool and hopefully inexpensive gaming console. That is where the money will be.

    What about TV ?

    The success of Google TV will come down to one thing….PageRank.  Can you imagine the white hat and black hat SEO battles that will take place as video content providers try to get to the top of the TV Search Listings on Google TV ?  Like Google said, there are 4 billion TVs and growing and the US TV Ad market is $70 BILLION. There is a lot at stake if Google TV takes off. How Google does its PageRank for this product  will have a bigger impact on the success of the product in the TV market than anything else it does.

    If you search for “House” on your Google TV and it returns a Youtube Video of some kid doing a parody of the Fox tv show House, you can bet the shit is going to hit the fan. Not that Fox or any big media company will sue Google. I don’t think they will. What will happen is that they will “turn off” the Google TV Chrome Browser, just as they did to Boxee.  They will fight and possibly sue over what meta data is used to determine search results. It will be a mess.  That would kill the product because if it doesn’t work with the TV shows you want to watch, why buy it ?

    On the flipside if the best Google offers users is what they showed in today’s demo,  returning 5 or fewer results from a search with content from the cable/sat provider showing first and possibly consuming all 5 results, every internet content creator is going to scream loud and long at Google for putting them at a disadvantage.  No one is going to be able to find your video if you show traditional TV shows first and  dont show more than 5 results. They aren’t going to be satisfied with referrals or Google Suggestions as their only access to Google TV users. They are going to claim that this is all  just a ruse to get them to advertise and that Google sold out to big media.

    Even if Google lets the user decide how to rank results, it creates too much risk for TV content providers and their distributors. More mess.

    On the other other side, if traditional TV makes it to the top, Google TV is the best thing to ever happen to Cable , Satellite and Telco TV providers. Why ? Google just solved their biggest problems, their user interface and programming guide. Not only that, if Google TV is what big content providers and distributors consider to be a good partner, they just off loaded much of the future R&D for the set top box to Google and its partners and developers. Should cable and companies adopt Android on their set top boxes ? They will watch and decide. Even better for the TV Providers, maximum utility from the  Google TV comes from having a TV subscription. They may actually gain subscribers as a result of this product. Which is exactly why Charlie Ergen had Dish Network participate. Its win win win for Dish Network

    Google TV isn’t the answer. It’s the question.  I’m sure Apple, Microsoft and even Facebook have an opinion on the announcement. Their response will be even more interesting.

    The Future of TV is….. TV. But Google sure sped up the timeline today.

  • City IG says minority, women firms shorted 15 percent on contracts

    Posted by John Byrne at 2:08 p.m.

    Minority- and women-owned businesses were paid $19 million less than they were supposed to get under city contracts two years ago because of widespread fraud, abuse and mismanagement of the city’s affirmative action program, according to a report released today by the city inspector general’s office.



    That represented a 15 percent shortfall during 2008, the report stated. If that kind of shortfall were extended over 15 years, starting in 1995, minority- and women-owned businesses would have lost $400 million, it concluded.

    Widespread fraud, abuse and mismanagement of the city’s affirmative action contract program caused minority- and women-owned businesses to be paid 15 percent less than they were supposed to get in a recent analysis of construction contracts by the city Inspector General’s Office, a shortfall that could reach $400 million over the past 15 years.



    Inspector General Joseph Ferguson criticized the city in a report released today for not tracking actual payments to the firms that have won city contracts as part of a program started in the 1980s to diversify the companies getting public work.



    "The city’s failure to collect all relevant data, its inconsistent application of the program’s rules and regulations, and a lack of cooperation between the user departments and the Department of Procurement Services have all contributed to the program’s poor administration," Ferguson writes.



    City officials should consider directly paying subcontractors to prevent firms from using minority-owned "fronts" to get city work, then cutting them out of the actual projects, Ferguson writes.

  • Accordion Players Step into the L.A. Spotlight

    Get ready to unleash your inner Weird Al Yankovic and sign up for the Roland U.S. V-Accordion Festival!

    This headbanging event will be held in Los Angeles (home to the Van Halen, Motley Crue, Ratt, and other well-known accordion-influenced bands) on Saturday, September 18. Aspiring accordion artists can submit application videos until July 15.

    If that dusty old thing you found in Grandpa Hertzel’s attic isn’t cutting it anymore, you can pick up a snazzy new Roland V-Accordion. The company features 14 models, ranging in price from about $1,300 to $3,600. You can even rock a threatening instrument like the white-with-tribal-accents Fr-1b accordion pictured here.

    Don’t forget, guitar virtuoso Steve Vai started his musical career as an accordion player. So add some waltz machines into your gadget arsenal.


  • The Net Worth of the U.S. Presidents: Washington to Obama

    one dollar.jpg

    Having examined the finances of all 43 presidents (yes, 43; remember, Cleveland was president twice), we calculated the net worth figures for each in 2010 dollars. Because a number of presidents, particularly in the early 19th Century, made and lost huge fortunes in a matter of a few years, the number for each man is based on his net worth at its peak.

    We have taken into account hard assets like land, estimated lifetime savings based on work history, inheritance, homes, and money paid for services, which include things as diverse as their salary as Collector of Customs at the Port of New York to membership on Fortune 500 boards. Royalties on books have also been taken into account, along with ownership of companies and yields from family estates.

    The net worth of the presidents varies widely. George Washington was worth more than half a billion in today’s dollars. Several presidents went bankrupt.

    The fortunes of American presidents are tied to the economy in the eras in which they lived. For the first 75 years after Washington’s election, presidents generally made money on land, crops, and commodity speculation. A president who owned hundreds or thousands of acres could lose most or all of his property after a few years of poor crop yields. Wealthy Americans occasionally lost all of their money through land speculation–leveraging the value of one piece of land to buy additional property. Since there was no reliable national banking system and almost no liquidity in the value of private companies, land was the asset likely to provide the greatest yield, if the property yielded enough to support the costs of operating the farm or plantation.

    Because there was no central banking system and no commodities regulatory framework, markets were subject to panics.

    The panic of 1819 was caused by the deep indebtedness of the federal government and a rapid drop in the price of cotton. The immature banking system was forced to foreclose on many farms. The value of the properties foreclosed upon was often low, because land without a landowner meant land without a crop yield.

    The panic of 1837 caused a depression that lasted six years. It was triggered by a weak wheat crop, a drop in cotton prices, and a leverage bubble in the value of land created by speculation. These factors caused the U.S. economy to go through a multi-year period of deflation.

    The sharp fluctuations in the fortunes of the first 14 presidents were a result of the economic times.

    Beginning with Millard Fillmore in 1850, the financial history of the presidency entered a new era. Most presidents were lawyers who spent years in public service. They rarely amassed large fortunes and their incomes were often almost entirely from their salaries. From Fillmore to Garfield, these American presidents were distinctly middle class. These men often retired without the money to support themselves in a fashion anywhere close to the one that they had as president. Buchanan, Lincoln, Johnson, Grant, Hayes, and Garfield had almost no net worth at all.

    The rise of inherited wealth in the early 20th Century contributed to the fortunes of many presidents, including Theodore Roosevelt, Franklin D. Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy, and both of the Bushes. The other significant change to the economy was the advent of large professionally organized corporations. These corporations produced much of the oil, mining, financial, and railroad fortunes amassed at the end of the 19th Century and the beginning of the 20th. The Kennedys were wealthy because of the financial empire built by Joseph Kennedy. Herbert Hoover made millions of dollars as the owner of mining companies.

    The stigma of making money from being a retired president also began to disappear. Calvin Coolidge made a large income from his newspaper column. Gerald Ford, who had almost no money when he was a Congressman made a small fortune from serving on the boards of large companies. Clinton made millions of dollars from writing his autobiography.

    We analyzed presidential finances based on historical sources. Most media evaluations of the net worth of presidents have come up with a very wide range, a spread in which the highest figure was often several times the lowest estimate. Most sources provided no hard figures at all. Most of these efforts have focused largely on the analysis of recent chief executives. That is because it is much easier to calculate figures in a world where assets and incomes are a matter of public record.

    One of the most important conclusions of this analysis is that the presidency has little to do with wealth. Several brought huge net worths to the job. Many lost most of their fortunes after leaving office. Some never had any money at all.

    President and Term Estimated Net Worth 
    1st George Washington (1789-1797) $525 million His Virginia plantation, “Mount Vernon,” consisted of five separate farms on 8,000 acres of prime farmland, run by over 300 slaves. His wife, Martha Washington, inherited significant property from her father. Washington made significantly more than subsequent presidents: his salary was two percent of the total U.S. budget in 1789.
    2nd John Adams (1797-1801) $19 million Adams received a modest inheritance from his father. His wife, Abigail Adams, was a member of the Quincys, a prestigious Massachusetts family. Adams owned a handsome estate in Quincy, Massachusetts, known as “Peacefield,” a working farm, covering approximately 40 acres. He also had a thriving law practice.
    3rd Thomas Jefferson (1801-1809) $212 million Jefferson was left 3,000 acres and several dozen slaves by his father. “Monticello,”
    his home on a 5,000 acre plantation in Virginia, was one of the architectural wonders of its time. He made significant money in various political positions before becoming president, but was mired in debt towards the end of his life.
    4th James Madison (1809-1817) $101 million Madison was the largest landowner in Orange County, Virginia, with land holding consisting of 5,000 acres and the “Montpelier” estate. He made significant money as secretary of state and president. Madison lost money at the end of his life due to the steady financial collapse of his plantation.
    5th James Monroe (1817-1825) $27 million Monroe’s wife, Elizabeth, was the daughter of wealthy British officer. He made significant money during eight years as president, but entered retirement severely in debt and was forced to sell Highland plantation, which included 3500 acres.
    6th John Quincy Adams (1825-1829) $21 million Adams inherited most of his father’s land. His wife was the daughter of a wealthy merchant. He devoted most of his adult life to public service, notably after leaving office.
    7th Andrew Jackson (1829-1837) $119 million While he was considered to be in touch with the average middle class American, Jackson quietly became one of the wealthiest presidents of the 1800’s. “Old Hickory” married into wealth and made money in the military. His homestead “The Hermitage” included 1,050 acres of prime real estate. Over the course of his life, he owned as many as 300 slaves. Jackson entered significant debt later in life.
    8th Martin Van Buren (1837-1841) $26 million Van Buren made substantial income as an attorney. He was one of only two men to serve as secretary of state, vice president, and president. He owned the 225-acre “Lindenwald” estate in upstate New York.
    9th William Henry Harrison (1841) $5 million Harrison married into money – wife’s father was prominent judge and landowner. When Harrison’s mother died, he inherited 3,000 acres near Charles City, Virginia, which he later sold to his brother. He also owned “Grouseland” mansion and property, in Vincennes, Indiana. Despite his assets, Harrison died penniless, causing Congress to create a special pension for his widow.
    10th John Tyler (1841-1845) $51 million Tyler Inherited 1,000-acre tobacco plantation. His first wife, Letitia, was wealthy. Tyler bought “Sherwood Manor,” a 1,600 acre estate, previously owned by William Henry Harrison. He became indebted during the Civil War and died poor.
    11th James Knox Polk (1845-1849) $10 million Like his wife, Sarah Childress, Polk’s father was a wealthy plantation owner and speculator. Polk made significant sums as speaker of the house and governor of Tennessee, and owned 920 acres in Coffeeville, Mississippi, as well as 25 slaves.
    President and Term Estimated Net Worth
    12th Zachary Taylor (1849-1850) $6 million Taylor inherited significant amounts of land from his family, which at one point included property in Mississippi, Kentucky, and Louisiana. He made substantial money in land speculation, the leasing of warehouses, and investments in bank and utility stocks. Taylor owned a sizeable plantation in Mississippi and a home in Baton Rouge.
    13th Millard Fillmore (1850-1853) $4 million Neither Fillmore nor his wife had significant inheritance. He founded a college that is the current State University of New York at Buffalo, and his primary holding was a house in nearby East Aurora, NY.
    14th Franklin Pierce (1853-1857) $2 million Pierce’s father was frontier farmer, and his wife was well-to-do aristocrat. He served as attorney for 16 years and held property in concord, NH.
    15th James Buchanan (1857-1861) less than $1 million Born in log cabin in Pennsylvania, Buchanan was one of 11 children. He was the only president never to marry. He worked for nine years as attorney, and spent 16 years in public office, including four years as secretary of state.
    16th Abraham Lincoln (1861-1865) less than $1 million To the log cabin born. Lincoln served as an attorney for 17 years before his presidency. He owned a single-family home in Springfield, Illinois.
    17th Andrew Johnson (1865-1869) less than $1 million Johnson’s father was a tailor, and his wife was a shoemaker. He served the public for 20 years, including as Governor of Tennessee and U.S. Senator. Johnson owned a small house in Greenville, TN.
    18th Ulysses Simpson Grant (1869-1877) less than $1 million Grant’s father was a tanner, and his wife was the daughter of a wealthy merchant. He lost his entire fortune when swindled by his investing partner. Grant owned a modest home in Galena, Illinois. Although he died with little money, his autobiography kept family afloat.
    19th Rutherford Birchard Hayes, (1877-1881) $3 million Hayes’ father was a shopkeeper. He was an attorney for 15 years and owned “Spiegel Grove,” a 10,000 square foot home that sat on 25 acres in Fremont, Ohio. Hayes also served as Governor of Ohio and was a member of the House.
    20th James Abram Garfield (1881) less than $1 million Garfield was born in a log cabin in Ohio. He spent 18 years in the House of Representatives. Garfield owned “Lawnfield,” a home and small property in Mentor, Ohio. He died penniless.
    21st Chester Alan Arthur (1881-1885) less than $1 million The son of an Irish preacher, Arthur’s wife came a from military family. He made substantial sums as Collector for the Port of New York. His townhouse in New York was well-appointed with furniture commission from Tiffany.
    22nd and 24th Grover Cleveland (1885-1889, 1893-1897) $25 million Cleveland’s father was a bookseller and preacher, and his wife was the daughter of wealthy lawyer. Cleveland served as an attorney for twelve years, and also made significant sums on sale of his estate outside of Washington, D.C. He bought “Westland Mansion” near Princeton, New Jersey.

    President and Term Estimated Net Worth

    23rd Benjamin Harrison (1889-1893) $5 million Harrison had no significant inheritance of his own or from his wife’s family. He was a highly paid attorney for 18 years, and served as attorney for Republic of Venezuela. Harrison owned large Victorian home in Indianapolis, Indiana.
    25th William McKinley (1897-1901) $1 million Mckinley had no significant inheritance. Served 30 years in public office, including local prosecutor and member of the House of Representatives. Went bankrupt during depression of 1893 while he was Governor of Ohio.
    26th Theodore Roosevelt (1901-1909) $125 million Born to a prominent and wealthy family, Roosevelt received a significant trust fund. He lost most of his money on a ranching venture in the Dakotas and had to work as an author to pay bills. Roosevelt spent most of his adult years in public service. His 235-acre estate, “Sagamore Hill,” sits on some of the most valuable real estate on Long Island.
    27th William Howard Taft (1909-1913) $3 million Taft’s wife’s father was a law partner of former president, Rutherford B. Hayes. Taft was president of the American Bar Association, an active attorney for nearly two decades, and only president to serve on the U.S. Supreme Court.
    28th Woodrow Wilson (1913-1921) less than $1 million Wilson received modest compensation as head of Princeton and Governor of New Jersey. He never served in any position that provided him with a reasonable income. Wilson had a stroke in office and died five years later.
    29th Warren Gamaliel Harding (1921-1923) $1 million Harding obtained wealth through marriage to his wife Mabel, daughter of a prominent banker. He owned the Marion Daily Star and a small home in Marion, Ohio. Most of Harding’s net worth came from his newspaper ownership.
    30th Calvin Coolidge (1923-1929) less than $1 million Coolidge’s father was prosperous farmer and storekeeper. “Silent Cal” Spent five years as an attorney, and almost two decades in public office, which included time as Governor of Massachusetts. His net worth derived primarily from his home, “The Beeches,” in Northampton, Massachusetts, the advance from his autobiography, and the money he made from his newspaper column.
    31st Herbert Clark Hoover (1929-1933) $75 million An orphan, Hoover was raised by his uncle, a doctor. He made a fortune as a mining company executive, had a very large salary for 17 years and had extensive holdings in mining companies. Hoover donated his presidential salary to charity. He also owned “Hoover House” in Monterey, California.
    32nd Franklin Delano Roosevelt (1933-1945) $60 million Roosevelt had wealth through inheritance and marriage. He owned the 800-acre “Springwood” estate as well as properties in Georgia, Maine, and New York. In 1919, his mother had to bail him out of financial difficulty. He spent most of his adult life in public service. Before he was president, Roosevelt was appointed assistant secretary of the navy by Wilson.
    33rd Harry S. Truman (1945-1953) less than $1 million Truman was a haberdasher in Missouri and nearly went bankrupt. He served 18 years in Washington, D.C. Despite his modest income, he was able to save some of his presidential salary.
    President and Term Estimated Net Worth
    34th Dwight David Eisenhower (1953-1961) $ 8 million Eisenhower had no inherited wealth. He served the majority of his career in the military and five years as president of Columbia. Ike owned a large farm near Gettysburg, Pennsylvania.
    35th John Fitzgerald Kennedy (1961-1963) Although he never inherited his father’s fortune, the Kennedy family estate was worth nearly $1 billion dollars. Born into great wealth, Kennedy’s wife was oil heiress. His Father was one of the wealthiest men in America, and was the first chairman of the SEC. Almost all of JFK’s income and property came from trust shared with other family members.
    36th Lyndon Baines Johnson (1963-1969) $98 Million Johnson’s father lost all of the family’s money when LBJ was a boy. Over time, he accumulated 1,500 acres in Blanco County, Texas, which included his home, called the “Texas White House.” He and his wife owned a radio and television station in Austin, TX, and had a variety of other moderate holdings, including livestock and private aircraft.
    37th Richard Milhous Nixon (1969-1974) $15 million Nixon was born without any inheritance, and was a public servant for most of his life including a term as a Senator from California. “Tricky Dick” made significant sums from series of interviews with David Frost and book advances. He sold his New York townhouse to the Syrian ambassador to the U.S. and purchased a large home in Saddle River, NJ. At various times, Nixon also owned real estate in California and Florida.
    38th Gerald Rudolph Ford Jr. (1974-1977) $7 million Ford had no inheritance, and he spent virtually his entire adult life in public service. Over the course of his lifetime, he owned properties in Michigan, Rancho Mirage, and Beaver Creek, Colorado. After he left the White House in 1976, he made nearly $1 million a year from book advances and from serving on the boards of several prominent American companies.
    39th James Earl Carter, 1977-1981 $7 million Carter was the son of a prominent Georgia businessman. He was a peanut farmer for almost two decades. Carter left office deeply in debt, but made substantial sums from writing 14 books. Part of a family partnership that owns 2,500 acres in Georgia.
    40th Ronald Wilson Reagan, 1981-89 (Republican) $13 million Reagan had no inheritance, but his first wife, an actress, had her own money. He was a movie and television actor for over two decades. “The Gipper” owned several pieces of real estate over his lifetime, including 688-acre property near Santa Barbara, California. Reagan was highly paid for his autobiography and as a GE spokesman.
    41st George Herbert Walker Bush (1989-1993) $23 million Bush was the son of Prescott Bush, a Connecticut Senator and successful businessman. Aided by his friends in the financial community, he made a number of successful investments. One of his major assets is his home and 100+ acre estate in Kennebunkport, Maine.
    42nd William Jefferson Clinton (1993- 2001) $38 million Clinton was born with no inheritance, and he made little significant money during 20 plus years of public service. After his time in White House, however, he made a substantial income as an author and public speaker. Clinton received large advance from autobiography. His wife, the secretary of state, has also made money as author.
    43rd George W. Bush (2001-2008) $20 million Bush was born into a wealthy family. Over ten years, he made substantial sums of money in the oil business. The largest contribution to his net worth was the profitable sale of the Texas Rangers.
    44th Barack Hussein Obama (2008-present) $5 million Obama is the grandson of a goat herder. He is a former constitutional law professor and civil rights attorney. Book royalties constitute most of Obama’s net worth.

    Michael B. Sauter, Ashley C. Allen, and Douglas A. McIntyre are editors of 24/7 Wall St.





    Email this Article
    Add to digg
    Add to Reddit
    Add to Twitter
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to StumbleUpon
    Add to Facebook



  • Hide The Children: The KFC Double Down Is Here To Stay

    This Sunday, May 23, was to have been the final day for grease and salt lovers everywhere to get their hands on the KFC Double Down, which for the two of you just waking from comas is a bacon and cheese sandwich that uses fried chicken as the bread. But before you go and unclog your arteries, KFC has just announced that the Double Down ain’t going anywhere anytime soon.

    Says some guy who works for the Colonel:

    This truly an example of ‘popular demand’…Our plans were to feature the product only through May 23, but millions of Double Down fans have spoken and we won’t disappoint them. You’ll continue to be able to get the Double Down at KFC this summer.

    KFC says it expects to sell its 10 millionth Double Down later this month.

    After months of test-marketing in pockets around the country, the much-discussed sandwich hit the streets on April 12. It has spawned several imitators and spin-offs, including:

    * The Krispy Kreme Double Down
    * The Vegan Double Down
    * The Diabetes-Friendly Double Downs

    KFC Double Down Fans, Rejoice: Your Favorite Bunless Chicken Sandwich is Staying on the Menu!

  • GUESS THE CLOSE

    andrew trader

    Ok, no prize today, just bragging rights.

    Get your S&P close answer in by 3:30.

    Good luck!

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • Google Is Leapfrogging Apple [GoogleIo]

    Google is done playing catch-up. Today they’re setting the agenda: With Android Froyo, Google TV, mobile ads and streaming media, Google isn’t just matching Apple—they’re taking the lead. More »