Blog

  • PRPS – Autumn/Winter 2010

    PRPS has experienced a lot of growth since in the denim industry. With their standards always at a high quality in terms of construction, the brand looks to workwear pieces to evolve their styles for Autumn/Winter 2010. There’s a rugged feel to the collection with torn denim, sherpa lined denim jackets, khaki coats, denim shirts, and plaid tops. PRPS should be a popular mainstay in the denim brand list, especially if your looking towards the more Japanese quality type that true aficionados look for.

    Continue reading for more images.






    Source: Denim Geek


  • Infiniti bringing two new M-based models to Pebble Beach

    Filed under: , , ,

    Infiniti M Coupe Sketches – Click above for high-res image

    For the past two years, Infiniti has been growing its presence in Pebble Beach. The week-long auto extravaganza in August plays host to a number of automaker events, but recently, Infiniti has been taking center stage. For 2010, Nissan’s premium channel isn’t letting up, bringing two M-based models to the party in Pebble, both of which are slated for production.

    We don’t have specifics on either model, but in addition to the image above, our sources within Infiniti tell us that the new coupe variants will be extensions of its current lineup, lending credence to recent rumors of an M coupe.

    More interestingly, we’ve been told that both models will “extend Infiniti into an area we haven’t been before” and that one of those models will be more “performance oriented.” If that means we can expect some kind of powertrain similar to the Essence Concept that debuted at the Geneva Motor Show last year – a twin-turbo, direct injected V6 putting out over 450 horsepower – consider our interest incredibly piqued.

    Both models are set to go on sale in October or November of this year, with the M35 Hybrid arriving sometime toward the end of 2011.

    Infiniti bringing two new M-based models to Pebble Beach originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 19 May 2010 12:29:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments

  • No FinReg Cloture Vote Today; Dodd Withdraws Punt on Derivatives

    There’s a ton of last-minute changes currently happening to Sen. Chris Dodd’s (D-Conn.) financial regulatory reform bill.  Below are my updates on the most important ones.

    First: No cloture vote at 2 p.m. The Senate will vote on amendments instead, and the bill will still be up for debate. Notably, this means that Senators can propose and get votes on new amendments, not just secondary or already-offered ones.

    Second: Dodd says that he will withdraw his amendment pushing off consideration of Sen. Blanche Lincoln’s (D-Ark.) derivatives language for two years. If adopted, Lincoln’s proposal would go into effect as written.

    Third: Read Mike Konczal for an explanation of Sens. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.) and Carl Levin’s (D-Mich.) amendment on the Volcker Rule. The Dodd bill as-is punts on the question of forcing banks to break up commercial and investment banking functions, though a broad swath of economists, public policy scholars and market experts believe it is one of the better ways to keep banking safe. The Merkley-Levin amendment would more quickly institute a stronger version. Initially, it seemed the amendment would not come up for a vote due to some parliamentary procedural politicking yesterday. (See David Dayen for a run-down.)

    Now, Merkley and Levin have tacked their amendment onto Sen. Sam Brownback’s (R-Kans.) amendment exempting automakers from Consumer Financial Protection Agency rulings — basically forcing a vote on their amendment. (Since the cloture vote will not happen today, though, I wonder if Merkley and Levin will not attempt to reapply it as a primary stand-alone amendment.)

    Finally: Watch the floor debate here.

  • VIDEO: Construction on the new office continues.

    Construction on the new office continues.

  • Google open-sources Web video codec; Mozilla, Opera, Adobe sign on

    By Scott M. Fulton, III, Betanews

    Banner: Breaking News

    This afternoon, Google has opted for the most daring option available to it: It is making available both the technology and the source code for the VP8 codec it acquired, in its buyout of On2 Technologies, to a newly formed entity. That entity, the newly formed WebM Project, will then serve as a licensing agent on Google’s behalf for the VP8 video codec, the Vorbis audio codec, and the Matroska multimedia container, for royalty-free use, apparently in both free and commercial video.

    At least as extraordinary, if not more so, is the new WebM group’s list of charter supporters, which could be unofficially dubbed the “Everyone Except H.264 Coalition.” Browser makers Mozilla and Opera both appear on this list, along with Adobe, the maker of Flash — the Web’s most prevalent distribution system for streaming video. And on the hardware side, both AMD (parent of ATI) and Nvidia have signed on, along with all the principal players in handheld components: ARM, Freescale, Marvell, TI, and Qualcomm.

    Now, not only will VP8 become part of Google’s YouTube experiment with HTML 5 — as the newly launched WebM site confirmed today — but at least three of the world’s top 5 browsers will likely incorporate the WebM portfolio soon, and we can apparently (unless someone pulls that Flash logo off of the WebM site for some reason) expect Adobe Flash to provide the “other” browsers with the WebM support they would lack. It’s a deal that literally sews up all the loose ends, and if it works, would completely unify all opposition against the last holdouts for proprietary video on the Web: Microsoft, Apple, and Intel.

    In a statement released this afternoon, a Mozilla spokesperson confirmed that organization’s participation in the project.

    “Until today, Theora was the only production-quality codec that was usable under terms appropriate for the open Web,” reads a blog post moments ago from Mozilla chief evangelist Mike Shaver. “Now we can add another, in the form of VP8: providing better bandwidth efficiency than H.264, and designed to take advantage of hardware from mobile devices to powerful multicore desktop machines, it is a tremendous technology to have on the side of the open web. VP8 and WebM promise not only to commoditize state-of-the-art video quality, but also to form the basis of further advances in video for the Web.”

    Google developed its license terminology for the VP8 codec in WebM based in large part, it says, on the BSD license. An excerpt reads: “Subject to the terms and conditions of the above License, Google hereby grants to You a perpetual, worldwide, non-exclusive, no-charge, royalty-free, irrevocable (except as stated in this section) patent license to make, have made, use, offer to sell, sell, import, and otherwise transfer this implementation of VP8, where such license applies only to those patent claims, both currently owned by Google and acquired in the future, licensable by Google that are necessarily infringed by this implementation of VP8.”

    That means a licensee can indeed sell implementations of commercial software products that include VP8. This is where Google is now playing with fire, as the company’s rights to do so may be challenged, as Betanews learned last month. Rights holders to video technology may claim that neither Google nor anyone else has the right to give away basic concepts that On2 at one time did have, or may have had, the right to sell.

    Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2010



    Add to digg
    Add to Google
    Add to Slashdot
    Add to Twitter
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to Facebook
    Add to Technorati



  • Dan Chiasson on Lydia Davis

    chiasson_1-042910.jpg

    Lydia Davis, Rensselaer County, New York, May 2009

    Dan Chiasson reads from The Collected Stories of Lydia Davis, which he reviewed in the April 29, 2010 issue of The New York Review, and talks to Gabriel Winslow-Yost about accidental greatness, lonely translators, and reading at stoplights.

  • The heat and the light of a dusty galaxy | Bad Astronomy

    The European Southern Observatory just released a new image of the spiral galaxy M83, and it’s a pretty cool shot:

    eso_m83

    [Click to embiggen, or

    No, this dust is actually composed of complex organic molecules, and they are opaque to visible light. A cloud of dust a few light years across might as well be a concrete wall if you’re trying to look past it with a telescope. Whatever’s behind it is hidden.

    But infrared light has a longer wavelength than visible light, and it passes through that dust. So an image of a galaxy in IR can look a lot different than one taken in visible light. When I first saw the picture above, I didn’t even recognize the galaxy! Mind you, I am a vastly huge astronomy dork, and can recognize dozens of galaxies at a glance (that would sound like bragging if the topic were any different). So to be stumped, even for a moment, when seeing such a picture is disturbing. Here’s a side-by-side shot to show you the difference:

    eso_m83_ir_vis

    [Again, click to enspiralate, and to get much huger pix.]

    See why I was confused? They look pretty different, and not just due to the colors. In the visible light image on the right, the spiral arms are lit up by really hot stars (some many times hotter than the Sun), and the glowy pink and red parts are clouds of gas where stars are being born. The hydrogen in the clouds gets heated up (astronomers call that being “excited”, a gentle reminder that we’re dorks) and emits a lot of light, making them very showy and obvious. Those regions are punctuated by long streamers of darkness, the dust clouds scattered along the arms. They are essentially gone from the IR image on the left! The star forming regions are hard to see as well; they don’t emit nearly as much IR as visible light, so they fade into the background.

    I’ll note that just because these images are in the infrared doesn’t mean they’re tracking heat; at least, not like what you normally think of when you think “infrared”. A lot of folks equate IR with heat, but that’s not really the case. When you see images from a thermal camera (like in those awful ghost hunting shows) those are way way farther out than what your eye sees, like at 10 – 20 microns. Objects at human body temperature glow at those wavelengths. The picture of M83 was at 2.2 microns, which is where objects at about 1000°C (1800° F) glow. So in a sense we’re still seeing heat, but from objects much hotter than even an oven set to broil — this IR light is from red stars, like giants and supergiants near the ends of their lives.

    Looking in the IR tells us a lot about galaxies, more than we’d know otherwise just looking in the visible part of the spectrum. And while the image from the VLT is pretty cool, I have to admit I like the one in visible light better aesthetically. It’s prettier. And it just goes to show you: we need our dark side. It provides contrast against which to see our warmer side.

    Image credits: ESO/M. Gieles. Acknowledgment: Mischa Schirmer


  • iPhone OS 4.0 SDK beta 4 released

    iPhone OS 4.0 beta sdk 4

    For all you iPhone and devs out there, you can now head on over to the iPhone Developer Portal to grab iPhone OS 4 beta 4, which Apple just released, alongside beta 4 of the SDK. The software build is 8A274b, while the SDK build is 10M2252. Apple is right on time, continuing to deliver iPhone OS 4.0 betas about two weeks apart from each other, every other Tuesday. It should drop down to weekly releases sometime soon here, what with the rumored to make its debut sometime next month.


    Tags:
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,
    ,

    iPhone OS 4.0 SDK beta 4 released originally appeared on Gear Live on Wed, May 19, 2010 – 9:23:15


  • Governor Vetoes Bill That Would Tax TARP Bonuses

    Senate Bill No. 1 was vetoed by Gov. M. Jodi Rell today.

    The bill, which was pushed heavily by Senate President Pro Tem Donald Williams Jr., D-Brooklyn, would have taxed bonuses received by workers at banks that got federal bailout money under TARP, the Troubled Asset Relief Program. The 8.97 percent temporary tax would have applied to those who received more than $1 million.

    The bill would have also suspended the business entity tax for two years for businesses with at least one employee and a net income of under $50,000.

    Democrats said revenue from the tax on TARP bonuses would have made up for money lost by suspending the business entity tax. Suspending the entity tax would have helped 46,000 Connecticut businesses, they said.   

    The legislature’s non-partisan Office of Fiscal Analysis has said that taxing TARP bonuses would bring in only $2.7 million to $4.8 million, altogether, in fiscal years 2010-2011 and 2011-2012. It estimates that fewer than 100 employees in Connecticut will receive qualifying bonuses over the next two years.

    Rell said in a prepared statement Tuesday that she agrees that the TARP bonuses are inappropriate, but said that the bill would have triggered an automatic deficit and a long, costly and potentially unwinnable legal battle.

    “However well-intentioned, I cannot sign into law a bill that creates an instant budget deficit,” Rell said. “And while–like many people–I am outraged that any business that took a federal bailout would be paying out big bonuses to its executives, the law does not permit us to target individuals with punitive taxes. Many legal experts have warned that this legislation would certainly be challenged as exactly that.”

    Williams said Tuesday he was disappointed that Rell vetoed Senate Bill No. 1.

    “Small businesses account for the vast majority of new jobs in Connecticut and this initiative would have offered help where it is needed most,” he said. “Our plan to compensate for the tax cut by implementing a temporary surcharge on large Wall Street bank bonuses was fair and legally sound. Unfortunately Republicans have been determined to protect these Wall Street bonuses–their legal argument is simply a smokescreen.” 

  • MIT “Double Bubble” Plane Uses 70% Less Fuel

    Air travel is often hailed as the safest form of travel, and there is something to be said for getting where you need to go in a hurry. Of course, to cruise six miles or more above the Earth going hundreds of miles per hour requires high octane jet fuel. Lots and lots of it. A Boeing 747-8 can carry up to 64,000 gallons of jet fuel and, depending on how fast it flies, can burn through over three-thousand gallons of fuel per hour.

    No matter what you say about efficiency-per-passenger, that is a whole lotta jet fuel. Everybody knows it, including NASA, which enlisted six research teams to design a more efficient aircraft. A team led by researchers at MIT came up with a plane they call the “double bubble” that is supposed to reduce fuel consumption by 70%.

    (more…)

  • Besha Rodell on anonymity and restaurant criticism

    Creative Loafing’s food editor and restaurant critic Besha Rodell has a thoughtful story about the role of anonymity in restaurant criticism in this week’s issue. This has been an active topic in the food world since the New York Times appointed its former food editor, the easily recognizable Sam Sifton, as reviewer. Be sure to check it out. And if you’re a restaurateur eager to find out what Besha looks like, here’s your opportunity. She speaks with vocal timbre of Lurch from the “Addams Family” and dresses like the Black Smoke from “Lost.” If you see this coming into restaurant, sear those scallops to perfection!

  • Big Oil’s friends on Capitol Hill block spill liability increase

    by Randy Rieland

    These are tough times for buddies of Big Oil on Capitol
    Hill. How do you stand by your men amid photos
    of thick pools of oil lapping into the marshes of southern Louisiana
    and more video of BP pipes
    gushing oil
    ?

    But love, as always, finds a way. 

    In the Senate, fossil-fuel fans James Inhofe (R-Okla.) and
    Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska) have managed
    to grab hold of an issue that shows oil execs that they’ve still got their
    backs: liability.

    Senate Democrats Robert Menendez and Frank Lautenberg of New
    Jersey and Bill Nelson of Florida are pushing a proposal to raise the liability
    cap on oil spills from its current paltry level of $75 million to a more
    realistic $10 billion. Last week, Murkowski
    blocked it
    . Yesterday, Inhofe did.

    And he trotted out the same contorted logic Murkowski’s been
    using: If you set the cap too high, you
    risk putting smaller independent oil companies out of business.  Then only BP, ExxonMobil, and other oil
    giants will be left, he argued.  In
    short, he and Murkowski say they’re looking out for the little guys, all things
    being relative.

    Then things really got strange.  While testifying before the Senate’s Energy
    and Natural Resources Committee, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar started
    channeling Inhofe and Murkowski
    , saying that Congress should avoid setting
    an “arbitrary” cap, and that, yes, we don’t want to hurt smaller oil companies.

    Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.), another Big Oil booster,
    commended Salazar for “taking your time” on setting a cap.

    All that, of course, didn’t play very well with a lot of
    Democrats, starting with Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.), who
    earlier in the day had said
    the cap should be eliminated altogether
    so companies responsible for spills
    would face unlimited liability.  And then
    there was Nelson, who had already blasted away at a Republican idea that the
    cap should somehow be tied to a company’s profits.  Here’s what he said:

    For the life of me, I can’t understand someone objecting, as they are going to do, in raising an artificial limit of $75 million, up to at least $10 billion, and it’s probably going to exceed $10 billion. But the argument you’re going to hear is they are going to say, “Oh, it shouldn’t be this, it ought to be tied to profit.” Now, is it really responsible public policy to say that because of a company makes less money that it should be responsible for less damage? No.

    By late in the day, the White House was trying to run damage control and
    back away from Salazar’s ambiguous comments. 
    It issued
    a statement from Obama
    that condemned Republicans for playing “special
    interest politics” and blocking efforts to raise the liability cap.

    The world, or at least the Capitol Hill slice of it, was back in balance.

    See more play-by-play from yesterday’s hearings in The
    New York Times’ Green blog
    .

    Why didn’t we think of that?

    Rep. Sam Graves (R-Mo.) has his own special take on the oil spill.  It never would have happened, he says, if we
    had only gone ahead and drilled,
    baby, drilled in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
    in Alaska. 

    Timing is everything

    This week, the BP Sea Otter Habitat exhibit opens at the Aquarium of the
    Pacific in Long Beach, Calif.  Although
    the oil company donated $1 million for the facility, no BP officials are
    expected to attend.  The
    Los Angeles Times has the story.

    Related Links:

    Obama admin overhauls MMS, the agency in charge of offshore drilling

    Rand Paul’s Copenhagen rant and other election notes

    Robert Redford and green groups tell Obama to step up on Gulf oil leak






  • Donations being collected for HTC HD2 WP7 port attempt

    HTC-HD2-Windows-Phone-7-Series-port

    Da_G from XDA-Developers.com has been hard at work cracked the leaked HTC Mondrian ROM, and has made much progress. He has however gone as far as he can with just the software tools available, and to stand any chance of getting this ROM on the HTC HD2 he needs an HTC HD2 himself, and also a Trace Analyzer to find the JTAG (for a full explanation see this post here.)

    The community being what they are, a donation thread has been started, and already around $600 has been collected.  The equipment however totals a total of $1400, so more support is needed.

    Read the donation thread here, and donate using this paypal account here.


  • Survey Says: 65 Percent of Americans Want Government-Enforced 50 MPG Standards

    The consequences of our almost hopeless relationship with oil are clearly on everybody’s minds these days — and for good reason. The disaster on the Deepwater Horizon and its incomprehensible effects on both the ocean ecosystem and people’s livelihoods, for likely decades to come, has hit the message home that our oil addiction holds us all at its mercy.

    And that’s just no way to live… being at the complete mercy of something else somehow seems un-American, no? Aren’t we the society that sculpts its own destiny? Don’t we ‘boldly go’? If the results from a new survey done by the Consumer Federation of America are accurate, it seems we haven’t lost that mentality.

    (more…)

  • Calderon hits Arizona immigration law at White House arrival. Transcript

    OTE: The translation of President Calderón’s remarks at the Arrival Ceremony were provided by the Embassy of Mexico.

    THE WHITE HOUSE
    Office of the Press Secretary
    ________________________________________________________________________________________________
    For Immediate Release May 19, 2010

    REMARKS BY
    PRESIDENT CALDERÓN OF MEXICO AT ARRIVAL CEREMONY

    South Lawn

    His Excellency Mr. Barack Obama, President of the United States of America
    Mrs. Michelle Obama;
    Ladies and Gentlemen,

    I appreciate the kind invitation of President Barack Obama to carry out this State Visit. Mexico and the United States…. We are friend and partner nations; nations that work together and trade… And that complement each other economically; nations that dialogue and that are intertwined by geography and history.

    As you pointed out Mr. President, while in Mexico, “what makes us good neighbors is a simple truth: our peoples share way beyond our common challenges and interests.” Indeed, we also share common values and principles such as freedom, justice, legality and democracy.

    Today, Mexicans and Americans share a decisive moment for our respective countries. We face common challenges of great magnitude: organized crime, economic crisis, climate change, migration. These monumental challenges place us at a crossroads: either we return to mutual recrimination, which has been so useless and so damaging in previous times, or we face and overcome these challenges together, and from there, we begin a new chapter of shared prosperity.

    This is the choice: look toward the future, and begin a new era in the strategic partnership between the United States and Mexico based upon shared responsibility.

    I am sure that by working with shared responsibility, our governments will be able to open new paths for a more secure, more sustainable, more competitive and more prosperous North America.

    We can do it if together we face and combat transnational organized crime. This is our common enemy and the greatest threat to our peoples.
    We can do it if together we support a new model for economic development, in harmony with the environment.

    We can do it if we know how to make the most of how our two economies complement each other. If we take advantage of our trade and integration to create more and better jobs in both countries. If we can work together to encourage the successful integration of the Mexican-American and Latino communities in this country. We will do it, if we know how to add up our strengths to make North America the most competitive and prosperous region in the world.

    We can make it, if we continue building a safer border and if we transform it in a border that does not divide our peoples, in a land of opportunities and progress. We can make it, if we develop a comprehensive, fair and long term solution to the challenges that migration currently poses. I know that we share the interest in promoting dignified, legal and orderly living conditions to all migrant workers. Many of them, despite their significant contribution to the economy and to the society of the United States, still live in the shadows and, occasionally, as in Arizona, they even face discrimination.

    Divided we cannot overcome these enormous challenges. A prosperous North America that benefits both Americans and Mexicans is only feasible if we work shoulder to shoulder, and if we confront these challenges decisively and courageously.

    Mr. President,

    I come today to seal the pact of friendship that a year ago you offered to Mexico and to the Mexican people. Mexicans and Americans, we are faced with major common problems and challenges, but at the same time, we have the possibility of shared success in the horizon.

    Can we overcome these challenges? Can we build that future of prosperity we want for our people? Yes we can, if we work together.

    Thank You Mr. President for your kind invitation.

    END

  • Anna Nicole Smith Underwear Auction Shutdown By eBay

    Unlike Victoria’s Secret and GAP, eBay does not participate in the resale of used panties. Thank you very much!

    On Wednesday, the world’s leading auction site pulled the plug on an auction promoting the sale of used underwear that allegedly once belonged to late Playboy model Anna Nicole Smith. Several articles of lacy lingerie — including “worn” garters, belts and panties — were put on sale this week by Jackie Hatten, the sister of Smith’s former boyfriend Mark Hatten.

    The sale was later scrapped by eBay, who adheres to strict rules regarding hygiene and used clothing.

    “eBay policy strictly prohibits listing used underwear,” a company spokesperson told TMZ Wednesday. “Used clothing may be listed on eBay as long as it has been cleaned and the listing clearly states that the clothing is used.”


  • Unlocking service gives Pre Plus the chance to live on T-Mobile

    Palm Pre unlocked

    Despite the rumors that circulated around about T-Mobile picking up the Pre Plus and Pixi Plus, AT&T was the first GSM provider out of the gate (in the States, that is).  As a result, T-Mobile users are the only ones left without a webOS option.  Thanks to the nextgenserver SIM unlock method, users can purchase a GSM Pre Plus and have it unlocked for use on the nation’s fourth largest wireless carrier.

    Keep in mind, it’s not cheap – the full retail price of the Pre Plus comes in at $399.99, and the unlocking service will cost another $37.  What’s more, due to the difference between AT&T and T-Mobile’s 3G frequencies, you’re looking at an EDGE-only device.  But hey – webOS goodness is webOS goodness.  Keeping that in mind, anyone considering the ol’ switcharoo?

    Via PreCentral


  • Hurt Locker Producer Says That Criticizing His Plan To Sue Fans Means You’re A Moron And A Thief

    Robert Ring was the first of a bunch of you to send in this gem. You may recall the reports that the producers of the Oscar-winning movie Hurt Locker were supposedly gearing up to sue tens of thousands of fans for unauthorized file trading of the movie. Even if you’re against infringing on copyrights, it’s not hard to see why this is a strategy doomed to backfire massively. A Boing Boing reader found the email for Hurt Locker producer, Nicolas Chartier, who already has something of a reputation for… well… aggressive emailing, and received quite a response.

    First, the polite and email the reader sent to Chartier, expressing why he thinks the legal strategy is a mistake:


    Dear Mr. Chartier,

    I have recently become aware of Voltage Pictures’ intention to sue thousands of people who are suspected of having used BitTorrent to download films produced by your company.

    I wish to register my disagreement with these tactics, and would like you to know that as a result of these actions I am boycotting your films. The majority of the people you are suing were not seeking to make money from their downloads, and will be financially devastated by a lawsuit or settlement. While it is completely understandable that Voltage Pictures wishes to defend its intellectual property, this is an inhumane way of doing so.

    Until Voltage Pictures publicly states that it will not pursue lawsuits for downloading its films, I will not view, rent or buy any films produced wholly or in part by your company. I will urge my friends and family to take the same actions. I do not wish for the money I spend on entertainment to be used against otherwise good people.

    Thank you for your time.

    And now for Chartier’s response:


    Hi Nicholas, please feel free to leave your house open every time you go out and please tell your family to do so, please invite people in the streets to come in and take things from you, not to make money out of it by reselling it but just to use it for themselves and help themselves. If you think it’s normal they take my work for free, I’m sure you will give away all your furniture and possessions and your family will do the same. I can also send you my bank account information since apparently you work for free and your family too so since you have so much money you should give it away… I actually like to pay my employees, my family, my bank for their work and like to get paid for my work. I’m glad you’re a moron who believes stealing is right. I hope your family and your kids end up in jail one day for stealing so maybe they can be taught the difference. Until then, keep being stupid, you’re doing that very well. And please do not download, rent, or pay for my movies, I actually like smart and more important HONEST people to watch my films.

    best regards,

    Nicolas Chartier
    Voltage Pictures, LLC

    Wow. Note that the original letter to Chartier did not, in any way, defend the practice of downloading the film. It just noted that suing everyone did not seem like a proportional response. And, for that, Chartier calls him a moron and a thief and wishes his whole family ends up in jail. I guess when you have someone like that in charge, it’s no wonder that they think filing tens of thousands of lawsuits against fans is a sensible position. Perhaps somewhere along the line someone will sit Chartier down and explain to him the difference between disagreeing with a strategy and promoting infringement. At that time, perhaps they can also explain to him the difference between theft and infringement. Now I can understand why even folks at the MPAA have been rapidly distancing themselves from Chartier and this particular campaign, making it clear to pretty much everyone that they do not support his strategy for dealing with unauthorized sharing of his movie.

    Update: In the meantime, I had almost forgotten that the producers of the movie, including Voltage Pictures, are being sued by a soldier, who claims that the movie was actually “his” story. Now, as we wrote when that story came out, the claim seems ridiculous, but if you run his claim through the same argument that Chartier makes above, it makes you wonder if by Chartier’s own bizarre logic, he really should pay that soldier. After all, he took that soldier’s “story” for free, and that soldier likes to get paid for his work too, I’m sure.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story





  • John Travolta to be a Father Again

    56 year old actor John Travolta confirmed that he and his wife Kelly Preston are expecting a new baby to their family. John said it is impossible to keep this secret, and he is very happy, he said he wanted to be the first to share this wonderful news with his fans. When he announced this news, he looked very proud and very energetic as well.



    47 year old Travolta’s wife Kelly Preston is pregnant with her 3rd child and she is in 3rd month already. This is a great news for Travolta family 17 months after the death of their elder son Jett. 16 year old Jett died in 2009 January. Another tragedy with Travolta was the death of their two dogs which were run over by a service vehicle.

    John and his family stayed out of public eyes after the tragedy for almost a year, and John just appeared in front of media and public for his new upcoming movie. The couple has a 10 year old daughter Ella Bleu who also shared this joyous moment with mom and dad. We are really happy for John and Kelly!!

    Related posts:

    1. John Travolta and Kelly Preston expecting a new child
    2. Travolta Couple is having their Newborn for the Third Time!
    3. John Travolta’s dogs were killed