Blog

  • Actual Analysis: HP buys Palm, and the earth does move

    By Carmi Levy, Betanews

    Banner: Analysis

    HP’s just-announced $1.2 billion offer to buy Palm is as close as this industry gets to a lifejacket. Despite the fact that the deal won’t suddenly vault Palm back to the top of the mobile market it practically created, HP’s ultimate goals for its latest acquisition extend well beyond the near-term.

    It’s been clear for years that Palm simply couldn’t make a go of it on its own — that if the company hoped to remain relevant in today’s fast-evolving mobile marketplace, it needed to be acquired. The announcement earlier this spring that Palm was seeking a buyer and speaking with interested parties confirmed that it was only a matter of time before a deal was struck.

    A necessary deal

    In that context, the HP buyout is hardly a surprise, and it represents the best possible outcome for Palm. The two companies complement each other rather nicely. HP gets Palm’s innovative mobile operating system, webOS, a stable of well-regarded mobile handsets, and a treasure trove of patents. Palm gains access to HP’s prodigious marketing muscle and global reach. It’s that global reach that not even Apple can compete with, and could seriously rewrite how and where mobile devices are sold.

    For its part, HP’s efforts in mobile handsets for much of the past decade were largely ineffective. Its iPaq brand, acquired through the purchase of Compaq, was virtually ignored through much of its existence, with sporadic hardware refreshes and a stubborn adherence to the now-dead Microsoft Windows Mobile operating system. HP’s mobile offerings had near-zero consumer impact and no carrier presence. Enterprise adoption was similarly weak before the Palm announcement. With $25 million in sales last quarter, it’s easy to forgive casual observers who assumed HP wasn’t even playing in this market. In many respects, it gave up long ago.

    This deal gives HP another shot at mobile relevance, but it’ll have to invest significant resources to give Palm the push that it needs to remain current and competitive. After years of reinventing itself to the detriment of a well-stocked product pipeline, Palm now finds itself in dire need of a rebuild. As its new owner, HP will be faced with the daunting task of not only bringing new products to market, but also rebuilding shattered developer loyalty and turning webOS into the kind of platform that spawns thousands of apps and an economy all its own.

    Carmi Levy Wide Angle Zoom (v.2)A few years too late

    Palm’s mistake in introducing the Pre and webOS in 2009 was in focusing so heavily on the actual device that it forgot how significantly the market had changed since it introduced its first Treo smartphone. The offerings themselves were — and are — brilliantly engineered examples of next-generation mobility. From a usability standpoint, they even gave the market leading iPhone and Android solutions a run for their money. Had they hit the market three years earlier, they might have been enough to guarantee Palm’s independent survival.

    Unfortunately for Palm, it isn’t 2007. Apple’s iPhone and later, its App Store, rewrote the rule book that all mobile vendors must now follow. Market success is no longer determined by whoever rolls out the coolest devices. Without developer support, even the most deftly advanced piece of hardware will fail miserably. Despite Palm’s efforts to reconnect with developers who had long since defected to competing platforms, the end result was an application store filled with tumbleweed and a roadmap with no direction. With no ecosystem to support the critically acclaimed devices and operating system, Palm’s market share erosion continued to accelerate.

    It’s a process that will likely continue for some time to come. In the absence of an actual plan to kick-start the app side of the house and get developers on board, Palm will remain stuck around the fringes of a mobile market that’s rapidly passing it by. The clock is ticking for HP, and its corporate leadership — spearheaded by Tom Bradley, EVP of the Personal Systems Group — knows it. Bradley was once Palm’s CEO, so it’s likely Palm will get what it needs to market, and quickly — which includes that chance to develop its way out of its current hole.

    But the Titanic couldn’t turn on a dime, and neither can jaded and faded smartphone vendors.

    The good news for Apple and Google is they have nothing to fear. It’ll take the better part of a year to 18 months for HP to integrate what it’s just bought and begin to turn things in a more profitable, growth-focused direction. In the interim, the Apple and Google mobile juggernauts will continue to grow, virtually guaranteeing that Palm will never again be a #1 player, and it won’t directly threaten the industry giants anytime soon.

    A different definition of success

    Even so, dominance isn’t necessarily HP’s near-term goal here. For now, it’s entirely sufficient to build a new foundation and leave the long-term stuff for another day. What matters to Palm is that it now has a new corporate parent willing to give it the resources it needs to become a viable, profitable smaller player in a market that’ll eventually be large enough to support more than two dominant leaders. Apple’s Mac has carved out a respectable and profitable business with only 10% market share, albeit in the computer space; and iPhone has commanded a 16.2% share of the global smartphone space, according to iSuppli estimates published today.

    Palm has about a 1.5% stake in that smartphone realm, and the distance between it and iPhone from one point of view looks like a chasm. But Motorola is at 3.9%, which means Palm doesn’t have far to go to resume being taken seriously. If that happens, Palm could indeed regain viability in the mobile market, but only if HP plays its cards right and invests deeply and quickly enough to turn things around.

    Longer-term, however, HP will be selling Palms in places Apple and Google can only dream about. And with a global manufacturing influence that makes Apple look puny by comparison, HP can play the economies-of-scale game better than anyone. While an HP-owned Palm won’t dominate today’s market, HP’s end game likely envisions a significantly changed environment that renders 2010-based assumptions of mobile market success obsolete.

    Your chances of buying a Palm-branded device sometime this year may not have increased much as a result of this acquisition. But what you’ll be buying years down the line may very well have changed after this week’s announcement. It often takes that long to realize just how fundamentally things have changed following a business-seismic event like this. Don’t bet against HP having the patience and the wherewithal to invest, heavily, in this long-term game. Just because we didn’t feel the ground move doesn’t mean it didn’t.

    Carmi Levy is a Canadian-based independent technology analyst and journalist still trying to live down his past life leading help desks and managing projects for large financial services organizations. He comments extensively in a wide range of media, and works closely with clients to help them leverage technology and social media tools and processes to drive their business.

    Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2010



    Add to digg
    Add to Google
    Add to Slashdot
    Add to Twitter
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to Facebook
    Add to Technorati



  • Hans Pandeya Demands Apology From Us; Says He’s Now Put Pirate Bay Acquisition On Hold

    After publishing our post on Hans Pandeya’s bizarre and ridiculous attempt to buy The Pirate Bay again, after his failed bid last year (while still pretending that bid succeeded), Mr. Pandeya sent us an email demanding that we issue a correction and an apology for our story. Oddly, he failed to point out a single thing we got wrong in the story, so we’re not really sure what to correct and don’t see any reason to issue an apology. He did, however, send us a link to another press release that he, himself, sent out, claiming that his own company has “put the acquisition on hold.” Uh, yeah. Perhaps that’s because there’s no acquisition to be had. It also claims that GGF is “commencing an arbitration proceeding” to gain control over The Pirate Bay’s domain name. That ought to go over well considering GGF never actually paid for The Pirate Bay and that deal collapsed, it’s difficult to see what kind of claim he thinks he has on the domain now. We eagerly await future emails where he explains. Perhaps, next time, he can include more details to back up his claims.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story





  • HP execs: Fate of Palm’s R&D team, iPaq, Pre, and Pixi still undecided

    By Scott M. Fulton, III, Betanews

    If financial analysts had concerns about Hewlett-Packard’s ability to resurrect Palm’s flailing fortunes, those concerns may have actually deepened following HP’s announcement call with analysts Wednesday afternoon.

    During the call, which lasted under 20 minutes, Executive Vice President Todd Bradley told analysts that he expects HP’s track record for building out communications infrastructure with eight of the world’s ten largest telecom carriers will earn HP points when making its case for carrying Palm products.

    “Today, HP provides the infrastructure for eight of the ten top carriers in the world, and as we build our execution plans, we focused on leveraging several large carriers instead of large numbers of small carriers. So we think that leverage and that focus will provide a very significant growth platform for these products as we go forward.”

    Those top 10 carriers, as reported by The Wall Street Journal last month, are: China Mobile, Vodafone Group (UK, co-owner with Verizon of Verizon Wireless in the US), Telefónica SA (Spain), América Móvil (South America), Telenor (Norway), Deutsche Telecom AG, China Unicom, TeliaSonera AB (Sweden), France Télécom SA (a.k.a. Orange), and Bharti Airtel (India).

    HP’s Bradley acknowledged that building out Palm’s developer network for webOS will be a key priority, and VP for Investor Relations Jim Burns confirmed that HP plans to invest in developers above and beyond what Palm has done so far. No numbers yet, but the key direction here is up.

    The Personal Systems Group (PSG) accounted for over one-third of HP’s revenue in fiscal 2009, with $10.6 billion. With quite a bit of costs involved, it eked out $530 million in revenue for that year. Palm issued guidance just this morning, warning investors that its numbers for fiscal Q4 2010 (three months ending in May) could come in below its early estimates. It could reap as little as $90 million in revenue for this quarter, on account of “slow sales of the Company’s products, which has resulted in low order volumes from carriers. Palm also expects to close its fourth fiscal quarter with a cash, cash equivalents, and short-term investments balance between $350 million and $400 million,” as Palm disclosed to the SEC this morning.

    That’s a staggering plummet from $350 million in revenue in the previous quarter, certainly due to more than just “seasonality.” Palm lost $22 million for that quarter. Current R&D costs for Palm were estimated by a JP Morgan analyst at $190 million annually — a figure which HP’s Jim Burns promised would increase. So with HP’s PSG earning upwards of $134 million per quarter, and increased R&D costs to come, one can imagine Palm draining PSG’s entire profit for at least the remainder of this year.

    That’s why it’s so important to determine just who will be responsible for providing that R&D. Among the few questions that analysts were allowed today were a few that probed into the fate of Palm’s current R&D team. The fact that HP execs responded by saying Palm’s executives’ careers were safe, was a bit ominous.

    Speaking on behalf of Palm CEO Jon Rubinstein, HP’s Bradley passed on his excitement. “He’s very excited about staying and building out, actually executing his vision for the webOS into a broader market,” he said, “and I think HP brings those capabilities to him to do that. And I think it’s fair to say his team is excited as well.”

    When pressed by an RDC analyst as to whether HP intends to acquire Palm’s R&D team whole, and then keep it whole or integrate its members into the company, Bradley was forced to concede that his plan appears to be to maintain one and only one R&D team. “We intend to operate [Palm] as a business unit, which is in line with the way we’re structured today,” he responded, before reiterating Rubinstein’s and Palm executives’ desire to stay on.

    “Palm’s operating at a loss right now,” added Burns at one point, “so we got work to do.”

    At one point, Bradley said HP could not go into specifics as to its future roadmap for Palm OS until it completed the deal and received the necessary regulatory approval. Estimates as to when that could take place were all over the map, extending into the beginning of HP’s fiscal 2011 (this December). Only when the final signatures are affixed to the paper will we start to see guidance about such important issues as: the fate of HP’s existing iPaq line (some may recall it actually has one — it consists of Windows Mobile phones at the moment); integration of webOS with existing HP hardware such as its Slate tablet; and just how HP plans to expand Palm’s presence, as Bradley promised at one point, into the commercial space to compete against RIM.

    “I think you have to break it up along [different] product categories. While Palm currently has the Pre and the Pixi smartphones, we see that as one space that is very consumer-oriented, and we’ll look at how we leverage both our retail and commercial channels to broaden the distribution of those sets of products,” HP’s Todd Bradley told Cross Research. “I think the tablet/slate products are such new markets, we see opportunities broadly for consumers. But at the same time, having just finished up our partner conference, enormous interest on behalf of channel partners with specific vertical deployments in things like health care and education. So I think you’ll see these products deployed in both segments, consumer and commercial. Again, we’ll talk about that time line as we get closer to completion.”

    Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2010



    Add to digg
    Add to Google
    Add to Slashdot
    Add to Twitter
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to Facebook
    Add to Technorati



  • Specter – A Year after the Storm

    WASHINGTON — Thursday marks one year since Pennsylvania Senator Arlen Specter announced he was becoming a Democrat, leaving the Republican Party and a potentially tough 2010 Pennsylvania GOP primary election in his rearview mirror. One year after his decision, Specter finds himself under fire from both sides; a Democratic primary challenge from his left by Rep. Joe Sestak, D –Pa., as well as incessant attacks from the GOP.

    In remarks to be delivered Thursday evening in Washington, Sestak will hit on his opponent’s change of heart last year, “A year ago today, Senator Specter, after 44 years as a Republican, left his party. He made his reasons very clear. He said he joined our party because his chances of winning re-election as a Republican were “bleak.”

    The Pennsylvania congressman is also accusing Specter of spreading mistruths in their recent TV ad, which claims Sestak was “relieved of duty in the navy for creating a poor command climate”. “I retired because my daughter had a brain tumor…” Sestak told Fox News today, “this is what’s wrong with politics.”

     Meanwhile, conservative Republican Pat Toomey waits to see which Democrat he’ll be running against in the fall, but that hasn’t stopped his campaign from chiming in, especially on this occasion. “Over the past year, Arlen Specter has proven time and again that the only principle that matters to him is the preservation of his own political career,” Toomey Communications Director Nachama Soloveichik said. “He has changed his position on nearly every issue, from health care, to card check, to national security.”

    Specter’s campaign fired right back at the Toomey campaign’s criticism, “Pat Toomey is the original Mr. No of Pennsylvania politics and far outside the mainstream here, ” said Specter Campaign Manager Christopher Nicholas.

    On the Senate floor Thursday, Specter attempted to stay above the fray, “The stakes for America require that we all do our level best and permit the public to judge us accordingly… there is a pressing need for Republicans to join with us in reforming Wall Street, to prevent the kind of financial crisis which cost this country eight million jobs.”

    However, Specter staffers however found themselves doing a bit of cleanup Thursday, with multiple news outlets filing on the following Specter quote: ”Well, I probably shouldn’t say this,”[Specter] said over lunch last month. ”But I have thought from time to time that I might have helped the country more if I’d stayed a Republican.”

    Mr. Nicholas responded by emailing out what he characterized as the entire quote, for context:

    “Well, I probably shouldn’t say this, but I have thought from time to time that I might have helped the country more if I’d stayed Republican and tried to bring people across the aisle on healthcare. I might have brought a few across the aisle.”

  • NCBI ROFL: Finally, science brings you…the baby poop predictor (with alarm)! | Discoblog

    Detection of predefecatory rectosigmoid wave activity for prevention of fecal soiling in infants. “Identification of an electrophysiologic sign before defecation can prevent fecal soiling in infants. To identify such a sign, the contractile activity of sigmoid colon was recorded percutaneously in 48 healthy infants. The recorder was equipped with a digital clock synchronized to the recorder so as to set off an alarm upon significantly increased electromyographic activity of sigmoid colon. Examination of the recordings at high speed revealed three types of basal, signaling and predefecatory waves of activities. The ‘basal’ component was comprised of as negatively deflected slow waves. The signaling waves exhibited an increase in amplitudes, cycle rate and conduction velocity, were repeated 8.2+/-1.2 times and lasted for 14.6+/-2.1 minutes prior to defecation, The ‘predefecatory’ waves preceded defecation by 40.3+/-7.3 seconds, showed a significant increase in wave parameters and sounded the alarm. The findings show a method for early detection of defecation that can be used clinically to prevent fecal soiling in infants.” Image: flickr/keeping_it_real Related content:
    Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Science: getting babies drunk since 1997
    Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: Salmonella excretion in joy-riding pigs.
    Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: The collapse of toilets in Glasgow.
    Discoblog: NCBI ROFL: “Back and forth forever” (or, DIY poop therapy). WTF is …


  • Mitsubishi giving Peugeot/Citroën version of ASX

    Filed under: , , , , , , ,

    Mitsubishi ASX – Click above for high-res image gallery

    Mitsubishi, Citroen and Peugeot have announced a partnership that should have a new small SUV in French show rooms by early 2012. The Japanese automaker has agreed to share its ASX platform with PSA Peugeot Citroen in an effort to move more models for everyone involved. Mitsubishi says that while it is providing the bare bones for the project, respective models from the two European automakers will incorporate unique bodywork as well as their own engine.

    While the French-Japanese creation will use a 1.6-liter diesel four-cylinder culled from the PSA Citroen Peugeot parts bin, buyers will be able to choose between front-wheel and four-wheel drive models.

    The partnership should move an additional 50,000 platforms out of Mitsubishi’s doors and onto the streets of Europe. PSA Peugeot Citroen believes the small SUV segment will explode in the near future, with sales leaping by as much as 60 percent by 2015. Hit the jump to see the full press release.

    Gallery: Mitsubishi ASX

    [Source: Mitsubishi]

    Continue reading Mitsubishi giving Peugeot/Citroën version of ASX

    Mitsubishi giving Peugeot/Citroën version of ASX originally appeared on Autoblog on Wed, 28 Apr 2010 18:00:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments

  • Iranian Plane Checks out USS Eisenhower

    Multiple U.S. military sources tell Fox News early morning on Wednesday, April 21st, an Iranian Navy F-27 maritime patrol aircraft, flying in international airspace, flew near the USS Eisenhower (CVN 69) shortly after the aircraft carrier had finished being resupplied in the Gulf of Oman.

    Sources tell Fox this is the type of plane: 

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fokker_Friendship

    Senior U.S. military sources say the plane’s closest point of approach was 1000 yards (more than ½ mile or 10 football fields) from the USS Eisenhower. 

    Military sources say this aircraft was a unarmed multi-engine propeller plane, configured only for maritime patrol. To be precise, sources tell Fox it had no weapon systems.

    Navy personnel identified the aircraft as part of Iran’s regular Navy (professional Navy) not the Quds Force.

    The plane remained in the area for approximately 20 minutes before leaving the vicinity.  Military sources say interaction with the aircraft were routine and consistent with the type of behavior we see daily with their professional Navy.

    U.S. aircraft carriers have not operated regularly inside the Arabian Gulf in the past couple of years due to being dedicated to Operation Enduring Freedom (OEF) support the War in Afghanistan. The carrier position for OEF support is usually far enough east that Iranian maritime patrol flights do not usually venture out there, which is why they do not normally interact with American carriers.

    U.S. Navy ships operating inside the Arabian Gulf, on the other hand, routinely have Iranian maritime patrol aircraft fly by their positions – almost on a daily basis.

    U.S. officials say Iranian forces are aware of the American military presence in the region just as American ships are aware of their positioning.  

    Military sources say the interaction of U.S. forces with the regular Iranian Navy and Air Force continues to be within standards of maritime practice.

  • Open vs. Closed: Why Open Standards Matter

    Browser vendor Opera Software is well-known for its support of open web standards. So hot on the heels of the release of Opera 10.52 for Mac, I thought I’d chat to Bruce Lawson, a web evangelist at Opera, about the Open vs. Closed debate, which we’re covering as an ongoing series on the GigaOM Network, to get his take on why open standards matter for web workers — and the web as a whole. Below is a lightly edited version of our conversation.

    Simon: Can you briefly outline Opera’s stance on open standards?

    Lawson: Of all the browsers currently available, Opera has been around the longest, and has always supported open standards. Note I don’t mean open source; although there are overlaps between the two movements, they’re not the same. You could make an open-source Photoshop clone, for example, but as the Photoshop data format PSD isn’t an open standard, so you couldn’t use it in your clone. We believe that if data is transferred in open, royalty-free formats then it is more future-proof and more manipulable than data that is held in proprietary formats. You’re also protected against being locked into one company’s products — if you don’t like us tomorrow, you can change. I have university essays in a proprietary Tasword format that I can’t open any more as the format was tied to one program, which is now discontinued.

    And we put our money where our mouth is: Out of 600 employees, about 25 devote most of their time working on actually making the standards — both the “sexy” standards like HTML5, CSS (our CTO Håkon Wium Lie was co-creator of CSS), SVG, geolocation and widgets, and also the “industry standards” that drive the TV and mobile applications industry, such as CE-HTML, JIL and BONDI.

    Simon: The web designers and developers in the WebWorkerDaily audience should all be aware of the benefits of open standards as they use them daily in their work, but why are they important for everyone else? If I’m, say, a copywriter or a lawyer, why should I care?

    Lawson: Apart from the future-proofing aspect I explained before, you also have the advantage of portability. An HTML document, for example, will open just about anywhere — PC, Mac, Linux, mobile devices, netbooks etc. Documents authored to W3C standards can work with all the world’s languages, and can be run on mobile devices, TVs and even the much-vaunted web-enabled fridge. There’s also the question of accessibility. Open web standards developed by the W3C have to go through a process to ensure they are accessible — that is, the information contained in documents developed according to the standard can be made available to people with disabilities so, for example, a blind person can hear a description of an image, or a person who can’t use a mouse can navigate a web page using only the keyboard. That accessibility isn’t automatic — the developer has to be professional and take care to use the language correctly — but there is nothing inherently blocking that accessibility. It seems to me that a copywriter would want her purple prose to be available to as many people as possible, and the lawyer would know that in many jurisdictions it’s illegal to discriminate against people with disabilities.

    Simon: Opera has been championing support for standards for some time now. Was the decision to support open standards primarily an ideological one, or a commercial one?

    Lawson: Both. Our customers (for our embedded browsers, our mobile browsers, etc.) require us to adhere to industry standards, so if we don’t then we don’t get the business. Open standards, as I explained before, ensure the widest possible reach, so it’s sensible to champion them and support them.

    Fundamentally (and here’s the ideology) we believe that you should be able to reach any website from any device: a desktop, a phone, an in-car browser, a digital picture frame. It won’t necessarily look exactly the same everywhere (in fact, it shouldn’t — a web page might be easier to read if reformatted to fit a mobile phone screen, for example), but you should be able to access it and interact with it.

    Simon: It seems to me that open standards take a long time to develop, due to the amount of wrangling it takes to get agreement from all interested parties in reaching the most acceptable solution. Do you think that open standards hinder or slow the pace of browser innovation (and the web, generally)?

    Lawson: It does take a long time to develop open standards. But that standardization process pays off very quickly. Developing a typical web page now is much quicker if you do it to those standards than it was during the dark days of the last Browser War, when you had to develop parallel code bases for IE and Netscape, or choose one of them and lock out people who used the other browser.

    As to whether open standards slow the development of the browser — that could be true, if we were selfish. If, for example, you wanted to include some new feature in a browser it is indeed much faster just to develop it and add it in, rather than wait for it to be standardized. But that definitely inhibits the development of the open, interoperable web, and for us that’s much, much more important.

    In fact, open standards can speed up browser development. Take, for example, XMLHttpRequest — XHR — the technology that powers Ajax-driven websites that feel as responsive as desktop apps. It was invented by Microsoft. Every other browser vendor saw the value of this technology and spent countless man-hours reverse engineering it to get into their browsers. Now, XHR has been standardized. Any new browser vendor wishing to implement XHR just picks up the spec and implements it, with no need for all that reverse engineering. And because the specification is well-written (disclosure: it was edited by Anne van Kesteren, a colleague of mine at Opera) it can be implemented in a way that is interoperable with existing browsers and websites. Everybody wins.

    Simon: There’s new browser war raging at the moment — the major vendors all have pretty good products. Competition in the market is fierce, and seems to be being waged on three fronts: features, speed and standards. What future developments are you looking forward to the most?

    Lawson: Personally, I’m excited about HTML5 (so excited, in fact, I’m writing a book about it). HTML is the language that the web
    is based on, and it hasn’t been overhauled in a decade. The new version — which already has great support in modern browsers — allows websites to
    be even more like desktop applications, encompassing on-the-fly image generation, native video and audio, data storage in the browser and offline applications. Consumers might not know there’s a whole new evolution under the hood, but they will notice new robustness, interoperability and things “just working” — no more messages to download and install new plugins.

    Widgets are very exciting, too. You can write an app that behaves like a native app, has access to the file system but is written using web standards, so
    can be run on any smartphone with a widget manager (see more at widgets.opera.com)

    What browser developments are you looking forward to the most?

    Related GigaOM Pro content (sub. req.): What Does the Future Hold For Browsers?

    Photo by stock.xchng user beuford00

  • Magic or Science? At an L.A. Festival, It’s Hard to Tell the Difference | Discoblog

    It’s Science vs. Magic week at L.A.’s Magic Castle, where comic magician Rudy Coby and his friends have taken over the Victorian mansion-styled club, and where waitresses are sporting lab coats and serving drinks in test tubes. Coby is reprising his mad scientist alter-ego Labman after a 15-year hiatus–during which time he crafted stage shows for one-time roommate goth rocker Marilyn Manson, who threatens a surprise cameo as “The Evil Magician” at one of Coby’s performances. The event is an ode to magic’s time-honored and gleeful distortion of scientific and technological principals. Coby’s Hypnotron 2000 makes it look like your skin moves after staring at a spinning wheel. Andrew Mayne–who creates illusions for David Blaine and produced the G4 Network’s quirky G4 Underground–unveils a don’t-try-this-at-home effect that has him drinking –320o Fahrenheit liquid nitrogen. College favorite Brian Brushwood has audience members use cell phones to capture a ghostly image on TV static patterns that their eyes miss (pictured). For the kids this weekend, mad scientist Prof. Wes Weasely wields audio magic with his theremin. More surprise guests are planned Thursday through Sunday. — by Sue Karlin Related Content:
    Discoblog: Crazy Optical Illusion of the Day
    Discoblog: To Levitate Water, Turn on the Strobe Lights
    Discoblog: Prepare to Be Amazed… …


  • A Five-Year Medicare ‘Doc Fix’?

    So hinted Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.), who told a crowd gathered this week for an annual meeting of the American Hospital Association that the House might soon introduce such a bill, CQ HealthBeat reports.

    The political advantage of that move is clear: The American Medical Association has been screaming from the rafters for Congress to step in and scrap the flawed formula that dictates Medicare payments to doctors — a formula that would have cut those payments by 21 percent this year without congressional intervention — only to see lawmakers continually apply short-term fixes instead.

    The latest Band-Aid came earlier this month, when Congress delayed the scheduled pay cut until June. That’s better than actually having the cut realized, but it hasn’t satisfied AMA leaders, who endorsed the Democrats’ health care reform bill with the understanding that Congress would solve the Medicare payment problem once and for all.

    “If the formula is not repealed, the problem will continue to grow,” AMA President J. James Rohack said in a statement earlier this month.

    No word yet on how the Democrats would pay for the five-year fix, or even whether it would satisfy a doctors lobby that wants a permanent solution. But Van Hollen, who heads the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, clearly doesn’t want to step into November’s mid-term elections without at least the hint of something more long-term than another Band-Aid.

  • ShapeWriter: Contender for fastest soft-keyboard

    A lot of attention has been paid to Swype, a soft-keyboard app currently in an invite-only closed beta. Many have applied, but few have been approved. If you don’t want to wait to try out this new class of finger-dragging keyboard, there’s an equally impressive free app in the Market called ShapeWriter that works much the same way.

    ShapeWriter works by dragging your finger between letters to build words, then lifting your finger off the screen to create a space between words. It uses an algorithm to figure out the most likely word and also displays a few other choices just in case.

    For new words not in the dictionary, you can tap the keys just like a standard on-screen keyboard. With one additional tap, it saves the word so it will be recognized when you draw its shape again.

    My primary complaint with the stock Android soft-keyboard is having to switch to a new screen for symbols. ShapeWriter solves this by displaying symbols on the keys. To type the symbol instead of the word, just hold the key for a moment and it will change to the symbol.

    ShapeWriter also includes a “command stroke” feature that lets you copy, paste, access keyboard settings and more. Just start your press on the command button (the squiggly one next to the space bar) and spell a word to execute the command. A list of commands can be obtained by tapping the command button.

    Good:

    • Fastest on-screen keyboard I’ve tested
    • Free
    • Easy to add new words to the dictionary

    Bad:

    • If your phone is low on resources, the keyboard can lag and unintentionally break a shape into two words
    • No voice input
    • Does not support themes

    Summary:
    This new class of on-screen keyboard seems to be the most efficient way to input text when a physical keyboard just isn’t an option. With the onslaught of keyboard-less Android tablets predicted for later this year, ShapeWriter’s speed improvements over the default soft-keyboard are a welcome addition to the Android experience.

    Note: This review was submitted by Lane Montgomery as part of our app review contest.




    Related Posts

  • Quaids Cop A Plea; “RuPaul’s Drag Race” Finale Nets Record Ratings For LOGO; Bobby Brown’s Not Dead & More Evening Crunch Crumbs

    -Is Christina Aguilera shooting a music video or auditioning for Cinemax After Dark?

    -Charges have been dropped against Randy Quaid in a long legal battle over a $10,000 unpaid hotel bill, but his wife Evi is on probation after pleading No Contest to a Misdemeanor charge of defrauding an innkeeper…

    -Yep, Bobby Brown’s still alive and kickin’.

    -The ladies of Louis Vuitton au naturale

    COED Magazine rounds up South Park’s most controversial clips ever….

    Tiki Barber’s pregnant wife has filed for divorce just weeks after the former NFL star left her for a 23-year-old former NBC intern. As if his conduct hasn’t been humiliating enough, we hear Tiki’s trying to low-ball Ginny on a financial settlement. How rude!

    -Perhaps someone should have told Olivia Munn that we don’t wear leather to PETA-sponsored events….especially when we’re the guest of honor!

    -Sandra Bullock was “stunned” to learn that she was married to a closeted neo-Nazi….

    -Is Usher engaged to wed his newest cougar?

    -A ten-day summer camp program created by Britney Spears in 1999 is in danger of closing it’s doors due to financial restraints….

    In her upcoming memoir, former First Lady Laura Bush opens up about her 1963 car crash, in which another teen driver was killed….

    -The second season finale of RuPaul’s Drag Race helped LOGO reach an all-time ratings high this week. Monday night’s season wrap up took home the crown as the network’s most watched telecast ever, drawing in 633,000 total viewers, who watched as Ms. Tyra Sanchez was named “America’s Next Drag Superstar….”

    -We didn’t know Complex had a “porn star ethcist….”

    -Move over, Marge Simpson! There’s a new updo in town. Stylista Jennifer Lopez keeps fans buzzing with beehive at London premiere of The Back-Up Plan!

    -It’s Jersey Shore with geriatrics! WeTV’ Sunset Daze….

    -Former American Idol Jordin Sparks is teaming up with the Department of Transportion and congressional leaders for The Ex To The Text Campaign, which aims to get stop people from texting behind the wheel, one of the most dangerous driving distractions and the number one cause of car crashes involving teenagers…


  • Irony Alert: 3Com and Palm will both be under the HP umbrella

    HP Exec Tom Bradley’s history with Palm isn’t the only small-world-of-silicon-valley story today.

    Those familiar with the intricacies of Palm’s corporate history might remember one of the previous dark times (there have been several): back in 1997, Palm was part of US Robotics which was then purchased by 3Com. Things went so poorly with 3Com that the core team behind PalmOS, including Jeff Hawkins, Ed Colligan, and Donna Dubinsky left to found PalmOS licensee Handspring – the original creators of the Palm Treo. Handspring came back to Palm in 2003 to form PalmOne, they spun off PalmSource to handle the software. Keeping hardware separate from software brought about the foibles that killed off PalmOS and necessitated the creation of webOS in the first place.

    HP, who hopes to finish their acquisition of Palm by July 31st, just finished their acquisition of 3Com. HP is taking Cisco on with 3Com and the two divisions probably won’t have much effect on each other – but still, the company picnics should be schadenfreude-riffic.

  • HP: A Transformational Deal for the Mobile Market

    New HP Logo
    HP held an conference call with investors and analysts on the Palm acquisition. In the call Todd Bradley, executive vice president, Personal Systems Group, HP laid out the motivations behind the transaction. Mr. Bradley remarked that it represents a “transformational deal for the connected mobile device market” and he gave a few details and hints about HP’s plans for the future of webOS.

    Mr. Bradley made a point to highlight that webOS lends itself to additional mobile form factors and he stressed the benefits of owning the entire mobile experience. He said that HP sees opportunities in other mobile form factors and market segments for the platform. In specific, larger slate style devices were mentioned a number of times as well as “potential netbooks.” He remarked that HP had gone through the due diligence to confirm that webOS would be able to support such future products. When pressed in the Q&A he declined to give any sort of timeframe or potential product roadmap.






  • Podesta: Energy First for Congress, Then Immigration

    The great debate over the scheduling of comprehensive immigration reform versus clean energy and climate legislation has engulfed Washington. Lost in that frenzy is the need for Congress to do both.  John D. Podesta, CAPAF President and CEO explains why in this repost.

    The Senate now has a clear schedule for consideration: the energy and climate bill followed by immigration reform. The consternation and anxiety—and even the threats—surrounding the schedule must now come to an end so we can solve these critical problems.

    It is obvious that energy and climate legislation is further along in the legislative process than immigration reform. The Environmental Protection Agency is doing its assessment of the bill and it should be ready for Senate consideration within weeks. This gives leadership, sponsors, and supporters time to secure 60 votes.

    Comprehensive immigration reform is no less worthy of consideration but needs more time to develop legislatively. The passage of draconian legislation in Arizona amplifies the demand for a prompt federal solution. Constructing immigration reform that can garner bipartisan support can’t be done in a matter of days but it’s critical that the process be accelerated and we move to it this year.

    Given this path forward it is time for senators and interest groups alike to put an end to the histrionics and get to work.

    – John Podesta


  • How do you argue against the growth juggernaut?

    by Lisa Hymas

    I’ll be talking tomorrow to filmmaker Dave Gardner, who’s making a documentary called Hooked on Growth: Our Misguided Quest for Prosperity.  He wants to hear about my choice to be a GINK—green inclinations, no kids.  And I’ll be offering thoughts about growth in general.  Any suggestions about points to make or ideas to share?  How can we best fight the assumption that what society needs is growth, growth, and more growth?  As Edward Abbey so memorably put it, “Growth for the sake of growth is the ideology of the cancer cell.”

    Here’s a trailer for the film, with commentary from Bill McKibben, Paul Ehrlich, and Dick Lamm, among others. 

    Related Links:

    14 buildings compete to be the Biggest Loser (of energy waste)

    Sit, stay, recycle [VIDEO]

    Ask Umbra on fertility awareness, grilling, and Earth Day pledges






  • Protect Your Kids from Porny Folder Art [Ads]

    This ad for Latinworks’ Parental Control Bar urges parents to protect their kids from the seedier sides of the internet. But if you’re going to organize your folders like that, what the hell do you expect? [ScaryIdeas via Copyranter] More »







  • GTMO Video: Daphne Eviatar Discusses Day 1 of Khadr Hearing

    GUANTANAMO BAY — Seated near me in the courtroom today during Omar Khadr’s pre-trial hearing was a sight for sun-beaten eyes: Daphne Eviatar, the former TWI legal affairs correspondent who’s now working for Human Rights First. Shortly after Army Col. Pat Parrish, the judge hearing the case, gaveled this afternoon’s proceedings into recess, I caught up with Daphne so she could walk everyone through the highlights of the defense’s attempt to suppress Khadr’s statements to interrogators from being used against him in his scheduled July military commission.

    Video after the jump:

  • Nike NBA Post Season Twitter Playoff Treemap

    nike_twitter_basketball.jpg
    The Nike Post Season Twitter Playoff [nikebasketball.com] reveals the relative popularity of NBA teams within the Twitosphere in real-time. The interface is the newest creation of Stamen Design, who have created several other real-time Twitter visualizations for several fancy clients, including MTV (Video Music Awards), the NBC (Winter Olympics) and Twitter themselves.

    In the Matchup interface, the rectangles captured in the treemap-like interface represent a different NBA team each, and dynamically scale according to the number of tweets per minute for that particular team. The Bracket interface orders all the teams in a visual ranking that mimics a play-off style competition. The teams with the most tweets can win “matchups” while miving to subsequent rounds.

  • Student Turing Point Society Inducts New Members

    stps.jpg

    Student Turning Point Society

    The Student Turning Point Society, a select group of undergraduate leaders committed to promoting the spirit of Case Western Reserve University, welcomed more than 20 new members during the 2009-2010 academic year.

    As several members plan to graduate next month, the spirit and enthusiasm demonstrated by the newly-elected members, along with returning ones, are indications that the progress made by the organization will continue.

    “We had an outstanding year and it’s reflected by the large class we’re inducting this year,” said Liz Smith, executive director. “I’m confident in the hands we’re leaving the organization in,” she said of the new and returning members.

    Twenty-two members were introduced at an induction program held this month.

    Named after the campus sculpture of the same name, members of the Student Turning Point Society promote the university’s mission by developing and maintaining relationships with the university’s administration, alumni and friends. Members participate in social functions and alumni events, serve on committees, conduct personal tours for VIPs and other high-profile campus visitors and more. They also work to enhance campus life for future students. They were involved with several events per month during the 2009-2010 academic year.

    Student Turning Point Society members work closely with the university’s alumni relations, development and donor relations offices. “These are some of the most recognizable student leaders on campus. Their ability to connect with external constituents provides a lot of value,” said Michael Wolford, assistant director of donor relations and events and the group’s adviser.

    David Holcomb, a second-year student majoring in economics, is one of the new members. He wanted to join the group “to get involved with an organization focused on directly giving back to the school.”

    Lea Cross, a third-year chemical engineering major, also is a newly-elected member. “The administration has a lot of information to share with students and I feel like we have a lot to share as far as the student experience,” she said about wanting to join the organization.

    In addition to Holcomb and Cross, who were part of the spring 2010 class, the following students were inducted:

    Fall Class of 2009:
    • Brendan Goodwine
    • Colin Downey
    • Brian Nelson
    • Meredith Collier
    • Emily Friedlander
    • Tristan Chen
    Spring Class of 2010:
    • Lillian Zamecnik
    • Anthony Opperman
    • Robert Armstrong
    • Mara Gallagher
    • Ali Briggs
    • Benjamin Pinkie
    • Chen Yan
    • Matthew Richter
    • George Linderman
    • Bharath Velagapudi
    • Anna Handorf
    • Christian Wargo
    • Rebecca Simmons
    • Matthew Root

    Learn more about the Student Turning Point Society.

    For more information contact Kimyette Finley, 216.368.0521.