Blog

  • GM announces expansion of brake override software globally by 2012

    General Motors said it will expand use of “enhanced smart pedal,” otherwise known as brake override, globally to all passenger cars with automatic transmissions and electronic throttle control. The change involves modifying existing electronic controls to reduce power to the engine in cases where the brake and accelerator pedal are being depressed at the same time.

    GM says that the global rollout will be completed by the end of 2012.

    “News media analyses of government data consistently validates that GM’s safety record on this issue is among the strongest in the industry,” said Tom Stephens, vice chairman, GM Global Product Operations. “At the same time, we know safety is top of mind for consumers, so we are applying additional technology to reassure them that they can count on the brakes in their GM vehicle.”

    – By: Kap Shah


  • Motorola launches OCNN — with the Devour and Motoblur

    OCNN

    In one of the grandest smartphone news events that nobody saw, Motorola today launched OCNN — the Ocho Cinco News Network — all Chad Johnson (we don’t care what he changed his name to) all the time. So when the million-follower Twitterer (hey, that’s what they said, never mind it’s only 826,000) is tweeting platitudes, what he had for breakfast, or how he’s planning on actually contributing to the Bengals this season, know that he’s doing it with the Motorola Devour, Motoblur and, under the hood, Android.

    And so, we were one of the 113 people watching the live "news" conference. And we’re now contributing to the delusion of a so-so football player efforts of a start athlete to spread the value of social networking — and, by proxy, Android — and … and …

    We’re sorry, folks. Really, we are. (Erm, and if you’re an 85 fan, go ahead and check it out, we suppose.)

  • Well, This Ad Was In Poor Taste

    It seems a jewelry store is experiencing some backlash on Facebook for a print ad that they say they did not approve. Here’s the ad and their statement.

    The substance of the Facebook backlash can be summarized with this snippet from a comment: “My brother didn’t commit suicide on 11/23/08 by putting a gun to his head and pulling the trigger because he didn’t go to the right jeweler.”

    The jewelry store is trying to “take it seriously,” but the folks on Facebook are calling for a real apology.

    Here’s the statement:

    Thank you to everyone who commented on our recent City Pages Ad. We take your comments very seriously and are taking action because of them. This ad ran without prior viewing or approval by RF Moeller management and was created and published at City Pages by their writer and our spokesman, TD Mischke. Mr. Mischke would like to personally field any questions or concerns. His email address is [email protected]. If you email him directly, he will give you his phone number if you would like to speak with him about this advertisement.Thank you again – James Moeller

    What do you think? (Thanks, Dave!)

    poortastead.jpg

  • El BMW 328 Kamm Coupé, será mostrado en el Concorso d’Eleganza Villa d’Este

    bmw-kamm-coupe.jpg

    Uno de los coches de carrera clásicos de BMW que ha levantado más misterio a lo largo de casi 60 años, ha sido el BMW 328 Kamm Coupe, uno de los últimos coches de carreras que BMW desarrolló ante las puertas mismas de la Segunda Guerra Mundial. El diseño era muy avanzado aerodinámicamente para la época (a pesar de no ser muy agraciado a la vista), siendo uno de los primeros pasos de la casa de Münich en el campo de los diseños más aerodinámicos.

    Se construyeron cinco BMW 328 Kamm Coupé, en 1940 para la Mille Miglia de ese año, la cual ganó la marca con estos coches. Pero más tarde la guerra llegaría hasta las puertas mismas de BMW y su misma sede de Münich sería bombardeada por los Aliados. Afortunadamente, todos los modelos del 328 Kamm Coupé fueron salvados, aunque los triunfadores se repartirían los cinco coches al término de la guerra. Solamente uno quedó en poder de Ernst Loof, en esa época director de carreras de BMW y dueño del coche, ya que lo había comprado para su uso privado.

    bmw-kamm-coupeb.jpg

    Desafortunadamente, Loof no pudo mantener en su poder el coche mucho tiempo y tuvo que venderlo. El nuevo comprador aparentemente lo usó para competencias, ya que el coche sobreviviente fue casi destruido en un accidente a principios de los años 50´s.

    Este único ejemplar sobreviviente que la marca presentará restaurado en el Concorso d’Eleganza Villa d’Este, del 23 al 25 de abril en Italia, ha tardado casi 20 años en ser reconstruido, a pesar de que BMW ha empleado muchísimos recursos para la restauración (documentos de los archivos y de coleccionistas privados, el uso de los ordenadores del departamento de desarrollo de BMW y especialistas en carrocería y motores).

    Vía | Prensa del Grupo BMW



  • Unleaded Premium Fuel Is A Scam: Fact Or Fiction?

    Is saving $6.00 per tank worth the risk of a blown motor?

    A friend of mine (let’s call him “Stan”) is one of the smartest guys I know. He just authored a book on business process and works for one of the big financial powerhouses as some sort of a training guru. He recently hit me up for a recommendation on a domestic sedan, so I countered with the usual list of questions. One of them was “are you willing to use premium unleaded fuel”, to which Stan replied “unleaded premium is a scam”.

    When I stopped screaming at my email, I realized that if Stan thought this was the case, then so do a lot of other people. Manufacturer’s don’t do a good job of explaining this, and dealers are reluctant to point out that your new car will cost you more money to operate than you thought. So what’s the real deal? Is unleaded premium a requirement, a luxury or a scam? If you need it, why do you need it?

    Uh oh: pistons aren’t supposed to look like this one.

    First, let’s start with a little science. A fuel’s octane rating indicates how combustible it really is; contrary to popular belief, low octane fuels (standard unleaded) are more combustible than high octane fuels; specifically, they have a lower flashpoint. High octane fuels have a higher flashpoint because they’re intended for use in high compression engines. Oh, crap, I’ve lost you, haven’t I?

    Let’s back up one step and think about how a four stroke motor works. When the piston starts up the cylinder in the compression stage, both the pressure and the temperature inside that cylinder rise. In a diesel motor, this compression alone is enough to create the ignition; in a gasoline motor, a spark is usually required. Why do I say usually? Because using the wrong, low octane fuel can cause the air / fuel mixture to ignite before it’s supposed to. This is called detonation, and bad things happen to motors with uncontrolled detonation. Things that require motors to be replaced or rebuilt.

    Connecting rods aren’t supposed to look like this, either.

    Here’s the good news: modern technology has a way to address this. A device called a “knock sensor”, usually positioned on the side of the engine block, listens for the noises associated with detonation. When it senses them, it signals the motor to retard the timing, which allows the combustion to occur when it’s supposed to. The down side is that when this happens, you motor is making less power than the manufacturer intended it to. It’s literally trying to keep itself from blowing up.

    Now some bad news: knock sensors can’t always correct ignition timing enough to compensate for the wrong octane fuel. The editor of an automotive website recently found this out the hard way, when the brand-new Cadillac SRX Turbo he was driving blew it’s motor climbing a mountain pass outside of Ventura, California. The editor admitted to mistakenly filling the press fleet vehicle with regular unleaded instead of the required premium; the sequence of events that followed (retarded spark, turbo boost, cylinder overpressure, cracked engine block) left him stranded by the side of the road. Per Cadillac engineers, use of the wrong fuel was a contributing factor and not the primary cause; still, the incident may not have happened had the editor used the grade of fuel specified by the manufacturer.

    Confused? Don’t be, because here’s the breakdown: if your owner’s manual says unleaded premium only, use it every time you tank up. Sure, you’ll pay a few dollars more each time you fill up, but I’ll bet that it’ll still be less expensive over the life of the car than buying a new motor. If you want to see what fuel is required BEFORE you buy a car, just check inside the gas cap lid. If it says, “premium fuel only”, that’s what you need to use.

    If your manual says “premium fuel recommended” you can probably get by using the mid-grade stuff for normal driving. If you’re towing a trailer or driving in extreme conditions (up mountain passes, across the desert in summer, etc.), then buck up for a tank of premium. Don’t use the cheap stuff, no matter how tempting it may be.

    So what if your manual just calls for the use of “unleaded fuel”? Can you get better performance by running premium unleaded? Is the good stuff formulated to run cleaner, remove harmful deposits, whiten your teeth and leave your laundry smelling spring fresh? In a word, no; running premium fuel in cars that don’t require it will do nothing other than drain your wallet more quickly.


  • Watch Out For Drugstore Price Traps

    I was at a Rite-Aid a couple of weeks back and went to pick up some cheap dish detergent, and the bottles that I remembered being less than $1.50 were all in the $3-4 range. I left and found sanely-priced soap at another store a few blocks away. Our reader Stan just wrote in with a similar example, where he caught his local CVS charging him three times as much as a nearby competitor.

    Stan writes:

    Caught this while shopping at CVS yesterday. Apparently, a “Jumbo” styptic pencil costs $4.89 @ CVS. Stopped at Wegman’s down the street and the exact same item (same brand/packaging) cost $1.49. When I returned the styptic pencil to CVS, the sales clerk told me that “items at CVS are more expensive than at other stores” but agreed that the over 3x difference was a bit exorbitant.

  • SwankoLab User Interface Demo

    Can you tell I’m excited about this app? Haven’t even bought it yet! :D And BTW, I totally hope they iPad-ify this sucker (and Hipstamatic).

  • Evolved For Sushi | The Loom

    Ed Yong, thankfully, is all over a new study on how the microbes in the guts Japanese people acquired genes from ocean germs to digest sushi. It’s yet another example of the mind-blowing science emerging from the study of our microbiome–the trillions of non-human organisms that share our body with us. For more on the microbiome, listen to my recent podcast with microbiomist (I just made that up, but it feels so right) Rob Knight.

    I’d have blogged on this too, but I’m busy with something in the works for tomorrow. Stay tuned.


  • Pricing what’s inside

    SOMEONE managed to take apart the iPad:

    Materials for the iPad, which went on sale on April 3, include a touch-screen display that costs $95 and a $26.80 processor designed by Apple and manufactured by Samsung Electronics Co., according to El Segundo, California-based ISuppli…

    Once it took one apart, ISuppli found more silicon chips than it had expected to power interactions with the iPad’s 9.7- inch screen.

    “Because of the sheer scale of this device, we’re seeing more here than we expected,” Rassweiler said. Apple uses three chips to control the iPad’s touch screen, for example.

    Flash memory chips, obtained from various suppliers including Samsung, account for $29.50 in costs on the 16- gigabyte model, $59 in the 32-gigabyte version and $118 in the 64-gigabyte model, Rassweiler said. These chips push the cost of manufacturing the 32-gigabyte version of the iPad, which sells for $599, to $289.10. They boost the cost of the 64-gigabyte version, which sells for $699, to $348.10.

    Interesting stuff. The piece also notes that as Apple continues to produce iPads, it will get better at economising on components, allowing the firm to bring down its price.

    But hey, why doesn’t it bring its price down right now?

    Analysis by ISuppli indicates that components of the lowest-priced, 16-gigabyte iPad amounts to 52 percent of its retail price of $499. That leaves the iPad on par with other Apple products, including the iPhone 3GS. A high-end 64-gigabyte version of the iPad, which retails for $699, contains components that cost $348.10, according to ISuppli.

    One answer is that materials costs don’t begin to cover the full scope of the investment it took to generate a product. Microsoft Office can cost hundreds of dollars and comes in packaging worth less than a sawbuck (and if you download it, less than a cent). Production of the iPad involved thousands of man hours devoted to research, design, and programming, the cost of which is incorporated into the price of each device.

    And one can’t forget the demand side. Apple can charge for iPads what the market will bear. It has also become quite good at price discriminating. It has higher margins on the most expensive models, which may appeal to the set of technophiles who must have the top of the line product nevermind the cost. And Apple realises that early-adopters will pay a premium to have an iPad now, and after some interval of time it can lower the price to attract more value-minded customers.

    What one wouldn’t expect to see much of in the cost details for the iPad is marketing expense, as the press has handled that job pro bono, present company included. Still waiting for the pro quo, Apple (cough cough).

  • SwankoLab Instructional Video

    Heh… This would be a lot better Trolololo-ed. :D

  • Kosovo war crimes suspect arrested in Sweden

    [JURIST] Swedish Police on Wednesday arrested a Kosovo war crimes suspect. The suspect is accused of committing war crimes during the 1998-1999 Kosovo war in the small village of Cuska in May 1999. A Swedish police spokesperson did not release the man’s full name because of Swedish privacy laws but did state that the suspect is a Serbian man in his 30s. The Swedish Prosecution Authority will request on Friday that the suspect remain in custody until trial. It is not clear where the suspect will face charges.
    In March, a spokesperson for Serbia’s Office of the War Crimes Prosecutor announced the arrest of nine individuals suspected of committing war crimes during the Kosovo war. In June, Amnesty International (AI) marked the 10-year anniversary of the conflict’s end by reporting that many human rights abuses that occurred during the war in Kosovo have gone uninvestigated and unpunished. Prosecutors have nonetheless secured several convictions. A week after AI’s report, a Serbian court convicted four former paramilitary officers of killing 14 Albanians in northern Kosovo. In April 2009, four Serbian ex-policemen were convicted of killing of 48 Albanian civilians in Suva Reka.

  • The Treasury Gets A Great Auction And Yields Pull Back, But All This Means Is That Investors Are Fearful Again

    chart

    The folks are jumping up and down on CNBC about how the Treasury just pulled off an “A” auction.

    Bob Pisani called it “impressive.”

    Yields slipped and are well off 4% now, which is where they hit earlier this week. (The full results can be found here [.pdf])

    But before you bust out the champagne, just consider that Greece is in trouble, the Euro is down, and the stock market trouble.

    The easiest way to interpret this news is that this is flight-to-safety, and not much else. Sure it’s great news for TIm Geithner and Uncle Sam, but hardly a cause for celebration.

    Remember, the “V” in treasury yields is the most promising “V” there is.

    Here’s our Vincent Fernando from two days ago:

    Government bond yields can go up for many reasons, both good and bad. Investors might think U.S. creditworthiness is deteriorating due to large amounts of debt, or they could believe that inflation is likely to pick up and thus need to be compensated.

    At the same time, investors may demand higher yields from government debt if they expect higher interest rates from the Fed in the future, created by the Fed in response to a strengthening economy. They can also simply find other forms of investment more attractive, due to higher expected returns in alternatives like stocks. Thus we know U.S. government bond yields are rising, but the question is why.

    Are rising bond yields are positive or negative sign? Should we be worried that bond markets are ready to take America to task for its debt? Or should we be happy to see bond markets signaling a rebounding economy?

    Well today says it’s the latter, positive take on the bond market. Last Friday we had good news on the jobs front, we’ve recently had good news on the U.S. manufacturing front, and today we got good news on the U.S. services front. Bond yields have continued to surge. The yield curve has also steepened whereby the gap between short and long-term U.S. government debt has expanded.

    Bond investors aren’t demanding higher yields because they fear inflation. You can easily check the bond market’s inflation expectations by examining the difference between inflation-linked and plain vanilla U.S. bonds. These inflation expectations remain muted, despite the recent government bond yield surge, at just 2.4% priced-in and expected U.S. inflation per year out to 2028 according to The Economist.

    Bond traders don’t fear America’s creditworthiness either. Yields are rising on signs U.S. economic strength, such as is happening today. A stronger economy makes a country more creditworthy, thus you would expect bonds to rally (and their yield to fall) when good news comes out, if they are trading based on national creditworthiness.

    Rather, bond yields are rising because decent U.S. economic growth has now become far more likely. As Scott Grannis, the retired Western Asset economist at the blog Calafia Beach Pundit, says, U.S. bond markets could now be pricing in about 2-2.5% U.S. GDP growth going forward. It isn’t mind-blowing growth, but it isn’t too bad considering where we have come from.

    So bond yields are, yes, rising, but today shows that it is for the right reasons. They’re making a full-V, signaling a full-V for the broader economy as well.

    Join the conversation about this story »

  • Brian Austin Green Megan Protest California School Budget Cuts In FOD Sketch

    Brian Austin Green and Megan Fox won’t stand for the controversial budget cuts affecting teachers and students in California. The Hollywood lovers “Say No To Cuts” and take on “Governator” Arnold Schwarzenegger in a politically-charged sketch released on FunnyOrDie.com on Wednesday. In the sketch, Megan and Brian are appointed teacher, janitor, school nurse, and ESOL instructor for a classroom three times its maximum capacity.


  • Santa Anita Park Race 5 Horse Racing Betting Pick Wednesday 4-7-10

    Our horse racing pick will come from Race 5 at Santa Anita on Wednesday. It’s a Cal bred maiden race going 1 mile on the Turf for three year olds and up. With our free pick we will play on #3 My Boy Walsh to win. The fifth at Santa Anita is scheduled for a 6:05PM Eastern Time post and you can watch it on TVG.

    My Boy Walsh is ridden by Tyler Baze and trained by Gary Sherlock. This three year old gelding is lightly race and will be making his fourth start on Wednesday. He tried the turf for the first time in career and posted his best Brisnet figure with an 83, which is best in this field on the grass. I liked the fact he is stretching out to a mile in this one. He has a nice bullet work on March 24th leading to this event.

    Play #3 My Boy Walsh to win race 5 at Santa Anita 4-1 on the Morning Line.

    Post Time at 6:05PM Eastern Time televised by TVG

    Courtesy of Tonys Picks

  • PHOTO: KFC Double Down Spotted In The Wild

    Consumerist reader Ed must live in one of the test markets for the KFC Double Down — you know, the bacon sandwich on fried chicken “bread” — because he was able to snap this photo of the infamous sandwich days in advance of its April 12 national launch.

    While not as appetizing as the pic in the ad, I think it still looks tastier than vegan version, right?

  • Study: Fishing Boats Kill Millions—Not Thousands—of Sea Turtles | 80beats

    sea-turtleWe already knew that great numbers of sea turtles are killed when they’re caught up in the nets used by fishing operations around the world. But according to a study in Conservation Letters, the actual number of turtles accidentally killed over the last two decades has been vastly underestimated: Rather than counting in tens of thousands, study author Bryan Wallace argues, commercial fishing has probably killed sea turtles in the millions.

    The official records show about 85,000 turtles killed by fishing operations from 1990 to 2008. But Wallace, the science adviser for Conservation International’s sea turtle program, says that’s deceptively small accounting. “Because the reports we reviewed typically covered less than 1% of all fleets, with little or no information from small-scale fisheries around the world, we conservatively estimate that the true total is probably not in tens of thousands, but in the millions of turtles taken as bycatch in the past two decades,” said Dr Wallace [BBC News]. Six of the seven sea turtle species are presently listed as in danger. They include loggerheads, leatherbacks, hawksbills, Olive Ridleys, Kemp’s Ridleys and green sea turtles; the flatback, an endemic to Australia, is currently categorized as Data Deficient [CNN].

    The study covered several methods of commercial fishing: so-called long lines, gillnets, and trawls. “Trawlers are completely indiscriminate. The target might be shrimp but for every pound of shrimp that might comp up with a given haul, there might have five or 20lbs of bycatch. That could be turtles, it could be all sorts of things,” said Wallace [The Guardian]. However, trawls—which drag along the seafloor—can be equipped with “turtle excluder devices,” or TEDs, which are designed to keep out large marine mammals and come with a kind of trapdoor for turtles that are accidentally trapped. Some countries even require shrimp boats to carry them. “Long lines” stretch for miles behind the boat with baited hooks. But gillnets, National Geographic argues, might be the worst offenders because turtles ensnared in them have the least chance to reach the surface to breathe.

    It’s true that Wallace’s numbers are an extrapolation reached by the records that happened to be available (it would be rather time-consuming and expensive to survey small fishing operations all around the world). So there’s plenty of margin for error in the study’s guesses, and the National Fisheries Institute keyed on that fact to call the study something “outside of ground-truth science.” But even if Wallace’s numbers—which he calls conservative estimates— turn out to be a little exaggerated, it still means that the totals for turtles killed are far greater than the previous studies he looked at would suggest. Some further study of small fishing operations could help figure out how close the study’s extrapolations are, but in the meantime, sea turtles need all the help they can get.

    Wallace says he thinks that better catching systems like TEDs could dramatically reduce the total of accidentally killed turtles. That’s crucial, he says, because while fisherman have no particular malice toward turtles, asking them to save the sea reptiles out of altruism is just unrealistic. “It is really tricky,” he said. “You can imagine if you are a small-scale fisherman and your gillnet is your meal ticket and you’ve got a big leatherback that’s stuck and entangled in this thing–you are risking your own life trying to free the turtle” [National Geographic].

    Related Content:
    80beats: Turtle Shell Develops Through Embryonic Origami
    80beats: A Clue to the Evolutionary Riddle of How the Turtle Got Its Shell
    80beats: Proposal to Regulate De-Finning of Sharks De-Feated
    The Intersection: Do We Need Leatherback Turtles?
    DISCOVER: Sweeping the Ocean Floor, where strange sea creatures are caught on film

    Image: Projeto Tamar Brazil, Image Bank


  • Imaginary, underwater subway lines are always the most convenient route

    by Ashley Braun

    Transit Authority FiguresFor publicly transitive folks like myself, why does it seem that the fastest way between two points is an imaginary subway line? And a watery one, to boot!

    If I were an East Coaster, I’d definitely submerse myself in these non-existent, though wish-listily handy transit routes, even if their actual construction would be a big, wet flop.

    All a-surfboard!

     

     

     

     

     

     

    ——————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————————-

    Like what you see? Sign up to receive The Grist List, our email roundup of pun-usual green news just like this, sent out every Friday.

    Related Links:

    Colbert’s climatologist vs. weathercaster catfight

    KFC: Who needs buns when a chicken-bacon-chicken sandwich will do?

    How much renewable juice does it take to power an Apple iPad?






  • Worst Company In America Sweet 16: Capital One VS Ticketmaster

    It’s the face-off of exorbitant fees! In the first round, sports/concert ticket monopoly Ticketmaster thumped NBC. Meanwhile, in a battle of banks, Capital One edged out Chase (I have a feeling it’s the annoying “What’s in your wallet?” ads).

    So, Consumerist readers, which one of these companies deserves to be charged a $25 service fee with an APR of 30%?


    This is a post in our Worst Company In America 2010 series. The companies competing for this honor were chosen by you, the readers. Keep track of all the goings on at consumerist.com/tag/worst-company-in-america. Print the bracket, here.

  • Gut bacteria in Japanese people borrowed sushi-digesting genes from ocean bacteria | Not Exactly Rocket Science

    SushiJapanese people have special tools that let them get more out of eating sushi than Americans can. They are probably raised with these utensils from an early age and each person wields millions of them. By now, you’ve probably worked out that I’m not talking about chopsticks.

    The tools in question are genes that can break down some of the complex carbohydrate molecules in seaweed, one of the main ingredients in sushi. They are wielded by the hordes of bacteria lurking in the guts of every Japanese person, but not by those in American intestines. And most amazingly of all, this genetic cutlery set is a loan. Some gut bacteria have borrowed the seaweed-digesting genes from other microbes living in the coastal oceans. This is the story of how these genes emigrated from the sea into the bowels of Japanese people.

    Within each of our bowels live around a hundred trillion microbes, whose cells outnumber our own by ten to one. This ‘gut microbiome’ act like an extra organ, helping us to digest molecules in our food that we couldn’t break down ourselves. These include the large carbohydrate molecules found in the plants we eat. But marine algae – seaweeds – contain special sulphur-rich carbohydrates that aren’t found on land. Breaking these down is a tough challenge for our partners-in-digestion. The genes and enzymes that they normally use aren’t up to the task.

    Fortunately, bacteria aren’t just limited to the genes that they inherit from their ancestors. They can swap genes between individuals as easily as we humans trade money or gifts. This ‘horizontal gene transfer’ means that bacteria have an entire kingdom of genes, ripe for the borrowing. All they need to do is sidle up to the right donor. And in the world’s oceans, one such donor exists – a seagoing bacterium called Zobellia galactanivorans.

    Zobellia is a seaweed-eater. It lives on, and digests, several species including those used to make nori. Nori is an extremely common ingredient in Japanese cuisine, used to garnish dishes and wrap sushi. And when hungry diners wolfed down morsels of these algae, some of them also swallowed marine bacteria. Suddenly, this exotic species was thrust among our own gut residents. As the unlikely partners mingled, they traded genes, including those that allow them to break down the carbohydrates of their marine meals. The gut bacteria suddenly gained the ability to exploit an extra source of energy and those that retained their genetic loans prospered.

    This incredible genetic voyage from sea to land was charted by Jan-Hendrik Hehemann from the University of Victoria. Hehemann was originally on the hunt for genes that could help bacteria to digest the unique carbohydrates of seaweed, such as porphyran. He had no idea where this quest would eventually lead. Mirjam Czjzek, one of the study leaders, said, “The link to the Japanese human gut bacteria was just a very lucky, opportunistic hit that we clearly had no idea about before starting our project. Like so often in science, chance is a good collaborative fellow!”

    From oceans to bowels

    Zobellia_journey_seaweed_su

    Hehemann began with Zobellia, whose genome had been recently sequenced. This bacterium turned out to be the proud owner of no fewer than five porphyran-breaking enzymes. This group was entirely new to science, they are all closely related and they clearly originated in marine bacteria. Their unique ability earned them the name of ‘porphyranases’ and the genes that encode them were named PorA, PorB, PorC and so on.

    They are clearly not alone. Using his quintet as a guide, Hehemann found six more genes with similar abilities. Five of them hailed from the genomes of other marine bacteria – that was hardly surprising. But the sixth source was a far bigger shock: the human gut bacterium Bacteroides plebeius. What was an oceanic gene doing in such an unlikely species? Previous studies provided a massive clue. Until then, six strains of B.plebeius had been discovered, and all of them came from the bowels of Japanese people.

    Nori is, by far, the most likely source of bacteria with porphyran-digesting genes. It’s the only food that humans eat that contains any porphyrans and until recently, Japanese chefs didn’t cook nori before eating it. Any bacteria that lingered on the green fronds weren’t killed before they could mingle with gut bacteria like B.plebius. Ruth Ley, who works on microbiomes, says, “People have been saying that gut microbes can pick up genes from environmental microbes but it’s never been demonstrated as beautifully as in this paper.”

    In fact, B.plebeius seems to have a habit of scrounging genes from marine bacteria. Its genome is rife with genes that are more closely related to their counterparts in marine species like Zobellia than to those in other gut microbes. All of these borrowed genes do the same thing – they break down the complex carbohydrates of marine algae.

    To see whether this was a common event, Hehemann screened the gut bacteria of 13 Japanese volunteers for signs of porphyranases. These “gut metagenomes” yielded at least seven potential enzymes that fitted the bill, along with six others from another group with a similar role. On the other hand, Hehemann couldn’t find a single such gene among 18 North Americans. “We were trying at lunch to think about where you might see patterns this clean,” says Ley. “You’d have to find another group of people with a very specialised diet. Because this involved seaweed and marine bacteria, it might be one of the cleanest demonstrations you’d get.”

    For now, it’s not clear how long these marine genes have been living inside the bowels of the Japanese. People might only gain the genes after eating lots and lots of sushi but Hehemann has some evidence that they could be passed down from parent to child. One of the people he studied was an unweaned baby girl, who had clearly never eaten a mouthful of sushi in her life. And yet, her gut bacteria had a porphyranase gene, just as her mother’s did. We already known that mums can pass on their microbiomes to their children, so if mummy’s gut bacteria can break down seaweed carbs, then baby’s bugs should also be able to.

    Are we what we eat?

    This study is just the beginning. Throughout our history, our diet has changed substantially and every mouthful of new food could have acted as a genetic tasting platter for our gut bacteria to sample. Personally, I’ve been eating sushi for around two years ago and I was intrigued to know if my own intestinal buddies have gained incredible new powers since then. Sadly, Czjzek dispelled my illusions. “Today, sushi is prepared with roasted nori and the chance of making contact with marine bacteria is low,” she said. The project’s other leader, Gurvan Michel, concurs. He notes that of all the gut bacteria from the Japanese volunteers, only B.plebeius as acquired the porphyranase enzymes. “This horizontal gene transfer remains a rare event,” he says.

    Michel also says that for these genes to become permanent fixtures of the B.plebeius repertoire, the bacterium would have needed a strong evolutionary pressure to keep them. “Daily access to ingested seaweeds as a carbon source” would have provided such a pressure. My weekly nibbles on highly sterile pieces of sushi probably wouldn’t.

    That’s one question down; there are many to go. How did the advent of agriculture or cooking affect this genetic bonanza? How is the Western style of hyper-hygienic, processed and mass-produced food doing so now? As different styles of cuisines spread all over the globe, will our bacterial passengers also become more genetically uniform?

    The only way to get more answers is to accelerate our efforts to sequence different gut microbiomes. Let’s take a look at those of other human populations, including hunter-gatherers. Let’s peer into fossilised or mummified stool samples left behind by our ancestors. Let’s look inside the intestines of our closest relatives, the great apes. These investigations will tell us more about the intestinal genetic trade that has surely played a big role in our evolution.

    Rob Knight, a microbiome researcher from the University of Colorado, agrees. “This result reinforces the need to conduct a broad and culturally diverse survey of who harbours what microbes. The key to understanding obesity or IBD might well be in genes or microbes acquired under circumstances very different to those we experience in Western society.” Gastronomics, anyone?

    Reference: Nature http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nature08937

    Images: nori by Alice Wiegand; sushi chef by Alex Kovach; Zobellia by Tristan Barbeyron; seaweed by Mirjam Czjzek

    More on microbiomes:

    More on horizontal gene transfer:

    Twitter.jpg Facebook.jpg Feed.jpg Book.jpg