Blog

  • Tidy Tuesday – Clean Your Corners

    Have you ever noticed that the corners of your rooms are dirtier than the rest of the house? Maybe it is because vents and breezes blow things around until they land in the corner, never to move again. Well, at least not until you vacuum them up the next day. Today, I’m cleaning all of my corners after yesterday’s big “I’m bored. What can I do? Can I do the vacuuming?” event, because they got missed and I didn’t want to re-clean in front of my helpers. (Children and some grownups tend to clean right in the middle of a room without thinking about the fact that the space under the sofa or that corner over there needs to be vacuumed, too.)So, why did I wait until the next day to do the job right?

    cleaning corners

    Going right behind helpers and re-cleaning isn’t a good way to make them feel capable and useful. Since you have children help with household chores to teach responsibility, to build stronger families and to do any number of other good things, you don’t want to undo all the good by destroying their self esteem and making them feel inadequate. Instead, you may want to wait until they are in school to clean your corners properly. Then, guide them to clean those areas by modeling the right way to do it another day.

    Photo: SXC

    Post from: Blisstree

    Tidy Tuesday – Clean Your Corners

  • Happy Holidays to you & yours..

    I wish everyone this Christmas that it be so special that you never ever feel lonely and be surrounded by loved ones throughout the year! May everyone have friends at their fire, blessings in their home, and joy & happiness in their heart always. Everyone on here is special, and they are unique and that is what makes it nice. Hope 2010 is a great year for everyone on DF. This has been one **** of a year for me, having 3 great friends pass away, the loss of my Dad and so much more stuff that has went on. This year also did give us a new grandson that is awesome and I was blessed to set some new sales records at work and things for 2010 looks good at work.

    A toast to everyone at DF please be safe this Holiday season, may all you wishes come true!

    In the old days, it was not called the Holiday Season; the Christians called it ‘Christmas’ and went to church; the Jews called it ‘Hanukkah’ and went to synagogue; the atheists went to parties and drank. People passing each other on the street would say ‘Merry Christmas!’ or ‘Happy Hanukkah!’ or (to the atheists) ‘Look out for the wall!’ Dave Barry, "Christmas Shopping: A Survivor’s Guide

  • Fracaso de Copenhague es analizado por Europa

    BRUSELAS, EFE
    Los ministros europeos de Medio Ambiente se reúnen hoy tras el fracaso de la Cumbre sobre cambio climático de Copenhague para analizar lo ocurrido y estudiar cómo reconducir las negociaciones el año que viene, bajo las presidencias rotativas de la Unión Europea (UE) de España y Bélgica.

    “Nadie sabe qué hacer”, reconoció una fuente diplomática que también aseguró que la UE “fue dejada de lado” por Estados Unidos, China, India, Sudáfrica y Brasil, que llegaron a un acuerdo de mínimos por su cuenta sin respetar el sistema tradicional de negociación de Naciones Unidas.

    Europa marginado
    Después de Copenhague, las dos únicas citas previstas hasta el momento son la reunión de la ONU de México en noviembre de 2010 y otro encuentro a escala técnica también en el seno de Naciones Unidas que se celebrará en Bonn (Alemania) el próximo mes de junio, con España aún al frente de la UE.
    Los europeos no han tenido aún tiempo material de reaccionar, pero ya tienen claro que se han equivocado en su planteamiento y que deben calibrar de nuevo su posición para evitar que ocurra lo mismo en México.

    El afán de liderazgo de la UE que anunció con un año de antelación un compromiso unilateral de reducción de emisiones del 20% para 2020 pudo ser el factor que dejó directamente fuera de la mesa a los europeos, interpretaron estas fuentes.

    Expertos comunitarios indicaron, por otro lado, que la UE mantendrá su compromiso de reducción del 20%, pero no llegará al 30% que había prometido si otros actores internacionales hacían un esfuerzo equivalente.

    En lo económico
    El máximo logro conseguido en la capital danesa fue el acuerdo para crear un fondo de financiación anticipada (2010-2012) de 30 mil millones de dólares para ayudar a países en desarrollo a combatir el calentamiento global y otro que tendrá que haber llegado a los 100 mil millones de dólares anuales en 2020.

    No obstante, el texto final sólo señala que esta financiación provendrá de fuentes privadas y públicas sin especificar cuánto aportará cada país.
    Fuente Bibliográfica

  • FriendFeed Is the Testing Ground for the Upcoming OAuth WRAP Protocol

    Online identity is one of the biggest themes on the web today and a number of providers, most notably Facebook and Google, are battling it out to become the most powerful player in the field. On the other hand, there is a great tendency towards integration and interoperability between various web services. One increasingly popular way of enabling this is OAuth, a protocol which allows sites to share private data in a secure manner. The next generation OAuth WRAP specification is getting fleshed out and this time around it gets the full support of Facebook which has now introduced an experimental implementation on FriendFeed, which it acquired last summer.

    “While Facebook Connect and our APIs do not use OAuth today, we’ve been working over the past month to share what we’ve learned with the broader community and shape both the new OAuth WRAP specification and OAuth’s IETF standardization effort,” Facebook’s David Recordon writes.

    This move is interesting from two perspectives. For one, it makes a definite commitment from Facebook to the standard. The social network has had great success with Connect which serves a very similar purpose to OAuth’s albeit with a more limited scope as it is restricted to Facebook data, but it plans to support the open standard as it moves on. The … (read more)

  • Post-Copenhagen pledge: Coal free future begins in Kentucky

    by Jeff Biggers

    This post was co-written by Stephanie Pistello, Ben Evans, and Ben Sollee, co-founders of the Coal Free Future Project.

    On the heels of the Copenhagen Climate Summit, we plan to make our own post-Copenhagen pledge here at home: It’s time to envision a coal-free future. It’s time for clean energy independence.  

    For those of us in the anti-mountaintop removal and anti-coal-fired plant movements, we believe this means we must start in coal country.

    For starters, here in Kentucky we disagree with Commerce Lexington that energy legislation is “the most immediate threat to Kentucky’s business climate.”

    Nothing could be further from the truth for Lexington, Kentucky, and the rest of our nation. Dirty energy led to Lexington’s embarrassing selection last year as the worst carbon footprint contributor in the nation. Commerce Lexington has taken a giant carbon step backwards.

    In 1776, Thomas Paine challenged our country to embrace the cause of independence over compromise. In a moment of crisis, he declared: “We have it in our power to make the world over again.”

    Our modern-day Paine, James Hansen at the NASA Goddard Center, has issued a similar clarion call: “Coal is the single greatest threat to civilization and all life on our planet. Our global climate is nearing tipping points.”

    It’s time to envision a coal-free future. It’s time for clean energy independence.

    Coal mining, which provides 45 percent of our electricity, will not end tomorrow. Every coal miner deserves a right to a sustainable livelihood; given the legacy of our coal miners, we also believe no coal miner should be displaced from his or her job until we develop clean energy alternatives. This means that coalfield residents, like all Americans, deserve a road map for a feasible transition to clean-energy jobs—including a Coal Miner’s GI Bill for retraining and a massive reinvestment in sustainable economic development in coalfield communities—before we reach a point of no return.

    All coal mining communities know that the first time in 25 years, utilities coal stockpiles have increased during the summer; absentee coal companies are cutting jobs and idling higher-cost mines to keep their stock holders happy in a period of slumping demand; recent U.S. Geological Survey estimates place “peak coal” production as early as 2020.

    As grandchildren of black-lung-afflicted coal miners from Kentucky, Illinois, and southwestern Virginia, we honor our families’ sacrifices in recognizing, not denying, the true cost of coal. Our grandfathers benefited from a transition to mechanization to improve mine safety. The time has come for a transition to clean-energy jobs.

    A just transition, of course, means more than rhetoric about green jobs—it will require not only a shift in massive investments and sustainable economic development, but a change in our long-standing policies that have allowed coal country to be the sacrifice zone for the nation.

    Coal is not cheap nor clean; coal has been killing us—for over 200 years. Over 104,000 Americans have died in coal-mining accidents; three coal miners die daily from black-lung disease. Millions of acres of forests and farmlands have been strip-mined into oblivion; pioneering communities have been plundered. Half of Americans live within an hour of a toxic coal ash dump.

    The Physicians for Social Responsibility recently found that coal “contributes to four of the top five causes of mortality in the U.S. and is responsible for increasing the incidence of major diseases.”

    The National Academy of Scientists totaled costs of coal at more than $62 billion in “external damages” to our health and lives. A West Virginia University report noted the coal industry “costs the Appalachian region five times more in early deaths than it provides in economic benefits.”

    In Kentucky, according to a Mountain Association of Community Economic Development study, coal may provide $528 million in state revenue, but costs $643 million in state expenditures.

    Nothing has motivated our commitment for clean energy more than the tragedy of mountaintop-removal mining. We have seen the devastation of clear-cutting our nation’s great forests and carbon sink of Appalachia and blowing up its oldest mountain range. We have met the casualties of absentee commerce; grieving parents who have lost loved ones to coal slurry-contaminated water; veterans and elderly who endure blasting, fly rock and silica dust; families who have seen their homes washed away in floods caused by erosion; streams poisoned with mining waste; boarded-up communities, strangled by a boom-and-bust single economy.

    The plunder of Appalachia must end.

    More so, with coal-fired plants contributing over 30 percent of our CO2 emissions, everyone’s fate is connected to the coalfields now.

    In the end, our fiduciary responsibility to our children demands a new way of generating our electricity in Kentucky and the country. It also affords us a great opportunity for economic and social revitalization

    Clean energy independence, not coal, will bring more sustainable jobs.

    Wind, solar, hydropower and turbine manufacturing, along with weatherization, retrofitting appliances and homes, could create jobs. The Appalachian Regional Commission found that “energy-efficiency investments could result in an increase of 77,378 net jobs by 2030” in the region.

    For us, such a clean energy revolution begins with the proposed Smith # 1 coal-fired plant in eastern Kentucky. Instead of a costly coal-fired dinosaur, a recent study found that a combination of “energy efficiency, weatherization, hydropower, and wind power initiatives in the East Kentucky Power Cooperative region would generate more than 8,750 new jobs for Kentucky residents, with a total impact of more than $1.7 billon on the region’s economy over the next three years.”

    Ultimately, this clean energy independence would meet the energy needs of EKPC customers and cost less than the proposed coal plant.

    So, this is our Copenhagen pledge at home: It’s time to imagine a coal-free future.

    For more on the Coal Free Future Project, see: www.coalfreefuture.org

     

    Related Links:

    What happens now for the forests?

    Copenhagen coal in the stocking?

    The top green stories of the ‘00s






  • VIDEO: The story behind the iconic design of Pink

    The story behind the iconic design of Pink Floyd’s “Dark Side of the Moon” (from this documentary about the album’s creation). The direction given by the client: “Simple, bold, and dramatic.”

  • Repatriation: Tetiky paintings return to Egypt fro Louvre in France

    drhawass.com (Zahi Hawass)

    With photo. For anyone who missed the story there’s a good summary on Al Ahram Weekly by Nevine El-Aref explaining the background to the return of the paintings to Egypt (also with photo).

    I am pleased that the five paintings from the tomb of Tetiky have been returned to Egypt from the Louvre Museum.

    It was very interesting that when our President Hosni Mubarak visited Paris last week, President Nicolas Sarkozy of France placed one of the paintings in the hall for President Mubarak when he arrived, so that he could symbolically receive it. This gesture shows that France is willing to return stolen artefacts to Egypt.

    I sent four crates from the Cairo Museum with Sayed Hassan, the assistant director of the Museum to receive the artefacts. They were well protected and travelled back to Egypt on EgyptAir to Cairo. Representatives of the SCA met them at the airport and transported them to the Cairo Museum, where they are now.

    We are now looking into the possibility of replacing the five paintings in the tomb, TT 15. I think it would be very difficult to put them back in the tomb, because it was severely damaged when thieves stole the artefacts. I believe returning these artefacts to Egypt is a good example to show that any museum that buys stolen artefacts will have an immediate reaction against them. However, because of the return of these artefacts, the Louvre expedition at Saqqara will be allowed to resume.

  • General Mobile Introduces “Storeoid”

    App stores are all the rage these days.  From carriers to handset makers, it seems like everyone is getting in on them.  It should come as no surprise then that General Mobile has decided to throw their hat in the ring.  Our contact at General Mobile has passed along some screen shots that show their forthcoming “Storeoid” app store.  It’s expected that this will be loaded on all future General Mobile handsets going forward. (more…)

  • Fennec, the mobile Firefox, is ‘days away’ from release for your Nokia N900

    firefoxlogo

    Fennec, Mozilla’s mobile version of Firefox, is “days away” from release. It will initially be available for the Nokia N900; don’t expect an iPhone version anytime soon.

    If all goes according to plan, the browser should be available before the end of the year. It’s been in development for a year and a half.

    What will Fennec do to convince you to try it out, much less switch to it full-time (provided you have a Nokia N900, of course)? There’s a clever syncing feature that ensures whatever you view on your desktop version of Firefox will be available on the mobile version. That is, if I’m reading the Wikipedia entry on, say, WrestleMania 10 on my desktop, that same Web page will be displayed when I launch the mobile version of the browser. Handy, yes.

    Fennec will have tabbed browsing. The AwesomeBar also makes an appearance.

    And yes, there will be Add-Ons. Whether that means you’ll be able to load up Adblock Plus (don’t leave home without it!) and Scriptmonkey and so forth isn’t exactly clear. Maybe you’ll need mobile-specific Add-Ons?

    As for that iPhone version jab: since when did Apple approve Apps that replicate “core functionality” of the iPhone? (Mobile Safari says hi.) Your best bet is to hope someone is able to get the code up and running on Apple’s little device, then releases a binary on one of those Jailbroken App repositories.

    Crunch Network: CrunchGear drool over the sexiest new gadgets and hardware.


  • The Homies 2009: Day 16: 20 Minutes Left to Vote!!

    2010_01_06-Homies.jpg>> Homies: Home Cooking Page

    It’s a neck-and-neck race for the Home Cooking Homies award of 2009! If you haven’t voted yet, you’ve got 20 minutes to get your vote in.

    Congrats to all of the six finalists—each one is a fantastic blog, chosen by readers from a total of 326 nominated entries. Voting will close today, January 6, at 5 pm EST, and the winner will be announced tomorrow!

    Read Full Post


  • Rethinking Android App Piracy

    Every couple of weeks, somebody posts a link to some site that offers free pirated downloads of paid Android apps. Hacking a handful of phones to automatically slurp down the latest stuff on the Market is almost trivial, so this sort of thing will happen regularly.

    The question is, what should the average developer do about it?

    First, think about it with a level head. Yes, finding your stuff pirated raises emotions. No, being emotional when making business decisions is not a good idea — and dealing with piracy needs to be first and foremost a business decision.

    I would start by ensuring you have a handle on the problem. Assuming your application needs or can justify the INTERNET permission, hook up with Flurry or some other analytics provider and start collecting data on the use of your app. I suspect that few pirated copies somehow attempt to disable such logging. Comparing the number of unique users reported via analytics and the number of unique users you get from the Android Market and other channels will give you a sense for how many pirated copies of your app are in use.

    For the sake of argument, let’s say you have determined there are ~10,000 active users of pirated copies of your app. Considering there are only a few million Android devices in use, 10,000 would be substantial.

    Next, you need to make an estimate of how many of those users would have found your application through traditional channels and elected to pay for it. Each of those is a significant hurdle, as there is no assurance that users of pirated apps are going to meander the Market much to find legitimate apps, let alone buy them.

    Let’s say that there’s a 30% chance that a pirated-app user would have found your app in a legit channel and another 30% chance that those who find it would pay. Both of those percentages feel generous to me, as app “findability” is a big-time problem in mobile and paying anything for an app is a non-trivial barrier. But, with those odds, you have actually “lost” 900 sales (10,000 x 30% x 30%). And, let’s say you are netting 0.65 USD per sale after Market fees and such.

    That means, for all those pirates, you’re really out $585, regardless of how many legit sales you have. Obviously, you will need to tailor all of these numbers for your own price and so on.

    So, the question then becomes: what is the best use of your time? If closing down piracy is super-easy for you, such that you can take care of it just a few hours, it’s probably worth doing. If, on the other hand, trying to stop piracy of your app will take a lot of time and effort, you might consider whether you will do better devoting that time toward more marketing (increasing exposure and, therefore, legitimate sales) or towards an improved app (increasing the odds of purchases and, therefore, legitimate sales) or towards a business model that lets you distribute the app for free, so piracy is no longer an issue and might even be beneficial.

    What you do not want to do is just jump into a long drawn-out battle against the pirates based on pure emotion instead of the facts of your business. Every hour you spend fighting piracy is an hour you lose for things that, hopefully, matter more to you, such as family, friends, or football (of the round or oblong variety).

    Similarly, re-check your analysis from time to time. As Android grows, piracy may grow, and there may come a time when it becomes fruitful for you to invest the time, even if it does not make much sense today.

    If you are interested in a more substantial analysis of why the effective price of your app will head to zero over time, I heartily recommend Mike Masnick’s posts on the Grand Unified Theory of the Economics of Free, also collected in his limited-edition book Approaching Infinity.

    Popular Posts That You Might Enjoy!


  • If Saab dies, who stands to benefit? AutoTrader thinks it’s BMW and Audi

    Filed under: ,

    When General Motors announced it was sending Saab to that great Viking longboat in the sky, AutoTrader.com dug through its search database to see where bereft Saab customers would turn to for consolation. This will be a surprise to almost no one, but other European marques top the list of substitutes.

    BMW was the most cross-shopped vehicle among people at AutoTrader’s site looking for Saabs, with Audi a very close second, beating Volvo and Volkswagen for the next spots. The only mild surprise is that Toyota took the number five slot, ahead of two other Japanese brands, and Mercedes-Benz in eighth You can read the press release after the jump for the complete ranking of Saab alternatives. In case you were wondering, Spyker didn’t make list…

    [Source: AutoTrader.com]

    Continue reading If Saab dies, who stands to benefit? AutoTrader thinks it’s BMW and Audi

    If Saab dies, who stands to benefit? AutoTrader thinks it’s BMW and Audi originally appeared on Autoblog on Tue, 22 Dec 2009 10:29:00 EST. Please see our terms for use of feeds.

    Permalink | Email this | Comments

  • Talkin’ Pre (& Pixi) – Week ending 19 Dec

    Verizon… wow! Palm’s earnings… owww!

    This was a week with much anticipation. RIMM was the star of Thursday’s earning reports. Palm brought up the rear and the stock got pounded the day after. On the positive side, there was buzz about an expansion of carriers (i.e. Verizon) and CES announcement(s). So let’s talk Pre and Pixi!

    According to notes from Dieter, during the investor conference call, CEO Jon Rubinstein confirmed that webOS 1.3.5 is coming soon and will have a bevy of improvements, including:

    • Allowing for installation of more apps
    • Enhances WiFi and app performance
    • Improved battery life
    • Increased speed and responsiveness on the Palm Pixi

    read more

  • Repatriation: Hawass on the Rosetta Stone

    Asharq Alawsat (Zahi Hawass)

    I recently travelled to London to give a lecture at the British Museum on my archaeological discoveries, and to host a book-signing event for my book ‘A Secret Voyage’ that has finally been published in English. This book deals with the experiences of my career [as an archaeologist] from my view on the beauty of the Pharaonic civilization, to [discussing] the Pharaonic view on love, religion, daily life, and festivals, and also includes stories about my latest discoveries in the Valley of the Kings.

    This visit came a long time after my last visit to the British capital, and I told journalists and reporters from various media organizations that I had come to London to demand the return of the Rosetta Stone that is housed by the British Museum. The Rosetta Stone was part of an agreement concluded by the French with the British following the Battle of the Nile [also known as the Battle of Aboukir Bay]. The French fleet was defeated in this battle, forcing it to leave Egypt, which then fell under British influence.

    One of the conditions of this treaty was the French surrendering all antiquities in their possession to the English, including the Rosetta Stone, which held the key to the secrets of the ancient Pharaonic civilization. The secrets of the hieroglyphics were later discovered by French scholar [Jean-François] Champollion, even though the Rosetta Stone itself was on display at the British Museum.

    In truth, I had no desire to wade into this battle, but I told the media that Egypt is demanding the return of six individual antiquities, and that the real home of these artefacts is their native Egypt. These six antiquities are; the bust of Queen Nefertiti in Berlin’s Neues Museum, the Rosetta Stone at the British Museum, the Dendera Zodiac at the Louvre in Paris, the statue of Great Pyramid architect Hemiun in Hildesheim’s Pelizaeus Museum, the bust of Prince Ankhhaf in Boston’s Museum of Fine Arts, and the statue of King Ramses II in the Turin Museum.

    See the above page for details.

  • Autosomal Aneuploidy – Cytogenetic Abnormalities

    Cytogenetic abnormalities are what I have learnt during my internship in Hospital Kuala Lumpur. Today, I’m going to introduce Autosomal Aneuploidy in this Cytogenetics and Cancer Research blog.
     
    In Cytogenetics, the term aneuploidy refers to cytogenetic abnormalities in which all or part of one or more chromosomes is added or deleted. Autosomal aneuploidy is the abnormality that does not involve the sex chromosomes. Sometimes, the abnormalities can be either numerical or structural. Normally we only have pair of chromosomes which are structurally similar. Other than that, it can be recognized as abnormal. Those cytogenetic abnormalities can be present only in some cells which we called mosaicism or in all cells.

    autosomal aneuploidy | Cytogenetic abnormalities
     

    Meiotic Nondisjunction Causes Autosomal Aneuploidy

    The origin of autosomal aneuploidy is because of meiotic nondisjunction. The meiotic nondisjunction is random for all autosomes except for chromosome 21. Chromosome 21 has shown the highest frequency of autosomal aneuploidy.
     
    According to cytogenetic studies, the incidence of autosomal aneuploidy in spontaneous abortuses (die before birth) is much higher than incidences in newborns. So, what is the case for aneuploidy actually observed in spontaneous abortuses or liveborns? All trisomies for all autosomes have been reported in spontaneous abortuses. The fetal only can survive if and only if the trisomies are in mosaic form. However, there are still many exceptions for the trisomies 13, 18 and 21. Some of the foetus still can survive even though the trisomies 13, 18 or 21 are in nonmosaic form.
     
    Why the frequencies of trisomy for each chromosome might be similar at the time of conception but differ greatly among abortuses and liveborns especially for trisomy 21? It can be explained by the devastating effect of chromosomal imbalance. Most of the autosomal aneuploidies are very deleterious and lethal in the pre-embryonic stage. As a result, those abnormalities are unrecognized and, therefore, unstudied spontaneous abortions.
     
    Furthermore, the lethality of a particular autosomal aneuploidy is related to the gene content of the particular chromosome. Aneuploidies for the gene rich chromosomes are less likely to survive. However, the less gene rich chromosomes like chromosome 13, 18 and 21 are more likely to survive to term.
     
    Anyway, we will just focus on those observed in liveborns for the autosomal aneuploidy in Cytogenetics. I will talk more details about the monosomies and trisomies in my future post. Stay tuned! :)

    Autosomal Aneuploidy – Cytogenetic Abnormalities is a post from: Cytogenetics and Cancer Research

    Related Posts

  • Can Rolling Stone Sell T-Shirts Of Its Covers? It’s Not That Simple, Apparently…

    Well, here’s an interesting lawsuit. Apparently, Rolling Stone magazine decided it wanted to try selling t-shirts of some of its covers. Considering the market for t-shirts, that might not be a bad idea (especially when compared to the market for magazines these days). Obviously, the magazine and its publisher Wenner Media own the copyright on their own covers, so there shouldn’t be any problem, right? Not so fast. Since the covers usually include musicians, and those musicians have vast merchandising businesses themselves, some of the companies who handle the merchandising for some top artists have sued, claiming that they have exclusive licensing deals to sell products with those musicians. Rolling Stone is arguing both that it has a First Amendment right to do this, and a fair use defense to any intellectual property claim. I’m reminded of a recent case involving magazine covers, where the use of those magazine covers in a book (by someone else) was deemed fair use, though the details are obviously quite different. Still, it probably won’t surprise many people that I tend to think Rolling Stone should prevail here. The key aspect of what they’re selling is that the designs are Rolling Stone covers — not specifically which band is on the cover.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story





  • ARTICLE: List of most-recycled phones released, is RAZR sharp

    Cell phone list

    Boy, do times change.  Back in 2004, the Motorola RAZR (in that original silver color, if you remember correctly) was the hot ticket.  At about $400 on a two-year agreement, it was the phone that everyone wanted.  Fast forward to 2009, and it and the V3M hold the top two spots on a recycling list.  Ouch.

    Phone recycling company ReCellular has released their annual ten most-recycled handset of the year list, and it’s certainly interesting.  Besides the RAZR line taking the first two spots, Motorola and LG each take the lead with four devices on the list, followed by a Nokia and a Samsung device each.  What’s more, seven of the devices were released on Verizon Wireless at some point, while three were on AT&T/Cingular.  Some very well known (and reliable) devices are on the list: the Motorola E815, LG VX8300, and Nokia 6010.

    Who knows – in a few years, the original Apple iPhone model may be on the list.  Has anyone owned one of these devices, and more importantly, are you still using it?  Sound off!

    Via: Engadget Mobile


  • Repatriation: More re Nefertiti bust

    ANSAMed

    Egypt has firmly continued to reiterate that the bust of Nefertiti was taken out of the country illegally, and has officially requested that it be returned, according to the head of the High Council for Antiquities, Zahi Hawass, after a meeting in Cairo with Friederike Seyfried, director of the Egyptian Museum within the Berlin’s New Museum. The bust, which dates back to about 3,400 years ago, was discovered in 1912 in southern Egypt by the German archaeologist Ludwig Borchardt, and Egypt has been asking for its restitution since the 1930s. According Hawass, the German archaeologist managed to bring the statue to Germany by claiming that it was a plaster bust and not the one in limestone of the queen. He said that ”this confirms that the statue left Egypt in a non-ethical manner, and that Germany used deception and fraud in that period.” Berlin instead claims that the purchase was legal, and the museum’s director has presented a document which allegedly provides proof.

    Earth Times

    Egypt has not made a formal request for Germany to return the bust of Queen Nefertiti, the director Berlin’s Egyptian Museum said on Monday, defending the museum’s right to the famous artefact. Museum director Friederike Seyfried said the 3,500-year-old limestone sculpture was not the subject of a Sunday meeting in Cairo with Egypt’s antiquities chief, Zahi Hawass.

    Hawass was quoted by Egyptian media Monday as saying “the Nefertiti bust was smuggled out of Egypt by a German archaeologist, through deception and obfuscation,” adding that he would use official channels to demand its return.

    In response to the reports, Seyfried stated that documents seen by Hawass, detailing the 1912 excavation during which the Nefertiti bust was discovered, clearly demonstrated that Nefertiti was rightfully in Berlin.

    “The German position is clear and unequivocal. The acquisition of the bust by the Prussian state was lawful,” Seyfried said.

    The discussion in Cairo, she added, had revolved around future cooperation, including shared exhibitions and an exchange programme for conservators.

    drhawass.com (Zahi Hawass)

    A meeting was held today at the offices of the Supreme Council of Antiquities between Dr. Zahi Hawass, Secretary General of the SCA, and Dr. Friederike Seyfried, Director of the Aegyptisches Museum und Papyrussammlung in Berlin, to discuss the Bust of Nefertiti.

    Dr. Seyfried presented Dr. Hawass with copies of all of the key documentation held by the Berlin Museum concerning this iconic piece. This includes the protocol of January 20, 1913, written by Gustave Lefevre, the official who signed the division of finds on behalf of the Egyptian Antiquities Service, as well as excerpts from the diary of Ludwig Borchardt, the excavator of the piece. These materials confirm Egypt’s contention that Borchardt did act unethically, with intent to deceive: the limestone head of the queen is listed on the protocol as a painted plaster bust of a princess. Borchardt knew, as his diary shows, that this was the queen herself; he also knew that the head was of limestone covered with plaster and painted, not simply of plaster, as this was clearly visible through inspection of the piece itself. It seems that there was an agreement between Borchardt and Lefevre that all the plaster pieces (which included an important group of plaster masks of the royal family at Amarna) would go to Berlin, and this appears to have been one way that Borchardt misled Lefevre to ensure that the bust would also go to Berlin.

    As director of the Berlin Musem, Dr. Seyfried does not have the authority to approve the return of the head to Egypt, but will act as liaison between Dr. Hawass and the relevant German officials, Dr. Hermann Parzinger, President of the Prussian Cultural Heritage Foundation, and Dr. Bernd Neumann, Minister of State for Culture.

    Based on the information currently in the possession of the Supreme Council of Antiquities, Dr. Hawass will call a meeting of the National Committee for the Return of Stolen Artifacts this week, which will then make a formal request for the return of the Bust of Nefertiti.

    New York Times (Julie Bloom)

    Egypt has found new evidence to support its demand for the return of Queen Nefertiti’s bust, right, from Berlin, Bloomberg News reported. According to the Supreme Council of Antiquities in Cairo the diary of the archaeologist who discovered the 3,500-year-old bust shows that he misled authorities when it was transferred abroad. In an e-mail statement the council said the diary of Ludwig Borchardt, who found the bust in 1912, showed he knew the head was of Queen Nefertiti but instead reported it as a “painted plaster bust of a princess.” The statement said, “These materials confirm Egypt’s contention that Borchardt did act unethically with the intent to deceive.”
  • Existing Home Sales Up Strong In November On Tax Credit

    Existing And New Home Sales

    Existing home were sales up strong again in November, as buyers squeezed in before the original tax credit expired.

    Even the NAR is already dampening expectations for December and early next year, however.  And mortgage rates have begun to rise.

    (Graphic from Northern Trust does not include November numbers).

    National Association of REALTORS:

    Existing-home sales rose again in November as first-time buyers rushed to close sales before the original November 30 deadline for the recently extended and expanded tax credit, according to the National Association of Realtors®.

    Existing-home sales – including single-family, townhomes, condominiums and co-ops – rose 7.4 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate1 of 6.54 million units in November from 6.09 million in October, and are 44.1 percent higher than the 4.54 million-unit pace in November 2008. Current sales remain at the highest level since February 2007 when they hit 6.55 million.

    Lawrence Yun, NAR chief economist, said the rise was expected. “This clearly is a rush of first-time buyers not wanting to miss out on the tax credit, but there are many more potential buyers who can enter the market in the months ahead,” he said. “We expect a temporary sales drop while buying activity ramps up for another surge in the spring when buyers take advantage of the expanded tax credit, which hopefully will take us into a self-sustaining market in the second half of 2010. In all, 4.4 million households are expected to claim the tax credit before it expires and balance should be restored to the housing sector with inventories continuing to decline.”

    An NAR practitioner survey2 shows first-time buyers purchased 51 percent of homes in November, compared with an upwardly revised 50 percent of transactions in October.

    According to Freddie Mac, the national average commitment rate for a 30-year, conventional, fixed-rate mortgage fell to 4.88 percent in November from 4.95 percent in October; the rate was 6.09 percent in November 2008. Last month’s mortgage interest rate was the second lowest on record after bottoming at 4.81 percent in April 2009.

    NAR President Vicki Cox Golder, owner of Vicki L. Cox & Associates in Tucson, Ariz., said conditions are optimal for buyers in the current market. “Inventories have steadily declined and are closer to balanced levels, which indicate home prices in many areas are either stabilizing or could soon stabilize and return to normal appreciation patterns,” she said. “This means buyers still have good choices but are purchasing near the bottom of the price cycle with historically low mortgage interest rates. Throw a tax credit on top and it really doesn’t get any better for buyers with secure jobs and long-term ownership plans.”

    Total housing inventory at the end of November declined 1.3 percent to 3.52 million existing homes available for sale, which represents a 6.5-month supply3 at the current sales pace, down from an 7.0-month supply in October.

    Raw unsold inventory figures are 15.5 percent below a year ago. The last time there was a lower supply of homes on the market was April 2006 when it was at a 6.1-month supply.

    “Nearly all markets experienced a solid sales gain from one year ago,” Yun said. “The only markets with measurably lower sales were in San Diego, Riverside, and Sacramento, where inventory shortages for lower priced homes are limiting sales.”

    For the second month in a row, sales have risen in all price classes from a year earlier. Prior to October, the only consistent gains were in the lower price ranges.

    The national median existing-home price4 for all housing types was $172,600 in November, which is 4.3 percent below November 2008. Distressed properties, which accounted for 33 percent of sales in November, continue to downwardly distort the median price because they generally sell at a discount relative to traditional homes in the same area.

    Single-family home sales jumped 8.5 percent to a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 5.77 million in November from a level of 5.32 million in October, and are 42.1 percent above the pace of 4.06 million in November 2008. The median existing single-family home price was $171,900 in November, down 4.4 percent from a year ago.

    Existing condominium and co-op sales in November were unchanged from a seasonally adjusted annual rate of 770,000 in October, but are 60.1 percent above the 481,000-unit pace a year ago. The median existing condo price5 was $178,000 in November, which is 3.1 percent below November 2008.

    Regionally, existing-home sales in the Northeast rose 6.6 percent to an annual level of 1.13 million in November, and are 52.7 percent higher than November 2008. The median price in the Northeast was $223,400, down 13.1 percent from a year ago.

    Existing-home sales in the Midwest increased 8.4 percent in November to a pace of 1.55 million and are 53.5 percent above a year ago. The median price in the Midwest was $140,800, a decline of 0.4 percent from November 2008.

    In the South, existing-home sales rose 4.8 percent to an annual level of 2.39 million in November and are 44.8 percent higher than a year ago. The median price in the South was $151,400, down 1.4 percent from November 2008.

    Existing-home sales in the West increased 10.6 percent to an annual rate of 1.46 million in November and are 28.1 percent above November 2008. The median price in the West was $231,100, which is 4.1 percent below a year ago.

    Join the conversation about this story »

    See Also:

  • Scylla and Charybdis: Corruption, health care reform and climate change.

    A combination of flawed institutional practices, the nihilistic devastation of the Party of Beck and Limbaugh, and the political, economic and social importance of health care reform have made corrupt Democratic party senators immensely powerful.

    Since these people care about nothing but their own power and privilege, and because they hold millions of Americans hostage, they can extort a heavy price from far more honorable people. They make the Beckians seem almost respectable.

    It’s a tooth grinding time for compassionate rationalists. We know the historic price of failure. We know the GOP is ever more the party of unreason. We know too, the deep cost of social and institutional corruption.

    Knowing all this, for the sake of health care “reform” we’ve eroded our enamel. Do we go to dentures for the sake of senate action on climate change?

    I don’t think we can afford it, and I don’t think it will work. American support for climate policy is as fickle as the weather – by comparison support for health care action is relatively strong. Even if we continue to feed the leeches we still won’t get meaningful senatorial action.

    We’re going to have to find ways to act on climate change through a combination of Presidential powers, EPA regulatory authority, and state policy (California still matters – just as in the days of Silent Spring). Perhaps international CO2-based trade tariffs will cause enough American corporate pressure to bring pet Senators into line.

    No, it’s time to stop feeding the leeches. We’ve given up a lot, and the price continues to rise.

    This is the time to change course. The midterm elections are ahead, and the party of relative reason is almost certain to lose its Senatorial supermajority. Even if nothing else happens, Robert Byrd will expire.

    Losing the supermajority means we can now open yet another front against political corruption in America. No, not against Lieberman – that corrupt sod is safe until 2012 and will be well rewarded thereafter. Forget mere justice, this is about survival.

    We need to resurrect old ideas about campaign finance reform and start the long, hard fight against a culture of corruption that has grown up in so many aspects of American life – in politics, professional societies, physicians, the judiciary, corporate governance, the media, and in finance and regulatory authorities.

    Personally, I’ll be writing more on this topic in the months to come under a new tag of “corruption”. To start with I’ve asked the Center for Public Integrity to make it easier to find the feed for their latest from the center page. I’ve also become a Facebook fan of the CPI (yeah, there’s irony in using FB to fight corruption).

    I’ll be pointing to similar organizations and making some donations*. I’ll even be consorting with the enemy; although the GOP is merely seeking to advance their own immense corruption their attacks on corrupt Dems do provide valuable intelligence we can use.

    We’ve given a lot of ground for the millions of Americans held hostage to health care reform. We’re at the cliff’s edge now, we’ve got no more ground to give. We need to push back.

    Take your anger against Lieberman, Nelson, and the like – and use it. Not against them – forget ‘em. They’re history. Use your anger against their kin everywhere.

    Fight.

    * If you donate to any of these groups, you will be spammed mercilessly. Yeah, that’s kind of corrupt too. It ain’t a sweet world out there. Don’t give them a phone number, do give them your spam-only Yahoo email account.