Blog

  • Facebook News Feed No Longer Just in Real Time

    facebook-logoFacebook has just rolled out an updated version of its news feed that lets users switch between viewing a live version and an older one, where they can see what’s happened since they last logged in. Screenshots of possible news feeds Facebook was testing out began circulating around the web earlier this month.

    The social network overhauled the design of its news feed back in the spring to put the stream of real-time updates down the center of the page — similar to micromessaging site Twitter. It also created a “Highlights” section on the right-hand side of the page that contained select older content about your friends’ activity on the site, such as recently uploaded photo albums and links to articles and videos your friends shared. The new version is moving the “Highlights” section to the middle of the page, where it was located prior to the spring redesign.

    When asked if Facebook is rolling out the new version to get away from looking similar to Twitter, Facebook product manager Peter Deng said, “I don’t think we were trying to be like Twitter. Status updates have been on the page since 2006.” He added: “We’re showing you content that’s more popular when you first log in. But when you switch to live feed, it looks how it does today.”

    The latest news feed design just went live; it will be gradually rolled out to all of Facebook’s 300 million users throughout the day.

    facebook news feed


  • American Booksellers Association concerned that rapidly falling book prices will be bad for consumers. Yes, you read that right. Low prices = bad.

    ababooks

    Books, books, books! The American Booksellers Association, a trade group that represents small bookstores (not Barnes and Noble and the other big guys), has asked the Department of Justice to investigate whether or not Amazon, Wal-Mart, and Target have “[devalued] the very concept of the book” with their ongoing price war. Well, they’re actually asking for an investigation into their selling practices. That is, because Amazon wants to outsell Wal-Mart, and Wal-Mart wants to outsell Amazon, they both sell the latest book (think Stephen King, Dan Brown, etc.) for some really low price, like $10. When you consider that the average hardcover “should” cost something like $20-$30, just based on the wildly outdated economics of book-selling, then you understand why the ABA is so upset.

    Here’s what the ABA is thinking: it represents The Little Guy, the indie bookstore on Main Street, USA that doesn’t have the clout of Barnes and Noble or Borders. If these big guys keep trying to undercut each other, it lowers the price Main Street can set for a book. Why would someone pay $30 for a book when they can buy it for $10 from Wal-Mart? The problem becomes, after Main Street goes out of business, that limits the amount of information (books) out there. And what if some author releases a crazy book about some controversial topic, one that Wal-Mart refuses to carry because it doesn’t want to “offend” its customers or whatever? Now there’s no Main Street bookstore to turn to, and that information never gets out there. Then the marketplace of ideas suffers, and we’re all worse off. That’s the ABA’s thinking, at least, and it’s not entirely unreasonable, I don’t think.

    If you want, this topic could easily balloon into a much deeper, philosophical discussion on the entire book industry—remember, Barnes and Noble said the other day that the book industry is still bigger than Hollywood, video games, etc.—but other, better people have already begun to tackle that debate.

    And why is this on CrunchGear? Yup, e-books. You can make the argument, and the ABA has done just that, that it was the initial release of the Kindle that got this whole dangerous price war started. Amazon needed to jumpstart the public’s acceptance of e-books, so they did the inverse of what game companies do when they release a new system: game companies make money on the software and lose money on the hardware (at least initially), while Amazon was selling these e-books for something like one-third their “actual” value. Gotta get those Kindles out there!

    So that’s basically it. The ABA is concerned that a price war, started by the introduction of the Kindle, will eventually limit the number and quality of ideas available to y’all. You’re free to disagree, and I get the feeling that many of you will.

    Flickr


  • Charts (Sort of) Prove What We Already Knew: iPhone Pwns!

    Microsoft’s Windows 7 is released yesterday, and the boys and girls at Redmond are probably feeling very pleased with the news that pre-orders on Amazon for its latest OS have broken records. Windows 7 is now the biggest pre-order product in Amazon’s history.

    Not to be outdone, Apple is busy breaking records too. At the Web 2.0 Summit this week, Morgan Stanley’s Managing Director Mary Meeker revealed that the iPhone/iPod touch is the fastest growing consumer electronics platform in history. And she had some charts to prove it. TechCrunch’s Erick Schonfeld picked through her 60+ page presentation to focus on three iPhone-relevant slides.

    Mary Meeker - iPhone Platform Adoption

    Catchy title, no? But impressive. The iPhone/iPod touch has seen far steeper user adoption than that of other popular consumer electronics platforms, including other iPods.

    However, Gizmodo’s Dan Nosowitz very wisely points out:

    Comparing one gadget to another in a different category is messy and inconclusive. iPhone adoption is different than, say, Wii adoption for lots of reasons: The iPhone is a phone, a gadget which pretty much everybody has and needs, and it combined the capabilities of a phone with that of an established hit, the iPod. In contrast, the Wii is a videogame system, a category with a totally different demographic, requiring different kinds of software and accessories. They’re just not the same (and I only mentioned a couple reasons), and comparing unit shipments doesn’t necessarily prove anything.

    Mary Meeker Mobile Internet Adoption

    A slightly busier one, this illustrates how, in the two year period following its launch, the iPhone/iPod touch’s mobile internet user base has enjoyed a faster, higher adoption rate (57 million) than NTT Docomo’s mobile internet platform imode (25 million) and even desktop Internet legend AOL (7 million).

    Of course, it’s important to remember that Apple benefits (at least a little) from the changing times. Both AOL and imode enjoyed their super-growth in the mid to late 1990’s — the Internet’s Stone Age. While the iPhone platform is undoubtedly sophisticated, it takes advantage of extraordinary advances in hardware and software engineering that, a decade ago, were merely the stuff of geek dreams. Also, let’s not forget that — relative to the Internet’s ubiquity and sophistication today — the mobile and desktop Internet of the 90’s was far more expensive, harder to use and much less rewarding of an experience. Still, these are impressive numbers nonetheless. It’s just helpful to put them into perspective.

    Mary Meeker ATT Data Traffic

    If you want a chart that demonstrates just exactly why AT&T’s network is trembling at the knees beneath the strain of millions of data-hungry iPhones, look no further. Schonfeld added two arrows to pinpoint the June 2007 and July 2008 launches of, respectively, the iPhone and iPhone 3G. If you’re an iPhone owner and you don’t spend more time using the thing for email and web browsing than, y’know, actually talking to people, you’re in the minority. iPhone owners love their unlimited data.

    You can bet your bottom dollar Steve’s next keynote presentation will extrapolate some of this data (of course, his charts will contain no numbers but look way more sexy).

    View or download the entire presentation from Scribd, and tell me in the comments how no one uses the word “Pwns” any more.



    As Q4 begins, online video is now mainstream. Read the, “Connected Consumer Q3 Wrap-up.”

  • DHS Supports the GreenGov Challenge

    Last spring, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), launched a bold Efficiency Review initiative to make DHS a leaner, smarter agency better equipped to protect the nation.

    As part of the Efficiency Review, we are already taking steps big and small to build a green culture across the Department.

    A few examples include:

    • U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) is configuring it computers to automatically shut down/standby when they are not being used to avoid energy costs.
    • U.S. Customs and Border Protection will reduce energy usage by 25% by incorporating solar power in its new Border Patrol Sector Station in El Paso, Texas.
    • The new U.S. Coast Guard headquarters facility currently under construction will receive LEED Silver certification from the U.S. Green Building Council, incorporating state-of-the-art efficiency technologies like green roofs, landscaped courtyards to capture and reuse surface water runoff, and innovative heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems.

    That’s why I’m excited by the GreenGov Challenge that runs through the end of the month. It gives federal employees and our men and women in uniform a chance to submit their ideas to make us more environmentally responsible while cutting costs and streamlining operations.

    You can submit your ideas at www.WhiteHouse.gov/GreenGov through the end of the month. Together, we can make a difference in creating a more efficient and sustainable federal government.

    Janet Napolitano is Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security

  • Will Assassin’s Creed still be a trilogy?

    Ubisoft has been quite vocal about where they’re taking the Assassin’s Creed franchise. We know Assassin’s Creed 2 (PS3, Xbox 360, PC) will have quit…

  • Microsoft wins round one in its battle against Vista

    By Scott M. Fulton, III, Betanews

    Anyone who would continue to frame the consumer PC market in 1980s terms, as a continuance of the old war between Microsoft and Apple, would be sorely disappointed by this morning’s earnings news from Microsoft. The measured candor that continues to emerge from CFO Chris Liddell suggests that Macintosh and iPhone are not even on the company’s radar at the moment, and that his real battle is against a tougher and more menacing foe: Vista.

    As of yesterday, it was officially okay for Microsoft to pronounce Vista part of its past, to “un-support” it from a marketing standpoint (though certainly not from a service standpoint). Steering Microsoft clear of the perfect storm — the effects of the global recession, coupled with the peak in negative attitude toward Vista — means putting Vista behind it, placing it in the adversarial role normally characterized by someone who looks a lot more like Justin Long than John Hodgman.

    If Microsoft had continued on its unprecedented downward slope, as it was forced to report on last July, analysts might have concluded the company was in a recession of its own — a kind of corollary of the “two consecutive quarters of decline” rule normally applied to the country’s economic state. But the slope was not so down this time, and literally all the credit was bestowed upon the company’s newest, bravest warrior, Windows 7.

    “To put the quarter results into perspective, Q1 represented the highest number of Windows licenses sold in one quarter, ever,” pronounced Investor Relations GM Bill Koefoed, “and September was the highest single month of Windows unit sales ever. In summary, it was a very solid quarter for the Windows division; and with Windows 7, we have a great product for the recovering PC market.”

    During the low point of the economic crisis, what kept the PC market from collapsing altogether was the ability to shift its product mix towards netbooks — the lowest-priced segment, but certainly the lowest-margin end of the business as well. As Microsoft CFO Chris Liddell reported, netbooks went from 0 to 12% of the overall consumer PC market in just one year’s time. During that same year, Windows was able to find itself installed on 90% of those systems.

    “Find itself” is actually a very accurate phrase, because this wasn’t really what Microsoft intended, and it actually became something of a real problem. At a time when the company needed to tout Service Pack 2 as the life saver for Vista, the netbook surge presented consumers with the single biggest confirmation of Vista’s inadequacy to date: the presence of Windows XP, not Vista, on nearly all of those netbooks.

    “People are clearly willing to pay for having Windows on their netbooks, so that’s the first and most important fundamental,” Liddell told a Deutsche Bank analyst this morning. “Then in terms of Windows 7 reaction, clearly [we’ve] yet to see, but early indications in terms of the OEM builds that we’re having, and the mix that they’re putting in terms of Windows 7, is encouraging…in terms of their expectations of the number of people who are going to want to see a Windows 7 on their netbook as opposed to an XP. In terms of the ASP [average selling price], clearly it’s almost twice on Windows 7 what it would be on XP, or a significant premium…So it’s going to be beneficial, but I think it’s more important symbolically from our point of view that people see value in Windows 7 and are willing to pay for it. Netbooks, even though they’ve grown fast, are still a relatively small component of the overall demand, so it’s not going to have a massive financial impact, but it’ll certainly help in terms of ASP comparisons year-over-year, if we get the sort of good attach of Windows 7 that we’re starting to see in the early days.”

    As it did during Vista’s premiere, Microsoft has opted to defer about $1.5 billion of revenue from pre-orders of Windows 7 from OEMs and retail customers, until the following quarter. Still, the activity surrounding Win7 in this past quarter indicated that the period of time in which customers were deferring their operating system investments had clearly ceased. Operating income from its client division, now called the “Windows and Windows Live” division (reflecting the realignment of online software around the core product, and away from online services like Bing), dropped only marginally on an annual basis to $2.81 billion, on revenue just 3.3% lower at $3.98 billion. With Server & Tools and Entertainment & Devices income slightly higher on the year on revenue that was basically flat, the company was able to sustain a huge hit from the declining value of its stock awards — essentially a $2.2 billion write-down.

    So total income was down about 25.3% annually to $4.48 billion — not good, but not unexpected in the wake of last quarter. And besides a little bit of credit given to the success of Halo 3 on the Xbox 360 game platform, Windows 7 enthusiasm was credited for keeping income from business operations stable.

    “What I think we’re seeing is the robustness of the concept of a PC,” Liddell told an RBC Capital analyst this morning. “Even through an economic reset, it’s something that people want to spend money on, and I think that gives us confidence in the sort of long-term trend, the long-term ability to have good, potentially double-digit growth in PC demand. That’s clearly helped by the fact that we’ve got new form factors, Windows 7 helps clearly. You’re just seeing a general positive trend on a long-term basis [for] a reset.”

    The next battlefield for Microsoft will be getting Vista off of business desktops and notebooks. Toward that end, the cards could finally be stacked in Windows 7’s favor, for reasons Liddell alluded to today. Existing business PCs can be perceived as slow, for either of two reasons: If they’re five years old or more, they’re probably single-core. And if they’re newer than that, they’re probably stuck with Vista. Either way, they’re slow, and that perception may play into business’ decision to make a PC investment during calendar year 2010.

    At least maybe. “The big variable in my mind is business PCs,” stated CFO Liddell candidly. “That’s been a significant negative, that’s decreased double-digits over most of the last few quarters, and it’s dragged down the numbers. That can’t continue forever. Eventually those PCs wear out and have to be replaced, so the big variable in terms of rebound is going to be the strength and speed of the business PC refresh cycle. We hope and expect that to be next year…We’re probably still relatively cautious, but when you start to see a rebound in that, plus what you’re seeing in the consumer side, we feel pretty good about what we see demand’s going to look like in the next calendar year.”

    Liddell did let something slip a bit when he said that revenue for the Business Division should recover in the near term when business spending in general recovers, “combined with the impact of Office 2010.” That’s a product whose release window even now is the entire next year, but Liddell’s framework seems to put O10 someplace closer to late second-quarter, early third-quarter.

    Copyright Betanews, Inc. 2009



    Add to digg
    Add to Google
    Add to Slashdot
    Add to Twitter
    Add to del.icio.us
    Add to Facebook
    Add to Technorati



  • Citizen Journalism: Making a Psystar Hackintosh

    Reader Louis sent in this longish missive about his own experiences installing a Psystar Hackintosh. We were stymied last night by the authentification procedure so we didn’t even get as far as Louis but it seems that the install, while fairly seamless, is fraught with problems. The speakers on our HP, for example, don’t work and while Apple’s Ink feature shows up in the control panel, the touchscreen is about useless.

    Here’s Louis’ take:

    I saw your article about the success you’ve had. I’d like to share my experience to date.

    I’m running a G31M-ES2L and an 8800GT. It’s an original PsyStar machine with an upgraded video card.

    I purchased the app yesterday. Followed install instructions posted .
    The SL install reports a failure but I could boot to the desktop in SL with the Rebel EFI CD. (The instructions have since been revised to reflect this).

    Note: I also had to use a PS2 kbd in order to select the HD option when booting from the PsyStar CD (USB doesn’t work for me until I get to the desktop).
    Went through the normal OS registration info that comes up after install.

    The machine is basically crippled without an activation code for the Rebel EFI application ( it installs the kexts etc needed to properly recognize your HW) and Psystar is behind on sending them out (Just spoke with a very nice support person).

    So, all in all, things proceeded as they should have up to that point.

    Received the authentication code today and authenticated the app.

    However, the app errored out with my account info in the next step.

    Apparently you can’t get phone support for this app. I spoke with a tech who noted I had to send an email for support. He was very nice but couldn’t help.

    I rebooted and tried the authentication code a second time and the app won’t even accept it. It simply errors out now.

    REBEL EFI doesn’t appear to be ready for prime time yet, IMO.

    Who wants to wait days for support for something that’s supposed to simplify a process?

    FTR I do own Apple HW and this is mostly a fun/tinkering machine for secondary use.


  • Psystar Rebel EFI isn’t magic, won’t install OS X on “any machine”

    macosx10312py8When the Psystar Rebel EFI software launched yesterday, the Internet collectively gasped at the wild claims but a few people in the Hackintosh community probably knew better. Sites were claiming that the Rebel EFI software would allow OS X to be installed on any computer, but that simply isn’t true as I’ve found out over the last 12 hours. In fact, it doesn’t seem to offer any more hardware support than the open source Chameleon bootloader.

    Now, I found the Psystar software easier to use than Chameleon, but the same systems that previously rejected OS X using Chameleon, did the same with Psystar. One is an Core 2 Solo U3500 1.4GHz with a ATI Radeon HD 4330 GPU. This computer will not get past the gray screen with a spinning beach ball in the top left, which means the graphics card probably isn’t compatable according to the updated Rebel EFI FAQ page. The other is an Z520 Atom 1.33GHz netbook with an Intel GMA950 GPU. This guy won’t get past the Apple logo. I had the same results using Chameleon a few weeks ago.

    John managed to install OS X using the Rebel EFI bootloader on an HP Touchsmart computer yesterday. I’ve not had any luck so far though. In fact, we got an email a few minutes ago stating that while someone managed to install OS X and purchase the software, the activation key will not work, rendering the machine almost useless. Psystar’s phone tech support just told him to email the company but so far nothing has been resolved.

    The Psystar Rebel EFI might be a terrific piece of software, but it doesn’t seem ready for retail consumption yet. In the mean time, let me point you towards the rich development community behind the OSX86 project and Chameleon. Chances are that if they say your hardware isn’t compatible and their solutions won’t work, Psystar’s Rebel EFI installer probably won’t either.


  • Codename Keychest: Disney’s New Film View Technology

    Disney has been diligently working on a new technology, code-named Keychest, that would give users the ability to watch a movie from any device imaginable.

    Does Disney’s Keychest sound interesting to you? Tell us.

    Disney's KeychestA studio insider gave this scenario on how Keychest could possibly work…

    "Dad has a Zune, Mom has an iPod, there’s a Mac and a PC at home and a Roku box; right now, those devices don’t talk to one another … We intend to blend those worlds."

    It’s being rumored that Disney could begin testing the new technology in as little as two months, and it may be consumer ready by next year. Supposedly, Keychest will use cloud-computing coupled with a physical product (e.g. a DVD), that will only require the person to pay for the rights so that it could be watched on any device.

    It’s no secret that companies have been looking for a distribution model, as some feel consumers are slowly buying less DVD’s. This is where the Keychest technology would step in.

    Would you use Disney’s Keychest technology?
    Let us know.

  • Final Fantasy XIII Elixirs dated for retail

    Remember the Final Fantasy XIII (Xbox 360, PlayStation 3) Elixirs announced back in Tokyo? As promised, they’re heading to retail in Japan come winter…

  • Reality Check: WellPoint Analysis Continues the Misinformation Campaign

    Reality Check

    Constructive debate on health care is always welcome. It’s an important part of the process of achieving meaningful reform. Unfortunately, what we’ve seen out of the insurance industry over the past few weeks can’t be categorized as either "constructive" or even a "debate" but rather a misinformation campaign designed to confuse and distract attention from those who are seeking real health care solutions.
     
    The most recent salvo was a set of state-by-state analyses released yesterday by WellPoint claiming that under health reform individual premiums would skyrocket. Like the now widely discredited report from America’s Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) and the deeply flawed Blue Cross Blue Shield analysis, the WellPoint study arrives at its conclusion by cherry picking certain policies and ignoring major aspects of reform that would affect both the number of people covered and the premiums they would pay. Among the policies that WellPoint’s study consciously ignores: special policies for young adults including premium credits and a special "young invincibles" plan; reinsurance to lower the cost of catastrophic care; and the benefits of creating a new health exchange, which the non-partisan CBO says will reduce premiums. As a result, WellPoint reaches almost exactly the opposite conclusion that the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and other independent health experts have reached about the benefits of health insurance reforms.
     
    Bottom line: if you take a flawed methodology and break it down state by state, you still end up with a flawed result.
     
    The WellPoint analysis did make one novel argument worth noting. It argued that imposing fees on health insurance providers and drug and device makers represents a tax on individuals and families. This is an argument that is being echoed by conservative think tanks like AEI. But the claim does not withstand scrutiny for at least three reasons:  
    • First, the idea that the entire fee will be passed on to consumers is not credible – especially given the policy design. The policy assesses a flat amount per year, paid by companies based on their market share, beginning in 2010. The assumption that these companies will accumulate the amount of these fees and pass them along in a lump sum to enrollees later simply does not make sense.
       
    • Second, these fees are intended to recapture part of the benefits these businesses will get from reform. No one disputes that newly insuring nearly 30 million more Americans will increase their access to needed services – translating into new business for insurers, drug companies and device makers and other providers. This new revenue would far exceed the amount of the new fees – so if you believe that they will pass along the new assessment, they will also pass along their new windfall to consumers. 
       
    • Third, the fees help improve and expand coverage and thus reduce the $1,000 hidden tax tens of millions of Americans pay for the uncompensated care of the uninsured. Even if you believed that somehow companies would find a way to pass the fees along, they would be more than outweighed by the benefits middle-class families would get from not only hundreds of billions of dollars in health care tax credits but from reducing the hidden tax they currently pay for the uninsured.
      
     
     
     
  • Frenkel: Introducción y ejercicios

    Hablar del Sr. Frenkel, es mencionar a la Tabes Dorsal como patología de cabecera, entre otras tantas en dónde una de las principales afecciones es la vía sensitiva. A veces me pongo a pensar, no digo siempre, solo un par de ocasiones aisladas jaja de como estos grandes apellidos de la kinesiología como el Dr. Kabat, Lovett o el ya nombrado Frenkel, crearon estos ejercicios tan eficientes para el tratamiento de diferentes patologías, y sin debate interno de mis pensamientos, no me cabe duda que tuvieron aparte de un gran conocimiento, un factor en común que fue la “creatividad”.

    Nuestra carrera a mi entender, pasa mucho por eso, ya que con simples útiles como una tabla de madera, una esfera, etc podemos crear un instrumento eficaz para algún ejercicio en particular proyectado a nuestro paciente. Bueno ya no los voy a aburrir más con estos pensamientos “made in locura” jaja, y paso a desarrollar Frenkel.

    Consisten en una serie de ejercicios cuidadosamente planeados que pretende hacer emplear al paciente lo que se conserva de su sentido muscular con el objetivo de evitar su disminución progresiva e incluso conseguir una mejoría. Frenkel consideraba que, a pesar de estar afectada la vía sensitiva, el paciente tabético puede aprender a realizar completo de lo que persiste en su sentido muscular por medio de la repetición constante. En realidad, este principio se demuestra en los casos en que sobreviene precozmente la atrofia óptica, y en las cuales la ataxia se desarrolla en forma lenta e incompleta ya que el individuo ciego se ve obligado a depender de su sentido muscular y articular, y lo utiliza en su máxima capacidad. Sin embargo, si el sentido muscular es prácticamente inexistente en la época en que el paciente acude al tratamiento, el objeto de los ejercicios consiste en enseñarle a reemplazar su sentido perdido por el sentido de la visión. El tratamiento debe empezar lo más pronto posible. Si el paciente se halla en la fase preatáxica, debe realizar los movimientos más complejos posibles. En las fases tardías los ejercicios deben empezar con movimientos muy simples y deben progresar gradualmente hasta los más complicados. Sea cual fuese la fase en la que halla el paciente, deben observarse ciertas reglas.

    Las reglas son las siguientes:

    1. Instrucciones se realizan con voz monótona, ejercicios en forma numerada.
    2. Cada ejercicio debe ser correctamente exhibido por nuestro paciente para poder pasar a otro de mayor dificultad.
    3. La palabra progresión se refiere a la dificultad de los ejercicios y no a la potencia, por ende no llevar a cabo ejercicios de mucha potencia muscular.
    4. Se empiezan con movimientos de amplitud completa, denominados fáciles a comparación de los denominados difíciles, corta amplitud.
    5. Los movimientos se realizan en forma rápido al principio, para luego realizarlos en forma lenta, lo que conlleva mas dificultad porque se necesita una mayor precisión.
    6. El paciente debe realizar los ejercicios con ojos abiertos, para luego hacerlos con ojo cerrado.
    7. Tenemos que tener un seguimiento estricto sobre nuestro paciente debido a la peligrosidad de las caídas.
    8. Es conveniente intercalar entre ejercicios, tiempos de reposo programados.
    9. Hacer una excelente historia clínica, estado fisico, y anotar su progreso del día a día.

    Los movimientos se realizan con variando posiciones, utilizando decúbito sentado, dorsal y bipedestación. Algunos de los mismos son los siguientes:

    Decúbito Dorsal:

    • Con ayuda del terapeuta flexionar y estirar miembros inferiores rozando la planta del pie en el plano de apoyo (camilla, o en lo q este acostado). Primero un miembro, luego el otro, alternadamente.
    • Sin ayuda del terapeuta, flexionar y estirar miembros inferiores, rozando la planta del pie en el plano de apoyo. Primero un miembro, luego el otro, alternadamente.
    • Sin ayuda del terapeuta, flexionar y estirar miembros inferiores rozando la planta del pie en el plano, combinar con apertura y cierre del miembro inferior. Primero un miembro, luego el otro, alternadamente.
    • Sin ayuda del terapeuta, flexionar y estirar miembros inferiores alternadamente, sin rozar la planta con el plano de apoyo (5cm arriba), abriendo y cerrando.
    • Pies sobre una alohada. Pedir al paciente que flexione, extienda, gire, lateralice, etc, el tobillo.
    Decúbito sentado:

    • Cruces en el piso. Indicar diciendo: adelante, atrás, a la derecha, a la izquierda, etc.. (dibujar como una estrella de puntos cardinales en el piso como referencia).
    • Con la manos en la rodilla (para dar el impulso), el terapeuta le opone una pequeña resistencia en los hombros del paciente, pedir que se levante.
    • Idem anterior, pero sin resistencia en los hombros.
    Bipedestación:

    • Caminando, en la barra. Volcar peso en una pierna, deslizar la otra, poner peso en esta ultima, deslizar la otra, y así sucesivamente.
    • Para girar. Levanto la punta del pie, giro. Con el otro pie: levanto talón, giro, me desplazo.

    Les dejo unos videos que hicimos el año pasado en clase, tratan sobre los ejercicios detallados anteriormente, disculpen la calidad tanto de audio como video, pero se pueden utilizar como guía.. Advertencia!!!: El video fue tomado de un celular, por gente inexperta en temas de video filmación (me incluyo) , por algo estudiamos kinesio no?..

  • Wal-Mart rolling out tech support services

    guyHey, lookin’ good there Mr. Man. I like your protective booties. They look like slippers!

    Wal-Mart has contracted with service provider N.E.W. to offer tech support services, seemingly in an attempt to compete with Best Buy’s Geek Squad and similar outfits.

    It’s probably not a bad idea, seeing as though Wal-Mart is making a bigger push into the consumer electronics retail void that’s been left open by the closing of stores like CompUSA and Circuit City.

    Plans will apparently be offered on prepaid cards with pricing set at between $99 and $339 for services such as TV, home theater, and wireless network setups, to name a few. Service will be provided by third-party contractors, so it’s not quite the same as how Best Buy offers in-store Geek Squad stuff. This appears to be more in-home service only, not counter service inside actual Wal-Mart stores.

    Service offerings are expected to roll out in all Wal-Mart locations by the holidays.

    [via Reuters]


  • Light it up, Sega style!

    Sega may not be into making consoles anymore, but look! Zippo has gone and picked up the slack for them. Sort of. Check these out – Zippo has rolled…

  • Guard cooks compete for annual food service title

    Call it the military’s version of the ‘Iron Chef.’…

  • South Carolina represents U.S. at Falcon Air Meet 2009

    ‘Falcon Air Meet 2009,’ a multi-national F-16 competition hosted by the Royal
    Jordanian Air Force officially opened here Oct. 20…

  • Battlefield Airmen considered a weapons system

    The capabilities of battlefield Airmen are considered just as lethal as any
    advanced weapons system…

  • Guardsmen shoot with world’s premier snipers

    One shot, one kill: It’s the creed of every sniper…

  • Challenge Academy students help former cadet in need

    The cold and the rain could not dampen the enthusiasm in Spc. Jason Schulz’s
    heart…

  • Disney’s Keychest: Is Giving Back Your Fair Use Rights With More DRM Really A Step Forward?

    A bunch of folks have sent in different stories about Disney’s new “Keychest” technology offering, which would (in theory) allow users to purchase content that would be stored online, and which they could then access from any “participating service.”


    With Keychest, when a consumer buys a movie from a participating store, his accounts with other participating services–such as a mobile-phone provider or a video-on-demand cable service–would be updated to show the title as available for viewing. The movies wouldn’t be downloaded; rather, they would reside with each particular delivery company, such as the Internet service provider, cable company or phone company.

    The idea, supposedly is:


    to address two of the biggest hurdles blocking widespread consumer adoption of movie downloads: the difficulty of playing a movie back on devices other than a PC or laptop, and limited storage space on those computers’ hard drives.

    Now, while you must admit that allowing people to access the same content after a single purchase on multiple devices is definitely a step up from the “old” way of doing things, it does kind of ignore some important points: such as the fact that, for the most part, you could already do this on your own. As we know, it’s legal to rip your CD’s and then store that content on an iPod or on your computer and listen to the music how you want to do so. And, even though this is perfectly legitimate fair use of content for movies as well, Hollywood has used the worst provision in the DMCA — the anti-circumvention provision — to block people from doing what is accepted fair use with movie and television content.

    So all Keychest really seems to be doing is giving you back your fair use rights on content — but also wrapping it in additional DRM, such that it only works on “participating services.” Oh, and it could include other limitations as well:


    And Keychest would allow movie studios to dictate how many devices, connected to which distribution networks, a given title can be played on.

    So, kudos to Disney for recognizing that people hate having to buy the same content over and over again and hate being limited on what devices they can view content on… but, creating a new, more permissive DRM solution, just to give back some of an individual’s fair use rights, isn’t really a huge win.

    Permalink | Comments | Email This Story