{"id":139507,"date":"2010-01-05T07:04:15","date_gmt":"2010-01-05T12:04:15","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/nw0.eu\/2010\/01\/05\/climategate-you-should-be-steamed.html"},"modified":"2010-01-05T07:04:15","modified_gmt":"2010-01-05T12:04:15","slug":"climategate-you-should-be-steamed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/mereja.media\/index\/139507","title":{"rendered":"Climategate: You should be steamed"},"content":{"rendered":"

NEIL FRANK
\nHOUSTON CHRONICLE<\/a>
\nMonday, January 4th, 2010<\/span><\/p>\n

Now that Copenhagen is past history, what is the next
\nstep in the man-made global warming controversy? Without question,
\nthere should be an immediate and thorough investigation of the
\nscientific debauchery revealed by \u201cClimategate.\u201d<\/p>\n

If you have not heard, hackers penetrated the computers of the
\nClimate Research Unit, or CRU, of the United Kingdom\u2019s University
\nof East Anglia, exposing thousands of e-mails and other documents. CRU
\nis one of the top climate research centers in the world. Many of the
\nexchanges were between top mainstream climate scientists in Britain and
\nthe U.S. who are closely associated with the authoritative (albeit
\ncontroversial) Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Among the
\nmore troubling revelations were data adjustments enhancing the
\nperception that man is causing global warming through the release of
\ncarbon dioxide (CO2) and other atmospheric greenhouse gases.<\/p>\n

Particularly disturbing was the way the core IPCC scientists (the
\nbelievers) marginalized the skeptics of the theory that man-made global
\nwarming is large and potentially catastrophic. The e-mails document
\nthat the attack on the skeptics was twofold. First, the believers
\ngained control of the main climate-profession journals. This allowed
\nthem to block publication of papers written by the skeptics and
\nprohibit unfriendly peer review of their own papers. Second, the
\nskeptics were demonized through false labeling and false accusations.<\/p>\n

Climate alarmists would like you to believe the science has been
\nsettled and all respectable atmospheric scientists support their
\nposition. The believers also would like you to believe the skeptics are
\ninvolved only because of the support of Big Oil and that they are few
\nin number with minimal qualifications.<\/p>\n

Full article here<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Related Posts:<\/h3>\n